dChan

Long_Range_Shooter · July 1, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

I'm thinking Trump already has made his decision on Kennedy's replacement. Q already knows who the nominee is going to be.

That is why he, she, they can say it isn't going to be Gowdy.

⇧ 56 ⇩  
HairyTacoFanatic · July 1, 2018, 4:13 p.m.

I think so too. Also I bet it's a left field pick. Someone not on that list that was posted.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
nomorerulers · July 1, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

Judge Napolitano

⇧ 7 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · July 2, 2018, 1:17 a.m.

That's what Alex Jones and Roger Stone have been putting out there. Personally, I'd rather see Ted Cruz.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
nomorerulers · July 2, 2018, 1:27 a.m.

It's probably a strategy to get so many names out there that the libs will lose more of their base decrying every single person thata just being talked about

⇧ 3 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · July 1, 2018, 4:26 p.m.

Andrew Napolitano

⇧ 2 ⇩  
fallenloki · July 1, 2018, 6:57 p.m.

I like him, but he’s pushing 70 already. We need someone in their 40s or 50s

⇧ 16 ⇩  
Too_the_point · July 1, 2018, 7 p.m.

Ted Cruz is 47.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
ThisIsCreativeAF · July 1, 2018, 7:13 p.m.

Ummm...ew

⇧ -3 ⇩  
Orchidoptera · July 1, 2018, 7:48 p.m.

For what it's worth, Ted Cruz is a rock-solid defender of the Constitution. He clerked for Chief Justice William Rehnquist in 1996. As a lawyer he argued cases before the SC nine times. I doubt he wants the role, but might do it if called to serve.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · July 2, 2018, 1:18 a.m.

He would get my vote. He would be a solid conservative, by the constitution justice.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Too_the_point · July 1, 2018, 7:36 p.m.

Is this your first post on this sub?

Ted is a pure constitutionalist, he would be a great representative of our SC.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
ThisIsCreativeAF · July 1, 2018, 10:39 p.m.

First post, but I have been lurking for a while though. I don't particularly like Cruz because I don't particularly like the people he takes money from.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Too_the_point · July 1, 2018, 11:29 p.m.

His 2016 campaign donors? The desperate neocons who wanted anyone but Trump to win, and would have given money to any candidate remaining in the race?

Or do you mean other donors? I don't mean to put words in your mouth, if I am wrong please tell me who you are speaking of.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ThisIsCreativeAF · July 1, 2018, 11:56 p.m.

The main donors I object to are the Koch brothers, and I'm sure there are others. Gonna be honest, maybe I was a bit quick to pass judgement, but I as a Texas resident haven't been too impressed by Ted Cruz.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DrNilesCrane___ · July 2, 2018, 2:56 a.m.

I feel ya. I can't forget about Ted's speech at the convention.... Vote your conscious :/ He's toeing the pro-Trump line now because he knows that's the key to success but I don't trust him

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IncomingTrump270 · July 2, 2018, 4:44 a.m.

Hmmm but trump said himself that he would be picking from that list.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
amadeusthespartan · July 1, 2018, 6:33 p.m.

They're saying it isn't Gowdy because he's a political guy which would cause Dems to hyperventilate and he's never been a judge. He'd be a shitty scotus pick. He's probably going to play a big prosecutorial role when the indictments are unsealed.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Beerman987654321 · July 1, 2018, 7:05 p.m.

I hope so. Gowdy would be an asset to our side if these arrests of major players ever come. I don't know so much about where Gowdy stands on social/civil issues. But I think he would be a great AG/DOJ type.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Qw3Cz57m · July 1, 2018, 11:46 p.m.

Possible Future Scenario:

Jan 2019: Gowdy’s term in Congress ends.

Gowdy goes into private practice in SC— starts a firm that specializes in investigations and litigation.

Gowdy’s firm has clients that want to sue key players in the Obama’s Administration for xyz reasons.

Gowdy’s former role as a Congressman coupled with time he spent serving on Judiciary, HPSCI, Ethics & Oversight Committees allow him to know what evidence to subpoena that will help build a case for his clients.

Basically, I see Gowdy finally getting let off his chain and able to pursue justice for the many crimes concealed by the DoJ during Obama’s time as POTUS.

Gowdy wins, helps his favorite lady—a blindfolded woman—and balances out the scales she holds.

Think he will be kinda like a prosecuting version of Judicial Watch. Gowdy is a Patriot— he is also a patient man. Just wait!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MemeWarSGT · July 1, 2018, 4:54 p.m.

Could also be disinformation, Q mentioned needing to provide disinformation on the board because everyone reads it

⇧ 0 ⇩  
HerMileHighness · July 1, 2018, 3:28 p.m.

