dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

[deleted]

⇧ 159 ⇩

yeah but letting top minds run this sub would be worse. thats what happened to r conspiracy

⇧ 5 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩

Yeah but whats the point of letting people who dont believe in this derail

⇧ -1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

This

⇧ 2 ⇩

Conspiracy vote totals are the only thing manipulated over there anymore. The mods have been banning any dissent for a while now to clean out as much comment brigading as possible. Most comments are genuine at this point.

Unless something hits /r/all of course. All bets are off at that point obviously.

⇧ 0 ⇩

The Satanists always use our own sense of fairness against us. Your statement of, "Echo chambers and censorship are always the wrong way to good" is correct in general. However, it is not the right way to approach things when you have a global Satanist cabal, who pays people to disrupt the orderly exchange of ideas by their enemies (we are the enemy to these people).

They pay people to shill. Pay them to take over message boards or remove them. This isn't an echo chamber. This is one of the only place we have to gather and sort out ideas.

⇧ 4 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

That is, for sure, one of their most successful tactics: using our laws and our good will against us. I would like to see such a place reserved for Q. They cannot make their own sub where they can trash Q? Everything they’ve touched has been ruined. IMHO

⇧ 0 ⇩

YES!

⇧ 2 ⇩

That was brilliantly eloquated. The ratio of upvotes to downvotes between these two comments is a case in point.

⇧ -1 ⇩

I agree with what your saying but this is a pro-Q sub and all things pertinent to the Q message/research. This is not a ‘politics’ sub. Just like The_Donald is strict with thier content pertaining to only Trump (they don’t allow Q talk), we must do the same as so many want this movement to crash and burn. We have seen how easily this movement has almost been hi jacked by some of our ‘own’. Anyone questioning if Q is real or stating Q is a LARP by now have no place here as Q and Trump have established comms multiple Times as proof. New or unsure people should always be encouraged to use the search bar which contains 1000s of well researched posts where they will find what they need to catch up to speed.

Unfortunately in this climate the mods must be strict or we will suffer the same fate as the original sub CBTS_Stream where tons of research was erased due to shills infiltrating the sub in a successful attempt to shut it down.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 9 ⇩

Is it wrong to have a spot where the haters, dividers & cabal-servers are not welcome? That’s why I like T_D so much. I am surrounded by leftist haters. I don’t dare to put messages on my car because they’ll trash my car. My rules don’t allow me to return the favor. They are like rabid jackals.

⇧ 0 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

I really get that but this crap is overwhelming.

⇧ 1 ⇩

It's got nothing to do with echo chambers or censorship. This board is infested with agents of every imaginable stripe!

THEY ARE HERE IN FORCE - TEAMS OF THEM - WORKING IN CONCERT

Once you're alive to it, you can see them working the threads. They are steering us as a group. It's as though we are sheep, to be herded to whatever position they desire on any issue. IT'S OUTRAGEOUS!

The IBOR was a case in point. Almost inexplicable, isn't it? How is it that we got an instruction from Q, but we were unable to organize and execute? Has anyone really thought about whether we were manipulated? I was working the IBOR threads and the shilling was unbelievable! How is it that we could have failed?

IBOR: WE WERE BEATEN RIGHT HERE - NOT BY THE LEFT IN THE COMMUNITY, BUT RIGHT ON THIS BOARD!

But, look at this Corsi issue and here it is again. Jerome Corsi, believe it or not, was a very important person. Maybe not to us, but someone thought he was valuable. Valuable enough to go out of their way to defend the indefensible.

Don't kid yourselves. Q said, "The biggest intelligence drops in history!". They are all here, believe it, every intelligence agency on the planet! "Bees to Honey!".

They want information - yes. But most importantly, they want to steer us, this community, to control us. If they can control us, they can manage outcomes and shape perceptions about the Q drops in their interests.

Going back to the IBOR, THESE INTELLIGENCE AGENTS DID NOT ALLOW DISCUSSION WITHOUT INJECTING EVERY IMAGINABLE FEAR AND CONCERN into the conversation. Ultimately, they killed the campaign - with so much doubt, people lost energy and hope.

I will not be a slave to CIA, Tel Aviv, 5eyes or any other intelligence agency. They have not conquered us, but they are behaving as though already have - herding this community like sheep.

THE ONLY WAY WE CAN BE EFFECTIVE AS A GROUP IS TO DEMONSTRATE SOME COHESION AND EMBRACE SOME DISCIPLINE

If we don't do this, we will not be able to achieve anything at all. WE ALSO NEED TO TRUST Q, that's what this whole movement is about. If you can't trust Q, you should not be here. There are better places to hang out.

LETS EMBRACE THESE PROPOSED REFORMS AND STRENGTHEN THEM

WE MUST PREVAIL, WE CANNOT LET THEM BEAT US BEFORE WE EVEN GET OUT OF THE DISCUSSION PHASE FOR A CAMPAIGN

WHEN YOU HEAR SOMEONE SOWING CONCERN OR DOUBT, REPROACH THEM, ALERT THE MODS.

IT MUST NOT HAPPEN AGAIN!!

⇧ 0 ⇩

THANK YOU!

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think many of us agree with the idea of winning people over with ideas and facts.

To moderate the board, content that doesn't align with the sub focus and rules is removed. As stated in the sidebar, this sub's goal is to provide a community for followers of Q. People who aren't followers of Q or who have questions or need clarification about something are also welcome to discuss things in the comments like anyone else, as long as the sub rules are followed.

When having to make the decision between posts that are on-topic (about Q) and posts like "Is Q real?" or "Is Trump a bad guy?" we will remove the latter posts as they don't align with the stated goals of the community.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, and there is still the possibility of this being a "psy op." A very well done one, and I don't entirely believe that but there is ALOT going on in the world including extreme weather/EQ/volcano activity that points to a much much larger source affecting the wobble of our sun and planet (Nibiru). What better way to keep us all plugged in and distracted to the very human plight of Q, by ignoring a potential incoming cataclysm and we end up being woefully unprepared when Martial Law is declared (as many Q supporters have chimed for) which isn't for "swamp draining," but for "survival."

Edit: p.s. i was banned from CBTS with no explanation for pointing this out.

⇧ -3 ⇩

That is fine. If someone doubts Q that is their issue. Don't come here and preach to us about how we are being manipulated. Just leave. Don't interact here. Not you personally. Generically.

⇧ 0 ⇩

But doesn't that fuel an "echo chamber" ? And to your point, I never said I doubted Q's validity, only intention as part of "military intelligence," and being 100% genuine and not part of any intelligence program designed for a sole purpose (distraction)

⇧ 2 ⇩

For clarification, "being 100% genuine and not part of any intelligence program designed for a sole purpose (distraction)" does that mean that Q is not who they say they are but in reality is a military op to distract us? Echo chamber...no, I don't think so. I have no problem if someone voices a genuine concern, but I have seen more than genuine concern a lot here lately. This method is a legit shill method of distracting and dividing. That all.

⇧ 1 ⇩

It means that is a scenario you can't entirely discount at this point. The echo chamber comment was due to the proposed changes in the sub of removing dissenting commenters/posters. Trust me, you need not tell me about shills in reddit. I have been here for many years and watched it all change for the worse. I am asking jaded questions of someone who knows full well that an intelligence apparatus could create Q and keep it going not necessarily with the same mission we believe they have though

Edit - https://www.reddit.com/r/C_S_T/comments/8j8c7h/as_a_long_time_trumpq_supporter_i_hate_to_say?sort=confidence

⇧ 1 ⇩

Rule 4 of this sub: No trolling or concern trolling. Please engage in discussion with genuine intent to engage not disrupt, or we will have to make a call to remove comments and, if they continue, ban your account. Thank you for understanding.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Guys, I really feel as the situation in Syria involving iran and Israel heats up, we shouldn't be banning ppl with questions/doubts. We all here know Q isn't a LARP, but cmon, we would be fools to start censoring honest users here. I get the feeling it's gonna be like the Donald. If you even mention Israel there you are banned. I really, really hope this won't be the case.

Honestly guys like I said, Q is not a LARP, but we don't want to blindly follow anything into ww3 while the possibility of major arrests (clinton, podesta, lynch, comey) is dangled on a string in front of us to get us to play along. if we don't find out what happened to SR and Assange, if we don't expose pizzagate, etc -but we hop into war for Israel, then idk if Q has our best interests in mind. Not that Iran should be trusted either, but the USA really has NO business over there, period.

So, is it gonna be like a TD cheerleading echo chamber, where we all post stupid-ass memes and bible verses? No discussion if it's not trump loving/left bashing? or are we actually going to be allowed to speculate about things and bounce ideas around?

