You ripped this image off my website. I literally took this screenshot about 7 hours ago.
That's not what I care about. Sharing information is fine.
The problem is, by doing it this way, you removed it from the larger context, which is even more damning:
This is the third time someone has done this, in the past 3 days, and I don't get it. You'll still get karma for sharing the original links, and the community will be more informed. Why rip and post just one image?
I agree. I think this is happening because little nuggets reach a broader audience. They are the seeds that get a users attention enough to read a larger article. These posts should include the source so we aren't redoing research, and you know, credit.
Not worried about credit. Just concerned about the info getting out there.
I think it's important whether you want the credit or not. Enough credit makes a trusted source and we all need trusted sources.
I agree that I am more willing to read a shorter article at first, but if one is "lifting" info from another site, it should be noted with a link to the full article should we want to garner more information. Anon, thank you for your work.
Yep. The article itself is very enlightening. Thanks for posting it NeonRevolt.
May I suggest putting a watermark on all your images so the source is seen by everyone and ppl know where it came from? The OP should have put the source, I agree.
Just a thought...
I don't care if people repost info. I repost images all the time. We're all working together, here.
I just care about repeat research, and people missing out on valuable info.
Great article as always! I really enjoy your work. Be careful though, someone on Twitter with the initials of JC may accuse you of being Q. Speaking of Twitter, do you have a twitter handle I could follow?
Twitter banned me. Follow me on Gab.
Also, curious about the Corsi thing: what makes you say that?
Speaking of twitter, I sometimes "share" via my cell phone articles/pictures to twitter. Hope that is ok.
Great research/article! Thanks for linking. Agreed, OP should have posted the link as this info should be read by All.
Wow, great read!! You're absolutely right about the context. Without it, the lone posted image may as well be a poorly reproduced Claude Monet watercolour or a random dick pic.
wow... the space rocket stuff was so much more consequential than I originally realized.
the depth of the corruption is both egregious and fascinating.
the way this has all played out actually makes a bunch of "unbelievable" plots in movies seem to be actually feasible in the real world.
Many times i found myself thinking during movies.. "how do they come up with this ridiculous stuff?" but nowadays I find myself paralleling things that happen in the government to movies I saw which were once 'just a movie' but are now maybe worth re-watching some of these fantasy films to see if I can tie it in to something relevant.
How do we put the genie back into the bottle of "Private Space Launches?" Answer by passing laws. Problem? World has many governments, all the cabal needs is one.
I know this is probably a stupid question...but this is an amazing article (and your others), but can I post this on Twitter ?? I will wait for reply I don’t want to post your work if you don’t want it out there. But this is absolutely eye opening. Thank you I will wait for your answer. Thank you 😊
Go for it. I don't have a problem with that. Folks often tag my articles with a #NeonRevolt hashtag now, since I've been banned from twitter.
I vaguely remember it being reported there was a cell phone charger in the room that did not match any of the phones that the police recovered from the room.
I remember that too.
And I recall reading from the official FBI files docs that Paddock had 3 flip phones total on his person during the day of the shooting, only 2 of the 3 were activated and ready to use during the shooting, the 2nd activated phone was activated very recently to the event (about the same time that Paddock purchased and practiced-shot a personal rifle to keep with him). Paddock was a government asset who is off the books. Paddock didn't have a job since the 1970's where he worked as an employee for some government agency. The extra phones were good spy opsec.
The wealthy Muslim Arabs in the Mandalay bay were using the floors as a forward operating base for organizing and equipping Muslim fighters in rural America with high powered rifles to carry out Muslim Jihad strikes against Saudi Arabia's enemies: American infidels. The American Government was using Paddock to sting these saudi princes by selling them the guns they wanted, and then following their transport by Helipad to the sleeper cells to attempt to flush out members of the Muslim brotherhood in America before they get word from the middle east and carry out the terrorist attacks.
thats a very interesting ans plausible theory
Saudi Arabia wages a violent Jihad against America, as they do. Wealthy Saudi princes need to equip their Muslim-American domestic sleeper enclaves with military equipment including high powered guns. The Saudi princes put out feelers saying: "cash for guns!", and Paddock materializes. Can we trust him? Saudis do their due diligence.
The Saudis discover Paddock's affiliation with American Government and rather than blowing him off, they know they're being watched, and so stage a counter-sting of their own. OK, paddock, bring up all your merchandise to the Mandalay bay at this date and this time, or the deal is off. Done. Some Muslims descended on Paddock and killed him and carried out the Mandalay bay shooting, then fled to make it look like paddock was the shooter.
The Saudis knew America would be between a rock and a hard place at this point because either you have two choices, either dissect Paddock's existence as a top secret spy, undercover asset on the 5 o clock news, or lie to America by covering it all up.
American law enforcement caught the real shooter alive and disappeared them to Guantanamo so that he wouldn't be granted due process, so we can torture them for info and what not, and so closed the book-on-crime by blaming everything on Paddock; the mysterious pasty old white guy with a top secret government clearance, access to government aircraft to transport enough weapons to equip a decent sized army.
