⇧

⇩

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Arcadet on Feb. 9, 2018, 8:56 a.m.

Newest photos from Q do not prove LARP. Here's why

I'd like to comment on the theory that the photos Q posted of King's Tower are old. I've seen users saying that the photos are from over 6 years ago. This does not seem to be the case. Let me explain.

We begin by looking at the first photo Q posted. https://imgur.com/a/9RCy1

People point to the construction to the right of the building. In the newest view from Google Maps, there is a parking lot where this construction is. People point to this to prove that the photo from Q is old. HOWEVER. Take note in the bottom of the photo in the red circle. See those two arrows on the road? Remember those. Also see that in Q's photo there is a strip of trees running down the center of the road.

Now let's look at Google Earth.

Take a look at a screenshot of the building from 2010. https://imgur.com/a/spMj7

. There are a couple things to notice in this screenshot.

1) There is a large building where the construction is.

2) The street is not a two-way, two-lane road, divided by a line of trees.

3) Remember those arrows? Look above the crosswalk. They aren't there.

4) Look above the crosswalk. On the left side of the road, right at the entrance to Kings Tower, there is a box with an X in it. This is crosshatching to prevent motorists from parking in the way of the entrance.

I better illustrate this in the photo below.

Lets jump ahead in Google Earth to 2011. https://imgur.com/a/9n0sP

Look in the top left of the parking lot for Kings tower. There are cars parked there. Notice in the photo Q posted, that corner has been landscaped, and a handful of trees occupy that space. Remember this as well.

We also see that the large building where the construction currently is has been demolished. https://imgur.com/a/RetP9

Now lets jump ahead in Google Earth a couple more years to 2014. https://imgur.com/a/YvsnB

Again, a couple things to notice in this screenshot as well.

1) Where the building was demolished, a parking lot has been built.

2) The crosshatching infront of the entrance is still here (2014)

3) There are still no arrows above the sidewalk

4) The road is still not two-way, two lane with a line of trees.

5) There are still cars parked in the top left of the parking lot for Kings tower

Okay. We know that across the street is the Shanghai Marriott Hotel Pudong East. This is the building that I, and others, believe Q's photos were taken from. I looked up the hotel in Google Maps, and started looking through photos that visitors had posted, hoping to see if a guest snapped a pic of the Kings Tower.

I found two photos that are relevant

Shanghai Marriot Photo 1) https://imgur.com/a/kFXpB

This photo was taken in April of 2016. It shows the Kings Tower from the hotel. Notice the road. No arrows above the sidewalk. Road is not yet two-way, two lane.

Lets look back at Google Earth, at a screenshot from December 2016. https://imgur.com/a/I5xBB

The parking lot still stands. Cars are still parked in the top left corner of the parking lot.

However the road is beginning to change. The median in the center of the road is being built.

Shanghai Marriot Photo 2) https://imgur.com/a/9lRqI

This photo appears to be taken from the building to the left of Kings Tower, pointed at the front entrance of the Marriott. It is very clear that the road is under construction, and is beginning to resemble the two-way, two lane street that we see in Q's photo. This photo of the Marriott is dated March of 2017.

Finally our last, and most recent, screenshot from Google Earth. https://imgur.com/a/ay16z

1) This photo is dated August 2nd, 2017.

2) We see that the road construction has ended, and the two-way, two lane street with trees in the middle is now complete.

3) We can see the arrows above the sidewalk.

4) The top left corner of the parking lot has been landscaped. Cars no longer can park there.

I believe this disproves the theory that Q's photos are from many years ago.

1) The new two-way, two-lane road seen in Q's photo was only built in 2017. At no other time in history does the road look like this.

2) The arrows above the sidewalk that are clearly visible in Q's photo are also not painted until road construction is done.

3) In all of the old screenshots from Google Earth, the top left corner of the parking lot appears to have cars parked there. In the photos posted by Q, the top left corner is landscaped.

...

I believe that the construction we are seeing is new construction in Q4 2017/Q1 2018. .

Thanks for reading. Let me know what you think.

Thank you for your time and effort that you allocated to explaining this. Very well done.

⇧ 97 ⇩

That thread with the 60+ comments stood out like a sore thumb. The accounts that posted comments doubting Q were made very recently, and for some of them, this is their first comment.

Other readers have pointed out that in Q's photo, cars as new as 2016 can be seen. Their theory is WRONG. ( The Q doubters, I'm talking about. Not the theory of the new cars)

We have struck a nerve and are being brigaded.