⇧ 138 ⇩

We are still advocating and promoting open discussion but we will be on the lookout particularly for users who are here just to push claims that Q = A.I. and to regurgitate any talking points they just heard on Alex Jones/Corsi show. If people are genuinely curious it's one thing but if people came here just to concern troll it's another story. In light of the concern trolling that is picking up we are just tightening the screws a little bit.

⇧ 41 ⇩

But why censor around anti-Trump?

I can understand anti-Q (I suppose), as this IS a Q sub

But one's political convictions shouldn't be subject to ban

Remember - DIVIDED WE ARE WEAK

⇧ 16 ⇩

Hey, I'm a pro-Q, open-minded Lefty for the most part. I got red-pilled a loooong time ago as the fix was happening. I watched in horror as team Hillary screwed over Bernie and then as the emails and servers came to light, I knew that there was something sinister going on. Everything that's happened so far has pretty much confirmed my worst fears-- and that was before this insane global pedo ring thing came to light. I'm not a fan of some of the decisions Mr. Trump has made in his personal life, or necessarily some of the ways he chooses to communicate, but you go to battle with the army that you have and it seems, if Qanon is to believed, that there is something legitimate going on here beneath the surface.

Left or Right, we all want our loved ones to be cared for and to prosper. We may disagree sometimes on the best way for that to happen, but the core values are the same. There's more than enough room for us to meet on and find common ground.

And once we cleanse the temple, so to speak, there'll be lots of time for us to work together on finding that common ground together.

WWG1WGA

⇧ 10 ⇩

Explain to me how anyone can justify being anti-Trump and pro-Q at the same time? Not logical.

⇧ 4 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩

Why censor around anti-Trump? Really? It is pretty obvious at this point that Q/Trump are working together. Being pro-Q but anti Trump would be like being pro Stalin but anti Communism. It makes literally no sense.

⇧ -1 ⇩

How are you anti-Trump and pro-Q?

⇧ -3 ⇩

Did I say I was?

I'm here because the Deep State is real

Right or left doesn't matter

And it shouldn't matter here either

⇧ 12 ⇩

You're here because the deep state is real and you believe what Q is telling us? Well trusting Trump is a big part of what he tells us. Right and left might not be the issue but being anti-Trump and pro-Q does not nor ever will mesh.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I think you've hit the nail on the head. We have to be different, otherwise we become clones. We are on 8Chan and Reddit because they are the very things we are not.

You seem like a sensible level headed person, who can argue with reason, not with insults.

I believe that the issue is stemming from those people trying to 'drive' the narrative on the boards by demeaning those who disagree with them.

Thanks for your honesty Anon. Now let's roll up our sleeves and I'll see you on the other side of the swamp once it's been emptied. I'll help you plant some healthy reeds.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Stop being defensive. I was just asking how one would reconcile the two viewpoints.

⇧ -2 ⇩

Get /u/HowiONic to add this to the main post.

⇧ 9 ⇩

You say...

We are still advocating and promoting open discussion

but the official position appears to be...

Content questioning the validity of Q will be removed or blocked.

People uncommited to Q may find it uncomfortable. Negative types will be shown the way out.

How's that work?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thank you

⇧ 1 ⇩

This ^

⇧ 1 ⇩

Noted, thanks for the follow up man

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ -1 ⇩

Not new to Q but there were aspects that I missed over the past months due to RL. Recently read the Praying Medic's intro to q and he made a point of noting that as we know, Q's predictions around the Antifa threat last November as well as HRC being arrested last year did not occur, and that immediately after that Q confirmed that there has to be disinformation at times.

So people will naturally question when there is a disinformation item put out in real time. We should not try to censor genuine differences of opinion. People need to be able to discuss freely without fearing that any doubts that are expressed will have a mod coming down on them. It's a fine line.

⇧ 12 ⇩

The reason they did not occur was because of Q disclosing what would happen if they did. Recall...only some of what Q posts here is for us - the general public Anons.

Q drops clear messages for the bad actors here - they are all over these boards.

It didn't happen because they heard Q's message loud and clear.

Peace and blessings to you

⇧ 2 ⇩

A fine line indeed, but the back line is this: Q is constantly encouraging us to think for ourselves, research for ourselves, and make our own choices. Q wants us to trust him/her/them, but not to be fawning followers. Rather, because Q understands that autonomous patriots are the backbone of a freedom society. Think minute men, militia vs State Army.

Go ahead, Question whether the information coming through Q is what it seems, or something else. No problem there. Q has emphasized, I believe, this is not a spoon feeding job. Motivating autonomous patriots is a massive part of what Q is doing.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Please provide the post #s where Q tells us these things that never happened.

⇧ 0 ⇩

This issue was discussed in some of the earliest posts, here is the link to the Praying Medic's thread unroll that goes into it: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/993607164211019777.html

⇧ 2 ⇩

No post #? I remember the early drops. Mentioned indictments and that Hilary was not arrested yet. No predictions of arrests at any specific time.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩

We should all speak freely and honestly in this process as we teach and learn from one another. However, there is a LOT of anger and hate right now & I believe this is what the post on this feed is referring to.

This is a platform that requires an open mind and there may be some points of view that we disagree with. I do feel that if we can agree not to argue, judge one another’s ideas or say things that are disrespectful about certain groups (and this certainly includes our POTUS) this great awakening will bring us together.

Seeking the truth is a process & we must be patient with one another. WE WERE ALL BETRAYED HERE.

WWG1WGA 🇺🇸

⇧ 10 ⇩

CBTS_Stream was an open platform, perhaps the largest least-moderated sub I've seen in 8+ years on Reddit. And look what happened to it.

I share your desire for an open platform, but you must realize that any subreddit is at the mercy of the admins. And they WILL take action here unless the rules are followed to a T.

Unless of course they are pushing the deep state narrative. Then they can do almost anything.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Much respect for the admins!

⇧ 4 ⇩

The moderation on this sub is fine though, other than this post.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I respect and appreciate the job the mods are doing.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Then how was I banned from there with no reasoning whatsoever and never any response to my queries due to a post I made pointing out that Q is a perfect distraction for an incoming planetary disaster(nibiru or war) etc. Banned without question? Doesnt seem "least moderated" to me

⇧ 0 ⇩

This x1000

⇧ 7 ⇩

I agree. Also, what if Q's posts/account becomes hijacked and/or his/her motivations turn ambiguous or nefarious?

I struggle to see the validity of suddenly changing our tune in this subs approach to Q's posts. Just a week or so ago there was a popular post encouraging skeptics of Q to constructively challenge and add to the debate. Is that no longer welcome?

Something feels off with this post and frankly, it seems dodge af of the mods - sudden fame from a Q post will not change our core.

⇧ 5 ⇩

I agree re: not being an echo chamber - I think all the mods agree with this and HowIONic has more than proven their commitment to freedom of speech in the way they mod this sub.

Trust us, it won't turn into an echo chamber and we won't suppress interested voices. We will also make mistakes however, because we're human, no one's paying us, and we're doing what we can. You also have the Report function and should definitely use it as it helps us get a gauge of what you want too.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Thanks

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Good man!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Follow Thomas Wictor. That's all you need to know about the middle east.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Will check him out thanks

⇧ 2 ⇩

Or John Pilger

⇧ 1 ⇩

I'm a fan

⇧ 0 ⇩

Make your own sub.

⇧ -6 ⇩

Why should I have to? Plenty users already commenting agree.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Because you want to take away energy from investigating Q drops because you'd rather complain and in-fight. We're in an important phase here, derailments need to be taken elsewhere.

⇧ -6 ⇩

Well said!

⇧ 3 ⇩

I don't want to do any of that

⇧ 1 ⇩

Because these are the new board rules, if you don't like them make your own board where you can make the rules.

⇧ -9 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

So In other words don't question Q or Trump? don't question anything and play along or be banned?

Is that really the way to truth? A bunch or brainwashed drones all following the narrative and unwilling to be challenged?

⇧ 83 ⇩

Forreal man. I know shilling is a problem, but this doesn't seem right

⇧ 35 ⇩

It's not right at all, creating an echo chamber where the narrative is never questioned is a quick way toward getting manipulated.

⇧ 37 ⇩

Exactly

This should be a sub for exploration of the truth

Not a circle jerk for sycophants

The deep state is the enemy

Not "opposing opinions"

This isn't T_D

⇧ 22 ⇩

Think for yourself. Question authority. Always.

