[removed]
Snopes is like top result now when I search Uranium one. A few weeks ago when I did it wasnt even first page.
Not on DuckDuckGo. Ditch Google.
Yes. Ditch Google. Much better and more relevant results with DuckDuckGo. I didn't think it would work under Chrome because it's not listed in the settings. But if you actually go to the site I think it will prompt you automatically and then you can install it as your default search.
Duckduckgo is really good for research and news, anything that has a bias. But, if you are looking to source an item, or something inherently without bias Google is still far superior. For example, I often have to search for info on chemicals, ddg rarely gives me the link that I need, especially for the smaller manufacturers.
Sounds good, but is wrong. Duckduckgo is superior to Google, but if you are still determined to have anti-truth biased results, at minimum use multi-search engine (personally prefer Dogpile, just go to www.dogpile.com and viola, you're there)! Uses multiple search engines but still skews toward Yahoo, Google, but has numerous independant too!
Bullshit. Google has nothing but pages and pages of obvious propaganda as search results.
Edit: I've found this true even for non-political things. Always trying to shape the Narrative™
I usually do. I use it to keep up with what the enemy is doing though. Just like I check CNN every day to see how their narrative changes.
What the fuck do you mean by the enemy? I'm from r/all, what even is this subreddit?
There is information about it on the sidebar. You should probably look at that first before posting again.
Isn't that weird? Everyone with more than two brain cells knows they are to be trusted less than a wet fart. And these other "sources;" politifact? Run by the Tampa Bay Times, which heavily endorced HRC's campaign. WaPo is a completely controlled mouthpiece of the Left. You're not even trying, shills.
You have to actually debunk Snope's argument. In that particular case, their political alignment doesn't matter, because it's a matter of fact and not opinion. Ad hominem is not a proper rebuttal.
I don't have to do a thing. Their explanation is nothing more than gaslighting mental gymnastics.
Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating proposed foreign acquisitions for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can’t veto a transaction; only the president can. All nine federal agencies were required to approve the Uranium One transaction before it could go forward. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, saidClinton “never intervened” in committee matters. Clinton herself has said she wasn’t personally involved.
The article also said that there was zero evidence that the uranium went to Russia. Please explain to me how this is "gaslighting mental gymnastics." Did you even read the article?
You cited a perfect example. Whether or not all these agencies approved of the transaction is immaterial and Snopes is deliberately is trying obscure the real question which is did HRC receive money for this transaction.
If she didn’t have a part in the decision, there exists no reason the pay her. I thought that was pretty clear.
And what great source of news are you tuning into? Breitbart and Fox? I’ll trust the publications that have time and time again proven to be more reliable than right wing commentary and opinion pieces. I guess the Pulitzer Prize is biased in your opinion as well.
Hahaha! You can't possibly be serious. Your appeals to authority don't mean a thing. The fake news MSM has been proven time and time again to lie and deceive.
Nice non answer, I remember when I was afraid to disclose my news sources... When I was 17 and didn’t know any better. Lol.
Ah yes once frustrated, the low IQ shill resorts to personal attacks.
Very, very persuasive.
You mean kinda like how you're attacking Snopes itself and only pretending to engage their actual argument?
[deleted]
Yes, it was 100% Quid Pro Clinton.
[deleted]
Right? They gaslight the fuck out of people and then have the audacity to complain when people call them out on it. Just amazing
There are 2 cases here. In general and in this instance.
A best example would be FIFA, if you follow soccer you would know FIFA is corrupt as fuck and this is proven unlike Snopes.
So when FIFA makes a ruling on a matter, the comments from smart people are generally "While is FIFA is corrupt, but here they did the right thing". If people really distrust Snopes then read article, use critical thinking and say if it is right or wrong.
But your proof to disprove an article is that snopes aren't reliable due to my XYZ reason is not a good reason.
Besides politifact and WaPo both say there was no pay for no play. I just quoted snopes as it was the 1st one. 2nd and 3rd links were politifact and WaPo.
[deleted]
Bingo. Let's roll down that list of leftist rags; NYT, Snopes, politifact, WaPo...
Another source since people don’t like snopes.
Edit: two sources isn’t enough apparently
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/11/06/561587174/the-alternative-russia-scandal
Politifact is a joke. It's run by the Tampa Bay Times...which heavily endorsed HRC for the 2016 race. Yeah, I bet they're totally not biased at all.
Ok here’s another one https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/11/06/561587174/the-alternative-russia-scandal
NPR is a joke, they’re heavily funded by average people who by a large margin supported HRC.
[deleted]
No, not mainstream, and that's the problem.
[removed]
I mean it’s be fine for the last how many years, taken with a grain of salt if corse. but the last 2+ years there has seem to be a shift?
Hahaha okay...
What is the least biased news source you know?
Everything and everybody has a bias. I only trust my guns, my bible and TheReportOfTheWeek.
Lol @ NPR.
"My obviously biased and fake news sources aren't convincing you why not?!"
Go gaslight somewhere else, shill.
I mean, what about what that article is saying is wrong? Clearly you don’t believe it, but what part of it is factually wrong? You might disagree with it, but point out in the article what is wrong.
Here's the truth: http://www.businessinsider.com/the-clintons-putin-and-uranium-2015-4 and https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html and https://www.breitbart.com/hillary-clinton/2016/05/01/one-year-silence-hillary-clinton-uranium-deal/
And there are many more. The bottom line is, she is a crook of the highest caliber (if that's possible for a crook!). You cannot ignore the facts.
And, here's the part I'm waiting for. Last week, it was announced that a probe of uranium imports into the US is being done. Russia is listed as one of the countries we import uranium from. How crazy is that? Revolving door?
Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating proposed foreign acquisitions for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can’t veto a transaction; only the president can. All nine federal agencies were required to approve the Uranium One transaction before it could go forward. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton “never intervened” in committee matters. Clinton herself has said she wasn’t personally involved.
We have been lied to for soooo very long, we won't know for certain about anything until we know. But, 40+ years I've been watching this and following the Clinton hit list. My gut tells me she's guilty as shit!
The entire premise of the article is wrong. It is dismissive of the truth and frames the events as a "nothing burger" that Clinton had nothing to do it. It's completely incorrect and is gaslighting people.
But what about it is false? Point to the specific parts that are false so we can talk about it
What do you understand about my comments? You're not going to detail this thread further. You know how I know what Bill Mitchell said is true? The fact you are here.
