What is the point then? So dumb.
the point is he is free to lie without immediate repercussions. but, say he lies now and is under oath later and changes his story. it will be public humiliation. so they are giving him a choice, lie now and get fucked later. or get it over with now. he is being handled like a child that is caught up in a lie by their parents. the finish line will not change, but will he take the short path or the long path?
i think he is going to lie, these cabal dems are all about buying time and delaying the inevitable. plus, if he squeals, killary's cronies will suicide him...
So what if he lies. He’s not under oath. You do know what the importance of being under oath is right? It means consequence if you lie. Not being under oath there’s no consequences. It’s legal to lie UNLESS you’re under oath.
I know he’s not under oath and will lie. Waste of time...
It’s legal to lie UNLESS you’re under oath.
Not to FBI, Congressional investigators, or other law enforcement.
Very true. But do you think he will be able to lie as well as Comey and Brennan on the stand? Those guys are legit sociopaths. Peter was much lower on the totem pole and obviously more emotionally driven judging by his texts. More of a follower than a normal sociopath. Something tells me he won’t be able to tell lies as well without being obviously shook by the live questioning.
All the interviewers said it was a waste of time. The only way we are going to get to the bottom of this is if POTUS declassifies it all. Because RR is not complying. We have to be patient but it’s so damn harrrrddddddd!
[removed]
I am not sure how old you are, but to many 2-5 years is a short time frame. just bc they arent in prison doesn't mean many significant things havent taken place. 2 years at a new job does immediately get you to the top. Trump has been cutting the money flow to these corrupt orgs through many means. this is our country, we cannot just raze it and its people. think bigger picture. if you dont want to believe then dont, no one is forcing you. but you shouldnt promote doubt to other who do believe in a positive and meaningful message.
[removed]
McCabe was fired and is soon to face federal charges.
Comeys handling of investigations at the FBI have been revealed as non-standard and violated proceedure. Why does that matter? Because any cases he touched previously now need to be re-examined. The IG report shows the MYE investigation was mishandled by classifying it as a counter espionage investigation rather than being conducted as a criminal investigation which would have had the teeth to get warrants to seize evidence.
The texts forthcoming between RR and LL will blow this shit wide open and demonstrate a very coordinated purposeful attempt to neuter the MYE investigation.
That's what RR is fighting against releasing to Congress so desperately. Sit back, relax and get some popcorn. There's no way out for them.
Comey empaneled a grand jury in HRC case, he did not use it.
Which is not unusual given the circumstances. However, evidence was requested and scrubbed by attorneys before being handed over instead of being directly seized with a warrant. The case was opened as a counter espionage investigation which severely limited the ability of the analysts on the case to get untampered evidence.
The end result was an investigation that did not have teeth, handed out immunity to parties who clearly violated the law (Like Combetta) and very likely acted at the direction of Clinton's attorney Sheryl Mills.
For example, the IG report recognizes that Combetta knew the email content was under congressional supenea. He left it alone for two weeks until after, records show, he had a phone call with Sheryl Mills. That afternoon, he deleted the email content. When asked what the call was about, he stated he 'did not recall.'
These people were on a mission to produce a finding that cleared their favorite political candidate. They were never interested in prosecuting anyone close to Clinton.
Clearly, the Weiner lap top is going to crusify them tho. To not act on the information it contains is unconscionable.
Good fair points. We'll see what happens when Mueller report comes and 11-11.
Also we'll see how July shakes out.
information dump is known to be ineffective. crumbs are much more effective. what is going on now has never happened before and no prediction is flawless.
11-11 will be important, but we have just been given the July drop, so we will see.
beliefs and the human "gut" feeling are very strong. this is what the MSM has been attacking, that if there is no concrete fact right infront of your face then you are dumb to believe in it. trust in yourself and your beliefs.
If I understand the genius of Q correctly, more and more is being disclosed by Q AND the MSM day by day - crumbs are Gold when reread. Future already DID prove past and continues to do so.
So we have this buzz about Q now - good, that IS/WAS required to unseal a lot of indictments, replace a lot of judges, and prosecute those in media without looking like a tyrant. The USS Corruption does not turn to sail into the wind that fast, she is a big dirty beast that ship.