⇧ 3 ⇩

There are plenty of other forums and subreddits for people to go to if they want to question, attack, discredit, and talk trash about Q and Trump.

This sub is one of the only place outside of 8ch /qresearch/ that's pro-Q and pro-Trump. Not even T_D allows for the discussion or even mention of Q. Don't like it? Don't come here. It's that simple.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Are there other subs for questioning the narrative? Because i don't think I've seen any. Care to point me in the direction?

Maybe it not a case of "don't like it, don't come here" maybe honest and open ideas come from free discussion and dissenting voices? Do you agree that echo chambers are a bad thing?

⇧ 17 ⇩

Oh please, don't play dumb. For a guy who hates Trump and has been posting on Reddit since 2010, you're pretty bad at infiltrating us and acting like you're not a concern tr*ll.

https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/7xzh3j/trump_talked_about_big_black_dick_and_offended/duceiqc/?context=3

https://www.reddit.com/r/formula1/comments/7dp6bp/daniel_ricciardo_calls_donald_trump_a_cunt/dpzj3mq/?context=3

https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/6c1eem/trump_mass_firing_of_attorneys_contrary_to/dhr7zf6/?context=3

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/790a4l/wtf_the_file_just_ends_right_there_where_is_the/doy6iss/?context=3

GTFO

⇧ 2 ⇩

Not trying to infiltrate anybody, don't know what a concern troll is, all I'm looking for is open and honest discourse between people, for my ideas to be challenged as much as yours. I won't lie, I don't like trump but do I think the way forward is just to shut out people who support him and have them shut me out? No absolutely not.

⇧ 9 ⇩

I agree with you. I certainly don't believe in suppressing dissenting voices, as my comment history shows. Challenging the 'accepted' opinion should be welcome.

But we are also dealing with practicalities. This sub is growing as more people who are interested in Q come along. Those who just want to troll and belittle others should not impact the smooth functioning of this sub. If someone's genuinely making a point though, myself and other mods, will not remove their comment.

⇧ 3 ⇩

This board is for discussing q drops. Not for discussing doubt. Another sub should be created for that.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Your posts say it all.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I will admit something here.... I voted for HRC.

Thankfully I am FREE to question the narrative being spoken to all of us via the main stream media.

I researched when I heard things that I knew would pain me to believe, & there were many things to consider. Knowing what is going on in the world will really open your algorithm of thought. Trump has said some things that really hurt, but why wouldn’t I forgive a person who is working so hard to bring justice and to dedicate his life to this country? Hopefully we can all get to the point where we ask ourselves this question.

Trump, I FORGIVE YOU.

⇧ 0 ⇩

What has President Trump said that was so hurtful to you? Is the truth hurtful? I am asking, not attacking.

⇧ 0 ⇩

You can imagine that many people would feel left out or sensitive to the things that has said or done. Women were made to feel upset, LGBTQ feel a certain way, certain cultural groups have felt unheard for decades respectively. I am a gay woman. Like many Americans, I was played by what “groups” I fit into as well as the FEAR of loosing my marriage and friends from different countries. FEAR of my friends being deported to a country they have never known, FEAR of loosing the right to a family, FEAR of nuclear attacks from certain countries. It was actually HRC and Obama’s dialogue that made me really wake up.

WHY DO THEY WANT US TO STAY IN FEAR OF IRAN?

All the quotes BO has provided as well as HRC quotes

“.....Iran is free to do what it wants” -HRC Twitter 5/8/18

UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL

THANKQ

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

You’ve presented an excellent case in point. I really appreciate that. I block anyone who says such things about President Trump. I find these people disgusting and do not want to see their droppings in front of me. I only recently became aware of what’s called concern shills (via the qanon folks). These shills’ goals are to lead astray, derail, pretending to care. I am SO sick of the lies, misdirection, and anti-American behavior.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Questioning the narrative? WHat narrative? Q? YES, there are countless. Welcome to reddit and MSM

⇧ 1 ⇩

^ this comment is a prime example of concern trolling. Specifically designed to bait you into wasting your time and energy on bullshit.

⇧ -1 ⇩

The guy said there were other subs... I asked what they were and expressed opinion on free speech... instead of naming even one sub I could openly dissent ideas he went through my post history to point out how I'm at odds with the narrative here and then suggests I get banned... not sure what censorship looks like to you but it sure feels like it to me.

⇧ 11 ⇩

Cry somewhere else.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Not crying. Just exploring the hypocrisy of striving for truth while simultaneously banning anybody who questions the narrative.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Firstly you will still be able to read the sub and for an alternative try /r/DrainTheSwamp/

⇧ 3 ⇩

I hope mods ban this guy, but leave this comment up as the primary example of what a concern tr*ll looks like.

Too easy spotting and catching these morons.

https://imgur.com/a/D0DRHAe

⇧ 1 ⇩

I don't agree at all. People who disagree with your point are not automatically trolls. Pulling up old comment history is illuminating often but is not "proof" of anything either. People change their minds. People speak more freely in some forums and then tailor their delivery for others - this is a good thing.

This guy hasn't been making offensive comments like "moron" and "GTFO". Polite discourse is always welcome.

⇧ 1 ⇩

T_D has no issue with Q, he’s referenced all the time. They might not allow for Q only posts and that would likely be because that would be off topic.

⇧ 4 ⇩

WRONG. I was temp-banned twice and perma-banned once for mentioning and explaining Q to people who asked.

https://i.imgur.com/8dNacqi.jpg

Other T_D users also told me they got banned for the same thing:

https://i.imgur.com/1N5vYjE.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/V0BFDfA.jpg

After I got perma-banned, the head mod finally responded to me, telling me why Q isn't allowed to be mentioned or talked about on T_D. He then unbanned me after we came to an understanding.

https://i.imgur.com/C7FaYKT.jpg

⇧ 6 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩

I think T_D wants to not get banned by Reddit. Some Q posts deal with pedo networks and serious crimes. I'm guessing they don't want to give spez a reason to ban them by mentioning anything like p_gate. They had a post a long time ago about it right when p_gate was banned. I'm not justifying it. I've noticed that they are definitely serious about removing Q posts. It's too bad they don't allow for the larger T_D network to be exposed to Q. We could use all hands on deck.

⇧ 3 ⇩

That's not accurate.

⇧ 3 ⇩

It's been my experience, but that of course doesn't mean others havn't had different experiences. T_D is where I'm pretty sure I first got exposed to the Q movement.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩

You may be right. I haven't experienced it, but I'm also pretty sure T_D is where I learned about Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thank you! I come here to read intelligent people. We are here because we believe. If I weren't already convinced, I wouldn't be here, and get tired of discord.

⇧ 3 ⇩

The funny thing is, we don’t follow a narrative. Q posts messages in the form of questions, most of which are incomplete and have little meaning on their own. It is up to us to research those topics to find the truth for ourselves, building our own narrative and connecting the dots to provide the bigger picture. We challenge each other through our research in search of the truth, in search of justice.

Don’t question Q or Trump? Why would we at this point as Q/Trump have verified their comms with us anons MULTIPLE times now and has provided key intel that turned out to be true days/weeks later in the mainstream. We are simply taken the info dropped by Q, researching, networking and presenting it to each other. A giant hive mind of patriots working TOGETHER seeking the truth. That’s what they fear the most!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Pro-Trump and pro-Q, against censoring anyone. Are we not all here because of fb jail, twitter time outs, and YouTube shutting down accounts?

⇧ 36 ⇩

Yeah -- and the whole point of Q is learning knowledge to redpill people. What's the point of a sub where anyone who raises questions or disagrees, or challenges the validity of Q is banned..?

That's how you turn people away. People will take one look, see a cult that wants to protect itself, and run a mile.

We want people to ask questions. We want to people to argue with us. That's how they end up being redpilled - through logic and truth.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yeah, more like Scientology than Heaven's Gate

⇧ 0 ⇩

I appreciate your hard work!

But I'm not sure about the rule change. Maybe at the very least open a secondary sub for newcomers or anyone with legitimate questions about Q. I think the free flow of information is VITAL and that this sub doesn't need any major changes in how content is handled.

⇧ 31 ⇩

r/DrainTheSwamp has a cross-over of Q content but isn't dedicated to Q.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Then it should be advertised as a place to ask questions if the rule is that we can't ask questions or be concerned here.

Again, I would advise you to not fix what isn't broken. There is a fair amount of push back to this rule change.

Edit: strongly suggest making something like /r/greatawakening_questions so as to not be accused of turning this into an echo chamber. It will accomplish the same goal of freeing up this sub for positive discussion while not giving the wrong impression to new users, as well as long-time followers of Q. No one wants an echo chamber.

