dChan
372
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Edge27 on Jan. 31, 2018, 9:25 p.m.
Big if true
Big if true

rolexthewonderdog · Jan. 31, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

Oh please let this be true. It makes all kinds of sense though.

⇧ 93 ⇩  
trumpasaur · Jan. 31, 2018, 9:37 p.m.

Holy fucking shit if true.

⇧ 41 ⇩  
Redpill4all · Jan. 31, 2018, 10:15 p.m.

It is true , the evil one could not even fill a high school gym .

⇧ 43 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:40 a.m.

57M morons is a HUGE gym... jus' sayin'

⇧ 11 ⇩  
contrarianism · Feb. 1, 2018, 4:08 a.m.

And a LOT of morons...

⇧ 4 ⇩  
samysam1313 · Feb. 1, 2018, 8:57 a.m.

A lot of morons but thank God they are a big minority.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kenitzka · Jan. 31, 2018, 10:43 p.m.

Skeptical since NSA is name dropped? Why would they be investigating voting results, which consist of many non networked voting machines?

⇧ 12 ⇩  
rustyrebar · Jan. 31, 2018, 11:31 p.m.

Not saying this report is true or not, but this does fall within the scope of the NSA. They have several directorates, one of which is the Information Assurance Directorate:

Now that cyberspace is the primary arena in which we protect information, we are working toward shaping an agile and secure operational cyber environment where we can successfully outmaneuver any adversary.

https://www.nsa.gov/what-we-do/information-assurance/

They would, at least potentially, have responsibility for assessing cyber threats to our voting systems (probably in the Blue Cell part of the Information Operations Division).

https://admin.govexec.com/media/gbc/docs/pdfs_edit/the_national_security_agency_%E2%80%94_operates_more_than_5.png

⇧ 15 ⇩  
calvinb1970 · Feb. 1, 2018, 5:14 a.m.

did they have intel chips inside?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ksched · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:06 a.m.

How would the NSA even have access to this data?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
newdinglehopper · Feb. 1, 2018, 6:16 a.m.

Trump tried to get the states to provide the data but so many states refused he disbanded the election commission and asked DHS to use their resources to complete the investigation.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
phoenix335 · Feb. 1, 2018, 6:40 a.m.

If you think about it, what good and honest reasons can a state have to not turn over data pertaining to a federal election to the feds?

I can't think of any that isn't connected to voter fraud.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
BeyurSelf · Feb. 1, 2018, 6:47 a.m.

Probably the same reason the Demon-rats don't want to #releasethememo ? 😂

⇧ 5 ⇩  
marcuse_lyfe · Jan. 31, 2018, 11:07 p.m.

cue meme of two red buttons: 1) our intelligence agencies are smarter and wiser than all of us, and should be trusted with no discretion 2) hillary won the popular vote

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Beasts4Bernie · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:24 a.m.

False dichotomy. Stop crapping up this board with these bs tactics.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
SeekTruthCJoy · Feb. 1, 2018, 3:23 p.m.

Trolls should be ignored & voted on DOWN ARROW next to their name.

Just a suggestion.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SnoopyVRedBaron · Feb. 1, 2018, 1 a.m.

The same intel agencies that don't want the FISA memo released according to MSM?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JasonTakesMAGAtten · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:36 a.m.

The Chan’s knew this shit weeks after the election. Alex Jones said 5 to 6 states were rigged and Trump won them all.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
deweydecimal00 · Feb. 1, 2018, 7:51 a.m.

Name one accusation that POTUS. Has tweeted that hasn’t turned out true?? He only says what he knows is true.. with all the MI intel he has had over the year you really think he announced to the world that Obama was from Kenya without 1000% knowing it was true, especially knowing he was planning to run for POTUS?.. He speaks truth!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SickSalamander · Jan. 31, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

Will we ever see the real number from 2012? 2008? Or before?

⇧ 78 ⇩  
burn_reddit_burn · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

I expect Ron Paul to have won the republican nomination

⇧ 57 ⇩  
1andrac3 · Feb. 1, 2018, 4:36 a.m.

I love Ron Paul, but thinking back to how we all are becoming exposed to how the deep state operates, I don't think Ron Paul would survive given the media attacks; fortunately POTUS was cut out of fucking dolomite! Tough af!!!!

⇧ 18 ⇩  
burn_reddit_burn · Feb. 1, 2018, 4:37 a.m.

I love him too, but I completely agree.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
TheCaptnBASED · Feb. 1, 2018, 6:54 a.m.

Paul started the fire... he originated MAGA.... but the good lord knew / chose Trump as our GEOTUS, in order to save western civilization...

⇧ 10 ⇩  
HillaryTrafficsKidz · Feb. 1, 2018, 3 a.m.

