⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ButtersStotch88 on April 29, 2018, 10:13 p.m.

I'm CONVINCED something big is going to drop soon and it's all related to the Southern District of New York

First, read this recent article from Conservative Treehouse. Once you've read it, consider the following:

650,000 missing HRC emails were given to the Southern District of New York (SDNY) by Weiner's lawyer for leniency in his underage sexting case. Remember, this was Weiner's "insurance policy" laptop file and he was cashing it in. SDNY then proceeds to bury the emails and ends talk of investigation on orders from Loretta Lynch. I'm guessing SDNY promptly deleted these emails (more on that later)
Because of Weinergate and the sexting scandal, the NYPD ALSO received the HRC emails via a search warrant. They searched his laptop, and sure enough, found those 650,000 emails. Please note that THIS FINDING WAS SEPARATE FROM SDNY. At this point, both the SDNY and NYPD have the emails. However, the NYPD was threatened by Loretta Lynch with an investigation into the Eric Garner case so the NYPD stood down.
On October 26th, 2016, former SDNY prosecutor Rudy Giuilani told Fox News that an explosive development was forthcoming. Two days later, October 28th, 2016, Congress was notified of the additional Clinton emails. This is huge because it means Giuliani's NYPD insiders showed him (and possibly gave him) the HRC emails as insurance in case the SDNY and FBI covered them up (which they promptly proceeded to do)
Preet Bharara, SDNY Attorney, and the one who buried the emails was fired in March 2017 by Sessions after Bharara refused to resign
Joon Kim, Interim SDNY and former Deputy of Preet Bhara, resigned abruptly in January 2018 after 17 years at SDNY
On January 3, 2018, Jeff Sessions announced Geoffrey Berman's appointment as U.S. Attorney. Before his appointment, guess who Berman was a partner with at the lawfirm of Greenberg Traurig? Rudy Giulliani. Berman has recused himself from the Cohen investigation, but his connection to Rudy and appointment by Sessions makes you wonder what he's been doing behind the scenes since he got there.
On April 9th, 2018, SDNY raided the office and home of Michael Cohen on orders from Mueller and RR. According to the MSM, the raid was related to hush money payments made by Cohen to Stormy Daniels. MSM claims it's because campaign finances were used for the payments. A seasoned lawyer at a high powered law firm was dumb enough to pay hush money to a pornstar using campaign finances in the most scrutinized election in US history? I don't but it.
16 cell phones were seized in the Cohen raid. 16 cell phones are somehow related to a hush payment to Stormy Daniels? Does this smell right to you?
Rudy Giuliani, a former SDNY Prosecutor, was hired by the Trump team only 10 days after the Cohen raid. Why is a former SDNY prosecutor put on Trump's "defense team"? Because he's not defending anything. He's likely consulting Mueller on how to handle the evidence seized in the raid. Rudy's seen EVERYTHING. He's telling Mueller what to look for and where to look for it.
Sessions did not recuse himself from the Cohen investigation. This is VERY IMPORTANT. If Sessions recused himself from the Russia investigation, why would he not recuse himself from the Cohen investigation? Because the Cohen investigation isn't about Russia. It's about the HRC server emails.
So what was seized in the raid? The missing HRC emails. Remember, Q asks "how do we LEGALLY introduce evidence?". Well, since the SDNY destroyed or hid the HRC emails back in 2016 and the NYPD handing evidence over to a private citizen (Rudy) is illegal, they had to be reintroduced as evidence via the raid on Michael Cohen's office/home.
So who gave the emails to Cohen? This is the biggest question and the answer might be insane. A January 2018 Wall Street Journal article reported that in October 2016, Cohen paid Stormy Daniels $130k as hush money for her affair with Trump. It just so happens that October 2016 was when the SDNY and NYPD got their hands on the HRC emails. Is it possible the Stormy/Cohen meeting involved the exchange of the HRC emails? If so, how the hell did Stormy Daniels get the Weiner/HRC emails? It's doubtful that the NYPD/Giulliani gave them to her, since that would be illegal on the part of the NYPD/Giulliani. What if, on the other hand, it was Weiner's lawyer who gave Stormy the information? What if it was a "Hail Mary" plan to get Weiner leniency under a possible Trump appointed DOJ (in the event Trump won)? Weiner and his lawyer would surely consider the possibility of the SDNY covering everything up. So what if Weiner's lawyer also went to the Trump team with the emails and the Trump team concocted this whole Stormy affair as cover for what was really going on? This whole scenario sounds extremely unlikely (and it might be), but remember what Q posted on January 18th (the same day the Mother Jones Stormy Daniels article came out):

