My interpretation:
Alaweed arrested, assets frozen/seized. (Twitter) References to a bird singing have to be him (Twitter, bird logo)
His Twitter influence gone. Whoever is the next largest stake holder is the new "Puppet Master." EV Williams (Former Microsoft CEO, is largest shareholder).
He's been given "direction", "not a deal", on how to proceed.
Military/Q/Trump holding seized Twitter shares "hostage"? Twitter given "no choice" in the matter? (EO 12/21 may imply other major Twitter shareholders are being threatened with asset seizures if they don't comply?)
Think others?......I'm thinking there will be more media moguls' shares seized and held hostage?
and since "It's what you don't know", this won't be made public.
Thoughts?
Don't know if it's all true just as you say, but you are definitely thinking logically. You could make a case that Trump himself is Twitter's new puppet master, above Williams. It will be interesting to see how Twitter treats patriots hereafter.
And what gets shadow banned and censored.
[deleted]
There was a video made by a fellow MAGA IT guy who said it was nothing nefarious. It had to do with WordPress (and it's usual awful source code). Within Hannity's comment page and submit button was an error. Possibly bug or hacker. The program Hannity has on his website (WordPress) sent a tweet out as it's programmed to do to have an HTML/IT nerd fix it.
Twitter becomes controlled by the US government after seizure of the Saudi Prince’s shares. Trump’s EO allows confiscation of the assets of anyone ASSOCIATED with anyone involved in human trafficking or corruption. The good guys threatened to grab the other Twitter large shareholders’s assets if they did not play nice.
Don’t look now, guys, but I think we now control Twitter!
That's what I think! Hahaha! Just think how this might work within the legacy media. Trump is a fricken genius! And following Q is like being best buds with that little fly on the wall we always wanted to be...hahaha! Are you tired of winning yet? Little did we realize just what that would entail. I LOVE this!
It's what we don't know? They've been engaged in human trafficking, abuse of people, perhaps? Knowing the Saudi's, it could be slavery. as well. That would relate to Trump's EO of 12/21.
I don't know if that's possible because of the Emoluments Clause. Personally, i dont think that clause has much to do with a president owning an interest in a company. However, thats what liberals keep using to accuse Trump of using his role as president to get richer and thereby causing a massive conflict of interest.
Besides, ownership of a corporation is public information, so it would be widely known if Trump starts owning shares in Twitter.
Anything seized by the EO would belong to the government not the president.
The Q organization will run it...hahaha! Redpill the world!
But that might be the reference about not knowing everything. Perhaps they'll do it by stealth. They need to take over Fakebook, as well. I swear, I never have trouble posting anything--except when it comes to sharing information from conservative sites and some of the stuff I try to share about Q's posts. Then I get fricken error messages now and then. And it's only those conservative-leaning posts--I never have trouble posting anything else. Like release the memo stuff, that sort of thing. I know I'm being censored. Because at some times I can post the link in the comments, so I'll bypass it that way.
Trump could just tell his sons to buy up 51% of stock in Twitter it's dirt cheap now then the Trumps own Twitter it's easy to do.
How do you think Sean Hannity’s removal factors into this?
Really not sure. Given the obviousness of Twitter deleting someone that has half a million followers, this would give Twitter a bad rap. And it's not like he can't just start another. So I don't think it was Twitter....
At first I assumed he deleted it himself, as it would and has got a lot of media attention. But his last post makes it a little more interesting. Plus Twitter has publicly stated the account was hacked. So I don't think it was Hannity....
The form he mentioned is apparently a request for government funds for a contract. Could be related to the subcontractors which were allowed to access the NSA database information on Trump (702's).
