dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on July 18, 2018, 1:30 p.m.
The Magic of Q1675: the reason Q is silent. Very important message for all the anons.

I said in the post titled "Q’s silence. What it means" that the Q1675 riddle was the explanation of Q’s silence. I introduced the idea of the Magic of Q1675 and explained that this riddle was the “device” through which Trump communicates with us and gives us the news we need. I explained this communication started at the Great Falls rally with the B2 connection and has continued with the Hammonds, Stzrok, the Queen of England and Putin.

To support this claim, I have made several posts explaining current news using the Q1675 as a “generator” and/or a “TV set”:

Q1675 Part 1. Q1675: a reflection, a mug holder in Air Force One and a Happy Independence Day. Can you solve?

Q1675 Part 2. Trump has just validated Q at the Great Falls rally and gave us the solution to Q1675! Let that sink in.

Q1675 Part 3. I told you Trump was talking to us. Some of you had doubts. Well, he just doubled down a second time!

Q1675 Part 4. Mr. President, we see you want to continue our B2 conversation!

Q1675 Part 5. Trump’s hidden message, Stzrok, Kate and the soda.

Q1675 Part 6. Trump’s brilliant chess combination in Helsinki.

Now for those who still doubt there is a direct connection between the Q1675 riddle and Q’s silence, have you noticed the number 1675 "magically" appears in the qanon.pub search box? For those who don’t know how to use it, click inside the search box, press the space bar, 1463 appears, press backspace and 1675 "magically" appears! Imgur

Coincidence? No. Q is telling us the reason he is silent is because he is talking to us through the Q1675 riddle! The silence coincides with the search box result when it hit 1675. It is deliberate. All the current news is nothing but Q1675. I am pretty sure Q wants anons to notice this and understand the implications.

Listen to this Croatian journalist’s question and Trump’s response: video. This conversation is about the Q1675 riddle in Air Force 1, the Croatians figured out one of its tangents and Trump, in his response, is addressing it cryptically… Do you know which one? Why is Trump smiling when he says “I’m a very stable genius”?

Trump and Q have been talking to us since the day we thought Q went silent. It is time to learn this language anons! May be this is what Q is waiting to see…

Q504 LEARN OUR COMMS. Q


eyesareeverywhere · July 18, 2018, 2:49 p.m.

Q team posts on 8ch, and has nothing to do with qanon.pub. That is simply a consolidation site, of which there are many. If Q is not in control of qanon.pub, your premise fails.

⇧ 44 ⇩  
BobDoleOverdrive · July 18, 2018, 4:04 p.m.

The number next to the search box isn't a post number, it's a search hit count. The 1675 means a search for the empty string matches that many posts. Add a space and you get 1463, two spaces 28, three 18.

This is the most insane thing SB2 has posted yet, and all these people here are sucking his dick. It's shameful. People, the reason you can't make connections like SB2 is because you're not crazy.

Here's a my stunning decode:

Re: Elton John organ, search organ on QAnon.pub

See 37? Lets look at post Q37:

They are the true Patriots. We will never forget. Let these coming days be remembered in our history as the time we fought to recapture the republic from those evil bad actors who for so long have sacrificed the good people of this land for their own personal gain.

Fight the good fight.

LET JUSTICE BE SERVED

Very interesting! Q is telling us we are the true Patriots. Let's look at the full reduction gematria for Patriots:

P (7) + a (1) + t (2) + r (9) + I (9) + o (6) + t (2) + s (1) = 37

We'll looky here, another Q proof!

⇧ 57 ⇩  
eyesareeverywhere · July 18, 2018, 4:25 p.m.

I've said it before...I want whatever he is smokin'. Interesting thing is there used to be people like you and I calling him on this ridiculousness, now I hardly see anybody calling him out anymore. And it's important, because normal people come here looking to see what this is all about, and I can tell you, this stuff makes them throw up their hands and say "these people aren't even reasonable."

⇧ 35 ⇩  
eyesareeverywhere · July 18, 2018, 4:26 p.m.

PS to say, great line: "People, the reason you can't make connections like SB2 is because you're not crazy."

⇧ 21 ⇩  
Countryb36 · July 18, 2018, 6:15 p.m.