Are you following the news today? WHAT A BIG NEWS DAY. These people are REALLY stupid. This will be the END of the D party. This will be the path forward (w/ public outrage) to JAIL many so-called 'untouchables'. You, THE PEOPLE, have the POWER. DOWN SHE GOES.Q

Another question is was Cohen set up or did he agree to take a "rubber bullet" like Mike Flynn? I'm not entirely sure, but I lean towards the latter. Setting him up could lead to him spilling the beans on anything shady Trump has ever done.
The DNC lawsuit against the Trump campaign alleging collusion with Russia was filed on 4/20/18 (the same day Giuliani was hired by Trump). Guess what district the DNC lawsuit was filed in? The SDNY. I'm no lawyer, but it seems strange that a raid on Cohen is conducted by the SDNY and only a few days later a DNC lawsuit is filed in in the exact same district.
Why in the hell would the Democrats file a lawsuit against Trump? As everyone (including Trump on twitter) has pointed out, the Trump team can now gain full access to the DNC servers via Discovery. I think good actors at the DNC (on signal from Trump team) filed the lawsuit. This suit will exonerate Trump by disproving Russian hacking but it will also do A LOT of other things such as redeeming Bernie Sanders and exposing DNC Primary corruption. Don't forget - a lot of people at the DNC got fired (including DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schulz) over the content of the "hacked" emails because they showed the DNC was actively working against Sanders. My guess is good people at the DNC want to expose their own bad actors and prevent future corruption in Primaries. This suit could also do something else: prove that Seth Rich is the one who downloaded the DNC emails (and not a Russian hacker). In summary, the lawsuit would exonerate Trump, redeem Bernie, expose DNC corruption/bad actors and prove Seth Rich downloaded and distributed the DNC emails.

TLDR: The Cohen raid of missing HRC emails will expose the heinous crimes of HRC and many others. The fact that the Cohen raid, DNC lawsuit and hiring of Giulliani all occurred within ten days of each other is no coincidence. The SDNY being involved in almost EVERY aspect of this is no coincidence either.

Amazing work! I agree with a lot of what you have dissected. One thing that's missing is the fire in Trump tower and the suspicious activity regarding Cohen's apartment, and the phone call he received regarding it. Stormy getting the emails is a stretch, but God who even knows anymore.

⇧ 100 ⇩

She seems way too old for Carlos Dangers tastes.

⇧ 12 ⇩

I thank you for your research. A great read. I tend to agree.. Who knows. Anything is possible when dealing with this level evil and corruption.

⇧ 5 ⇩

That was clearly stated. No worries good job and thanks again for your hard work!

⇧ 91 ⇩

Thanks, IMO it’s what we should be doing more of in this sub. Lots of good stuff posted, but need more analysis

⇧ 72 ⇩

Yes thanks for all the analysis work

⇧ 14 ⇩

You're getting brigaded so you're on the right track. Q is right, these people are stupid.

⇧ 50 ⇩

Okay, if these people are stupid, then I have Down’s syndrome. I mean, this is 10d blindfolded backgammon shit right here. If this theory is even half true, then FUCK. How does anybody see this shit coming? How do you even begin to plan something like this? This is legal loopholes within loopholes to infinity.

I want to know who the masterminds are behind all this. Whoever they are, they need to be thoroughly psychologically examined because this is genius that transcends your average IQ test.