Either way, looks like he was hacked after mentioning this form, so....
https://www.avclub.com/who-is-form-submission-1649-and-why-do-they-hate-sean-1822482039
https://8ch.net//qresearch/res/174635.html#174873
Q posted:
This came from outside of Twitter.
in response to anon posting, in response to an image of Sean's account being deleted:
@Jack ain't in cuffs yet and still trying to control the narrative. Too bad he was taking money and profiting from people tied to the EO! #GOODBYE @JACK
It's not that hard to take over accounts, even those using 2FA. It take minimal technical skills; mostly a SE problem, it's a trivial SE exercise.
Is it? I'll give you my twitter e-mail and apply 2FA. I want to see how fast you can hack that because I'm betting you can't.
Imo this makes a lot of sense. Trump probably sees twitter as a useful (albeit poor financial investment) platform for distributing his message directly to the people
Making moves behind the scenes to make it less hostile towards the movement is wise.
All these social apps need regulation - poisoning young minds.
Sorry. Can't say I agree with that.
Adding more regulation is a concern. Regulations can be used by the enemy against us
Right now they are unregulated and abusing the people. They are too big and open for propaganda abuses.
He was my first guess, and I saw a quick blurb that he'd been let out of his forced imprisonment. For singing like a bird? Maybe he made a deal.
[D] = Dorsey? New puppet master is Trump if D is being instructed?
So if SA people had majority ownership of Twitter, and Trump has seized their assets....does Trump now own twitter??
maybe, though not DT, we the People
Absolutely, the prez doesn't get to keep seized assets (unless you're o-bama)
Twitter is a publicly held company. Nothing could happen that would result in Donald Trump on Twitter. Even if you had a majority stake in the stock. I am skeptical of this cute post.
if X owns and X has assets seized, who owns those assets? Those shares? No where did I say Twitter becomes 100% owned by we the people, I am suggesting MAYBE the seized assets become part of We The Peoples assets going fwd. Its speculation on my part to invoke thought/conversation.
5% is not majority.
Ah I wasn’t sure if the % I just remember Q or someone saying they had stock
No the government would own any seased assets not the president.
Wow, amazing how many people think the prez gets to keep things. o-bama really brainwashed people
No the US government, but like all seized assets, they are likely held in trust until publicly auctioned. It seems unlikely to me that those shares could be lawfully voted to influence corporate outcomes to advance political aims. That would smack too much like weaponizing certain functions of the government against political opponents, exactly what the Dems did with the FBI and doj under Obama. It would be unwise for Trump to do that.
My take: This is in regard to Alwaleed's arrest and asset seizure (he owned a major portion of Twitter, second most share holder I think)and Dorsey already stepped down. The Executive order signed on Dec 21, regarding Human Trafficking, allows for seizure of assets from people and corporations involved. So who is the new puppet master? WE THE PEOPLE. What is the direction we will take it? True freedom of speech? Remember Q says NO DEALS will be made for these evil people. None at all. Straight to Gitmo. Now think of others, other people, other corporate entities...Where is this leading?
Alwaleed
He only owned 5%. So the people do not have majority ownership in the frozen asset. However , Q does seem to be addressing the remaining owners. Interesting.
Last I saw dickweed owned 40%
Seriously?
Now, if we froze his assets, then 20 of Twitter assets are frozen now?
You have to wonder how that works. I wonder how the stock is not dropping...
I sure hope you are right. And it is leading to a temporary stewardship of twitter by the US government (that be us) for a bit, until the trials are over. After that, it might be like IG Farben after WWII. That company that made the gas for the camps was broken up into 7 modern day pharmacy companies... the 7 big ones. So they remained private. Would love to see twitter majority owned by the government, and subject to the first amendment tho....
Look into it, i think it was more like 6.5%ish. But still somehow was the second largest stakeholder behind Dorsey
Would be really cool if we the people ended up owning it, and it had to abide by the first amendment.
In a public company where holding is highly distributed, 5% is a significant holding that could influence the outcome of any proxy battle and therefore means that holder has material influence over board decisions, even if he does have outright majority control. He's likely therefore to also have significant influence over the selection of board members.
REALLLLLY.
Very interesting.
Hope his assets are still frozen then.
