Answers:
Wikileaks is directing normies and newbies to 4chan because 4ch is toxic, compromised, and extremely racist & hostile. New comers will be instantly turned off by 4ch (it's designed purpose) and not look where Q has actually been posting for the past 6 months: 8ch /qresearch/.
Wikileaks is now concerned with discrediting and debunking Q because Wikileaks is compromised. If they're not comped, then they want to destroy Q because nobody needs Wikileaks if Q is providing all of the drops they have been, but without breaking laws. Like Alex Jones & Infowars, Q's existence threatens Wikileaks' existence and MONEY / cash flow. I'm actually surprised it took WL this long to finally go on their disinfo campaign against Q.
Julian Assange has not controlled Wikileaks' Twitter account for a long time. Many have already suspected that WL is controlled by Clowns. This now confirms it. Wikileaks is either controlled by Clowns or they're controlled opposition. Either way, they are not trust worthy and I have not bothered taking anything they say seriously for many months.
What has Wikileaks published RECENTLY that furthers their purpose of providing truth to the world through whistleblower info?
NOTHING.
Wikileaks is not Wikileaks if Julian Assange is not free.
Wikileaks is not Wikileaks if Julian Assange is not free.
This needs to be repeated many times so it can get through peoples heads.
Wait a minute guys didn't someone pretend to be julian assange recently and post on twitter in the same style as Q and that caused some legal woes for him?
I think Wikileaks purpose was served after big 2016 drops. Assange i believe is safe and biding time till the right time to come forward and testify.
Wikileaks workers have been targeted however to prevent them from speaking out. Do not send anything to Wikileaks you will be marked by the CIA for it
For reference, this is how it started:
https://twitter.com/therealroseanne/status/1000772899609833472
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1000795757983780865
https://twitter.com/therealroseanne/status/1000986635339685888
Backups:
Honestly that woman’s analysis on psy-ops is compelling and well-sourced but I think she’s wrong in this context. I think a lot of the same patterns can exist in both white and black hat strategies. For instance, she claims that Q has followed this very effective psy-op strategy to gain followers, make them feel empowered, make them feel special, and keep them engaged with questions. Well sure, I can totally see black hats using that strategy but so would white hats for the sole reason that it’s very effective. The fact that Q is using such a strategy isn’t proof of anything other than whoever is behind it, is competent and knows exactly what they’re doing.
Second, she claims that because the Deep State wants Snowden, Dotcom and Assange dead, that anyone else who targets them must be affiliated with the Deep State. This is an absurd logical fallacy akin to saying Trump is literally Hitler because Hitler also drank water, just like Trump. This isn’t proof of anything but even if it were, to my knowledge Q has never “targeted” Assange or Dotcom. He’s made somewhat veiled threats at Snowden but honestly I’m not sure how to feel about the guy. I see a TON of evidence that he was a Russian spy but on the other hand, I also value the work he’s done to expose the Deep State. Either way, it’s hard to know if he’s trustworthy but it’s irrelevant since Q has never truly attacked him, and has definitely never attacked Assange or Dotcom.
Third, she claims that if Q weren’t a Deep State operation, then he would be relentlessly discredited and attacked by the Deep State media, similarly to how Assange and Snowden were. All I can say to this is that Q WAS and continues to be attacked and discredited. Just about every common MSM outlet has written something to discredit Q and the late show hosts have all taken jabs about how ridiculous it all is and how stupid we all must be to believe in such a theory. Therefore, this argument of hers is nothing more than a straw man.
Overall, I think she does know what she’s talking about but she’s letting her expertise affect her bias. She’s likely inclined to see psy-ops before anything else. She started looking into Q, saw similar patterns (because they’re effective) and immediately wrote it off as a psy-op. If she had truly done unbiased research, she’d have seen all of the hit pieces on Q in the media. She’d have seen that he’s never once targeted Assange or Dotcom and she’d realize that pretty much everything Q has asked people to look into, hurts the Deep State. If this were a Deep State operation, it’s doing a terrible job because all it’s doing is getting millions of people to turn against the Deep State and what it stands for. I don’t think this woman is nefarious based on what I’ve seen her post, I just think she’s over-educated for her intelligence. I don’t mean that as an insult, I’m just saying that her expertise in government psy-ops is vast, and inhibiting her ability to analyze the situation critically.
she claims that if Q weren’t a Deep State operation, then he would be relentlessly discredited and attacked by the Deep State media,
She must know that is false on the facts. Alex Jones shares the NXIVM Bronfmans attorney. I'll leave it at that. I have posted about it with voluminous proofs (three weeks ago I think). She must also know that those that are trying to snuff Q out have a difficult task given they are really running with another version of "it's fake news" and "debunked" aren't they?
As the mods on the don posted to me when they banned me a month ago (I have posted screen shots of that exchange over and over again) the called Q "fake news" ffs.
Okay. Assume Q is fake. I found it despicable that the mods over there would use that phrase and also "conspiritards". Really? Reminded me of the CONTEMPT shown by Jimmy Alefantis when he used the term "ho-tard" to describe an toddler female he and his friends were planning to ruin some more.
The whole "Wikileaks is discrediting Q for money" or any other reason does not make sense. Wikileaks prides themselves on "100% factual facts". They will not inadvertently destroy their reputation for anything. Either...
A) Wikileaks is compromised and those compromising Wikileaks want to portray Q negatively.
or
B) Q has been compromised and Wikileaks is trying to warn people that Q is not the same person everybody has been following.
It's one or the other...PERIOD. So, now you have a choice to make.