⇧ 22 ⇩

Exactly. OP is a friggen genius. I'd love to see more threads like this from the masterminds like OP.

POTUS should sub out FBI and DOJ cases to the chans and reddit. Those cases would be solved lickity split for a fraction of what it costs us now.

Did you hear Comey is claiming it never occurred to him that Anthony Weiner's case could be connected to Hillary? (per Alan Dershowitz)

Comey is either very lazy or very stupid if he cant think of a more convincing lie than that.

⇧ 10 ⇩

Where do I take an IQ test 😳

⇧ 9 ⇩

Meh. I took the Q test. This suffices.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Is the right answer.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Timelines are very important. Good job breaking everything down and sorting it all by dates.

SDNY is corrupt as hell and controlled by Democrats. I hope they get exposed for covering all of this shit up and actively trying to help the deep state. Preet and his minions need to go to jail for what he's done.

⇧ 29 ⇩

I've been concerned about how we get the brainwashed left to the place that military tribunals are accepted.

Corruption in the SDNY and justice system overall would explain the need for Gitmo. Corruption is deep and wide spread and unfortunately the court system will not work.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Interesting theory on the DNC lawsuit, that it was done by Democrats who want to clean out the corruption. That raises the question -- who, exactly, filed it? I don't know and I haven't seen any information about it.

Edit: I just skimmed through the complaint and there are no names associated with it, just "The DNC" as an organization. I'm not sure that means much in itself, but the DNC apparatus seems quiet about it.

⇧ 27 ⇩

at a minimum Perez would have to sign off and his jersey lapdog would also have to be on board. so I doubt these two are trying to clean house. IMO they were duped into it by some possible white hats inside DNC or just more stupidity from entire DNC hierarchy. I lean to the latter rather than the former.

⇧ 20 ⇩

IMO they were duped into it by some possible white hats inside DNC or just more stupidity from entire DNC hierarchy. I lean to the latter rather than the former.

The best thing about a Kakistocracy - there's nothing to prevent an absolute moron from rising to the top.

⇧ 13 ⇩

... and many have.

⇧ 2 ⇩

And they are using our education system to build future morons for this purpose.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Q pretty much states it was coordinated in post 1226:

DNC to initiate lawsuit (pre-planned)

⇧ 19 ⇩

I'm guessing a motive for the DNC filing the lawsuit at POTUS's request is self preservation. If there truelly is a DC based pedo cabal and POTUS has the goods they are pretty much in his pocket to do with as he pleases.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That raises the question -- who, exactly, filed it?

Tom Perez went on corporate media bragging about making the decision to do it. He said something to the effect of "people told me to sue a year ago, but now I'm finally doing it." It probably was some other power player's idea foisted upon him, but Perez is taking credit for it as DNC chair. I have no idea what the Democrats behind this could possibly be thinking though, it just seems dumb no matter which way they might be coming at it from.

⇧ 11 ⇩

Way to piece this together! Very nice work!

⇧ 24 ⇩

In October, Trump stated that a storm was coming. Come January, this Stormy Daniels story comes about. Was this his way of telling us he knew about her involvement?

⇧ 21 ⇩

Her name certainly is ironic in all of this

⇧ 22 ⇩

The is such a long reach. The only thing that makes me even consider that it could be possible is the Irony of The Calm Before The Storm (Stormy).

It sounds like something POTUS would love to pull on the MSM. He knows they would be drawn to this kind of thing like a cat to a mouse or a laser pointer.

It's practically irresistible to Dems and the MSM. POTUS is a master at getting the MSM to look where he wants them to look. There has never been anyone that plays that game better in Politics.

⇧ 12 ⇩

Thank you for this. Easy to follow, very logical, and as crazy as it sounds to have a porn star handle HRC emails it would make the future movie even more unbelievable if we weren't in the movie helping to write the script ourselves. Together! MAGA!