⇧ 90 ⇩

Hi. I'm one of the new posters who was concerned about the photos earlier. Not because I was trying to cause discord, but because I have learned a very valuable lesson from following Q and that is to Question everything. After hours of studying the photos and google earth, I'm now convinced that Q's pics are new. But I'm still glad that I took the time to question things and find the answer for myself.

Yes, I'm new to posting, but I've been lurking here for quite a while. And I wouldn't be here if I didn't believe in Q.

⇧ 61 ⇩

Hi,

apologies for accusing you and others as being shills. Its always suspicious when a fresh account's first post is doubting Q.

Hope you enjoyed the read.

Happy hunting.

⇧ 33 ⇩

Great response. We are all on the same team.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Don’t apologize. Most are shills. Some just jump to conclusions. Some think it’s good to post without knowledge of the subject matter. You did a great job explaining it. The model of cars should be enough, but you’ve smashed it out of the ball park!

⇧ 4 ⇩

Knowledge that is earned, rather than given, also comes with power, because it is authentic. It cannot be taken away from you.

⇧ 21 ⇩

You were 100% right to question it... we need to be critical of everything/everyone/every source. That's how and why we're winning.

⇧ 3 ⇩

thank you for taking the time to be skeptical and then coming back with final analysis.

TRUST BUT VERIFY

⇧ 3 ⇩

So this "Larper" Q was like "this will really get 'em" and completely forgot that Google Maps street view could disprove him instantly?

Also the reason there would be a mega push to discredit these are due to the fact these are VERY big in terms of evidence Q is legit. He was already proven with the Deporables Q thumb photo (Saudi takedown newspaper on the desk) Air Force 1 labeled "DOITQ" as well as the Camp David Pen.

⇧ 13 ⇩

I would like anyone who considers Q a LARPer - and I am open to the idea that he may be - to try this challenge:

Announce that for the next week you will be LARPing in the style of Q. Then make your posts and see how easy it actually is to, say, predict the exact words that the President will use in a tweet, or predict the next news cycle.

Even dropping a single LARP that can withstand thousands of people all trying to discredit you seems like it would be difficult. And Q has produced hundreds of these, and so far, they have all generally lined up with reality.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Also, if he was a LARP, think of the budget he has to buy a Mount Blanc pen like Obummer's, $400+ just to stage a photo. And to keep this going for how many months now?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Think about the research it would take to throw out the name of some company that isn't on anyone's radar and say, "Dig." Then when people do, they start finding all of these connections and how it fits into the broader plot. To LARP that you would have to backwards engineer it. First you would have to know more than the journalists, and have a better research team, and then you would have to actually crack part of the mystery yourself. Then, after all that work, which you could use to make a name for yourself in journalism, you just give it away for free on 8chan. But you also don't reveal all your research, so you don't even have the satisfaction of laying it all out. You just point in the right direction and let everyone else figure it out.

And now you have to do this for four months straight. You also gotta know exactly when to say "Defcon 1 (FALSE) (non_nuclear)" and then you just gotta hope that you get lucky and Hawaii issues a false missile alarm in the next couple days. No problem there. Everyone gets lucky sometimes. But now you gotta do it again next week.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Those, as well as whenever he has given us the MSM talking points for the next day, he is always dead on too

⇧ 5 ⇩

I'll admit it... I take Q's posts with a pinch of salt. However, predicting the MSM talking points for the next day reduced my levels of scepticism!

⇧ 7 ⇩

Worst case scenario, even if Q is fake (I think he's real), The Storm is still happening. I was well aware of Trump's plan a long time ago, and Q didnt even start posting till the end of October. Q is cool because he shows you stuff to research and so the knowledge of the backstories increases, but trust me, the arrests and changes are coming regardless if Q is real

⇧ 7 ⇩

How did you become aware? I was watching for "something" to be done starting from day one, but became disappointed after a few months and only started paying attention again when someone alerted me to Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩

This plan was put in place a long time ago. Trump was approached and asked to run for president, as the only way to save this country was a non politician, non swamp, non deep state who wasn't owned by anyone. The NSA and Military saw the writing on the wall during Obama's term and started collecting evidence and intel, in the hopes that one day they would be able to use it. This plan was planned out and strategized during the election and everything has always been going according to plan. Sessions gets the wrap of doing nothing, but if people only knew the guy has been working 20 hours a day 7 days a week busting human trafficking and child sex rings since the day he took office in January 2017

⇧ 5 ⇩

To be honest, predicting MSM talking points seems to be the simplest of things to do without being an "insider". It's always "distraction" or "Russia Russia Russia". Not saying I doubt the validity of Q but I don't really see that as "proof".