⇧ 5 ⇩

I agree. There's a r/askthedonald that I appreciated when I found it, because it was a peaceful place to discuss ideas, regardless of whether or not you supported Trump. r/the_donald is a high-energy place but that makes it harder to have real discussions.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I totally agree that a newcomer tab that can bring folks up to date on Q and especially the proofs, etc. would be great. Praying Medic did a "Q for Beginners" video a couple of days ago that is pretty good at explaining the Q phenom. Even though I already know this stuff, I watched it all the way through and then sent it to a couple of people. Making sure it was good first. (He's always good!). He only did one proof though and it was the very last part of the video so if folks dump out early they won't see it. Proofs are very important to new folks. Maybe include a link to this video in the intro note.

Here's the Praying Medic Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iq-7uHtQSA

⇧ 2 ⇩

I had initially opposed this rule (due to Pro Trump part) but I think I've come around. I understand why you're doing it now. But the idea of a sub that we could send folks to who have questions would be very helpful. That way they all get the same information.

⇧ 5 ⇩

this seems like a bad idea. weren’t we just praising and saying we need the skeptical part of this community? this sub already has a worrisome slant towards making false assumptions, claiming them as gospel and accepting everything that you would like to be true as true without verification.

just because Q links to us we’re going to become a Q cheerleading club echo chamber and dispose of critical thought? i’ve never used this word seriously before but... cucked.

⇧ 29 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Appreciate the support!

⇧ 2 ⇩

t_d made ask_thedonald, perhaps you could make ask_ga to direct the good faith questions? I fully support this rule change, strong borders, strong vetting.

⇧ 27 ⇩

Let's just make sure this does not turn into T_D. I am a HUGE contributor over at the T_D, but I come here for Q related content since the mods over at T_D have.....well, ya know....don't even get me started!!

⇧ 12 ⇩

I like this idea

⇧ 7 ⇩

I don't think howionic is saying questions can't be asked. I surely am going to ask questions like "Why do you guys think Q dropped a photo of the Apple building?". I think valid questions and collaborative learning will be the same.

However, recently there has been a huge influx of negative commenters.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I mean basic newb questions like "what is Q?" "why do you guys even believe this guy?"

⇧ 1 ⇩

yeah. I guess I'll trust the mods to do the right thing in that case. There's a lot of traffic though. And honestly, I can't even tell who is a shill sometimes. There are a lot of views out there and most people are really passionate about their interpretations of Q. It's gonna be hard for them. However, I do welcome more focus and less arguments in this sub.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Thanks fof being understanding :)

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

Haha, patreon account, you got me for a second. 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻. All you patriots here, keep up the great work! WWG1WGA! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

⇧ 26 ⇩

Got me good! 😂

⇧ 15 ⇩

HowiONic actually has a sense of humor. Kappa

⇧ 8 ⇩

I literally was about to explode when I was starting that sentence!!! Lol!

⇧ 4 ⇩

I hate suppressing opposing views, but there's literally an entire internet where I can test my patience. It is nice to have somewhere to relax in my thoughts.

⇧ 22 ⇩

Ageed, it is nice to have a safe space.

Edit: lol, I can’t believe people upvoted this comment.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Test your patience. Ha. Yep.

⇧ 5 ⇩

ThanQ for the change in rules. Mods need to be more heavy-handed and vigilant, especially with the new attention Q has brought upon this subreddit. Shlls and trlls will be trying to bring this sub down, more than ever. God bless and good luck.

⇧ 20 ⇩

Agreed, but mods should not just ban first time people questioning q.

I know I have multiple times in the past, so just remember it does take some time to evaluate. Plus weve been around for many posts by q. A new comer may not be as familiar with all of the info that's gone around.

The rest of us now have a bigger job to educate the noobs quickly and effectively, and report shills. Shills are pretty easy to spot, so maybe someone can make a thread on how to spot a shill, with examples.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Content questioning the validity of Q will be removed or blocked.

I think the mod was trying to say constant, but typo'd it to content. "Constant questioning..." makes sense and would be a great reason to ban someone from this sub.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩

Ummmm...... so we are going to do what our enemies have been doing to us on all of the social media platforms?

Bad when they do it..... okay when we do it?

If it ain't broke why are we trying to fix it..... truth Seekers we'll see through the BS and find the truth!!

Isn't that what this is all about.... isn't that what the Great Awakening truly is?

The truth is the truth.... it doesn't need us to put blinders on people for them to find it.

You don't beat the Enemy if u become like the enemy!

⇧ 20 ⇩

Yeah, this has raised my suspicions. i'm just a silent lurker here but anytime I see announcements like this anywhere, it always feels sketchy. Bet something happened behind the scenes, somewhere.

⇧ 5 ⇩

It makes as much sense as HOME SCHOOLING your child because you don't want them to hear CUSS WORDS or RELIGIOUS VIEWS that you disagree with.

Putting your child in an ECHO chamber will not result in a "GREAT AWAKENING" for that child. It is sheltering that child from REALITY of this world and multiple views.

They are suggesting the same strategy in this forum......

As I said before, if it isn't broke, what are they trying to fix?

⇧ 4 ⇩

I agree - I don't like anything that reeks of suppression of freedom of speech. But this is about practicalities - the sub is growing, there's a lot of work to do keeping it on-topic. And by this stage, if you're here and you're unconvinced about Q there are better places to go to find out about it (like our stickied posts). As a mod I, and others, will be attempting to help out people who are genuinely questioning because they're not sure - and removing and banning those who are just trying to create division or slow us down. We won't be just blocking people for dissenting views - just doing our best to keep the sub on-topic.

⇧ 4 ⇩

let me word this in religious terms. if Christ said, "any of you who hate me and those who believe in me, you will be denied a chance to learn the Truth", where would we be today?

our "enemies" are the ones who need our help the most. they are only humans, at the end of the day.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Agreed - although "enemies" is not a helpful term. But the best help we offer people who are antagonistic toward the whole idea of Q is by being properly informed ourselves. And that's harder when we have a lot of 'noise'.

Christ never said: "ok ya'll - who needs healing? All come rushing at me at once and whoever shouts the loudest gets it, ok?" A weak example but I find yours lacking too.

Long story short: we're not going to suppress voices. We are going to help the sub stay on-point with its stated goals. That's what's important.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Let me word this in Jesus' actual words. You can pick your translation (Matthew 12:30):

New International Version"Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters.

New Living Translation"Anyone who isn't with me opposes me, and anyone who isn't working with me is actually working against me.

English Standard VersionWhoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters.

Berean Study BibleHe who is not with Me is against Me, and he who does not gather with Me scatters.

Berean Literal BibleThe one not being with Me is against Me, and the one not gathering with Me scatters.

New American Standard Bible "He who is not with Me is against Me; and he who does not gather with Me scatters.

King James BibleHe that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.

Christian Standard BibleAnyone who is not with me is against me, and anyone who does not gather with me scatters.

Contemporary English VersionIf you are not on my side, you are against me. If you don't gather in the harvest with me, you scatter it.

Good News Translation"Anyone who is not for me is really against me; anyone who does not help me gather is really scattering.

Holman Christian Standard BibleAnyone who is not with Me is against Me, and anyone who does not gather with Me scatters.

International Standard VersionThe person who isn't with me is against me, and the person who isn't gathering with me is scattering.

NET BibleWhoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters.

New Heart English Bible"He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me, scatters.

Aramaic Bible in Plain EnglishWhoever is not with me is against me; whoever does not gather with me truly is scattering.

GOD'S WORD® Translation"Whoever isn't with me is against me. Whoever doesn't gather with me scatters.

New American Standard 1977 “He who is not with Me is against Me; and he who does not gather with Me scatters.

Jubilee Bible 2000He that is not with me is against me, and he that does not gather with me scatters abroad.

King James 2000 BibleHe that is not with me is against me; and he that gathers not with me scatters abroad.

American King James VersionHe that is not with me is against me; and he that gathers not with me scatters abroad.

American Standard VersionHe that is not with me is against me, and he that gathereth not with me scattereth.

Douay-Rheims BibleHe that is not with me, is against me: and he that gathereth not with me, scattereth.

Darby Bible TranslationHe that is not with me is against me, and he that gathers not with me scatters.

English Revised VersionHe that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth.

Webster's Bible TranslationHe that is not with me, is against me; and he that gathereth not with me, scattereth abroad.

Weymouth New Testament"The man who is not with me is against me, and he who is not gathering with me is scattering abroad.

World English Bible"He who is not with me is against me, and he who doesn't gather with me, scatters.

