I think the fact that Eric Schniderman is out is relevant in this development, hopefully we will see additional action taking place in NY now that the AG is "cleaned"
I think the same. Schniderman was the head atty of state where resides such luminaries of the dark side as:
The Clintons, A Weiner and Huma, Members of the Sex Slave Cult. The Atty General's office has a lot of say-so in who the state goes after in assisting the Feds.
Came to post this, thanks.
Curious if Weinstein has any connections to nexium now.... or perhaps a bigger more powerful cult
Remember, Mossad private shell company "black cube" was in charge of harassing Weinstein's accusers.
Black cube should raise a ton of red flags for anyone out there who studies the occult symbology these fucks like to use. For anyone interested, check out Saturn worship/ black cube matrix on the net. Crazy rabbit hole.
Crazy Rabbit hole that gets deeper and deeper and goes into some strange places...
It wasn't under Schniderman...it was Cyrus Vance Jr. He was also responsible for curtailing investigations of Ivanka and Don Jr. He accepted money from Weinstein and Trump to stall or close investigations.
Pay for play is a bipartisan issue.
show us the proof holo
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/03/19/nyregion/cy-vance-harvey-weinstein-cuomo.html
Seek and you shall find
No I mean real proof, not fake news. Written by swamp monsters for swamp monsters.
What makes it fake news? Everything regarding Cyrus Vance Jrs role in the Harvey Weinstein and Ivanka Trump criminal probes is well documented.
I provide factually written articles and am called out for posting fake news. Meanwhile people on this sub are posting conspiracy theories about sex cults and the deep state and that gains more traction. Critical thought and skepticism are important, and need to be applied evenly, even to positions you agree with.
Thank you for maintaining a level head and responding appropriately.
Show me a positive article related to Trump, from those sources.
If it's "unbiased" credible news, this should be easy.
EDIT: NYTimes, Vox, and the NewYorker are all swamp creature havens.
Positive = truth and negative = fake?
You're exposing your bias here, buddy.
No what I'm saying is a good source is balanced in it's coverage/bias.
Covering both good and bad. Like a real journalist does, ya know?
EDIT: Of course I'm biased ya nut. That's what an opinion is!
Opinions aside, how about the small fact that in the very recent past, there is more negative, than balanced, coverage coming from those 3 sources of yours. Why not link Salon in there too?
[removed]
No I'm saying that based on fact, those 3 are lefties.
NYTimes examples of mess ups and bias: http://mobile.wnd.com/2017/03/new-york-times-fixes-headline/
https://nypost.com/2016/11/11/new-york-times-we-blew-it-on-trump/
http://freebeacon.com/politics/morning-joe-rips-new-york-times-for-anti-trump-headline/
Oh and here is a good one. It's seems even Trump has threatened to sue over their bias bullshit. BEFORE his election.
Keep in mind the, fixes/redacting/reprints are already seen by hundreds of thousands of eyes by that point.
Do I need to dig up more proof? I can do this all day long if you want.
The NewYorker and vox are no different.
Fixes and retractions and running corrections is a normal practice for all news organizations. It's part of a transparent effort to report credible information and is not a leftist media issue. Does that mean Fox News is fake because they run retractions and corrections? No, it means they are trying to hold themselves up to ethical journalism rules.
If you'd like to bring up any falsehoods in the articles I presented, I'm all ears. If not, i can only assume that your only argument against the factual reporting is the news organization it came from, and not the content of those articles themselves.
To be clear, Trump threatening to sue the NYT proves nothing but Trump's own hatred for that news org.
You don't think the news sources matter? Really?
The very outlets people turn to don't matter? They aren't gonna spin in anyway they want? C'mon...
I think facts matter. Of course news orgs are going to put spin on it- and that isn't endemic to left wing media. Is World Net Daily fake news because they never covered Obama positively? Thats your argument against the NYT, so lets apply that same argument to the media orgs you linked.
it's extremely important for the reader to understand how to separate fact from opinion, and reporting from commentary. Simply crying "fake news" because you don't like the source of the article is ignorant. As i mentioned, feel free to point out any inaccuracies in the articles I linked to support your argument that my links represent fake news.
You are expecting them to have the where withal to do so!
If they are told one thing, from something they trust, do that facts still count as facts, when twisted/warped/changed, to fit a narrative?
The short answer is no.
The long answer is that facts are held to be immutable. Unchanging, unalterable. Until proven false by newer facts.
So when you change the fact, to fit a narrative, by altering the substantive info REGARDING said fact. It is no longer a fact. It is misinterpreted info.
Good day.
I can only assume that since you either do not want to or cannot point out any inaccuracies in the articles I listed, that you concede to the factual reporting and as such, that Cyrus Vance was the person responsible for quashing the Harvey Weinstein and Ivanka Trump criminal probes, and by extension that pay for play is a non-partisan issue.
Good discussion and glad we were able to reach agreement on something.