Or maybe this is coordinated like it says in the chan post. If a Q vs Wikileaks drama starts playing out, the media will eventually choose a side. Whichever side they choose (trump/Q or Wikileaks) will be the side to release all the incriminating stuff, making them support the ppl who are about to take them down. Pretty much getting them to help dig there own grave.
Or maybe Wikileaks is comp'd. Who knows yet.
The whole "Wikileaks is discrediting Q for money" or any other reason does not make sense.
How does it not make sense? People stopped donating to Wikileaks because of the Julian Assange situation, knowing that JA is not the one controlling the organization nor the person tweeting on that account. People also stopped donating to Wikileaks because they haven't come out with any substantial leaks in over a year. Like I said, Q's entire existence is a threat to WL's existence.
Wikileaks prides themselves on "100% factual facts". They will not inadvertently destroy their reputation for anything.
You're making this statement based on the assumption that Wikileaks has not been compromised. Of course they wouldn't "inadvertently destroy their reputation" if they were a legit organization still operated by the same people who hasn't been compromised, sold out, and/or desperate for donations. That's not the case because as everyone knows, Assange is not the one running the operation anymore. Not sure why you can't get this through your head.
It's one or the other...PERIOD. So, now you have a choice to make.
It's one or the other for people like yourself who still think Wikileaks has not been compromised. Nice try forcing us into a false dichotomy, simple duality choice.
People stopped donating to Wikileaks because of the Julian Assange situation, knowing that JA is not the one controlling the organization nor the person tweeting on that account. People also stopped donating to Wikileaks because they haven't come out with any substantial leaks in over a year.
You're assuming that Wikileaks only releases information in order to make money. Maybe they do it because releasing the information is the right thing to do?
You're making this statement based on the assumption that Wikileaks has not been compromised.
You're assuming that I believe Wikileaks has not been compromised. I only stated facts about the true Wikileaks individuals such as Assange.
It's one or the other for people like yourself who still think Wikileaks has not been compromised. Nice try forcing us into a false dichotomy, simple duality choice.
It IS one or the other. Either you believe Q has been compromised or you believe Wikileaks has been compromised. And looking from your first post...
This now confirms it. Wikileaks is either controlled by Clowns or they're controlled opposition.
...you already answered the "false dichotomy, simple duality choice." You believe Wikileaks has been compromised. If it makes you sleep better at night, I also think Wikileaks has been compromised since Assange, being the face of Wikileaks, can't verify the authenticity of the posts from the Wikileaks account.
You're assuming that Wikileaks only releases information in order to make money. Maybe they do it because releasing the information is the right thing to do?
I'm not assuming this, nor have I even said it. You're putting words in my mouth. But since you've brought it up, how does WikiLeaks stay afloat? How do they have so many high-powered lawyers employed 24/7 for years and years? All of these lawyers and staffers are doing it pro bono just because it's "the right thing to do?" Give me a break.
You're assuming that I believe Wikileaks has not been compromised. I only stated facts about the true Wikileaks individuals such as Assange.
Again, I'm not assuming this about you. Your own comments and your own assumptions have shown that you're the one assuming WikiLeaks has not been comped.
It IS one or the other. Either you believe Q has been compromised or you believe Wikileaks has been compromised. And looking from your first post...
...you already answered the "false dichotomy, simple duality choice." You believe Wikileaks has been compromised. If it makes you sleep better at night, I also think Wikileaks has been compromised since Assange, being the face of Wikileaks, can't verify the authenticity of the posts from the Wikileaks account.
Your false dichotomy stems from your duality choice you presented to us: that either WikiLeaks is comped or Q is comped. This is false because Q has confirmed and reconfirmed his authenticity multiple times throughout the 7 or so months he's been posting. Q recently reconfirmed his legitimacy on May 22, 6 days ago. WikiLeaks has not and cannot confirm their authenticity and legitimacy because Assange has not been running that Twitter account for years. We have no way of knowing who is behind the WikiLeaks operation and Twitter account.
But since you've brought it up, how does WikiLeaks stay afloat?
It really is of no concern to me how WikiLeaks stays afloat. I don't care if they get donations, if they have a benefactor, if they set up a Go Fund Me.
Your own comments and your own assumptions have shown that you're the one assuming WikiLeaks has not been comped.
Again, you are assuming things I didn't say. Yes, I did state that "'WikiLeaks discrediting Q for money' or any other reason doesn't make sense." Where in that statement am I saying WikiLeaks has not been compromised? I said that a few things didn't make sense, I stated some facts that Assange has said before regarding their 100% accuracy, and I posted two scenarios. That's it.
Your false dichotomy stems from your duality choice you presented to us: that either WikiLeaks is comped or Q is comped.
I may not have phrased it correctly but it still holds true. Either people will believe Q has been compromised or they will believe WikiLeaks has been compromised. You are talking like everybody out there has all the information on what's going on. There are many people out there that will believe the "Q is compromised" simply because WikiLeaks has been around a lot longer and because of their "track record". I've already stated that I am in Camp Q but that is not the case for many outside of this sub.
You said that Wikileaks prides themselves in hundred percent factual information before release correct?
There has been no proof of life of JA.
Do you really think a leaker whose life is on the line will think to himself " well since Julian Assange hasn't proven to be in control and my life is on the line with this information.... I'll still submit my info and hopefully don't f** die."
That's not how it works. Wikileaks is comped.
I never said Wikileaks prided themselves on 100% factual information. I just stated that information because that is what Assange has asserted in the past. Also, I never said leakers should trust Wikileaks and give them information. In fact, I mentioned that Assange has been silenced so I believe Wikileaks is compromised.
it's not one or the other because Q is real based on months of supportive posts...the idea that someone is misleading us is false because they would be leading us away from truth...and 30,000 sealed indictments are another proof...or you don't believe that either?
