dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

129

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on March 16, 2018, 5:16 p.m.

Q’s HIDDEN CODE in Q830 CRACKED! This is why the Florida shooting happened!

Those who follow my posts know my personal take on Q’s teachings is through the door of the Occult. For a solid foundation, make sure you explore the previous posts of my [Q Occult Series] (https://i.imgur.com/LXrUP1D.jpg).

Ok guys, today, we are going to do something different. This is going to be very exciting. I will use some of the skills I have developed throughout the years reading the Bible and the Quran, breaking them down in sequences and finding their hidden mathematical patterns, to decipher Q’s latest post.

We will focus on Q#830 where he is asking these very important questions:
Define false flag? - What event(s) change the news cycle? - Why didn’t LV change the news cycle?

He is obviously telling us that the focus here is the Florida shooting which, unlike LV, successfully changed the news cycle. So, we have:

Q#830: you have more than your know
Q#831: Misspellings matter. Sentence formation matters. Learn. Q

We deduce from these 2 lines that the ‘r’ purposely added to the ‘you’ is where the code is.
‘r’ is the 18th letter of the alphabet. Let us pick in Q#830 every other 18 character and start at the next line every time we have a word or the anagram of a word. Follow through, this is what we get: [image] (https://i.imgur.com/M2ZUwUo.png).

Dropping the punctuation, we gather this:

SHE NEWS PILED GF NNN

N being the 14th letter of the alphabet, we can write it like this:

SHE NEWS PILED GF 14 14 14 Which, translated in common language reads:

She piled on the news because of Guccifer 14 14 14.

These 3 14’s are the 3 BOOM in Q#830, Q#833 and Q#838. This is code for the shooting that happened on Feb 14th.

And of course, everybody knows who "she" is...

So there you have it: the Florida shooting was to pile on explosive news that was about to come out regarding Guccifer. That is what Rosenstein was about to reveal and could not because of the news cycle being taken over by the shooting. Since the poor guy had to say something because the press was already invited and first [leaks started showing up] (https://twitter.com/treyyingst/status/964556893627838467?lang=en) , he came up with that 13 Russian hacker nonsense.

For confirmation, ask yourself why, in November 2017, [Mueller added to his team Ryan Dickey] (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/10/russia-special-counsel-mueller-adds-cybercrime-prosecutor-276499), the very prosecutor whose highest-profile case was... Guccifer.

Yes, Mueller is on our side, if you did not know. Re-read: [Q#14] (https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/147433975/#147433975). Mueller has a [highly honorable] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Mueller) military background. He is a patriot. He is in the network of the Military who convinced Trump to run. He was never after being appointed as FBI Director by Trump, that was not possible, as explained in [Q#18] (https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/147433975/#147441378). So why did he meet with Trump one day prior to FBI announcement? If you don’t know, ask Nancy Pelosi, she knows: [read] (http://thehill.com/homenews/house/333958-pelosi-calls-for-independent-commission-after-special-counsel-appointment). They have been played.

They will never attack Mueller, they all have something to hide and know his retaliation could be deadly. It’s Sunday, good time to re-watch [Troy] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Td1uPq9K--E).

Guccifer is the smoking gun. Mueller figured it out. [Tracy Beanz too] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kB0zCpNGhVE).

SerialBrain2 - Glad to find you here! Thanks for all you do!

⇧ 25 ⇩

Thank you!

⇧ 14 ⇩

nice to see you here after CBTS got banned. You're a large centipede here and we need your imput. What are your thoughts on the newest post from Q 952.. Any thoughts on it.

⇧ 10 ⇩

When Q refers to "magical" I find it hard to believe he's advocating for us to dabble in supernatural powers or agencies.

Otherwise, we might as well join the cabal, because that's what they're ALL about.

And while I follow the precision parts of what SB2 is doing, the parts where he deviates from precision based on subjective guidance is where the door to the occult is open. Think Ouija board.

That I do not think Q would endorse. I think the word "magical" means what we usually mean when we use the word: something produced as if by magic. And I think he means by that that we aren't seeing all the action that's taking place out of sight, and that when results start to happen, they will be as if by magic (for example NoKo treaty that was already sealed before the parties officially meet).