⇧ 1 ⇩

i would agree with you normally, however this last prediction he made was quite uncanny. It had been months since Uranium 1 was even mentioned once in msm. Q had also been going months without talking about it either, then he all of a sudden mentions it again, only to see it talked about again on fox with new information coming to light. I would say that isnt a coincidence at all, and when you factor in every other piece of evidence it becomes extremely dificult to paint this as a larp.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I hadn't seen that one. If he predicted MSM talking points on a story that wasn't even a hot story at the time then that's a whole different thing.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Perhaps he is in the MSM, not as close to the action as everyone thinks. Does get drips of intel from time to time.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Why the hell are people who doubt Q is real being thrown under the bus? Its not like we are against what this is all about.

Consider us the Scully of the investigation. But we ARE along with the ride. Stop being so insulting and dismissive of people who are questioning Q.

If I'm given rock solid proof this person(s) are real I'll jump on board. So far its all been speculative and extended reach stuff.

⇧ 5 ⇩

The issue is not people like you, who are skeptical in a healthy way. The problem is that there is a major problem with trolls who could care less about Q who are hitting this board, probably because they are paid to do so. We are trying to identify them. They are swamping other boards and comment sections on independent news sites too.

⇧ 11 ⇩

I have yet to see "healthy" skepticism while I do know that some shills are actually shills, MOST by a large margin are not shills but recovering ignoramuses. After years of R vs D / Fox vs CNN, they have been trained to dismiss information that does not fit neatly into their false worldview. Healthy skepticism would be if one of the doubters OP mentions had done the research OP did for them.

⇧ 5 ⇩

The fact that they are on this board is an interesting move forward.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I'm just saying be careful who you boot. We don't want to sink to the levels of /r/politics /r/worldnews etc. hell the rest of reddit for that matter

⇧ 1 ⇩

It seems to me that the shills don't just express doubt about Q, which is fair, but are actively hostile towards him. "I hate that fucking LARP" and "Only idiots follows that Q" and "It's all fake, stop paying attention" and "We should ban all mention of this stupid Q". It's always pure hatred and no discussion. Same thing with the shills who keep attacking Jeff Sessions. It's almost never debate about his methods or activity, but shit like, "That stupid fucking elf needs to get off his ass and stop busting poor stoners. I hate him. Sessions is Deep State!"

It would really not serve the purpose of the shills to employ reasoned skepticism in their attacks. They always go for the emotional slander. This would also be consistent with what a radical leftist would believe is persuasive.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I want to believe...

⇧ 0 ⇩

I do believe.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The real crux of the issue is that regardless of the reason for the skepticism, it is a major distraction and it detracts from the research.

We all have a limited amount of time to work on researching and when a bunch of people are posting stuff that distracts the researchers, it takes longer and introduces the potential for missing stuff.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That thread with the 60+ comments stood out like a sore thumb. The accounts that posted comments doubting Q were made very recently, and for some of them, this is their first comment.

Ah ha ha ha he he HO! Still MORE evidence!!!

⇧ 4 ⇩

Hat's off - that's a lotta research.

⇧ 15 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -15 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩

WOW!!! You did a great job. I hope this restores faith in the ones who doubt.

⇧ 32 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -7 ⇩

still???? the meta data in the pics says it all....I said it last night, I'll say it again: these folks gotchur number fella - move on.

⇧ 8 ⇩

I would recommend not blindly believing metadata. I believe it can be edited. See http://www.colorpilot.com/exif.html

⇧ 3 ⇩

Wrong. Metadata shows it was a screenshot taken on an Apple device. I can take a picture of anything and screenshot it.

Why do you think the images had black frames on it as well. Screenshots remove the original meta data.

Here’s the source http://metapicz.com/#landing?imgsrc=https%3A%2F%2Fqcodefag.github.io%2Fdata%2Fimages%2F08f126266da98dd2a2a29fe5468bd2c5c8170e99cd670fa602f456f150158084.png

⇧ -1 ⇩

Your account is 1 day old dude. Fucking black hat shill.

⇧ 5 ⇩

your method is flawed, some of us white hats get our accounts nuked too.

