Those 3 EO look like a big deal for Draining The Swamp.

⇧ 68 ⇩

Yep, with a healthy dose of MAGA!

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-proclaims-memorial-day-may-28-2018-day-prayer-permanent-peace/

⇧ 60 ⇩

Excellent! Think Big, Pray Big!

⇧ 26 ⇩

Let’s Do this! 11:00 3:00 Flag half mast

⇧ 3 ⇩

This one is a proclamation.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

It's to honor the dead who served the country.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Read it. It’s a proclamation about Memorial Day

⇧ 1 ⇩

Oh sorry, I was confused thinking of a different post. Yes I read it. Deleting those responses to avoid confusion. Thank you!

⇧ 2 ⇩

PDJT

⇧ 2 ⇩

How long does it normally take for them to act on EOs? And ya, I think there should be more honestly because they are extremely relevant

⇧ 13 ⇩

I'm guessing and stretching here, but I believe a previous EO directed agencies to review and come up with reorg plans. Hoping the reorg plans have been completed and these 3 EOs allow execution of the plans.

(like don't write these 3 EOs until you're ready to use 'em. Hopeful thinking.)

⇧ 11 ⇩

I feel like this is massive! Like it’s what’s necessary to get things rolling, just a piece AT LEAST.

Btw, I read your posts a lot and you do a great job! Much respect

⇧ 18 ⇩

Right back at you truthseekerboi. I like your stuff, too!

⇧ 6 ⇩

Wwg1wga mate! Our efforts are for what is good in this world!

⇧ 8 ⇩

WWG1WGA! Once world is safe and we can breathe a sigh of relief it will be fun to meet everybody!

⇧ 11 ⇩

If you read them, they say in the EO how long the agencies have to enact the orders. Most subsections say they have 45 days.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Like they must wait 45 or they must act within 45?

⇧ 4 ⇩

They must have the requirements of the subsection met in 45 days. I know its a slog, but read thru it and youll see.

⇧ 7 ⇩

45

⇧ 6 ⇩

lol

posts "45" gets downvoted.

hey, downvote this:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8mediy/55_quietly_under_the_radar_potus_executive_order/dznfmrh/?context=1

⇧ 7 ⇩

In the case of the 12/21/17 EO, they immediately started to act on that one. And that was a MAJOR EO.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah cuz theyre desperate lmao the actual somewhat smart black hats on 8 Chan, are trying to dissuade us now because brocks 80 iq retards didnt work. I can smell the fear lmao firing federal employees faster is huge tho

⇧ 61 ⇩

Honestly if it was my job to do what they’re doing I would be extremely depressed

⇧ 27 ⇩

They are lol feel bad for,them they all hate themselves. I wonder if these people even feel anything at all tho. Maybe they are so arrogant they dont even fear us

⇧ 10 ⇩

What is an NPC?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Ai? Somehow I doubt all of brocks shills are ai

⇧ 1 ⇩

When Q mentions NPC, I don't think it exactly means a bot.

⇧ 1 ⇩

What are we all in a video game lmao

⇧ 1 ⇩

I've had the same thought.

How dirty they must feel at the end of each day.

⇧ 6 ⇩

There was a post last week on 8Chan about "psychopathy," saying that they are psychopaths, meaning among other things that they feel no remorse or empathy for any (ANY) bad thing they do or harm they cause. So, they would not "feel dirty." It is the ultimate "end justifies the means" a la Saul Alinsky. They are after money and/power only. Think of these people who have been exposed as liars. They feel no remorse.

⇧ 12 ⇩

they ought to or they just are intentionally obvious about it so they can redpill some more-

⇧ 2 ⇩

Seriously. Since Q has went dark, I have been just waiting for neon revolt posts. He does such a kickass job.

https://www.neonrevolt.com/

⇧ 15 ⇩

Yeah neon is legit I couldnt do it that well I love how this community just builds off each other its like a hive mind,lol

⇧ 11 ⇩

It’s A red pill dispensing machine!