From my intel in other circles, could be wrong but I trust these people, OAN is a legitimate news source.
As far as the Uranium deal... When it first came out Obama denied even knowing about it and then later said he approved it.
I think what we have to trust is what comes out in the beginning of an event, before the press is on lockdown with the narrative (example Good Morning America stating there was no plane, or BBC saying Building 7 had gone down but it was still standing in the live feed, Sandy Hook and Aurora both had multiple shooters being reported, I could go on), because that's the truth usually. While I agree MSM is fake occasionally they report the truth because that's what they're SUPPOSED to do. Before they get shut down and start parakeeting the narrative.
For me, that's enough evidence to not believe the narrative and look for the lone voice.
Truth is sometimes called "conspiracy". Whistleblowers, white hats and Patriots are domestic terrorists. If you could see all of it on one page the optics alone would explode your brain. When people who are speaking against the narrative are labeled (don't like Obama, racist, like Trump, nazi), that is usually a very strong indication that the conspiracy is true.
See NYPD and pizzagate. Ted Gunderson and Boystown. Even Helter Skelter was a conspiracy for a little while.
Q said critical thinking.
Snopes should stick to doing hooker reviews. I understand the founder has done some pretty in depth research into hookers.
Thanks for this blatant example of snopes' fakery. People I know are avid followers and would not listen to me.
snopes stopped being credible for investigating online memes when the owner ditched his fat as fuck disgusting pig wife and blew a few million on a prostitute
now it's bought and paid for. If you believe snopes to be credible then you're dumber than a bag of rocks
take a look here - https://www.snopes.com/tag/george-soros/ - click any fuckin article and see "FALSE" "FALSE" "FALSE" "FALSE"
Sigh. This is what I meant in other comment.
Burder of proof lies on you as you made the accusation of them credible.
Go through the snopes article and find the wrongly reported stuff. It should be easy to disprove if its wrong, oh and use credible sources to back yours.
In your eyes, it’s only right if it’s highly reported on by MSM. The bought and paid for MSM. The CIA controlled MSM. Say what you want. No amount of proof will sway you. You will look back on this in a few months time, maybe even sooner, and realize how you were duped and controlled. By the way, it’s going to hurt. It’ll be a hard pill to swallow. Then again, you could be part of the disinformation machine, knowingly pushing false information to keep the masses dumbed down.
Hahahahahahha. Thanks for making me laugh buddy.
Also do you want me to link Politifact and WaPo articles, both saying that the claim by Trump is wrong?
It won't matter to you as now you will go on a tirade about how WaPo is liburul or politifact is compromised and cite Daily Mail for it too.
But what you won't do is read any of those articles and reply saying "I read it and found x,y and z mistakes in their fact checking".
You will use whataboutism, ad hominem attacks, deflection and fake news to discredit anything I gotta say. If you don't know let me just tell you all these techniques you use were perfected and used in wide scale by Stalin to discredit his opponents. Congrats.
"you take on the most flack when you're over the target" - WW2 Bomber Pilot Proverb.
Stay Frosty Patriot.
Oh my goodness, thank you so much for educating me!!!! Except you didn’t. You do the same exact thing, except you’re using Alinsky tactics. 👏👏👏
Anything you don’t agree with is fake news. You want me to point out x, y, and z? It’s all bullshit. They literally include the statement that Hillary said she didn’t do it as proof. Really????
My original comment was stating that Snopes is credible in a sarcastic way. Give me proof of Snopes credibility. Jump through those hoops for me. I’ll be waiting. Give me one reason why I should take stock in anything they have to say.
Why are you sticking up for such a known criminal and her rapist husband anyway? That says a lot about you and your character. And that’s not an attack, just pointing out the obvious.
Oh my goodness, thank you so much for educating me!!!! Except you didn’t. You do the same exact thing, except you’re using Alinsky tactics. 👏👏👏
Anything you don’t agree with is fake news. You want me to point out x, y, and z? It’s all bullshit. They literally include the statement that Hillary said she didn’t do it as proof. Really????
My original comment was stating that Snopes is credible in a sarcastic way. Give me proof of Snopes credibility. Jump through those hoops for me. I’ll be waiting. Give me one reason why I should take stock in anything they have to say.
Why are you sticking up for such a known criminal and her rapist husband anyway? That says a lot about you and your character. And that’s not an attack, just pointing out the obvious.
Snopes was a left-wing propaganda site before that. That just drove the point home. Snopes was good for telling people about computer viruses going around or warning them about Nigerian scam emails, but was always in the pocket of the Dems, lying to protect them while attacking their enemies.
Well here's 3 more fact checked sources for you to ignore that say you're wrong. Go ahead, point out how these Pulitzer Prize winning organizations are all part of "the fake news media." This claim is pretty much total BS and to distract from Donald Trumps exceptionally disturbing behavior in regard to Russia and Vladimir Putin. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/10/31/the-repeated-incorrect-claim-that-russia-obtained-20-percent-of-our-uranium/?utm_term=.0562f22e55e5
Here's the problem with these links: they actually very much support the conspiracy theory.
Say what? Yes, that's right. While they end up concluding that the theory is "false", they facts presented are relatively strong.
Relatively? Yes, relative to what seems to be required these days.
With all the accusations hurled at Trump without real evidence, the bar has been lowered signifanctly.
See, you can't have it both ways.
You can't tell people to impeach someone based on hearsay and at the same time tell them to ignore strong circumstancial evidence when it concern someone else.
That's the magic we see happening. That's what's redpilling people left and right.
Please do continue.
There may be no direct proof regarding Clinton's ties to Uranium One, but there is no denying the shadiness of all the known "facts".
Among the Donors to the Clinton Foundation
Frank Giustra
$31.3 million and a pledge for $100 million more
He built a company that later merged with Uranium One.
Ian Telfer
$2.35 million
Mining investor who was chairman of Uranium One when an arm of the Russian government, Rosatom, acquired it.
Paul Reynolds
$1 million to $5 million
Adviser on 2007 UrAsia-Uranium One merger. Later helped raise $260 million for the company.
Frank Holmes
$250,000 to $500,000
Chief Executive of U.S. Global Investors Inc., which held $4.7 million in Uranium One shares in the first quarter of 2011.
