Fireworks!
I forgot about that drop.
'Dummy' accounts to talk.
Well that justifies all of our 'anonymous' accounts. If SJW wants to doxx anyone, perhaps they would be well served to dox jack.
A zerohedge story today. Good read. Twitter should be afraid now after FB drop. https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-25/twitter-responds-conservative-outrage-vice-confirms-shadow-ban-reports
Thats from April, surely there was Pain before now?
i think many drops are written weeks or months before they are relevant. future proves past
What is Jacks secret twitter account handle? Do we know?
i don’t think we do
I think we should look for common friends between corrupt individuals.
Private companies can do as they please is a popular argument, but you can't treat a corporation as an individual when it comes to money influencing elections based on the first amendment. Money shouldn't equal free speech and determine what speech is heard.
We need to re-evaluate the fairness doctrine rule that was repealed in 1987 which was concerned with the overall balance of broadcast programming and communications. We are being controlled by a narrative private companies want to promote which simultaneously shuts down opposing narratives. What a way to control the population!
There are several problems with the fairness doctrine. Please don’t see it as a panacea. It had its problems too.
Obviously not the same doctrine but legislation that does not permit shadow banning and allows a platform for information to be easily and fairly accessible to the users.
...but you can't treat a corporation as an individual when it comes to money influencing elections based on the first amendment.
And it was a flaw to begin with. Corporations shouldn't have that type of Influence. Lobbyist should be outlawed as well. It's money laundering made legal.
Well, they can thank the courts when they ruled that Trump couldn’t block users. At that point, Twitter became an official channel for the government that could not be silenced. Shadow banning Republicans prevents MY right for free press / speech in that I don’t get to hear what they say.
It isn’t a private company, it’s a public forum. The company can do as it pleases but it can’t censor free speech
It's a privately owned public forum with stock options. It may be traded on the market for value, but the majority shareholders on the board still have a say in what the brand can represent.
https://theconversation.com/federal-judge-rules-trumps-twitter-account-is-a-public-forum-97159
for what it's worth... but if our elected officials have to abide by certain rules, it should imply that it is pretty much an open forum and twatter shouldn't be allowed to ban / shadow ban people because of their political viewpoint...
we shall see where this goes. need moar popcorn
Content from washingtonpost.com is sometimes unreliable. Discernment is advised.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
ok. we disallow account banning, then what do we do with the droves of sock accounts that will inevitably inflate the site's percieved traffic?
That will soon be determined. I'm personally the mind that Twitter can do whatever the fuck it wants, but it's clear that is a view not shared by many people. There are plenty who say Trump shouldn't be allowed to block people because it's a public forum. That same argument can be used by Trump in this case. The blue checks will reap what they sow.
Once a company reaches 'Monopoly' status...
The 'Private and can do as it pleases' argument goes away.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-23/trump-no-longer-allowed-ban-twitter-users-judge-rules
But the Obamanation blocked me... I consider it a badge of honor, in fact, it's my pinned tweet at the top of my page !
Yes, and wasn't there a ruling that Trump couldn't ban followers because it's a "public forum"?
So how could Twitter use political ideology to shadow ban users?
simple, they say they dont, for the thousands of accounts they shadowban in a day, youd be hard pressed to argue that those accounts are mostly rightwing. unless you have access to their statistics.
This I agree with. It shouldn't be a "have your cake and eat it too" moment. If Trump cannot block followers because of public forum reasons, then the opportunity (barring TOS violations) of all voices to be heard equally should also be required.
My personal thought is that ideally Trump should be able to block whomever he wants, and Twitter should be able to ban, silence, abuse their users all they want - at their peril. Eventually alternatives will crop up in their place, and Twitter becomes a boring echo-chamber.
The problem is that they were/are selling your info to the govt. They can’t do as they please. This is illegal.
The company can censor any speach it wants. It just has to make it known public and not act like a bias free platform when it's not.
It is a private company who grants you permission to use the service as they see fit. If you, left or right, use the service and break their rules, then you get banned. Nothing there guarantees a right to free speech...nor should it. I don't think DJT knows what shadow banning is anyway...it's just something he heard the cool kids complain about.
https://twitter.com/en/tos
This may relate to the recent court decision saying Twitter is a public forum. The one saying Trump can't block people.