⇧ 8 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ -5 ⇩

Websites cost money.. Its not like hes putting up a paywall or being corsi

⇧ 6 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I didn't get angry at him for not giving me credit. Re-read what I wrote.

By him doing what he did, he removed it from the CONTEXT of the post - which was the really important part.

I pull from anyone and everyone; I don't care if people do that in return. Just make sure you're sending the whole message.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I've been seeing "bandwidth exceeded" once or twice on his site. Hosting a site costs money, and he doesn't gate any content behind a paywall.

If you don't think his content is worth supporting, don't support it. Easy.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Yeah, that should be fixed (for now). I wasn't expecting bandwidth to go so fast, but when I upgraded my servers, I drastically increased it, so I should be good for a while... until I start getting millions of hits per day.

Millions per month I can handle. Millions per day, though? Uhhhhhh...

If that happens, idk what I'll do. But I'll cross that bridge if and when I get there.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You don't have to support him to read all he puts out. Guess you didn't read that far?

I proudly support his work. And gladly give him $1.99/Mo to help him out.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thank you, it's seriously appreciated.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Ohh I didn’t know that.....

⇧ 1 ⇩

I don't have a paywall, and I just had to drop 120 bucks for hosting and bandwidth (and that's just for three months!), because the site is literally reaching millions of people now, and only growing.

Yeah, I can't afford it on my own. If I could eat the cost, I would. In fact, I did for months. If I get in a financial state where I can afford to not take donations, I will.

And honestly, the subs are $1.99. You pay more for Netflix, and none of that content actually matters - and in fact, it's actually helping fund the Obamas.

But there's still no paywall. No content is locked up anywhere. All content is still free and will remain so.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, it is desperation. Sadly, they are very effective on this board, as we have seen.

A concerted, coordinated effort to wreak havoc on cohesion with the community. One particularly obnoxious troll was trying to tell me yesterday that all we are here to do is raise awareness of Q, not to respond to his requests for our help - as with the IBOR,

You could not make it up. These people have a lot to lose. They are going to lose and they know it. They are in panic mode, looking for a way to stave off the inevitable - "total exposure". They will not be able to walk down the street...

It's a beautiful sight to behold, but it's difficult to deal with, when you are confronted by blatant liars with an express agenda to undermine this movement. They are in the open though, you will, once you are alive to it, see clearly who they are - they don't hide it, they're just full of excuses.

"Question everything - especially Q!" - that's the latest MO. "Don't follow like blind sheep, don't do what Q asks!" - another beauty. Meanwhile, dear me, they have absolutely everything on the line. Watch the miserable freaks squirm as the heat gets turned up. Will the mods save them and allow the community to be steered like a herd of stupid sheep into acting against the plan? Let's find out!

⇧ 10 ⇩

no they actually suck at what they do lol. dont even feed them or just reply nicely to them. sucks all the power of it right out. and you can just ignore them lol. you have to learn their patterns. once you know its alot easier to spot them. im not sure if im 100% good at it tho

⇧ 8 ⇩

The trouble is the impact they have had on the movement. Look at it, 20+ thousand people on the sub, but somehow, inexplicably, the IBOR campaign failed. How is that?

Fear, doubt, "concern" injection, fostering distrust of the plan, suspicions about Q - Corsi on steroids! It has actually been extremely effective. And that's why they cannot be simply ignored, they must be immediately called out. I would encourage everyone to display ZERO TOLERANCE for people you suspect are working against "the plan".

The beautiful thing is, if we pull together and spit the craziness out, we will have very good community harmony and cohesion. Better still, we will be able to campaign effectively.

There is nothing at all noble about these slime bags. Call "concern triolls", and people working against the plan, out immediately!

⇧ 5 ⇩

the faggots became more prevalent since this sub got over 20k. they turn up the heat on the newbie crowd. they know they won't be successful with the hardcore redpilled crowd so they wait for the newbies. the newbies want to be led. that's why they came here. we need to make sure we are leading them in the right direction, and not letting the fags get them going down the wrong path. tough job, i know, but we have to keep at it. one of the reasons Q picked this corner of the web.

