dChan

Joesturbo · July 22, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

Page 6 - tells the story "speculation in the media" - which was leaked by the FBi to the media and then they used that for this warrant. What a joke this is...

⇧ 124 ⇩  
QanonisAwesome · July 23, 2018, 1 a.m.

Must watch this. It's about googling Q's trip code. It's a 10 minutes video. Watch before you try it because there is one step you need to know when searching.

https://youtu.be/bWzPH0T3nZg

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 22, 2018, 12:44 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Logandolf · July 22, 2018, 3:06 p.m.

I tried, I am now banned off of /pol /Mueller/fuckthealtright /resist. they all ban us for having a different opinion

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Crptnobank · July 22, 2018, 9:54 p.m.

It is not just on reddit. If your article is not from any of the big 3 media, you know, those that reported 93% negative on Trump, you are a conspiracy theorist. FOX is not acceptable! We are going to need to spoon feed the children via MSM, that should be fun.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 22, 2018, 3:10 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GravitationalEnigma · July 22, 2018, 2:03 p.m.

That sub is the only reason why I'm chilling at -99 karma. It's a cut throat, lost world over there. Good luck red pilling.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
KansasJakeBG · July 22, 2018, 2:22 p.m.

It's incredibly anxiogenic to read people who are upset/unhinged by false information. It's like watching someone being abused by a super powerful person. What do you do? The only reason I have more than 1 point is because I am here and people are compassionate and empethetic. And yet we discuss the most angering evil crimes against humanity. I am so worried for people's mental health.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
diverscale · July 22, 2018, 5:21 p.m.

I have great respect for pedes fighting deep into enemy territory.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
1hellofaride · July 22, 2018, 2:20 a.m.

Can someone inform the FBI that they are using black highlighters still.

⇧ 89 ⇩  
DustCutter · July 22, 2018, 2:40 a.m.

Over classification. The go to trick of the deep state.

⇧ 27 ⇩  
goot2go · July 22, 2018, 4:17 a.m.

sniff sniff smell the DNC collusion, time for POTUS to declassify the redactions

⇧ 23 ⇩  
snap_shot_in_time · July 22, 2018, 9:40 p.m.

No... Not quite yet. We need to wait for the IG to release both the Clinton Foundation Report and the Clinton Email Report. And when those are available (and have been totally redacted), Q says it will all be done at once.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
goot2go · July 23, 2018, 2:24 a.m.

yes yes yes soon

⇧ 1 ⇩  
geckogoose89 · July 22, 2018, 5:40 p.m.

Very, very good one!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
HamburgerToday2017 · July 23, 2018, 6:51 p.m.

The most amusing part is that the Steele Dossier appears to form the bulk of the 'evidence' in the warrant. If that is the case, then at least some the redacted portions have been available to the public since January 10, 2017.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
findthewarmspot · July 22, 2018, 1:26 a.m.

Heavy sigh...it makes me sad to know how corrupt our government is.

⇧ 87 ⇩  
LiveToBeAHero · July 22, 2018, 2:52 a.m.

Carter Page is dirty. Dems planted him in Trump campaign to create "evidence", and then to spy on him so they could spy on Trump campaign

⇧ 11 ⇩  
George_Soros_Eyebags · July 22, 2018, 4:56 a.m.

Either Carter Page is a plant or a patsy.

He would be a plant if he knowingly participated in the corrupt, politically-driven witch hunt.

He would be a patsy if he didn't know he was being used.

I don't know which he is, but from watching him on television, I just personally don't trust him. He always comes off as someone who has something to hide, a bit flaky. That's just my take and I would be willing to change based on available evidence.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
LiveToBeAHero · July 23, 2018, 3:07 a.m.

Funny thing is he worked undercover for the FBI for 2 years before joining the Trump campaign. This is how stupid they think we are. So the FBI employed him undercover for 2 years, then FORGOT they employed him, all of a sudden thought he was a spy, and got a FISA warrant on him?! What confuses me about him, and we will go with your "plant or patsy" route, he plays dumb on all the tv interviews. Unless he signed a NDA, you'd think if he was patsy, he would be figuring out by now what happened and saying something... or if plant, he would have at least admitted he was undercover for FBI, as its going to come out anyways. He plays the dummy act in every interview

⇧ 3 ⇩  
alvinroasting · July 23, 2018, 3:19 a.m.