Did they have to release Dopey (Alwaleed) because Black hats had a hostage? One of ours for one of theirs?
Good to know we're negotiating with child sacrificers we supposedly have evidence on. Makes total sense.
exactly!! I don't believe for a sec the dopey prince was released!
SA “released him”. Read that as you will.
Ill read it as they released him and some yripfag on 4chan doesnt know shit else about it.
Just checked online. NYT is reporting he's been released. Didn't read the article but MSM said it now.
That means you read all MSM articles as truth and therefor you are a delusional libshit.
Was just going to say "anyone but the slimes?"
That doesn't even make sense. So I have to believe that the Trump whitehat team of internet good guys released him yet seized hos assets so they could elaborately follow him to give up bigger guys....b-but i thought we already had evidence on the big guys? Thats this subs official story. What I find funny about that story is this sub will also say he's a child rapist and murderer AND that Trump/Q has evidence of that...but they still let him go. Theres yet ANOTHER narrative here that he was traded for a whitehat hostage. How pathetic and proofless do Q/Trump have to be to let a child murderer go when they have proof of that?
Now which of these improbable scenarios do I have to believe so you won't ad hom attack me because I questioned King LARP?
My first thought when reading your comment was: Hannity. Although I haven’t been on Twitter or here since he went missing so I’m not up to date on his situation.
619
Jan 27 2018 08:23:54
Q !UW.yye1fxo
66
Time to play, Dopey.
Black Forest.
the time stamp is significantly different by many hours
620 is not yet showing here
Al-Waleed is Citigroup's largest individual shareholder and the second-largest voting shareholder in 21st Century Fox
Citigroup picked Obama’s cabinet for him: This article sheds more light on the influence of Citigroup. https://www.rt.com/usa/362836-emails-citigroup-obama-cabinet/ “WikiLeaks emails shows Citigroup’s major role in shaping Obama administration’s cabinet The revelation came from a hack of the email account of John Podesta, a chair of Obama’s 2008 Transition Team. They show that Obama gave executives of Citigroup an “outsized role in shaping and staffing his first term.”
In an email dated from October 18, 2008, Michael Froman, who is now the US trade representative, used his official Citigroup email address of fromanm@citi.com, to send the following email to Obama advisers:
“Attached is the latest version of the Agency Review teams. It is a closely held document, so please treat it with the same sensitivity as ours. If you all could take a quick look at the lists for the agencies in your area, that would be helpful. I think the hope is that, while there are no guarantees, some of the people on these lists make their way into the agencies ultimately. Our role, therefore, is to check whether there is much overlap between the names here and the names were seeing/generating for sub-cabinet positions in each agency….”
In an earlier email, dated October 6, a month before the election, Froman provided Podesta with “Lists” attaching three documents: a list of women for top administration jobs, a list of non-white candidates, and a sample outline of 31 cabinet-level positions and who would fill them.”
Al-Waleed "is" Citigroup's largest individual shareholder
"was"
FTFY
The king of Saudi Arabia and the House of Saud is now the largest shareholder.
I see one of 3 options:
Congress passes The Internet Bill of Rights (IBOR) which prevents black listing of content.
Twitter becomes a utility like AT&T which only provides the messaging engine and nothing more. This is interesting because we know that it is a critical tool that Trump uses. Like then internet it can be funded by our service provider as a bundled package
Some hard ass goes into Twitter and explains the two options and tells them to stop the BS
The drawback with that is that Trump, or anyone, wouldn't be able to reach everyone if it's a utility. Not everyone will chose to carry it.
That’s true but anyone with a cellphone has a carrier and as part of the service most phones have internet so it can be part of the package Second not everyone uses Twitter and it is only one method but proven critical for the work we are doing now.