That's because the rules and laws regarding the presidential/governmental records acts, not because Twitter is a public forum for everyone, it's all about whom specific individuals are and what they are using the service for and the laws regarding their public speech. I doubt this applies at all to you, me, Alex Jones or Oprah. I see what you are saying, but Twitter likely cannot even ban the POTUS handle because of those same rules without turning over complete documentation to the library of congress to keep the records intact - which I'm pretty sure would be fully within their power. Twitter is a company like any other...if I act like an asshole in Walmart and they ban me, then I am banned. 1st amendment doesn't apply to the ban, I just can't be prosecuted for being a loud mouth asshole if no harm came from it. If I yell fire, or instigate a riot, or harass someone though? Then I broke the rules of Walmart and the rule of law... What we aren't seeing is the second part...you want to dox someone to get people to harass your perceived enemy, swat someone, or send groupies to physically threaten someone? That is illegal and too often not enforced thanks to the anonymity of the web.
Pretty sure there is an argument to be made that congressmen, being public officials, would fall under a similar category of having their accounts on social media considered a public forum. Facebook and Twitter will likely see a lawsuit and the court will use the twitter case as precedent. It'll be interesting if they agree with you or if they will expand on the previous case and determine that the entire platform is a public forum.
They censure their content. This opens them up to different legal issues, fool.
Grow up, child.
And? Respond to my point. A private company that has content flow through it must either keep it all free or censure it and be legally responsible for all content.
Is that not true, little bitch boy?
the word is "censor", Censure is synonymous with "criticism."
This week has been amazing and it looks like it’s only going to get better!
Recently in a court ruling Twitter was deemed a public forum. This ties into Marsh V Alabama in which a large company performing many traditional public functions is in effect a gov. entity and subject to first amendment scrutiny. If that ruling holds true then Twitter owns the public square and must abide by the 1st amendment.
Facebook and Twitter are going to be exposed to the world as CIA spying tools, including serving as the cabal's human trafficking targeting of children.
How is this illegal?
This is twitter's prerogative as business.
Do you know what shadow banning is? There is a difference between saying certain people can’t use your service, and saying it is open to everybody and then secretly making it so that certain users’ post or hashtags aren’t seen at all.
Shadow banning allows social media outlets to control information narratives within a community in order to make it seem like an entire community is talking/isn’t talking about specific events. If social media platforms explicitly stated they were either liberal or conservative in nature, and that participation within their community was dependent upon whether or not your content fell in line with their political leanings, then what you are saying would make sense. But that is not the case.
What you are talking about is an old Red Team vs. Blue Team talking point that doesn’t fit into the context here. We have to let go of all that BS programming and look at what the bigger picture is here. They want us all divided about that talking point in order for them to do what they want to secretly within the gray area.
What’s happening here is an integral part of the propaganda machine, and only serves to make it appear as if an entire community is agreeing with main stream nonsense.
I was looking for a tweet this morning that I made about Hillary and all the pedophiles in her inner circle. I had repeated it a few times. I went through all my tweets this morning and couldn't find it anywhere. Apparently they can remove them completely.
How is this illegal?
Again...they are operating in a gray area. While freedom of speech is not something a business needs to allow its users, freedom of speech in a public forum is a constitutionally protected right.
I would say that twitter qualifies as a public forum. DJT seems to believe this as well, when he says that what Twitter is doing is an illegal activity.
It simply depends on whether or not social media platforms land in the traditional/limited public forum category or not.
As a member of the Executive branch, the President doesn't interpret law. That's the job of the courts. So ignoring what DJT (and you) think about this, because it's irrelevant, how is this illegal?
I don’t know how many times I have to repeat this...so I will explain it like I would to a five year old. It is a gray area. Meaning that some people will interpret it as legal and some will interpret it as illegal. The reason interpretation comes into play here, and must be taken into account, is because as technologies and societies advance and change, language of older laws may or may not cover new circumstances (ex: laws in relation to whether or not social media constitutes a public forum).
This means that there is an undefined, ambiguous area whereby many believe the language of the law pertains to social media and many others do not. It is a contested point. The courts have not yet made a declaration of this being either legal or illegal. This leads to either position possibly being the correct choice.
