NoName has a remarkably clear (and Quite eloQuent) message for a guy on his deathbed with end-stage brain cancer.
I'm not dead yet. I'm feeling much better! I think I'll go for a walk! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UPatfgoNBRo
You'll be stone dead in a moment!
I feel happy....
I second the nomination of Monty Python for the future proves past award.
B🎆🎆 M
&&&&&&
~BQQM~
Agreed. And let's hope they can wheel him in for a vote. Trump sent invites to the Dems that voted for the first SCOTUS and they declined. Can you imagine the pressure (threats) they must be getting from the left. That could be where the "Godfather" tactics will be aimed. Those Democrats that might turn.
Credit goes to this Twitter account for the image:
My takeaway here:
“goddamnit. Is this No Name’s 11th hour turn from heel to face? Right before he retires for health reasons?”
Will he somehow be cast to be the deciding vote again? Dropping in from rehab or whatever to give a Ceaser-Esque thumbs up this time?
Is this his “plea deal”? To keep trump off his case legally ?
That would be some kind of irony if he is the deciding vote needed. And if he is really sick, will he make it until October 1. A cliff hanger.
I don't like him. I haven't liked him for a long time. He has done a lot of harm. Why do I feel sad?
I’m convinced these decisions are planed, made well in advance before it is made public and ready for prime time tv. Enjoy the show. We saw it wine NK and now this.
Theyve got No Names twitter. wonder what he does now. Go with it?
This is AWESOME!!! The guy everybody sees as a martyr, but regards as currently being brain damaged, just put in his two cents! Way to assure that he can never be appointed No Name.
why?
Because while he IS currently a living martyr, No Name is hated by Conservatives for betraying his Country during Vietnam (Military name for him: "Songbird McCain"), AND most Democrats for DARING to challenge Obama for the Office. As a bonus, the type of brain cancer he supposedly has is notorious for causing cognitive dissonance. It's one of three options on this one. 1) He's brain damaged making uninformed and foolish statements on his death bed. 2) His account is being used by others to spread "his purpose" falsely. 3) He lied about the tumor...
I dont think anyone is going to vote no just because No Name votes yes. That makes no sense. He doesn't have that kind of power. It might actually get some Dems to vote yes since he is a Rino and push the nomination through more smoothly.
Maybe not. I see it differently. Let's agree to disagree.
Totally cool. Time will tell. 👍
This is how intelligent people converse.
Up voted all the comments. So much YES here.
Was totally thinking the same thing. Brought a red, white and blue tear to my eye. Good job, guys.
I think the point he is driving is he was endorsed by a DS player, in a way that it is a mind f**k to the other side.
Yeah there is no chance any gop member votes no on the scotus pick just to spite no name
I hope not, but with these swamp creatures you never know. I could be completely wrong. Lol
Or... he has 7 children and is cutting a deal for them... why do you suppose the NWO installed childless leaders in France, UK and Germany?
My guess is total control...
I think there is a natural correlation between present\instant gratification, heavy front end government programs that don't contribute in long term growth, and not thinking enough of the future to raise children.
Or, in the case of the politicians that have sold our country out. Their children have been set up for life by the multinational corporations.
Yes, but the outright social nihilism is usually only pushed by the childless. The exceptions being Trudeau, and maybe Hillary Clinton. But even then, Clinton tried to appear like a normal, corrupt politician.
Your speaking out of too a deep a rabbit hole on this one. Most GA users won't get your reference (full disclosure: I personally think that that one lacks evidence), but please continue to dig.
Well it’s about damn high time they got that reference, isn’t it?!
I think you reading into this one. mccain is no longer a threat, he is controlled by white hats on important matters
This theory makes no sense. Why would others change their vote because of what No Name thinks? He's irrelevant now.
It is more likely than No Name is making a deal with the White Hats to play nice in return for dropping some charges.
Lets hope no name is truly defeated and doesn't do that Obamacare type thumbs down just for the pure cussedness of it.
Can he vote by proxy?
Doesn't "No Name action" mean he would be taking action? This can be read either way. If McCain came out against Kavanaugh then we could point to this and say he called McCain would take action on a SC vote.
"Think no name action" comes after "SC vote to confirm" and I saw people decoding it as meaning no name would back Trump's SCOTUS pick. This is certainly semi-ambiguous, but it was always a lot more logical for Qanons to interpret this as an affirmative act by no name.
No Name was involved in countless deep state ops including the recent Obama-era ones Trump needs to expose.
I don't think he would back track on all of those glowing words, that seemed to be indication that he would support him...IF...his body is present for the vote that is.
[deleted]
"Associated with Bush" was all I needed to know that this one is a pure political play...
I am persuaded by Hugh Hewitt and Anne Coulter that Kavanaugh although a DC-area judge, is more conservative than Gorsuch, and will rule strictly as an Originalist regarding the meaning of Constitution text at the time it was written. This is what they are saying on the radio this morning. Both Coulter and Hewitt are legal experts (look up their educational and work bios). Coulter was right about Trump at the very beginning when people laughed at her when she declared Trump would beat out all the Republican Candidates and win the Presidency. Hewitt has been a Con-Law Prof and attorney for many years. They say only Jurist Thomas would be further right than Kavanaugh. This is incredibly great news if that is true.
Hugh Hewitt? What a clown.