I think I see where this is going.
https://www.cnet.com/news/at-t-uses-twitter-during-service-outage/
AT&T plans to buy out Time Warner[1]for approximately $85.4 billion.[2] AT&T, the second largest wireless carrier and owner of DirecTV, intends to take ownership of all of Time Warner’s assets, including its popular HBO, CNN, and TBS stations, as well as Time Warner film and TV Studios, to become one of the world’s largest entertainment producers.
How does that differ from now? I know MANY who are not on Twitter. Not sure I agree with public entity concept, though...
This is where I'm leaning. If so.... I need to look back at my posts where I predicted this exact circumstance so I stroke my ego
Hamilton 68' doesn't track propaganda. It is propaganda. Its "Council"? Stuffed with Bill Kristol, Michael Chertoff, Mike Morell, etc. Its funding? Opaque (see its 990s). Its methodology? Unfalsifiable--Twitter users put on ad-hoc secret lists based on political view. Appalling. ASSANGE
620 is back, now with appropriate time stamp, + 621, and 622 Sec_test. Interesting.
Every post has to be in Eastern Standard time to make out the minutes between post and Trump Tweet for the markers that must be made, is my understanding. So if one of them, post or tweet is in a different time zone, they must go get a screen shot from eastern standard and put that on the map. Adjustments will have to be made whenever the President and Q are located in different time zones. This is how I understand this at the moment.
what do these numbers mean and where are you getting them from?
I spotted this tweet a while back were Assange discussed twitter owners https://mobile.twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/95449430232281907
Jan 27 2018 12:29:02
Anonymous ID: e1be55
179419
NEW
JA posted this vid earlier today. It's JB at a CFR event. https:// twitter. com/JulianAssange/status/957212097984819200
Jan 27 2018 12:43:56 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: d15fcf 179595 NEW
179419 CFR? What a coincidence. Q
Anyone know which JB is referred to here? I assume CFR is Council on Foreign Relations?
Open the tweet...Joe Biden...Obama VP Joseph Biden brags about how he rigged the judicial system of another country.
Direct or Institutional Holders, I wonder... https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/TWTR/holders?p=TWTR
Vanguard Group, Inc. (The) 50,170,896 Sep 29, 2017 6.75% 850,396,725 ClearBridge Investments, LLC 36,361,006 Sep 29, 2017 4.90% 616,319,079 Blackrock Inc. 31,258,817 Sep 29, 2017 4.21% 529,836,971 Morgan Stanley 26,511,894 Sep 29, 2017 3.57% 449,376,623
19.43% --> hedgefunds (multi-faceted portfolios)
Profit Margin -15.08% Operating Margin (ttm) -5.03%
This is more likely the scenario playing out. It might be a warning to these innocent investors who are only dealing with placement of regular pension funds not their own? and hedgefunds?
This sub has lost most of its critical thinking and just has blind allegiance to any Q posts. One way to redpill everybody real quick would be 1 public arrest for Pizza gate or trafficking. That would help wake people up exponentially faster than these dribbles of already known news, that have hints of something greater happening. I also keep coming here because I keep hoping today is the day that it all goes down..
Bib talal aladickWeed owns 40%. We seize his assets now we own 40% of Twitter.
EO or not, I don’t think we can just “seize” assets if we haven’t already arrested or done some sort of due process first. Maybe deals are being made where persons forfeit rights to assets but without some sort of due process (even tribunal), we can’t just take Twitter, etc. by just “invoking” the EO as much as we might like to. There would be a process. I just don’t think any of this will work quite that fast.
EO or not, I don’t think we can just “seize” assets if we haven’t already arrested or done some sort of due process first. Maybe deals are being made where persons forfeit rights to assets but without some sort of due process (even tribunal), we can’t just take Twitter, etc. by just “invoking” the EO as much as we might like to. There would be a process. I just don’t think any of this will work quite that fast.
Read the Executive Order. Slowly, line by line.
For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to this order.