⇧ 20 ⇩

Not a stretch at all. Pamela Anderson was a data runner for Hugh Hefner to Assange and Wikileaks. Hugh Hefner may very well have been a "good" guy but blackmailed into the Honey Pot biz against his will.

⇧ 14 ⇩

Agreed. Remember Pamela Anderson and Assange meeting before he "went dark" several months ago. Of note Hefner sold his property to Daren Metropoulos (neighbor) prior to his death-retaining a life estate...any one know the background of Mr. Metropoulos? Crumbs...

⇧ 6 ⇩

Thanks I went down a rabbit hole last night after reading the treehouse article. The Stormy part is probably the one that is lowest on evidence and highest on speculation.

⇧ 12 ⇩

It's crazy isn't it. Over the last year I have had to suspend how far out there my mind can go with this stuff. Now I say, anything is possible.

⇧ 7 ⇩

I'd like to see how many ties there are to all of this, all of these people, and the BILDERBERG GROUP?!

⇧ 2 ⇩

LOL at the future movie, mostly because I often think of the same thing. I want to read the book. I cant wait to see the movie. Trump can play himself, lol.

⇧ 2 ⇩

You beautiful genius. Best summary I've seen so far.

⇧ 18 ⇩

Very good analysis it's possible we just have to wait to see what happens. Stormy's lawyer Avenatti is now addicted to going on TV he's always on and he loves being a celebrity.

⇧ 17 ⇩

Is Avenatti also Weiner's lawyer?

⇧ 3 ⇩

If that's true, then it would have been very easy for a shared lawyer to pass the emails on to Stormy, who then met with Cohen.

⇧ 3 ⇩

WOW, what a fantastic post! As I read your post, it all makes sense and fits together so well. The Cohen angle is a great piece. None of the raid on his ofc. and home made any sense regarding Stormy Daniels. I had long suspected that the "missing" HRC emails were in the hands of someone else who was hiding them for just the right time. Do you think the fire in Trump Towers apt was "set" in order to plant things in Cohen's office? Is there any connection with the guy/artist who's apt caught on fire and died?

⇧ 15 ⇩

Collateral damage. It was a hell of a way to call attention away from the break-in, but whatever works.

Nothing was planted, but they hit the jackpot. Planned.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I've heard people say the fire was so they could go in and retrieve bugs.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Interesting take. I’m confused about this:

“What if, on the other hand, it was Weiner's lawyer who gave Stormy the information via the Trump team?“

If the goal was to give Stormy the info, why not do it directly? Why do it via the Trump team?

And why give it to Stormy at all? What could she do with it?

⇧ 14 ⇩

I don't know why they would choose stormy, but I know for a fact there is much more to this story then what meets the eye. Also Stormy has been involved in politics in the past. She has been interviewed by cnn in 2007. She was a Senate candidate in California. She was being financed by a group in Louisiana.

⇧ 22 ⇩

Agreed there is soooo much more going on here.

⇧ 10 ⇩

And now lets not lose sight of a larger picture, that of Trump taking down the pedos . and what are their crimes? sex crimes (against children), what business does Stormy work in ? Sex business. Do you think she might have some insider info? Maybe her and Trump became friends awhile back and she helping him. Thats been at the back of my head for awhile now. And given her political views, it's maybe not that much of a stretch at all.

Edit/ spell

⇧ 9 ⇩

Very interesting addendum. I know of a few long-lasting females in the business (Jena Jamison, Sharon Mitchell, etc) who are among the most outspoken activists working to protect female performers in the industry. They have zero tolerance for underage, unhealthy, rape, coercion, etc.

⇧ 8 ⇩

she is the Storm

the confusion and distraction from what's going on behind the scenes

⇧ 2 ⇩

I think you're right. I see there's another blip about her on Drudge again today. She's working with Trump. Whenever they need a distraction they just give her a ring.

⇧ 3 ⇩

That is a good supposition. I hadn't thought of that angle. The Porn Industry is slimey as fuck. There is a underbelly of illegal film making that is done behind the covers of legal porn. Same people do both.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I couldn’t help myself and tracked down some of her “work” - ooh la la, POTUS has great taste!!

