>>18388585 pb
i disagree with:
"believing (anything) is irrational."
As Albert Einstein supposedly posited, ~The universe is understandable~ that's why we can figure things out ~ to paraphrase.
When you do logic, you start with definitions:
"Rational", means a balance between various inputs of the five senses.
"Ration"
It's judgment which "discerns" meanings from the various inputs.
Looking up in old dictionary for definition of "Rational"
It's a "hard word"? kek
"imb[d]ued with reason" "Reasonable"
The universe is reasonable, that's why we can figure things out.
Word "RATIO" also meant "Reason, Consideration, Regard"
So "ratio" between parts.
Weighing different elements? Sorting things out?
and all those words implicitly refer to subjective consciousness as the "actor" -
Which modern "science" claims is a mirage, an illusion.
Recently vid clip of a lecture given by a close associate of Karl Schwab , the right-hand man to Schwab, explicitly stated this: There is no intentionality to the human brain. All Programming. again. to paraphrase.
No "There There" in other words.( this mistake of theirs (the would -be dominators) could be why their AI seems to always miss deadlines and turn-out a dud?)
This idea of "no such thing as consciousness" has been progressing along these lines for long time (from my limited lifetime's experience) see the date on the Cover for "Science Digest"
When they can't explain or don't have a proper definition which is satisfactory, they just claim it doesn't exist?
Instead of "I don't know" they pretend it doesn't exist?
Much more could be said on this, but anon can just say for now
Look to the work of Rupert Sheldrake. Some young people could probably catch up on the reading fast, if we weren't in the middle of a War. or Otherwise, if they just want to
Rupert Sheldrake, the biologist, goes into the history of this progession of ideas about the Human "Soul" (also does great work on the mechanism of genes; authentic scientist, Member of Royal Academy, Banned from Tedx)
Soul's location has been shrinking through modern history.
first surrounding the whole body.
Then in the heart.
Then maybe in one cell in the brain
(the homunculus?)
Now it's denied.
Rudolf Steiner supposedly spoke in a lecture close to the time of his death, 100 years ago ( maybe a few years before his death?) where he stated flat out the sinister occultists (his term), who I assume are the elite he knew of himself, being a German occultist, ) would have a shot, an inoculation, wherein they would attempt to disturb or sever the connection of the human to the world of the spirit.
fast forward to Bill Gates:
A lecture of his is recorded where he plots to create an injection which would target the gene they found, which is believed to related to a strong religious sentiment.
That religious predisposition appear to angers him - he wants to erase it. He thinks religious people cause wars , etc. Or at least he says so.
Other believe the dominators know that their charges, who they need to control, need to worship their leaders, who would be supplanted by a spiritual God.
Americans have tradition that their rights devolve to them by virtue of their birth, in Nature and by God - not dependent upon government.
So naturally this specifically American allegiance would obstruct any plans for a despotic government, wherein the population otherwise would be reduced to the status of live stock?
the wannabe dominators excuse for elimination of religious people is that religions cause rivalry (everybody has to be the same under one World Order - (ironically they use a cry of "diversity" to eliminate it?) Religion and Spirituality is something without usefulness, a holdover from the retarded past?
This intention of the elite is a large part of the eugenics program now being rolled out.
Finally it was thought the "soul" was in the pineal gland.
Now, it's just that it doesn't exist.
In other words, you don't exist.
You're just a figment of some brain activity.
From a truly scientific P.O.V.
You can prove this, or not, to yourself one way or another.
Famous line "Know Thyself."
I've often thought "If they don't think they exist, why are they arguing with me?"
? Where's is their argument?
kek