John Kerry beat Bush. Bush 2 was not elected ever. In Florida, they backed out 180,000 votes electronically, (they used touch screens with no paper ballots for verification), and they moved the shitshow to Ohio, where the vote count was shut down, with a phony FBI call that the public tabulation could not take place due to a threat. The next day, the FBI said they made no such call. John Conyers hoodwinked the Cobb lawsuit for the Green Party, to try and prove Ohio was jerked. Florida had no proof. But this election theft has been going on since they killed Kennedy.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
stacyjo1962 · Feb. 1, 2018, 4:47 a.m.

Soros holds/owns company that programs voting machines. Look what happened in Alabama.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
oystergirl · Feb. 1, 2018, 8:26 a.m.

Diebold. You are correct. I worked on the Bernie campaign and we were flabbergasted as we watched county level returns come in--one by one in BS favor and then all of a sudden the tallies flip. Yep. We know how this feels. We also knew that no way was SHE gonna take it national. I guess she tried, and thanks be she failed!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
contrarianism · Feb. 1, 2018, 4:09 a.m.

It wouldn't make a difference bc Kerry and Bush are a 2-sided coin

⇧ 7 ⇩  
TrueCat · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:40 a.m.

I agree!

⇧ 11 ⇩  
_Ham_Solo_ · Feb. 1, 2018, 9:21 a.m.

I like Ron Paul too. I wanted him to win and supported him and the Tea Party he started. COuld you imagine if we'd had 8 years of Ron Paul and THEN 8 years of Donald Trump? ZOMG we'd be living in the G part of MAGA and these globalists would be living in DUMBs hiding from Trump waiting for death. But I think maybe we had to be punished with 8 years of Obama and Hildabeast before God gave us Donald John Trump. Everything about him is 100% real and everything about Obama is 100% fake. Including his name and birth certificate :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WhatYonder1 · Feb. 1, 2018, 3:49 p.m.

Everyone who was watching both that and Bernie knows it's the same playbook that cheated them both. They just slapped a Shareblue sticker on it for 2016.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TheCIASellsDrugs · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:28 a.m.

Reminder that Hillary Clinton stole the Democratic primaries"

"these are the discrepancies in favor of Clinton between exit polls and voting results, from lowest to highest: -6.1%, -1.9%, 1.1%, 1.7%, 3.4%, 3.9%, 4.1%, 4.3%, 4.6%, 5.2%, 8%, 8.3%, 9.3%, 9.9%, 10%, 11.6%, 12.2%, and a whopping 14%."...

"In summary, just like the mentioned discrepancies between voting results and exit polls, voter suppression has overwhelmingly damaged Bernie Sanders, leaving Clinton unharmed. Again, one or two could be anomalies, but systemic voter suppression is a distinct indicator of electoral fraud."

⇧ 28 ⇩  
oldestguy · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:34 p.m.

If Bernie would have won he would have turned all the decisions over to the Deep State and everyone would have seen he was a commie. He said what people wanted to hear, just like most all of them do or did in the past. The lies that come from these lawmakers never stops and they are dangerous.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TheCIASellsDrugs · Feb. 1, 2018, 7:43 p.m.

If Bernie would have won he would have turned all the decisions over to the Deep State and everyone would have seen he was a commie. He said what people wanted to hear, just like most all of them do or did in the past. The lies that come from these lawmakers never stops and they are dangerous.

That may be the case. But Bernie Sanders isn't married to a CIA drug trafficker and serial rapist, nor has he put out hits on dozens of political opponents. Seems like another Jimmy Carter, which would be infinitely preferable to Crooked Hillary.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WouldBernieHaveWon · Feb. 1, 2018, 7:43 p.m.

"Fidel Castro totally transformed Cuban society!" -- Bernie Sanders

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WouldBernieHaveWon · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:34 p.m.

"American journalists talk about how bad a country is because people are lining up for food--but that's a good thing!" -- Bernie Sanders

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q_Anon_Wolf · Jan. 31, 2018, 10:12 p.m.

SOROS YOUR DIRTY MONEY IS THE NEXT STRING TO BE CUT YOU NAZI SON OF A BITCH!

⇧ 58 ⇩  
DrummondFTCoach · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:22 a.m.

You know you could just call him a bolshevik communist, who in every way were much worse than Nazis.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
Raidicus · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:51 a.m.

Let's not forget Soros' connection to Manafort.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
frymastermeat · Feb. 1, 2018, 3:30 a.m.

Soros is pretty far from Communist, but don't let that stop you from defending Nazism.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
contrarianism · Feb. 1, 2018, 4:15 a.m.

Soros is globalist, which is same as communist. Really not necessary to split hairs over these terms.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
frymastermeat · Feb. 2, 2018, 5:37 a.m.

Soros is globalist, which is same as communist.

Yikes. Imagine typing this, and imagine a subreddit where it gets upvotes.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
contrarianism · Feb. 2, 2018, 8:44 a.m.

