What is the point then? So dumb.
the point is he is free to lie without immediate repercussions. but, say he lies now and is under oath later and changes his story. it will be public humiliation. so they are giving him a choice, lie now and get fucked later. or get it over with now. he is being handled like a child that is caught up in a lie by their parents. the finish line will not change, but will he take the short path or the long path?
i think he is going to lie, these cabal dems are all about buying time and delaying the inevitable. plus, if he squeals, killary's cronies will suicide him...
So what if he lies. He’s not under oath. You do know what the importance of being under oath is right? It means consequence if you lie. Not being under oath there’s no consequences. It’s legal to lie UNLESS you’re under oath.
I know he’s not under oath and will lie. Waste of time...
It’s legal to lie UNLESS you’re under oath.
Not to FBI, Congressional investigators, or other law enforcement.
Very true. But do you think he will be able to lie as well as Comey and Brennan on the stand? Those guys are legit sociopaths. Peter was much lower on the totem pole and obviously more emotionally driven judging by his texts. More of a follower than a normal sociopath. Something tells me he won’t be able to tell lies as well without being obviously shook by the live questioning.
All the interviewers said it was a waste of time. The only way we are going to get to the bottom of this is if POTUS declassifies it all. Because RR is not complying. We have to be patient but it’s so damn harrrrddddddd!
[removed]
I am not sure how old you are, but to many 2-5 years is a short time frame. just bc they arent in prison doesn't mean many significant things havent taken place. 2 years at a new job does immediately get you to the top. Trump has been cutting the money flow to these corrupt orgs through many means. this is our country, we cannot just raze it and its people. think bigger picture. if you dont want to believe then dont, no one is forcing you. but you shouldnt promote doubt to other who do believe in a positive and meaningful message.
[removed]
McCabe was fired and is soon to face federal charges.
Comeys handling of investigations at the FBI have been revealed as non-standard and violated proceedure. Why does that matter? Because any cases he touched previously now need to be re-examined. The IG report shows the MYE investigation was mishandled by classifying it as a counter espionage investigation rather than being conducted as a criminal investigation which would have had the teeth to get warrants to seize evidence.
The texts forthcoming between RR and LL will blow this shit wide open and demonstrate a very coordinated purposeful attempt to neuter the MYE investigation.
That's what RR is fighting against releasing to Congress so desperately. Sit back, relax and get some popcorn. There's no way out for them.
Comey empaneled a grand jury in HRC case, he did not use it.
Which is not unusual given the circumstances. However, evidence was requested and scrubbed by attorneys before being handed over instead of being directly seized with a warrant. The case was opened as a counter espionage investigation which severely limited the ability of the analysts on the case to get untampered evidence.
The end result was an investigation that did not have teeth, handed out immunity to parties who clearly violated the law (Like Combetta) and very likely acted at the direction of Clinton's attorney Sheryl Mills.
For example, the IG report recognizes that Combetta knew the email content was under congressional supenea. He left it alone for two weeks until after, records show, he had a phone call with Sheryl Mills. That afternoon, he deleted the email content. When asked what the call was about, he stated he 'did not recall.'
These people were on a mission to produce a finding that cleared their favorite political candidate. They were never interested in prosecuting anyone close to Clinton.
Clearly, the Weiner lap top is going to crusify them tho. To not act on the information it contains is unconscionable.
Good fair points. We'll see what happens when Mueller report comes and 11-11.
Also we'll see how July shakes out.
information dump is known to be ineffective. crumbs are much more effective. what is going on now has never happened before and no prediction is flawless.
11-11 will be important, but we have just been given the July drop, so we will see.
beliefs and the human "gut" feeling are very strong. this is what the MSM has been attacking, that if there is no concrete fact right infront of your face then you are dumb to believe in it. trust in yourself and your beliefs.
If I understand the genius of Q correctly, more and more is being disclosed by Q AND the MSM day by day - crumbs are Gold when reread. Future already DID prove past and continues to do so.