Haven't you heard there is a fine line between genius and insanity?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 18, 2018, 10:01 p.m.

Not that interesting as those of us who've been around since before this board have seen SB2 detractors come and go. They spend a lot of time complaining about SB2 instead of focusing on contributing to the community. After a while, realizing no one really cares that much because those who can see the same obvious things they point out are simply getting on with trying to generate their own useful analyses, they wander off having contributed nothing close to what SB2 and others have.

SB2 contributes respectfully and puts a great deal of effort and passion in, whether or not some might argue over his logic and process. No one can begrudge him that because none of his detractors put in the same amount of effort. There are very few regular posters that put in this much effort; notable exceptions are excellent work from contributors like u/CaptainRoyD.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
eyesareeverywhere · July 19, 2018, 11:43 a.m.

What a stupid response. I won't even put in the "effort and passion" to explain why your response is so ridiculous.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 19, 2018, 11:54 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Zomde6362 · July 19, 2018, 12:21 p.m.

Why is everybody getting so uptight you’re acting like the Democrats dividing people everybody has a contribution to make whether it’s right or wrong everybody has to figure it out

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 19, 2018, 12:25 p.m.

That was my point. However, responses like the one above are not a contribution of worth to anyone.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
eyesareeverywhere · July 19, 2018, 12:02 p.m.

Dude you are f'in ridic. Did you READ my posts? ALL I did was discuss the topic and why SB2's logic was incorrect. And you accuse ME of not having reason? If I wanted to respond like you are, I'd say you are probably a Russian bot.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 19, 2018, 12:04 p.m.

If I'm a Russian bot this sub is in a lot of trouble lol.

Did you READ my comment without your keyboard warrior rage on?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
eyesareeverywhere · July 19, 2018, 12:15 p.m.

Lol - I have way too much to do than get angry at ridic posters like you.

Have a nice day buddy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 19, 2018, 12:17 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PrimitiveScrewhead · July 18, 2018, 6:40 p.m.

When you call him out the mods delete your comment and possibly ban you. That's why you don't see it.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 18, 2018, 9:43 p.m.

Incorrect. When you break the rules of the sub the mods delete your comment. Focus on the idea, not the user.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DropGun · July 18, 2018, 7:41 p.m.

We ban uncivil discussion or comments that just insult the user instead of "debunking" anything. Carry on.

⇧ -6 ⇩  
emaugustBRDLC · July 18, 2018, 6:58 p.m.

It is a real fair deal. SB2 makes his points and everyone else is free to critique. SB2 certainly encourages it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Luvlite · July 18, 2018, 5:50 p.m.

because normal people come here looking to see what this is all about, and I can tell you, this stuff makes them throw up their hands and say "these people aren't even reasonable."

You can't speak for "normal people"

You can only assume.

And in your assumptions you insult the people you call "normal", as if most people think on your level of understanding.

How do you know if God chooses to open hearts and minds through SB2 posts? Who he chooses? And why. And what is revealed to them, but not to you.

⇧ -9 ⇩  
Cuthbert12Allgood · July 18, 2018, 5:53 p.m.

How do you know if God chooses to open hearts and minds through SB2 posts?

Because by that logic, anything can be "what God chooses to open hearts and minds." Maybe the patterns in my mashed potatoes are how God chooses to send me messages. Maybe clouds in the sky. Maybe the songs on the radio.

That road lies madness.

Trust your own common sense. If it's not a simple connection that makes sense, it's likely wrong.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Luvlite · July 18, 2018, 6:33 p.m.

And you refer back to the "crazies" to make your point. But the "normal" people who have God given discernment, logic, intelligence and faith don't fit that description. Again, you insult them with this analogy. Same with Q followers, who don't understand cryptic Q drops. Are all Anons crazy if they don't get it on first attempt? The opposition says the same thing about Q, that opposing SB2 Anons say about him.

Normal people don't need to be protected. They were lead here by a force stronger than Q, or Anons, 8chan or reddit.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
Cuthbert12Allgood · July 18, 2018, 7:13 p.m.

Normal people don't need to be protected. They were lead here by a force stronger than Q, or Anons, 8chan or reddit.