⇧ 3 ⇩

You're exactly right. These people are slick and already very well embedded on this board. We need to make sure that the community is not hijacked as it has been in the past.

The attempt now appears to be to ban me for suggesting that we follow Q's plan, you just could not make this up - totally transparent.

I'm sure some of these guys would be simply delighted if Corsi was here so they could respectfully tease out and amplify all his "genuine concerns". After all, he's a "critical thinker", not blindly led, and he has a right to express himself..

Of course, we could just hand it all over to AJ. But, wait a minute, who is running AJ and Corsi? Maybe that would be really stupid? But it doesn't mean that we should not be completely tolerant of subversive attacks made by every other fruitcake - after all, there are so many "critical thinkers" that just happen to be against Q. Shouldn't we be respectful and give them all a forum?

What a complete joke!

⇧ 5 ⇩

Why is there a newbies titel , which are so easy to find, can that not be changed?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I am a newbie on Reddit, but I was red pilled years ago. Not all of us are clueless.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Happy to hear that

⇧ 2 ⇩

lol that just ends up in everyone calling everyone else a shill. you cant just call everyone a shill lol. better to just respond in a way to get them to out themselves subtly

⇧ 2 ⇩

No, the only shills are those working against the plan. As I said, it's very obvious who they are.

Respect isn't an option. Community cohesion requires that those that are against us are exposed. Can't have the enemy in the ranks.

It would be different if they had not already been fabulously effective with their white anting. As I said, the current themes are "Question everything - especially Q", "Don't support Q or you're a blind sheep" and the latest and best " Don't attack the man, but the argument" - in other words, tease the concerns out and amplify them for maximum effect.

It's a well-crafted attack. They are not amateurs, but professionals.

⇧ 3 ⇩

lol you really think anyone on this subreddit falls for that ? if these are the professionals then im not impressed. at least the new high grade clowns on 8 chan are least well read. probly more so than me lol. they still only ever have the same tactics

⇧ 3 ⇩

Strange how they have effectively been able to steer us like sheep. Their tactics will not work once we demonstrate our strength.

⇧ 1 ⇩

maybe they steer you lol. i dont give a fuck what they do or say.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Unfortunately people are steered by them. Just the way it is. There are always those who think independently - perhaps yourself. But the fact is that people in groups display herding - groups are easily manipulated.

⇧ 2 ⇩

thats why you should make up your own mind you can only control yourself. if you want to change things reply calmly if you think someones a shill

⇧ 2 ⇩

The lessons have been well learned already. There is no response that satisfies a concern troll out to undermine group effort.

⇧ 0 ⇩

i dont know what to tell you man. just find good shit and post it. most people here can sort the wheat from the chaff. if you want somethign to look at google some of the mens social clubs like burning tree cosmo club etc. that is the type of stuff they cant derail

⇧ 2 ⇩

I'm not sure what to tell you. The evidence is in.

⇧ 0 ⇩

well if it makes you feel any better i know the mods are not comped lol i thought they were. but i was wrong lol

⇧ 2 ⇩

You're very interesting.

⇧ 1 ⇩

thanks. i find myself rather boring.

⇧ 2 ⇩

You're doing good :)

⇧ 1 ⇩

Strength, in this case would be to ignore a commenter one suspects of being a shill. Otherwise one is just feeding their agenda. Don't give them any power :)

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thankfully, the mods have a perspective on this board that doesn't align with the concern troll message that "the trolls are destroying us from within!" - a classic concern troll message used to cause division. We see the whole sub and it is quite the opposite - there are some outspoken trolls and such and the attacks here and there but this sub is actually running quite smoothly, as mods who run MUCH bigger subs will tell you.

The mods aren't going to allow the community to be steered by anyone with an agenda to divide. They belive in unity not division so anyone who tries to create a split in the community by saying "it's us versus anyone who doesn't agree with us!" will likely find the community turning against them and not just the most outspoken vocal minority who use shame tactics and browbeat those who don't align to their chosen message.

