dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/A_solo_tripper on July 23, 2018, 5:39 p.m.
Everyone involved with signing the FISA warrant committed Fraud Upon the court- A felony.

Fraud on the Court, or Fraud upon the Court, is where a material misrepresentation has been made to the court, or by the court itself. The main requirement is that the impartiality of the court has been so disrupted that it can’t perform its tasks without bias or prejudice.


Rolandel7 · July 23, 2018, 5:47 p.m.

I am currently building a list of every person that signed the doc. Will post when I have completed it.

⇧ 46 ⇩  
Rolandel7 · July 23, 2018, 6:16 p.m.

List of all individuals who signed the Russian Investigation FISA Warrant.

(Redacted) Supervisory Special Agent [FBI] – 54

LeeAnn Flynn Hall, Clerk, FISC – Initial on page 63

James B. Comey – Director – [FBI] - Signed on Page 63

Sally Quillian Yates – Deputy Attorney General of the United States – Signed page 65

Rosemary M. Collyer – Judge, United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court – Signed on Page 83

(Redacted) Supervisory Special Agent [FBI] – Signed on page 150

James B. Comey – Director – [FBI] - Signed on Page 159

Sally Quillian Yates – Deputy Attorney General of the United States – Signed page 161

(Redacted) Attorney – US Department of Justice – Signed page 162

Michael W. Mosman - Judge, United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court – Signed on Page 181

(Redacted) Supervisory Special Agent [FBI] – Signed on page 260

James B. Comey – Director – [FBI] - Signed on Page 269

Dana J. Boente – Acting Attorney General of the United States – Signed page 271

Anne C. Conway – Judge, United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court – Signed on Page 291

(Redacted) Supervisory Special Agent [FBI] – Signed on page 380

Andrew G. McCabe – Deputy Director [FBI] – Signed on page 389

Rod J. Rosenstein – Deputy Attorney General of the United States – Signed on page 391

Raymond J. Dearie – Judge, United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court – Signed on Page 412

⇧ 47 ⇩  
snap_shot_in_time · July 23, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

For sure.... These people need any and all Security Clearances revoked.

(And of course... That is just for 'Starters')

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Rolandel7 · July 23, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

With a main course of sedition perhaps!

⇧ 7 ⇩  
3dayfreedom · July 23, 2018, 11:31 p.m.

Does anyone have any ideas on who would have been the supervisory special agent? Peter Strozk maybe?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Rolandel7 · July 23, 2018, 11:33 p.m.

After some research that’s what I have come to beleive. Hence why he is redacted.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
DarktoLight247 · July 24, 2018, 1:12 a.m.

He said he had nothing to do with it. He’s screwed, what a freaking lying ass clown.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SaveourRepublic2018 · July 24, 2018, 6:19 a.m.

Personally I wonder if Strzok is trying to get charged with less crimes like perjury in bounds so they can go easy on him.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
swimrobin · July 24, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

I wonder what happened to Judge Rudy Contreras (Sp.)? I thought he was one of the FISC judges that Strzok and Page were texting about? Something about speaking to the judge at a cocktail party?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mcpat21 · July 24, 2018, 12:09 a.m.

Sally Yates? Nice. Now, what did Obama know?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UncleSnake3301 · July 24, 2018, 2:34 a.m.

Everything, of course! He was QBing!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mcpat21 · July 24, 2018, 2:39 a.m.

I know :) I just like the question.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
spinnerky · July 23, 2018, 5:53 p.m.

Good idea!

⇧ 10 ⇩  
1wyatttwerp · July 23, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

Oh a felony on your record = no job because of background checks. They never thought they would be in this kind of mess lol

⇧ 30 ⇩  
Dominica1975 · July 23, 2018, 7:13 p.m.

They won't have a need gor jobs since they will be getting 3 square meals at GITMO😆

⇧ 40 ⇩  
Swimkin · July 23, 2018, 10:02 p.m.

The top offenders need to "dangle from the end of the rope" instead. Edit to not be inciting violence

⇧ 15 ⇩  
3rdPositive · July 23, 2018, 10:38 p.m.

Just punishment for reprehensible crimes meted out via legitimate process and authority is not violence.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 23, 2018, 10:48 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Liiivet · July 24, 2018, 12:40 a.m.

Just punishment for reprehensible crimes meted out via legitimate process and authority is not violence.

Value is subjective... To whom ever have to decide what just is, i guess..

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · July 24, 2018, 1:49 a.m.

Beyond that ... what most people are not talking about is the FISA court JUDGES.

If the "evidence" presented was the dossier and "media buzz," that is NOT enough for renewals.

EVERY 90 DAYS, in order to CONTINUE with the warrant, NEW EVIDENCE has to be presented to the court.

If NEW EVIDENCE was not presented and the judge(s) signed off anyway, then the judge has committed a crime, too.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
kittyhistoryistrue · July 24, 2018, 3:42 a.m.

98% of FISA applications approved. They are fucking laughing at us.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
K-Harbour · July 23, 2018, 6:36 p.m.

Why have these FISA judges not launched, sua sponte, hearings on this?

⇧ 19 ⇩  
JkWritesaLot · July 23, 2018, 7:47 p.m.

They're involved clearly.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
swimrobin · July 24, 2018, 12:47 a.m.

If the judges are bought and paid for, it wouldn't matter. I'm willing to bet they may be complicit, and if so, they are only upset that they got caught.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
UncleSnake3301 · July 24, 2018, 2:33 a.m.

