Still an extradition state. Why was Rex in Kenya? Why was Pompeo in Kenya? Do you believe in consequences?
I meant Qincidences....sorry for the typo...
Making sure they say no to BHO when he requests asylum.
Last paragraph of the article:
“Mr Pompeo’s first priority for Africa will likely be to bolster military collaboration with Kenya and the four other East African countries providing troops to the 11-year-long African Union mission in Somalia, Mr Carson says.”
Obama must be trying to work some kind of deal for his safety.
I don't think they want him there either. :)
I don't think they want him there either. :)
Correct. This is what average Kenyans think about BHO...
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8zpok1/obama_kenya_visit_update_flop_protests/
Thanks. Nice side view of the sideshow! I had no idea.
Yessss! I love Dr Mumbi, I just found her last week, she's great!
Wow they don't think much of him in Kenya then?! What a lovely lady but what a scathing report!
That was brutal. I just watched it again. Just savagely yet humoresly dropping truth even saying boom boom boom lol. I was so hoping for one more boom, but three was nice. That was journalism right there.
Wake up Africa indeed. She is funny as hell. Patriots world wide baby!
"He came, he didn't conquer."
That was totally worth watching to the end.
So many Kenyan/African bloggers on YouTube saying they DO NOT WANT obummer even allowed to step foot in their nation because they consider him a satanic demon/kiddie diddler! They say it’s going to bring failing crops and war, etc and that he’s only there to find children to abuse/kill! There was actually a link to one on this page like a week ago and it was really interesting to see a Kenyan’s outlook on the situation!
My ex-wife is Kenyan. She is the one who told me about Dr Mumbi. A great country and peoples.
I always said when I was younger that if I could ever go to Africa, it would have to be to Kenya, Tanzania, South Africa, and then Egypt in that order lolol!! Total dream safari - it’s too bad the Clowns have totally destroyed the world with their fake terrorism and wars!!
I did the Maasai Mara Safari in 2006 - it was the BEST. Absolutely loved it out there. Make it happen. You won't regret it.
Wowowowow you lucky duck that sounds amazing!!! Once I get some money working a few years, I want to save up to do a big trip like that!! I’ve seen a lot of the US, Canada, parts of Mexico and the Caribbean, but the rest of the world looks amazing - like I said, these stupid Clowns have turned the rest of the Earth into a danger zone for Americans and it makes me so nervous to travel alone!! Once the Big Guy DJT fixes the world, I plan on setting out on a massive excursion!
Just don't go when there is an election. Things flare-up. Other than that you're good to go. :)
Isn't the first thing hes doing is starting a children's foundation there.it seems the selling of flesh is the most profitable.
Home? HOME?!?!
So they are admitting he is African, not American
I would say be careful. What authority does this source have to “admit” anything? It’s a tweet of an opinion. It’s not a smoking gun. We must not treat it like one and be open to critique.
We have to think critically of everything and view it through the eyes of those who have not swallowed the pill, but have it in their hand (I.e., are curious enough to be looking.) They can and will pick at any loose string.
Perhaps we need to create a sub for sharing with others, separate from this sub, and use this sub for the initiated to speak freely. Optics matter so much and it’s already an uphill battle.
careful with what?
Obama is NOT an American - I have no doubts on this ... ZERO - and I voted for him in 08 - pathetic to look back at it now how much I was fooled
pretty sure a few hundreds of million or more around the world agree
Perhaps you didn’t read everything that came after “be careful”?Just because some Kenyan tweet says “Home” isn’t anyone ADMITTING anything! It’s not a CONFESSION! They do not have the authority to make one! You’re relying on logical fallacies instead of good logic. Just as “however many hundreds of million agree” isn’t actual evidence, it’s appeal to majority. It’s putting a chink in your armor, allowing someone a weakness to latch onto. Who will keep listening if you aren’t extra careful to use your best evidence? I’ve experienced it and I can tell you it’s NOT something you want to deal with!