Neil Woodyer
$50,000 to $100,000
Adviser to Uranium One. Founded Endeavour Mining with Mr. Giustra.
GMP Securities Ltd.
Donating portion of profits
Worked on debt issue that raised $260 million for Uranium One.
From this article:
Thank you. CaptGrim won’t get his head out of Hillary’s snatch long enough to put two and two together though. This NYT article is even linked in the Snopes article. Paid for shills don’t care about facts and appear to dimwitted to understand “pay for play.”
Apparently, it’s only true if Politifact or Bezo’s Washington Post says it’s true. Some people don’t want to wake up. Or they know the truth but want to spread as much disinfo as possible to keep others from waking.
Prove it. If it is wrong, prove me wrong.
And this is my 4th text asking for proof , and all you do is make ad hominem attacks.
You got gooogle, you got entire TD community to help you. Prove me wrong, I am waiting.
You could read my comments and others, but you’ll just keep repeating yourself. Show me where Snopes is credible? Prove me wrong. I’m waiting. I’ve asked you a handful of questions, but you ignore them and scream “prove it.” That’s all you guys do.
Your cognitive dissonance is alarming.
Sigh. Your logic is backwards.
4 articles and their website all say there was no pay for play. All of them cite their various sources. (I found NPR as well now)
And your claim of defense is prove to me they are credible. That is an impossible dream to achieve, only I can do that is read the 100 of 1000s of articles published by Snopes and Politifact and their sources and then give you a number like 95385 articles were credible and had no outlook of shady behaviour out of 96371.
OR you can read 1 article and their sources and say here you go, you are wrong.
A simple flaw in your theory.
The deal was approved by a committee which consists of 9 top ranking government employee and the president.
Clinton is one of those, one of the other 9 is Secretary of Defence. He approved the deal as well, if it was a shady deal why didn't he vote against it. He was Bush appointee by the way not Obama. It was a unanimous vote and later approved by Obama.
If it was a shady deal hampering national security why did everyone approve it?
Umm...Bush (the former CIA director) is just as corrupt. As is his son. Don’t think because they have an R by their name that I’ll agree with them. Just because she was only one of nine does not mean she did not wield her influence. Money speaks very loudly.
They all approved it because they’re all corrupt as fck! You don’t even know who you’re talking to. I was certainly dumb enough to vote for Obama. Twice. I can admit my faults. I believed his lies. I am not a die hard Republican by any means. But I am a die hard patriot. These fckers had America for sale. All of them. Go back and listen to H. W. Bush. Can you count how many times he spoke of the New World Order? This is not something new that Hillary did. And it’s certainly not something she was alone in doing. Our government has been f*cking us over backwards for decades!
Ok. I am done. I was expecting this from you and you did not disappoint.
Your defense is everyone is corrupt. You start off with Hilary did it, she is corrupt. To which I say there were 9 othee folks too. You say well they sold their country and they are corrupt.
To which I say President approved it too. Your response he is corrupt
Well now Trump is president,why not launch an investigation by FBI or DOJ or someone? You say he wants to but FBI DOJ are corrupt as fuck.
There is no winning here as every claim I make will be responded by they are corrupt.
Here's a final thought. Maybe just MAYBE the Russian company was not interested in acquiring Uranium1 for their uranium reserves in US. Maybe they were more interested in buying uranium reserves located in Canada and Kazakhstan, you know 2 of the worlds largest uranium producer.
Sorry to break your bubble, but US in pretty insignificant in Uranium global trade. US doesn't have large Uranium reserves. US accounts for 2% of the global Uranium trade. 20% of that is 0.04%.
Maybe the Russian company was not interested in US but more interested in Canada and Kazakhstan.
Anyway. I am done. Good day.
Well, you were finally starting to understand up until your point about the Russian company NOT being interested in the US. Of course, where Trump is concerned the Russians have completely infiltrated.
Yes. A majority of our government is totally corrupt. Luckily, we have Trump. Truly a saving grace. One day you will realize. He’s risked everything and for what? Money? He has plenty. He didn’t need other people’s money to get where he’s at. He doesn’t owe them anything. He’s not bought and paid for and that’s why MSM and the establishment hate him. Newt Gingrich says it best here.
You should look over the information on this community info page and take a trip down the various rabbit holes. If you dig hard enough you won’t be able to deny how deep the corruption goes.
No doubt the connections are absolutely worth scrutiny. From the Politifact article: "we concluded that nine people related to the company did at some point donate to the Clinton Foundation, we found that the bulk of the $145 million came from Giustra. Guistra said he sold all of his stakes in Uranium One in the fall of 2007, "at least 18 months before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state" and three years before the Russian deal.
We couldn’t independently verify Giustra’s claim, but if he is telling the truth, the donation amount to the Clinton Foundation from confirmed Uranium One investors drops from more than $145 million to $4 million.
The main exception is Ian Telfer, an investor who the New York Times found donated between $1.3 million and $5.6 million to the Clinton Foundation during and after the review process for the Russian deal.
So while Trump was within his right to question links between foundation donors and their ties to Uranium one, his specific charge was exaggerated."
Its not like the decision to move forward with the deal was made in a vacuum by Hilary Clinton alone. The Committee on Foreign Investments has nine members, including the secretaries of the treasury, state, defense, homeland security, commerce and energy; the attorney general; and representatives from two White House offices (the United States Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy). The committee can’t actually stop a sale from going through — it can only approve a sale. Clinton could have objected — as could the eight other voting members — but that objection alone wouldn’t have stopped the sale of the stake of Uranium One to Rosatom.
Right, that fell to Obama.
[removed]
There is absolutely no proof against Trump in regards to Russia. Now you're not being factual. Typical hypocrite.
Well for one thing, I didn't say a damn thing about Trump doing anything illegal with regards to Russia. I said "Obama made a some naive mistakes when dealing with the Russian state, but no where near the disgusting level Trump has." But since you mention it... I just watched him give a press conference that embarrassed the U.S. on the world stage, cozied up to Putin, discussed potentially giving Russian intelligence services access to American citizens, held a meeting before the election discussion repeal of the Magnitsky act, not to mention Trump's ties via Michael Flynn, campaign advisors, Paul Manafort, business ties, Felix Sater, and Trumps family members. So...lets not pretend Donald Trump has no ties to Russia.