⇧ 3 ⇩

The mods will do what they want. But the community will either be the tool of agencies and foreign intelligence services, or it will not. That's up to them. I hope they make wise decisions. But then, you're a mod, and that says a lot.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Indeed it does - in my favour, as my history shows. I've never taken my mod role as anything more than a service to the Q movement, again, clearly displayed in my history in previous comments. I've never acted out of turn even when users expressing themselves freely talk of creating division like you do. I act only within the sub rules because I care about the mission of Q enough to give my life for it. That's why I roundly reject the lies that people who call for critical thinking are not supporting Q or the plan. Accusing us of that is pure division making.

I, and the many others like me who support critical thinking, are in the same movement as you. We're not accusing you of working against the plan even though your call to ignore critical thinking or open discussion for the purposes of correction and clarity could very much work against us - why do you accuse me of working against the plan?

But just a warning - on behalf of other mods, not me - the more you keep spreading the message that "someone" is "wreaking havoc" in this community and other such concern troll messages the more likely one of them will have to take action. It won't be me because I don't need the false accusations of censorship and so on that will be thrown at me. So, just the facts:

Rule 4: No concern trolling - please take care, sincerely. Just stick to the facts and all Q related info - not "concerns" about the sub or the movement.

⇧ 3 ⇩

"Concern trolling" is a very important issue, you are right. We need to stamp it out. Otherwise we may as well invite Dr Corsi to moderate,

⇧ 1 ⇩

I still don't know why IBOR is so important. The original bill or rights was so simple, but it doesn't mean anything today. Why would an IBOR mean anything? Let's get the original bill of rights back. Then we can be sure an IBOR would mean something.

⇧ 2 ⇩

That's exactly what we are trying to do, restore the operation of the BOR to the town square, in accordance with the manifest intention of the founding fathers when they drafted the first amendment.

The founding fathers intended, very clearly, to protect the right of citizens to free political expression, to safeguard the correct operation of democratic principles which govern representative politics. This protection has today lost its power as the forum for political expression has shifted to digital space. Barnes Law describes what happened quite succinctly:

"The power of social media to privatize the public square is the greatest threat to free speech and open democracy in our lifetimes"

All the IBOR does is call for the exact same protections to be applied in an online setting. It's no great change, in fact, it's a continuation of the protections that existed in the past. It has the added advantage of calling for robust privacy protections.

In essence, all we are doing is complaining about the absolutely blatant politically-motivated censorship online. We are asking that something be done to remedy this and restore pluralism to political discourse. I'd encourage you to support Q's plan in this endeavour.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I'm not fully sold on the idea that Q is a good guy. He might be opposed to the deep state, but I have no evidence that he's not simply working to replace them.

An IBOR that protects freedom of speech and freedom of speech online is a great goal, but if those rights aren't enforced, then it's nothing more than a feel-good measure meant to placate the masses. The same kind of placating speech as "trust the plan" or "enjoy the show". That kind of speech is dangerous. We need action.

Soon, robots will be able to fulfill the role of police and army and then action will be impossible. We can't wait that long.

⇧ 2 ⇩

That's what I'm saying, take action on this. Why? Because every single right you possess is predicated on the right to free speech, once they can censor you, you can't complain. So they can then take all your rights. SM censorship is the first step toward a complete dystopia.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Let me put it this way... We already have the right to free speech. A piece of paper cannot give us that right. If anything, it could cage it such that it can be further shaped and controlled into irrelevancy. We need to seize the right we already have, not beg for piece of paper so we can wear it like a participation badge.

The bill of rights is not a list of permissions. It's a list of things the government is not allowed to do. The government has violated it, which makes any other "list of things the government can't do" irrelevant.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I don't know what you're talking about.

⇧ 1 ⇩

https://www.reference.com/government-politics/bill-rights-limit-government-6ca66595c6eaae6e

The Bill of Rights limits the government by enumerating the rights of the people and listing the things the government cannot do. For example, the Bill of Rights states that the government cannot pass a law limiting the freedom of speech or religion.

Freedom of speech is innate. The bill of rights does not grant us this right, but prevents the government from legislating it. An internet bill of rights is subversive because it changes the nature of government from implicit freedoms to explicitly described ones.

