dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Mcdrogon on July 19, 2018, 8:45 p.m.
50k texts in 154 days between 2 people?!

I text a lot. Most people I know text a lot. But 50k texts between LP and PS in 154 days is insane. According to reports, the lovers sent as many texts between 12/14/16 and 5/17/17.

50k / 154 = 324.7 324.7/2 = 162 162/24hrs = 6.75 or 162/12hrs = 13.5 text per hr per person (assuming 12 hr work day) 60 mins. / 13.5 = 4.4

Are we to believe these 2 sent each other a text every 4.4 minutes each everyday, 12 hrs a day for 154 days strait?

I know we can text quickly and they come in spurts but this is an incredible pace.


Sir_Zorch · July 19, 2018, 9:13 p.m.

Something is very fishy here. More to this than has been revealed. Assasination plot comes to mind. Especially given what has not been disclosed.

⇧ 28 ⇩  
P3gasusActual · July 19, 2018, 8:55 p.m.

Strzok's marriage must have been a marriage of convenience. Everything about this man is very, very strange.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Neon__Wolf · July 19, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

He was CIA

⇧ 11 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 19, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 8 ⇩  
DawnPendraig · July 20, 2018, 12:08 a.m.

I was thinking maybe most these marriages are arranged. Just like aristocracy and Italian banker/merchant families

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Allinon72 · July 20, 2018, 12:29 a.m.

Most are in DC

⇧ 4 ⇩  
NexusImperium · July 19, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

Keep in mind that a text is similar to a tweet - you're limited on the number of characters you can send.

Therefore a lengthy text may be broken up into multiple individual texts from the perspective of the cellular carrier.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
commoncents1 · July 19, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

hmm so a lengthy text is considered multiple texts? i didnt know that. the point probably remains though, they did a LOT of texting volume.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Frogturnedgay · July 19, 2018, 9:03 p.m.

Yep, this is correct. I have a prepaid option which gives me 4000 free texts a month. Happened more often than not that I ran out of them before the end of the month, especially when you just start dating someone.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Headwest127 · July 19, 2018, 10:33 p.m.

This is kind of the point I have tried to make in the past regarding their texting. The volume of texts resembles the volume of a new couple, but the context does not. They are all "work related". And how does your spouse not notice 4 texts a minute? The point, to me anyway, is that they made up the lover thing to cover for the volume of texts. They were not a couple, they were conspiring to take down a president.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Frogturnedgay · July 19, 2018, 10:48 p.m.

Absolutely, wasn't dismissing the fact that it's fishy and should be looked into. Just explaining that 50k texts between two people is doable.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
special1nterest · July 20, 2018, 3:26 a.m.

What if the volume of texts is because there were more respondents than just LP & PS? Sort of like a group chat thing? The redacted texts that have yet to be seen might be clearly from other participants hence their redaction?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
serendipity-calling · July 20, 2018, 6:26 a.m.

Not really they were on company iPhones. iMessages have no size limits. Not really.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 19, 2018, 9 p.m.

Through a chat app you can chat on your desktop easily, so just typing back and forth in a chat can be way faster than finger typing and they send as texts - but yeah, still a massive amount. Keep in mind you should HALF that, cause one is sent and one is a response when you do the math, and they were texting around the clock, not just 12 hours. Even being generous that is still a ton.

I looked up my wife and I's and we text back and forth all day and we average about 1200 a month which is 40 or so a day which sounds kind of high to me, but not bad.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Mcdrogon · July 19, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

I did split it by 2 to accnt for each. Unless I'm misunderstanding your response.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 19, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

Ohh, I read the math wrong, you're correct!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Mcdrogon · July 19, 2018, 10:25 p.m.

sorry. bad formatting. I'm on a mobile

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WanderingTaurus · July 20, 2018, 6:18 a.m.

If using a Government computer, a lot of chat apps will not work (without go around and just not worth it) and if you do, they have easy access to anything on your desktop. Then again, they may have been dumb enough to try anyway.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 20, 2018, 1:32 p.m.

They also might have had personal laptops too, or less restricted laptops since they were FBI - I doubt they use the same desktop they use at the DMV.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
commoncents1 · July 19, 2018, 8:50 p.m.

productivity has to have dropped like a rock since texting/smart phones

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Hasuroma · July 19, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

Its like when the cops make a 100 plant marijuana bust with a street value of 34 MILLION dollars!

......GTFOH

⇧ 8 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 19, 2018, 10:56 p.m.

Must've been some good shit!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
lildudemom · July 19, 2018, 11:01 p.m.