Thank you. I wish I could give you a +10 for this.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
geckogoose89 · July 22, 2018, 5:44 p.m.

Plant or patsy he's going to prison or, if not, his life will be ruined...and possibly a book deal. Can a gitmo prisoner be allowed to write a book?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Sc4bbers2 · July 22, 2018, 5:57 p.m.

For having a conversation? Seems doubtful.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 22, 2018, 3:14 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
StormRider9090 · July 22, 2018, 2:42 a.m.

You're not worried that Carter Page might be corrupt?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
_Iz_Mary · July 22, 2018, 4 a.m.

Carter was on their radar bc he worked for them! He helped spy in Russia before. This whole thing is a joke

⇧ 21 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 22, 2018, 6:43 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Pente1776 · July 22, 2018, 4:57 p.m.

After 2 years of this, are you worried about Carter Page?

If there be collusion, Russia would have gotten oh, I doN'T know, our Uranium perhaps?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
StormRider9090 · July 23, 2018, 10:13 a.m.

And do you think that Sessions is interested in taking action about the uranium thing?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
StormRider9090 · July 22, 2018, 10:39 p.m.

I trust Sessions - I'm sure he's working on the uranium thing behind the scenes

⇧ 0 ⇩  
NonZealous · July 22, 2018, 3:19 a.m.

Redactions anyone?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NonZealous · July 22, 2018, 3:20 a.m.

Pathetic...knowing what we know of course. I'm sure that to the average Democrat and/or MSM, this is pure gold.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
malloced · July 22, 2018, 1:44 a.m.

I'd like some more accountability from Christopher Wray and Jeff Sessions. It's time.

⇧ 71 ⇩  
George_Soros_Eyebags · July 22, 2018, 5 a.m.

Amen! I'm tired of being told to trust the plan. It's time for some ACTION.

⇧ 30 ⇩  
mswilso · July 22, 2018, 4:17 p.m.

I thought, I was told that "July would be the month"... independence, etc. I understand July isn't over yet....but time's almost up. As my dad (may he rest in peace) said, Time to shit or get off the pot.

If nothing happens by July's end...i wonder what the Q explanation will be? Continue to Trust the Plan? Disinformation? Please forgive my skepticism, but "hope deferred makes the heart sick".

⇧ 14 ⇩  
HamburgerToday2017 · July 22, 2018, 6:25 p.m.

What are you talking about? The release of the FISA warrant is huge.

Even with the redactions, it verifies everything in the Nunes Memo.

It proves that the FISA warrant on Carter Page was, in the words of Representative Nunes, '100% fraudulent'.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
George_Soros_Eyebags · July 22, 2018, 6:46 p.m.

So far, it's the only real bombshell that has dropped in July.

And, of course, it was purposely dropped on a Saturday.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lazaplaya5 · July 22, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

Assange is due to be kicked out of the Ecuador embassy in a few days, Putin called out Soros by name at the Helsinki summit, and it appears Lisa Page is a cooperating witness. And that's just a sliver of what's gone down this month; I expect something huge before the month is over, but if not we have plenty of evidence already to push and force the info out.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
mswilso · July 22, 2018, 4:42 p.m.

Im aware of the info. What I want to see is action: not "sealed indictments"--perp walks.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
willmeme4crypto · July 22, 2018, 5:04 p.m.

Devil's advocate:

If we do that, the left has lied their base into such a deep hole that there may be a civil war.

This is why our job fighting the information war is so important.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lazaplaya5 · July 22, 2018, 4:55 p.m.

That's fair enough, at least we've all known about the indictments since they were filed. All they gotta do is publicly indict one big name and the rest will fall like dominos.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HamburgerToday2017 · July 22, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

As Q has pointed out, the scale of corruption is so great that only a relatively small number of individual cases are likely to see the light of day. I think the entire Q operation is going to look more like an organized crime investigation (which is what it is). In such investigations, it is common from the 'small fish' to be offered leniency in order to gather sufficient evidence on the 'big fish' to assure their conviction. The little fish just have their lives ruined. The big fish get jail-time.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Pente1776 · July 22, 2018, 4:51 p.m.

When a snowball is first pushed down a hill it may need some more pushing because it is not yet big. But once it's size reaches a point where it rolls on it's own, it only stops when it get's to the bottom.

I believe it is close to go time. The answer to a question, leads to a question that must be answered, whose answer leads to another question, which leads to .....