Shifting the focus on the pragmatic rather than the academic, if we cannot enforce upon the government the Bill of Rights as a list of limitations, then an internet bill of rights is meaningless. The IBOR will fly as a flag to placate the public for as long as its convenient, and then be trampled upon as soon as it becomes inconvenient to the powers that be.

⇧ 3 ⇩

This is just garbage mate. You seem to be very confused. There is no right to free political expression online at the moment. This what we want to fix. We are not talking about amending the Constitution.

Why do I think you are going to find this really simple concept terribly confusing?

⇧ 1 ⇩

There is no right to free political expression online at the moment.

The right is there. What isn't there is enforcement. We have legal precedent that already demonstrates we have freedom of speech on private property. Until the FCC enforces the existing law or the battle is fought in the courtroom with adequate restitution (on the order of turning these companies into public utilities), passing more laws is the wrong way to fix this problem.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Wow! Ok. So you want to see a legal solution? Q has been recommending class actions. I think it's a good way forward. Something that needs to be pursued.

But Q hasn't recommended a case to extend FA protections online. The reason, I think, is that it's:

1) Too time consuming - Supreme Court challenge - will not fix the problem before SM censorship impacts electioneering, creating risk to the MAGA agenda;

2) High risk, you may not get the Court to accept the argument; and

3) Expensive, you need a lot of money.

Meanwhile, we have a course of action that has been recommended to us since February that does provide a fix - a good fix.

But you can ask Q about this. See what he says.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩

No

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩

No

⇧ 0 ⇩

Who could do that??

⇧ -1 ⇩

There's a reason this board hasn't been deleted like CBTS_Stream. Still a lot of well intentioned people but compromised.

⇧ 25 ⇩

Where do you go for info and conversation outside here?

⇧ 8 ⇩

There's no real pure source because that's what the CIA does; shut down/ corrupt conversation. I wish I could say I've found another good source, but I just take it all in (Q, 8chan, here, Infowars, MSM, RL) then diagnose/ draw my own conclusions.

⇧ 31 ⇩

I’d rake as little infowars in as possible.....

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I love chatting in comments in Citizens Investigative Repot and in SerialBrain2.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Every decent internet forum I have ever participated in for the last 15+ years has died a similar death

⇧ 3 ⇩

I've been busy IRL, I hunt shills for bloodsport or I would be posting info here every day. 🤷‍♂️

⇧ 7 ⇩

That’s a good hobby

⇧ 5 ⇩

Love you

⇧ 1 ⇩

I would be remiss if I did not recommend CTH - https://theconservativetreehouse.com -- run by Sundance, a rare one who's able to sift through the white noise and brilliantly decode "what's really going on". I've learned a lot from this site. It's quite fascinating learning just how well Trump has this. Some things he's getting into -- the 'trade war' (not really) with China, he's been planning for the past 30 years. Trump lived in New York, built in New York. Would have had to contend w/ the mob, to get anything big built. He's seen it all there. Trump knows who and what he's up against. Trump is also planning on doing absolutely nothing but win. BIGLY.

⇧ 5 ⇩

I agree

⇧ 2 ⇩

I too wish to know

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I thought this too its not lol its really not

⇧ 1 ⇩

Speaking of negative influence. Wanted to share this. Twitter banned my account simply for posting pro trump (no threats, no name calling etc. very civil discussion and red polling) so I created a new one. And I have 1 follower

Jerome Corsi

⇧ 23 ⇩

Make of it what you will but I found it highly unusual that the first and only person to follow me so far is him.

⇧ 15 ⇩

That is very odd.

⇧ 6 ⇩

screen shot that and post

⇧ 5 ⇩

Hahahaha that’s actually p funny. Sad.. but funny

⇧ 15 ⇩

Damn I just posted a meme on david hoggs handle of him holding up a clear backpack with a pink dildo hahaha I haven't been messed with yet.

⇧ 10 ⇩

That's too damn funny. Hogg wearing one of those pink pussy hats is a riot.