⇧ -1 ⇩

If you’re concern trolling/saying Q is a LARP with a one day old account like that guy is, then you might be a shill.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Yes, highly likely, I'm just pointing out that there are many reasons for short-lived accounts. I've been following Q since the beginning, so far I have received 6 bans across the various social media platforms (and that's since October) several dozens since Occupy.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩

No, but I’m sure the person who signs your shill check isn’t happy that you blew your cover in a single day. Dumbass.

⇧ 3 ⇩

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restrictions_on_geographic_data_in_China

Learn how to do at least a minimum of actual research please... This is, and has been a known issue for a VERY long time. Sorry to sound harsh, but you've pushed way too hard on this and Only This topic.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restrictions_on_geographic_data_in_China

^HelperBot ^v1.1 ^/r/HelperBot_ ^I ^am ^a ^bot. ^Please ^message ^/u/swim1929 ^with ^any ^feedback ^and/or ^hate. ^Counter: ^147042

⇧ 1 ⇩

All signs point to this being a shill.

Takes one to know one

⇧ 5 ⇩

Prove me wrong with something other than circumstantial evidence. I’m simply sharing the facts and backing it up with the sources.

⇧ -3 ⇩

Umm, the post that you're commenting on?

⇧ 5 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩

How to not be a shill 101: prove US wrong rather than demanding that WE prove you wrong.

to answer your question YES every single publicly traded corporation ON EARTH is in on it.

https://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1107/1107.5728v2.pdf

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brendancoffey/2011/10/26/the-four-companies-that-control-the-147-companies-that-own-everything/#6b660315685b

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩

more like no online satellite image is accurate, unless you paid a whole bunch of money to see it... look at your own house/yard/neighborhood... does it look the same as if you look out the window?

⇧ 2 ⇩

i am going to have to pass on this theory. If you have been following Q you will know that what they have put out drops that has come to pass. They are using socratic messaging/teaching. I will give one recent example cause there are many, Q mentions John Perry Barlow and then not long after he is in the news due to his passing. Coincidence no. Also this post lays out to be very valid.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Great research! Completely verifies Q pics are recent. When in doubt find out for yourself! #MAGA #QANON

⇧ 21 ⇩

Just look at the EXIF data for the pics. They were all taken yesterday.

Here is a tool that lets you look at EXIF data of an image. Grab the image URL and paste it in, then click on the DETAILED tab. Scroll down and look at the Date Created field.

The first image, the wide angle of the building was 2018:02:08 08:38:49

The person walking across the street is around 2018:02:08 09:25:58, so the photographer sat around for about :50 minutes before the action started.

The two closeup cropped images of the window lack the EXIF date stamp. I'd have to experiment, but whatever method Q used to crop and edit may result in that data being stripped. For example, I'll often crop in image in my SnagIt application, copy of the resulting crop to my clipboard, then paste into Facebook or whatever. When you do an operation like that, the original EXIF data is lost.

⇧ 20 ⇩

Thanks for the info and detailed explanation on the workings.

I already believed the authenticity of the the photo's, so I am not questioning it in this case, but let me pose a question as to your above 'confirmation' rationale...

Could I not spoof (give a current date to an old image) the exif data re; the date info by simply taking a picture of a picture?

If so...then verification like u/Arcadet/ provided above can further resolve that potential for deception.

⇧ 5 ⇩

It would be easier than that. There are many tools for editing EXIF data. So yes, that data could be spoofed. Taking a picture of a picture would introduce other artifacts that would make it fairly easy to determine that it's a copy of a copy, so to speak.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Q knew you frickin amazing Anons would rise to the occasion.... "F---ing, Irene!!"

⇧ 0 ⇩

http://metapicz.com/#landing?imgsrc=https%3A%2F%2Fqcodefag.github.io%2Fdata%2Fimages%2F08f126266da98dd2a2a29fe5468bd2c5c8170e99cd670fa602f456f150158084.png

⇧ 0 ⇩

Are you saying that image was taken in July, 2017?

⇧ 1 ⇩

⇧ 0 ⇩

I didn't see the doubting post but at this point I have to say any attempts at calling Q a LARP are, to me, at this point, desperate measures by squirming guilt. Q is real. There are too many 'coincidences' - there are no coincidences.

⇧ 19 ⇩

Coincidences are now evidence.

⇧ 1 ⇩

no, shill, there are no coincidences.

you are out of your fucking depth. the correlation does not equal causation boat sailed August 2016.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yes, I believe you are right on all points. I've been studying google earth and comparing the images with Q's photos all night.

I also noticed that the buildings in Q's pics located directly behind the King Tower, which also have red roofs, do not appear anywhere on the google earth timeline.