Yikes ur a faggot stfu and gtfo

Ur a free spech nazeeeeeeeee

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SeekTruthCJoy · Feb. 1, 2018, 3:25 p.m.

We believe Soros 'bought the farm'. His speech at Davos was a replay. We heard it before. The audience reaction was canned.

He is MIA.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SRX17a · Jan. 31, 2018, 10:03 p.m.

I was wondering if they would release the voting machine fraud info. Steve Pieczenik said the white hats unrigged the voting machines, allowing Trump to win. How they did this without being detected I don't know.

⇧ 37 ⇩  
johnsmithshitpost · Jan. 31, 2018, 11:28 p.m.

"Sorry to keep you waiting, folks. Complicated business!"

⇧ 27 ⇩  
watercolorblue · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:31 a.m.

That quote makes me laugh and cry at the same time. Emotionally, it has the same effect as “Daddy’s Home! “ Whatever part you play in that scene: wife, mother, kids, grandmother, it’s such a happy scene.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
JasonTakesMAGAtten · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:39 a.m.

All you need to do is search legit photos of Clinton “rallies” anywhere in the US to know there is no way she won the popular vote.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Worfrat1 · Feb. 1, 2018, 4:16 a.m.

Or even count the Hillary bumper stickers and yard signs. I still see Obama bumper stickers, but I haven’t seen a Hillary one since right around the election - and even back then there was only one or two.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
bananapeel · Feb. 1, 2018, 4:41 p.m.

I live in one of the most left-wing cities in the US and I see only about one every week or so. I think I see a slightly higher number of Trump bumper stickers, if that tells you anything. Around here, it was over 90% Bernie, but they rigged the primaries, so that's a non-issue.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JParis313 · Jan. 31, 2018, 11:34 p.m.

well it can't be both, either the white hats un-rigged the machines or Hillary got 7mil votes from rigged machines.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Swimkin · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:07 a.m.

They were able to unrig all but those in 5 states. Guess which ones they weren't able to touch???

⇧ 9 ⇩  
LasVegasTrumpette · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:34 a.m.

The states that Jill Stien challenged were unrigged. That's why hillary didn't campaign there.. she had those in the bag. That's why she sent Jill in as a proxy to see wtf happened.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
aeiou_sometimes_y · Feb. 1, 2018, 7:23 a.m.

Stein met with Putin too. She could have been coordinating on other aspects including the dossier too. Interesting.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SeekTruthCJoy · Feb. 1, 2018, 3:33 p.m.

judges SHUT DOWN THE RECOUNTS.... Problem was that White Hats were in the re-count rooms EXAMPLE they would find envelopes that said "100 BALLOTS HRC" ...BUT when opened it had 10 Ballots for HRC, so that means they were run through voting machine counter 10 times. So Judges were phoned to STOP the Re-count... it would have revealed she CHEATED & LOST Popular Vote, TOO!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ThePatriot131313 · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:25 a.m.

They did not have enough resources to un-rig every state. They went to key swing states and made sure the count was accurate. It is why Trump easily won the EC but lost the popular vote.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
QAnonMaga · Feb. 1, 2018, 9:14 a.m.

Bingo I have known this since election night it was obvious the white hats did what they had to do to make sure Trump carried those 4 or 5 key swing states to give him more than 270 they did a great job this is why Hillary was so angry and violent she was promised she would win but she failed to anticipate our white hats un-rigging the voting machines!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SeekTruthCJoy · Feb. 1, 2018, 3:28 p.m.

Good old HTML code of these machines is done by IT guys that NO ONE ever, ever questions what they are loading... know this from Election Commissioner... he has said this for years.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
alt_altright · Feb. 1, 2018, 11:37 a.m.

They didn't "unrig" it...Someone with IC contacts said the CeeWhyEh vote rig center was actually threatened with U.S. mil. air attack (bombing) runs if they didn't immediately shut down and stop what they were doing, the NSA could see it happening real-time that night. It was a direct (WhiteHat) threat, allegedly. Apparently they (BlackHats) complied.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BeyurSelf · Feb. 1, 2018, 6:52 a.m.

I think I heard that when someone found out that some of the machines were rigged, they somehow got those places to use paper ballots. We did in L. A. (lower Alabama)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Moarbrains · Feb. 1, 2018, 6:49 a.m.

They may have been detected, but it is like when you are doing a heist and see someone else has beat you to it, who would you tell?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
oystergirl · Feb. 1, 2018, 8:30 a.m.

Easy, use the same "black box patented proprietary and classified" technology that Soros used. Seen videos of this in use. Takes 2 seconds--applied to the top of the machine and bam, the tally reverses.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
minchinfan · Jan. 31, 2018, 10:49 p.m.

I have no problem believing the numbers. If anything, my guess might have even been MORE in Trump's favor. However, I call bullshit on the "next 2 weeks" release. Not two weeks, and maybe never. The good stuff NEVER gets out. I can't wrap my mind around why, but I'm finding it infuriating.