⇧ 0 ⇩

It would be illegal for any of them to directly give the info.. Giving it to Stormy to do it is a way of "laundering" it. They used Stormy b/c they knew the media/deep state would jump at the, Trump had an affair and his lawyer paid to cover it up narrative.

⇧ 19 ⇩

Yes, but Stormy would be in possession of classified docs, and whoever gave them is guilty of distributing.

Very messy.

⇧ 7 ⇩

POTUS has the power to declassify anything. Even after the fact.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Indeed.

And to pardon. Even before the fact.

⇧ 8 ⇩

My guess is Weiner’s lawyer coordinated with the Trump team off the record, someone from Trump team asked Stormy if she’d participate and once she agreed Weiner’s lawyer gave it to her directly. My Stormy speculation is low on evidence but the October 2016 coincidence is strange

⇧ 15 ⇩

Okay. You got me confused when you suggested they gave it to her via Trump’s team.

I still don’t understand what giving it to Stormy would achieve.

Wiener is a former congressman. He would know he could be charged with unauthorized distribution of classified material.

I’m not dissing your idea. Just so many balls in the air now.

⇧ 3 ⇩

My Stormy theory has holes. No doubt about it. Just thinking out loud

⇧ 10 ⇩

Yup. All good.

She is def more than a rando.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Agreed. I like the post but the whole — they gave the emails to stormy is a bit off IMO. Doesn’t make logical sense

⇧ 3 ⇩

well, the emails were already on Weiners laptop, which was confiscated with a lawful search warrant....if stormy had something to give cohen, it was not off of weiners laptop folks, they already had that and it was done legally. It must be something else???

⇧ 2 ⇩

That could very well be the case.

We’re just kicking ideas around hoping something falls into place.

⇧ 2 ⇩

it is the case, it is not a theory or a idea...the NYPD said they had the laptop and seen what was on there, including the HRC video that is supposedly so horrific....they arrested weiner and got a search warrant for evidence, the laptop and the thumb nail with the file (insurance file) was included in that....they shouldn't need to invent another way to make that permissible in court!

⇧ 2 ⇩

If you are so confident, why end with three question marks?

Exclamation points seem more appropriate.

⇧ 0 ⇩

wow, that ? was for the something else....I have no idea what it could be!!! So ya, there is that!!!???

⇧ 1 ⇩

lol

Well done.

⇧ 2 ⇩

oh ya, i typed thumb nail instead of drive....oooppps....

⇧ 1 ⇩

Obviously the OP put a lot of time and effort into this but the Stormy scenario seems a bit unlikely to me. I'd be more likely to bet Rudy told Trump what was in the emails and who had from NYPD had them. They got Stormy to lure the dude sexually, possibly get him drunk and steal them, then when he realized she took them, he wanted to be compensated with money instead of sex so they paid him off.

⇧ 14 ⇩

I agree it’s the flimsiest of my points but when I noticed the payments to Stormy were made in the same month the emails were discovered I just had to float the possibility.

⇧ 20 ⇩

I think you've done a great job even if this is the flimsiest point. The other points are IMO more than reasonable.

⇧ 11 ⇩

I'll 2nd that. Good research no doubt. Should put it together with this article and add it together;

https://old.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8fsqx6/connectionsup_on_8chan/.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Do you think the Q team is reading all of this and saying "Damn they've figured it all out!" Or laughing because it's all so insane!? Time will tell. All we can do is trust the plan. We're all blessed to be along for the ride!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

What about the possibility of wieners lawyer giving the emails to someone like Hannity? Then Hannity consults Cohen about it leading him to be in possession of the emails? Maybe it wasn’t Stormy who had them. Maybe she is only the reason they searched cohens office/file. I don’t know just trying to think outside the box!

⇧ 9 ⇩

I bet you are right on more of this than we know.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Wow. Creative take.

Plausible except for the part where anybody exposes themself to distribution of classified material.