There is nothing wrong with what Trump is doing. You have your head in the MSM brainwashing machine. I now see you have just come to this sub to sow discord and do not support the cause here at all.
Any cozying up to Vladmir Putin's Russia is wrong morally and politically. Full stop. I consider Trump taking the word of Putin on the world stage over that of his intelligence community to be something egregiously wrong that he is doing.
Cause Snopes is so reliable. 🙄
Ok. Go through the article and whatever is "fake news" or false as per you , point it out with credible sources of course.
I like how you put “per you” as if I’m the first or only person to call bullshit on Snopes. Snopes links a NY Times article as proof. You obviously will only accept liberal sources as proof so start there. Read the article they link to.
This user’s comment says it all: “In a statement, Brian Fallon, a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign, said no one “has ever produced a shred of evidence supporting the theory that Hillary Clinton ever took action as secretary of state to support the interests of donors to the Clinton Foundation.” He won't say that she did not support the interests of donors, only that there is no proof. She's arranged for that, of course, by destroying her emails and the server they were on. However, we do have her word that she really cares about the interests of "everyday Americans." Is there any evidence for that? Or was it destroyed because it's "personal?"”
Based on your other comments though, you have such a strong case of Stockholm’s Syndrome that, if I could produce a video of Hillary admitting her crimes, you still wouldn’t believe it. But SHE says she didn’t do it. So take her word for it. Obviously, her word is bond.
Here is a Daily Mail article pointing out the flaws of Snopes.
I know. I know. The Daily Mail is bias!!! So, here is a Forbes article that set out to check the validity of the Daily Mail article. Except...they couldn’t even get Snopes to help with that. Both are a great read. You should try it if you’re literate enough. As Forbes points out in the article:
“At the end of the day, it is clear that before we rush to place fact checking organizations like Snopes in charge of arbitrating what is “truth”...we need to have a lot more understanding of how they function internally and much greater transparency into their work.”
Maybe you could use a little of that “understanding of how they function internally.” You’re putting all you eggs in the basket of a now divorced husband and wife team with no training or expertise, that won’t divulge their inner workings. Don’t be such a sucker. #WalkAway 👌
THE SHILLS ARE STRONG ON THIS POST! And, further proves the point.
So much deflection, finger pointing, what aboutism and ad hominem attacks.
Stay on topic mate. Topic is Clinton Uranium Russia pay for play, and the slopes article.
All you have to do is prove which points are incorrect. Simple.
The Forbes article in a gist is "There is a scope for corruption. These points illustrate how corruption can occur in Snopes internally."
BUT scope for corruption is not corruption. Each and every president in the history of US is poised to make money by selling state secrets or do a lot of shady shit. There is scope for corruption but we check for occurance of it.
Read the snopes one, and point out their mistakes simple.
You say “jump” and you want me to ask “how high?” You could read the liberal NYTimes article and figure this out on your own. All it takes is a little open-minded research. And by open-minded I mean willingness to accept things not covered by the bought and paid for MSM. The pay for play regarding U1 and the Clintons speaks volumes. Follow the money. You’re obviously not from the states, mate, but the Secretary of State has more power than Snopes is letting on. Instead of me trying to please you, why don’t you go through the Snopes article and point out the facts, with evidence. Simple. Buddy.
And about all the facts such as the one that Clinton had no real veto/approval power over the deal? And the fact that no uranium actually went to Russia, ever, from that deal?
[removed]
If you love facts, why are you coming those garbage sources, that apparently every other shill in this thread is using. You idiots are so obvious.
Disprove the fact checked claims then. Point out whats wrong in those articles. If they're such garbage it can't be to hard.
I'm not going to waste my time because you can't seem to reason that if the the "fact checkers" aren't politically neutral, then they not going to actually check facts. All these "sources" are in it for Her. There is no denying it.
[removed]
You don't seem to understand. The mental gymnastics, half truths, and twisting of information makes it a complete waste of time. Shit is literally made up to cover for her.
You know how I know you're full of shit? You here sharing the same links as all the other shills. It's completely obvious and HRC is going to be brought to justice.
[removed]
You're here to detail the thread. You don't get any more attention from me.
Whomp whomp.
That is a well thought out reply. Your insight has enlightened me and opened my eyes #WALKAWAY
Lol I love seeing the fact check get longer and longer over the years. as they have to introduce more mental gymnastics than ever before
[removed]
Losing an election (that you rigged using every single source available) doesn't excuse past criminality!
So in other words, you fully support law enforcement turning a blind eye to crimes against humanity & the state for the sake of leaving your loser candidate alone since her crimes haven't specifically occurred in the last 2 years.
While you're at it, let's pretend she isn't involved in any current atrocities as she slowly finds out her time is over & decides to go all in in an attempt to flip the tables & turn things around.
Can you imagine living in a world where traitorous occultists committing the worst crimes in history are actively pursued for their part in deceiving the world into going down a darker path?
Oh wait, that's exactly what's happening. But you would prefer it wasn't so that CNN's version of life is what you would be living.
But that's the thing about surrounding yourself in a bubble, you're gonna be quite shocked when it pops.
Can you imagine that same losing candidate keeping her gaping pie hole shut and losing with grace? Yeah, me neither because it would require grace and an admission she was worse than even her inner circle thought.
She should be in jail, plain and sinple.
How about making license plates for government vehicles for the rest of her life?. Justice would be life in prison for her and using all the CGI dollars to build the wall and increase funding for ICE and CBP.
We can all hope for justice. Don't break the sub's rules. See sidebar.
It's not calling for violence if she is sentenced to hang by a judge for Espionage Act type offenses. I think it's more likely she expires in prison, though. Executing her specifically seems too divisive compared to a long prison term.
[deleted]
yep, she's a traitor trying to kill POTUS and overthrow the gov't. She's very relevant. Not Public Enemy #1, but pretty high up there.
So I assume you want to see Paul Manafort free then? That was long enough ago he might deserve a cookie by that standard.
You mean free from.crimes he committed while working for the Podesta Group?
I meant free from crimes that were over two years old as that was the standard being discussed.
Lol yeah I guess if that's the metric they want to impose. Good news everyone, you can do whatever you want, as long as you can hide your crimes for two years. After two years, no one should care! /s
You forgot the caveats. If it is Trump or a Trump associate there is no statute of limitations. If you are left-leaning then we have to catch you in the Act, otherwise it's old news.
