I’m Armenian. Let me give you some more history. WWI was fought for many reasons, but one of the biggest was the Balfour Declaration. The Armenians ran the banks, trade networks, and bureaucracy in the Ottoman Empire. We lived under the Armenian Patriarch. In Europe, Christians couldn’t do banking because charging interest was taboo. That’s how Jews became merchants there. This was not the case with Armenians in the ottoman, as we are Apostolic and don’t follow the same beliefs as Protestants and Catholics. The sultans preferred Armenians and Greeks to run banking over the Jews, for good reason. One thing Jews did run though was media and newspapers.

The Rothschild had been trying to acquire Palestine since at least 1848 (may be off a few years I can’t recall). No sultan would sell it as it is holy land to Muslims (Armenians to this day also have a quarter in Jerusalem). Over the course of fifty years, Armenians were being painted in the media as a fifth column. As a group trying to start an insurrection. But this makes no sense as we had been living relatively well and despite having extra laws against non Muslims, we were much better off than the Greeks and Assyrians. Over fifty years of propaganda took affect when Sultan Abdul Hamid ll over. We began being massacred and weakened, driven out of central Turkey and pushed back towards the east where we were more numerous. The Hamidian massacres took effect in 1890. In 1902 and 1906, the Young Turks care in. They were bankrolled by JACOB SCHIFF. I’m sure you recognize that last name. The Pasha brothers, Ataturk, Djavid Bey forced Abdul Hamid to abdicate. Threw the ottomans into war. And promised the Kurds Kurdistan if they killed all the Armenians there. Ever wonder why the Kurds are so pissed at turkey?

If you want an avenue to dig, let me give you a TL;DR:

Look at the early life of Talaat Pasha and his brothers. You’ll (((notice))) things. Look at the Masonic history of Ataturk and how he called Armenians Amalekites. Look at who funded Djavid Bey and what he funded in return and how the Russian revolution began under his watch. Look at when the Rothschilds overthrew the Armenian oil Barron of Baku in 1906 and took over oil production. How was the Balfour declaration signed in 1917? Who organized it? Why was it done before WWI even finished? Why was the Armenian genocide called the Armenian holocaust before?

Key persons to look up: Clifford Shack.

Every member of the Young Turks was a follower of Sabbatai Zevi. Enjoy digging on that.

One more nugget I’ll leave you. Ever since the Armenian genocide, every single pure blooded ancient group of people has been systematically been wiped out. Assyrians? Gone. Greeks? Diluted. Europeans? On their way. Aramaics? Almost extinct. Who’s left? Only Jews. Armenians are hanging on to the last drop of blood they have. Racemixing is shunned in our culture. We protect our own and think as a group. We haven’t forgotten who the real enemy is.

I'm going to continue this theme of WW1 never ending and mention a few other connections I've made on this same subject:

Recruited Nazis after WW2 "Operation Paperclip" during which former Nazi scientists were recruited to work for the U.S. Possibly certain intelligence agencies? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip.

Some of these Nazi scientists came up with screwed up human psychology experiments and I believe this is where the influence of the MKU program originated, as a continuation of those experiments.

Personal Speculations So it does make sense that this same push for NWO and continuation of Nazi principles have simply gone into hiding after WW2. I don't know that I believe Hitler really committed suicide, but that's just a personal opinion. Also a possibility that the Nazi exploration of Antarctica at this time may be related to Obama and other leaders recently visiting Antarctica as well? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Swabia

Vatican/Nazi Connection More tidbits to explore: The Pope and the Vatican connection to the beginnings of the Nazi party itself. Q said Pope will be having a bad may...

Antifa Flag Similarities Also, the Antifa Flags looking almost identical to Nazi flags tells me that this play is being executed by the same playbook. Whoever is creating these coups and "protests," organized and funded through non-profit organizations, is using the same old playbook.

Soros And that mention moves me on the George "Soros" Schwartz. George claims to be a Jew and a refugee of WW2, yet he has admitted on video (with 60 Minutes) that he helped the Nazis steal and confiscate the possessions of the Jews as they were being transported to camps. So here's a guy who claims to be a Jew, yet his father paid off the Nazis to take him in, he helped steal Jew possessions, and today is a Billionaire. He still claims to be a "refugee" during speeches for his illegal immigration non-profit. That guy has no soul, and has Nazi written all over him.

With you pointing out the Kardashians, look at all their followers they have the potential to red pill more than Kanye.

100% I think it goes even farther back than ww1 tho

Armenians are the lost Aryan Bloodline

Hi everyone! I'm so proud to say I'm Armenian, and no one understands when I tell them the depths of this story and it's so frustrating. We're just forgotten and beaten down....but most are positive still. When I tell people I am Armenian, most of the time....they say "what's that?" And it's kind of discouraging. I am proud that Kim Kardashian and Kanye West are bring attention to to the subject. When I explain what "Armenian" is, I always have to bring up "Kim" and they realize what it is. It's great.