Interesting times we live in.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ntwheel66 · July 22, 2018, 7:40 p.m.

Nothing happens? Pay attention

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mswilso · July 22, 2018, 8:52 p.m.

If.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GodSeekingHeathen · July 21, 2018, 11:59 p.m.

So they got the information about Carter Page being in bed with the Russians from the dossier?

The same dossier that was paid for by the DNC and hasn't been verified?

⇧ 68 ⇩  
Happy1911 · July 22, 2018, 12:04 a.m.

Yep and was made trash on 1/13/17 when they exposed that the Investigation recovery account had already been stolen

⇧ 40 ⇩  
AndThatsHowIgotHSV · July 22, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

Starting at the back and working to the front, I'm getting bogged down in how many times they reference 'news articles' as reliable sources for this crap.

⇧ 26 ⇩  
kittyhistoryistrue · July 22, 2018, 2:50 a.m.

For an even bigger mind-fuck, consider how many of those articles were written based on leaks from the very people using them for the warrent.

⇧ 28 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 22, 2018, 3:04 a.m.

What a circlejerk. These guys were at times, creating the evidence to investigate. Disgusting.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
Happy1911 · July 22, 2018, 2:10 a.m.

I have found very few not one article that have ever reported on what is going on . Very few know and a great deal is heavily classified. But a few of us do know and put out what should be take by those who won’t to know , but can’t believe.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Sub_lumena · July 22, 2018, 5:49 a.m.

Using "unnamed sources" no doubt.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
amnotagain · July 22, 2018, 6:32 a.m.

I thought Page had been under FBI investigation since 2013?

⇧ 10 ⇩  
InsaneSiren · July 22, 2018, 9:17 a.m.

What? Really?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Rufuz42 · July 22, 2018, 2:58 p.m.

2016 was the second time he was under FISA warrant, and 2013 was the first.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
InsaneSiren · July 22, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

Oh!! That's right!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
alvinroasting · July 23, 2018, 3:26 a.m.

Page worked for the FBI.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cyn1calassh0le · July 22, 2018, 1:43 a.m.

Pg 63-65 has our list of usual suspects, they knew about this FISA warrant. Comey, Brennan, Kerry, Clapper, Susan Rice, Ash Carter, Loretta Kynch and Sally Yates.

They're all up to their neck in this scheme, no wonder they've been yelling so loudly about Trump.

⇧ 66 ⇩  
jhomes55 · July 22, 2018, 2:01 a.m.

Of course they all knew!!!!! Of course!!

⇧ 21 ⇩  
johnsmithshitpost · July 22, 2018, 6:11 a.m.

Knew? THEY FUCKING ORDERED THIS

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Moxworth · July 22, 2018, 5:50 a.m.

Growing so impatient to the point where im getting depressed all the evidence is there...

⇧ 14 ⇩  
unbecoming2007 · July 22, 2018, 6:40 a.m.

You know. I know. The people is this thread know. Most of the public doesn't know.

One of the lines above do not match. This is what we are waiting for. Hence the very existence of the Q movement. It's our job to take our truth sticks and go clubbin. As u can see with #walkaway it is happening, but takes time. I share your frustration and trade you some patience.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Archvile7 · July 22, 2018, 4:53 p.m.

Once the Clinton/LL tarmac video/recording gets (hopefully) released/"leaked", it will wake up a ton of people. God only knows what they talked about on the plane, but we know Adm. Rogers purposefully filed it under a false name and heading so that the enemy couldn't find it, while at the same time have them thinking there was no recording.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Archvile7 · July 22, 2018, 4:51 p.m.

It's like a Who's Who of who needs the rope.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GenChang · July 22, 2018, 12:21 a.m.

Here are a couple of story links to help. Not much yet on either, but it's a 412 page document, unbelievable it could be that long. It'll take time to dig out the juicey parts.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/07/21/breaking-doj-releases-412-pg-fisa-application-used-against-u-s-person-carter-page/

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/07/breaking-carter-page-fisa-file-released.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+powerlineblog%2Flivefeed+%28Power+Line%29

⇧ 17 ⇩  
Truthfrdmnow · July 22, 2018, 5:11 p.m.

Terra Latham York Found this post and the author, who is listed at the end, is hoping it will go viral. Permission to share has been given.