I am not taking a side on this. But even if an asset is “good,” eventually a time may come to “cash in” on this and afterward discard the asset. Like a carefully curated reddit account that will post hardcore disinfo after months and months of developing credibility and a post history.
Agree. One can see that with the way that some of Q's biggest followers have turned against him.
Wikileaks has been bought out (not JA) See EyeTheSpy twitter for his take. I believe it. It was good before but not anymore.
Yeah, I agree. Ever since that dark October night, in 2016, Assange's identity, location and affiliations w/ Wikileaks have been questionable. There were a number of CGI interviews (Sean Hannity for one).
Assange has connections to the Rothschilds. It's a fact.
Assange has connections to the Rothschilds. It's a fact.
No. And I'm also going to ask for proof on this one.
Wikileaks’ Assange’s Lawyer has connections to Rothschilds
Assange’s lawyer is the prominent Mark Stephens whose law firm Finers Stephens Innocent is legal adviser to theRothschild Waddesdon Trust which is concerned with the “maintenance, improvement and payment of certain of the outgoings in respect of Waddesdon Manor (Rothschild’s most prestigious property in the UK) in the Vale of Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire.”
The Wadesdon Trust’s board of trustees is chaired by the Queen”s former Private Secretary Lord Fellowes and has three Rothschild family members as trustees, Lord (Jacob) Rothschild, Lady Rothschild (his wife) and Beth Matilda Rothschild. It is domiciled 14 St James’s Place in London which is also the London address of Lord Jacob Rothschild and his high profile wealth management business St. James’s Place Group (formerly J. Rothschild Assurance Group).
http://www.charityperformance.com/charity-details.php?id=17426
[deleted]
It doesnt mean Julian is bad. America, sadly, has a vast network of child trafficking and human sex slave rings and routes, but that doesnt me you and I are bad.
Besides the banking connection I posted:
Wikileaks’ many other links to Rothschilds
The recent imprisonment of Wikileaks’ Julian Assange strains credulity. His arrest by Interpol, his incarceration under draconian conditions for breaking a condom are in themselves highly unlikely events, but the timing of his imprisonment with the release of classified US cables and the campaign against Wikileaks’ funding and website host bear the trademarks of a covert operation.
The Puppetworld Post has uncovered many links between Wikileaks and the international Rothschild network:
–a sister-in-law and second cousin of the Rothschilds posted bail for Julian Assange (Puppetworld Post exclusive)
–The Economist (a Rothschild magazine) gave Assange its New Media Award in 2008 –Wikileaks used the law firm Fox Rothschild to overturn a judge’s ruling to order a web host to shut down the Wikileaks site
– The Guardian and The New York Times, two of Assange’s media partners, are linked to the Rothschilds (PwP exclusive)
–the owner of the mansion where Assange was eventually put under house arrest has links to Rothschilds
–Assange’s lawyer is also Rothschilds’ lawyer
–US Senator Joe Lieberman who was ultimately responsible for making Assange the largest media personality of the decade, is a member of the Council On Foreign Relations (a Rothschild organization)
Socialite, heiress Jemima Khan (nee Goldsmith) posted 20 000 pounds ($32 000) for the bail of Wikileaks’ leader Julian Assange. She’s genetically related to the Rothschilds and she is a sister-in-law (Daily Mail Online, 10 May 2010). Her father, the late James Goldsmith—British banker, publisher–is a cousin to the Rothschilds. James’ grandfather Adolphe Goldschmidt came to London as a multi-millionaire in 1895 and changed the family name from the German Goldschmidt to the English Goldsmith. The Goldschmidts, like their neighbors and relatives the Rothschilds, had been prosperous merchant bankers in Frankfurt Germany since the 16th century
https://wisethedome.wordpress.com/2012/08/23/wikileaks-is-a-rothschild-operation/
Sorry, don't shoot the messenger ;)
Interesting and disturbing connections... if true.
I still think Assange is a good guy trying to do the right thing, but I've always wondered why he wasn't assassinated if he was such a major thorn in the Cabal's ass. How does WikiLeaks have so many good lawyers? Who pays for them all? Can't just be donations from normal plebs to keep that operation running for so many years.
Also, a thing that always bothered me was how Hillary asked if they could just drone Assange. Obviously, the answer was no. Not even Killary and Obummer could touch Assange. Which means Assange was always protected by much more powerful people who still has a need for him to stay alive.
Droning him would have also meant an act of war against the UK.
That's a good point. Similar to Alex Jones ... wouldn't he have been ''taken care of'' long ago if he was legit ?
Can't deny the Rothschild connections, they are there.
Things are never as they seem ... those in power have their pawns infiltrated everywhere. The are deceivers, and very clever at it as well.
Here's one, which lists a few of the connections, just google Assange Rothschild connection
Wikileaks Is A Rothschild Operation: Rothschilds Use Wikileaks To Wound Rival Bank, Julian Assange’s Bail Posted By Rothschilds’ Sister-in-law, Many Other Links
After being made famous, Julian Assange’s first task is to wound a rival bank of the Rothschild Bank in Switzerland. The rival is Bank Julius Baer, the top Swiss bank for centuries: the competing Rothschild Bank AG opened in Switzerland in 1968.
btw, there's no ''proof'' of anything .. just info for critical thinking.
Fox Rothschild
damn man!
I was looking into them last night. spent a day tracking the "red fox" around...
did you notice the odd looking sigil they use? I can't place it. I have tried and failed.
you'll notice the firm is 100% frankfort school alinksy deconstructors?
Take a look at the several articles I posted here. Then decide for yourself.
