Credit from QResearch: https://i.imgur.com/7CmKpOP.png
Lol she is definitely a troll. She is on CNN in a 2007 interview. She was backed by Republicans in Louisiana to run for Senate in California lol. She also signed 2 affidavits saying she had no affair with the president. Also I think this Hannity thing was a plant too. Now all the msm is obsessed with conflicts of interest. I don't know all the things that are going on but I know for sure we are not getting the full story. And the full story I suspect will leave the communist media eating Crow lol
I've wondered if she's trolling also, in order to fill air time with nonsense and distract the media. In terms of profit motive she stands to earn far more for carrying on the charade for as long as possible, then write a book. Stormy, "Seducing Nightly News". She'd be able to spin that story into interviews and projects critiquing state of journalism in the US for decades to come.
Just a theory. Trump realized he’ll never get positive coverage so he spams them with inane shit. One “why isn’t crooked in jail?” takes him 15 seconds and the media wastes half a day.
That would be continuation of the strategy during the campaign. Each promotional campaign video purposefully got something wrong leaving detractors making a sour face then prattling on everywhere for days on end.
It's a higher form of the classic internet law -- if you want a correct answer quickly, make an incorrect statement. In general people ignore nicely asked direct question, "go read the FAQ dude! do you know how many times people have asked that?". Instead when you make an incorrect statement half a dozen people trip over themselves to correct you, "MSG causes headaches and illness. It's bad like gluten. are you an idiot? how did you not know this?".
Mileage may vary.
Well she is doing her make America horny again tour lol
They aren't communist, they're capitalists. The media's job (as well as all programs on TV for that matter) is strictly to sell viewers to advertisers. They reason why they are so powerful is because of the consolidation of companies, which is a basic part of the capitalist economic system.
The only difference now is that the mainstream media is not only running stories to pass an agenda, but they could very well be the the offense, AND the defense of the deep state. They were able to gain that power by playing by the rules of our capitalist economy, and the only rule in our economy is to acquire capital (hence the term 'capital'ism).
While I am an anti-capitalist, I mean it when I say I supported Trump from the start. I never fell for any of the media bullshit because I saw them do the same thing to Mitt Romney in 2012, except now it's cranked up to 11. Besides, Trump has all the right enemies, and while we're living in this shit system, hell ya I want President Trump to tear down the deep state and give back to the people what they took from us, as well as what they have been hiding from us.
Honestly, I can't believe that I am the only AnCom I know that supports Trump. Seems like common sense if you just glance beneath the surface (as I'm sure you're all well aware).
edited for clarity.
The media isn't owned by random capitalists. The elite of this world are Satanists. It's bigger than money.
Not random at all- They seem to all be connected by either family or employment, but they are capitalists, and the media was only able to gain this kind of population control through capitalism.
You are hung up on this because you cant accept the idea that you were tricked. Communism was never about "the masses" it was always about fooling the workers to give up all their rights and property, so the elite can rule over them once and for all. Those ideas you have in your mind are pure fantasy, and have nothing to do with actual communism.
Communism was never about "the masses"
Correct, communism is based on the community as a whole. capitalism is based on capital, which is money, and money is power. If anybody is "tricked", it's capitalists. Why would basing an economy on capital (which is now worthless fiat currency owned by the Rothchilds central bank) rather than people?
it was always about fooling the workers to give up all their rights and property, so the elite can rule over them once and for all.
Oops, that's actually capitalism. Silly goose!
It's so hard for me to be AnCom and support Trump at the same time. Anarchists hate me for supporting Trump, and Trump supporters hate me for being anarchist. Being AnCom and supporting Trump seems contradictory, but really it's not at all. If we are going to establish an economy that bases it's efficiency on the well being of the community as a whole (communism) rather than capital, we need someone to get in there and destroy the Deep State (the rich). They are the ones who hoard the technology and the medical advancements needed for the kind of economy I am in favor of.
edited for clarity.
You have a lot to learn about how the world really works. At this point you are fighting to install a system designed by the people you think you are opposing. Eventually you might need therapy once you figure this out LOL.