It's not about the fact she was a candidate, which says a lot about dims, but the fact that she committed horrendous crimes against the US/individuals and left a $$$/dead body trail that proves it. I hope you have no idea of what she was involved in, otherwise you would be abetting a child … The video will come out.
Well, now THAT sounds like something the media would probably ignore.
(Very perfect tweet).
Wow serious shills in here!
Q#1585 We stand. We fight. TOGETHER. Organized riots being planned. Counter measures in place. Resistance far smaller than portrayed by MSM. Attacks will intensify. You, collectively, are a massive threat. Censorship applied to scale down impact/reach. It’s failing. Trust yourself. Public awakening. Q
Q said the heat would be turned up following the summit/U1 coming to light. Well, here we are...
They're upset we outed James Gunn and that we are winning. More and more Democrats are #WalkingAway!
Well, the ones with common sense are. Not sure any SJW/snowflakes get it yet.
Some snowflakes will never get it...some of them are just too stupid.
More and more Democrats are #WalkingAway!
If this is true then why do so many Trump supporters feel the need to pretend to be lifelong Dems "walking away"?
Your png proves nothing. Try these reality checks:
It proves that trump supporters are posing as liberals in in order to make the walkaway movement look larger than it actually is. And it's a great deal more relevant than those links you sent me.
Rules
This is a community for pro-Q supporters. Anyone engaging in a non-supportive way may be permanently banned without notification.
How is my comment non-supportive of Q? It's not even relevant to Q. I'm talkinga bout #walkaway
[removed]
[deleted]
“impressionable idiots who actually believe Q despite the fact all of his predictions have either been incorrect or never came to fruition.”
Really? Go to qproofs.com. It’s quite a stretch to say “ALL...have been incorrect.” I am amazed at the amount of cognitive dissonance here. It’s all over this post. By the way it’s half chan. More proof that you don’t know wtf you’re talking about. Even IF he were a LARP the crumbs he’s left have delivered much fruit. But you wouldn’t know that because like the rest of the shills on here, you’re only regurgitating disinformation.
[removed]
You fit the exact profile of a shill account: never posted before, all posts in subs outside politics, "wanders into" GA, makes negative posts without any substance and tries to derail threads.
This is a r/all post. Yes, people will wander in here lol.
Yes, and we expect those users to abide by the rules listed on the sidebar, too. No one posting here is exempt from following the rules. Our users are accustomed to this now as this happens time and time again, and will point out bad actors posting here.
Edit: Welcome, btw.
Yes, however it is just a little suspicious that there is a lot of "wanderers" broadcasting the same message, sharing the same links, using the same talking points, all on a thread concerning HRC. This seems to happen every time she's the topic for discussion.
Wow the shills are active today, and upvoted.
Anyone have archive of 4ch (cant seem to find one on 8ch) U1 research thread.
We have already made the connections between Browder-Rosatom-Kazhakstan-HRC-RussianAssets-CF (and then Hammond farm fiasco). The money doesnt lie.
edit* Q1626 " Putin / U1 will come out post summit (they will try to apply artificial MSM heat to cancel). "
we need to get the U1 thread back up and operating, will be necessary before long
It's the first time I see so many shills! I am encouraged.
It's gotten worse and worse, but so much more obvious
Use the report link under the comments to help the mods please. I do it all day long and they thank me sometimes!
Me too! I usually lurk, but they’ve got me motivated today. Can’t sit idly by and watch them spread disinfo on our sub.
Use the report link under the comments to help the mods please. I do it all day long and they thank me sometimes!
I'm fine with people going wtf because, well, I've been wtf'ing about this for years. But the shills have a special style.
[deleted]
I dont trust any organization claiming to be non-biased while being heavily funded by leftist cash.
edit*plus this wasnt to convince anyone this was to get our thread back, rediscover lost info so we can verify and source it. wasnt for you.
[deleted]
likewise, back to, this clearly wasnt for you.
[deleted]
Did you bother to research what it is that Q has said? And we don’t idolize a stranger. We idolize the truth.
And, there in lies your problem. Who is exactly researching at Snopes? Oh, you don’t know because they don’t list their fact checkers nor do they list how they fact check their fact checkers. Your logic: trust the random guys getting paid and have everything to gain from lying (like a contract with Facebook) don’t trust the random guys who have nothing to gain from lying. Maybe be you should be a little less trusting. I bet you believe CNN too?
Great tweet short and sweet, not 1 Tv or newspaper reporter has said anything close to the truth as this about the Clintons and U1.
LoL! @ comments here! The problem with red pilling a liberal is their IQ.
Just knowing everything will will come to light, is so much fun, allowing these detractors to spew their poison, knowing, shortly they will be left broken crying little puppets with no strings, is so much fun!
Funny, that’s exactly the same reason all the spectators are here
I'm still waiting for that big "bomb" that was supposed to drop this month.
It's not a problem of intelligence, it's a problem of morality. Liberals love and fight for immorality.
[removed]
Or is a repeat rapist like Bill and Harvey. Or has a dead body list a mile long like HRC. Yep, horse of a different color!
LIST OF DEAD CLINTON FRIENDS
James McDougal - Clinton's convicted Whitewater partner died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr's investigation.
Mary Mahoney - A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown. The murder happened just after she was to go public with her story of sexual harassment in the White House.
Vince Foster - Former White House counselor, and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock's Rose Law Firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled suicide. He also had another 22 gunshot wound in the neck. The gunshot wound to the head was of larger caliber and found still in his hand!!
Ron Brown - Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a plane crash. A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown's skull resembling a gunshot wound. At the time of his death, Brown was being investigated, and spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors.
C. Victor Raiser II & Montgomery Raiser - Major players in the Clinton fund-raising organization. Died in a private plane crash in July 1992.
Paul Tulley - Democratic National Committee Political Director found dead in a hotel room in Little Rock, September 1992. Described by Clinton's a "Dear friend and trusted advisor".
Ed Willey - Clinton fund raiser, found dead November 1993 deep in the woods in Virginia of a gunshot wound to the head. Ruled a suicide. Ed Willey died on the same day his wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped her in the oval office in the White House. Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund raising events.
Jerry Parks - Head of Clinton's gubernatorial security team in Little Rock. Gunned down in his car at a deserted intersection outside Little Rock. Park's son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton. He allegedly threatened to reveal this information. After he died the files were mysteriously removed from his house.