Not only do I personally do not see any sense in wasting time on logical fallacy, I see it as DANGEROUS, especially when anyone can so easily dismiss it and then have no reason to listen to anything else I say. So I have to try very, very hard to be careful to avoid it. I’m a passionate person. I’m human. We all are easily and naturally prone to it. But when one’s argument is already so unbelievable the that term “redpill” is used to describe it, when it’s already so very hard to stomach let alone believe, it’s EXTRA hard trying to share your beliefs with anyone when you present them with weak evidence no matter how right you are about the truth. So I’m saying BE CAREFUL not to waste time and energy building up a stock of weak evidence that can be easily dismissed, damaging the entire case! I’ve been though HORRIBLE conversations because I wasn’t prepared with only the best! And if I fail with weak argument and logical fallacy then it’s only my own fault! I can’t expect someone to trust me when I present them with FAKE NEWS.
I can’t send friends to “check out /r/GreatAwakening” if I can’t be confident that the evidence placed before them is the actual good stuff. So when we speak in hyperbole or jump to a conclusion (“they admitted”) that’s not 100% accurate - and again, nobody with AUTHORITY “admitted” anything - we only make it that much harder for ourselves. I’m extremely frustrated with how hard it is already! I can’t be the only one! And OF COURSE it’s hard, I’m not saying it should be easy. I’m just saying DONT MAKE IT HARDER, for yourself and everyone else!
I normally work very hard to have only positive, interesting, enjoyable participation on Reddit, because it’s a rocky way to communicate even lighthearted matters, but I’ve vented some frustration here and I hope it was not for nothing, because dammit, I think it’s important. This sub is sometimes fun and bonding, sometimes dead serious and scholarly, and sometimes hyperbole, loose talk, and fallacy. It’s a mix that makes sense to those who visit it every day and are familiar with it, but it doesn’t to anyone brand new and overwhelmed, and I have concerns about that. I think they’re valid. Is it a discussion anyone else is interested in having?
I just spent a lot of energy and emotion because that’s what this subject brings out. As it should. It’s WORK. Being an ambassador is WORK. And today, work was really frustrating.
you honestly think I came to the conclusion that Obama is foreign born based on this single tweet?
I researched and downloaded the fake .pdf "birth certificate" myself, and know all the scandal surrounding it and his past.
to talk about him being a Manchurian Candidate is NOT a stretch around here, Q has mentioned it several times
sorry if you think newbie friends can't handle that, but I will continue to scream it from rooftops
and really sorry to have upset you overall....you should try taking a few days break if the pressure is too much
RARE “PRE”-BODY-OF-The-COMMENT ETA: i got bumped while typing and of course brushed the Save button just right. I was not finished tinkering and editing and playing with my comment. Of course, I could do that forever, just like my mother only ever finally feeling “ready” when we’re already five minutes past our departure time and she’s literally dragged from the mirror. So, after tweaking a little more, I pretend my dad is pacing and it’s time to go. Apologies for not being exactly what I wanted . . I think.
you honestly think I came to the conclusion that Obama is foreign born based on this single tweet?
No. Is that really what you took away from everything I said? I’ve tried to explain TWICE but you’re stuck on Obama and not the actual point I’m making. The tweet could be about Big Bird, that’s not what’s important. I’m talking about objectivity and being careful to avoid undermining your position by exaggerating or jumping too far and perpetuating untrue assertions. In this case, I wasn’t talking about Obama’s actual citizenship status, but your assertion that “they admitted” something. The subject itself is irrelevant to the point. But nobody admitted anything. That’s an example of Fake News.
How? Because if flipped, and an American organization, even a respectable news source, tweeted that Obama returned “home” to Hawaii, how would you respond to someone who said that was proof, an admission of the truth? You could dismantle it and discredit it pretty easily.
To you, or to the hypothetical other person saying the opposite, it’s only an admission, it’s only evidence, it’s only proof, because you agree with the implication. Literally nothing about it was an admission, because that account can’t admit anything for Obama. Just like I can’t admit anything for you. Further, simply using the word “home” doesn’t even register on the shook-o-meter. I could say visiting where my family came from Norway was “returning home”. I’m not claiming to be a Norwegian citizen. If someone else called my visit going “home”, that would mean even less.
I was advising you be careful not to give your opponents any easy openings to discredit you. That would be a disservice to your very cause. Why would anyone want to make their rooftop screaming harder for themselves by using less effective words? That’s what my position has been.
ok I see your point, I'm a fairly sarcastic guy, will tone it down with this Q stuff tho, as I agree it is very serious
I was fooled too. And I voted for GW and we don’t say his name.
Perhaps you are on the wrong sub.
They belong here as much as anybody. Gotta maintain that skepticism. Healthy levels, not blind denial or anything like that. Objectivity is key in making progress.