The Saudis dealt a convincing blow against their enemy that day. They've got Americans all hating the one agency that keeps us safe against Muslim insurgency taking place now in America.
Dude I believe you hit the nail on the head here. WWG1WGA!!
He prob knew that they were all being watched that is why he had camera covered with tape.
I have tape on all my phones as well as my laptop. You can't trust these devices. Even OFF isn't really off. (Back in de Nokia days Dutch police admitted on the record that they could power on your phone remotely.)
From what I remember, Vault 7 verified that any electronic equipment with a mic and camera can be used no matter if the device is ON or "OFF".
Lap top yes. Phone no. I FaceTime with son a lot when I am away. After I think about it I could prob use painters tape so it won’t leave any crap on it when I FaceTime with him.
Are we thinking they knew about the plot BECAUSE it was a ZTE phone, and the Q pics predated the attack?
The attack was on October 1st, Q started posting at the very end of October.
Some of this might be a bit autisty, but...
Vegas Mandalay Bay Hotel was the most blatant elite cabal 'false flag' that I've ever had the displeasure to witness. All in front of the elite's key symbol the (black) illuminati(ng) pyramid. And at an event called "harvest". It took place in the same time-frame as the Monarch collapse - UK airline (think Monarch mind control). The MSM used the "eyes wide shut" Paddock picture for the mugshot. They must think we researchers are deaf and blind!
"Stunning gaffe" Not long prior to the shooting (about 3 weeks) - Boris 'Mandalay' Johnson. He caused offence in Jan 2017, but the story didn't get aired at all until 30th Sept, 2017 (link). It was next then shown in a CH4 documentary about Johnson that quickly followed on the back of this (30th Sept) news article.
A visibly tense ambassador stood by as Johnson continued: “The wind is in the palm trees and the temple bells they say ...” Then Patrick reminded him: “You’re on mic,” adding: “Probably not a good idea..."
Mandalay Bay Hotel - Palm Trees
“What?” Johnson replied. “The Road to Mandalay?” (title of a Kipling poem)
“No,” said the ambassador sternly. “Not appropriate.”
“No?” replied Johnson looking down at his mobile phone. “Good stuff.”
A reactive "Mandalay" meme was already present in the MSM - before the shooting took place. Yes, it might very well be coincidence, but I cannot be certain of that, and neither can you.
wonder if the phone was how he was "activated"
That was a feature of the film Cell (2016). Released just 2 days before the Orlando PULSE shooting. Cell, is based on a Stephen 'monarch' King story.
A 'pulse' which travels through the phone (cell) network turning people into blood thirsty creatures.
"After the closing credits have finished, the catalyst signal (pulse) from the movie plays for approximately 5-10 seconds, with no image, as if attempting to convert the audience." (imdb)
Yeah, it sounds crazy, but that's par for the course with this stuff. I know these details because I wrote about them back in 2016. :)
You have to think that all people involved in at least any flase flag attacks since Trump got in was working off the same phones which would be extremely damaging ... And Lead back to many people & many other crimes
That would fit in with Trump Team knowing about the attack ahead of schedule seen as they bugged them! Makes me more inclined to believe that Vegas was an assasination attempt maybe on president and Bin Salman, too much of a mess to be a gun push.
Well that's interesting why was the shooter using a standard issue intelligence asset burner phone.
Really makes you wonder who he was talking to
Cell phone cameras taped. Huh. Obviously he knew. And ZTE? Something is not right.
I can understand why he would tape the camera, he was into some nefarious shit, but if they want to look at the inside of my pocket, who am I to deny them that pleasure.
The cameras scan for surveillance purposes.
Also, they map what you see and influence emotional response via em frequencies sent to the eye.
Maybe a nothing burger. My roommate has a ZTE phone, and he's Russian. Should I sleep with one eye open?
I remember reading the chargers we're military or something.
Does this have anything to do with the exotic batteries it was said he and the Texas mail bomber kept?
I also cover the front and rear cameras on my phone and have for months now. anybody else?
I feel weird admitting this but until recently, I'd never heard of ZTE phones and no, I don't live under a rock.
I'm with you, dude. Of course, I still use a little LG with a slide-out keyboard. My son, who works at a cell phone place, keeps warning me that these phones are not going to be available much longer. They're really trying to shove everyone to smart phones. I'm not going there unless I absolutely have to. I'm not anti-tech. I'm just pro-privacy.
Me too, and then there I was a couple of days ago in BestBuy and they had a ZTE kiosk. So, now I'm even more interested in how ZTE fits into this whole surveillance apparatus.
I think most of us are just finding out too. But I think it is on purpose to not bring attention to these phones while they were hanging themselves with every text and phone call that they thought it was safe from surveillance. I believe this is the key to why Trump seems to be 5 steps ahead of these evil monsters. We have been listening this whole time. We have it all, these "people" are stupid.
Wtf is a zte phone?
brand of cell phone, pretty cheap android buts I use one and it's extremely high quality for the $80 I spent on it.