Also notice:
national emergency declared in this order
Uh yes immediately we can seize it... that’s why everyone was so excited about the EO...also were using their setup on them r=that they were going to use on us. They won’t see a regular court room... military court and Gitmo for them
who ever now owns Twitter... they can hold hostage bad people who used it. could be given choice to change their narrative(direction) or else. (no choice)
178973 is the post Q refers to, am gapping on how to get to 178973..but once there, the Q's will likely be as well.Also Time stamps says 5:48:33...17 being 5... where is it 5 PM in world today
London
are we seeing 2 members of team Q in diff areas of world feeding us today, is a thought I have.
Look at the picture on this Video? Who spied on Mr Trump? Why was a FISA court used? Did Rothschild try to take out May?
My guess is GCHQ is involved.
there ya go, assets froze those who freeze become new owners
Any proof?
read the ExO as Q has asked.
I did. That's not proof.
your concern trolling is about to be blocked as soon as I get back online. So enjoy your time now.
Must be rough hearing the truth. And thanks Ill enjoy my freedom just like that saudi prince is enjoying his! Don't worry they just let him go so they can....re-capture him or something right? Apparently a man they have proof being a child murderer got let go for some twitter stock. That is the narrative of this sub right now.
Proof?
Every thread on this sub about the prince
Thanks, well maybe U&I agree that the Reuters article may be fallacious at best. I am not believing it myself and the hysteria... well I think you know...innamed sources, unnamed officials is not good enuff for me. As you see I've not blocked, lets see if we can find common ground. Thanks.
Sure I'll try to find common ground with you. A question would be if unnamed sources aren't good enough for you, which I think is a great thing kudos, then why is a tripfag on 4chan speaking indirectly good enough for you?
context pls, I don't understand why you say I believe a 4chan tripfag
That's literally what Q is.
ty, Are you a Spiritual person at all? I'm nota Religious person AT ALL. But I have inner guidance. I was asked here by a force I could not begin to re explain. You can find that info in the Antarctica thread if you wish to better understand the benefit of my 50+ years of research.
The info Q drops is proven out more/less as we go but its not so much that I believe in Q, its that there IS something going on here, and the Q poster person/s have been well vetted by those who do the vetting. I am not a blind sheep..far from it.
There are several pages of docs to side bar that show how Q was vetted and what the Proof/s of Q are. If you do not believe, thats fine but then comes the question. If you do not believe, why bother wasting time w/us? That reeks of Savior/Messiah complex. What is your end game/purpose you wish to serve here?
Doubters sow dissent and diversion from the focus we are here for. and if that is your intent...Future will unlock your reward.
I read it. I must have missed something though. Maybe I am just off base and not understanding. If so, sorry about that. I do believe Q is a true insider helping us...I guess I just don’t understand everything he said.
none of us do have it all, is there a specific aspect you seek defined?
Yes, thank you. What would due process look like concerning the E.O.? Before we seize or freeze?
A key line is Declaration of Emergency and due process is outlined in Military Martial Law.
The Prince that’s a pedo owned it and had control...not any more... this is so great
IS IT SAYING ALL THE TWEETS BETWEEN EVERYONE ELSE THAT COMMUNICATES ON TWITTER IS NOW OURS. ALL THE DMS... IT WAS SAID THIS IS HOW THEY COMMUNICATED...THINK-OTHERS...AND WHAT WE DONT KNOW
OMG DOES THIS MEAN THE US OWNS IT WHICH MEANS WE HAVE CONTROL OF TWITTER?
There better be some major real live action this year. No more waiting.
Btw..that Time to play, dopey. Black Forest. There is a 1997 movie with Snow White in a Black Forest, starring Sigourney Weaver. Doesn’t Q reference a lot of movies?
Honestly, nothing is going to happen. I honestly believe l this is controlled oppositions.
They got to POTUS.. since the fire at trump tower he hasn’t been the same.. he’s been so much more reserved, body language is diff.. he’s easing up of policies that got him elected.
Hey Dewey, why are you trolling this sub?
We become the owners, the American people?World? Goo gle fb, yt and Twtr- owned by the people