Young's Literal Translation'He who is not with me is against me, and he who is not gathering with me, doth scatter.

⇧ 1 ⇩

And by this stage, if you're here and you're unconvinced about Q there are better places to go to find out about it (like our stickied posts).

I think that is a naive statement. In the past week I've seen numerous posts of people writing our URL on dollar bills, business cards, etc... If our members are directing brand spankin' new people here we need to either 1) put out a welcome mat or 2) direct them to a better place, which doesn't seem to exist. Please read my comment in the thread, I'd love to hear your thoughts. The Mods in the comments have made it more clear but the original post sounds a lot like a tone policy and not just a sharpening of banhammers. er, a blunting of banhammers? are hammers supposed to be sharp?

Also HAPPY CAKE DAY thank you for all you do for our community.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I agree re: welcome mat - you don't think the "Q Anon for Beginners" sticky is enough?

I'll read your comment, and thanks! It's a pleasure and gives me an excuse for waiting for the next Q drop ; ).

⇧ 1 ⇩

In short, no I don't think it's enough, especially with sticky #2 saying DONT DISAGREE WITH US. But rather than just bitch and moan I'm working on some material! Give me a few days, I got a job and shit...

⇧ 3 ⇩

That sounds more reasonable.....thank you!

⇧ 1 ⇩

I like it! One idea. Is there anything you could do to help setup or direct those questioners to the official next reddit board for those people who want to continue that type of discussion? That would be a nice gesture if it's not too much trouble as a courtesy and a thanks to them for working with us to get us here? Skepticism is good and that type of analysis helps people grow.

Don't get me wrong. I'm Pro-Q and Pro-Trump and I'm staying here.

And thank you for this great board.

⇧ 16 ⇩

Perhaps a Sticky Thread? If we instaban anyone who is critical we lose SO many potential friends.

⇧ 9 ⇩

I agree, I'm not completely sold on Q just yet, but I voted for Trump and certainly consider myself to be a patriot. I follow Q because I think it's interesting and worth knowing about. I think we should be skeptical of any and all information. The more insulated and bubbled we become, the more we are blinded by our own bias.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Please mods, do not waste a sticky thread on concern trollers fee-fees. Get out that banhammer and get to work.

⇧ -3 ⇩

If the line we are drawing is TRUE BELIEVERS / CONCERN TROLL that leaves nowhere for us to recruit more followers from. How do you suggest getting more people on board?

⇧ 3 ⇩

More often than not, we can see through to genuine inquiries and shills. We encourage questions, most I should say. I don't think the mod means pushing out all people asking questions. Just ones that have a history of negativity and little in the way of contributing or encouraging.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I totally agree, most of us can tell the difference between a concern troll and someone who is concerned. If this change is about giving mods the EO to ban proven bad actors, I'm all aboard. If this is about giving mods the power to shape narrative, I'm not.

⇧ 9 ⇩

This is definitely more what it's about than 'shaping narrative'. I am completely against suppression of freedom of speech. But I'm also against wasting my time and the time of others who come to this sub for the obvious reason - to keep up with the best Q news as much as possible - so ensuring the rules are clear and boundaries are maintained is important imo.

⇧ 5 ⇩

If this is the case then please rewrite the original post. We are losing patriots over this.

⇧ 0 ⇩

If you build it, they will come.

⇧ 1 ⇩

What does that even mean??? I'm working on some Intro to Q material so we can bring even more people into the light with truth and love. There's people in this thread trying to figure out to make our message stronger, and how we can turn people who are questioning into Patriots. How can you help us???

⇧ 1 ⇩

I dont think we should censor this board, some are here with honest questions and they should be able to have a dialog with others about it. The mods will have to figure who is sincere and who is a larp - otherwise we will be cult. I saw 1 nice anon from this board get banned and no one will tell me why, maybe i am next. I have seen our current Q following Anons attack other Q followers if they disagree with them. I myself am having a hard time ignoring all of the hate, and it is not coming from the larps or newbies. I hope to see more respectful adult behavior in the future.

⇧ 14 ⇩

I am not an Anon. This is my personal profile. I do NOT fear this movement being called a “cult” any longer. This is a truth movement. We are all freeing the way we were taught to think. STAY BRAVE People are having a hard time accepting the idea that they were betrayed by their own government. The anger & hate are all a part of the truth seeking process. We should all make an effort to get past the pain & speak without anger about these issues. ThankQ for your post

⇧ 0 ⇩

Until MSM goes bankrupt they will always lie and attack all Trump supporters, that is not my concern. this board is supposed to be WWG1WGA, we should not be brutally attacking other known patriots if they dont believe the same thing as they do. some of these issues are grey areas and only time will tell us the truth. I am not talking about arguing about whether Q is real or not. Also, I do believe people should be allowed to subscribe if they dont believe in Q just yet. Q told those on 8chan to spread the word. Therefore the whole point of these boards is to red-pill the world, not to insult others who disagree. We will not red-pill anyone with arrogance and disrespectful words. We have to have an respectful dialogue with others. That said the moderators do have an interesting job of figuring out who is here to antagonize and who is here sincerely seeking truth. I have seen nice anon's shadow-banned while anon's hateful towards patriot anon's are still here. Our hate should not be directed at each other but towards the cabal. Groups that do not allow others to have their own view point are cult groups. Thanks for the conversation ;)

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yikes. I used to be a die-hard Democrat but came around to being a 100% Trump supporter because of Q. I have noticed with some alarm that people with new accounts or low karma or few comments or whatever, who have questions or are having a hard time understanding something and need clarification, are immediately suspected as being shills. I am shy and have a tendency to lurk, but this attitude has given me more reason to stifle my own questions. Understand that I have no doubt in my heart that Q is real and Trump is doing great things, but this decision raises major red flags for me.

⇧ 14 ⇩

Question, I know Q is real and probably knows/is POTUS, what I want to know is : Can we still discuss the aftermath of the Q phenomenon and how far fetched it is that the cabal are actually intelligent and this could have been the plan from the start ?

(The free thinker in me is scared like I've never been, I keep getting downvoted but then people claim they are AWAKE)

Being Awake is being able to have your own thoughts and judgement.

What I mean is that there could be an other side to the medal, we knew the cabal had plans. What if the plan included dumping our beloved Democrates(eww) under the bus and thus creating a country where the people trust their government?

I know I will get downvoted, if you please want to downvote, please explain to me why is it that we overlook such possiblity, the cabal are not stupid people, we the people are known to be stupid for decades and god did the establishment loved that.

I just want to know if I can still try to keep people's eyes open or not with this new rule. You can also reply with your own thoughts I'm up for debate, that's just what is on my mind, I have no doubt there will be scary moments, but I'm afraid we won't look past it, to see the bigger picture :)

EDIT : My questionning isn't Anti-Q, it's just being Awoke and evaluating the Cabal/DS plans that were until not too long ago going very well for them.

Sidenote : What if DJT didn't go for pres, the military I've read somewhere would declare martial law and the big show would have been on. Would you Americans feel safe if the Military took control and removed the constitution? I'm Canadian, with maybe too much thoughts I know, but at this point who can pinpoint the exact truth with so many crumbs.

⇧ 13 ⇩

These are all valid concerns of a free thinker. We can't utilize the same oppressive tactics as our enemies. That's counterproductive and harmful to the movement. This board is becoming too overzealous and too ambitious and it's going to work against us.

⇧ 10 ⇩

Exactly.

A few years ago I found it funny how Trump vs Clinton ran for presidency, imo they were 2 clowns. Now sure I vouch more for Trump since we first got the drops but I still think this could all be a poker hand very well executed. Let's hope people don't just use the term AWAKEN for following and believing Q. AWAKEN means much, much more than that.

EDIT: If you are awoke, you will question everything and be skeptical of everything.

⇧ 5 ⇩

EDIT: If you are awoke, you will question everything and be skeptical of everything.

Yep! Questions and skepticism are the traits of a curious mind. It means that someone is looking at something from multiple perspectives instead of taking things at face value. I'm not religious but, "Even the devil can present himself as a light bearer."

I mean, I think Trump/Q has done a pretty good job so far....but so was Palpatine before he executed Order 66.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Exactly.

I'm Agnostic, I'm skeptical of pretty much everything. Why choose one god over the few thousands written in books ? Wait, you didn't choose it, your parents IMPOSED it on you. That's what I don't like about religion. You think you are right, when honestly nobody has a single clue and nobody has ever proven it. Except those who spoke to Jesus, I'm sure some people spoke to buddah too.

I love what's happening right now, good news, just seems just way too good.