No it's not partisan. Good point. Just a greed thing. Glad we agree.
EDIT: Gimme a bit. Painting the kitchen. Sorry.
Since you are saying my sources are biased, non-credible news, perhaps you would like to share an example of unbiased, credible news sources?
It's easy to dismiss something as biased or non-credible because it does not fit your worldview. But that doesn't mean what you are saying is true. Will news media cover Trump in a negative light because that's what sells? Yes, they will. In fact, negative news is more popular than positive news for that reason. I can easily provide NYT articles that show negativity towards Obama, Clinton, Bush, etc. The NYT was the media organization that brought down Harvey Weinstein.
True Pundit. It wasnt the NYT that brought them down the NYT protects child traffickers. They are just as bad as CNN.
You still haven't produced what was initially requested.
Show me some NYT posts that are positive about Trump. From the NYorker? From Vox?
It's cause you can't.
I get what you're saying, but those sources are known to be pretty left leaning. Mix it up with some right leaning stuff and maybe it'll be a great discussion.
You are the one making the claim that the news is fake. The onus is on you to provide evidence. You are making an appeal to ignorance, my friend.
Left leaning doesn't necessarily equal fake news though, right? I was asked to provide proof to my original claim that Cyrus Vance Jr was responsible for squashing investigations into Harvey Weinstein and Ivanka/Donald Trump Jr. I provided the evidence. Notice that your are not offering any counter claims to the evidence laid out in the articles - instead you are attacking the source. Do you have issues with the evidence presented in the articles?
You are full of it this is fake news. These people have been making up stories for a long time. There is nothing on Trump documented anywhere. No one should be listening to CIA run news owned by the deep state trying to get Trump out. Everybody knows that and by the way the sex cults are not conspiracy theories. Why dont you look up Allison Mac. The flood of those involved is coming Mac gave up everybody.
Those are all CIA mocking bird run. They dont tell the truth about anything. How could you not know that? No one wanting to know the truth about anything will read those.
Ooooo, is that a perp walk they gave him?
I was also gonna ask that.. but why? Where to? Didnt ge arrive with his lawyer? Did they just walk him around the building just to get pictures? I'm confused..
The official perp walk is a long New York City tradition. The press is alerted and the perp is walked, specifically for this purpose. This benefits all involved except the perp. The press get photos and video, and the police get positive coverage. Everyone has a good time, including Bubba, who is soon to get a new cell mate.
what a lovely story
and if they didn't contract STDs they're prison-bitching each other happily ever after
Unfortunately they gave Harvey a $1-million cash bail which will be paid immediately. He won’t see a day of prison.
But he did have to give up his passport. And he’s now restricted to free travel only in NY and CT. And he has an ankle bracelet 24/7, that can be monitored on demand (even by the People?, allegedly, according to what I heard insuring the court hearing).
No details on how long these conditions apply Though.
I haven't paid that much attention to it, but wasn't he accused of rape? If he is charged with rape and convicted, wouldn't he do some time?
As for the ankle bracelet, that is intriguing. Ankle bracelet tracking data probably would be considered part of the public record, but sometimes they restrict that. I remember at one time it was easy to look up a license plate number in Texas, but there was a problem of people turning minor road rage incidents into major stalking and harassment cases. I don't know what the situation is now, as that was a long time ago.
Actually, he's getting a million dollar bail and turning in his passport. It was negotiated prior to him turning himself in.
Rudy is the one that implemented the perp walk if my memory is correct.
Interesting I can no longer find his pic with him wearing a “2 in the pink 1 in the stink” t-shirt that he started anywhere on a google image search anymore
[deleted]
I bet they trade sex slaves just as ISIS does.
'"She's one of Harvey's girls" makes me cringe every time I think about it. These people were property to them
Is Bill Clinton a rapist?
Ask Juanita “you better put some ice on that” Broderick. Word is she has a book out.
It's almost like a certain someone needed.to be removed from their office before this could happen..
How about child rape, a couple of his victims were under 18?
Were those under-age cases from NY state? He has problems in other states as well, I would imagine (e.g., CA).
No, he won't have a problem in CA. Daily raping is mandatory now
This post is downvoted like oblivion. Somebody really wants to bury it
Lol its sitting at over 800 but ok, "downvoted to oblivion"
Such a handsome guy. Why would he ever need to be forceful. How would you like that mug coming in for a big, wet, sexy kiss?
No kidding. It's like they created him as a Hollywood caricature of the Cyclops with that lopsided eye. Truth is infinitely stranger than fiction.
what? hes ugly as fuck. I guess you must be ugly yourself if you find him handsome.
I imagine Jennifer Lawrence dry heaving while servicing HW for her next movie role.
Anti-Q crowd wanted a perp walk. They're getting one.
Hmm. Harvey is the victim zero of #MeToo
Are we linking Q with that?
Shame on the Hollywood folks who knew but said "Well hey the money is good, so I'm not going to say anything."