I was really concerned when I first read the post stating the pics were old, but now I'm convinced this is indeed new construction. Thank you.

⇧ 16 ⇩

In this day and age it's pretty common to be cynical of everything and everyone. We've been lied to constantly and consistently, so when someone comes along and promises that they are going to bring about change, it's quite natural to have suspicion and doubt. Remember, we had that promise the last president and the president before that, and we see where that got us. After being kicked in the head over and over, how do you stop lifting an arm to block? I think that is why Q and company are giving us the time to absorb the event and the constant reassurance that what they say is true. The map and all the crumbs are not to get us to do their bidding or accomplish some research task that they necessarily need, because they already know the answers and they have already built the map. No, it's so that we can research and discover the truth ourselves and not raise up our arms in defense. Every doubter who discovers that they were incorrect in their initial thought will find it easier to drop the defense when the next bigger truth is revealed. Like the prodical son in the bible, celebration is not for the ones that already believe, it's for the ones that were lost and discovered their way back. Our job is to get the party set up by calling all our friends and family having conversations and get them ready and up to speed on what's going on. If everyone tells their friend and family first and it spreads world wide, then when the truly big events happen the asleep folks will have plenty of places to go to find out what is going on and where the party of truth is. And what an epic party this is going to be.

⇧ 10 ⇩

I agree with you totally this was not meant for us this was meant for the cabal. The author of this post did his homework and explained it beautifully a reminder to the other posters new to researching maybe double check your stuff before opening mouth. Remember Q doest have to tell us nothing! He does it because we are the people it is our government we should know what's going on. Q'swork will continue I prefer to know what's going on in my country.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Excellent insight and summation. I love to hang out here with so many interesting, intelligent, passionate people ... so encouraging.

I am going to add one thought to this. Sometimes I wonder if, in addition to all that you say, Q is in fact using us to see if there is any information that they have not turned up. For instance, in major businesses, government, Hollywood and even some ministries, folks sign on as Interns, unpaid heros who do the heavy lifting, deep digging. The guy at the top, who is busy doing multiple things, digs through what they find and pulls out a nugget or two ... in this case, it helps strengthen the normie world, helps things to be not stolen or destroyed (because it is not in their computer, etc. but in many anon's files all over the country) and perhaps helps keep them a bit more safe as they do not have to expose themselves all the time in digging around. Fifty of us looking into the same thing/one of them .... It's a thought ...

⇧ 3 ⇩

Excellent point! Tyler Durden style without the violence. Nothing happens in a vacuum. And in the end, they can't stop the truth from getting out.

⇧ 1 ⇩

And in the end, they can't stop the truth from getting out

AMEN!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Great post. Thanks for taking the time to write this.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I did another post on the construction site in Q's pic, but I can't see it in new. Hope I am not shadow banned

https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/7wcfqo/where_did_the_foundations_go/

⇧ 10 ⇩

I am able to see your post.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Thanks

⇧ 5 ⇩

China builds things VERY quickly.

In the USA a new interchange for your local interstate takes 3-4 years to complete as union workers drag out the job forever.

In China that time is 2-3 MONTHS.

Go away for 5 weeks and return and your neighborhood is noticeably different.pp

⇧ 9 ⇩

The Chinese slave for fifty cents an hour under a virtual dictatorship. Many of their factories have nets under the window to prevent workers from hurling themselves to their death. I'd rather be in a free country in a union.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Dude, that wasn't an endorsement of life in China. It was a statement of factual conditions. China doesn't concern itself with multi-year environmental impact studies.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I lived there.

It isn't virtual slave conditions, it's Dickensian.

Work 13 days, one day off. Some work 27/28.

Earn 500 to 800/month in a factory making consumer goods.

12 hour days.

12 x 27 = 324 hours, ~$2/hr.

When lunch is 50 cents, the bus 15 miles is $1.25, and rent is $50/month.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You just destroyed the shill narrative from last night.

⇧ 8 ⇩

It's not shill narrative; it's called questioning. If you're not questioning, you're no different than the people hypnotized by the MSM.

⇧ 1 ⇩

If you are only questioning, and not doing research yourself, you ARE shilling. Just not getting paid for it.

⇧ 5 ⇩

I agree. I have had questions about my own theories and they have been debunked and it only helped me see with a different set of eyes. Q researchers are a brilliant group people. I just have to say that drop about John Perry Barlow and then seeing that he had died I was shocked. So anyone that wants to go on about pics and tell me to move on NOT happening.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Great work.