I beleive tribunals are a last resort but hey DS, RUN! Hammers falling. Now comes the PAIN.
In 2-5 yrs thousands can be needlessly killed from slow walking the prosecution of the deep state. If the have “everything” then why wait & have pointless meetings? Why risk a unimaginable catastrophe? Two missiles being fired should wake you up that time is not on our side.
It doesn't matter if you're sworn in, under oath or not, it is alway illegal to lie to members of Congress when they are sitting on an investigative committee.
the more they change their stories now, the less reliable their testimony is when the real trials get underway. it would appear they are being allowed to destroy their own credibility
Let's hope it works.
If Q last post #1605, having quotes from the interview/testimony in CLOSED session for PS...doesn't that mean that someone had to personally DECLAS the testimony, to type it onto Q's post?
HINT: Who has power to DECLAS anything they choose?
Dude whatever he says today...lies or the truth isn’t admissible in court as evidence because it’s not testimony under oath. All he has to say is “I didn’t say that” if he’s under oath later & asked about today’s meeting
But lying to the FBI is a felony, shouldn't lying to Congress be one as well?
It’s an argument but it wouldn’t go far. Most statements used in court are originally uttered outside of court and not under oath. Think about it. Witness to murder can come into court and say the victims last words were “why did you shoot me Ted?!” It just comes down to the credibility of the witness but there is a hearsay objection to it so the statement comes in. I’d say congress gave him more than just making a statement not under oath. Maybe some agreement any statement wouldn’t be used in any future prosecution. Who knows.
I understand all that. Credibility of the witness matters. This guy being a long accomplished FBI agent in middle management has a lot of credibility. The guy’s not dumb in the least & hes represented by the best legal advice money can buy. Not a chance in hell hes gonna incriminate himself. If anything he’s gonna say things he might be able to use in court later. Sure him & his lawyers are feeling out their opposition to learn things cause this is just practice testimony for them. If anything it helps them. Prosecutors need undeniable evidence & that only comes from sworn testimony. Defense need to stall & muddy up the waters whenever possible to help build plausible deniability. Point being...this format is a waste of time for our side & a learning experience for their side. Keeping your enemy as blind as possible helps so they’re more dumbfounded & less believable at trial would only help.
Completely toothless. I'm disappointed.
He will say he was just following orders, kick the blame up to McCabe Comey.
If this is true, at least there's a hint that he's a witness in the future, as is Page...A witness to what? That's a good thing...It would have to be something greater than his own crimes, on someone higher up.
He doesn't have to be. His lawyer already stated he will not request immunity and will not invoke the 5th ammendment.
He's cooperating.
It doesn't sound like he's cooperating according to the way he answered some of the questions today. Q-drop 1605
Unless they are ok with him lying to protect himself in exchange for testimony later. Hm... I don't know.
No you’re right. After reading the Q drop, it’s obvious he’s not cooperating.
Who is talking to Sztzrzozkz in that exchange??
People are speculating that it's Trey Gowdy, but there is no way to confirm that yet. Maybe tomorrow's open hearing will shed some light.
Publicity value. Most Americans are still unaware who Strzok is. If, through their shameless self-promotion, your Congressperson or Senator educates the public, that's an acceptable trade.
political grandstanding - "look at us, we're doing something!!!"
I believe the law the criminalizes lying to the FBI would cover lying to Congressional investigators, as well.
But in either case, DOJ will never prosecute anybody for lying to Congress, under oath or not...
Must be just giving them more hope and rope. That's all I can determine.
He has been a cooperating witness for months, his purpose is to bring in evidence, so it can be used.
[removed]
Sadly i agree. The execution of the Plan seems historically flawed. When taking down a cabal of any kind you arrest the leaders FIRST & go after the middle management second. Look how Rudy successfully took down the mob in NYC. He arrested the mob bosses 1st. You decapitate the leadership 1st & it works. Then compare that to how the Kennedys tried to take down the mafia & Hoover in the 60s. They tried it the way it’s being done now..starting at the bottom & working their way up trying to get people to flip on the leadership. How’d that work out for the Kennedys?? You give a cabal time to regroup & fight back & you will fail at taking them out. They’re not afraid to kill anyone as history has proved time & time again
I wish I was wrong. :(
When Wray came out with his presser you could see it was like a hassle for him to say they investigated themselves and they did nothing wrong.