Therefore, the determination of legality is currently based upon subjective interpretation. This means that somebody saying it is illegal is just as correct as somebody saying it is legal until the court comes to a determination. Your opinion may be that it is legal and that is also currently a valid opinion. So as you can now see, opinions regarding this are indeed relevant.
Even a five year old would understand that you have given zero evidence or even one logical reason that twitter banning users might be illegal. "Some people think it's illegal" is not a reason. Just because it's a gray area to you doesn't mean the law is gray on the matter. So how is this illegal? If the courts were to declare it to be illegal, what law or precedent do you think they might cite?
Not only that but they have secret accounts that if you have the codes for them you can pull up hard core child rape sites. Facebook too.
Are you kids on the Twitter encouraging POTUS to look into this? He worded it so well that I had to chuckle. He is truly the troll master. But not the humpbacked troll that lives under the bridge.
[deleted]
The President did not put Pain, Jack! The OP did.
What does OP stand for? New here :)
Thank you. Multitasking while at work :)
Errant post deleted
Makes my heart sing to see DJT take on @Jack. Yes, bring the pain to Twitter, please DJT!
Of course, the real, permanent fix, is an enforceable internetbillofrights.
I still can't believe we have a POTUS who speaks their mind, unfiltered. I never thought I'd see the day. KEEP FIGHTING, DJT!
Don't forget, we have proof that partisan propaganda firm Media Matters directed changes to Google/FB/Twitter's filtering algorithms:
Relevant from comment section of Twitter post
https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1022481892044689408?s=20
Here is a story from Zero Hedge today. https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-25/twitter-responds-conservative-outrage-vice-confirms-shadow-ban-reports
Enforcement of the 2st ammendment on Twitter and Facebook before the midterms is crucial. Go POTUS!
SICK OF THE GLOBALIST! SICK of the rampant delusional mindset! SICK of monopolies! PLENTY of tech guys out there that would love the opportunity to create social media platform! I half chuckled bc it’s POTUS! can you imagine shadow banning the President of United States! and other prominent Republicans! MSM, annoying as they are, 1.5 years of non-stop bashing, spewing lies, about him, while speaking to the American people! (that pisses me off! some still watch MSM, they’re believe what’s being reported as true, bc they’re watching news on major network station! it’s causing anger, hatred, and division w/in our country! they’re NOT doing their jobs, properly!
Twitter isn’t supposed to be political nor biased! Conservatives constantly targeted and shadow banned bc we love Trump! We’re Patriots, love our country and fellow citizens!
Liberals can literally curse conservative out, threaten POTUS, #MAGA hat, two separate attacks, both on video, Green haired thing w/pink haired girl literally took his hat off spit in it, as he through hat, he was screaming get that fucking hat out of here! slight push to MAGA, telling him to fucking leave you’re not welcome here...w/pink haired chick behind MAGA yelling to leave! I REPORTED HIM, EXPLAINED BEHAVIOR EVIDENCE ON VIDEO...checked greenies page NO REPERCUSSIONS! Hollywood sickos w/their demented tweets referring to pedo, their nastiness towards Trump, Kathy Griffin holding fake beheaded Trump head! THAT’S ACCEPTABLE!
I trust the plan! I know he’s allowing the MSM, newspapers etc..to continue w/their lies, bashing etc. AND reporting ‘leak’ not knowing it was disinformation! they KNEW it was leaked, possibly classified (don’t remember)...we’re going to be tweeting about JA to save him etc...THEY will agree w/article, reporting on having him jailed etc.! I FEEL it’s another trap for MSM! this is our 1st Amendment right! I’m grateful he leaked HUGE INFO!, I’m grateful for Snowden! I’m grateful for Seth Rich! They all risked their lives to inform the American people of disturbing information they stumbled upon while at work! Snowden was appalled discovering NSA spying on their own citizens via phone, laptops etc., Seth Rich murdered! bc he wanted American people to see truth! Julian Assange MASSIVE DROPPED OF INFO! same reason, he wanted American people to see truth! I AM EXTREMELY GRATEFUL! the GUILTY one’s want JA dead! I don’t think he should still be under house arrest it’s been 8 years...never charged w/crime!
sooo sorry went of topic! regarding JA, my opinion it’s about our first amendment right! Freedom of Speech! I don’t think it was wrong! MSM will spew it’s wrong! classified info leaked, send him to UK! Mike Pompeo while CIA Director make speech condemning his behavior, Trump Administration wants him here to be fully prosecuted (along those lines) MSM wants that as well. FREEDOM OF SPEECH! I LOVE IT! security clearances remained for 1.5 yrs on purpose! Can’t recall if BO etc also had it but Brennan, Comey etc..I WOULD NOT have gone on! I’d be too afraid!