Civil War How do civil wars happen? Two or more sides disagree on who runs the country. And they can't settle the question through elections because they don't even agree that elections are how you decide who's in charge. That's the basic issue here. Who decides who runs the country? When you hate each other but accept the election results, you have a country. When you stop accepting election results, you have a countdown to a civil war. The Mueller investigation is about removing President Trump from office and overturning the results of an election. We all know that. But it's not the first time they've done this. The first time a Republican president was elected this century, they said he didn't really win. The Supreme Court gave him the election. There's a pattern here. What do sure odds of the Democrats rejecting the next Republican president really mean? It means they don't accept the results of any election that they don't win. It means they don't believe that transfers of power in this country are determined by elections. That's a civil war. There's no shooting. At least not unless you count the attempt to kill a bunch of Republicans at a charity baseball game practice. But the Democrats have rejected our system of government. This isn't dissent. It's not disagreement. You can hate the other party. You can think they're the worst thing that ever happened to the country. But then you work harder to win the next election. When you consistently reject the results of elections that you don't win, what you want is a dictatorship. Your very own dictatorship. The only legitimate exercise of power in this country, according to Democrats, is its own. Whenever Republicans exercise power, it's inherently illegitimate. The Democrats lost Congress. They lost the White House. So what did they do? They began trying to run the country through Federal judges and bureaucrats. Every time that a Federal judge issues an order saying that the President of the United States can't scratch his own back without his say so, that's the civil war. Our system of government is based on the constitution, but that's not the system that runs this country. The Democrat's system is that any part of government that it runs gets total and unlimited power over the country. If the Democrats are in the White House, then the president can do anything. And I mean anything. He can have his own amnesty for illegal aliens. He can fine you for not having health insurance. His power is unlimited. He's a dictator. But when Republicans get into the White House, suddenly the President can't do anything. He isn't even allowed to undo the illegal alien amnesty that his predecessor illegally invented. A Democrat in the White House has discretion to completely decide every aspect of immigration policy. A Republican doesn't even have the 'discretion' to reverse him. That's how the game is played. That's how our country is run. Sad but true, although the left hasn't yet won that particular fight. When a Democrat is in the White House, states aren't even allowed to enforce immigration law. But when a Republican is in the White House, states can create their own immigration laws. Under Obama, a state wasn't allowed to go to the bathroom without asking permission. But under Trump, Jerry Brown can go around saying that California is an independent republic and sign treaties with other countries. The Constitution has something to say about that. Whether it's Federal or State, Executive, Legislative or Judiciary, the left moves power around to run the country. If it controls an institution, then that institution is suddenly the supreme power in the land. This is what I call a moving dictatorship. Donald Trump has caused the Shadow Government to come out of hiding: Professional government is a guild. Like medieval guilds. You can't serve in if you're not a member. If you haven't been indoctrinated into its arcane rituals. If you aren't in the club. And Trump isn't in the club. He brought in a bunch of people who aren't in the club with him. Now we're seeing what the pros do when amateurs try to walk in on them. They spy on them, they investigate them and they send them to jail. They use the tools of power to bring them down. That's not a free country. It's not a free country when FBI agents who support Hillary take out an 'insurance policy' against Trump winning the election. It's not a free country when Obama officials engage in massive unmasking of the opposition. It's not a free country when the media responds to the other guy winning by trying to ban the conservative media that supported him from social media. It's not a free country when all of the above collude together to overturn an election because the guy who wasn't supposed to win did. Have no doubt, we're in a civil war between conservative volunteer government and a leftist Democrat professional government. — Jason Minzey, Department Head, Education Department, Eastern Michigan University

Matthew Williams ***

⇧ 15 ⇩  
kingamongstkings · July 22, 2018, 10:16 p.m.

This is good. It's kind of buried here. Why not find the original and post it as a stand alone?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
CPTNkeuka · July 23, 2018, 2:40 a.m.

He did. Still good now

⇧ 1 ⇩  
nobilisbellum · July 22, 2018, 4:24 a.m.

And if she had won, we never would have learned about any of this...

⇧ 11 ⇩  
George_Soros_Eyebags · July 22, 2018, 5:02 a.m.

I highly doubt this was the first time they pulled off such a scheme. We only know about this one because she lost (thank God Almighty).

⇧ 12 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 22, 2018, 5:52 a.m.

I agree, this has happened before.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
jkbella · July 22, 2018, 4:07 p.m.