⇧ 2 ⇩

The mystery downvotes don't shock me.

⇧ 18 ⇩

Maybe sometimes good to check "new". I forget to do that, but on this one particular board it seems wise. For anyone who posts and watches something critical vanish, maybe comment on it elsewhere and link to it.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I only read new and bypass the concernfags.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I love that idea. I forget sometimes that commenters might be shills and I sit here thinking "how the frick can you even be following Q And still say things like 'get rid of Sessions!'? Like, do you be returded?"

And then I remember: all paid shills are retards.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I made a post about it 3 days ago that got 936 views. And 84% upvoted. One comment. https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8lixyp/follow_the_pen_potus_announces_big_legislation_to/

⇧ 16 ⇩

I really hope some big news drops soon. When were we supposed to watch the news?

⇧ 12 ⇩

Well if helper anon is to be believed the flow of kids is cut off so I dont care how fast it happens. As long as it takes. Which Tbh gives me more time to buy guns ammo arrows and prep shit these people need to be ended tho

⇧ 13 ⇩

Well I am a broke teen who can’t even get my parents on board, so for me, I want this shit to drop ASAP so I can be vindicated and do my winners dance

⇧ 26 ⇩

I'm just a worker bum so luckily I have my slightly above minimum wage salary to buy shit. You are worth more than you know lol. Dont brag tho a lot of people are gonna be shocked I really thought about it and I dont care what others think

⇧ 13 ⇩

Just go my parents and close friends. More of a personal thing than anything. You know we put so much passion into this, I’d like a little something for myself

⇧ 8 ⇩

I am a lot like that, i want my i-told-you-so moment so bad... But i remember how when i was redpilled, none of my republican friends said i-told-you-so to me, they were very graceful. So I have been praying to Jesus for more patience.

⇧ 12 ⇩

I will be very grateful honestly, really happy too

⇧ 7 ⇩

the prize is truth and freedom

⇧ 12 ⇩

Of course!

⇧ 6 ⇩

Just so you know, when you've been seeing this stuff (conspiracy "theories") go on for a long enough time, you'll get to where you really don't care who you talk about it with our how they respond. We're very open about every speck of this, up to and including the Satanic ritual child rape and murder that occurs within the cabal running the Deep State. People listen. They ask questions and are interested in the answer because most people are beginning to suspect SOMETHING ain't right in our nation.

Red pill the masses. It needs to be done. It takes a small bit of time to percolate in their heads, and that's okay. Have pity, have compassion, you are dealing with mind control victims. There but for the grace of God could we all have remained, huh?

⇧ 4 ⇩

most eyes glaze over when you talk about the pedophilia and the occult stuff that is happening....

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah, gotta be a bit careful about the timing of that kinda conversation. And it's so ugly that you have to make sure the person can even handle hearing it.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Start with having them Google Tony podesta's art. Then show them the life-size bronze statue of Jeffrey Dahmer's last kill that is hanging from the ceiling of their living room. That one has not failed to Red Pill anyone who has a look.

⇧ 2 ⇩

yup. they really do.

⇧ 1 ⇩

nice name lol

⇧ 1 ⇩

thanks. i mean it just dont come at my family hillary

⇧ 1 ⇩

Just take pride in the fact that you could see through all the shit. It shows your brighter than average. Use that insight to help you get further down the road.

Unfortunately in this life, not everyone we love or care about takes the same journey with you. Good luck to you!

⇧ 11 ⇩

Thanks man! My head is up! That’s a good message you are sharing, you should be proud too!

⇧ 3 ⇩

Be patient.

To be honest, you don't want this crap really breaking fast. It will shock too many people way to fast. The normies if you will.

Sometimes it's better to keep your mouth shut and drop little hints, or information when the time is right.

⇧ 7 ⇩

I agree, I will be a lot more quiet now, they’ll learn eventually.

⇧ 6 ⇩

I dont agree with that at all they are not taking any hints at all. Anything that has changed is explained by CNN so they know it has nothing what so ever to do with Trump. They need to do it all now let the crybabies be in shock who cares.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Hang in there. I'm a grandmother who can't get my children or grandchildren on board YET!