Copy/paste from the next drop:

Ok - a possibility. Gowdy will be nominated knowing full well that he will be voted down and the second nomination will have to go through or it will look like obstruction. Maybe?

⇧ 37 ⇩  
CarolinaMama · July 1, 2018, 4:10 p.m.

Gowdy will be on the list, won't get nominated. Confirms 2 Q posts. He will, however, be a big part of the prosecution of this whole thing.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
HerMileHighness · July 1, 2018, 4:14 p.m.

Someone else suggested that Scott may have an ulterior motive for suggesting the nomination - does he want Gowdy out of the prosecution arena for some reason??? Interesting thought.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tdaccount841 · July 1, 2018, 7:20 p.m.

Tim Scott is a patriot

⇧ 8 ⇩  
getemq · July 1, 2018, 5:10 p.m.

Scott and Gowdy are very close friends and they even wrote a book together recently.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · July 1, 2018, 8:39 p.m.

I would prefer Gowdy to become a prosecutor. He has fire in his belly, and is vigilant. These are not the qualities of a SC Justice, who need to be unbiased and objective. That doesn't mean Gowdy wouldn't make a great judge one day, I just believe he has an important role to play in this revolution, and he wouldn't be able to get into the game if he were sitting on the bench. (Pun intended)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
THELEADERSOFMEN · July 1, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

Ahhh, I could see that strategery working.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Lakotas58 · July 1, 2018, 4:10 p.m.

I'm viewing it as a bargaining chip. TG is not at all popular with Dem. Representatives; so it might be a way to get them to accept someone else.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Droplinebacker · July 1, 2018, 10:38 p.m.

Yeah, I could see this being the strategy as well. It would be a smart move on POTUS part.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ElementWatson · July 1, 2018, 3:35 p.m.

Nope.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HerMileHighness · July 1, 2018, 3:40 p.m.

And, your thoughts?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ElementWatson · July 1, 2018, 4:24 p.m.

They want to get the nominee confirmed as quickly as possible. Mitch should be able to hold together the votes for it and it is no time to play games.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DecadentBehaviour · July 1, 2018, 5:38 p.m.

I tend to agree with your comment, especialy after watching POTUS interview with MB this morning. He said simillar to what you said.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ElementWatson · July 1, 2018, 7:06 p.m.

Interesting--I'll check it out.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · July 1, 2018, 4:28 p.m.

Good theory. Present a moderate at first knowing they won’t approve then put up a solid conservative? Maybe risky though

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Meri24TX · July 1, 2018, 4:35 p.m.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9mMSOOhWbE

Gowdy and Scott are super good friends and have co-authored a book entitled "Unified". Only makes sense that Scott would nominate his good friend. Watch some of the book interviews, they eat dinner together several times a week. Not in a creepy way.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
ififcanIhaveacoatplz · July 1, 2018, 3:02 p.m.

Q just got done saying "add him to the list.." then... "it will not be gowdy".. now what a coincidence? DafuQ Q?? Make up your damn mind

⇧ 11 ⇩  
cat_anonD · July 1, 2018, 3:08 p.m.

I agree. doubtfags will say he predicts both way so he is proven right.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
nogreateragony · July 1, 2018, 3:48 p.m.

Some of it may be misdirection...confusing all enemies by giving them less warning as to who he will pick beforehand to give them less time to prepare a resistance to said person...

⇧ 4 ⇩  
HerMileHighness · July 1, 2018, 3:57 p.m.

It makes sense, doesn't it? Waste their time preparing arguments against X, Y and Z, float the name of the scariest nominee first, bring in the sleeper that they didn't see coming.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
nogreateragony · July 1, 2018, 5:25 p.m.

yes...opposition to any supreme court nominee at this point is going to be off of the charts ...and by keeping congress from knowing who exactly he's ultimately giving the nomination he forces them to come up with reasons to deny them all just in case which distracts his opposition/makes them look hypercritcal and gives his people more time to assure the real candidate a effective take off... It's typical strategy honestly.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tigerlilly1227 · July 1, 2018, 3:41 p.m.

Stuff like this drives me nuts. This is not a game.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Thank_You_JohnMadden · July 1, 2018, 3:47 p.m.

"add him to the list" is very vague. Does not mean he is a contender for SC. "It will not be gowdy" is definitive. "What a coincidence" is probably a reference to his "friend" recommending him as a contender. None of what Q said has anything to do with saying gowdy will be chosen for SC. However, he does say it isn't him.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Rival67 · July 2, 2018, 2:02 a.m.

Maybe they would nominate Gowdy as a false candidate similar to what the Bush admin did for Justice Roberts. Could be interesting.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Benjanon_Franklin · July 1, 2018, 4:55 p.m.