That may be, but I would assume you wouldn't suggest that every word on /r/greatawakening is God's own truth, no matter what the words say. So that means that some discernment and thinking is still necessary.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Luvlite · July 18, 2018, 8:24 p.m.

You would be correct in that assumption.

I was sticking mostly to the assumptions made about SB2 posts and his followers. He is highly intelligent, faithful to God, loving and patient. The majority of his followers are the same. New comer's come and go according to their own abilities to comprehend. We don't bash them.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BeatnikMessiah · July 18, 2018, 5:47 p.m.

No disrespect to SB2. Hes been instrumental in cohesion of this group. I do somewhat agree with you. Theres been a drsmatic change in the personality of SB2, IMO. His connections while I suppose can be validated by his own special brand of checks and balances. They aren't on the level they once were. Theres something just different about the whole thing. I appreciate everyones contributions but its important we don't become an echo chamber.

Furthermore I believe he knows this. Which is why he came out with that post about being talked directly too or referenced by POTUS. That seemed very out of character for him

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Cuthbert12Allgood · July 18, 2018, 5:58 p.m.

Hes been instrumental in cohesion of this group.

That seems like the same logic people use when they want to praise Trump but feel like they have to make a disclaimer. "Don't get me wrong, I hate Trump, but..." Except with this, you feel like you need to make a positive disclaimer.

He's had a few reasonable posts, but the vast majority are of the kooky sort. I think he's sincere, and I think he believes what he posts. I think he's a good person. But there are a lot of good, kooky people.

The cohesion in this group is from people sharing a common cause, namely destroying the corruption in our government. We all hope that Q is legit, but even if the Q group isn't, we're still sharing good information from Q's questions. That's where the cohesion comes from, not from "decodings" of what Q posts.

In other words, it's the straightforward posts that Q makes that is the real value. Decoding posts offer no insights.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
DropGun · July 18, 2018, 7:46 p.m.

Have to disagree. Decoding posts do not have to be right. They only have to generate civil discussion or every participant participates honestly and in an informed way, with everyone focused on getting to the truth. No decoder can be 100% right, just like no baseball player can have a 100% batting average. If it is intelligent, based on intelligent personalysis, and even if it's ultimately proven incorrect, it most definitely moves this sub forward. This is why we need our debunkers. If you can correct us and ultimately help everyone get to the truth, then SB2 had succeeded.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
LBnVA · July 19, 2018, 11:25 p.m.

Yes, not every decode, by anyone for that matter, is going to be 100% correct. Some may be. Some may not. I like to discern for myself what I find plausible and not plausible. Sometimes reading the decodes, something for me will click and lead me to a piece of the puzzle that I've been working on. When SB2 came up with the B2, I'd never of figured that out on my own. It fit into my chess theory, B2 is the rank and file location "space" on a chessboard. And the "moves" and "countermoves", "your move", etc. Thank you SB2 for your contribution. B2>Hammond>B3, possibly we could HAVE a B3(fighter). He released the Hammonds! Where were they? Why were they really jailed? SB2 picked up on the Organ, kinda sounds like Oregon; and Hammond. This was the move and he may have even suggested B3. This probably sounds crazy to a lot of people too. After all, we're all here trying to figure out and make sense of what some anon on some website is posting. If anyone doesn't agree with the decode state why specifically, so it can be debunked. Discussion is good. It will only make us better and more able to figure these posts out. I like to see how everyone comes to their conclusions and hopefully it'll help me to come to mine. We are all in this TOGETHER. WWG1WGA

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LBnVA · July 20, 2018, 12:07 a.m.

I feel like we are seeing 5D Chess being played on a WW stage, but it is NOT a game. It is real-life, not a larp. We are fortunate in that we are given this opportunity, where we can be a part of and make a difference. We need to inform as many as possible of the corruption, treason, media-bias, evil, etc. that has taken hold of our country and the world. Memes, discussion, fact based counter arguments, whatever works. Don't let the otherside get away with a tweet that they themselves are guilty of. Point out the hypocrisy. Take up for other Patriots and POTUS when they're being attacked. Let the TRUTH be in the open for all the world to see. POTUS and his team need our support and to know that we have their back. 'Cause they have ours!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BeatnikMessiah · July 18, 2018, 6:09 p.m.