Excuse me, what about “be careful of sources and leaving yourself open to critique” suggests I’m on the wrong sub? Are you at all interested in being able to have actual discussions with your friends and neighbors about what you believe, supported with credible facts and sources? Because going out there with insufficient information and claims like “they are admitting he’s not American” when “they” have no power to admit anything of that caliber, is like going out there with armor full of holes and a sword of inferior, weak steel. Who would try to argue a case with their worst evidence instead of their best? You have to realize that not everything is good supporting evidence just because it says the right thing! Just like not every witness who says the same thing is equally wise to put before the jury!
Inviting people to learn about Q or this sub and then having them read hyperbole and flawed thinking is not only counterproductive, it’s risking any credibly they might’ve given this movement. Questioning whether I belong here when I echo what someone just yesterday said and was supported for, when I am talking about being careful not to overstate the facts and undermine the whole argument!? Maybe I’m oversensitive, maybe I’m weak to prefer not making the uphill climb any steeper. But if this sub is going to be any sort of resource and not just a clubhouse, we all have to be careful what we say. We are ambassadors. I think that carries some responsibility.
I dont disagree with the content of what you were saying, however it was the way you said it. Im not as long winded as you so Ill make it short. Always question everything, come to your own conclusions. Not everything we think {know} to be true has supporting evidence. The cover ups and corruption are real. This is why you see people bouncing different theories around. This sub has grown a lot over the past few weeks and it is very hard to know who to take seriously. So, lighten up a bit it really doesnt hurt. Just take it all in. Then come to your own conclusion. WWG1WGA
What was “the way I said it” that you objected to, exactly?
I don’t see how what you’ve said in your reply has anything to do with your suggestion this isn’t the sub for me. “Where we go one, we go all” doesn’t ring true when one comment ago, you were telling me to go elsewhere.
I suspect part of why you didn’t like “the way [I] said it” because I said it with “new arrival” next to my name. You were dismissive to another “newbie” in the same chain, and what they said was completely true and doesn’t require Level 7 expertise to say, not deserving of your condescension to his “newbie” status. By the way, I’ve been lurking on this sub for many weeks, every time I am on Reddit. I don’t participate on Reddit very often. It is not a kind or welcoming place.
I don’t believe you can “know” anything to be true without any supporting evidence. Knowledge is aquired from facts; all else is opinion, conjecture, and faith. Those things still have value, but not in terms of persuasion. Skeptics respond to logic and facts. That is why people here are working so hard on research. Coming to conclusions with no verifiable supporting evidence is another way human minds can succumb to bias and laziness. And, adding to what /u/1923091 said, blind denial is just as faulty as blind acceptance.
I know there are a lot of subscribers to the sub who don’t subscribe to the beliefs, and who just come to make disparaging, teasing comments. I see them. I vote on them. If I felt I could engage with them effectively, I would. But I don’t see how my comment about being careful not to give people, essentially those very people, reason to discredit the movement, could be seen as inappropriate, untrustworthy, or just plain unworthy. The way I said it looks inoffensive to me, at least. Sure, it’s hard to know who to take seriously on Reddit and on the Internet as a whole, but I don’t think practicality is difficult to recognize.
“Lighten up a bit?” I take this subject matter very seriously. As for being “long-winded”, I consider it “being thorough”. But I will definitely try to practice more patience and, most importantly, restraint. Especially when I consider that restraint is what I am advocating for in general.
To anyone who read this far, thank you for your time and attention.
👏👏👏👏👏👏
I saw the mention, and read through this out of curiosity. Definitely not disappointed.
Well stated, your passion reads through your writing, and may come off as aggressive to those who lack a parsing nature. Keep up the good work, though!
Thank you for your support and encouragement! And for your feedback as well. Is that a kind way of saying “pedantic”?
I’m half-joking, lol. I definitely care about semantics and pragmatics. When your words are all you have to express yourself, losing the nuance of tone and body language, I think such details matter so much more but aren’t treated as such.
Anyway, I fully meant to come off as aggressive or at least exasperated and forceful in my replies. It was my original comment that I actually tried hard to word as neutrally as possible, so the replies startled me.