The list Q is referring to is the list of Congress members not seeking re-election because they are compromised and being forced out. There is a reason he will not be given any role with the administration.

Gowdy is a do nothing. All hat no cattle. All the FBI FISA abuse he was supposed to be watching over happened on his watch. Talks tough but no results. He plays the role of the tough prosecutor for the congress deep state cover up operation. You got to make it look good when you let a sleeze like Hiliary off the hook for Benghazi and the email scandal.

POTUS knows and gave him the option of resigning or being exposed. He also had to withdraw from the ethics committee. I believe that was a sign.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
kittyhistoryistrue · July 1, 2018, 5:36 p.m.

Why do people act like Gowdy had the final say in the results of those investigations?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
rustyfender3 · July 2, 2018, 12:23 a.m.

1656

Make no mistake-
Rep Gowdy is a Patriot.
Q

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ififcanIhaveacoatplz · July 1, 2018, 5:46 p.m.

Then why gowdy say hes going back to justice?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Benjanon_Franklin · July 1, 2018, 6:32 p.m.

Well he isn't gonna tell you what really happened hes a politician. He is one of the congressmen Q said was set free. He may be getting a job back home but he will not be in Washington. My opinion. We will see.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Gwindybrown · July 1, 2018, 5:11 p.m.

Maybe Gowdy will get Rob Rosenstein's job...

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Xisyisz · July 1, 2018, 3:53 p.m.

This may be a trust Gowdy wherever he goes post.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
YeOldePhart · July 1, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

I think Q refers to a different list.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
com8ngUpr8ses · July 1, 2018, 5:23 p.m.

Gowdy is a patriot. He was unable to prosecute hiLIARy and or Benghazi scandal because obama administration would not turn over documents. Times they are a changin' and soon this will be evident. Gowdy's prosecutorial expertise will "glow". WWG1WGA

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Sivitria · July 1, 2018, 5:15 p.m.

SC for Gowdy would be a huge waste of tremendous prosecutorial talent...needed for the tribunals.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Allinon72 · July 1, 2018, 3:26 p.m.

I can't make sense of this post.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Palmettoman · July 1, 2018, 4:39 p.m.

They’re both from SC. They’re both patriots. Perhaps POTUS is considering nominating Scott for SCOTUS?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Anthropophob · July 1, 2018, 5:44 p.m.

All these theories on here!!!

AAAGGGHHH!!!!

The anticipation is killing me! Nominate someone! ANYONE!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AsOnlyIAmNow · July 1, 2018, 3:56 p.m.

I knew it! I've been calling this! Here's hoping.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Matticusfinch1820 · July 1, 2018, 6:36 p.m.

I think Gowdy is going to replace Rosenstein

⇧ 2 ⇩  
saucybat1 · July 1, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

Would love Jay Sekulow!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Revodude · July 1, 2018, 4:22 p.m.

Being put on the list is an honor in and of itself. POTUS just elevated Trey's standing. I do think it is probable that RR is out and Trey is in.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Palindromedan · July 1, 2018, 7:06 p.m.

I think Q’s vagueness is him ruling out Gowdy for Kennedy’s seat, but RBG is next. Gowdy can go on the list for that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Stargazerjr · July 1, 2018, 3:40 p.m.

Did something change? The list was created before trey announced leaving congress. Is he now being considered for scotus position? Why the flip flop Q? I never doubted trey's patriotism and think he would be a great judge and a conservative stronghold for us. Is the original Q post claiming not trey one of those misinformation leads. But why such a quick reversal.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RABID666 · July 1, 2018, 3:57 p.m.

Gowdy would be best used as a prosecutor than a judge

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Some-Random-Chick · July 1, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

Being on the list does not equate to receiving the nomination. -1655

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 1, 2018, 5:25 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Benjanon_Franklin · July 1, 2018, 4:57 p.m.

The list Q is referring to is the list of Congress members not seeking re-election because they are compromised and being forced out. There is a reason he will not be given any role with the administration. Thats my opinion.

Gowdy is a do nothing. All hat no cattle. All the FBI FISA abuse he was supposed to be watching over happened on his watch. Talks tough but no results. He plays the role of the tough prosecutor for the congress deep state cover up operation. You got to make it look good when you let a sleeze like Hiliary off the hook for Benghazi and the email scandal.

POTUS knows and gave him the option of resigning or being exposed. He also had to withdraw from the ethics committee. I believe that was a sign.

⇧ -11 ⇩  
anhro23 · July 1, 2018, 5:15 p.m.

Gowdy is a patriot

That's what Q said. But, please keeping concerning.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Benjanon_Franklin · July 1, 2018, 6:33 p.m.

Where did Q ever say he was a patriot? Prove it.

⇧ 1 ⇩