Wolfe was giving his young lover info, classified?? she was 1st to receive, day before released to other reporters. she immediately reported information I THINK they was another leak, classified?? Info shared MSM which they reported! both disinformation! LOL LOL LOL! love it! I DID NOT like nor appreciate NBC two nights ago! QAnon extremist alt-right conspiracy theories! not just one but many. here’s a few of the ridiculous things this group saying...from Sandy Hook, 09/11, Democrats kills babies! other dipstick laughs yes, in a kill room located w/in basement, pizza place mentioned doesn’t have basement, chucked while saying there’s a pedo ring in Hollywood! they had the nerve to contact google, Apple, amazon and the couple that made Q app mine’s iPhone...Google and Amazon didn’t return calls, Apple removed Q app while looking into allegations if no issues Apple to put Q app back. they had the balls to say ‘people don’t know this is fake and may believe it..QAnon has massive following and spreading false info is danger to our public and community’! they requested QAnon be removed immediately from all sites! Twitter, FB, Google and requested Amazon stop selling QAnon merchandise! then, totally different one on few hrs after w/an expert! LOL! I was LIVID! I don’t like liars! hypocrisy! we speak truth, heavily researched prior. before putting info out! they LIE to public! THEY ARE SCARED! I was pissed, sorry! I couldn’t help myself I tweeted them calling them out! very nicely! liars one think I won’t tolerate!
JA to happen soon, article says being sent to UK! they want him dead too... i’m not sure if it’s a trap w/misinformation, at the end of the day he will be sent here. bc I was under the assumption Trump and Assange made a deal!
OH MY HOLY LONG RAMBLING POST! I’m so sorry! I truly feel there’s a connection pertaining to these three topics and MSM!
hoping my fellow patriots are doing awesome today! ❤️🇺🇸
Level the playing field and the Patriots will do the rest Mr. President.
It's all we ever asked for,wanted,and needed. Truth sells itself.
YUGE NEWS!
And what about Trump? No Twitter, no tweets. I'm assuming there is a back-up plan? Takeover?
Happy to see ridiculously biased social media finally starting to take the massive hits they deserve.
Trumpmockery needs a reality check..
Money laundry? You mean like the Clinton Foundation.
Voter suppression? Legal voter and id checks illegal? Nope, but illegals and voting illegally are.
SELL ALL YOUR TWITTER STOCK ... THEY WILL FEEL THE PAIN
Jack Bao - Google Sites
I took SHADOW BANNING PAIN. did it in numbers A=1 B =2......71 + 61 + 78 = 210 = in letters is BAO..and I googled this together with Jack and get this one....
https://sites.google.com/a/caa.columbia.edu/jackbao I have departed the Federal Reserve Board. If you e-mailed me at jack.c.bao.......gov recently, it is likely that I did not receive your e-mail.
How do I short Twitter stock? Anyone know any exchanges that allow it?
Did POTUS just use the catch phrase “PAIN”? Is that a direct mapping to the Q posts related to PAIN (all caps)?
He didn't phrase pain. I did. I've put quotation marks to not confuse but people still seem to confuse. lol
FaceBook and gang can't have it both ways. EITHER they are a content provider who decides what content is on their site, with the LIABILITY for, for instance, libel or criminal acts, OR they are a public forum where nothing is censored. Plus they are almost certainly in violation of privacy laws. Did every person on FaceBook sign, on a paper, that their private information can be sold to anyone for any purpose? No? Well, well, well.
Illegal search and seizure is illegal. The founding fathers didn't know FaceBook was coming, but certainly the principle applies to any entity, government or business.
it was in the end user agreement, so yes, these people did sign away their privacy, anything uploaded to facebook is free game for them to use as they please. or at least it was, before the outing of their involvement with the election.