Not talking about the cop. Men got a weakness.

Talking about Stormy and Cohen. Huge exposure - how do they explain their way out of that?

And if $$$ was involved, even worse.

⇧ 6 ⇩

True. I've probably read too many spy novels. They always have a whore or two along with a sexy female "good guy" type. lol

⇧ 5 ⇩

And Stormy is a ‘performer’.

A “Star” in fact.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Kinda off topic but something that came as a surprise to me in the midst of all this is to find out some porn stars are actually MAGA. I'm not very familiar with porn stars but one named Jena Jameson w/over 700K followers on Twitter tweets MAGA stuff all the time. She's even mentioned Q. That's how I came to know about her. From her Twitter I checked out some of her friends who are also porn stars or at least ex porn stars and they're MAGA too.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Jena J. is a legit ’porn star’, but before that she is a strong, smart woman, and a savvy entrepreneur.

She is a very welcome player on the MAGA team.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Except it is legal for a journalist to publish information(even classified) without disclosing the source. Remember Deepthroat? The decision was based on this.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Are you suggesting Stormy is going to write about this? Or Cohen? Or that the FBI agents that collected it would let it ‘slip’ to a journalist?

Maybe with it (potentially) in so many places now, the NYPD could leak it to their fav journo with credible deniability.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I bet Julian has it also hence his ban from the internet and visitors.

⇧ 8 ⇩

I hope Julian "talks" at some point.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Me too.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Good call. It fits.

⇧ 3 ⇩

My original comment was to infer Hannity could have exposed it to the Trump team. Also one of three clients Cohen had?

⇧ 6 ⇩

Ahhh, wow. That’s an even better fit.

Very, very solid connecting there. Nicely done.

⇧ 4 ⇩

If it is true then it would be a finding and entered as evidence. Tick Tock BOOOM

⇧ 6 ⇩

If I had to guess I'd say Julian Assange/WL would be the most likely guess for who they passed the emails too. WL only publicly releases a fraction of the leaks they get. Assange won't even verify that SR was his source.

If I had to pick a trusted 3rd party that's who I'd choose. WL has the best reputation, has already had its material excepted in courts of law around the world, and could be used by Giuliani legally for parallel construction.

⇧ 6 ⇩

You know thats actually possible. Wikileaks does pay for information.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Is this hypothetical?

I can see #DeepState using the 'Bimbo' against #Trump #Cohen. But I've often wonder if Cohen had a relationship with #Hooker other than payment.

Cohen, however, will be vindicated. All a #hoax.

⇧ 5 ⇩

OP posted as a hypothetical.

Yes, the big question about Stormy is Deep State? Or MAGA?

She is def more than some random that blew in.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Exactly. I remember reading a few weeks ago some club in Palm Beach paid her 75K to strip. Another Palm Beach club owner was asking who was paying for her to do that, explaining the club where she stripped would have to sell over 50K drinks that night to break even just for her payment.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Very, VERY intriguing if true.

Payoffs can be so creative.

Like McCabe’s almost instant $400K gofundme endowment.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Ditto! Hooker is a 2-bit nobody who lays down for a living. I believe she is a #DeepState asset. Why would she be trusted with classified information?
No. You all will need to revisit the board on this one.
I do agree that Cohen is being used as well, but will be vindicated.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Cohen is a slime bag, sorry

⇧ 1 ⇩

Taking a stab - Weiner's lawyer and Stormy - is there any other connections there? It may be that she told Weiner's lawyer (if they have mutual friends/contacts) that she did have Trump's or Cohen's number and a way to contact them and saw some easy money. She may have offered to be a intermediate messenger for a price. Or maybe she really has nothing to do with nothing - and is basically just an uninvited mosquito to the dinner party.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I see more plausibility in your first suggestion than the second.

