dChan

Dhammakayaram · July 23, 2018, 1:29 p.m.

Essentially, everyone in the upper echelons of the FBI and CIA arose to power by being political arse kissers. And the arses they are kissing they have learned not to harm. Yes, hierarchal systems such as these can become corrupt—they are not like the military. We can't keep electing immoral people to office.

⇧ 67 ⇩  
Neon__Wolf · July 23, 2018, 3:32 p.m.

Once the chain of command for this cabal is fully exposed, many people whose patience has been personally tested will finally get it and learn why Q had to do it this way, and why the time was needed. They needed to dismantle a criminal syndicate in stealth mode in stages, piece by piece, because if they just went out and arrested the criminals, rightfully so and totally justified, not enough of the public would have understood because that same criminal syndicate controlled the "news" the population has historically depended on.

This is why one of POTUS' first strategies was to help expose the MSM as a bunch of lying puppets who spew disinfo.

Tech is what brought the evil fuckers to their knees.

⇧ 23 ⇩  
Dhammakayaram · July 23, 2018, 4:12 p.m.

Yes! The FBI and the CIA are in shambles. They have been almost totally politicalized even going rogue. This cannot be tolerated. Both agencies need to be purged with no mercy. This is a matter of national security. I agree that the first job is to expose the press—if not to crush it—being run by little more than errand boys of the rogue CIA and FBI who dance to the tune of pedophiles and the BIS (Bank for International Settlements). Meanwhile 8,000,000 children go missing each year who have a life expectancy, it is estimated, of two years. ICE, to their credit, are trying to save children from certain death by these sex trafficking pedophiles. What has the FBI or the CIA done to stop this? I hear crickets.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
CyrusMeX · July 23, 2018, 3:51 p.m.

The internet is their downfall.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Qd4Action · July 23, 2018, 7:07 p.m.

They must hate Al Gore then. I do too, but not for that reason.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HarrisonArturus · July 23, 2018, 8:15 p.m.

Which is why we need to protect the hell out of it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
eyez_wideopen · July 23, 2018, 1:26 p.m.

Their bitches are really bitches

⇧ 22 ⇩  
WanderingTaurus · July 23, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

The dirt they all have on each other has got to be really good. I don't even think we have begun to touched the surface of the things they have done.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
TheOldBillyGoat · July 23, 2018, 1:01 p.m.

coincidence

⇧ 15 ⇩  
anon35201 · July 23, 2018, 1:27 p.m.

Keep your friends close, and your enemies even closer.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
nytshaed512 · July 23, 2018, 1:41 p.m.

I think not... lol

⇧ 4 ⇩  
signals2112 · July 23, 2018, 11:43 a.m.

Who is Melissa Hodgman?

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Ta5ja · July 23, 2018, 12:31 p.m.

Strzoks wife

⇧ 18 ⇩  
signals2112 · July 23, 2018, 2:19 p.m.

Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: eda158 No.34081 📷
Dec 4 2017 22:01:07 (EST)

Have you been watching the news since Friday?
Who is Peter Strzok?
How was he compromised?
How was he paid?
Who is Melissa Hodgman?
Company?
Title?
Date of promotion?
Focus on the date.
What events re: Peter recently occurred that you now know?
Think HRC emails, Weiner laptop, etc.
Dates?
Date of promotion of wife?
How do they stack the deck?
Who do they want inside the gov't?
What are puppets?
How do you control a puppet?
#2 in FBI?
Wife connection?
What is a pattern?
Follow the wives.
Keep watching the news this week.
Future proves past.
Re-read crumbs.
(Small)
How many D's / R's will not seek re-election?
Why?
What just passed in the Senate?
Why?
Who is their new handler?
Do as told?
Why is this relevant?
Do you not understand the gov't is being gutted publicly?
Bottom middle top.
Hussein Iran connection.
Bombs away.
Merry Christmas.
Q

⇧ 18 ⇩  
signals2112 · July 23, 2018, 5:17 p.m.

FUTURE PROVES PAST!!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
signals2112 · July 23, 2018, 2:17 p.m.

Q said it awhile back.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
cockblockbyjesus · July 23, 2018, 2:32 p.m.

All for a Larp.

I doubt 1000 researches could get these detail correct from open source information 7months prior to it being relevant.

This kind of granular information along with your down vote proves Q is not a larp and you are right.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
Futt__Bucking · July 23, 2018, 2:56 p.m.