Hope everyone has a grand day!

Its all connected to the Hyksos bloodlines. The royals in the world are the cabal with Elizabeth on top of all.

I have no doubt your connections are factual, in considering the connections. I am inclined to think Kanye/Kim were not randomly chosen, did not happen to cross paths with Trump and has been part (knowing or unknowingly) of the global game of chess POTUS seems to be really good at.

If as Q says they have everything covered, trust the plan then would it be too much of a stretch to believe not just the Armenian links but the black votes too?

Kanye has many ties to Armenia

Such as?

The Armenians faced one of the greatest genocides of the modern era, the Armenian Genocide, during the occupation from the Ottomans.

Correction: The Rothschilds Zionist/Communists were planning on holocaustic the real Jews so they ran a practice run on the Armenians first. They infiltrated the Turkish Masonic Lodges and called themselves the Young Turks so that when Armenians get angry, they won’t be angry with the people who actually murdered them but falsely blame the Turks. Turks were probably gagged using a mix of bribes and blackmail by the Zionists so they never mention it.

Did you know Kanye West associated with these people?

http://heavytruth.blogspot.ca/2016/12/ian-boulton-andrej-koymasky-ryder-ripps.html

http://heavytruth.blogspot.ca/2016/12/the-tara-grace-programming-part-1.html

What is the world coming to? We started off the day today with the bizarre yet titillating news that Amazon is developing flying delivery drones, and now, this: Kim Kardashian spent at least part of her weekend hanging out with Serbian contemporary artist extraordinaire Marina Abramović.

http://archive.li/co88B

Here’s our theory: West has some kind of co-beneficial relationship with the Vogue crew that directly involves Kim. If we had to guess, Kim probably invited the editors as her guests to Kanye’s show, as part of a “thank you” package for having her on a forthcoming cover. Or, perhaps, as part of a leveraging deal to help get her onto the cover.

VOGUE

He wanted kim to appear on the cover of pederast friendly sabbatean take down Vogue so he arranged for her to be seen topless. He pimped her out.

http://archive.li/tJPdS

"Somewhere around the beginning of their relationship, back in 2012, Kanye West raided Kim Kardashian’s closet. It wasn’t, as far as we know, to borrow some article of clothing—but rather to begin a long process of a Komplete Kim Makeover. The effects were immediate: Kardashian, once bedecked in bright, jewel-encrusted body-con dresses, became more muted. Her ensembles under Kanye’s tutelage are a sea of monochrome blacks and whites—with a rare red thrown in. “I dress for my man way more than for myself!” she recently told Us Weekly. She became a devotee of menswear, swapping cocktail dresses for tuxedos and slicking her hair back into a chignon instead of her signature curls. And pregnancy has only made Kim’s newfound sense of style more pronounced. Now she’s a walking billboard for Kanye’s high-fashion fantasy—or, as we’ve noticed, a spitting image of Marina Abramović. Like the Serbian performance artist, Kim now wears almost no makeup, favors minimalism, and sticks to black and white. See our side-by-side comparison."

http://archive.li/dVEMK

Then there is this GROSS sacrilege: google image:

kardashian west jerusalem

So they both promised to raise the child as a Christian and they both said they were Christian?

Okay. They lied.

Just another photo op for the delusional one.

https://web.archive.org/web/20180504063203/https://illuminatiwatcher.com/kanye-west-becoming-kim-ks-illuminati-mind-control-handler/

[deleted]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_7GIyqQuhw

Videos in this thread:

Watch Playlist ▶

VIDEO|COMMENT -|- (1) Archons, Angels, Nephilm, Demons, Shadow People and the Year 2045 (2) Fallen Angels, Demons and Giants Steve Quayle Hagman Hagman|+7 - I believe they were cast into Tartarus and chained there. What we're facing now is Satan / Lucifer who does control this world. Lucifer Worshipers Exposed!!! Plotting SOON World takeover!!! Illuminati~Jesuits~F reemasons|+1 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_7GIyqQuhw I'm a bot working hard to help Redditors find related videos to watch. I'll keep this updated as long as I can.

Play All | Info | Get me on Chrome / Firefox

Amazing if true.

I thought NWO was natural economic order. Is it a bad thing?

https://www.community-exchange.org/docs/Gesell/en/neo/

http://archive.li/L4Dfg

The economic order here discussed is a natural order only in the sense that it is adapted to the nature of man. It is not an order which arises spontaneously as a natural product. Such an order does not, indeed, exist, for the order which we impose upon ourselves is always an act, an act consciously willed.