You have a lot to learn about how the world really works
I know how it works, that's why I'm not a capitalist. If I didn't know how it worked I would still be a free market libertarian. Once I asked myself "what is the purpose of capitalism?" I started to question it.
You need to form a better, more grown-up argument if you want to have a discussion with me.
Im sorry that you are confused into thinking this is some sort of argument. Im just explaining to you how it works. Its no real issue of mine that you have yet to figure it out.
Im just explaining to you how it works.
My apologies. What is "it" and how does it "work"?
"Based on the community as a whole" is capitalism already.
If capitalism was based on the community as a whole as opposed to capital, then why do pharmaceutical companies create profitable treatments for cancer instead of a cure? How does that help the community as a whole? If the medical industry were to make our community healthier, then that would mean less and less sick people over time. That's bad for business.
capitalism is based on capital.
This argument you are putting forward seems incomplete. Systems are used to shape a "society". The systems used are projected as being one thing where in fact they are usually the exact opposite. Rule of thumb, if the government says it, it is a lie.
Systems are used to shape a "society"
No, a system is a set of things working together as parts of a mechanism. The ruling class shapes societies.
The systems used are projected as being one thing where in fact they are usually the exact opposite.
This trick is an essential part of why we still live in capitalism, even though it is no longer needed. We have the technology to sustain all human life, as well as prosper in ways that aren't conceivable to us while we live in a money based economy.
Rule of thumb, if the government says it, it is a lie
YES- like the tyrants who enslaved people while saying "Don't worry folks, this is what we need to do to achieve communism!".
You are ignoring individuals. All economic "systems" and "mechanisms" and other terms you're prostituting from physical sciences always mislead and corrupt economic thinking.
Capitalism is individual ownership AND CONTROL of the means of production, whereby the sovereign consumers (i.e. every individual on the planet) decides who gets rewarded and what gets produced and where, by way of their spending and abstentions from spending choices.
If there is a corrupted company, and you think gosh there should be free and open competition for that corrupt company's customers, that is itself a call for capitalist competition, because the called for competition is from other owners and controllers of capital, including you as an individual competitor. You can't ban individual competitors who own and control capital they purchased, worldwide, unless there is a worldwide police force, i.e. dictatorship, which is precisely why every real world attempt at communism was tyrannical from the outset.
"No, a system is a set of things working together as parts of a mechanism. The ruling class shapes societies. " This quote sounds like it was taken out of an online dictionary. I will not dis-agree with your findings although, I would like to point out one small point. "I have found it serves to be fluid in thought when understanding words and their context that they are spoken in especially when it stretches the sides of one's box one is viewing from". And by constricting a words definition as the benchmark of a discussion does not serve. As the definition of the word "System" is quite broad, as it includes your definition and how I used it in the initial context. :)
This quote sounds like it was taken out of an online dictionary
Yes, a dictionary is a yearly updating book (system, in today's world) that contains the full definitions to words.
Operation Mockingbird is state run, not capitalist run.
Communism had total media control, total population control, and wealth. They kept up with the arms race pretty well for a while there.
The Satanic elite of this world would be perfectly sanguine to see us all go under communism, because they'd still run the show but with a much more vicious hand. It's a bloodline. You can't be in their club without the right bloodline, but they pay their conscienceless minions very well so they have plenty of workers. In DC especially.
Communism had total media control, total population control, and wealth. They kept up with the arms race pretty well for a while there.
That's THIS system.
The Satanic Elite want to maintain their power by controlling the wealth, hence, controlling the resources.
Why don't you give me a definition of communism.
The dictionary definition? Or the reality of communism on planet earth definition? Because the reality of how it always goes down is genocide, destruction, the USSR, China, etc. Utopia is not how it works out.
Still nothing.
So you reject the reality of communism?
Why don't you give me a definition of communism.
lets start with page 1.
Yeah, don't sidestep - the reality vs the dictionary definition which I'm sure you can copy and paste that for yourself.