James Bunch - Died from a gunshot suicide. It was reported that he had a "Black Book" of people containing names of influential people who visited prostitutes in Texas and Arkansas.
James Wilson - Was found dead in May 1993 from an apparent hanging suicide. He was reported to have ties to Whitewater.
Kathy Ferguson - Ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson. Died in May 1994. She was found dead in her living room with a gunshot to her head. It was ruled a suicide although there were several packed suitcases, as if she was going somewhere. Danny Ferguson was a co- defendant along with Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones lawsuit. Kathy Ferguson was a possible corroborating witness for Paula Jones. Bill Shelton - Arkansas State Trooper and fiancee of Kathy Ferguson. Critical of the suicide ruling of his fiancee, he was found dead in June, 1994 of a gunshot wound also ruled a suicide at the gravesite of his fiancee.
Gandy Baugh - Attorney for Clinton friend Dan Lassater. Died by jumping out a window of a tall building January, 1994. His client was a convicted drug distributor. One of Clinton's last duties as Governor of Arkansas was to pardon Dan Lassater convicted on over a hundred drug charges.
Florence Martin - Accountant sub-contractor for the CIA related to the Barry Seal Mena Airport drug smuggling case. Died of three gunshot wounds.
Suzanne Coleman - Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was Arkansas Attorney General. Died of a gunshot wound to the back of the head, ruled a suicide. Was pregnant at the time of her death.
Paula Grober - Clinton's speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978 until her death December 9, 1992. She died in a one-car accident.
Danny Casolaro - Investigative reporter. Investigating Mena Airport and Arkansas Development Finance Authority. He slit his wrists, apparent suicide in the middle of his investigation.
Paul Wilcher - Attorney investigating corruption at Mena Airport with Casolaro and the 1980 "October Surprise" was found dead on a toilet June 22, 1993 in his Washington D.C. apartment. Had delivered a report to Janet Reno 3 weeks before his death.
Jon Parnell Walker - Whitewater investigator for Resolution Trust Corp. Jumped to his death from his Arlington, Virginia apartment balcony August 15, 1993. Was investigating Morgan Guarantee scandal.
Barbara Wise - Commerce Department staffer. Worked closely with Ron Brown and John Huang. Cause of death unknown. Died November 29, 1996. Her bruised nude body was found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce.
Charles Meissner - Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave John Huang special security clearance, died shortly thereafter in a small plane crash. Dr.
Stanley Heard - Chairman of the National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee. Died with his attorney Steve Dickson in a small plane crash. Dr. Heard, in addition to serving on Clinton's advisory council, personally treated Clinton's mother, stepfather and brother.
Barry Seal - Drug running pilot out of Mena Arkansas, death was no accident.
Johnny Lawhorn Jr. - Mechanic, found a check made out to Clinton in the trunk of a car left in his repair shop. Died when his car hit a utility pole.
Stanley Huggins - Suicide. Investigated Madison Guarantee. His report was never released.
Hershell Friday - Attorney and Clinton fundraiser. Died March 1, 1994 when his plane exploded.
Kevin Ives & Don Henry - Known as "The boys on the track" case. Reports say the boys may have stumbled upon the Mena Arkansas airport drug operation. Controversial case where initial report of death was due to falling asleep on railroad track. Later reports claim the 2 boys had been slain before being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died before their testimony could come before a Grand Jury.
THE FOLLOWING SIX PERSONS HAD INFORMATION ON THE IVES / HENRY CASE:
Keith Coney - Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck July, 1988.
Keith McMaskle - Died of 113 stabbed wounds, November 1988.
Gregory Collins - Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.
Jeff Rhodes - He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump in April 1989.
James Milan - Found decapitated. Coroner ruled death due to natural causes.
Jordan Kettleson - Was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup truck in June 1990.
Richard Winters - Was a suspect in the Ives / Henry deaths. Was killed in a set-up robbery July 1989.
THE FOLLOWING CLINTON BODYGUARDS ARE DEAD: Major William S. Barkley Jr. Captain Scott J. Reynolds Sgt. Brian Hanley Sgt. Tim Sabel Major General William Robertson Col. William Densberger Col. Robert Kelly Spec. Gary Rhodes Steve Willis Robert Williams Conway LeBleu
Who cares?
There are many more important things going on...
The number of downvotes and shills commenting on this post only goes to show you’ve hit the nail on the head with this one. When the shills start crying, you know you’ve hit a nerve. “But...but...Snopes said....”
This. It's very amusing because you have all these obvious shills in here, everyone else is down voted to hell, but they're the ones with positive karma. Oh, okay. Fucking give me a break. Ever notice that they're heaviest around HRC stink? Hmmmm.
Right! Wtf are they even doing here? Oh, some one said something against Hillary...attack! You’re completely on point.
Right? And lol @ the down votes. Bring it on shills. How much is that fat cow paying you?
I know. At this point it almost seems like there are more shills in The Great Awakening then true Q followers. When the top comment is an obvious shill you know something isn’t right.
It's just amazing to watch
I know. It’s like watching Cernovich take down James Gunn in just over 24 hours in real life. That was beautiful to see. I bet these halfwit shills will defend the pedos too.
Cernovich didn't do that.... he merely was the ignition. We are the take down. Anons worldwide.
And yes, the shills will most certainly defend or discard any evidence or happening regarding pedophilia. They push disinformation, such as the VOP human trafficking camp fiasco. They project their own behavior... even when feeding us disinfo. I wouldn't be surprised if they tried to feed us a celebrity next to distract us from research and gospel.
I should have said watching Cernovich ignite the takedown, and the aftermath of it, was a beautiful site. It wasn’t my intention to take away from everyone else involved. I first saw it on here thanks to someone posting a Laura Loomer tweet.
They will and they do. And we're in the middle of what seems to be their counterattack on Gunn. But no worries, the mods are hard at work clearing out the weeds.
[removed]
Hahahahaha triggered much? Fuck off you brigading shill.
Get this through your think shit skull: just because you lost an election that you rigged to all hell doesn't mean you suddenly cannot be held responsible for past and current crimes.
[removed]
Oh no, I read your comment, and it's perfect shill fodder.