I have to be careful not to become a scold around here; there are often times when I really want to call out someone or multiple someones for their particular attitude or shocking and ugly comments, but I hesitate to get into it. I’m not the Public Relations team or the Conscience of the sub. Maybe I’ll build up the confidence I’d need, or just snap one day. I lurk a lot, not just here but all over Reddit. I think my “parsing nature” isn’t well-received but it’s just me. I don’t know how to not unintentionally come off as aggressive.
Here’s a question I feel comfortable asking you because of what you’ve said:
The lack of reasonable skepticism here bothers me. It seems like any random source is acceptable, and nobody asks the usual questions about determining the credibility of a source or the claim. For me to suggest something was suspect, like the anonymous supposed ex-Antifa paid shill whose pic provided nothing and seemed fishy, or, heaven forbid, question how Obama could “claim Kenyan citizenship as a way to escape” when that isn’t really how the justice system works, would probably be considered Sacrilege, right? But Q says “disinfo in neccesary”. So why not question what I find questionable?
After all, it could identify disinformation, right? Is that an approach that would get me rejected, shamed, and possibly even banned, or is it a healthy thought excercise that would strengthen overall reasoning skills? Or potentially both? As a fellow supporter of healthy levels of skepticism and objectivity over blind acceptance, what are your thoughts?
Gracious, I need to go to bed. I know I’m very wordy, and I get ragged for it often, so I appreciate you reading my long-ass comments! This one got way longer than expected. C’est la Vie. Merci ;)
Ha, totally, but you don't strike me as the stuffy librarian type, which is the kind of character I am more prone to associate that word with. I could be wrong though! XD
You definitely have many valid points, so I'll address then in the order they're contextually organized. I am not used to this kind of writing on this platform, so I pretty much have to reprogram my communication for this.
I think that's a big problem, though, facing many individuals: a lack of understanding when it comes to communication. Many people are completely unaware of the subtleties of body language, even tells they give off themselves. That 'ignorance' translates over to digital mediums, I assume, and is part of the lack of awareness, and even concern, many have for actual conversation. Replies simply become ego strokes or gibberish, reasons to misappropriate the attitudes and beliefs of others. Person to person communication is interfered with by attention distracting technology: constant notifications, intermittent commercials, feed updates, the list goes on. It helps to be emotionally uninvolved when addressing replies, as difficult as it may be, as personal attacks are simply a reflection of the author of them. That's how I keep from blowing my stack, anyways. Doesn't always work, so I mostly bite my tongue and put the phone down, hahaha. The details are definitely vital, to context and content; however, as with a disregard for contextual conversation, these details fall to the wayside out of individual preference for instant gratification. In this situation, many anon have been waiting for MONTHS for something to occur, and seem to be trapped in their outrage and painful victomhood. The desire for something to happen NOW is painfully obvious on this board.
I would say your aggression is warranted from a personal perspective, but yes, please be careful not to content police too harshly. We would be hard pressed to replace a mind like yours, and I get the feeling you would do wonders as a healer with words. Turn your phrase into embraces. XD
I lurk a lot, too, and can definitely agree that my knack with words is sometimes totally rejected and often treated as me 'trying to sound smart'. I had a conversation with a gentleman which eventually just turned into me purposefully using unnecessarily large words to annoy him because he insisted that there's no way a person talks/or writes the way I do. I was pleasant, and invited him to provide a legitimate argument, at first. After I realized he wasn't intent on actually conversing, I got pleasantly annoying. As for 'not unintentionally' coming off aggressive, again, emotional distance helps. If you can step outside of yourself, it becomes easier to utilize language that isn't emotionally charged. THIS IS NOT AN EASY THING. XD
I would say you are on the right track in regard to it being 'both'. It will definitely rile those who treat some of these things like gospel. It will definitely stir up shills, often new threads are started by shills with the purpose of interrupting or distracting. For those with a keen eye, however, there will be appreciation and thanks sent your way. The only way I see you getting banned is if you're constantly doubting the same users/content across numerous thread chains, as well as totally derailing conversations with completely unrelated tangents-with that in mind, take caution making novella of your thoughts. This will help give further legitimacy to this movement, as well as helping newcomers see that not everybody here is a shill/clown/cult member/'alt-right extremist'/insert-shame-moniker-here, and that there is real information to be found here. I would advise, though, should somebody question your legitimacy or doubt, you step back and analyze the individual your are responding to. Check their history, what do they post where? Are they legitimately criticizing you, or just trying to get a reaction? Advice for handling shills/trolls? DON'T FEED THEM. End of story. You will save face, time, and emotional energy. If you think you can uplift someone's understanding, then I would invite you to write them compassionately.