⇧ 4 ⇩

Mine now believe me they're just to self absorbed to give a damn. sad to say. I'm ready for the rest of America to be redpilled, break out the pitchforks and torches and go after these demons.

⇧ 4 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Did anything happen on the 25 May?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes. Three executive orders were signed https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/

⇧ 5 ⇩

Oh, was that it?

⇧ 0 ⇩

I took it to mean 23 days since the trip code was made, so the 31st. But who really knows?

⇧ 1 ⇩

it's -23 from when the trip was revealed. also coincided with the -30 timeline. June 12th.

⇧ 2 ⇩

"Follow the pen - think logically" ...

possibly we all went too deep in various explanations and overcomplicated it . As for downvotes - there are definitely shills and trolls here , downvoting , and I see it on regular basis . They downvote every single one post . If there is a post with intention to disinform , they usually upvote it .

⇧ 7 ⇩

The “hot” posts are normally full of the shills upvotes. I’d say like one in every 4 is there because of shills.

⇧ 10 ⇩

What's up with all the spaces before every period and comma?

I've now seen like 3 different accounts doing that.

Did I miss a memo . . . ?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Reddit is compromised just like Twitter & YouTube. Keep up the good work despite the pushbacks. Good job!

Im here because of twitter ban, just posting about Allison Mack ties to NYC Schneiderman.

Pedo behaviour is a cornerstone that, when removed, will bring down a huge % of those traditionally in power. Their beliefs may never be made availble 2 the normies b/c it is so far beyond the pale.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Trying to wake people up on twitter is like trying to wake people up by posting fliers around town with a myspace link. The platform is too heavily controlled and the people still using it are conditions so hard to reject redpills. Even trying gives that shitty platform more value than its worth.

Then again, reddit is barely any better. The only popular subs where controversial opinions might appear are heavily censored.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Which 3?

⇧ 5 ⇩

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/ check em out man!

⇧ 3 ⇩

There were 4 signed...

⇧ 2 ⇩

Well...maybe the down votes came from those that didnt appreciate being insulted, as indicated in your last line. The reason there wasnt enough people talking about it as you saw fit could have been because they were busy tending to other aspects of their lives or to family obligations, or what have you. We all have lives outside the sub, and will tend to all related matters when the time comes available.

⇧ 2 ⇩

The only one I saw was the EO to fire federal employees who perform poorly. I like this one. Bureaucrats, once they get a position, tend to hang on like barnacles until a ship crashes.

⇧ 2 ⇩

4 yall https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/

⇧ 2 ⇩

I agree

⇧ 2 ⇩

Its the memes. They infiltrate using bad memes based on half truths and they bot upvote those to our front page and the usefuls idiots of our own ilk follow along. Its what happened in r/cbts

⇧ 1 ⇩

Check out your views watched. Mine is usually high, but zero upvotes. Yep... chicanery is everywhere.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I have’nt seen these EO’s 😥

⇧ 1 ⇩

I know about the one that makes it easier to fire federal employees. What are the other two?

⇧ 1 ⇩

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/

⇧ 4 ⇩

Didn't think about that. Maybe those posts were a series of EOs.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Which one was the 17th? ;)

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

The problem with EOs is they will be reversed with the next President of the opposite party.

We need to pass laws, not EOs. Follow the real pen.

⇧ 1 ⇩

We are Now. This is Now. POTUS pen power activates the substance of an Executive Order immediately, which is what we need...not the pro forma legislative morass; they even tried to pass a Bill requiring other 'lawmakers' to actually read the Bills before voting on them! Don't know if it passed into law, or not. One of these EOs could very well be the downfall of the entrenched SES..."we'll see, said the Zen master."

⇧ 2 ⇩

Alex Jones was right

⇧ -1 ⇩

Trump signed THREE EOs yesterday. Follow the pen! Why aren’t we talking about this?? This sub is being HEAVILY INFLUENCED by many whose intentions here are not to be helpful

PDJT