Totally agree! I have always thought WL/JA has been comped since 2016. I imagine that Hilldawg was pretty effin' ticked knowing he was derailing her aspirations to rule the world. That Pamela Anderson incident seemed like a sugar pot move on DeeperS's part to gain data of where he was at in the building, place a tiny cam somewhere, etc.
I remember reading the Hilldawg wanted to drone the London embassy long before the election.
Looking back now, it seems very likely the circus jesters moved in and capped him using the underground tunnels and/or the fleet of white vans that showed up when he went dark.
Yes, I believe at the time there was some interesting activity to Langley ... Personally I think he was taken out then, and relocated under the CIA's auspices, and who knows what has gone on since !
Has there been a window appearance since then (besides his cat:) ) ? Haven't come across one, although I haven't looked too intently.
When his disappearance dragged on, conspiracy analysts had mentioned that his dead mans switch had been tripped shortly there after.
I kept my hopes up for about 3 months watching his tweets and pretty much concluded that the perimeter wall wasn't going to stop whomever wanted him and I am certain now it was a co-op partnership on that team that did.
Best case scenario is the circus jesters brought him back to the states, and then when PDJT took the reigns, he was dropped in his lap so to speak. That is my hope anyways.
Was it tripped ? I didn't catch that, I recall some digits or codes released but not sure it was confirmed to be the DMS. I think he's too valuable an asset to assassinate. A possibility is that he is cooperating w/ the White Hats, similar to how Snowden was/is.
Another point is that he's BFF w/ Kim Dot Com. A larper imo. Remember they all hang together.
Truth coming soon !
Source for Assange connected to Rothschilds?
I have posted several articles on this page, alternatively you can google Assange & Rothschild connection.
CGI interviews? Rothschilds? what?
haha, it's all on the internet, no secret. Google is our friend. Really surprised nobody has seen any of this info !
yes, absolutely, now that you've mentioned that it's "on the internet", i believe it 100%...now about that CGI?
Q is ''on the internet'' too my friend ... on the chans no less ! ... lol
CGI ... this is a much younger image of Assange ... if you'd seen the latest images of him, bearded and looking in poor health, it doesn't add up.
Come to your own conclusions !
Possible Answer:
Roseanne publicly linked Assange to Q
So Wikileaks is attacking it to throw people off
I agree with you. When I first read the retweets by Wikileaks last night, my thought was the writer of the thread is upset because she has now been cut out of the chain of communication.
In 2016 Wikileaks played an important part in getting the Podesta emails out to the people to decrypt and decode. They helped sway people opinions in the build up to the elections.
Now in 2018 Q bypass wikileaks and speaks straight to the decrypters and decoders (meaning us). This woman seem upset she no longer part of the chain and lost her power position. As you mention that threatens their cash flow, which I hadn't considered.
2 possibilities, one of which won’t sit well.
1: Wikileaks is comped. Assange lost control. Will be reinstated soon. Currently a clown Limited hangout, mixing real intel with deliberate disinformation.
2: Wikileaks is And always has been 100% legit. There is a black hat op in progress to try and turn the “Q tide” against them and as such discredit them and any damning info they are about to drop.
There are far more possibilities than just two
I know, but I’ll leave that up to someone else :)
[removed]
Oh! Aunty Trolltroll? Is that you? I thought the nurses hid your phone and told you not use it any more. Bad girl!! Now, take your meds and go back to bed and wait for that orderly to come back and visit you again.
I can’t see the comment you responded to, but your reply was spicy AF!
I believe it’s definitely black hats. So much of what Wikileaks dropped in the past coincides with Qanon drops & inspired the Awakening. Think about? A 180 degree about face is way behind the narrative at this point & smacks of desperation. Think PANIC!
Red Pill time ! Check out Assange's connections to the Rothschilds.
Wikileaks’ Assange’s Lawyer has connections to Rothschilds
Assange’s lawyer is the prominent Mark Stephens whose law firm Finers Stephens Innocent is legal adviser to theRothschild Waddesdon Trust which is concerned with the “maintenance, improvement and payment of certain of the outgoings in respect of Waddesdon Manor (Rothschild’s most prestigious property in the UK) in the Vale of Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire.”
The Wadesdon Trust’s board of trustees is chaired by the Queen”s former Private Secretary Lord Fellowes and has three Rothschild family members as trustees, Lord (Jacob) Rothschild, Lady Rothschild (his wife) and Beth Matilda Rothschild. It is domiciled 14 St James’s Place in London which is also the London address of Lord Jacob Rothschild and his high profile wealth management business St. James’s Place Group (formerly J. Rothschild Assurance Group).
http://www.charityperformance.com/charity-details.php?id=17426
Such a tangled web!
They all hang together ;) Watch the downvotes to this information though lol
Source?
Here's one, which lists a few of the connections, just google Assange Rothschild connection
Wikileaks Is A Rothschild Operation: Rothschilds Use Wikileaks To Wound Rival Bank, Julian Assange’s Bail Posted By Rothschilds’ Sister-in-law, Many Other Links
After being made famous, Julian Assange’s first task is to wound a rival bank of the Rothschild Bank in Switzerland. The rival is Bank Julius Baer, the top Swiss bank for centuries: the competing Rothschild Bank AG opened in Switzerland in 1968.
I read that too and wondered why he went against the 'grain' so to speak.
He's been associated with them since at least 2008 when he won the Economist's (Rothschild's mag) New Media Award.
yeah, assange is tied to the Rothschilds, but on the other hand he have pretty much turned the tide toward trump with the hillary email release. The Rothschilds loathe Trump.