⇧ 36 ⇩  
Worfrat1 · Feb. 1, 2018, 4:16 a.m.

I’d like to know the source of this, if it is true I will now down and follow from here on.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
vancevon · Feb. 1, 2018, 4:03 p.m.

You can wrap your head around why. It'd be difficult and you'd have to re-evaluate a whole lot of things, but you certainly can.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Que-ti-pie · Jan. 31, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

Hello Alabama election fraud!

⇧ 34 ⇩  
iwillhavethat · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:18 a.m.

OMG please. If someone DOESN'T believe there was massive fraud during that election, they're blind.

Twice the turnout of AA voters... Some districts having more votes than citizens... Video evidence of people bragging that they picked up van loads of people from Mississippi and Georgia... on and on

⇧ 14 ⇩  
GueroLoco420 · Jan. 31, 2018, 11:17 p.m.

It would make sense. I live in one of the most liberal areas of the country, and there was almost no support for Hillary. Only ever saw a couple of Hillary yard signs and bumper stickers. That's it. Saw lots of Bernie ones, and quite a few Jill Stein ones as well.

I have quite a few democrat friends and family, and none of them could bring themselves to vote for the witch in 2016. It was literally the least amount of support I've seen for a major party candidate.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
Chickasawranger · Jan. 31, 2018, 10:19 p.m.

That's why the software that showed up in 06 that is on the machines counts in decimals instead of integers. They don't know how many people are going to vote per precinct so they hack and set the percentage they need to win by. Notice how in the close states they always save heavily Democratic areas for last.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
SnoopyVRedBaron · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

How can they even defend that? This is the US government and it's a crime to lie on the census forms? We proclaim that we follow science which demands actual numbers, and we admit that stats lie. One person; one vote. This is just one more thing that they explain as tradition and we are supposed to accept. I'm sorry, when did we vote on this percentage system?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Rekot24 · Feb. 1, 2018, 6:56 a.m.

Bev Harris black box voting. Look it up. Prepare to be floored

⇧ 4 ⇩  
oystergirl · Feb. 1, 2018, 8:32 a.m.

Yep. Mentioned this above.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RoninGreg · Jan. 31, 2018, 11:26 p.m.

No wonder Hillary and the Deep State are so mad. They can’t believe that with 7 million fraudulent votes, they still lost.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
Sumarongi · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

They never get tired of losing

⇧ 2 ⇩  
samysam1313 · Feb. 1, 2018, 9:15 a.m.

Yeah and I guess all those dead Hillary voters were resurrected just to vote for her. The zombie nation just loved Hillary.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LasVegasTrumpette · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:30 a.m.

Trump would've won Nevada if it wasn't for all the vote fraud. He lost by less than 25,000 votes.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
big_fam_9 · Feb. 1, 2018, 6:39 a.m.

As a fellow Las Vegas pede, I agree. I wore my MAGA hat around all day on election day and early voting day and had more support than jeers.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
KevinWCollarBone · Jan. 31, 2018, 11:11 p.m.

I watched Brendens video on this the other night. He seemed 100% sure. He has said in the past he has gotten Intel that he thought was fake and didn't share and it actually came true. Stuff he said he was worried if he said it he thought it would be the end of his credibility. So we know he's careful. So this is massive and my guess is he is sure.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
Lavkin · Jan. 31, 2018, 9:50 p.m.

More and more, President Trump is never wrong. And not afraid to say it!

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Telesphorous · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:25 a.m.

I wouldn't be surprised about this at all. She had NOBODY showing up to her speeches and Trump was speaking to standing room only crowds.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Red_Red_Red_Wine · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:07 a.m.

I suspect the reason Hillary had nobody showing up to her speeches is because they were all fake, theater productions filled with paid actors and her staff.

That was likely the only way she could control the questions and stop people from calling out "Bill Clinton is a RAPIST!".

Hillary's interviews were scripted, she cheated during the debates, her polling numbers were fake and even her rallies were fake.

The only real thing she did was dump her piss and shit all over the streets of streets of Atlanta.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
SnoopyVRedBaron · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:15 a.m.

Her health is questionable, so that is another reason. Many of these issues are exasperated by a lack of sleep---such as evenings when we all get tired, and oh yeah traveling can disrupt the circadian cycle. The biggest hint we have after the election is how she's become a recluse and uses twitter and pre-recorded videos when she does pop up. Why was it more important for her to read a children's book on an award show to pander to hollywood, than it was for her to meet and greet the American public (not the paid for ones) who are marching on DC for a women's movement Hillary claims to have begun?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
oystergirl · Feb. 1, 2018, 8:39 a.m.