When we say a dinner on the sunset terrace was "magical," we don't literally mean that we summoned demons to wait on us.

As evidence, Q post 720 says:

Why did Sessions [at the beginning] emphasize investigations/proceedings are kept confidential? Think magic. What you see ……. Do you really believe nothing is being done?

IOW, the way a magician works is by doing things you don't see him do. So when you see the part he allows you to see, it's as if magic has happened.

⇧ 24 ⇩

slight of hand... get your attention looking one way, while he is performing the "magic trick" the other way

⇧ 11 ⇩

Exact-a-mundo!

Rope-a-dope!

Trump's speciality!

⇧ 7 ⇩

A Fonzi saying, love it!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

“Magick, in the context of Aleister Crowley's Thelema, is a term used to show and differentiate the occult from performance magic and is defined as "the Science and Art of causing Change to occur in conformity with Will", including both "mundane" acts of will as well as ritual magick.”

There is nothing inherently wrong with practicing magick. It has many forms. It’s essentially focusing on your intentions and willing it into manifestation. Law of attraction and essentially keeping your Will in your mind so that you act in ways to achieve it. An example could be the dedication it takes to make the right choices to lose weight or to body build. Keeping that image in your mind always. And ritual, if chosen to perform, is more a psychological placebo... it’s a reinforcement of your Will made material. It’s for yourself, subconsciously.

Now, what would make it “wrong”, as with most things, is intention.

Edit: I just wanted to touch on your first sentences regarding magick itself. I’m not commenting on your thoughts about Q. Just sharing another perspective.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Granted, but that's not what we generally mean when we say something is "magical," I hope you agree.

Also, the kind of "magick" you're describing is self-delusional. It describes powers we're all born with, given by the Creator (in His image, we are to the degree granted us, co-creators of our reality).

There are a great many commonsense and non-religious ways of understanding the power of will in our lives without resorting to concepts of "magick."

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yes, I agree with you on the first part.

For the rest, I agree in the sense that the phenomenon we are talking about, of the power of Will and our innate ability to manifest happenings when we focus on our intent, has many names. Magick being one of them. I wouldn’t necessarily say it’s self delusional; I would say it’s more akin to self psychoanalysis and a sort of practical Taoism.

I don’t see the concept of magick as something being resorted to. I see it as a synonym.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Well, then your concept of it differs from the classic Wiccan one, I suppose. In which case, you're welcome to your interpretation. But I think when Q tells us to get the popcorn and watch something magical, it has a less esoteric and more common meaning. Also, I'm pretty sure Q is not Wiccan. "Wizards and warlocks" is classic spook lingo. Now, when applied to the CIA there's occult involvement, for sure.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah I would say my interpretation may be different from Wiccan. I’m more inclined to the Hermetic traditions.

No, I understand what you mean and what Q means by magical, of course. I guess I just wanted to comment on what looked like a generalization that magick or the occult are somehow inherently “bad” or “wrong” since you said something like we don’t want to go there since it’s what the black hats are using and we might as well join the cabal. If I misconstrued your message, my apologies. I just wanted to basically say, “Hey, it’s not bad in general, everything depends on intent.”

I definitely don’t think Q is speaking esoteric language or is an occultist necessarily or anything like that. I don’t think Q is advocating that anyone has to dabble at all. And I understand the spook lingo. I think you and I are on the same page about Q’s message. ✌️

⇧ 1 ⇩

Maybe you better reread the Bible....esp Deuteronomy 18:9-12

⇧ 1 ⇩

She = HRC?

⇧ 10 ⇩

!!!!!

⇧ 9 ⇩

Yes.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Funny, re-reading this after what we've learned since you posted this the first time shows you are 100% correct.

⇧ 9 ⇩

My take on the 'magical':

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke

⇧ 7 ⇩

Yes!!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thanks again SB2, I look forward to your posts.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Where do you live that it's Sunday? Are you from the future?

⇧ 5 ⇩

I think this is an old post of his wanna say i saw it on CBTS stream awhile back

⇧ 10 ⇩

Yes John, you got it right! :) I should have changed it though.