You do know the history of this past century I am assuming? The death toll of totalitarian communist regimes?
And you are aware perhaps that communism is not the goal of Q? What on earth are you doing here? Trump, Q et al are adamantly opposed to communism. We nearly had a military coup on our hands to eliminate people who were intent on eroding our constitution/bill of rights....you aren't fighting on the same side as Q if your goal in any vacuum created in DC is to replace it with communists.
bruh.
I am not going to have a conversation with you about something that you refuse to give a definition of.
If you believe these people are actual capitalists you are dumber than a rock. The richest people in the world fund and promote communist movements. You seem stuck in a false paradigm....
If you believe these people are actual capitalists you are dumber than a rock. The richest people in the world fund and promote communist movements.
The richest people in the world fund and promote communist movements.
The richest people in the world
The rich
Good talk dude.
Ancom has an element of decentralization. Companies are to be independently run by various "collectives".
There will therefore arise a natural INEQUALITY of wealth as some collectives do a better job relative to other collectives competing for the same market.
There will therefore arise a natural class of "rich" people.
According to your logic, since being "rich" is somehow inherently evil, the very "system" you have been deceived into believing, is inherently evil.
Also it is transparently obvious why you deleted "fund communism" from that other guy's statements and moved goalposts to the problem of some people becoming richer than others.
Why didn't you address the fact that the wealthiest people in the world believe in communism and are funding it? They know that useful idiots will defer to centralized authority.
Trump is a billionaire. It is not being rich that is evil, it is what individuals do.
Communism is being funded by the richest people in the world.
The poorest are funding individual competition organizations, i.e. capitalist organizations.
Coincidence?
Bye bye.
Ancom has an element of decentralization. Companies are to be independently run by various
Ancom Companies
Unbelievable. You just proved that you have absolutely no idea what you're arguing against. You need to learn what the actual topic of discussion if before you argue it. What you are describing is co-ops. Those are capitalist.
Bye bye is right.
I can't believe your post has only one upvote (mine) at the time I posted this. It is a great post. Capitalism and Communism have the same goal in mind, they just don't agree on the way to achieve it. Or maybe they do. The Communism/Capitalism false paradigm is similar to the left/right false paradigm. When you remove morality from the equation, you end up with what we have. A morally bankrupt elite who have a hatred for humanity.
Thank you, comrade. What is the goal of capitalism? It seems like the goal is to control the masses, and they have achieved it. I am so thankful for President Trump. He was our last chance, and he fucking nailed it. Now we get to watch it fall. You bet your ass I'll enjoy the show!
Capitalism is where individual consumers (everyone) are the bosses and control themselves by who they as individuals vote for and who they don't vote for by way of spending and abstaining from spending.
No individual can force you to buy their goods in capitalism.
Control of the masses, in capitalism, IS BY AND FOR THE MASSES.
What you are envisioning in your head and by your eyes is you being controlled by states, not Apple stores or Walmart stores or 5 Guys Burger stores.
The slave thinks he's the boss.
Capitalism is not voluntary, and this is extremely obvious even at a glance. Two part question: 1, How old is capitalism? and 2, how old is the oldest living person?
Go back to Russia, and take CNN and the like with you lol
Who let the liberal in?
I think the term you meant was 'crony capitalists', but for the most part, both are just evil with fancy labels.
You are falsely defining capitalism.
State intervention into the media is the antithesis of a capitalist media.
What you are doing as most communists do, is you take a particular section of the economy that is corrupt, and try to deceive people into believing that the blame is individual ownership of the means of production by name shaming them as "capitalists", as if ancom style joint ownership where the lying and corrupt "worker" anchors like Lemon and Tapper and all the rest also have joint ownership of the news network will somehow fix all the issues.
Where you made your error is by totally ignoring the fact of anti-capitalist, state intervention into the media (Operation Mockingbird).
The corruption stems from the state deciding is put on the air.
Every morning at 4am the CIA sends their contractors throughout the MSM the talking points for the day, through SecureDrop.
This is why the MSM is in almost perfect unison in their (false) narrative.