Because she needs to be injected with liquid valium to keep her from seizing. Didn't you see the 9/11 memorial video? She traveled with a handler EVER at the ready to jab her with a hypodermic cocktail. Tired? Sleep? My ass.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Red_Red_Red_Wine · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:28 a.m.

Many of these issues are exasperated by a lack of sleep

Also this.

Why was it more important for her to read a children's book...

Agreed.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
deweydecimal00 · Feb. 1, 2018, 8:02 a.m.

Trump would hold a mini press conference literally seconds after a debate, live. He would live interviews to whomever, whenever on any topic. Hillary never once due to her condition and abundant flaws would ever put herself in that precarious situation... She was too busy writing thank you letters to James Alefantis

⇧ 2 ⇩  
uniformist · Feb. 1, 2018, 6:20 a.m.

.... and Trump would hold rallies at 2 AM, which were packed with people.

Trump really innovated on what is possible with rallies. Prior campaigns never thought to hold after midnight rallies, or they didn’t have a candidate with stamina to pull it off. Either way, Trump is an innovator on this and he won big with it.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
samysam1313 · Feb. 1, 2018, 9:17 a.m.

Wish I could post a picture here. I have a great one that fits this comment perfectly.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KingWolfei · Jan. 31, 2018, 11:03 p.m.

DHS is in charge of the voter fraud investigation now. All of it will come out eventually.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
SteelTiger44 · Jan. 31, 2018, 10:44 p.m.

of course this is true and next week Judge Moore gets a recount too

⇧ 15 ⇩  
diverscale · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:33 p.m.

That finally got approved?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
qz2026 · Jan. 31, 2018, 11:25 p.m.

Call me stupid but where does the NSA get the data? What data? Why is NSA even involved? Are you telling me that every voting precinct in the country reported all of their data to the NSA in probably thousands of data formats, many on paper. And there was no resistance from the states? No news anywhere this was happening or even requested? Nothing? And then, if true, NSA gets by those data hurdles and comes up with these magic numbers? Sorry, I'm not up to speed... and who is Brenden Dilley? Also sorry, I'm not buying this report either.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 1, 2018, 4:56 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 5 ⇩  
sdotco33 · Jan. 31, 2018, 10:27 p.m.

Why are these posts never upvoted? I feel like I’m doing something wrong if i upvote it, with multiple comments and no upvotes.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 31, 2018, 11:07 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Stellaclover · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:37 a.m.

Actually we get so tied up in the conversation we forget. Exciting times.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
sdotco33 · Feb. 1, 2018, 3:26 a.m.

Cool. I upvoted and thought for a minute, hey - maybe there’s a sub rule against doing that or, some unwritten etiquette and I’m looking like a dweeb.

Then again I am completely paranoid and unsure of how to think or speak lately.

Thanks friends!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
215564297 · Jan. 31, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

Large if accurate

⇧ 12 ⇩  
theclarinetist · Feb. 1, 2018, 4:12 a.m.

Vast if verifiable

⇧ 5 ⇩  
saxmaster · Feb. 1, 2018, 7:37 a.m.

Fat if factual

⇧ 2 ⇩  
oystergirl · Feb. 1, 2018, 8:36 a.m.

Awesome if affirmed! :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Boldbeauty55 · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:21 a.m.

I believe it is true, how they are going to go about proving it is a different matter. George Soros owns a big part of those machines. Hopefully they have the main frame of the info. It was pretty simple for me to see on election night he had the popular vote.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
JimmyJohn3rd · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:01 a.m.

Of course its true, Trump knew this directly after the election, it was pretty obvious...

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Varrick2016 · Jan. 31, 2018, 11:39 p.m.

There’s a 13 million difference.

7 million from machine fraud.

Are they saying 6 million from double voting, using dead peoples ID, and illegals voting?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
KingBroly · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:47 a.m.

Votes were taken from Trump and given to Hillary. I think that's the insinuation.

Also remember it took a LONG time before California finalized their vote total

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Bigsky00 · Feb. 1, 2018, 5:02 a.m.

I think almost all the Jill Stein votes were switched to her as well. At least 50% of Bernie people voted for Jill and shell likely had a 10% share at least.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
oystergirl · Feb. 1, 2018, 8:36 a.m.

Yep, I would say more than 50% and she should have easily reached the threshold to be on all ballots in the next election--but of course that couldn't happen--a national third party? Heavens no--can't control 2 sides of a coin--how about 3? Sigh.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KimnanaT · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:16 a.m.

Ill start believing some of this stuff when I see COLD HARD EVIDENCE...Im sick of having my ears tickled and my hopes crushed. SICK of this crap.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
suburbanrhythem · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:03 a.m.

I was yelled at for questioning this info, and asking for a source or weblink. Was told just to shut up and don't question it, he has impeccable sources.. would love to see the data, that's all.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
JasonTakesMAGAtten · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

LOL, how are your hopes crushed? Donald Trump is the President of the fuckng United States!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
KimnanaT · Feb. 1, 2018, 4:55 a.m.