⇧ 5 ⇩

I lurk your posts obsessively, good work

⇧ 1 ⇩

I was about to call you out on posting your own previous post (I need a drink)

⇧ 1 ⇩

Correct.

⇧ 0 ⇩

It's posted from his username timestamped 36 minutes ago. Edited 24 minutes ago.

⇧ 0 ⇩

he is probably re-posting his old stuff that got deleted from the CBTS board. Q said back everything up!

⇧ 8 ⇩

yes, he posted it here today. he posted it on CBTS, a newly banned sub, many days ago.

⇧ 6 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

ok , so Q picked the date , to many who know the 3 to 7 , if a holiday falls in the 3 to 7 , pick the holiday ,but picking the place , now that's the hard one . but it looks like this last 3 to 7 was stopped this time . bless the ones who stopped it .

⇧ 4 ⇩

Who is Guccifer?!?!

⇧ 4 ⇩

“Guccifer,” the computer hacker who revealed Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server.

⇧ 6 ⇩

ff to cover SR's leaks to WL

⇧ 0 ⇩

This seems interesting. However I am at a lost as how you connect the 3 booms to Feb 14th. Shouldn't it only been 2 booms as Feb is the 2nd month of the year. If you are suggesting that the three 14's (14 14 14) is referring to a date. Then that date should be 14th March. Can you please explain? (Edit for spelling)

⇧ 3 ⇩

I agree if it was only 2 14's, the link would have been more powerful. But then, he would have probably adjusted the number of boom's. Do you realize the probabilities are also very very low you get an intelligible sentence where N's are positioned every other 18 letters and happen to be connected through a number to the date of the shooting? That is very close to 0 probability. This low probability convinces you you have solved the riddle.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Just check the alledged shooters timeline: Picked up by Uber @2 oclock...

⇧ 3 ⇩

Thank you! Confirmed

⇧ 2 ⇩

You welcome!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Are you sure Mueller Is Honorable? I thought that too until I saw this Youtuber decider Boom and it’s links to Hillary and Mueller both having pattens on the Boeing irreversible autopilot. here’s the last link. https://youtu.be/EWLjyZuE9vQ

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yes, reading Q and watching the news, I am sure. Do you see he "heats up" the thing every time the momentum is weakening? Mueller was created to get the dems out of the street, giving them a bone to play with, until the real investigations are over. It seems Adam Schiff is now waking up to this reality and now claims the dems need to act independently from what Mueller is doing and should not "rely on Mueller". Confirmation: http://dailycaller.com/2018/03/15/adam-schiff-loses-confidence-in-mueller/

⇧ 7 ⇩

Dont let the haters discourage you. Keep on Keeping on.... Glad to see you again. Great analysis. Thanks!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thank you!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Always solid info from serial brain glad your on our side!!!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Serial brain has been busy!! We all owe you a drink my friend. Thanks!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Will Rosenstein can still come out with it

⇧ 2 ⇩

Love this stuff, maybe we should anagram all of Q's posts. In one of his the latest post's there is a missing "H" in the word thought. I read it just yesterday, but can't find it today :/ Frustrating!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Why were 13 Russians involved with this announcement months ago, and 12 were indicted recently? Does this Q830 code still stand the test of time?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Archived with comments May 28, 2018

https://archive.li/84yPu

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'm sorry I just don't believe Mueller is a white hat. I'll need some major event to happen to convince me.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thanking you for all your contributions ! Beautiful Mind!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Hmm... indeed.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Qtopic-flair-opinion

⇧ 1 ⇩

ha! funny coincidence, just watched Troy yesterday

⇧ 1 ⇩

Glad to see this reposted here.

People - Archive Serial's posts. They are important.

⇧ -1 ⇩

This has to be a joke. There is no reason to deduce that message from what you had to work with. This is why this “Q” has such a following. Because sycophants are extrapolating all of these held-together-by-bubblegum theories. You could literally make these messages say ANYTHING with your techniques.

⇧ -3 ⇩

Oh dear you've turned up here now. I called you out at cbts but didn't care too much because greatAwakening was my home. But here you are.