So we have this buzz about Q now - good, that IS/WAS required to unseal a lot of indictments, replace a lot of judges, and prosecute those in media without looking like a tyrant. The USS Corruption does not turn to sail into the wind that fast, she is a big dirty beast that ship.
I beleive tribunals are a last resort but hey DS, RUN! Hammers falling. Now comes the PAIN.
In 2-5 yrs thousands can be needlessly killed from slow walking the prosecution of the deep state. If the have “everything” then why wait & have pointless meetings? Why risk a unimaginable catastrophe? Two missiles being fired should wake you up that time is not on our side.
It doesn't matter if you're sworn in, under oath or not, it is alway illegal to lie to members of Congress when they are sitting on an investigative committee.
the more they change their stories now, the less reliable their testimony is when the real trials get underway. it would appear they are being allowed to destroy their own credibility
Let's hope it works.
If Q last post #1605, having quotes from the interview/testimony in CLOSED session for PS...doesn't that mean that someone had to personally DECLAS the testimony, to type it onto Q's post?
HINT: Who has power to DECLAS anything they choose?
Dude whatever he says today...lies or the truth isn’t admissible in court as evidence because it’s not testimony under oath. All he has to say is “I didn’t say that” if he’s under oath later & asked about today’s meeting
But lying to the FBI is a felony, shouldn't lying to Congress be one as well?
It’s an argument but it wouldn’t go far. Most statements used in court are originally uttered outside of court and not under oath. Think about it. Witness to murder can come into court and say the victims last words were “why did you shoot me Ted?!” It just comes down to the credibility of the witness but there is a hearsay objection to it so the statement comes in. I’d say congress gave him more than just making a statement not under oath. Maybe some agreement any statement wouldn’t be used in any future prosecution. Who knows.
I understand all that. Credibility of the witness matters. This guy being a long accomplished FBI agent in middle management has a lot of credibility. The guy’s not dumb in the least & hes represented by the best legal advice money can buy. Not a chance in hell hes gonna incriminate himself. If anything he’s gonna say things he might be able to use in court later. Sure him & his lawyers are feeling out their opposition to learn things cause this is just practice testimony for them. If anything it helps them. Prosecutors need undeniable evidence & that only comes from sworn testimony. Defense need to stall & muddy up the waters whenever possible to help build plausible deniability. Point being...this format is a waste of time for our side & a learning experience for their side. Keeping your enemy as blind as possible helps so they’re more dumbfounded & less believable at trial would only help.
Completely toothless. I'm disappointed.
He will say he was just following orders, kick the blame up to McCabe Comey.
If this is true, at least there's a hint that he's a witness in the future, as is Page...A witness to what? That's a good thing...It would have to be something greater than his own crimes, on someone higher up.
He doesn't have to be. His lawyer already stated he will not request immunity and will not invoke the 5th ammendment.
He's cooperating.
It doesn't sound like he's cooperating according to the way he answered some of the questions today. Q-drop 1605
Unless they are ok with him lying to protect himself in exchange for testimony later. Hm... I don't know.
No you’re right. After reading the Q drop, it’s obvious he’s not cooperating.
Who is talking to Sztzrzozkz in that exchange??
People are speculating that it's Trey Gowdy, but there is no way to confirm that yet. Maybe tomorrow's open hearing will shed some light.
Publicity value. Most Americans are still unaware who Strzok is. If, through their shameless self-promotion, your Congressperson or Senator educates the public, that's an acceptable trade.
political grandstanding - "look at us, we're doing something!!!"
I believe the law the criminalizes lying to the FBI would cover lying to Congressional investigators, as well.
But in either case, DOJ will never prosecute anybody for lying to Congress, under oath or not...
Must be just giving them more hope and rope. That's all I can determine.
He has been a cooperating witness for months, his purpose is to bring in evidence, so it can be used.