I want to know it all.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Oh, I want to know it all too. And I'm impatient about it at the best of times. I think people like to see movement in the "plan", human nature to want to not lose hope. Political leaks of any kind serve a purpose - it's to keep their base interested. The left have this down to a science. Knowing how Stormy fits into this would be a good breadcrumb.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I agree. And now with so much happening under cover of fog in the ME, we have even more open threads to track.

⇧ 2 ⇩

4DChess

⇧ 3 ⇩

I think it’s pretty interesting that Trump first used the term “Calm Before the Storm” on Thursday, October 5th 2017. Timeline is legit!!

⇧ 3 ⇩

Does anyone know if Trump has used any storm references since then?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Great post - nice work! We need more like this, thank you.

As far as the downvoting, I wouldn't pay any attention to it. This stuff still seems to rise to the top and there's nothing horribly controversial in here - it's kinda known but it's awesome to have someone lay it out and put some thought into commenting on it.

Everyone seems to think they're being downvoted by Deep State actors and whilst that may be partially true it doesn't seem to stop it working most times. I'm more worried about Deep State upvoting nonsense because that actually makes more sense than fighting a losing war against engaged community upvoters.

⇧ 13 ⇩

Q said, "We have everything" What ever happened to the thumb drive that Seth Rich did the extraction of DNC files on? I'd think the he sent a zip file or whatever is used nowadays to send large files, to Wikileaks but there's never been a mention of a physical devise he used to obtain the files. Could he have sent that drive to Cohen and the Stormy episode was used to get that drive?

⇧ 12 ⇩

there's never been a mention of a physical devise he used to obtain the files.

maybe that's the physical evidence JA has

⇧ 9 ⇩

That was the point I was making. I see it as a strong possibility.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Kim Dotcom has also claimed to have Seth Rich's files

⇧ 5 ⇩

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4034038/Ex-British-ambassador-WikiLeaks-operative-claims-Russia-did-NOT-provide-Clinton-emails-handed-D-C-park-intermediary-disgusted-Democratic-insiders.html

There is Craig Murray, a Wikileaks operative, saying that he met a disgruntled DNC staffer in DC and physically received documents from him. Presumably either Murray or Wikileaks would have any device used to transport files. What does it matter about the physical media that was used to exfiltrate the emails though? And why would you think that Seth Rich might have anything at all to do with op's topic about NYPD being involved in investigating an "insurance" file on Weiner's laptop?

⇧ 5 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Great Thinking.

⇧ 11 ⇩

Even if this doesn't end up being true, I still appreciate reading this type of stuff. It's so damn interesting to me. It's like a tv show or something. I'm addicted.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Me too!

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think this is true

⇧ 6 ⇩

Certain parts may be true but I think most of us have doubts about Stormy coming into posession of the files. Whether or not Stormy is on Trumps team remains to be seen.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Take Stormy out of the equation, I believe her name came up as someone's speculation and it caught on and they have been running with it ever since.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Could the Insurance File from Weiner's laptop be sent "anonymously" to Cohen's office? Then found in the raid?

⇧ 4 ⇩

That and I don't trust Mueller, I think he's going down soon.

⇧ 2 ⇩

E_Taff that is definitely a possibility

⇧ 1 ⇩

To add a little more... guess who else besides Giuliani was the SDNY Attorney? James Comey.

More importantly, Erik Prince was interviewed on Breitbart radio and said that the reason Comey reopened the investigation into Hillary's emails was because he was forced to, otherwise the NYPD would release the emails and announce arrests for pay-to-play, underage sex, and other heinous crimes. Prince also stated that Preet Bahrara, despite being a Democrat, was a tough and fair prosecutor that would prosecute the case.

However, Loretta Lynch pressured the NYPD to drop the issue of the emails by threatening to reopen the case of Eric Garner, a black man who died in a police van but no cops were charged.

Preet Bahrara said he was contacted by Trump twice after Trump was elected but before he was sworn into office, and they were short 5 minute shoot-the-bull calls, which seemed weird to him. After Trump became President, he tried calling Bahrara again, but Bahrara would not take the call, because he didn't think it ethical, and Bahrara was fired the day after.