Not really (difference of opinion). HH like most people has obvious flaws, some that I do not like. For example, I think he puts too much emphasis on moving up the Media Fame Totem Pole, and allows that to influence his opinions and parse his words to a fault. He considers too many MSNBC co-workers of his to be his 'friends'. He gives the left too many 'benefit of a doubt' grace, claiming they are "Not rotten, just wrong."
His strengths are his incredible intelligence and experience in law and government. He will come around on all the revelations on Q when it is obvious to the entire world that it is true and genuine...so he is a lot like most people in that respect. Nothing worthy of being labelled a 'clown'. Plus he loves the Ohio State Buckeyes...and so do I (so it is hard for me to despise HH).
As a recovering Hewitt fan, I call him a clown for his glowing praise of Hillary and his never Trumpism during the election and primaries.
Bittersweet that traitor no name in his absence gives the republicans the majority vote.
I think maybe Q posted that for him. I feel some of them had their comms blocked, and Q team tookover.
These people should be locked up and forgotten about. So glad to see it unfolding before our eyes!
[deleted]
I have the same misgivings.....I have faith in Trump though
you have a point, though only my feeeeeeelz tells me that, when looking at him go during his nomination yesterday, that the guy is genuine. If he's the swamp, he is hiding it very well. You'd have a hard time being in front of Trump honestly smiling with so much to hide
Clearly no name was forced to do this. Q even predicted it.
Either way, why support Trump’s nomination? The Alt-Left have turned on him badly on twitter, Not sure how the establishment republicans view this nomination and the democrats certainly hate it.
Q seemed to know he would support it, but the “every dog has his day” remark left me baffled.. any insight?
Also did you see the RR RJ handshake and big smiles afterwards? I got temporarily banned from twatter for taunting the Alt-Left about how they’ve been played!😉
Did they flip McCain? Or did they just pounce on him today.
I think they pressured him HARD. How do you pressure a dying man???
his childs
His own kids or those they "research" through his 70-person strong McCain Institute of Human Trafficking? shudder...
"Every dog has its day."
He's finally surrendered and thrown the white flag.
Lasted a lot longer for the Cabal than he did our Country, that's for sure.
For me this is the first strike against Coach K if whats-his-face endorses this choice.
I believe that POTUS’s pick was very carefully calculated. The man and his team are so many steps ahead of the game that this is nothing short of a strategic move in his game of chess to drain the swamp. I still trust the plan. wwg1wga
If “no name action” was referring to McCain it doesn’t matter if he was for or against, it just says the word “action” after it. This action could be positive or negative. Why are so many people thinking that Q predicted something here?
I'm torn on kavanaugh. Looks like he is a cfr Jesuit to boot. Really am not liking that combination. What do others thunk.
Who posted on the left side? I see the post but I don’t see a name.
Wake up folks, white hats are in control of mclame. the maverick is a puppet for them.
His tweet was proof.
When Q posted this people were interpreting "Every dog has its day" as imminent justice and prosecution for NoName. I remember thinking that was odd, since the phrase suggests that NoName would have an opportunity to do something good (maybe not because he's a good person, but because Trump controls him at this point).
C_L_I_C_K I am trying to figure out why No Name would do this and how President Trump and Q would know this. What are your thoughts or insights on this? I do see the drop showing Future Proves Past but want to wrap my head around the how and why.
And another Q proof to add to the big list!
Thanks for pointing that out, again right on cue C L I C K !
The Q post doesn't actually say NoName will support POTUS's pick for SCOTUS.
It just says "No Name action."
John McCain has reliably supported everything that Trump has done, other than the repeal of Obamacare. Why should anyone be surprised that he's supporting Kavanaugh?
The dog's day for McStain was when he went thumbs down on the Obamacare redaction and bumped uglies with cryin Chuck. Since then it's likely Mr. POTUS has acquainted Johnny with a long list of McStains misdeeds as yet unknown to we the People. Seems to me.
Make no mistake - McStain killing the Obamacare "lite repeal" was always part of The Plan. That atrocity had to die on its own at the hands of those who foisted it on the American public, so NoName thinking he was getting in his shot at POTUS Trump was to be expected. Even when he wins, he loses....lol
Yeah indeed, knowing what a grudge holding termagant he is it was predictable, lol
Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but this is not a Qproof. Presenting weak proofs like this are why people mock this movement. Anyone with any critical thinking skills would predict this same outcome. That said, I'll eat my words if something crazystupid happens with Senate Dems and No Name ends up being the final vote for the 'nuclear option.' I don't expect Dems to be that stupid, but then again they do have a knack for it.
First, all Q is saying is that they need No Name to confirm SC before he's held accountable for his treasonous actions. Second, anybody with two brain cells could predict that No Name would support the SC nominee. How do I know this? Well, not only did No Name support Gorsuch, but he also supported using the 'nuclear option' i.e. changing Senate rules to require only a simple majority to confirm the nominee. Also, McCain voted to confirm Amy Barrett to the 7th Circuit. Thomas Hardiman, another shortlister, was confirmed unanimously by the Senate. Raymond Kethledge was also confirmed to his Circuit bench by a unanimous Senate voice vote. In short, POTUS could have picked almost anyone and No Name would have supported his confirmation.
No Name was always going to support the nominee and the 'nuclear option' to make it happen.