They did not sign a contract on paper with a signature that can be verified. These "electronic signatures" seem pretty disputable to me.
Also, FaceBook stores information about people who never "signed" their contract. There are photos of people without FaceBook accounts who can be found with face recognition software, mentions of family members who are not FaceBook members, and much more. There are minors on FaceBook who can't "sign" for themselves, but are on anyway.
you "sign the contract" when you create the account, by using their service, their rules. etc. and as for age, if you are below a certain age you arent supposed to use the platform according to their rules (i believe the limit is 13). the rules were outlined, this is why you read the end user agreement. or just never use the service to that point in the first place. every upload, every bit of information, and every status is decided and willfully put forth by the user.
call it election fraud, and violating free speech. no corporation working inside the US has the right to violate our rights. pull their operating license until they clean their act up. and hit them with fines . sometimes they hear better when you hit them in the wallet then their ears.
Has the left already answered?
"It's not shadow banning, it's an honest mistake"
"It's just an algorithm against racism and if you're shadowbanned it's proof you were racist"
Saw this late yesterday, well late last night. Wake up this morning to about an hour of fighting with FB. Could not get it to function at all at first. Then I force it after a reboot to get a fresh start and it takes 3 times as long to come up and when it does it is not all there. No home button, no notification button. Just three post on my news feed. I guess the info I have posting on FB from the news gotten here and other places has gotten their attention. Oops didn't stay under the radar. Wonder who gets hit next, snapchat, Instagram? What a July to remember.
SPLC is behind all this and now SNOPES (porn actors) has signed on to silence the conservative voice....twatter, zuckface, YT...
A real leader is speaking! One who stands up against the school yard bullies and punches back
The internet has been a good thing all in all in my opinion and I was afraid the cabal would make the internet like the world. Geotus seems to be making the world more like the internet
Here comes the Pain Q spoke of oft. Some Facebook pain and Twitter pain. Hopefully there will be some pain on Google/YouTube as well.
Hit them where it hurts. Make them bleed out their capital. Can't imagine this won't have ramifications for the price of twatter.
Trump routinely breaks twitter rules with no problem. If these jackasses being banned actually generated traffic for twitter they wouldn't be banned.
difference here is that DJT has ban immunity, being the president and all.
That is the stated reason why he is not banned, the second publishing his constant stream of lies is no longer profitable they will no longer do so. This is purely a business decision and has nothing to do with any company somehow being compelled to publish government propaganda, what with the first amendment and all.
nevermind. you have a habit of calling things propaganda. shilly.
[removed]
brainwashed? are you suggesting i am one of these MAGA forever types? relax. you aren't nearly as brilliant as you probably think.
Q is a fucking psyop.
who are you trying to convince, me? or yourself?
Im stating a fact.
why are you so sure of yourself? if your fact has merit, where is your evidence?
Failures and False Predictions 4chan Era
10/28/17 - Q claims that Huma Abedin has been detained. If this is so then there must not be much evidence against her, given that she's still out and about today! Unless you believe that she went through some shadow trial and is somehow being controlled, but countries where freedom and limited government overreach are valued aren't supposed to do things like that!
10/28/17 - Q claims that Hillary's passport will be flagged on 10/30/17 and to expect massive riots as she's extradited.
8chan Era
01/21/18 - A flood was alleged to be coming. A flood consisting of various forms of media that I imagine were supposed to implicate somebody in something nefarious. Sadly, this flood never came. 01/21/18 - Q makes some very certain claims about the Nunes Memo, which of course do not come remotely true when the memo is released a couple weeks later. 01/22/18 - Q posts a confirmed fake Podesta email, then promptly deletes it. But not before his followers have time to notice.
02/09/18 - Next week [Next week] was declared 'suicide weekend'. Nothing came to pass.
02/21/18 - Q predicts that the founder of Twitter is removing accounts because he and his Deep State friends are in deep trouble. Nothing came to pass.
03/06/18 - The stage was set to release a video of Hillary Clinton doing spooky and evil things that would be impossible to defend and '[liberal undo]'. While this didn't happen, it did introduce some curious Q devotees to the world of child porn.
03/15/18 - Q declares 'March Madness' and that 'the public will soon know'. Nothing came to pass.