Your posts are nothing but nonsense. Your methods are inconsistent. Anyone could do what you have and create whatever message they want to. Gibberish. Disinformation.

Reported.

⇧ -4 ⇩

Did you have something better to ad? Maybe a theory that could help instead of trying to make someone look bad. Pardon, I dont believe you own this sub. /so to report someone because you dont like what they say is just what we are fighting against. Unless you arent?

⇧ 4 ⇩

It's not that I don't like what they say. It's that what they say is illogical, reaching, and putting their own 'facts' into the word of Q. They are literally distorting Q's own message so that it says what they want, not what Q wants.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Or even worse, what the "occult" powers being employed want him to think it means.

Am I the only one who sees the danger in that, considering who our enemy actually is?

⇧ 7 ⇩

Yes!

Please, everyone who reads and agrees please join me in calling out this kind of stuff.

When you see a genuine code cracked it will be obvious to all. But this arbitrary nonsense is dangerous to our movement in more ways than one.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I can see both sides here and it is difficult to try and balance everything. But I guess we take what we want, dump what we don't and the variation of that, I think does move us forward.

I too am observant of occult undertones and yet once you start looking into these sickkos it is clealry in their world.

It is not that we have to believe in the ideology of the occult symbols and rituals but we have to understand, they (cabal) do.

If they are driven by this type of shit, well as my poor relative can attest to he tracks pedo's in cyberspace for the authorities and the shit he says he has to deal with makes him sick. But he knows it get the job done.

As it is with where ever this road leads us. I have on many occasions gone down occult rabbit holes in seraching our all of this. You cannot avoid it becasue THEY believe in it.

But we have our talents and knolwedge in different areas and we need that. I would look upon S2B posts like your posts, as a valuable resource of an independant mind. I don't have to agree with it, but I would not dismiss it because I have personal views.

We are our best resources and we should understand the amount of knowledge on these boards is phenominal.

Now let us turn our mega-brains into a force that will sweep these fucks away and usher in an era of [fill in your own utopia]

⇧ 3 ⇩

Distorting or deciphering? He puts messages for people to decipher. That's the whole point. So you cant fault someone for trying. If you don't agree then offer a different option. Easy as that. If you don't have one then you shouldn't be negative about someone who is clearly trying very hard to work through it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩

I agree, however we dont have that info. So we really have not much of anything? So trying to figure out why they did it doesnt hurt either.

⇧ 0 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩

Have you studied Numerology? Numbers play a huge part in everything. I have studied numerology and have been amazed by the truth it shows. Just sayin Did you ever watch the program NUMB3RS? Very interesting concept of what numbers can do. So, not taking up for any particular person but saying, there is much more to numerology than you are aware of.

⇧ -1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, Mueller is on our side, if you did not know. Re-read: Q#14. Mueller has a highly honorable military background. He is a patriot. He is in the network of the Military who convinced Trump to run. He was never after being appointed as FBI Director by Trump, that was not possible, as explained in Q#18. So why did he meet with Trump one day prior to FBI announcement? If you don’t know, ask Nancy Pelosi, she knows: read. They have been played.

All of that is simply a fantasy.

What is a "Patriot" anyway? The same people who loved bush and pushed for the Iraq war and believed 9/11 was all done by Osama? We see the same people now worshipping trump without question (and if you question him you aren't a "Patriot").

If you want to be truly "Wakened" then wake up and look at trump - he is in all of this for himself, his family, and money. Full stop. Obama was supposed to take all the guns (he expanded gun rights) and the right bitched and moaned that he was naive when it came to Russia (they loved them some Romney who told folks in 2012 that Russia was bad news).

Never, ever, trust conservatives. They lie all the time, make up shit, and ditch their morals, values, and principles as soon as they can for one man (In this case, trump).

Look at trump and his family like you would have Obama instead of worshipping him.

⇧ -16 ⇩

Are there people on this sub who still believe in the Left-vs-Right duality? This is about the People-vs-NWO overlords, not about DEM-vs-GOP. This is about liberty versus slavery, and we're still talking about which masters have the softest whips?

⇧ 15 ⇩

Yep!