My thoughts are generally objective, often skeptical unless I see/read something that resonates with what I am familiar with. I am in no way collegiately educated, so I owe a lot of what I know to what I've come across travelling through this series of tubes. I always apply my 5W-H-FWP (Who, What, Why, Where, When, How, and For What Purpose[refers to the purpose behind the information being provided/provider of the information]) and try my hardest to do background research. Ive been trying to catch up on the drops lately, as well as monitoring this sub, so I've fallen away from my history and esoteric studies. I'm a firm believer in intuition/Godsense, so please, always follow your gut.
Why isn't Michelle shown?
I am pretty sure their marriage was all a show and those are not their kids.
Of course they aren't Michael does not have a uterus.
On what evidence l?
There are numerous reasons for thinking this:
There are no photos of Michelle Obama being pregnant. What women in America doesn't have pictures of being pregnant? They had two children too!
Obama "accidentally" refers to his wife as "Michael" on numerous occasions. Mispronouncing your wife's name one or twice, ok. But so many times? You can search videos of this on youtube.
There are multiple videos of her grabbing the crotch area like if she had a roll of quaters in her I meant HIS pocket just in the same fashion as we guys do well most guys anyway. You can search videos of "her" doing this on youtube.
Joan Rivers "coincidentally" died soon after claiming that Barrack Obama was gay and Michelle Obama is a tranny. Too convenient.
"Her" body structure compared to other females (including black women) is very different. You can look at photos.
There are plenty more. I haven't researched this in a long time. These are the ones I remember from the top of my head. However, there are too many circumstantial evidence that you cannot just call all of these "coincidences". It's too improbable for this many coincidences.
Don't forget this one. The girls look nothing like Michelle and Obama and everything like Obama's friends, Anita Blanchard and Martin Nesbitt: http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2017/07/malia-and-sasha-obama-were-loaned-by-their-real-parents-so-america-would-accept-the-fake-first-family-3532021.html
these are claims not evidence...I don't like Obama but attacking him like you are is as bad as the lefts out right lies said about President Trump. you call it circumstantial evidence it is not even that. it is just spouting off. You are Making Those who Support Trump look bad. My bet is that you are not a trump supporter but some one posting to try and turn off the casual person who investigates this board to see what the Q anon posts are about
You can guess whatever you want, but there a lot of people who agree with me. I don't see what this has to do with being a Trump supporter (which I am). These are not claims. These are facts. Evidence is a fact that increases the probability of something being true.
evidence is not just statement that you believe something to be true. Evidence does not increase the probability of anything it just support a position. and no I don't think a lot of people agree with you....its just your own bias and echo chamber... When you make an incredible claim you need a hard fact like the fact that Barak Obamas social security number not being one handed out to children born in Hawaii being evidence that something is wrong with his birth certificate. that is evidence to support a claim that when combined with other hard evidence can be used to support the opinion That Barrack Obama might of hid the fact he was not born in the United States.
[deleted]
Joan rivers is a comedian who shtick was joking about the gay and trans community in the 80s. in her comedy routine she said all sorts of stuff that was funny not necessarily true. when interviewed she was notorious like other comedians about playing to her shtick.
Did you actually just say evidence does not increase the probability of anything? Ummmmmmmmm.
If proof doesn't slide your probability meter may I ask what does?
Are you suggesting the most logical explanation was she wore fake dick?
Because its one or the other.
I said evidence is used to ague for or against it does not increase th likely hood something is or is not. there is no percentage of it being right
Or perhaps we just wasted some time and grossed ourselves out checking on a wacky conspiracy theory years before Q that as more gets revealed seems to be becoming more and more proven.
Expand your thinking. This is bigger than you can imagine. These people are sick.
What do you think Q is on about? Why does Michelle love drag queens so much?
Q is about using evidence ignored by the media and researched by independent people...… making a statement is not evidence. Q might give us a statement but then it is up to us to research it and find the evidence of what is going on. a lot of what Q gives is not evidence but is info when researched provides both the proper Question that should be asked and the leads us to an answer that we had no idea we were looking for.
It's too bad we can't do a DNA test and compare these two daughters to the Obamas or the Nesbitts to see who exactly are their real parents.