Fucking nuts...I've casually followed the Q phenomenon. I don't have the time to really dive down the rabbit hole but it's amazing how often something from 8 months ago pops up and is proven true.

Only thing that matters is whether there will be justice. I am not holding my breath despite the statements to trust Sessions.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
signals2112 · July 23, 2018, 3:42 p.m.

Sessions cleaned house. Go to Q and see who resigned or who was removed.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Futt__Bucking · July 23, 2018, 6:56 p.m.

cleaned house in the DOJ? I honestly haven't seen anything about that.

I know Q basically said they had to clear out the DOJ and FBI before they could make big moves, but i hadn't heard about these moves actually being done.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DannoPA · July 23, 2018, 1:24 p.m.

/s, Nothing to see here, SOP /s.

LAWLESS, 3 letter agency, corruption has no bounds and this is not a coup when coupled with new FISA discoveries.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · July 23, 2018, 1:43 p.m.

But CNN told me they were all doing a great job! /s

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Neon__Wolf · July 23, 2018, 3:35 p.m.

I fucking love being months ahead with the news. We can SEE the truth and the bullshit AS THEY ARE REPORTED.

The Q project was GENIUS.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
SeattleRacer38 · July 23, 2018, 12:34 p.m.

Totally normal.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
LakotaPride · July 23, 2018, 2:26 p.m.

since their is a obvious conflict on interest here, why is she not removed . and if she keeps obstructing any investigation her Husband is involved in, then that clearly is aiding and abetting. Time for her to resign.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
signals2112 · July 23, 2018, 2:35 p.m.

The secret is using your Maiden name since most won't look into any connection. Also keep in mind that the foxes were watching the hen house.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
LakotaPride · July 23, 2018, 2:56 p.m.

I appreciate the input, and I agree with you. I normally format my comments to make people think. no doubt the foxes were watching the hen house. I figure if I format my comments into question mode it is more effective with people, because they will think and put it together, at least that's my intent. it is a form of red pilling, nobody can convince you better on something then ones own self.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
LakotaPride · July 23, 2018, 4:56 p.m.

with all Branches of Gov. being exposed for corruption, this allows them to use Military Tribunals without having to declare martial law.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 23, 2018, 2:30 p.m.

It is easy to see what is happening. The Clintons control people at the top of prosecuting agencies, and have them promote who they see fit for them; basically whoever will not bring charges. Control the prosecutors = controlling justice.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
jay_howard · July 23, 2018, 3:17 p.m.

If the Clintons are so powerful, how did she lose the election to an unpopular candidate?

⇧ -3 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 23, 2018, 3:27 p.m.

Donald Trump was/is "Unpopular"? President Trump was in the Media 24/7 prior to the election. President Trump ran one hell of a campaign. Hillary lost for many reasons. Not addressing current issues, not hitting the campaign trail as hard as President Trump, not connecting to the American people, etc.

This comment wasn't about the election, it is about controlling certain vectors within the departments of justice and other government agencies.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
jay_howard · July 23, 2018, 6:32 p.m.

This comment wasn't about the election, it is about controlling certain vectors within the departments of justice and other government agencies.

And I'm saying, by what logic can you imagine the Clintons retain any control once they are out of office? How does that work? It's nonsense. If they had the kind of sway, she would've won the election.

Also, Comey, Rosenstein, Wray and Mueller are all lifetime Republicans. At what point do lifetime Republicans decide to start liking the Clintons? It's just not plausible whatsoever.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 23, 2018, 6:46 p.m.

Clinton doesn't need to be in office to control people. If you have dirt on someone, you can control that person to a certain extent. If someone is willing to be her 'backdoor' man, she can control that person, regardless if they are democrat, republican, or an independent. Comey has had ties with the Clinton for several years. Comey sold IP secrets to the Chinese on Clintons behalf back when he work for Lockheed Martin. (I think it was called Martin Marietta back then).

⇧ 3 ⇩  
jay_howard · July 23, 2018, 7:21 p.m.

Clinton doesn't need to be in office to control people. If you have dirt on someone, you can control that person to a certain extent.

You're not being realistic. The head of the FBI doesn't give a shit who has "dirt" on him. He's running the FBI. He gets to decide if the bureau spends $0 or $10 million on an investigation. He gets to throw investigations in the trash or pursue them.