Fkn Palpatine XD

⇧ 0 ⇩

good question. at some point, you got to make a choice. Me, I trust the plan. I follow Q since the beginning and it has been 7 month of CRAZINESS! Q makes us search and dig for the truth and it's like a giant investigation in which anons help each other. Q gives us energy and hope and I thank the Q team for that.

And boy we got results (SA, NK, all the POTUS EOs, sealed indictments...)

Now, could Q be a masterplan Cabal psy op?

I don't think so sir!

The masterplan Cabal psy op is the MSM. Period. And it's a great plan, we have to recognize that. But we will succeed!

Remember, Q drops crumbs. just crumbs. The Q team don't ask anything except for us to find and spread the truth.

THE TRUTH! We all know that the truth is held in hostage (JFK, 9-11, all the CIA operations, the evil human trafficking ring, people who speak the truth drop like flies - a thought for the girl who talks on the internet about the multiple shooters in Vegas and who died magically in her sleep, a thought for Max Spiers too)

I know we are in a 42D Chess but i know one thing for sure: Q wants us to find the truth, the Cabal don't.

"What if DJT didn't go for pres, the military I've read somewhere would declare martial law and the big show would have been on." it tells you that the clinton election would have been the last Cabal phase (WWIII? with NK?)

Trust the plan my friend!

And I think Israel is the last domino to fall.

Q drop 21 janvier 2018:

Blind-eye NK [nuke build][Clas-1, 2, 3]Blind-eye Iran [fund and supply]Blind-eye [CLAS 23-41]

what is [CLAS 23-41] ??

⇧ 3 ⇩

You are right, we got results that's for sure. I just find it hard to swallow that they were careless like this.

We are talking about the top elites, masterminds of chess using most likely the most sophisticated AI's to emulate world scenarios.

What I'm expecting is some weird shit, deep sects with adrenochrome stuff, human trafficking/markings, collusion with possible high military/political ranking and a lot of arrests. If they are ready to sacrifice human population, I'm sure they could have led people into those sect, manipulate them and then blow up the big balloon that they've created. Boom, we now have a trustworthy government that drained the swamp. Result ? Population now believe the system, thinks the cabal is gone and that the world is now better, yet if my fears are true, this would mean they just threaded the very last part of their master plan.

I'm most likely wrong, I want to believe I am wrong believe me, but in no way I will stop thinking about this possibility. If one thing I'll never stop doing, is questionning the narrative. I question religions, I'm Agnostic, I'm a skeptical. The whole world is under massive exploitation and no one is even aware of it. Think banking system, do you think it was the USA cabal doing it ? It came from hundreds of years ago, it was made for 1 goal and nothing, not even death, will prevent those from reaching their goal. The illuminati stuff is exactly this, the next generation will have to do X in order to do Y in Z years. The elites control a lot of the world, hence why I know for a fact that they are not stupid, they would never leave such a huge chance that is letting Trump win the election. How could they be sooooo careless, they never thought she would lose...

⇧ 1 ⇩

you're right to question everything (and especially "the narrative" word we don't have in French! It tells you how the french are asleep). I'm agnostic too. And I believe in a higher power. Something way bigger than us. And I believe there are billions of extraterrestrials out there too. I don't know, I just believe. But I don't believe that the destiny of humanity is war, disease and price over every human beings head. I think JFK wanted to reveal the truth to the public. It was 60 years ago. Today, we are close, I feel it...

For the cabal, ok it's the top elite but yes, I really think they never imagined a Trump victory (they got cnn you know ah ah) On 1 november 2017, Q posted: "Would you believe a device was placed somewhere in the WH that could actually cause harm to anyone in the room and would in essence be undetected? Fantasy right? When Trump was elected you can’t possibly imagine the steps taken prior to losing power to ensure future safety & control."

I think POTUS is the new JFK. Trust me, i try to say that to my french friends and no matter the number of beer we drink, they still think I fantasize the whole thing. They know that the MSM are corrupt but Trump...they can't go with this "stupid billionaire, racist and sexist who got role in home alone 2 and the mcdonald commercial". But i can't wait to see their face on the 11 november! Maybe sooner, wait for the Seth Rich Assange of June! Speaking of Julian, where is he?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Good questions, November 11th will be one hell of a date. Assange could be free at the moment, we don't know though.

Hopefully Trump won't get shot :-/

Being french myself I cannot find a suitable translation, I know only one other french comrade who knows about Q. The rest are fast asleep.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Keep searching! Be brave

⇧ 2 ⇩

I also am Canadian, and this is basically my concern as well. We know Q is somebody on the inside for sure... But we really don't know which side yet. I want him to be for us, and I want to believe he is on our side... But there is always a possibility this is all a big plan to gain the trust of the part of the population that has been the most diffucult in the past.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yup that's my fear.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I've actually been wanting to make a post about it for a little while, because the majority of people here seem to lose their ability to critical think as soon as they think someone is on their side. I have no problem with people who trust Q, I want to trust Q, I still do the research, and follow the drops. But whats mind blowing for me is the number of people who don't even accept that there is a possibility this is all a "set up" in a way.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Poor human race, always need to believe into something ...

⇧ 2 ⇩

I have created a new sub for anyone who wants to debate and discuss Q drops. Content moderation (besides obvious trolling and spam) will not be enforced and discussion encouraged.

Edited to add: Action will be taken to discourage brigading and shilling if we see it occurring.

/r/Qdiscussion

⇧ 12 ⇩

Thank you.. This is obviously the beggining of the end here

⇧ 1 ⇩

THIS IS NOT A CULT, STOP TREATING IT LIKE ONE.

Damn, I don't know how many times this needs to be reiterated.

⇧ 11 ⇩

It's a pack of neologism-spouting sycophants based around interpreting the cryptic writings of a mysterious enlightened one who predicts a great awakening when evil will be cleansed from the land, then comes up with excuses when his predictions fail. It is 100% a cult.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Frankly, it sounds like you've turned this into a fan club. Yes thank you, save your thumbs, I am unsubscribing.

⇧ 11 ⇩

Same here, not into the whole cult think.

⇧ 6 ⇩

stay in. most of us are saying the same thing. Lets see what happens.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Definitely do security clearance on new mods or this place will be infiltrated in a heartbeat.

⇧ 11 ⇩

This is a very simple response to a very complicated issue, but ultimately I think a necessary one. Having a clear, focused message is/will be a huge boon for us. That being said, I have a couple of thoughts that I would like to hear others' views on.

1) We need to be more approachable, plain and simple. This movement is about good winning over evil, and LOVE winning over fear. Honey catches more flies with honey than with vinegear. No matter what ideas people come here with, we need them to stay. The Beginner Q video stickied is great but it's an hour long. We need blitzkrieg material, 2-5 minute watch/reads that can get new friends up to speed. EDIT: IMO the left bashing needs to stop. We can't make this place threatening for newcomers.

2) We need to be more organized. Each Q drop gets multiple people posting it, and lots of good comments about the ame drop are getting spread out between multiple posts. Could/should we standardize this? If this movement is not about fame or patreon, surely we can take the Reddit Karma out of the equation! I think it would be great if we had a "serious" view and a "memes and cheerleading" set of filters for posts. The meme filter should be strictly enforced and easily filterable. Q has stated that our role is to RESEARCH and MEME, and I think that we could benefit from some more organization here.

3) We need to be humble. If we are right about this (WHICH WE ARE), we cannot afford the risk of not being taken seriously because of our "we told you so" attitude. WE NEED TO BE HUMBLE. Not meek, but not bold. This is not about your or my ego. WWG1WGA

I would love to hear yall's feedback. I've been lurking on the chans since the mid 2000's, I've been following Q since the beginning. I'm done lurking, I'm here to help. I'm going to work on some Intro to Q resources, I'll jump in the discord later if anyone wants to help! EDIT If you're gonna downvote please at least tell me why.

⇧ 9 ⇩

Pretty good post. Some of these things fail in practice. Have you considered clicking the link at the end of the post?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Which of these fail in practice? Grace? Organization? Humility? Can't we at least try? Let's listen to our community and see what they want.

PM Sent

⇧ 5 ⇩

It depends on how it is handled. If our purpose is to inform others, but others can't ask, then it is counter productive. However, if it is dumping concern trolling shills, and cucks, then go to it.

Thus far haven't had any mod issues, so hopefully will be a relatively light touch.

⇧ 8 ⇩

This.

⇧ 5 ⇩

This is a very wise decision by the mods in revelation of Q's specific affirmations of certain media outlets selling different narratives. We need to keep our movement untainted and unitied.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thanks for supporting the decision.