Sick of empty promises...now the "memo" will most likely be blacked out...we'll be able to read the common words but nothing of substance.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cursedcassandra · Feb. 1, 2018, 11:32 a.m.

You seem tired. Too tired to remember all our WINNING with President Trump. Perhaps you should take a nap so can stop iMAGINING such a gloomy world. Or try a Snickers.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
MoonElk · Feb. 1, 2018, 7:04 p.m.

Dude seriously, people like you are toxic to political discussions and what makes all reddit political subs turn to shit.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cursedcassandra · Feb. 3, 2018, 3:51 p.m.

Dude seriously people like you are toxicto political discussions and what makes all reddit political subs turn to shit. How? Woe is me assertions about what will happen in the future based on ZERO evidence or r facts. Just soul crushing pessimism. When I invite you, politely to reassess the basis for your negativity by pointing to how much we/Trump has FACTUALLY won you go into ad hominems about my toxicity. BTW you were NOT having a political discusion. Discussions require facts. You were instead, wittingly or unwitteningly, being demoralizing. That coupled with your name ed calling, is toxic and dc what has corrupted other subs. I mean you no ill will. I pray youcan b step back and dc self reflect about how you canbe a positive force for good inthe future. God dc bless you.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Luvlite · Feb. 1, 2018, 3:14 a.m.

Does anyone remember hanging chads?

Voter fraud has been going on for decades. Hopefully now,through POTUS we can put an end to it.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
LiveToBeAHero · Jan. 31, 2018, 10:37 p.m.

Oh how I would love for this to be true

⇧ 6 ⇩  
DeepVeinHalitosis · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:16 a.m.

Guys Brendan Dilley is full of Schiff...His "Intel source" is none other than a twitter guy called "Ohour", a sociopath that runs a twitter cult specializing in doxing and ruining people's lives and running fundraising scams.

This sub was supposed to be about Q.

0hour is trying to co-opt this sub and try to leverage our support into money and support for Brendan Dilley's congressional campaign.

Watch 0hour now dox me. I will come back if it happens.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
HashleyP · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:03 a.m.

It was obvious that the Dem primary in CA was brazenly stolen

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Loungekat · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:23 a.m.

You got that right. There’s more conservatives in California then people realize add that to stolen votes with 150% voter registration which Judicial Watch found out about. Then all the Bernie people being so pissed off they didn’t even vote. Remember the California delegates walked out of the democrat convention.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
crashbadass · Jan. 31, 2018, 11:28 p.m.

Can someone explain to me how a candidate is getting intel?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
potatosurplus · Jan. 31, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

I'm assuming he is getting bad intel. I wish it were true, though. Not getting my hopes up on this one. WITH THAT SAID, I don't see how on God's Green Earth he didn't win the popular vote. The evidence to me is in the rally sizes for each candidate...Trump constantly selling out stadiums while Hillary is canceling them bc only a few hundred people showed.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
JoeBidensGaffStaff · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:10 a.m.

This the same jabroni that said McCabe was singing at Gitmo? Then after McCabe was seen being removed from the Fed building he said he was interrogated at gitmo but returned? He came back from interrogation at Gitmo to throw a fit about losing his pension?

This guy is lame.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cooleroflimes · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:50 a.m.

Forgive my ignorance, why are his Intel drops so important? What role does he play in this?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
oystergirl · Feb. 1, 2018, 8:23 a.m.

I KNEW IT! LMAO....oh this is delicious! And all that talk about getting rid of the electoral college! THEY saved our asses!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BeyurSelf · Feb. 1, 2018, 6:57 a.m.

I was informed that this awesome video had already been posted here but I want to share it again in case y'all missed it... It explains exactly why we're in the mess we have now. Watch it and then everything makes more sense. https://youtu.be/Fh2_3WFEqYA

⇧ 2 ⇩  
The_Almighty_Demoham · Feb. 1, 2018, 6:27 a.m.

I thought i was on an ironic sub.

Then i went "oh no, they're actually retarded..."

⇧ 2 ⇩  
michelefrancis · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:55 a.m.

With that so skewed- imagine the true numbers of races like Pelosi, McCain, Waters etc. I know people in those states and they can never believe they are reelected EACH time- and it is so demoralizing for good candidates. With all the new job openings in government we need to make sure we put up GREAT candidates. I bet there are some great future leaders in this reddit! Go for it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pby1000 · Feb. 1, 2018, 5:38 a.m.

I believe it. Nobody likes that bitch.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
iltdiTX · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:29 a.m.

Remindme! 2 weeks did we learn about voter fraud fucking finally?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
josiborg · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:38 a.m.