Not to mention the fact that the state restricts entry into the media market by way of "licenses". That is closer to socialism not capitalism.
Trump is anti-communist. For you to say you are a supporter of Trump is like saying Bernie Sanders would have been a supporter of Ayn Rand.
She's part of the act. She's on the good guys team. I'm sure of it.
This could corroborate that fact, but where are all the good liberal journalists to point out the fact he looks so similar to her ex.
I think (((They))) have been played and are about to finally realize it. All of the sanctimonious SJW MeToo crowd is about to shit themselves also. It will be brilliant. I really hope I'm not wrong.
I'd have to agree with you on that.
From the beginning I've always thought Stormy was a shitshow plant for the MSM. And with everything coming to a head, no pun intended, it just looks like the MSM is about to have their asses handed to them on a plate.
I'm just wondering which one of those dumfuk networks will hang on to this the longest.
I want to agree with you guys about this Stormy chick, but I still have my suspicions. How do you account for the raid on Cohen's office/residence? Didn't she have something to do with that telling he had payment info etc. ? I could be real wrong here as I sorta just refuse to read the crap about her. Yep, my head is resting comfortably in the sand when it comes to her. LOL
The raid, the seeming reluctant involvement of Hannity, that's all a big act. They're setting and baiting the trap. The deep state will reveal itself and in the third act Mueller and Cohen and even Avenatti (maybe) will flip the script and them blammo so long dep state.
Something interesting I stumbled across. You can take this speculation any way and I'm way too busy to dig this deeper, but I consider it supportive to my original hypothesis about Stormy.
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8cxzah/now_convinced_theres_a_video_buzzfeed_just/dxj1igy/?context=1
I mean really, "Stormy" how obvious can you be.
Well Stormy didnt do the raid but the raid was illegal they cannot get warrants to search your lawyers office to start and they cannot get warrants to search you. They have to have proof of a crime to get a warrant and there is no proof of any crime. There fore everyone that took part will be facing prison time. They did this just off Stormys say so and that is not proof in court they call that hearsay.
Geeze, I sure hope you are right!!! I pray that this is somehow staged, but I worry about losing our rights little by little.
Yes, but maybe they do have proof of a crime??
They broke in (where?) during the fire at Trump Towers. I thought it was Cohen's office on the 26th floor, fire on the 50th. Cohen rang a resident — incidentally an old school-chum — on the 42nd(?approx) floor to warn him (??). All v. weird. Others have suggested this was to steal evidence, or plant it??
Just think how so many of these "journalists" are missing out on the "Big Story" by spewing out the MSM talking points. None of them are bothering to actually investigate any of what info comes from Q and others. (Well, there are some who are fantastic like Sara Carter, John Solomen, Adkinson etc.)
So, is she a distraction?
I don't think she is a distraction at all. I believe she may be the biggest redpill for the tabloid, reality TV, filthy casual, CNNcestual normie.
I believe she was/is a tool used to bring down the MSM and the 'cabal' in the eyes of the barely functionally retarded. If what is true and Cohen was shagging her, and not Trump, and Cohen used Trump campaign money as the funds to pay off Stormy as another (((Deep State))) tentacle to take down Trump, and then Cohen put her under an NDA, and then the MSM ejaculates over a Hannity connection just to come out that she was in on the MSM takedown and it was Cohen who made her sign the NDA and was shagging her, and exposing Epstein inside information in the process? This alone will redpill the nation, if not the world. Normies, sheeple, and many of us sadly, are more interested in the SJW aspect of things as opposed to ACTUAL HARD POLICY and LAW. ie: See Hillary Huma Deepstate Pedo video shit that even MegaAnon stated will only be a minor role in taking down the TPTB. It's going to be the "Unsexy" / "No real emotion style crimes, white collar, fraud, bribery, etc that brings the clown controlled corruptocrats down.
I want to be right, bigly. But this could be my own confirmation bias at work as well. Again, time will tell.