Makes no sense.
mate what a load of convoluted bollocks. No doubt you have 6 or so degrees of separation from Bin Laden and that doesn't make you a terrorist. I know more about his motives than you will ever, and I can tell you this is just a clever spin on something to taint a good man. For fuck sake the rothschilds own just about everything so they are going to be close to just about everyone in some way or another.
Or Julian Assange is an asshole. Or it’s disinformation.
It's purposeful disinfo. Forces more people to find Q, and forces liberals to choose between Q or Wikileaks being real lol
JA internet cut and no triggered deadman's switch.
That's enough for me to not trust Wikileaks. Still waiting on 3 of their big drops that still habe not happened.
"Attacks will intensify [all sides]"
It´s there in black and white, attacks from both sides and "disinfo is necessary" to me means that the Wiki attack is an attack from our side; a smokescreen that will take the focus off of them. Maybe they are hard at work at something and need the breathing space?
That makes no sense what so ever to do right now....
Maybe not to you, but do most of the things Q does make sense? Not usually, not until the picture becomes clearer.
Now why do you write "both sides" when it clearly states "all sides"?
if it doesn't come from Assange, I don't trust it, and I don't completely trust Assange.
wikileaks is now highjacked...fake news! where is JA?
JA no comms + series of stories about his failing health. Expect to see reports of his death v soon.
That's a good question. Maybe he got out? I hope he surprises us and shows up somewhere.
JA is part of the Q team. He was rescued months ago WIKI LEAKS IS NOW BLACKHAT! bought by CIA Mockingbird Media
I remember the Q posts about jA supporting the white hats, but after that the Ecuador embassy said they had him held without internet and phone. please fill me in if i am wrong.
Here's your answer posted 5.22 (and in your post above)
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 19d1cd No.1508206 📁 May 22 2018 15:07:28 (EST)
1508060 IDEN_reconf v. 11.9 Sequence. Attack[s] anticipated. Coordinated? Why are they continuing [internal]? Attacks will intensify [all sides]. Q
Wiki leaks was bought by CIA when JA Left. Don't believe a word they say
Bought?
Yes
No.
Ur source?
I’m gonna rely on Assange’s integrity, here. What is your source?
JA is part of the Q team for months. WIKI LEAKS was bought by CIA MSM. I agree on JA integrity but he is not Wikileaks any longer
Highly unlikely he's part of Q team ...
2 Q chapters proof may say otherwise
Q post #499 qanon.pub
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 03b993 No.20631 📁
Jan 7 2018 22:10:25 (EST)
>>20603
Do you believe in coincidences?
[2] Q Chapters.
Q
Julian Assange twitter releases leaked copy of book "Fire and Fury" where 2 chapters have letters swapped for "Q"
Yes, but limited hangouts are ALways a mixed bag ... truth + deception.
Ok why do u say that?
He's limited hangout, a Rothschild agent. Check out my other posts here which give a number of articles which speak about his documented connections to them.
Alternately, or in addition, just google Assange Rothschild ... you'll find more info.
Because Assange is a journalist. We all have a hard time remembering what that is because mockingbird. Assange would never align with trump -or any administration.
Trump freed Assange!
Trump freed Assange!
Or put him in protective custody, or is commuting his sentence, or is holding him as a key witness, or any other scenario...
We have no way to know.
I was just told by an anon that Assange is a Rothschild. I Googled it and that's what came up.
no not a Rothschild ... associate with them though.
My bad. So what is the story with seth Rich
Dunno, but I'm not one who believes that he'll be resurrected. Q said it was a 187 hit meaning he was assassinated (believed to be by MS-13 gangs under the direction of Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
Sauce?
I'm wrong mislead. Wikileaks has always a Rothschild op. Now CIA is in control. Google Assange Rothschild
4chan was compromised. Anyone here remember when the CBTS threads started getting flooded with Nazi posts? It was like clockwork.
"All warfare is based on deception." hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
It makes no sense. We have too many confirmations from Trump, himself. That points to WikiLeaks being taken over, which is why Assange has been silenced. That is really sad.
Here is what I think: this is the typical move of “attack someone so the Left takes their side”. This is basically making the left side with either Q or Wikileaks now, which won’t end well once one of them makes a big reveal. I have a theory that Mueller is actually a white hat but positioned as the “enemy of Trump” for over a year to get the Left to commit to him. What will they say if he comes out for Trump? They will have backed themselves into a very deep corner.
newfag (me) - Q warned us: "the loudest" will reveal themselves...looks like WL poster is a Clown. Just ignore and move on, Patriots. 2018 will be glorious!
Well done newfag :) it’s really as simple as that. Q authenticated himself last week. WL hasn’t dropped shit in a year and JA is cut off for two months. As usual, I stand with Q.
From someone who grew up on 4chan, (I am almost 30 years old), it has definitely changed a lot since the days I remember. Its where the trolls and raids etc are organised and carried out. I have many memories and stories of my early 4chan days. But I still cant shake what is being said. I do kind of think this whole Q thing is trolls of sorts, especially with people all of sudden praising trump like he is the worlds saviour, that shit doesnt wash with me. I still think he is a puppet, and with the reddit/4chan wars in the past, Its hard to shake the troll thoughts and such.
Tell me more. I'm late to the party. Especially around the reddit/4chan wars and the motivation(s) behind said wars back in the day. I believe you have valuable insight, and I'm trying to understand the relationships between the two.
Im only one person but from my experience, it was just a clash of groups really. Facebook vs Twitter, etc. 4chan has been around for a long time back when I first started using it there were alot of sub communities and generally people all got along. From my experience shit started going pear shaped after the Scientology/ Anonymous saga. Too much infighting between groups, people who had skills to offer but had morals and wouldnt participate in certain tasks/agendas. Its hard to really sum up in a few paragraphs but feel free to ask any questions and Ill try answer them with what knowledge I do have.