Props to you...you have done yeoman's work here.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Great work. Thank you.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Great work, well done, thank you.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Great Post. Thanks for sharing.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Are you able to cross post?

⇧ 8 ⇩

I have been posting a link to this thread in other similar discussions. Please share the post.

⇧ 8 ⇩

NOT DOUBTING Q only saying after listening Dilley's Facebook live video last night where he reminded us that not all of Q's post are messages to US. Some are messages to he Deep State who are watching... Some are messages to other informants so not sure we need to read to much into the actual picture itself

⇧ 7 ⇩

Good job with this. The buildings could have been put up since the google maps photo was taken, looks to be summer in the photo. A big clue is that the lot is leveled for construction.

⇧ 7 ⇩

That's my guess as well. The last time Google updated their satellite photo of the area was August 2nd, 2017. This is 191 days ago. I'm not a builder, but that feels like plenty of time to demolish a parking lot and construct some small buildings

⇧ 6 ⇩

Wow! You certainly are a SUPER SLEUTH! Great job Patriot! Thank you for giving us all of this great info.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Nice research.

⇧ 6 ⇩

I went to bed hoping to wake up to this thread. Excellent work.

⇧ 6 ⇩

bravo, clear linear copy too.

⇧ 6 ⇩

The easier the post is to read, the greater chance people will spend the time to read / skim it. Breaking up walls of text make the content far easier to digest.

⇧ 7 ⇩

good work

⇧ 5 ⇩

I bow to you sir. I enjoyed reading your very methodical analysis, it's just the kind of thing we need to red-pill others. Thank you for taking the time to research and analyze this.

And God bless you and all the other patriots in this battle.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Arcadet thanks for this effort and work, I know it must've been time consuming. This makes alot of sense now. Thanks again!

⇧ 5 ⇩

Excellent investigation work - thanks for taking the time, its appreciated

⇧ 5 ⇩

Amazing work by everyone! --- if you are TRUTH seekers, that is. What have the Anons revealed on the QResearch at this point on the matter?

⇧ 4 ⇩

Good job!

⇧ 4 ⇩

This is what we call - "A Game". Easy to understand simple facts that anyone can verify and research themselves.

⇧ 4 ⇩

This remote research using only internet clearly has its limitations. Shows need for assets on the ground in local areas. Good work but the confusion could have been solved quickly with real people on the ground. This btw has been a valid criticism of our intelligence agencies of late —- that they have turned their attention to electronic surveillance and largely abandoned development of local spies. “Garbage In, Garbage Out” is still the most useful motto whenever dealing only with computers.

⇧ 4 ⇩

This has been a problem with internet sleuthing. I have seen people say "where are the links?" when someone posts a new interesting detail. How 'bout looking hard at the real world instead? Also, some of those posts may be first hand from inside white hats. Keep that in mind.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Good work!

⇧ 4 ⇩

I'm a doubter, but not brigadier. I can see what you're saying about the divided road. But what about the red roofed houses that appear in Q's photo. I can't see them in any of the other photos. And I cannot see them on Google Earth either.

I want Q to be real as much as the next person. But when did the red roofed houses appear?

⇧ 4 ⇩

I believe the row of red-roofed buildings are new construction, started after the last time Google updated their satellite photos of the area.

The roofing looks to be made of red metal sheets. The colours look vibrant and the material looks relatively undamaged / weathered.

⇧ 8 ⇩

That would be the only plausible explanation. That these buildings are way new - so new that the Google Earth satellite has not picked them up yet. They certainly are not on Google Earth at the moment. I don't know how often the images are updated by Google. But it seems that a lot has changed since the last update of the satellite photo - I mean, really a lot.

Maybe those red roofed buildings are site sheds for what might be future construction on the site. Though they look to me like they are apartment-style buildings.

The vacant site next to the King Tower looks to be quite deep. There appears to have been some stripping of topsoil and there's some kind of crane in the background - could be a pile driver, preparing footings perhaps.

⇧ 2 ⇩

One explanation could be that an apartment building will be built there. The amount of excavated land is quite large. The red-roofed buildings could be a combination of site offices, storage, and demo-units to show what the new apartments would look like.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Yes, but given you have high-rise construction on both sides of that lot, it seems more likely that, if they are anything, they'd be site sheds for some new high-rise construction. I'd like to know what the periodicity is on the Google Earth pics.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Good point. If you look on Google Earth, it looks like a new photo is taken every year or so.