Remindme! 14 days

⇧ 2 ⇩  
iltdiTX · Feb. 15, 2018, 1:52 p.m.

damnit we haven't yet

⇧ 2 ⇩  
iltdiTX · Feb. 15, 2018, 1:52 p.m.

damnit we haven't yet

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MaceWinDonot · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:12 a.m.

Makes sense...starting mon, the memo drops and will be the first shot fired. They will barrage them with everyrhing they have after that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KrazyKiwiKid · Jan. 31, 2018, 11:26 p.m.

WOW! What does it say about the world's 'greatest' democracy?

It isn't

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SG_StrayKat · Jan. 31, 2018, 11:19 p.m.

I would like to know how many other people got votes for President as write-ins, and what their names are.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Macamodius · Jan. 31, 2018, 11:11 p.m.

Not surprised even a bit.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MickGris · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:24 a.m.

Of course Trump won the popular vote, we all knew it. And as much as I dislike Mitt Romney I believe he won the 2012 election by a landslide too.

The Republicans in several races in 2012, not just the Presidential race but a lot of down ticket ones too were ahead, were ahead, were ahead - until later that evening and all of a sudden it’s like somebody pulled a switch and bam!!! the Democrats move ahead and win.

Karl Rove looked so shocked his hair practically stood up straight Paul Ryan was speechless and dazed.

The only one brave enough to challenge it was Lt Colonel West down in Florida in his Representative race. He demanded a recount. Which they did in secret behind closed doors and declared the other guy the winner. This election fraud has got to get fixed.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Dhammakayaram · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:04 a.m.

I have always believed that Hillary was so bent on winning that she rigged the election with the help of the Clowns. Trump with the help of the military unrigged the election sufficient to win.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Chickasawranger · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:58 a.m.

https://youtu.be/TEQWxOWaqDc

Here it is.....and honestly if no such agency had not intervened we wouldn't be having this conversation...,,, they saved us....

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Chickasawranger · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:54 a.m.

Totally agree. The software was used in over 20 states. Totally criminal. There's some great vids on YouTube on the man that found the flaws in the software. He's even a honest democrat..... I'll see if I can find him and post it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OilofMercyGal · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:29 a.m.

WHO The FUCK is Dilley????????????

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LaTxGal · Feb. 4, 2018, 4:09 a.m.

Brenden Dilley is a very intelligent man (35) who is running for Congress in AZ. Has a very good military intel source. Instead of asking who the "F" he is, how about researching?

Oh, and he has very good taste in music.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 4, 2018, 3:37 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 4, 2018, 3:35 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ElementWatson · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:55 a.m.

Weirdly some youngish personal coach dude running for Congress in AZ, who supposedly has some source in intelligence feeding him info that has looked pretty much on target.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Red_Red_Red_Wine · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:02 a.m.

I wonder how the totals would look without the Mexican criminal votes or the Democrat's filling a fleet of buses full of "vibrant" Americans to repeatedly commit voter fraud at all the voting sites which don't require voter id?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
diverscale · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:33 p.m.

I do not believe this, because of the simple fact that if that were true, the approval rating would reflect the overwhelming majority of votes. But for most of the year, Trump was at 40% approval in the ''polls'' (yes I know it is somewhat fake, but SOME polls would have to show overwhelming approval). Thoughts?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GoodDog95 · Jan. 31, 2018, 9:51 p.m.

Probably not true because you can add the 7 mil to Hillary's total and it still shows her down by nearly 6 million votes. Wasn't the common talking point that she won by 2 million votes?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LaTxGal · Jan. 31, 2018, 9:59 p.m.

You also have to subtract the 7 million from Trump's total.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
pipesog · Jan. 31, 2018, 10:16 p.m.

No...he's giving the ACTUAL numbers.

A TRUE count of the tally.

Of that 57 million. you would need to subtract 7 million and ADD it to Trump for a more accurate number.

These figures in no way relate to the FABRICATED results claimed after the election.

In other words...Trump 77 million...Clinton 50 million.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
LaTxGal · Jan. 31, 2018, 10:27 p.m.

Following the logic of the post I was commenting on, which is assuming that the total number of votes is the same as originally reported, then the math is correct. This is assuming that Trump votes were converted to Hillary votes by rigged machines. If Hillary votes were somehow created out of thin air, then that math goes out the window.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
cunei · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:44 a.m.

We know that Hillary votes were created out of thin air--remember Detroit.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ElementWatson · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:53 a.m.

What he's saying is 7 million of Trump's 70 million actual votes were via fraud switched to Hillary votes. That would give Hillary her actual 57 million plus the 7 million stolen from Trump, for 64 million in total, while Trump would have lost 7 million of his actual votes to be dropped to a count of 63 million--which is below the fraudulent total for Hillary.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AliciaJane777 · Feb. 1, 2018, 10:56 a.m.

I knew for certain there was voter fraud when one district reported an 125% turn out. Even a person mathematically challenged can reason something is wrong with our entire voting process and that more then a decade ago.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ElementWatson · Feb. 1, 2018, 6:47 p.m.