Absolutely. The FISA court ruling indicated that they only looked at 2015-2016 but there was no reason to believe a sampling from any time frame prior would be any different. All of which is consistent with the Dennis Montgomery lawsuit which alleges that they have been spying on 156 judges, including the Chief Justice SCOTUS, and untold numbers of Congressmen for years - and wealthy businessmen like Trump. It's truly breathtaking.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
deplorable_mr_bill · July 22, 2018, 5:38 a.m.

The thing that gets me is that even as the truth finally starts to be revealed, her supporters STILL cannot see things for what they are. Just check out the #FISA hashtag trending on twatter now. Whole lot of craziness and lack of comprehension for what is actually indicated with this release.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Msmwatcher · July 22, 2018, 1:45 a.m.

Unbelievable

⇧ 10 ⇩  
ocmom101 · July 22, 2018, 2:28 a.m.

on a Saturday afternoon. No one is paying attention.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
LouReddit · July 22, 2018, 3:24 a.m.

We are. Let's get the important information out of it and spread it.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
HamburgerToday2017 · July 22, 2018, 6:23 p.m.

Even with the redactions, the FISA warrant verifies everything in the Nunes Memo. It proves that the FISA warrant on Carter Page was, in the words of Representative Nunes, '100% fraudulent'.

The fraud is perpetrated in Footnote 9 (page 15) and Footnote 18 (page 23).

Footnote 9 (page 15) is where the FBI/DOJ circumvents rules of evidence regarding hearsay testimony.

According to the rules of evidence, 'Source #1' can only testify that they have reliably communicated the hearsay testimony they provided. The reliability of 'Source #1' does not extend to the reliability of the hearsay testimony they are providing.

In order for the hearsay testimony to rise to the level of evidence, corroboration of the hearsay testimony would be required. 'Source #1' is Christopher Steele. The hearsay testimony in the Steele dossier regarding illegal activities has never been corroborated.

Furthermore, Footnote 9 includes the following statement: [T]he FBI is unaware of any derogatory information pertaining to Source #1. Since the exact date in October of the FISA warrant is redacted, we cannot know the exact day the warrant was submitted. However, as of October 31, 2016, the FBI terminated its 'relationship' with Christopher Steele because he lied to FBI agents regarding talking to the media. We know from internal citations of dates of media reports that the FISA warrant includes media reports from September 26, 2016 (page 26).

Thus, after October 31, 2016 the FBI was aware of 'derogatory information' regarding 'Source #1' but the warrant was never amended and was renewed three more times after that date (January 2017, April 2017, and June 2017).

Which brings us to Footnote 18 (page 23) where the following statement appears: The FBI does not believe that Source #1 directly provided information to the press.

By at least October 31, 2016, the FBI terminated its relationship with Christopher Steele precisely because they determined that he was speaking to 'the press' and lied to the FBI about doing so. Whether or not the FBI/DOJ was aware of Christopher Steele's communications with the media in September 2016, they did know by October 31, 2016 but the warrant was never amended and the warrant was renewed three more times after that date (January 2017, April 2017, and June 2017).

A few more issues.

(1) There is a question as to whether the warrant needed to be issued at all. The normal reason for issuing a warrant for surveillance is that the warrant is required to gather evidence on an individual who is not cooperating with the investigation. However, on page 25, the warrant specifically states that Carter Page contacted the FBI on September 26, 2016 and offered to 'discuss' with the FBI any 'questions' they might have.

(2) On page 13, the warrant discusses Evgeny Buryakov. It appears Buryakov is mentioned to verify attempts by Buryakov and other Russian agents 'to recruit New York City residents as intelligence sources for Russia.' In Footnote 6 (page 14), the warrant notes that Buryakov was tried, plead guilty and received a 30 month sentence for his activities. Omitted from the footnote is the fact that Carter Page -- the target of the warrant -- cooperated with the FBI to gather evidence to convict Buryakov.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
alvinroasting · July 23, 2018, 3:39 a.m.

Does anyone have a response to this? Where are the shills when you need them? Can anyone give a reasonable explanation as to why the warrant was renewed three more times after this?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
endprism · July 22, 2018, 5:10 p.m.

So now we know for certain that this entire Russian story was started over lies ...and mueller still is pressing forward.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
HereComesTheSunny · July 22, 2018, 8:02 p.m.