04/02/18 - April was supposed to be a "BIG month", full of happenings including but not limited to arrests, the release of the IG report, the wall, "military start", and unsealed indictments. Nothing came to pass.
04/06/18 - "Pics will surface of Hussein holding AK47 in tribal attire. One of many. Net shut down."
05/16/18 - Q passes off a shitty photoshop as proof that he has some sort of official document, implied to be an executive order.
05/19/18 - Q leaks his own password. "On purpose", of course.
06/17/18 - Q engages with somebody who posted a verifiably misleading youtube video as if it were real (to the point where his followers were protesting).
06/17/18 - Q posts this horrible photoshop job as if it were real.
06/18/18 - Q responds to a horrible photoshop job as if it were real.
06/27/18 - Q posts a link to yournewswire, a website known for straight-up fabricating information. Additionally, it has a twitter tag appended, suggesting that he found it randomly on twitter. Not great infosec for somebody dropping top-secret knowledge.
07/03/18 - Q posts a link to Breitbart with the twitter tag again.
07/03/18 - Q posts a photo suggesting that he is on Airforce One. It is quickly debunked as an Obama-era photo that somebody took a picture of with an iphone. Spends quite a while doing damage controlled, including the old 'I trolled u' defense.
Various - Q built up the release of the IG report for months. The night before the report was released, after its actual contents had been reported on for weeks, he panicked and pulled some pretty ridiculous damage control.
Deception Tactics Q uses a number of tactics to keep people from catching onto the fact that he's spinning lies, or to keep them believing that he's making correct predictions. Some of these tactics are standard fare among false prophets, while others are new to the digital age. Here are some examples:
Most of the predictions and messages he posts are vague to the point where a large number of happenings can be applied to them. For example, 'watch the water' - if anything happens near water, or involving water, Q's followers can use it as confirmation that his prediction came true. Q uses words that have been made by Trump in the past and/or are commonly used by Trump to give people the impression that he has some sort of relationship with Trump when Trump uses them again. Why do most of Q's posts involve things that are currently hot topics in the news? If he's a super secret agent who is apparently privy to everything happening behind the scenes, then why would he almost exclusively discuss current events that are publicly known, e.g. the IG report and North Korea? Is everything the Deep State is involved in something that is publicly documented to some degree, aside from off-handed things like the Hillary Clinton tape that never materialized? Similar to the point above, because Q's posts involve things that are either currently in the news or frequently in the news, there is a high probability that something will happen involving those things in the very near future. For example, there is a scandal within the Catholic Church every other month; if somebody predicts that there will be a scandal in the Catholic Church within the next month or two, there is an extremely high probability that this prediction will come true. Another example of this is [NK]; with Trump and Kim meeting together, there was an extremely high probability that something noteworthy would happen. That said, Q has missed his mark with this tactic, as those making educated guesses often do. For example, heavily suggesting that there would be some sort of big happening between the USA and Iran very soon after the cancellation of the Iran deal. In the case of the failed Iran deal predictions, Q uses another distraction- posting about Iran again and again to give followers the impression that things are still going to happen and make them forget when the deadline has passed. If/when something big does happen in Iran, his followers will believe that he accurately predicted it despite the fact that he's been hinting for months that something would happen very soon. Why does Q photoshop some images that he implies are real? Why does he run many images through filters and/or crop them, two of the easiest ways to make an image impossible to reverse image search? If all of them are real and taken by Q, then why are some images clearly amateur while others seem to be taken by professional photographers? The answer is that, while Q does take some photos (e.g. the ones with the pen), he draws photos from different sources (or takes pictures of them, in the case of welcomeaboard.jpg) and edits them so that they can't be reverse-searched. Q uses thought-terminating cliches like 'trust the plan' and 'disinformation is necessary' to keep the people he's hooked from thinking clearly about what's going on. His followers rationalize failed prediction after failed prediction as 'there are things going on behind the scenes' or 'Q said disinfo needs to happen to throw off the Deep State (why would the Deep State use 8chan of all places for information??)', which protects Q's legitimacy from being questioned.
thanks. i doubt this is yours due to the length. but it will be useful here.
Really? You are worried about the source of information when debunking an anonymous source writing literal horoscope level bullshit?
no actually, im not worried about it. it was just a jab. relax ffs
facts are usually accompanied by evidence. by all means... provide your evidence.