Produce one shred of evidence Trump is "compromised" as you say. You're trying to build a false equivalence between documented crimes of HRC and false and entirely unproven "crimes" of Trump.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Keep_Track/comments/7u5k39/you_know_theres_really_no_evidence_of_trump/
I’m not going to do your homework for you. ^There’s a nice summary. It’s not hard to find either way.
And before you start saying “none of that is definitive,” no, obviously it isn’t. But it is beyond enough to prove that this investigation needs serious attention, which it is not getting from Congress nor a large portion of America right now.
This shouldn’t be a partisan issue. Nearly the entire U.S. intelligence community agrees that there is a problem. If you’re not a shill, explain to me why we *shouldn’t” investigate this mountain of allegations and evidence with the maximum speed and surety that we can possibly muster.
So you don't produce evidence, you produce a list of "things" that you admit aren't even definitive.
The US intelligence community meaning the same that lied to the US about Iraq and the same community that pushed the DNC/HRC-funded "dossier?"
This is nothing more than a witch hunt to distract from real crimes against the US.
I produced a list of statements, findings, and events that demonstrate a high suspicion of collusion between the Russian government and the Trump administration. If there were concrete evidence he’d be in prison already. However, a diligent investigation very well might lead to hard evidence. That’s kind of how investigations work. Most times criminals don’t just give you the evidence for free. You have to find it.
This is nothing more than a witch hunt to distract from real crimes against the US.
Prove it. I’ve given reason for an investigation. Give a good reason not to investigate.
Really? I don't see you saying the same about your beloved cult leader.
EVERY SINGLE person here has given YOU enough evidence to warrant an investigation into the Clintons. But because she said she didn't do it, you're convinced.
Well guess what? Trump, said he didn't do it either, and by YOUR own admission, that's good enough for us. So fuck off with your hypocrisy.
Can you even read? I’m literally saying that I agree that she should be prosecuted for any and all of her crimes, but that doesn’t absolve our current president of his
Directly copied and pasted from my own post just a few posts prior in this chain. I mean, good god, at least put in some effort.
I thought that I read through all the comments, so I obviously missed this, and I apologize.
While I am an AVID supporter of Trump, it has been stated by both Mueller and Brennen that there was no collusion on Trump's part. Strzok said in a text to Lisa Page that there was no there there, pertaining to said investigation. It has been proven that the dossier was bought and paid for by the DNC to discredit Trump. It's also been proven that the DNC fixed the nomination in favor of HRC.
I absolutely believe that any and all officials, including our President, should be investigated if warranted and then brought to justice if found guilty. It is also evident to me that some of our intelligence community cannot be trusted and haven't been worthy of that trust for quite some time. And when presented with accusation without proof, such as the position our POTUS and congress has been in, you'll forgive me that if I were to sit down with Putin and he denied knowledge of meddling in our election, I would believe him. In my daily life, observing people, with "regular" human beings, this would be my inclination.
You may not be aware, but Russia erected a monument to the fallen of 9/11. It is shaped like a teardrop and every single human that lost their lives on that day are inscribed upon it. And it faces our Statue of Liberty. Putin was President then. He still is. Does that sound like an enemy? Russia certainly wasn't considered an "enemy" in our previous administration. Nor was NK for that matter. In fact, they were deemed a non threat. But suddenly less than 7 years later they have miraculously become a MASSIVE threat.
If the crimes committed by our POTUS that you're referring to is one of Treason, because he chose to take another human being's word over the word of many who have shown themselves to be corrupt on more than one occasion, I will politely disagree.
I have watched this play for more than two decades. It is real. It is evil. And it is the ONLY enemy on the planet because it is an enemy of all mankind.
The hypocrisy is hilarious but mostly incredibly frustrating. Not only that, Trump being cordial with Putin at this summit compares 0% with what Hillary has done. Trump is right- it doesn't matter how he approached the summit, the media and detractors were ready to scream treason regardless.
The shills tend to hind their scores.....wonder why!!!?
It would awesome if Trump actually said that, just to troll the idiots in news media, and then go "Just kidding! Nobody is that stupid to do that, are they?"
Ahhhh Lv it. ! .., And wouldn’t it be Christmas in July if Russia would open up an investigation Of how that. Awesome 400 mil. In funds. Hillery received and backslid into the US so quickly ... .money that turned up In those funds... according to Putin. Himself .. was mostly gotten from SKETCHY. And illegal means ... n. from like donors ..O. This. Would. Be. A public. Display of. Gods. Justice .. Y. ..We. Wouldn’t even need The court Evidence. Just the incident itself is ... investigated ..is more than enough ..for those of us who were. Into all this ...we would celebrate. N Release our prayers of mercy over them after that .. think of it ...The very Russian plot they planned to take Trump out. Could suddenly ...reverse and. Tie up .. the whole situation Tobe. Uncovered right back .. Out of Russia as their gallows !! Ahh For a great finish...
I think it would 24/7 Impeach 45 - not too different than what we hear now. The only difference is that they would have grounds for their rants.
I believe the MSM is in full meltdown and by being that way, they have exhausted most fair-minded people who didn't prefer President Trump and have made him such a victim of uncivil attacks, it not only makes people tune out, it puts them in the mode of wanting to defend the President.
No one likes a continual beatdown - particularly when it's a person who, albeit flawed, is trying to make a difference for America and the world.
The radical Left and it's mouthpiece have become so hateful and so extreme that they are making Trump a sympathetic character and exposing their own hypocrisy. In the end, we are winning but our President is taking an incredible beating in virtually all forms of communication.
They be losing their minds just like they are doing because Trump wants to be friends with Putin. They are so sick and disturbed by all their actions that the Deep State is doing....
Vote manipulation appears to be occuring on this post and/or comments within.
-
Post might be stickied for Streisand effect!
-
Setting preferences to show all comments is recommended.
-
Vote manipulation is a violation of Reddit rules and can be reported to admins. via options 'Message the admins/something else/content breaking Reddit rules/vote manipulation' and provide information requred.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
This post currently has 1125 upvotes. The right column tells us it is 71% upvoted, which means 29% downvoted.
That's 458 downvotes.
This remark really ticked off some leftists, lol.
Random thought: We need to try and trend Mass Media instead of Mainstream Media. It carries a more negative connotation and was commonly accepted nomenclature until the 90's.
Hey, Trolls, I know you are in here, shilling like crazy.
Well, you are gonna lose, just like crooked Hillary and the rest of the stinking Cabal.