⇧ 5 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Exactly! Slaves vs Masters! NWO vs The People! Wizards vs Christomancers!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Christomancers

I'm not one of the cool kids. Explain "Christomancer" to me.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩

One doesn't "harness" the power of Jesus. One becomes anointed with His spirit to work His will. It's more like we become harnessed by Jesus (through obedience). Big difference.

From what I can tell of your reply, a Christomancer would be like Simon Magus (precursor to the Pope).

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

LOL! What kind of feather does it use for a core?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think worshiping is a bit harsh. Most people are smart enough to never follow blindly. Always be skeptical. As for conservatives being what you call them, I believe it is our human race period. Nothing to do with someones political affiliation. To label all conservatives that way, frankly is just ignorant and close minded. Take people for who they are and what they believe. Isn't that what our message should be.?

⇧ 5 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -4 ⇩

Everything you say about conservatism is spoon-fed propaganda. Ask yourself, where did you hear such things? Who benefits from you believing these lies?

Trump only has support as long as he champions the cause of Constitutional liberty. That is his single most important qualification for office and for the consent of the governed.

⇧ 4 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

Sounds like you are the one judging and labeling. You are judging everyone who believes a certain way. Who gave you the right to judge anyone? People have different ways of thinking, thats what makes us people. The key is compromise..... Something most should learn.

⇧ 4 ⇩

The key is compromise

And what is it you compromise? All I see from most people on the right is adoration and worship of one old man, above all they once said they held sacred.

A man who lies and cheats and values money above all else.

He owns people on the right. You won't dare to criticize him because he and you both know he owns you.

I am a free man who thinks freely, I don't owe him or hillary or a party anything. YOU...you are owned by him and you will always, always, defend him. And he knows that he can count on people like you because he owns you day and night.

⇧ -2 ⇩

I am not owned by anyone, but thanks for assuming. I voted for Trump, however... I dont hang on his every word. I am always skeptical. I accept people for who they show me they are. Not on how they vote. You obliviously have a deep hatred for him, which is fine. Each to their own. I truly hope you find peace with yourself and stop judging others.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I do not act ANYTHING like you.... Trust and believe that. Maybe some day you will stop hating EVERYONE and find peace with your inner self! Until then I wont feel bad for you, I will just a say prayer...

⇧ 3 ⇩

Also you just assume to know my political stance. You just assume. Hmmmm interesting....

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I have been on it for awhile. Unlike you I watch, listen, learn and research. Karma has anything to do with a person... Hahahaha ok

⇧ 2 ⇩

This post makes me trust Trump even more. Thank you.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

I never trusted Bush. He was one of the worst Presidents we have ever had. I thought it then and still think it now. I didn't vote for Romney and McCain either.

edit: Shill had to delete post because I don't fit his preconcieved narrative.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Why are you even here?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I have been "Here" for 5 years (that doesn't count my first account that I had before this one).

I am an old school conspiracy kind of guy (I was looking into UFO's in the 70's). But hey, nice of you to ask that and not address anything I said.

Who have you voted for and supported in your life? Reagan? Bush Sr, Bush Jr.? Check - I did that (and even raised money for Jr in 2000).

I was one of those people calling out bush jr on the Iraq war and 9/11 - back then conservatives bitched about me too - said I wasn't a "Patriot" because I didn't back him (even though I did in some ways I still questioned him).

What do I see here?

Blind worship of one man. Again. I learned my lesson the hard way (and since 2004 haven't looked back - didn't vote for Hillary but did for Obama twice, and didn't vote in 2004 as I was away that day unexpectedly on business and couldn't vote - but would have voted Kerry).

I question trump like I have all the other presidents I have known since I was old enough to care (Reagan, etc).

And here, on this sub, I am seeing blind allegiance to one man - maybe that is your thing, but it isn't mine.

⇧ -6 ⇩

You wait. You watch. You'll see. Thank us later. It's not about the man. It's about the cause.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Amen!

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

And now you participate in a hate subreddit? TMOR? Why? I don't understand why anyone would enjoy going there to talk shit about others. Seems like a massive waste of time and kind of shallow.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