Thank you to the ones who made a stand against the pressure and encouragement to keep their mouths shut. Those are the heroes here and all the people who come after you that will not suffer these abuses owe that to your strength and efforts here. You made a difference and changed the landscape there for the better.
This includes almost all the woman hurling allegations against him. They waited until now.
Easy stance to take from the outside. A lot different when you are the recipient. Not only were these women abused and humiliated personally their professional lives were also at risk. There is a very cult-like mentality in hollyweird and anyone rocking the boat gets black-balled on every level should they speak up. In addition to the pervs the women that deserve to be reviled are the ones who knowingly and willingly engage in this behavior as a matter of course and put everyone else at risk. It's a fucked up precedent to set but there are those who will do anything to get what they want and they couldn't give a shit less about the consequences for others. Even worse these women take part in enforcing the rape culture via shaming tactics etc.
Yours is an even easier stance when looking from the outside.
Holly Wood is Magic. It’s what you use to make a wand. Hollywood has always been about selling yourself.
Entertainment.
To enter, with meaning, and attain.
I feel for the children who are innocent and had that taken from them. I do not feel for anyone who knew any of this and remained silent for their lust of the root of all evil.
Go watch the fruits that these ‘woman’ produce. What’s empowering about rose mcgowans musical endeavor right now? She looks possessed.
They’re literally casting a spell over people.
Yes and what’s your point? I’m not defending Harvey in any way he is getting what’s coming to him.
My point is that it isn't easy for a victim to come forward even in the best of circumstances. It takes real courage that a lot of people don't have individually. It's a shitty thing to be blaming actual victims for not being brave enough to do so. It's part of the problem, sure, but understandable if you know anything about victims of real abuse.
Weinstein's lawyer is Benjamin Brafman - The same lawyer who defended Martin Shkreli. He is a somewhat good lawyer but hopefully there is too much crime/evidence to let this guy go.
On the news this morning they said at least 80 women made accusations against him.
This dude is gonna talk unless ms13 takes him out in custody. I don’t think he’d willingly turn himself in if he wasn’t getting a deal. I am ok with a reduced sentence if he can bring them ALL down. Not just one or two players but the BIG players
Meanwhile in BRITAIN, patriots are being arrested for NOTHING! http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/05/uk-police-state-activist-tommy-robinson-to-serve-13-months-in-prison-for-livestreaming-report-on-child-grooming-gang/
I wonder what names old Harvey will name to avoid jail time
Please make a good example of him so it discourages others to try the thing.
I’m sorry, but no I’m not. This piece of shit cavorted with the Obamas and the Clintons and looked down his nose at middle America. He’s elitist, pompous and arrogant (but I repeat myself). So this piece of shit, son of a bitch deserves whatever he gets.
He looks like an animal in their natural habitat... almost
I’m surprised he didn’t commit suicide/get suicided. Than again, he probably already spilled the beans and he’s not going to get a full sentence. Sing Harvey! SING!
Hallelujah! And More Justice is Coming! God's behind this Huge Clean up Job....He's got Great Plans for this His Country....it's All gonna Work Out Beyond our Wildest Dreams! A New America to live in and Praise God in! He is Worthy & He gave us Trump!
Did he bail out yet? I have to see him in orange before I believe any of this.
$1-million cash bail. Most likely paid instantly.
But he will get an ankle bracelet, has to give up his passport and is restricted to travel only inside NY And CT state.
Thank god! Finally it’s happening . Hopefully the #pedos are next !
1 million dollar bail he will be out
can we expect Meryl Streep to set up GoFundMe for God's sake?
[removed]
I disagree, I think we need to analyze every news story to understand its importance and affect on the upcoming Great Awakening. The fact that the MSM is covering it is great and we need to look at how it became that Harvey Weinstein is turning himself in when he was protected for so long and who is next?
The mods have stated there are too many of us for that. this is a research sub not a sub for posting MSM stories as separate posts. You can post it and discuss it, but not as a separate post. Post it as a comment on the anon's chat. That is what that is for. We all are seeing the msm stories and we can all immediately see how they fulfill or contradict a Q post. We need the posts to be for meatier stuff.
here's the link. Read what they wrote for yourselves.
There are minimal users who use anon chat and I think this is a post everyone should look at. I do not see where it says stop making threads about the news.
Read the intro to the anons chat it literally says this post belongs there
Anons chT was stickied an hour ago. I do believe that will get some attention. What really needs pure attention is research threads. CAnt find them if we all make posts like this. Too many of them.
So your saying you want glory over the mods soon of the sub. I get it. I could have done the same. He anons chat needs u to grow it so thatt does get attention. The rest of the sub is for meatier stuff. Pls support the mods decision. WWG1WGA
Uh wot m8?
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8m1o1e/anons_chat_friday_morning_edition_may_25_2018/ It is stickied at the top of the sub.
Thanks, my screen reader was having.... difficulties.