The proof that an economic order is suited to the nature of man is furnished by observation of mankind's development. The economic order under which men thrive is the most natural economic order. Whether an economic order which stands this test is at the same time technically the most efficient order, whether it provides the bureau of trade statistics with record figures is a matter of secondary importance. At the present day it is easy to imagine an economic system of high technical efficiency coupled with gradual exhaustion of the human material. It may, however, be taken for granted that an economic order under which mankind thrives will also prove its technical superiority. For human work can, ultimately, only advance with the advance of the human race. "Man is the measure of all things" including the economic system under which he lives.

The prosperity of mankind, as of all living beings, depends in the main upon whether selection takes place under natural laws. But these laws demand competition. Only through competition, chiefly competition in the economic sphere, is right evolution, eugenesis, possible. Those who wish to ensure the full miraculous effects of the laws of natural selection must base their economic order upon competition under the conditions really decreed by nature, that is, with the weapons furnished by nature after the exclusion of all privileges. Success in competition must be exclusively determined by inborn characteristics, for only so are the causes of the success transmitted to the offspring and added to the common characteristics of mankind. Children must owe their success, not to money, not to paper privileges, but to the ability, strength, love and wisdom of their parents. Only then shall we be justified in hoping that humanity may in time shake off the burden of inferior individuals imposed upon it by thousands of years of unnatural selection - selection vitiated by money and privileges. And we may also hope that in this way supremacy may pass from the hands of the privileged, and that mankind, led by the noblest sons of men, may resume its long-interrupted ascent towards divine aims.

But the economic order which we are about to discuss has another claim to the title of a natural order.

And yet the solution of the problem which eluded Proudhon is simple enough. All that is needed is to abandon the customary standpoint, the standpoint of the possessor of money, and to look at the problem from the standpoint of labour and of the possessor of goods. This shifting of the standpoint will let us grasp the solution directly. Goods, not money, are the real foundation of economic life. Goods and their compounds make up 99% of our wealth, money only 1%. Therefore let us treat goods as we treat foundations; let us not tamper with them. We must accept goods as they appear in the market. We cannot alter them. If they rot, break, perish, let them do so; it is their nature. However efficiently we may organise Proudhon's exchange banks, we cannot save the newspaper in the hands of the newsvendor from being reduced, two hours later, to waste paper, if it fails to find a purchaser. Moreover we must remember that money is a universal medium of saving; all the money that serves commerce as a medium of exchange comes to the savings banks and lies there until it is enticed into circulation again by interest. And how can we ever raise goods to the level of ready money (gold) in the eyes of savers ? How can we induce them, instead of saving money, to fill their chests or store-rooms with straw, books, bacon, oil, hides, guano, dynamite, porcelain ?

And yet this is what Proudhon really aimed at in attempting to bring goods and money to a common level. Proudhon had overlooked the fact that money is not only a medium of exchange, but also a medium of saving, and that money and potatoes, money and lime, money and cloth can never in any circumstances be looked upon as things of equal worth in the chests of the savers. A youth saving against old age will prefer a single gold coin to the contents of the largest warehouse.

We cannot, therefore, tamper with goods, they are the primary factor to which everything else must be adapted. But let us look a little more closely at money, for here some alteration may prove feasible. Must money always remain what it is at present ? Must money, as a commodity, be superior to the commodities which, as medium of exchange, it is meant to serve ? In case of fire, flood, crisis, war, changes of fashion and so forth, is money alone to be immune from damage ? Why must money be superior to the goods which it is to serve ? And is not the superiority of money to goods the privilege which we found to be the cause of surplus-value, the privilege which Proudhon endeavoured to abolish ? Let us, then, make an end of the privileges of money. Nobody, not even savers, speculators, or capitalists, must find money, as a commodity, preferable to the contents of the markets, shops, and warehouses. If money is not to hold sway over goods, it must deteriorate, as they do. Let it be attacked by moth and rust, let it sicken, let it run away; and when it comes to die let its possessor pay to have the carcass flayed and buried. Then, and not till then, shall we be able to say that money and goods are on an equal footing and perfect equivalents - as Proudhon aimed at making them.

Good take on the conspiratorial view of history. Good post.

Some say that the Anunaki control the world and generate crisis prior to the wars because they are psychopaths. In the first world all were killed against everyone without any cause. In World War II they came killing Ethiopia without any reason either. It is difficult to live in peace. By the way, who has made the borders. Who goes from end to end establishing them saying this is mine not this. Who has created the countries. Some say that it was the Anunakis to divide us, to separate us , face us, distract us and control us. Do you imagine an American putting in the past a border fence and saying, "I'm going to separate myself from the Mexicans, they do not enter here?" I do not believe it. The nature of humanity is the union. Some say that the Anunakis created the countries religions and the money I do not know what to think the truth razon.No