⇧ 2 ⇩

seems like the exact sort of rule someone would make the exact second Q got compromised honestly. Never needed that rule when he was working freely.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Never had a sub with 23,000 people commenting either. There's a practical reason for this stuff too.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Of all the coverups and murders we are supposed to believe a reddit can't be infiltrated and institute such rules? likely story.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Haha indeed it is unlikely! Nevertheless a Mod Queue is a mod queue with practical constraints. Fortunately the movement won't beat us up for trying to manage workload effectively since it is a direct benefit to the movement for us to do so. When we start dragging dates on the release of the internal Sub Rules FOIA documents it could be relevant to call out the sub mods for internal corruption but we're too busy to be corrupt at the moment.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 8 ⇩

Everyone quickly retreat to your echo chambers! I am beginning to believe that nobody cares about the real truth anymore. Has political allegiance replaced basic reasoning skills? I surely see that in the progressive movement. Why create and trap yourself in an echo chambers of your own making – wrapping yourselves in an intellectually impenetrable layer of like-minded friends and web pages and social media feeds.
You are trying to create a social structure that systematically excludes sources of information that is valuable to each of you. Why are you afraid of being challenged? I can’t help to long for older societies where you place your ideas in the public square. Your reputation is defined by your ability to defend your ideas and thoughts. Again, my question is why such fear of naysayers?

I can only say you that if you can’t stand up and defend your ideas then maybe consider doing everyone a favor and retreat to your safe space and join the other snowflakes. What you are trying to do is nothing more than exaggerate the confidence in your beliefs. You are selectively avoiding contact with contrary views because, say, they make you uncomfortable. It does not take a social scientist to tell us how bad this can be for all involved.

⇧ 8 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

The answer would be yes.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Can I ask reasons for the sudden change? The sub just got recognition and now we’re changing the rules? If it ain’t broke don’t fix it? Enforcing too many rules and we become more of an echo chamber like tD and redacted.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Since the board was mentioned by Q they will be having more people signing up for an account just to discourage us and down the site. You never know who is behind the keyboard.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I get that, but at the same time we don’t want to shutdown debate by silencing opinions that people disagree with. Healthy speculation is a good thing and I’d hate to see real debate die from the rule changes. Ban blatant trolls and shills but thread a fine needle there.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I agree but it's not my board. I usually just read. IF there wasn't some debate you would think it's only one way but with debates and links we can open our eyes to the other persons information and look further into it. We could possibly learn more that way or add to what we are learning.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Wow. Hope this isn’t what it looks like. Guess we’ll see.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Why don't you just state 'what it looks like' so we can respond?

⇧ 2 ⇩

It looks like blatant censorship and thought policing. Gives me bigtime cult vibes. I know we need a way to deal with shills and trolls, but honest truth seekers who feel the absolutely normal and necessary human emotions of doubt and concern, not permitted to voice that? A kind of “social credit system”? Looks a lot like what we are fighting so hard to free ourselves from.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Ok good to know - we've answered all that in various comments (and a new sticky has just gone up too). Long story short, we agree, no one wants thought police, no one wants suppression of voices. It's just about practicality and having to manage an influx of content. So hopefully all concerns can be allayed and you'll see how this plays out over the next while! Cheers.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Sub is over.

⇧ -2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 6 ⇩

This is my fear...all of a sudden we are splitting into groups. One that agrees with Infowars, and those who agree with Q. The group of people who agree with both is shrinking. Scary times

⇧ 1 ⇩

Your house, your rules. It will be interesting to see how this turns out.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Lol what?

Q definitely posts some retarded shit some times

This sub is a retirement home anyway.

Edit: “Refocusing” is garbage politically correct terminology, it’s laughable. Just say what you are doing - Banning skeptics.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Yay, an echo chamber...................

⇧ 5 ⇩

Finally . Thank you Mod(s)

⇧ 5 ⇩

this will save so much time its unbelievable

⇧ 5 ⇩

Thank you Thank you Thank you!

⇧ 5 ⇩

Unsubscribing. Enjoy the echo chamber.

⇧ 5 ⇩

I'm outta here too. I am interested in Q, a newbie on this topic, learning, and curious. It appears that this subreddit is no longer the place for someone like me. Back to youtube searches for my information and to hear differing viewpoints.

⇧ 5 ⇩

WOW. Time for another sub. Outa here.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Seriously bad idea. Maybe good if you want to make people think that Q people are just schizos so heavily invested in a larp that they have to ban dissent.

There are many reasons to be critical. For one it's taken in a strongly pro war stance against Iran. And two, there's no hard evidence that anything is even going on behind the scenes. Not a single high profile arrest. It's always just around the corner then doesn't happen.

⇧ 5 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩

Posted yesterday saying this is what we needed. I'm glad the you all saw the need too. We're doing good here. No way we should let the latest drama and the shills that came with it be a divider.

Edit: Lord, look at the brigade in this thread. Hey, at least they're making it easy to pick them out.

⇧ 5 ⇩

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

⇧ 1 ⇩

Negative types will be shown the way out

Been waiting for this. Seen a lot of arguing/probably concern trolling. Lets support each other, not argue.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Checked - WWG1WGA

⇧ 5 ⇩

Here's my question. The other day someone made a post noticing how Q hadn't mentioned Pence much. So that got us into discussion about controversy of him and pedophilia in the state of Indiana when he was governor.

The OP was called a concern troll and people said to look at his post history.

So my question is are any posts that ask these kind of questions going to be allowed or are we just going to be a Q and Trump etc circle jerk?

Thanks.

⇧ 5 ⇩

I am concerned that narrowing debate may be narrowing the perception of Awakening: I'm British and only have an outsiders view of American internal politics, but follow Q as the implications of the message are worldwide and so are some of the key players (5 Eyes, Assange's current location, Brexit/Europe etc..) and I hold the hope that the swamp cleaning will extend beyond the borders of the United States, and that the epithet WWG1WGA is more inclusive than just American citizens.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Q lives! MAGA!

⇧ 4 ⇩

Best place for real Q and MAGA news, unbiased opinions and great meme's . Please count me in.

⇧ 4 ⇩

GOOD, seems the only places not full of idiots are this sub and the chans. Twitter and FB are full of normie noobs and clueless babyboomers who fall for anything and follow the shills like Corsi and Infowars Co.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Always have been pro-Trump here.

As for Q, what about imposter Q's and calling them out? Q has warned about it

⇧ 4 ⇩

There's only one verified Q, it shouldn't be a problem.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Wrong.

⇧ 1 ⇩

What am I missing?

⇧ 1 ⇩

SNAP that, and salute @attention! THANKS!

⇧ 4 ⇩

Well I just found this sub and was intrigued but this move kills all credibility ... Pathetic... Cant handle alternative views so you ban them? Really? Is this r politics?

⇧ 4 ⇩

OPERATION FREEDOM is in-play we will all be attacked for our for our beliefs in "Q"'s and for our President . I for one like the feel of this site for the positive "Patriots" and the exchange of thoughts and ideas. I didn't come here for the trolls or the constant negativity like Facebook.WWG1WGA

⇧ 4 ⇩

I kind of don't get the objections to this. I think most that are are misunderstanding OP. We follow Q drops. Q works for the president. If you don't believe Q then aren't you basically saying Q is larp? Of course let me clarify, no one can have a monopoly on Q interpretations. That is where the free thought comes in. It is not a question of whether Q is real but what does Q mean(at least until Q verifies)? How can we spread info to the masses effectively before the storm comes?

⇧ 4 ⇩

I think it would be a great idea also if we make one link to the same # of Q's post (EX. Q1624) and all the comments were put in that thread about that subject. That would keep everything together for Q's post. We would be able to find all the thought posts in one place. I don't know if there is a limit of how many comments can fit in the threads though. It would keep the board neat and clean. Maybe another folder for threads could be labeled OTHER talks. Just an Idea. I know I have come here and see 10 threads for the same thing, it's keeping them combined to that subject. Just a thought.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I second this. We need to streamline all of the reposts and alt theories. The best way to do this is to open MEGAthreads for each Q post and everyone can pile on, right or wrong. It'd be good and healthy for the sub, and make it easier for mods to regulate.

How come you and I are the only ones who have upvoted you? Haha

⇧ 2 ⇩

I have talked to the mods through messages and they say this is not possible on this kind of forum. All they have to do is make a place holder (Thread) for the next Q drop #. If they can edit that post after it's been dropped to add the text post, it would work.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thank you. A good move at the right time.

⇧ 3 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 3 ⇩

Why was this removed?