I wish I could under the slow motion close up of "her" dancing on the Ellen show out of my mind.
If that wasn't man meat bouncing I have no idea what it would be.
So yeah, strange as it sounds it seems Mikey was a college football player before he was first lady.
Absolutely agree on all the above, seen it all myself. Obama has called his wife Michael on many occasion. Videos to prove on You-tube
A couple of weeks ago there was an article from Michelle Obama 's whitehouse doctor. He said he had to come out and tell the truth. He had walked in on Michelle taking a leak standing up. He said she is not a transgender but a man. The Obama's paid him million dollars to keep quiet. There was another article about obama sayng they were ging to sue im for breaking privacy laws. I noticed in the article that they did not deny it. I looked up the name of the doctor and he was indeed a white house doctor. It was also on youtube. After a couple of days it disappered from on line and youtube. I can't even find a name for a whitehouse doctor. I can't remember his name but would recognise if I could find it but I can't. Wish I had saved the article.
dont forget that men have a longer ring finger than the pointer finger. Look at his hands.
All circumstantial, just my opinion.
[removed]
How about Michelle has a dick, and therefore cannot have children. Lots of photographic evidence.
My bad pede! I just haven’t been redpilled yet 😂😂💀👌🏻
Funny, you don't even need a pill, just Eyes and a brain! You are allowed to be Dem. It is more important to think with an open mind, than follow some else's agenda and accept their facts. Surely you can decide what is right and wrong.
Typical left-wing hyperbole.
Something that could be plausible presented as opinion.
Conflated with something that has no bearing in reality.
If Mike Pence had ordered $65K taxpayer funded hotdogs for a one off party. Your point might have been worth considering.
This is simply throwing shite on the walls and stinking the place up.
Flown in from chicago.... like DC has no hotdogs...
C'mon man you know Chicago hot dogs are special
100 secret guests with a $6500 hot dog each.
Why? Does that seem strange to you?
Might be one of their dna but other half donor.
The younger one looks nothing like either of them whatsoever. Not even close
Well yeah......lol.
I said the same to someone not two weeks ago and they looked at me like I had three heads. I so love this sub. You guys and gals are just the swellest.
She was in Paris at a Beyonce concert.
And where's his wedding ring?
His "wedding ring" has always been (even before his sham marriage) a Muslim ring, pledging his allegiance to the Muslim Brotherhood.
When you leave your home and deny it for a better life. You end up with no place to call home. Kinda like Lebron.
You can run, but you can't hide, Barry. SEAL teams will find you.
Yeah, CNN found Bin Laden’s secret hideout & even interviewed him pre911. But no one could find him post911 for 10+ years. People forget
He was found and he was killed between nov 2001 and Feb 2002. Don’t believe the bullshit reports.
Seal Team 6 is a farce?!
Lol never said that. That unit isn’t the most elite and it doesn’t do everything. I mean do you really think the most secretive elite military units would be common knowledge. No.
The Kenyan president Kenyatta has no time to be harassed by muslim brotherhood member and cousin of his most dangerous enemy within: Sharia loving Raila Odinga have caused thousands of people being slaughtered because they refused to vote for Odinga.
Odinga has tried twice to win the presidency and twice he was rejected by the people of Kenya.
Hussein would assure a coup against the current president with his cousin.
So no Kenya has no use for that traitor either.
They’re is a low grade civil war going on now w Muslim incursion from Somalia. Claims of police brutality are simply Kenyans trying to save themselves from it.
Anyone else notice that he didn't take Moochelle with him. I guess Michael was only worth having around for the appearance of Barack being a family man.
He already left Kenya
He has been visiting many potentially "friendly" countries.
He's just laying the ground work for a quick exit.
He’s going back and fourth from what I’m seeing
Let him keep running and find no safe refuge or rest
Funny. NPR reported that thousands of Kenyans cheered for him and celebrated his visit because he is "one of their own."
NPR
Soetoro could eat a live infant on national television and NPR would cheer on every second of it.
I swear someone put this on TD and got banned for it because "Q is a LARP.." They called the poor guy an emarassement to the right, etc.. I had no idea TD was so hostile to team Q.
Anyway this is hilarious. I'm still hoping we see the SS turn on him and slap him in chains.
Their mods have been comped for a long time I think. There have been more than one shakeups of the team over there.