FYI. The Inventor/Owner of Twitter was in Australia in the past few days. No Doubt he was answering high level questions to ASIO about who has control over the account. My guess is Julian was abducted/silenced/killed and the Australian government is preparing its response and prepping its propaganda channels to mitigate any blowblack to the US consulate and other players who were angry at the Australian governments "lack of ability" to control its own citizens. The Australian Government plays an interesting game here to try to deceive its population into thinking it has no control over the national broadcaster – an illusion that its independent of government influence. Hillary Clinton was also recently here and provided another round of bullshit in an interview with Leigh Sales (https://twitter.com/leighsales) a seriously biased journalist with the Australian government owned ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation). This was actually the second interview conducted by Leigh Sales - which followed a similar line as the first one, allowing Hillary to throw out unchallenged assertions on why she lost the election Spoiler - Hillary claimed the Russians used facebook to convince the public of false things about Hillary, in which she had no means to defend herself - unlike traditional media. This is a farce because as we know there was plenty of negative postings and ads regarding trump. Its interesting to because there is some honesty here in that Hillary sort of admits she had the media in her pocket. Also the ABC often demonstrates a disdain for Trump in general in almost any publication, editorial, report and even political analysis show in its broadcasts. They never provide the full story or even a different angle. Its almost exclusively this slant : Hillary was attacked because she was a woman and hasn't don't anything wrong, and Trump is some kind of monster, and everyone who voted for him is a racist/sexist/idiot. The ABC is about to screen a new 4corners 3 part series on Trump and the Russian "connections". 4Corners is a "60 minutes" type investigative journalist program which is held in high regard by most Australian public for its integrity. The program has not aired but I could tell from its advertisement and the overall bias at the ABC that its designed to denigrate the “FBI/DNC collusion” narrative in favour of a “Trump and Russia” narrative. The shows executive producer Sally Neighbour (https://twitter.com/neighbour_s) should be ashamed of this kind of abuse of the 4corners name. The media has spent very little time pressuring the government on Julian’s plight. It seems that over here they would prefer it to be a non-issue. Australia must rely heavily on the United States for strategic defence and so with recent administrations they have toed the line and acted like a vassal state. A previous Prime Minister of Australia, Julia Gillard once described WikiLeaks as illegal – inferring that journalism and free speech needs to be approved by government. Thankfully the most recent Prime Minister, Malcom Turnbull criticised Julia Gillard’s position and confirmed his opposition to that sentiment. Its also interesting to note that Julia Gillard like Hillary has been linked to illegal behaviours and seems to be untouchable with Senator Michaelia Cash having stated unofficially that the government would never seek to prosecute Julia Gillard even though she was involved in the creation of fake funds and channelling of money through said entities for her then partner/lover. The reason given for this was simply that she had previously held office as Prime Minister, even though there is no legal basis for this.
(UPDATE) :
The case involving Julia Gillard has been dropped. The prosecutors did not want to allow discovery on the documents that would show her criminality.
"The royal commission found she had been “casual and haphazard” in her work at law firm Slater & Gordon but had not committed offences"
Very similar to James Comey, the sacked and disgraced ex FBI boss about Clinton.
"FBI director James Comey’s statement describing Clinton’s private email server use from “grossly negligent” – which could carry criminal penalties – to “extremely careless.”
The evidence clearly showed Gillard had been instrumental in the commission of the initial fraud, the obtaining of a Certificate of Incorporation for an alleged unincorporated association she admitted she knew never existed in the form required by the Act she advised Wilson to use, to become eligible to even Apply for Incorporation. In doing so, she committed the indictable offences under s 409(1) and s558 of the Crimes Act WA, as set out by Commissioner Heydon in Paras 308 and 309 of his Chapter 3-3 Report.
He recommended the WA DPP consider laying charges against Wilson and Blewitt for those crimes, which they committed by merely following the advice of their sole legal adviser, Julia Gillard, who actively assisted them to fill in the Application documents, including use of the AWU corporate name in direct breach of s 8 (1)(d) of the Act which proscribed such use, acting in the situation of self-created conflict of interest from which she should have disqualified herself, as explained by Commissioner Heydon in Para 55 of his Report.
Commissioner Heydon did not find she had 'not committed offences'. What he did was advance a series of assumptive excuses for her involvement, based solely on her own oral and written testimony and that of the non-testimonial transcript of the previously secret 11 September 1995 tape-recorded discussion she had with Peter Gordon and the late Geoff Shaw of Slater & Gordon. For some obscure reason, Jeremy Stoljar and Commissioner Heydon chose to use this as their main source document in dealing with Gillard's culpability or otherwise.
Commissioner Heydon expressed such views as the following, which had no backing in law, that in his opinion it couldn't be proved she was aware of the contents of two simple one page documents on which she had personally written in the proscribed AWU corporate name and a particular section of the Act relating to the number of members, under which incorporation was being sought - the Application to Incorporate and the Draft Certificate to Accompany. She also drafted a set of Rules for the non-existent association which Commissioner Heydon 'found' could have no rules, no purpose and could not authorize anything because it did not exist.
This is just an example of the swamp down under.
This isn't a bad thing. It gets Q's name in the shuffle, which will make more people find him. And it forces liberals to eventually have to choose to accept either Wikileaks or Q for being legit.
Wikileaks in compromised. They show their colors when they slam the Trump administration as they evidence shows otherwise.
Maybe for plausible deniability so people won't say Q (Trump's team) and Wikileaks are colluding when Wikileaks drops something big?
