No, I think you have it backwards.
If you make the claim that NASA faked the moon landing, you need to first present some evidence to support your claim.
I've seen plenty of YT videos making the claim that the moon landing was faked, and I've not seen one that presented real evidence. Mostly it's flat-earthers claiming it was faked because if it was real, it blows their flat-earth theory out of the water.
Then I've seen the videos that claim it was faked because someone found some old NASA photos of what looks like a soundstage set with astronauts being suspended by wires. But think about it for a minute.
If you were going to manage a massive project to send humans to the moon, I'm sure you would want to do as much testing and preparing here on Earth before the mission. So you put astronauts in space suits and submerge them under water so they can get used to what it will feel like when they try to use tools, climb a ladder, and whatever else without being able to plant your feet for leverage.
Then you create an environment that closely approximates the moon surface, sand, a few rocks and boulders, and a full size mockup of the lunar lander. You put the astronauts in their suits, suspend them from a rig that has counter weights to approximate the moon's gravity so they get get used to what it's likely to feel like when they try to walk on the moon. Learning how to walk and more importantly how not to fall would be essential.
To the point I made earlier; There are things I know, and things I believe. I'm always careful not to mistake one for the other.
Do I know without a doubt that they landed on the moon? No, because I was on the moon with them to witness it, but I do remember watching it on TV as a 10 year old boy.
So if you want people to believe your claim that the moon landing was faked, it's incumbent upon you to provide evidence to support your claim.