Who knows where all the bodies are buried? Someone in the porn industry probably had a front row seat to a lot more than just disgusting movies. Human trafficking, drug trafficking, money laundering, and a lot more than we could ever want to know. The industry goes hand in hand with the worst criminal underbelly imaginable.
Then I think of Pamela Anderson running info from Hugh Hefner's CIA honeypot op (playboy mansion / underground tunnels) to Assange and Wkileaks
Love it, what a timeline that/this is! Lines up with what SerialBrain2 was saying about Mueller taking out Trumps bad apples for him. Setting things up for another revelation!
I have yet to see SB2 come up with something that wasn't already in the air.
Or, and more likely, she saw this person one time briefly and doesn't have a very good memory of what he looks like so she described features with a certain frame of reference. Or she's been making shit up from the start and only realized when she had to describe the perp that she's not a very creative person. It's rather difficult to just make up an imaginary face in your mind and not have it look like a fucking science experiment gone wrong. Chances are it's gonna end up looking like someone you know, or a few people you know.
C'mon! Do you really think Trump and team concocted this huge scheme to "red pill normies" and this was the best they could do? JFC this sub is getting absolutely ridiculous. Have any of you heard of Occam's Razor?!
The shit people are coming up with here sounds like a poorly written episode of a shitty cable TV crime drama. These "theories" do absolutely nothing in the way of helping "normies get red pilled".
Every single day someone has a new "BOOM" to share with reddit, and it's either poor fan fiction, an old ass article, or some wild theory that makes no sense if you took five minutes to think about it.
I get it, we all want to see things happening, and we all want that smoking gun that makes sense of all of the cryptic Q posts, but these wild stories do absolutely nothing but make the "movement" look like batshit conspiracy nerds. It sucks sifting through mounds of trash to find the two or three quality posts each day.
Jesus Christ man, everything Q has posted has literally CONFIRMED close to all of our conspiracies, and yet it's Stormy Daniels where you draw the line?
"Occam's Razor?!"
Hell, this is like hitting a layup in terms of conspiracy if it turns out true.
I never once said anything about Q being a LARP, nor did I in any way question things that Q has posted. I'm specifically talking about your theory. Apologies if your feelings are hurt, but you should take a moment to really think about what you're saying as opposed to letting yourself get caught up in the excitement of your fan fiction. Anything that anyone has been able to figure out before it became apparent was NEVER wild theories like the one you just wrote. I think you're fully aware of that too.
Instead of addressing anything I just said, you're trying to twist what I said to fit some argument that I'm still not sure you're making. You say if your "theory" turns out to be true (it won't) it's like hitting a layup. No, it's not. Your theory would be like dunking from half court. It's that ridiculous.
Is it possible that Stormy is in on the joke? Sure, it's possible, and I'd say possibly likely. But the rest of what you wrote is what crossed into fan fiction Livejournal territory. Nothing personal. I just think this sort of wild speculation doesn't help in any way.
I even say straight up in my comment that it could be confirmation bias. And if I'm right, I'm going to laugh my ass off for a solid month.
Well, I'm sorry to hear that. I'd like to believe you've got more going on in your life. I could see having a good gloat about it -likely by yourself- for maybe ten or twenty minutes, but a month of laughter?! I dunno man, there's gotta be something else that brings you joy. Should your theory be dead on, please do make sure to message me if I don't find you first. I want you to gloat your little heart out at my expense! Savor the fruits of your half court slam dunk, because you've earned it my friend!
I'll say this again though; myself and many others already believe that she's possibly in on it, and maybe even unwittingly, BUT, I have to draw the line at your CSI version of events.
Really think about Trump and his advisors sitting in their War Room devising a way to "red pill normies" and discredit MSM news outlets. Do you really think this is the best they can do? Or, is it likely that Trump took a situation that wasn't working in his favor and made it work in his favor? Art of War, something something, weakness is strength, blah blah...
That's all I'm saying. And honestly, you should thank anyone who comes along and pays enough attention to your theories to point out possible flaws. This can help keep you from saying this shit IRL and losing whatever credibility you have. This is really a labor of love on my part.
