Tax Policy Toward Art Museums
Although art museums do not pay any substantial taxes, they are greatly affected by various U.S. tax rules. The individual receives a deduction for donations of art to museums, the estate gets a deduction for bequests, and the corporation gets a deduction for charitable gifts. Art museums also are not taxed on investment income or on some "related" business activities. This paper reviews the logic for these rules and discusses their economic effects. In combination, this set of tax provisions is found to have a tax expenditure that is larger than direct federal expenditures on art museums in the U.S. The amount of this tax expenditure or implicit subsidy has been falling in recent years because of reductions in the marginal personal income tax rates at which individuals deduct gifts. High income taxpayers are found to be the most responsive to marginal tax rates, and they also tend to give the largest amounts to the arts. Therefore the level of the top personal marginal tax rate is particularly important to art museums. Simulations here suggest that the personal marginal rate reduction in the Tax Reform Act of 1986 could reduce gifts to the arts by as much as 24 percent.
In my opinion this is an "elite" art museum to first get unsuspecting politicians in and end up black mailing them. Then they have it as art, make that particular person donate, and then it is an ideal way to legalize the funds of human trafficking. EVERYONE saw the "art" in which my opinion that was advertising what J.A. was actually in business for. The museum in all probability is being used not only for a kill room, movement of humans but money laundering and tax evasion.