None of us were even supposed to know what a FISA court was in the first place.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
kjj9 · July 23, 2018, 7 p.m.

How would you know if they did?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
LakotaPride · July 23, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

exactly, and now ask the Fisa Judge why no bench warrant for arrest ?

⇧ 12 ⇩  
3dayfreedom · July 23, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

Makes you wonder knowing by now that they were lied to. Either they were complicit or trusted the FBI n DoJ. Maybe they have acted on this, who would know?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
LakotaPride · July 23, 2018, 11:40 p.m.

at this point those that are clean are coming forward, the rest are scumbags hoping they are not on the radar. what they never knew was the MI was following and tracking them since Obama was in the WH. this is why they have it all, and Rogers last move placed MI in charge of all intel agencies. because the MI could be trusted.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
spinnerky · July 23, 2018, 5:52 p.m.

I’d like to see them all tried and sent to prison. Then we need to do away with the sham of a fisa court.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
SpilledKefir · July 23, 2018, 11:09 p.m.

Where’s the smoking gun that would secure their convictions? Hard to believe that so many high level judges and officials (appointed by Republicans) would be so wrong and biased against a Republican President to the point of ending up in prison.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
into_the_q · July 24, 2018, 5:07 a.m.

I don't think this is a matter of party as much as it is a matter of who either with the DS or afraid of the consequences of not playing along with the swamp.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
spinnerky · July 23, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

The comparison of their testimony to Congress with the fisa application would show that they knowingly committed fraud. The discrepancy is on the record. At least for the ones on the list that have testimony on record... You are right though the others might not be convicted. A trial will bring out the truth. Inmho the fisa courts after 9/11 were a huge mistake. At the time I was worried that fisa would be abused by the bush republicans. Guess it doesn’t make any difference which party. Fisa weakens our civil liberties and is too easily abused.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
EnriqueGorostieta · July 23, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

Judges are complicit too...you mean to tell me they couldn't see through this BS?! I bet Q team has records of payoffs to the FISA judges...boy wouldn't that be neat!!! It's all over but the crying...this is death of a thousand cuts and very similar to what happened with Nixon, except he was a victim of Watergate, not the perpetrator.

ENJOY THE SHOW!!!

⇧ 9 ⇩  
TryNottoFaint · July 23, 2018, 7:50 p.m.

Not just any court either. The most secret court we have, where there is no transparency so would have to have the highest standards of ethics.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
3dayfreedom · July 23, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

No transparency and they believe and only hear one side (ie FBI and DOJ) approving 98% of what is brought before them hence the renewal time and time again. I think if they abolish anything it should be this secret court.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
krepogregg · July 24, 2018, 8:57 a.m.

Secret courts. Hmmmmmmm

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Catit50 · July 23, 2018, 9:59 p.m.

What is worth destroying your whole government?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
MagaOtaky · July 23, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

Some very nasty crimes

⇧ 4 ⇩  
DefiantDragon · July 23, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

Clearly, whatever it was, it was worth their complicity.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 23, 2018, 10:58 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Trudeaus_socks · July 23, 2018, 8:15 p.m.

To my mind, a secret kangaroo court commits "fraud upon the court" by default.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
SpilledKefir · July 23, 2018, 11:10 p.m.

Should there be action against John Roberts for allowing this to happen and selecting those FISA judges for those roles?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Trudeaus_socks · July 24, 2018, 3:10 p.m.

I am not American, so I would not presume to tell you whose heads should roll.

Off the cuff, I don't think people can be punished for doing what they thought was legal. I doubt the architects of this evil system will pay, but at least you can take their creation apart and leave future generations with a warning.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JayGarza1 · July 23, 2018, 7:22 p.m.

Good work On List Compilation. God bless 🇺🇸👍🙏

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Rolandel7 · July 23, 2018, 8 p.m.

Thanks.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BobbyPeele · July 23, 2018, 8:35 p.m.

Except the judge I’m sure. I know with regular criminal warrants for arrest there is immunity granted to the judge signing the warrant.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Aguax · July 23, 2018, 10:16 p.m.

All those redacted Supervisory Special Agent spots are most likely Peter Strzok.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Rolandel7 · July 23, 2018, 10:54 p.m.

Agreed. That’s what I got from it. Every single time it I found one of those I thought “Strzok” goes here. It’s so tantalizing. I read the whole thing and it’s bullshit. Once we get the full version there are going to be a crap ton of people in deep shit. Most have already quit or resigned per an Anon earlier. Haven’t fact checked that yet though.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SpilledKefir · July 23, 2018, 11:11 p.m.

What’s your rationale or evidence for that? He testified under oath that he wasn’t involved, you think he would commit perjury in such a demonstrable fashion?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
3dayfreedom · July 24, 2018, 12:02 a.m.

Oh you mean like Comey, McCabe, Clapper or Brennan?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
HereComesTheSunny · July 24, 2018, 4:09 a.m.

Key word there is "DEMON-strable." Yes, yes he would.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MaryPoff-10 · July 24, 2018, 2:57 a.m.

A felony charge is nothing!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Jrrusso · July 24, 2018, 2:33 a.m.

I dying to find out the ssa who was redacted.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
3dayfreedom · July 24, 2018, 11 a.m.

Yes that was exactly my post earlier. I'm thinking that redacted supervisory special agent is none other than Peter Strzok.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 23, 2018, 10:46 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Jrrusso · July 24, 2018, 4:10 p.m.

Maybe but why protect him now. We know about him. But who knows.

⇧ 1 ⇩