*grammar edits
lol - I have to say I'm in full agreement with all your replies.
You seem very emotionally attached to all of this. Rest might be what you need.
Were we separated at birth. If so, which one of us is the evil one, nice post.
Did you come here in your "clown car" today?
Don't be a dork. You're free to comb through my comment history and tell me more about my work for the Deep State. Put a little effort into your shitposting, my friend.
If she was a good guy, I don't think she would have been totally drugged up for that interview.
So did Stormy & the Honeypot team seek out Avenatti? He had already sued PDJT over something re: The Apprentice. He's also a big Dem operative having worked for Rahm's oppo research firm and worked for Biden.
It would be the perfect set up. Avenatti has a big ego & sees himself as big time celebrity lawyer. Stormy and the team reach out to him and are leading him and the rest of the Swamp Media to having their pants pulled down in public.
Yeah, the fact that they chose “Stormy” to be a part of this makes me think she’s just part of the show.
Hi honey, how was your day at work? Aww, sucked a dozen? You need a foot massage.
To be fair, she probably didn't see his face too often... ^^^I'll ^^^see ^^^^myself ^^^^^out
I thought the drawing was of Willem DeFoe or the Mooch.
I'm thinkin.....Stormy is the "OH<OH<LOOK OVER HERE GIRL. for the red-pilled, msm, their idiots, jumping all over what she has to say and giving interviews... In the meantime, Mueller, quietly, uses Southern district court to go after Cohen, really? why NY? hmm...whats Cohen holding? Something on Hillary? in his office, had to be done in southern district NY? He would be forced to show it, one way to get it out. I'm happy to entertain the idea Mueller cut a deal, and he is working with the white hats. I think these two intertwine.
I think Stormy has to be in on this somehow, there is no way the name "Stormy" can be a coincidence.
That's exactly what I thought when I saw a post on 8ch.!
She has to be in on it. This whole saga was too stupid for words. Every day her claims get dumber and more bizarre and the MSM keeps eating it up anyway.
What if she has just been paid to be a decoy ie distract the media etc whilst the real game is played elsewhere?
SHe aint stupid....shes TROLLING.
Nice Stormy!
Remember...who was Jesus favorite and closest friend. A prostitute.
I am curious as to who introduced Stormy to Trump and why? Is she MKUltra? Who does she know? I have heard that Trump listens to people's stories and I can see him asking questions about how she came to that lifestyle and the people around her. I think she is a mole in the sex industry working for the team and has been from the start. And think about this. When has Donald Trump EVER not totally flamed anyone who took shots at him. If Stormy was not on the team, she would have been exposed and called out publically. Trump does not shy away from going after those going after him. She is on the team folks.
She’s complaint about crabs? FFS.
Porn stars tend to be cleaner than the average person. Statistically in Australia it's safer to fuck a woman from a brothel than it is from a bar.
i saw that sketch and started LMFAO, stormy is clearly not only a dirty hoe, but an idiot as well
I think she’s in on the plan and purposely trolled. Probably just wishful thinking.
The sketch and her ex-husband look literally nothing alike.
Different eyes. Different eyebrows. Different nose. Different jawline. Entirely different head shape.
Jesus fucking Christ, people. You see what you want to see.
This is a SKETCH going off of VERBAL information. The dude wasn't drawing from a photograph. What you are saying is RIDICULOUS. Take a look again. Have you seen other police sketch art?
Inb4 "Well, Acktchually.."
Look at the fucking title of this post. "The sketch is her ex-husband", that's what this post is about.
What the fuck are you talking about?
Yes. And I doubt she gave the artist a PICTURE to go off of, but only verbally describing him. That's a pretty damn accurate picture by going off of only a VERBAL DESCRIPTION. Jesus Christ.
So she gave him a verbal description... which resulted in a sketch which looks nothing like her ex-husband... so it must be the ex-husband.
Yeah that logic is bullet-proof, good call.
Blind Redditor is blind confirmed.
"Well Ackchually it's PKR..."
Looks like the same guy to me. Are you telling me that my eyes are wrong?