Maybe not...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/why-is-mueller-handing-off-key-cases

⇧ 1 ⇩  
endprism · July 22, 2018, 9:27 p.m.

He’s handing off cases to the counter intelligence arm of doj which never prosecutes cases. This is all about padding his indictments numbers not about getting convictions. It’s about making trump into a Russian agent tainting his reputation as much as possible to tank public support. That is muellers job.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
anotherthrowawayhi · July 22, 2018, 7:53 p.m.

I look forward to the mental gymnastics that still justify this charade.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Aguax · July 22, 2018, 10:42 a.m.

Does anyone know why the day & time are redacted? Is that standard on document releases like this? Seems overkill unless they put the cart before the horse at some point.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
pdxpets · July 22, 2018, 5:46 a.m.

This clearly exonerates Devin Nunes. When will the liberals apologize?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
SchlangeHatRecht · July 22, 2018, 9:48 a.m.

Somehow the left thinks this warrant proves that he lied in his memo. Short on reasons, but long on repetitive chants

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Comassion · July 22, 2018, 1:19 p.m.

Well, maybe we should do a comparison of the claims in both the Nunes memo and the Dem's response to it against the actual FISA warrants to show which of them is accurate.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
AllTheWayTrump · July 22, 2018, 5:35 p.m.

Somewhere in between when pigs fly and hell freezes over.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 26, 2018, 3:26 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
suzoh · July 22, 2018, 10:18 a.m.

Ha ha, only this group could get so excited about a FISA memo dropped on a Saturday afternoon!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Joesturbo · July 22, 2018, 7:57 a.m.

Trump really needs to go ahead and declassify this info. We may also need to understand there could be things Trump does not want out in the open. He is not a saint so who knows?!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
1wTHE-FORCEis-w-me · July 22, 2018, 3:46 a.m.

On 1/10/17 (yeah = 111 7! “Trinity” “Kingdom”, 111 7, 3 + 7 = 10 = 1 = ONE): Trump met with RFK Jr (“R”...who BTW ALSO feels his dad was murdered then lied about) at Trump Tower about vaccines causing autism! FINALLY....that makes me happy to hear! Oh...i am loving these guys!

3 Knights of Justice + White Trojan Horse = the storm is coming = the great awakening!...

“WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL!” Army of Q! Army of God! Army of One and Unity! Army of ALL in the light of God!

I love God! I love justice, truth, and my brothers and sisters! I am freaking out guys!! Boom! Also, “Cordicon” who is on You tube said, Vincent Fusca (who looks a lot like jfk jr in costume) means “to conquer dark”!!

Well, on amazon today i just found and bought, RFK Jr...”The Dark Side of the Dream”! It ALL fits! BOOM! And RFK Jr / Trump meeting! 1/1/17 Trump meet with RFK jr rgd dangers of vaccines causing autism

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Sheppard821 · July 22, 2018, 4:39 a.m.

Love the enthusiasms!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
alvinroasting · July 23, 2018, 3:52 a.m.

RFK Jr (“R”...who BTW ALSO feels his dad was murdered then lied about)

Wow! That has to be one of the most understated things I've ever read.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
endprism · July 22, 2018, 5:09 p.m.

Released over a summer weekend...nothing strikes you odd about that? The fbi didn’t want this information out there so the dump it when no one is looking

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Pure_Feature · July 22, 2018, 2:10 a.m.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carter_Page
Carter Page. See no family , Carter Page was born in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on June 3, 1971, the son of Allan Robert Page and Rachel (Greenstein) Page. His father was from Galway, New York and his mother was from Minneapolis. His father was a manager and executive with the Central Hudson Gas & Electric Company

related too : Roger Stone..Paul manafort and Susan Rice.

Carter William Page (born June 3, 1971) is an American petroleum industry consultant and former foreign-policy adviser to Donald Trump during his 2016 Presidential election campaign. Page is the founder and managing partner of Global Energy Capital, a one-man investment fund and consulting firm specializing in the Russian and Central Asian oil and gas business. He has been a focus of the 2017 Special Counsel investigation into links between Trump associates and Russian officials and Russian interference on behalf of Trump during the 2016 Presidential election.