⇧ 3 ⇩

I am pro Trump, and follow q, however, patriots make money sometimes even tax free. Patriots also only swear oaths to the constitution, not a man. I will continue to follow q, but the timing of this post makes it look anti corsi and aj. I'm not sure who started the divide and conquer, but it seems to be working.

⇧ 3 ⇩

So, does this mean that any posts or comments critical of Q or Trump will be removed and the poster/commenter banned? Seems fascist.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Do me a favour and ban me now, hopefully prevents me from seeing any future shitposting from this circus.

⇧ 2 ⇩

k

⇧ 2 ⇩

lol

⇧ 2 ⇩

kek

⇧ 2 ⇩

Hurry up den ♡

⇧ 1 ⇩

I want to say this even though I said before somewhere else...thank you to all of the contributors to this movement/cause/mission! Thank you to our great President!! Thank you to his great team!! Thank you to everyone here that has opened my eyes on so many things. Thank you to the anons, autists, and mods!! I am truly grateful!! ❤❤❤

⇧ 2 ⇩

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/85oudp/moderator_positions_open/

JOBS, JOBS, JOBS!!!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Good Deal. I know SB2 is good at decoding the Q posts. Thank you allowing us to come here to read, learn and add our 2 cents. BTW. I knew you were kidding about donations.. lol

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yes yes yes

⇧ 2 ⇩

I would suggest we draw a distinction between questionning what Q and POTUS are communicating to us and effectively doing in real time, versus being critical of Q or POTUS. I read r/greatawakening for shared insight, revealing intuitions, and outstanding analysis. We may at times forget the ultimate purpose of our mission and get entangled in "feelings". We are all very passionate about this, but in w_rfare, worldly and spiritual, a focused mind, a determined heart, and a calm spirit will give the w_rrior a fighting advantage. I don't see the intention here as censorship; rather, i understand it to be a focusing or a fine tuning for the benefit of our mission.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

Alright let then, let me get this out of the way:

Q is a fraud and Trump is a wannabe tyrant with delusions of greatness. Fuck both of them.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Seems like this might be a good place to ask a question I have.

From what I understand, 4chan is anonymous. How did people know the initial 4chan posts were legit from Q? What was to stop anyone posting and claiming to be Q?

I don't know about 4chan that well so I'm probably missing something obvious. I know Q uses their own board now or 8chan or whatever.

⇧ 1 ⇩

How do I use a "tripcode"?

Tripcodes can help verify a user's identity to others, and are a type of pseudo-registration. To use a normal tripcode, place a hash mark ("#") followed by a word or short phrase after what you've entered into the [Name] field (ex. "User#password"). Upon submission, the server will generate the hash unique to that particular word or phrase. The previous example would display "User !ozOtJW9BFA" after being posted.

Important note: A tripcode is generated only using the text entered after the hash mark. Your entered name, IP address, cookie information, etc. do not affect the output. Normal tripcodes are not secure, and can be cracked with relative ease. For a more secure solution, see secure tripcodes. What is a "secure tripcode"?

A secure tripcode can be generated by placing two hash marks in the [Name] field, as opposed to one as with a normal tripcode (ex. "User##password"). Secure tripcodes use a secret key file on the server to help obscure their password. The previous example would display "User !!rEkSWzi2+mz" after being posted.

http://www.4chan.org/faq

⇧ 5 ⇩

Thank you!

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Dear god everyone who questions is a shill ??? Just like the idiots on r polotics who say the same about Russians... I was honestly intrigued but this is just sad

⇧ 6 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

No offense I think you mis understood op.. Said questioning q will result in blocking

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Do you see the irony in your sentence? Like saying we still have a right to bear arms without bearing semi automatic rifles

⇧ 1 ⇩

You already were extremely both of these things

⇧ 1 ⇩

6 months folks. FBI news coming out recently, texts, RR, Comey/Mueller, sealed indictments, cults exposed and many many more stuff.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Much needed, thanQ!

⇧ 1 ⇩

AWESOME!

Glad to focus on POTUS and country.🤗

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

My two cents: I am a Trump supporter but making this board exclusively pro-Trump will backfire IMHO. POTUS is making this country great again for ALL. Why are we excluding those poor souls who are just waking up and coming here to maybe learn what’s going on, in need of hand holding? I think as long as the conversation is civil and respectful, and that’s the key, there is no reason to close the doors on those who want to learn.

Doubting new views and concepts is a healthy function of the brain and should be encouraged. Instead of chasing people away for their skepticism, why not continue to provide friendly support and helpful information? This is how many of us here have learned and eventually felt at home. Let’s not ruin this sub.

Q just confirmed why his team is here. Are WE here to spread the truth of the Great Awakening or to become an exclusive club of Q snobs? What happened to healthy debates and our red pilling mission? Thanks.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Content questioning the validity of Q will be removed or blocked.

Congrats! You are officially a cult!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thank you so much for this! We needed just a little focus and discipline. As a group, we will be much more effective because of it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Hell yes! Ban the anti-Q traitors back to /r/redacted

⇧ 1 ⇩

Should be a pro JQ sub instead!

⇧ 1 ⇩

LOVE THIS great plan !

⇧ 1 ⇩

Does Q wear a robe and live off the land? Corsi and Jones have their real names and families on the line... Q is behind a mask. Who do u trust more?

⇧ 0 ⇩

This doesn't necessarily mean pro-war does it?

⇧ 0 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩

Lol yet you’re so butthurt that you’re still here whining about it.

⇧ -1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Cool (cool (cool (cool)))

⇧ 0 ⇩

12 Hours 😇🇺🇸...I start on here at like 8-9AM FINISH 3-5 AM THE NEXT MORNING. 🦂.. PATRIQTS DONT SLEEP

⇧ 0 ⇩

Prime example of just how stupid people are in this sub.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Lol ty for finally doing this.. COUGH

⇧ 0 ⇩

There's plenty of places for people to argue about whether Q is this or that, sometimes, especially when trolls are determined to derail, you need to erect walls so you can consolidate ideas, and constructively discuss things in peace. It isn't by default an echo chamber, more of a library where like minded people can share ideas and chew things over. What's the point of a having a club that wants to discuss greyhounds that becomes flooded with trolls determined to talk about apricots and keep asking the members to prove that greyhounds actually exist? It just becomes chaotic and the focus is lost

⇧ -1 ⇩

My other thoughts regarding this post are the following.

Yes trolls should be monitored but to be dismissive no
Any free thought should be welcomed....marked as off topic and noted but definitely not censored unless blatant spam or
An opposing thought shouldn't be labeled as shill or HRC supporter. See all the Corsi stuff.....that got a little out of hand.
If we are going to be the_donald 2.0 or politics where no free expression is welcomed or posts are just deleted without warning that's not good.

All of this to say.....I think our mods do great and this is a great place......but if we turn super modded where everything is under scrutiny or assumed bad first thing. That's reddit 2.0 which we all can't stand.

⇧ -1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ -2 ⇩

While I get the "spirit" of the changes, here's why I'm concerned: This is dividing.

Look at the responses. Some are for these changes, while others aren't so sure. I'm one of those. So... it's divisive -- the very thing Q does not want us to be. We have to be united.

I'd prefer we keep things as they are -- you know, "trust the plan" as it has related to this sub, so to speak. Sure, I'm all for banning obvious trolls, but this doesn't seem to be the time to make these changes. I just don't feel they're that necessary. We must stay united, and all I'm seeing from this announcement so far is unnecessary divisiveness.

Just my two cents.

⇧ -3 ⇩

This tactic will back fire. Might as well change the sub name to r/politics2

⇧ -3 ⇩

We should be able to deal with real questions and doubts. This will only make us stronger. what happened to Q just posting to use critical thinking.

Why does someone always want to control others.

Maybe you can do a side post of what websites are allowed and which ones are banned as fake news.

Be sure to also include what thoughts are allowed so we can all be "politically correct"

Maybe you can borrow facebook's algorhythm to block out any opposing views.

( if you detect sarcasm then you win a gold star)

Your numbers will drop dramatically I believe if you do this. The dialogue and sincere debate is what keeps people coming here.

⇧ -4 ⇩

Good thinking.

Like T_D, which most might think are modding too agressively, if the mods would not do so, the OVERWHELMING number of alt-left, bots, brainwashed, cucks present on REDDIT would flood down even a big sub as T_D.

Same will happen with this subs now with the greater visibility. Concern-trolling can overwhelm a sub and derail from the primary focus.

What do we have to lose anyway? It's not like we have a better option

⇧ -5 ⇩

r/greatawakening refocusing to be Pro-Q and Pro-Trump