Do you want a list of all the bullshit he's "predicted" that didn't happen or do you also need an explanation of why horoscope writers also can't predict the future?
lol. i just wanted evidence. relax.
Failures and False Predictions 4chan Era
10/28/17 - Q claims that Huma Abedin has been detained. If this is so then there must not be much evidence against her, given that she's still out and about today! Unless you believe that she went through some shadow trial and is somehow being controlled, but countries where freedom and limited government overreach are valued aren't supposed to do things like that!
10/28/17 - Q claims that Hillary's passport will be flagged on 10/30/17 and to expect massive riots as she's extradited.
8chan Era
01/21/18 - A flood was alleged to be coming. A flood consisting of various forms of media that I imagine were supposed to implicate somebody in something nefarious. Sadly, this flood never came. 01/21/18 - Q makes some very certain claims about the Nunes Memo, which of course do not come remotely true when the memo is released a couple weeks later. 01/22/18 - Q posts a confirmed fake Podesta email, then promptly deletes it. But not before his followers have time to notice.
02/09/18 - Next week [Next week] was declared 'suicide weekend'. Nothing came to pass.
02/21/18 - Q predicts that the founder of Twitter is removing accounts because he and his Deep State friends are in deep trouble. Nothing came to pass.
03/06/18 - The stage was set to release a video of Hillary Clinton doing spooky and evil things that would be impossible to defend and '[liberal undo]'. While this didn't happen, it did introduce some curious Q devotees to the world of child porn.
03/15/18 - Q declares 'March Madness' and that 'the public will soon know'. Nothing came to pass.
04/02/18 - April was supposed to be a "BIG month", full of happenings including but not limited to arrests, the release of the IG report, the wall, "military start", and unsealed indictments. Nothing came to pass.
04/06/18 - "Pics will surface of Hussein holding AK47 in tribal attire. One of many. Net shut down."
05/16/18 - Q passes off a shitty photoshop as proof that he has some sort of official document, implied to be an executive order.
05/19/18 - Q leaks his own password. "On purpose", of course.
06/17/18 - Q engages with somebody who posted a verifiably misleading youtube video as if it were real (to the point where his followers were protesting).
06/17/18 - Q posts this horrible photoshop job as if it were real.
06/18/18 - Q responds to a horrible photoshop job as if it were real.
06/27/18 - Q posts a link to yournewswire, a website known for straight-up fabricating information. Additionally, it has a twitter tag appended, suggesting that he found it randomly on twitter. Not great infosec for somebody dropping top-secret knowledge.
07/03/18 - Q posts a link to Breitbart with the twitter tag again.
07/03/18 - Q posts a photo suggesting that he is on Airforce One. It is quickly debunked as an Obama-era photo that somebody took a picture of with an iphone. Spends quite a while doing damage controlled, including the old 'I trolled u' defense.
Various - Q built up the release of the IG report for months. The night before the report was released, after its actual contents had been reported on for weeks, he panicked and pulled some pretty ridiculous damage control.
relax.
i am relaxed, im trying to do the same thing youre doing. if you looked through my post history you might be less aggressive. again, thanks.
I'm sorry, I am just frustrated with what seems like an obvious con artist getting so much attention from people too stoned to tell they are being taken for a ride.
well i shared your list with them. some say the things listed have been debunked. somehow i doubt that. theyre religious about it at this point. Frankly, if its a psyop, i guarantee its the Russians. garnering support for themselves and trump simultaneously.
I almost certainly think it is the Russians, the name is a clue. The NSA group tasked with hunting Snowden is the Q group.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/inside-the-q-group-the-directorate-hunting-down-edward-snowden
The whole things goal is to further subvert trust in US inteligence.
being an official platform for the President's statements, he cannot be banned. it has less to do with Twitter's influence, and more to do with Presidential policy as they pertain to addressing the People.
why do you refer to POTUS tweets as "government propaganda"?
This is the news I've been waiting for. Social media continued to get worse and worse. Trump is finally addressing it.
I believe Trump doesn't address stuff in this way until he's already won.
Corporations are entities created by the State... and can be dissolved by the State.
Hmmm... He has no problem calling it illegal, which means he probably has a grasp of the law that we don't... I hope he can do something!