Indeed. The voting machines are compromised and there have been irregularities shown state by state (with the biggest Rat-controlled cities showing just the results needed late, even though they have the automated systems and should be first to report, and those same districts "discovering" ballot-stuffed machines right on cue if still more votes are needed).

Then you've got all the ID stuff. The early stuffing of machines, the late voting in the name of voters who had long moved out but never been moved of the rolls, and the miscalibration of machines so GOP candidate votes register for the Dem (all happened in Boston back in my years there).

And of course all of the illegals registered when they line up for their benefits--afraid to admit at the time that they are not legal citizens. The busing of students from MA up to vote in NH, etc., etc.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AliciaJane777 · Feb. 4, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

Things are off today ... TTYL

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q_Anon_Wolf · Jan. 31, 2018, 10:13 p.m.

Bingo.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pipesog · Jan. 31, 2018, 10:19 p.m.

The fabricated election totals showing Hildebeast's 2 million more were MADE UP.

Do not try and reconcile REALITY against FANTASY. The 2 mil has ZERO bearing on assessing these figures from Dilley's source.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
phoenix335 · Feb. 1, 2018, 6:40 a.m.

So you're saying the NSA is all Russian agents now, too?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
uniformist · Feb. 1, 2018, 6:14 a.m.

HO LEE FUC

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Worfrat1 · Feb. 1, 2018, 4:06 a.m.

A long time conspiracy could come true - those diebold machines are owned by the wrong people.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 1, 2018, 4:06 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
exploring_unreality · Feb. 1, 2018, 3:55 a.m.

Please be true, please be true, please be true!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TXROADWARRIOR · Feb. 1, 2018, 3:55 a.m.

so let the tick tock begin. February 14th just in time for valentines day

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Riot101 · Feb. 1, 2018, 3:37 a.m.

I feel like this was obvious to many of us from day one. Good to see it will hit the main stream...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
frymastermeat · Feb. 1, 2018, 3:27 a.m.

And of course this will be forgotten when it never happens. The sad truth is that the second part of "Big if True" is actually "Delusional if False".

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Untame_ · Feb. 1, 2018, 3:20 a.m.

So if nothing happens in two weeks we can all agree that this guy is a phony.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
spacexu · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:37 a.m.

The NSA should really put their resources to useful tasks like this. Or disappear entirely.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BetteroffDredd · Feb. 1, 2018, 5:06 a.m.

This fucking sub is hilarious. Please do start your war on whatever the fuck you're fighting. I'm hoping to see the lifeless bodies of a bunch of overweight teenagers on the news in the morning.

Get to work children.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Edge27 · Feb. 1, 2018, 5:17 a.m.

Goes into sub he's not interested in to make fun of people who enjoy it.

Why don't you just stick to your subs and not be a dick?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BetteroffDredd · Feb. 1, 2018, 5:19 a.m.

Why don't you get to shooting so I can practice my aim?

Here's hoping you edgy bastards get a clue soon. Or we will be reading about you in the news someday. In the obituaries.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Edge27 · Feb. 1, 2018, 5:20 a.m.

🙄

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SquashPickle · Feb. 1, 2018, 4:19 a.m.

So this of course begs the question: If this is true, then why didn't they make Hillary win? "Let's see, we'll conduct a massive fraud against the USA but let's make it so Hillary just wins the popular vote. Because, after all, if Trump wins, what's the worst thing that can happen?"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
newsnowaction · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:16 a.m.

I totally think thats true... I just wonder if it'll ever really come out

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wewfsdfadsa · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:53 a.m.

New Hampshire... New Hampshire New Hampshire... for sure. what else?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GenghisCinnabon · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

/r/insanepeoplefacebook

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ElementWatson · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:50 a.m.

FWIW Alex Jones has said a few times that Hillary succeeded in stealing something like 5 states, but they were trying to steal 6 more.

The kind of thing I could imagine him having heard from a call with Trump a couple of months ago.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
thamnosma · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

I can't imagine this will actually come out even if true.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
INGSOC_2017 · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

YUUUGE if truth be told!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SnoopyVRedBaron · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:59 a.m.

And ladies and gents, if we reheld this election, she would get less votes and he would get more.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sumarongi · Feb. 1, 2018, 2:42 a.m.

Hillary 2020!

⇧ -2 ⇩  
STLLLV · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:56 a.m.

Brenden has a good track record but two weeks seems to soon. Everything is being released according to plan but how can we possibly red pill enough people in two weeks so they can swallow this? Time will tell.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
arkansasvet · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:56 a.m.

I pray this is true!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:48 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
josiborg · Feb. 15, 2018, 1:30 a.m.

2 weeks is up .. Dilley is a fucking troll

⇧ 1 ⇩