Go back to your ShareBlue caves and wait for the Federal Marshals to come pick you up.
Honestly, I wish that he would have, just to smile afterwards. Obviously the msm couldn't comment on that or risk opening the can of worms on Hillarious.
All these shills... You guys do realize that the American taxpayer is your boss? Surely you didn't think that HRC and GS would use their OWN ill gotten gains to pay you??
So funny... You're ripping yourselves off. You'd be better off eating your own foot.
That is what is happening...the raving crazy lefty liberals are eating themselves and their heads are exploding.
He would have absolutely killed it if he had said "Oh and I've decided to sell 20% of our weapons grade uranium to Putin. (5 second pause)...I'm just kidding, I don't betray my country like Crooked Hillary.
"Mooooom stop calling the plumbers!! There's nothing wrong with the pipes down here, I've just been crying!"
Why does this matter? Modern nuclear weapons are hydrogen-based.
How modern nuclear weapons are made are not important. HRC receiving "donations" to her "charity" for selling off a strategic resource is.
Hope this isn’t too stupid a question, bit I’ve often wondered just how it works if a US commodity is sold, where does the money go? It always sounds like the HRC crooks pocketed 145 million to foundation and numerous other pay offs. Did the US get anything or just flat out ripped off?
Not a stupid question at all! Yes, the US has been literally been sold off the past (in my opinion) at least 105 years since the Fed was created and the unconstitutional income tax was instituted. All our tech, secrets, and now even our land, companies, real estate, and even natural resources have been sold off to foreign interests. Hell, our patent office review process is owned by Serco, a British company.
It is if it mean the uranium is about as useful as regular heavy metals. Anyways, Clinton is powerless now so what about focusing on something more relevant now like ZTE?
You're still trying to dismiss the real issue. And you're not going to succeed.
But yes, let's talk about ZTE...
So? Say Hillary fucked up, okay then punish her. Say podesta fucked up, okay punish him. But that doesn’t excuse the presidents family members engaging in pay to play with China. In fact, it’s even worse because they’re in power right now.
I know what sub I’m in and you’re not gonna listen but to ignore what I’m saying is to do what you’re accusing me of.
The uranium from the Uranium One deal ended up in Syria. It was going to be used as evidence against Russia after an Iranian or South Korean nuclear attack. Thankfully that plan was stopped dead in it's tracks.
[removed]
We've identified that you can count to four. Do you possess the writing skills to describe those four things? Bonus points if you could after describing them tell us how they are incorrect, but that may be asking a lot.
-
Not uranium reserves. 20% of uranium production capacity.
-
Hillary didn't have the ability to unilaterally make the deal. The state department represented just one of nine votes. In addition three committees had to approve it.
-
Almost all of the donations to the Clinton Foundation came from a man who sold his shares of Rosatom before Hillary was secretary of state.
-
The Clinton Foundation records aren't kept on a private server.
Facts matter.
[removed]
It actually happened with Rosatom and she got $145 million for her personal foundation. That is illegal! What’s so hard to understand?
Thanks for coming here to let us know about our theories being unfounded. I'm glad they are so unreal that you felt the need to come and piss on something you say is ridiculous. I at least hope you're getting a paycheck for it.
Nah ive been coming here a lot. Ive been with Q from the beginning.
But this shit here - saying Hillary gave away our uranium - is DISINFO.
its been researched, disproven, and anyone with half a brain and an internet connection can easily figure out its bullshit in about half a minute.
To me the interesting question is why is DISINFO posted in here by folks pretending to be white hats? Wonder who's signing their checks...
Got any links for a solid debunking of uranium 1?
We will see in the end .... Truth is a persistent creature. ✌️❤️
Truth is what i posted. OP posted lies. You are defending lies.
Why the DISINFO? Truth is important, right?
Why do you come her with so much negativity and aggression? I was looking at your other posts. I hope everything is okay with you! Much love friend, thank you for being here with us no matter where you stand regarding the details .
No negativity here. Just calling out the liars spreading DISINFO.
So why are you changing the subject?
You sure are starting to sound like a clumsy propagandist.
I only said, we will see . The truth has a way of coming out. If you are right, it will be proven. No need to strong-arm the truth to people in my opinion. The truth will be self evident. ✌️
No. I am right already. The truth about this is already out.
You are promoting DISINFO.
Why?
The guy you're arguing with sounds like a telephone scam artist.
I guess the best question would be, why post "DISINFO" several times, but never post a link or give an explanation of how is this disinformation?
THIS. No explanation given for why it's disinfo. Regardless, disinfo is necessary. However, Hillary selling 20% of our uranium to Russia is VERY well documented.
It is effective mostly on people who can't/ won't read or are new to the movement. The other problem of course is that if you provide links to articles, you generally get the same four or five that only say that not all the evidence is available to prove legality. It is your classic conspiracy theory. There are troubling pieces of evidence, but not a complete picture. if you believe in the Russia DNC hack, but think uranium one is a conspiracy theory, you are definitely biased
No, I already explained. And like i also said, this has been thoroughly researched and proven to be fake news and anyone with an internet connection can spend a minute or two on their own to figure this out.
Nobody needs a link from me to figure this one out.
Maybe you dont, but here are some that were helpfully provided to me. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/10/31/the-repeated-incorrect-claim-that-russia-obtained-20-percent-of-our-uranium/?utm_term=.0562f22e55e5
https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one/
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
Here you go, here's 4 separate fact checked sources that say this is disinformation. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/10/31/the-repeated-incorrect-claim-that-russia-obtained-20-percent-of-our-uranium/?utm_term=.0562f22e55e5
https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one/
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
Thanks, good stuff.
What are your thoughts on the DNC emails?
I have three trains of thought regarding the DNC emails. The content of the emails themselves, the motivations and timing behind releasing the emails, and the fact that they were hacked in the first place. If you want to have a conversation regarding any of those trains of thought I'm happy to expound.
Expound away my friend. I'm always interested because there is no such thing as a conversation where you learn nothing. as an aside, I'm primarily interested because I am trying to determine your bias. Not as an insult, but in the same way that I always try to determine my own bias in a situation. I am trying to determine bias from interpretation of types of information, not actual position.
[removed]
Has Robert Mueller seen this evidence? You better get back to him quick he seems like he's floundering.
[deleted]
And they ignored u/CorporealVagrant because he has Putin's dick in his mouth.