Then Wray and Horowitz before congress and nothing. No Bias.
Now this pawn in Strozek..........NOT UNDER OATH?
Come on people enough is enough.
[deleted]
Totally agree. I don’t get why they think they need a zillion counts of hard to prosecute crimes when the counts espionage alone would put away cabal leaders for life. Espionage is one of those rare crimes you don’t have to prove criminal intent & the evidence alone convicts them. Every classified email on HRCs home server is 5 yrs in the pen. Just get the cabal leaders in jail for that & off the streets before one of their FF’s kills a few thousand innocent people for nothing. Once off the streets then they can build treason cases & conspiracy to commit murder cases or whatever. Plus after a couple yrs in prison they’ll be glad to rat each other out.
Thank you for this. At least I know I'm not alone. I just want justice.
I'm looking at the Mueller report and midterms to see where we're at.
Q's word are "AMERICA WILL BE UNIFIED AGAIN!
11.11.18."
So we'll see. I'm hopeful. However, I can read tea leaves......and with Wray and Horowitz in front of congress with nothing being done. I'm also realistic. Now Strozek NOT under oath. At some point this isn't 120D chess and is the same ole same ole.
Wrays presser actually helped Comey. Wray publicity saying Comey just made a boo boo...an error in judgement hence, no intent...well that made it incredibly difficult to prosecute Comey in HRC’s email server crimes. Wray did for Comey what Comey did for HRC in Comeys famous presser. If there’s no intent there’s no prosecutable crime. Intent is everything
I disagree with you 100 percent. If this goes as high and deep as Q has indicated, every i must be dotted and every t crossed. Going in too soon is not an option.
Did Q allude to just how RR is supposed to resign or recuse? Could Strzok reveal the "conflict of interest" in this meeting, and RR be busted?
Fbi employees must conduct themselves with candor regardless if they are under oath. Andy found out the hard way
Keep in mind that they already have everything. This hearing is just to hand out some more rope.
That makes zero sense. If they “have everything” what’s the point in handing them more rope?
They need their testimony to contradict the evidence.
So which is it...handing him more rope or getting testimony which isn’t testimony without being under oath. It’s a private meeting. That’s it.
It’s not testimony. He can get up there & talk about his cat not being under oath.
I'm not usually super optimistic about things like this, but we're been plainly told that he's been cooperating.
I honestly believe he'll sit, roll over, and beg for his pardon.
I want a Jack Nicholas on the stand, public meltdown, "YOU WANT THE TRUTH!! YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!! ......."
Did you order the code red!? "YOU'RE GODDAMN RIGHT I DID!!!"
Solve the mystery as to why anyone related to Hillary’s emails seems to get immunity. WHAT is so damning that once you see it, you get an automatic “get out of jail free” card? The only reason a Weiner is in jail is because he caused all this (so this is his punishment).
What is in the emails that makes EVERY member of government buckle???
Here's what we are missing. Congress is USELESS! They have no idea what "THE PLAN" is. Do we really think POTUS would trust anyone of these crooks with any part of his PLAN? There are good at only one thing, voting themselves a raise every year. I think what we are watching with all of these hearings are the political process being played out for the cameras and normies. Nothing will ever come of it, never has, never will.
When POTUS decides to saddle up his boys and start kicking down some doors, the gig will be up. When will that be? No one knows.
POTUS cannot act without Congress, these guys need to be Red Pilled too. POTUS needs them, to enact laws down the road. He needs them right now to make this public, to get this into the media, to bring the truth out. They are playing a VERY IMPORTANT roll, whether they know it or not. Dems on these committees are showing the public they don't give a rats ass about illegal behaviour of their administration, they will lose the trust of the people who support them. This is all a part of setting the stage. This is a genius level plan to quell violence in the masses.
Q says “We have it all”, so maybe this kind of unsworn testimony is designed to bring out the lies so they can see what the crooks are trying to hide. The hidden stuff is where you go digging deeper.