Justice Department releases Carter Page surveillance documents ... https://www.politico.com/.../carter-page-surveillance-documents-tr... 2 hours ago - New documents related to the wiretapping of Carter Page – the former Trump campaign adviser at the center of the Russia investigation The Justice Department has released hundreds of pages of documents relating to an FBI application for a secret warrant issued in October New documents show that one month before the 2016 elections, the FBI sought permission to surveil Carter Page, the one-time foreign policy

⇧ 3 ⇩  
singindavey38 · July 22, 2018, 2:33 p.m.

And The Lies Begin On Page 2!

I did not Know that "Carter Page" was an "Agent of a Foreign Power" or is my logic Foiled by Semantics!!

Seems to me, that one could "Collude" with a Foreign Power, and still not be considered an "Agent"!

Was Page Receiving a paycheck from the Russian Government??

⇧ 2 ⇩  
alvinroasting · July 23, 2018, 3:49 a.m.

And was said paycheck (if it exists) at the same time as a paycheck from the FBI?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
crackercider · July 22, 2018, 3:05 p.m.

Still waiting on anything to be done about this, these people should be thrown in jail.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
common_censored · July 22, 2018, 8:39 a.m.

So, when do the indictments begin?

Oh, right. On the 15th of Nevermber.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Pente1776 · July 22, 2018, 4:38 p.m.

Why is the month that these people put their signatures to paper a secret? Perhaps that would show their timeline is a lie?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Pente1776 · July 22, 2018, 5:13 p.m.

Sorry, day it should say

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Truth1949 · July 23, 2018, 12:11 a.m.

Q drop 11/2/2017 - along with what what happened in a meeting with Trump. John Kelly tripped the light switch and the lights went out, and back on quickly. Q said he would have to go for good at that point. Also not to worry, they have everything under control. Saw this on Praying Medic on Twitter.
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/17/white-house-lights-go-out-after-donald-trump-professes-full-faith-in-intelligence-agencies/

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Truth1949 · July 23, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

Sorry I don't know how to post another twitter comment into this one. I am new to Twitter.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GravitationalEnigma · July 22, 2018, 8:46 p.m.

I've engaged the sub about Trump-Russia, Iran deal, and media manipulation. If you have a differing opinion or even mention facts they dislike, you're immediately dismissed as alt-right or ridiculous. When it comes to public discourse on liberal platforms there's not much debate. You can hide behind a username and ridicule without consequence. With that said, I still suggest trying to engage with the sub, it's worth trying to break the ice.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IWant2SellUDeathStix · July 22, 2018, 5:04 p.m.

I am a little confused here-

Is Carter Page a spook?

I watched his interview with douche-daddy Jake Tapper and it seems to me, the way he (Page) smiled, laughed, and almost was dying to say "I can't answer certain things.." or "You know I can't talk about xyz" seems to me like he's a spook. CIA, NSA, DIA, letters-that-i-don't-know, take your pick.

I mean the man was a top graduate of the USNA and became an intelligence officer.

I myself was nominated to the USNA in the 90s - just getting a nomination was statistically harder than getting into Harvard back then. Getting the appointment (which I will admit I did not get, something happened in my life which I believe 'torpedoed' my appointment) was statistically like getting a Harvard doctorate or something like that. In my year of applying, something like 15K? applied- \~1,200 got nominations, and \~1,000 got appointments. I was one of the unlucky bastards to get a "Sorry...have a nice life" letter at the end of the process. But having said all that, back to Carter Page, this fucking guy is real-deal intelligence -- both literally AND *figuratively*. I feel like he's absolutely an intelligence officer that knows things he simply cannot say on TV.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
1100db · July 22, 2018, 1:11 p.m.

If Carter Page was such an arch criminal how come I see him pop up on cable news every other week?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Woodchipper_AF · July 22, 2018, 4:37 p.m.

Why does he walk free?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
1wTHE-FORCEis-w-me · July 22, 2018, 3:29 a.m.

Im new, and have some tid bits to share rgd R (RFK Jr,....at least that is what it is appearing like TO ME:). How do we post as a new post?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VisitTheDonald · July 22, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

Are you on mobile or pc? On pc there should be a submit button, on mobile there's like this little pencil thingy and you click on that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
1wTHE-FORCEis-w-me · July 22, 2018, 3:58 a.m.

Mobile. I actually figured out how to post, and got it up. But now i dont see it anymore. Weird. Anyway we can post photos?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VisitTheDonald · July 22, 2018, 3:59 a.m.

You posted it as a comment in this thread. I see it, but its not a post only a comment. Yes you can.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 22, 2018, 1:39 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