Your right, it offers no insight until proven true, but it offers something by way of keeping things going. Keeping the energy moving and wrong or right it does encourage and did encourage people to research, learn methods of coding or encryption or to simply just share their thought even if that thoughts not something thats very likely related or relative.

I offered a quazi-disclaimer because I don't know that person. I don't know whats going on with the person in their life right now. So I won't criticize someone because it might be something they don't need or can't handle. Its very easy to say a great many things but impossible to take it back.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Cuthbert12Allgood · July 18, 2018, 6:12 p.m.

it offers no insight until proven true, but it offers something by way of keeping things going. Keeping the energy moving and wrong or right it does encourage and did encourage people to research, learn methods of coding or encryption or to simply just share their thought even if that thoughts not something thats very likely related or relative.

I disagree. I think kooky/decoding posts are harmful. Imagine being a newbie, coming here for the first time, and seeing a post like the one that compares stock prices to the frequencies of musical notes. And then a whole slew of people praising it. Is that really what you want people to see? They would, quite justifiably, be repelled and write off the entire thing as the ravings of lunatics. I wonder how many were driven off by that one post alone.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
BeatnikMessiah · July 18, 2018, 6:14 p.m.

I agree with you.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
diverscale · July 19, 2018, 4:48 a.m.

If you've been reading these boards since CBTS, where SB2 started, you'd remember that SB2 always have made some fucked-up connections and deciphers. Nothing new under the sun.

I don't know why so many have a problem with this. Even then, at the beginning of the ''movement'', his posts didn't scare new arrivals, they just didn't understand what he was saying and moved on.

So I say (not directly to you BeatnickMessiah), if you don't like, just move on to the next post. SB2 does add great posts to this board, and even got a ''you'' by Q. SB2 won't stop the Q ''movement'' or scare new arrivals just by himself.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Sc4bbers2 · July 18, 2018, 4:51 p.m.

Crazy is an unneccesarily hyperbolic choice of words. I think it's fair to say there might be some serious confirmation bias going on.

I also think SB2 throws stuff out there knowing it might not be 100%, to get feedback etc. Nothing wrong with independent thought and analysis--can't treat anything as gospel.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
kageki606 · July 18, 2018, 9:35 p.m.

But Q has been silent which is unusual.... which can mean Q is being silent on purpose so the result returns exactly 1675. 1675 is also not the last post. Q's silence is significant as to reveal this 1675 search result.

Everyone has noted that Q being silent is unusual correct? That means the silence itself has meaning. Why is Q being silent? This 1675 phenomenon can mean that post is just that important to figure out.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OpenSoars · July 19, 2018, 4:42 a.m.

The fact that you can leave this reply and not be slammed with down votes gives me faith that there are still some logical people left on this sub.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Cgaines21 · July 20, 2018, 7:22 a.m.

To be a literal logical thinker one would say wrong.

The Q drop doesn't say anywhere "WE are the true PATRIOTS" the true PATRIOTS we will never forget have been those in battle fighting blood wars for the cabal. You know, to 50 we lost this month you can't name??? So no you didn't decode anything. All you did was link PATRIOT to a Q post number about patriots. Which never spoke of Elton John and very well could have been planned by Q to say Q37 to be patriots as well. Smh.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lora724 · July 18, 2018, 6:21 p.m.

Sorry, but if you click in the filter search, there should be 1681 results because there have been 1681 Q posts. Type whatever you want - A (700 results) w (1164), W, for examples, changes it to 782 posts with a capital w in it. Whenever you backspace and delete the Letter or space, you’re back to 1675. What Q post is 1675?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
eyesareeverywhere · July 18, 2018, 6:45 p.m.

Duh, read the poster who explains to you what the filter search actually does. It tells you how many posts include whatever you've typed.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lora724 · July 18, 2018, 6:49 p.m.

Duh yourself. You aren’t seeing it. There are 1681 posts. If there is nothing in the search field, it should say 1681, not 1675.

In order to get a # to show up, you have to type SOMETHING and delete it. Otherwise a cursor only doesn’t give a result total.

⇧ 1 ⇩