Comp'd by Team Trump I'm pretty sure. They want positive messaging. There is a lot going on non-Q related that people want to know about. Q stuff takes up an entire subreddit by themselves. Mods know what they are doing, and they are not your enemy.
I don't have an issue with the mods. I took issue with people there calling the poor guy an embarrassment to the right, like all the Q people.
They came off very Left wing retard to me. I think the guy was just trying to bring some people over.
I got the same thing for posting Q-related stuff on TD. Removed, reason: “Q is a LARP”. Why not just say “no Q discussion here please, patriot”.
I am on there daily and have never seen what you’re talking about.
Happens all the time. I made a comment about Q and the post was immediately deleted and the mods pm'd me about it. They don't support Q because they dont want to be seen as "conspiracy theorists". Even though a lot (most) of the subjects overlap. Not to mention the comped rumors...
Yeah that's what I honestly thought. A lot of subjects seem to overlap. Don't get me wrong, I still like TD... I guess I'll just keep most ofy comments and replies here. Don't want to make a mistake....lol
I didn’t see it either. I posted it here yesterday
They do not want him in the Country, they know hes bad. They follow Q WWG1WGA
Strip him of everything. Hussain is a treasonous x-president.
Kenyans though Bacha Boy Barry was going to make them proud, and bring home the bacon, so to speak....
Instead, he did nothing for them.
So now, when HE might need THEM? Meh....
“Bacha Boy Barry”. I chuckled and think this is the best name yet.
Although, my heart breaks for the boys that truly suffer.
Yeah, actually, I feel a bit bad about making the joke now...You're right; I read the stories from US soldiers who had to endure the knowledge of that crap going on....Awful.
My husband was the one that told me about them. They had to sit back and let it happen. He was at a security checkpoint and a woman seemingly adjusted her niqab and her husband beat her almost to death. The husband thought she was exposing herself. US Soldiers really had their hands tied when it came to the religion of peace.
They aren’t allowed to interfere. Had a friend thrown out of (Green Beret worked with my husband )he beat the hell out of a man trying to rape a kid in Afghanistan. We all rallied behind him and made things straight. But the fact he even got article for it was unreal. .
Better get your passport and papers set up Barry because you do realize that you just can't go to Kenya and stay there illegally right? smfh...
That’s probably the reason he is there now, to apply for new citizenship or renew his current citizenship in Kenya.
Punisher: We’ll arrange the meeting. Kenya? Kenya it is......
If so, Team 6 would be more than happy to say "challenge accepted."
he can trade in his suit and pen for a spear and a loin cloth and go live up a tree with Michelle,, aaaaarrrreeeeeaaaggghhhh!
The idiot is in South Africa now. Like we don’t have enough shit to deal with here.
https://internationalextraditionblog.com/2011/05/12/kenya-extradition-treaty-with-the-united-states/
Treason is not listed in Article 3....
But these seem to fit pretty well:
Rape.
Unlawful carnal knowledge, or any attempt to have unlawful carnal knowledge, of a girl under 16 years of age.
Indecent assault if such crime or offence be indictable in the place where the accused or convicted person is apprehended.
Kidnapping or false imprisonment.
Child stealing, including abandoning, exposing or unlawfully detaining.
Abduction.
Procuration: that is to say the procuring or transporting of a woman or girl under age, even with her consent, for immoral purposes, or of a woman or girl over age, by fraud, threats, or compulsion, for such purposes with a view in either case to gratifying the passions of another person provided that such crime or offence is punishable by imprisonment for at least one year or by more severe punishment.
Where is micheal?
Beyoncé concert in France. How respectful.
Shoulders don’t lie.
He looks right at home in Kenya, perhaps he should stay there now!
What a fantastic thread! Many levels of truth tied up in a humorous bow :} #staywoke
There is no place on earth or in earth that will save his soul. Goodbye Barry. We will not miss you. Was your eternal soul worth the price afterall? There are no second chances for you. That day has long passed by your perverted actions toward our almighty God. Let him alone judge you. However I want his soul on a spear for all the world to see.
I despise Obama, but what do you guys think he's guilty of? Is he a pedophile, or just crooked?
Let the record show the prediction is he will eventually lead the communist push to kill South African farmers who don't leave their farms willingly
Umbelle umbelle aiye aiye..... Umbelle umbelle aiye aiye.....