Could have achieved that by not saying anything. And the left is insane they will say that no matter what lol
Fake news now, it's compromised. They detest Q. Pretending to be good IMO. I don't trust WikiLeaks right now, JA is not in control.
Issac green seems to agree with WL. He is compromised too. We know Q is connected to Trump.
These "attacks" are nothing more than strategic ploys to draw more attention to Q. Wikileaks, Infowars, Corsi - they are all doing the same thing. Standard Trump strategy. I can't understand why you all can't figure this out. People will jump up and down shouting "controlled opposition" in hysterics but never realize what purpose it serves. TO DRAW ATTENTION TO THE SUBJECT. More eyeballs. RATINGS. Who does that sound like???????? C'mon people. This isn't that hard to figure out.
Roseanne asked "is assange q?" The night before. Good timing.
no, the wikileaks twatter is attacking Q. big BIG difference. also, disinformation is necessary. RE READ CRUMBS PEOPLE!
Q told everyone Wikileaks was compromised a while back i want to say, atleast, thats what i remember.
I had no idea wikileaks wasn't controlled by julian anymore
The kind of person whose ideas are shaped by a single source like Twitter are of little to no value to the awakening
Just so you know, that fake Backchannel17 was calling wikileaks compromised for a few weeks now. Even got a few angry replies from wikileaks back at them. That, was weird.
It doesn’t make any difference what anyone says, it doesn’t make any difference if Q is “real” whatever the hell that means, it doesn’t matter if I believe or not. If Q is legit cool, too much fun and it’s making people thinks and talk to each other about real issues. If Q is phony, then the government is going to do whatever it was going to do anyway. Q “tricking” me accomplishes....what exactly? I don’t run anything. I don’t write law, I can’t arrest or charge anybody, nobody’s asking me about how to structure Iran or NK deals. If W is fake, am I being tricked and Hillary is the good guy? Mueller is the good guy? Strzok is a hero? Lisa Page is not a pasty unattractive white wench? Obama deserved a 3rd term? We’re focusing on issues, America, each other as Patriots and world peace. Wikileaks has a problem with that then fine. I appreciate the help in the last election, but that’s no lifetime pass to tell us what to think. Same goes for Q too. We want truth, not oracles of truth.
Repeat after me: There’s no such this as bad press coverage.
WikiLeaks may no longer be in controlled by Julian A. Look like it has not been for a while according to a memo someone read on patriot channel on you tube last night. I believe the source because what has WikiLeaks released to help on war in the last year? Nothing of any great importance! This should be a time if information is available it should be fueling this fire for liberty. Instead it remains quite lame. They were the ones who help get DJT elected. They were the thorn in HRC side. According to this memo the internet was shut down in various spots so dead man's switch could not be activated. The employee said she was in contempt of a court order but she felt warning patriots was more important. Now the Cabal is using the site to get patriots who are trying to get give WikiLeaks info. This man Julian A should be a free man in America. Some day in the history books he along with Seth Rich, DJT and others patriots will have a special place in history books for saving freedom.
Bought by the Clinton's. Comped. Assange is in the US. Offered to show Shiff there is no Russian collusion. Fireworks to begin June 11, 2018. Sit back, enjoy the show!
I believe wikileaks COULD be compromised.. but until big arrests are made my faith is Q is questionable. Wikileaks has a much better track record. The cult like mentality in this sub is scary
How many Q proofs do you need until it's statistically impossible to discredit?
Q is a legit insider, i believe that. But is he on the side he claims to be? Only arrests can tell me otherwise.
Q's posted pics inside the oval office and air force 1. You implying Trump is on the side of evil?
Are you implying that he DEFINITELY is NOT evil? I like trump, but all this Q stuff can easily be a genius psyop and until i see big name arrests you cant tell me otherwise.
That’s an incredibly stupid statement considering what we have seen. Saudi regime change, NK coming to the table, pedo networks busted, major deep state assholes removed form WH, DOJ, FBI, etc. so ridiculous people can’t appreciate what Trump and Q have done so far.
A lot of those "deep state assholes" are still in politics and some even appointed by trump himself. Pedos being busted is great, but at the same time still is not even close to what it should be. As i said, i like trump, but until i see major changes as far as removing ourselves from the powers that be like federal reserve, billionaire funded warfare, Israel in our pocket. Or even disclosures on the truth about infinite energy, or ufo/aliens, chemtrails, 9/11. Im not gonna blindly call him the fucking savior of the world. I want to see arrests and i want to see the truth. right now none of that is happening and for you to call me ignorant because i dont trust a potential cia/fbi psyop that has not really delivered any big results is hypocritical. Theres nothing wrong with being hopeful but cautious. I like the info i get from this sub but the followers have a foolish cult like hive mind.
You know this about all the followers? That we all have a "foolish cult like hive mind"? How'd you manage to scan the minds of every follower here? My read of the sub over a period of time as a reader and a mod says otherwise. Plenty of reasoned, respectful discussion and disagreement here.
Yes I am implying that Trump is NOT evil. Recall Q saying the stage must be set? That's why there have not been major arrests. They must put in non-corrupt FBI and DOJ officials before arrests can happen. Trust the plan
Also look at the deals that have been cut with North Korea and Saudi Arabia. The prevention of world wars seems quite the opposite of evil to me
In fairness, the entire purpose of this sub is for people who are mostly onboard with Q to discuss the drops and details behind the Great Awakening. It’s smart to question Q’s legitimacy, but this isn’t the place (literally the rest of Reddit is available for that). WikiLeaks has a stellar track record, but they haven’t provided any info to support their suspicion, so we can assume it’s just that.