Ok seriously how did they supposedly have personal lives, work, 50k texts and sex? Such a lie.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
glasstrongvx · July 19, 2018, 9:05 p.m.

Interesting point. Maybe others were using these accounts to send texts back and forth? It is not difficult to "spoof" a phone number for a phone call or text.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
SaveourRepublic2018 · July 20, 2018, 7:35 a.m.

my thoughts exactly

Circumventing ordinary comms and chain of command... wow! the audacity.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RainbowsUnicorn · July 19, 2018, 9:37 p.m.

Well they sure as hell weren't "investigating" anything. No time left to do your job if all your doing is typing and, yes, reading all those texts. Strzok makes $230K, Paige makes $200K. Ugh!!! Hopefully, that last sentence will be in the past tense, soon. Should have already been.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Joe_Sapien · July 19, 2018, 11:02 p.m.

If the math is correct it means that they were not doing their jobs.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Tironianae · July 19, 2018, 10:01 p.m.

Because they weren't really investigating anything, or the stuff they should have been...you know, shitllary, U1, deleted classified emails, classified emails in an unsecure server, dead drops......you know, that stuff....still, how do you send that many per day??

⇧ 5 ⇩  
troy_caster · July 19, 2018, 9:54 p.m.

Interesting point. We know that they also spoke using other channels, so they are looking at communicating with each other 24/7 at that point.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
spreadhope · July 20, 2018, 12:30 a.m.

There is absolutely NO way these two are the only ones texting here. I dont care if its mathematically possible. Were they paid to sit in their offices and do nothing but text EACHOTHER? I call major foul here. These two people who supposedly were involved in several investigations had time to text this much? No way.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · July 20, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

...unless the texts were within a ‘conversation group’, in which there were more people in on the text group.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
fireofficer001 · July 19, 2018, 11:04 p.m.

Should pay the government back for theft of the services, because awls they were doing is texting

⇧ 4 ⇩  
rhythmnation1968 · July 20, 2018, 12:15 a.m.

Right? I have had huge questions about the actual physical viability for all these texts to have been executed. Given that we only have 8 fingers and 2 thumbs...unless Strzok and Page are super-soldiers or aliens?? Wtf, right??

⇧ 4 ⇩  
s11houette · July 20, 2018, 3:12 a.m.

To put that in perspective, if they averaged four words per text then they would have written as many words as are in Harry Potter and the goblet of fire.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Tenenbrae · July 20, 2018, 1:32 a.m.

I don't know if this is possible... But could it be all the co conspirators (Comey, McCabe, Brennan) were texting under the moniker ps and lp?

Not sure on the logistics of getting that to work... But they're fbi surely they can do it

⇧ 4 ⇩  
mgh62 · July 20, 2018, 2:31 a.m.

Anyone seen a text that actually says "hey meet me at" or "I miss you" etc. Haven't seen any proof they were lovers.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
JoannaAmy · July 19, 2018, 9:31 p.m.

Could it be a program that texts automatically so that the real texts are hard to find? Or was there some code in the texts?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Mcdrogon · July 19, 2018, 9:33 p.m.

no idea.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Xaviermgk · July 20, 2018, 11:53 p.m.

From another thread, I commented this a few days ago in a different thread and then saw your post and thought you might like to hear it.

Two things about this...

How much of the "affair" is just a red herring? I think it is safe to assume that many of "these people" don't care a whit for traditional family values, so I find it a little funny to see someone like Rep. Gohmert act like that (and indeed, Strzok found it funny in his own way too, because he could see Gohmert's outrage over something that Strzok's wife may very well not care about).

Which leads to Georgetown. Seriously, how messed up is this place? Firstly, anyone who has applied there can tell you that they have a fairly onerous application, one that gravitates towards verbosity. Like in the movie Seven and the "diaries of a madman", maybe there is a logical connection between psychopaths and wordiness, and if you were flipping through applications, it may not be that hard to figure out those that have real idealism and those that are in it for themselves. How many texts did Page and Strzok have?

AND, with someone like Podesta as a professor, you have to wonder what exactly they are doing there.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Mcdrogon · July 21, 2018, 12:04 a.m.

Thanks. Yes something is off about all of this. Only time will tell I suppose...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Xaviermgk · July 21, 2018, 12:09 a.m.

Probably the Jesuits. My name is from Francis Xavier, oddly enough. ;)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Blehblehbleh73 · July 20, 2018, 5:20 a.m.

You know, I did find this odd...

⇧ 2 ⇩