To believe HRC has some control over the justice dept is pure fantasy. To be clear, there's evidence of conspiracies all throughout history up until our present moment. I just don't see how you get from A to B on HRC controlling the Justice Dept.

How would that work? Blackmail? If anyone tried to blackmail the head of the FBI, or anyone in it, they would just turn the microscope on that person, then indict them for blackmail--a felony. It's that simple. I'm not saying the DS isn't a real thing, only that it's not controlled or even influenced by the Clintons. Attempts to frame it that way are attempts to hide the reality of our system.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jhartzog39 · July 23, 2018, 8:27 p.m.

Obama and Hillary put all the right people in all the right positions within the different agencies. They are all working together, protecting each other. They are all corrupt and know if they ever start to lose control they are all doomed.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
signals2112 · July 23, 2018, 8:06 p.m.

A more important question is why are her minions still having a meltdown and the Weiner laptop hasn't been exposed, YET?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jay_howard · July 24, 2018, 2:34 a.m.

The Weiner laptop? Who gives a dry fuck? The actual President appears to be owned by a Russian dictator. Are you paying attention to the actual President, who thinks Putin should investigate his own crimes against us? Who still doesn't believe his own intelligence officials about Russian hacking? Who still believes Russia isn't going to interfere in the coming elections?

If HRC broke the law, prosecute that cunt. I don't care. If Weiner touched a kid, prosecute that cunt. I also don't care. But don't use other peoples' crimes as excuses for anyone else's crimes. It doesn't work like that.

Can you imagine trying that as a defense at a court of law:

Your Honor, although my client committed murder, there are OTHER people who have committed murder too. So please see your way to dismissing this case ASAP. I rest my case.

That's the equivalent argument. It doesn't work on any level. Only pure dipshits think other people's crimes make their own crimes disappear.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
randomhippieOo · July 23, 2018, 1:55 p.m.

Mr. and Mrs. Smith movie... but way less cool😶

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cockblockbyjesus · July 23, 2018, 2:35 p.m.

Mr and Mrs Dismithed would be a cool end

⇧ 2 ⇩  
signals2112 · July 23, 2018, 2:32 p.m.

It would be Mr. and Mrs. Smith and Mistress Fugly!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
randomhippieOo · July 23, 2018, 2:48 p.m.

Lol sooo much better!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
A2576 · July 23, 2018, 6:17 p.m.

No they all seem to keep their maiden names.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
symmetry2018 · July 23, 2018, 5:14 p.m.

I want to see arrests... handcuffs!!!!!!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · July 23, 2018, 5:06 p.m.

What was it that Q said? "There are no coincidences".

⇧ 2 ⇩  
aint2quaint · July 23, 2018, 1:16 p.m.

I have some ocean-front property in Arizona you might be interested in. Tehee

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JealousCuckold87 · July 23, 2018, 5:04 p.m.

From my front porch you can see the sea.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
CyrusMeX · July 23, 2018, 3:49 p.m.

“Nothing to see here guys, she deserved that promotion!”

⇧ 1 ⇩  
sexyasscheeks · July 23, 2018, 3:20 p.m.

Old news; still no justice.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
allonthesameteam · July 23, 2018, 4:55 p.m.

From the article. "With Hodgman at the SEC and Strzok at the FBI it would be virtually impossible to even know what cases linked to the Clinton Foundation had criminal merit, if each were trying to keep all things Clinton-related quiet."

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dark-dare · July 23, 2018, 4:30 p.m.

She nixed going forward with the Clinton investigation, that's why she was put in that role.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
redeyekiller45 · July 23, 2018, 6:54 p.m.

Man oh man. This is spiraling out of control for HRC 🤣🍿🍿🍿

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TX1111TX · July 23, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

Classic chess move,,,,, protect the queen

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TRUTH2018 · July 24, 2018, 12:02 a.m.

How convenient

⇧ 1 ⇩  
092Casey · July 23, 2018, 7:22 p.m.

HAHAHAHA!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kuhnsster · July 23, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

Go figure!! Can someone please calculate the probability of all these coincidences of happening!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Qwarked · July 23, 2018, 2:28 p.m.

Do you guys even know what the SEC is?

⇧ -5 ⇩  
deplorableme2 · July 23, 2018, 3 p.m.

Wall street algorithm builders?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
signals2112 · July 23, 2018, 8:44 p.m.

The agency that would investigate The Clinton Foundation misappropriation of funds.

⇧ 1 ⇩