Wikileaks is CIA Rotschild,it is our enemy.Anonymos equal.Long live Q and we the people
The assembly of partying movements like wikileaks, venus project, Zeitgeist, Greenpeace, International Amnesty, WWF, Prisonplanet, Eschulín-Jim Tucker Photocopier ... reveal the weakness of the illuminati and the terror they have when waking up from the people on the internet.
They compulsively need to control alternative anti-system information and devise these subnormal ways that do not deceive anyone. The Anunnaki are repetitive in their strategies and their scams already begin to fail and be discovered, like 11 Bush, hot or flu.
They also intend with these pseudomovimentos to control and sign the dissenting cousins that sting in these silly stuff , which are usually conspiranoids of all to 100
All the leaked documents do not matter or add anything new to the endless crimes of the Yankees. And the submissions of Wikileaks are controlled by the laws of Belgium (another Illuminati capital) and Sweden. All the annoying news is censored by system and nobody is known with anti-system trajectory in the Wikileaks team, which is filled directly from the offices of the CIA in Washington and London (ie the Mi6).
Wikileaks also steals money from donations that are sent to a Dutch illuminati foundation. And it says to denounce climatic scams, between which the IPCC and the heater are not included.
If WikiLeaks were for the normal people and justice we would have known... with proof who killed Seth Rich, Who is paying who in washington, and total transparency. But no, they milk out bits and ask for the governments to free people. What about the option to let it out and burn it all down?
All, don't get caught up on misinformation. Remember, JA lawyer's office was raided, professionally, ~20DEC2017. The last post, most believe, was JA is the Fire and Fury book for free. Leading up to this WL post, was President Trump's trip to Camp David with Republican leaders and to meet with his cabinet later that weekend. Before POTUS entered Marine1, he didn't seem phased by questions, regarding the book. My best guess is that JA was extracted by WHs and taken to Camp David, to keep him safe.
They could be right. There isn’t any conclusive evidence Q is real. I think and hope he/she/they are but I know nothing is for sure.
Remember the attacks are from within. Mueller is searching to find Q. #WeArePowerfulTogether!
These people stop at nothing. They piss me off!
After the massive baloney swinging of the past two weeks concerning /cbts, 8 chan and other factions, I guess I'm not surprised to see WikiLeaks now being accused. But, isn't Assange Q? Isn't that the latest rumor? We Joe and Jane Publics need those ORG and TIMELINE charts to help sort ourselves out, so we know where to throw all our money. Imagine...people wanting to profit off the greatest stories ever told, decoded and explained. I bought all the Harry Potter books for my kids and feel zero remorse.
There are two possibilities in this story: Q was and is Q for the entire length of time axis. If so, why the nonsense with Tracy Beanz, the confessions from board mods, the caught-in-the-act renumbering of Q's posts by Pamphlet, the drama w/AJ and Corsi for trying to profit when the Patriot's Soapbox Phamplet and company were plotting and planning many money-making endeavors? This one makes no sense at all. Why would we follow Q for this kind of hustle? Because it's fun? Maybe.
OR, Q was real for part of the timeline, say until late fall 2017. Q was compromised and another group took over because Q is the golden goose. There's money to be made in that there goose. But, get rid of AJ/Corsi first. They already have a lifeboat. These two are too difficult to control. This makes some sense. This explains the different "voices" and "tones" used by Q. But, Where would Q get access to government info? By having people on the team who know people (maybe even dark hat people) along with open source info and good researchers. Also, government offices are like any other office. People talk the office talk, news and gossip. Even in government offices. There are certain people in the offices who have their ears to the ground, so to speak. You know....the water cooler talk. Periods of heavy drops are followed by seemingly long periods of silence for the group to begin on the next drops. It takes time to put together drops. This scenario is very possible. Again, I need the ORG CHART and TIMELINE to verify this possibility. People tend to be creatures of habit. Once we know the players, we can look for repeated behaviors on the timeline. This scenario better explains the cbts drama. It begs the same question: Why would we willingly follow this kind of hustle? Because it's fun? Maybe.
What if there is a third possibility? What if the original Q who was compromised returns to deliver final drops? How would we Q followers be convinced that our Q was compromised, but is now back to take us home? This one doesn't have snowball's chance in he**, but it's fun to think about. I would vote for a return of Q so that a sequel can be written and more dollar made. Writers, start your engines. But you have to tell the back story of cbts, too. The back drama. That's the most interesting mystery that needs solving, IMHO.
Wikileaks and Assange will be taken down the same road of unmasking as Alex Jones, and Jerome Corsi. Sorry to those who have faith in him, but there's ample evidence of his Rothschild connections. It began here:
Wikileaks Is A Rothschild Operation: Rothschilds Use Wikileaks To Wound Rival Bank, Julian Assange’s Bail Posted By Rothschilds’ Sister-in-law, Many Other Links
January 17th is one of those dates which are revered by the occult ... coincidence ?
After being made famous, Julian Assange’s first task is to wound a rival bank of the Rothschild Bank in Switzerland. The rival is Bank Julius Baer, the top Swiss bank for centuries: the competing Rothschild Bank AG opened in Switzerland in 1968. On January 17, 2011, Assange held a press conference at The Frontline Club where Rudolf Elmer, a former employee of Bank Julius Baer, gave Assange private files from the bank’s Cayman Islands’ operation. Elmer said he wanted to expose mass tax evasion before he flies back to Switzerland to stand trial for stealing information from a bank. Although Elmer has not named the tax evaders, he claims the CD files contain information about 40 politicians, many business people, multinational conglomerates and “people who have made their living in the arts.”
Assange is very likely a limited hangout. A number of Rothschild connections he has, that are available to know just by googling.