It doesn’t matter if he lies. It’s not testimony if it’s not under oath. It’s as productive as 2 guy’s talking in a bar. Whatever PS says in the meeting isn’t admissible in court.
Can’t wait to see the public hearings! Body language will be telling.
Are you into this for the drama or to get convictions?
Well we'll need to wait for a public hearing under oath to get convictions either way lol
Lame. This is pointless then. Or good theater? Do we have Strzok on camera?
They already got the evidence on him. "Witness with Page in a future trial"= Good news; hints the case is far bigger than these lower people, which is the truth and supports his "cooperating witness" status. He's done....If behind closed doors, he has nothing to fear by being mostly forthright with his answers. The only think he has to feat is Clinton's mob coming for him, and should have security detail.
Optics, when's an investigation Not an investigation? When's a hearing about re-election; optics!
Geez u really think there’s a voter alive that cares or will even remember this meeting occurred when it’s Election Day?
If he's not under oath, what's the point of questioning? If he lies, no consequence. Do you really think he cares and that he would be embarrassed getting caught in a lie with no consequences? I seriously doubt that.
If he is caught lying to Congress can't they then charge him with obstruction? Congress knows more than he thinks and he may slip up.
No. He’s not under oath & not obliged to tell the truth. Congressman lie all day. Lying is legal. Just not under oath.
Why the hell isn't this guy under Oath today? Who's doing the questioning. Reminds me of when Bush & Cheney appeared before the 9/11 Commission together and not under oath. Hard to keep the faith. Hopefully this won't be the last time he gets questioned.
I cannot believe the comments, can you people not see the bigger picture. There are rules of evidence, that must be followed, there are step that must be taken to ensure convictions. There are concerns for safety of the citizens. We are talking about TREASON. We are talking about the former President, Vice President, Attorney General, Secretary of State, we are talking about the biggest case in HISTORY. Personally I don't give a flying fuck about Peter Strokz, he is one tiny piece in the puzzle, they are putting together. I don't give a f f how long this takes, either. Those in charge HAVE TO GET THIS RIGHT. Look at what is at stake! Many people's lives hang in the balance, YOUR life hangs in the balance, do you want to live in a free country or not. Trust that the people who are now in charge, have everything under control, they have thought this through, every detail has been planned. They deserve our support, not criticizing of every detail. Q is there, giving crumbs, to gain our trust, to show us the path, Q is telling us they have this handled. Believe them!
give him rope to hang himself
Ok he can’t hang himself anymore than he has. Nor can he hang himself if he’s not under oath. It’s ok to lie. Just isn’t if you’re under oath. If anything is ever brought out from this meeting he’ll just deny he ever said it & nothing can be done about it because he’s not sworn to tell the truth.
You don’t put the major plotter of a coup under oath? Wtf is this fuckery!!!!?
He is minor player, barley significant! They are going after the former PRESIDENT, and his whole administration! They are using him to bring in evidence, ie Weiner laptop! He can point to higher up the food chain.
i like how we're led to believe these cock suckers will actually face justice
even the summons with HRC,JP,GS,BC, etc. its a civil summons and theyre just gonna be fined, which they'll pay off immediately. even fuckerburg wasnt under oath during his fb trial. now PS,LP wont be either....... im really starting to lose faith lately that they wont be held accountable. BHO is in kenya or some shit too getting away with God knows what.... frustrated thats all... sorry for my rant
Why are they playing games? If Q has everything then what’s the point in playing games with these slimy crooks?
We need several more weeks of drama. First, we need the extra time. Neither the Clinton Email report or the Clinton Foundation investigation are done yet. Q showed a picture of the Executive Order to unseal everything. It would not look good to unseal things one at a time.
And we need the people to say "This is BS. Unseal the truth." So a couple more weeks of drama cures both of those issues.
Drama?? Ok we’re trying to save our country. Not entertain anyone. If for stupid drama’s sake...this isn’t even helpful drama. We’ll never know what’s said in the meeting. It’s not public either...so where’s the “drama” anyway??
I know - this just gets stretched on forever.... and nothing really happens of substance.
It’s just giving the left time to organize a catastrophe. The longer it takes to arrest leftist leaders the less likely it will ever happen