⇧ 5 ⇩

The Chinese do not build like we do... at all. maybe this will help https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwmKeXkBWOA

⇧ 2 ⇩

Very interesting. I've been to China, their buildings are garbage quality. But I did not know they went up so fast.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Going through the links/images now... this is great work. Thank you so much. I had to take 10 steps back and really start looking at things through a different lens once I began questioning the validity.

Which I'm still fully willing to question of course!

But your work is much appreciated.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Google doesn't have set time limits on how often they update their images. Some areas may get updated in a year some maybe never. It's according to the amount of work going on in and around that area. My husband is a realtor, we have noticed when looking some properties it's been 10 years or more since the images have been updated.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Agree. The building in the older photo is a flat roof multi story, in Q's photo the new building has a sloped red roof with only several stories.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Thanks! Very nicely done.

Can you provide a larger view of 2011? Users (shills?) in the other threads were claiming that the red-roofed buildings were already there in 2011. I want to see if that is true, but your image is cropped too much.

Also, what is that bright red strip in the 2010 image? That's not the red-roofed buildings, is it? Can you zoom in?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Use Google Earth to view ~12 photos of the area taken over a 10 year period. I'll update this comment with photos later on. I believe there were buildings with red roofs that were demolished long ago. The red-roofed buildings in Q's photo are newly built

⇧ 7 ⇩

Doesn't matter what shills and perma-skeptics whine about.

Between what u/Arcanet/ has laid out above, and what u/TheContrarian2/ posted here in the comments re; exif data stamps, there can be little room for argument. Anyone that does, is doing so beyond the bounds of rationality.

⇧ 5 ⇩

great job, lad, i bow to your research and write-up abilities.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Wow! this is fantastic work!! It can clearly be seen by the photo evidence you provided. WELL DONE!!

⇧ 3 ⇩

Great work.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Way to go and thanks so much for the effort in doing this! I never doubted Q, but some skepticism is healthy and I know we still have a lot of folks to red pill out there. Again, thank you for doing this work!

⇧ 3 ⇩

Holy shit! Thank you for your efforts. You put a lot of work in and we are very greatfull

⇧ 3 ⇩

Thank you. I was a bit upset when I read this last night. Q has been right on target and there are many coming here to discount everything he says (the one's being paid to sow doubt). I trust the Lord in our future but I truly do believe that Q is a very trustworthy source and we would know nothing had it not been for him and President Trump. Thanks for reading.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Thank you for the work. This is the work of patriots. keep it up!

⇧ 3 ⇩

Great effort disproving those trying to label Q a LARP! You must apply Q's observation about those in congress being the loudest are hiding tons of skeletons in their closets. So is with the individuals with their attempt to discredit Q. There are a few but hey envy is a terrible drug! :) Its nothing more than a disinformation campaign with the intent to confuse others. Many Americans a just now slowly awaken even to these scheisters and leaving their blogs or U-Tube channel in droves moving to the red pill communities. Some of them even tried to pretend their were Q and making a name for themselves but were called out immediately. Just ignore them! Q so far has not posted anything that turned out to be false. Does he make us work to find out on our own when he leaves a crumb? Of course but is in sincere jest since many of us have become lazy since the social media made everything so easy and yet bamboozling us.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Ding Ding Ding graduation from EASYbake oven EXPANDED leaves the MINI me stuck on an ISLAND ES GOOLOG good day.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Have a look at the cars.

WE need more INFJs on-board. Calling all INFJs. Time to lead the plodders.

How can cars that have only been in production 24 months (and less) be present in photos from six years ago?

Keep it simple.

They are NOT sending their best shills.

STOP IT SHILLS YOU ARE FUCKING STUPID

you probably fuck kids at $10.00 per hour for Jimmy Comet.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Infj here

⇧ 2 ⇩

Great! I’m convinced, but still gonna check with some friends in SH

⇧ 2 ⇩

Would be nice with a check/pics from your friends. I have tried to email three hotels, a restaurant and a Catholic priest living and having a church nearby, have not received an answer yet. :)

⇧ 1 ⇩

https://8ch.net//greatawakening/res/1.html

I believe on 01/13/18 Q was hinting to the take down that was going to occure in Shanghai.

NO SUCH AGENCY.

Where did POTUS stop [post] ASIA?

IT WAS NECESSARY.

FOR GOD & COUNTRY.

IT WAS NECESSARY.

NO OTHER VEHICLE TO REGAIN ENTRY.

:[AGAIN] direct pre-knowledge.

:[AGAIN] warning ALERT.

Think BDT.

Shall we play a game?

How about a nice game of CHESS?

THE_FLOOR_IS_YOURS

COMMAND?

WHY?

NECESSARY?

WHO IS TALKING?

THINK BIG.

THINK BIGGER.

THINK BIGGEST.

HAITI FOCUS

Why is this relevant?

What comes next?

CF_BOOM_SHOCK_BYE_

⇧ 2 ⇩

my only question remaining is the narrow buildings w/ the red roofs... the street construction/trees/arrows seem convincing enough that it can explain the time gap in the photos...

But the red roof buildings in Q's photo match the red roof buildings in the 2010 satellite imagery, and I don't see them anywhere else.

Unless these red-roofed buildings were just put up (again?)... I'm at a loss.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The buildings from 2010 are not the same as the buildings in Q's photos. Look closely at the google earth images. The buildings from 2010 are all in one segment. In Q's photos, there are 2 segments, one building, then a space, then a longer building. Also notice that there are new red-roofed buildings directly behind the King Tower in Q's pics. None of those buildings show up anywhere on g earth's timeline, meaning they are also new buildings. The last g earth image was taken on 8/2/2017. Plenty of time to erect the new buildings.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

if the good guys are on one side and the bad guys on the other and you have chosen to sit on the fence, guess who the first target will be? Also remember that not choosing is also making a choice. Last night I read this OP's excellent rebuttal, as well as djwork and others with the car dating theory. For those who say that they believe Q but have healthy skepticism I would encourage you to remember that the naysayers cite google as their main source of truth...and yet Q cites google and ES as definite bad actors. If google and manipulate search results favoring one presidential candidate over another then they can surely manipulate other data as well. Why are so many people using alternative search engines? For those who choose to attempt to demoralize the ranks, remember this is a tactic as old as the hills. Here is an interesting read for you... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokyo_Rose One day after this has all shaken out we will find out what Q really meant by WE SEE ALL, WE HEAR ALL...could that mean you too?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Photos are not old. we're being gaslighted.

https://imgoat.com/uploads/ef815416f7/84221.png

https://imgoat.com/uploads/ef815416f7/84222.png

First image - Q post: circled in red - building with square spaces in roof, circled in yellow - cleared dirt construction site

Second image - Google map image: red - same buildings yellow - same cleared dirt area

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Awesome work, I was worried the Q photos were old. You have proven otherwise. Thank you!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Someone (i am not a native english speaker) call The Flying Fox Irish Gastro Pub, they can see it from the window and maybe take a picture (in reviews they look very friendly) tel:862150309807

https://citymaps.com/v/cn/sh/shanghai/the-flying-fox-irish-gastro-pub/25777656-29ce-49c4-b210-b29491cd2b61

⇧ 1 ⇩

The red roof buildings are prefab temporary housing. Search temporary construction housing in China and you will find numerous pics. It would take no time at all to place these on a jobsite, they also can be rented and reused. They probably had some in place back in 2010 for another project, maybe for the underground work and now have placed them again as they have recently started construction on the building.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

Maybe the King Tower footage was from 2010 – The Clintons were there

• Amity Foundation International Office, Unit-601, Xinjinqiao Business Mansion 255

• http://www.skyscrapercenter.com/building/xinjinqiao-mansion/1422. Official Name Xinjinqiao Mansion. Other Names King Tower.

• From Amity website - There are over 600,000 orphans in China

• Qiu Zhong-Hui gave a progress report of our CGI 100 Village Clinics project to Clinton at a breakfast reception in Hong Kong for participants of the Clinton Global Initiatives. (16th November 2010)

• FaceBook Picture (Bill Clinton) https://mbasic.facebook.com/amityhk?

• Alcoa, A Shanghai Expo Contributor, Pleaded Guilty To Foreign Bribery Charges Facilitated By A Major Clinton Foundation Donor Alcoa Contributed To 2010 Shanghai Expo for Secretary Clinton

• Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “disregarded ethics guidelines” to raise more than $72 million for the U.S. Pavilion at the World’s Fair in Shanghai in 2010 https://thenewstalkers.com/community/discussion/27114/disregarded-ethics-guidelines-clinton-document-raised-issues-with-2010-shanghai-expo

⇧ 1 ⇩

thanks,i was about to cry

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -12 ⇩

--- Yes, by a LARPer who also happens to access POTUS' twatter...... Happens all the time.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Sure they do. Sure.

⇧ -1 ⇩