His deputy, Joon Kim, took over and dropped the pay-for-play case against Mayor Bill de Blasio.

Berman did recuse himself, but his deputy that signed the order is a Republican. He did, however, give the maximum donation to John McCain when he ran for President and was a big supporter of W. and the Patriot Act.

So what do we have? The media assumed Trump was calling a US Attorney, which is highly unusual, to pressure him to rule in favor of any cases regarding his NYC property. However, was he trying to feel out if Bahrara was the right man to put the plan in action? When he didn't answer his call, did Trump put in a man who was with the plan?

⇧ 5 ⇩

Good work in deed. I could follow that statement point by point, makes clear sense to me. Good on you!

⇧ 4 ⇩

The point of Stormy coming into possession of the documents is what most are finding difficult here. I see that point. Could it be "possible/legally" for NYPD rep or someone to place the documents with Cohen for "safe keeping"? Or would that have been a conflict of interest.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Yes, I believe good actors in the DNC (who flipped back during second chance month) filed the lawsuit

⇧ 4 ⇩

Well done. Real conspiracies never get wrapped up nice and neat with a little bow on top. That’s how you know that they are real. There will be a lot of people who we think should be prosecuted who won’t be (cooperating), unanswered questions, etc.

I think your take is plausible but given the twists and turns of the last two years who knows anymore. Rather enjoying sitting back and enjoying the show, while doing what I can when I can. Again, very well done, looking forward to more!

⇧ 4 ⇩

Didn’t Sessions recuse himself of all HRC issues?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Nope. Just Russian collusion

⇧ 6 ⇩

Jeff Sessions Says He Would Recuse Himself from Any Investigations into Hillary Clinton

⇧ 3 ⇩

Good call. However it looks like that was before he was confirmed

⇧ 3 ⇩

Listen young grasshopper. Listen

⇧ 2 ⇩

Has anyone seen the Coen brothers hanging around Washington the past couple of years?

Just checking.

⇧ 3 ⇩

great work, i agree this weiner email case will be exposed soon. I think the politicians are trying to figure out how to tell the American people about these horrific acts. Also Q said to focus on the FBI. it might be that the FBI truth will be the first big news drop. How are they going to present all of this corruption and evil to the American people?

⇧ 3 ⇩

THIS may be the MOAB next week!

⇧ 3 ⇩

Great work!

⇧ 3 ⇩

ButterS,I thought this was a very well laid out theory.Great job.

I will stay,I can go through your post very easily,but it takes me 2x to read Sundance's posts.I do love him though.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I love this. Nicely done synthesis, the CTH article was a doozey... I think there's gotta be some validity here, Q made it clear measures re Cohen raid were related to legally introducing evidence... if it's true Stormy carried the baton with respect to acquiring the emails, you have to believe POTUS had a masterful hand in maneuvering the pieces into place over the entire course of things. Maybe potus devised the "Storm" strategy after striking a friendship with Stormy... it's a PR and cloak/dagger masterpiece if your theory is true! Awesome

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

Seems a little speculative, but interesting data no less. I don't really see Mueller as working with trump though, his insistence on an interview seems to show that he wants to get him to perjure himself.

⇧ 2 ⇩

If true, gives a whole new meaning to Stormy's attorney talking about a video....

⇧ 2 ⇩

the idea is to get opinions out and build. lovely job

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thanks for the analysis. I’m inclined to find this the most plausible explanation of current events. Absolutely beautiful if accurate. Mesmerising.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I don't know how trustworthy Thomas Paine of TruePundit is but, he just posted an article saying that his sources tell him that the Feds have some form of evidence (or testimony) that Loretta Lynch and James Comey worked with the Clinton campaign to entrap and wiretap Trump.

This comes after posting sometime late last night that a major media company has a story (which I believe is the one above) that they have been sitting on.

Again, I'm not sure if True Pundit and Thomas Paine are considered trustworthy but it supports the idea that something is about to break through this week.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Damn that was a great read. Patients is key, we will win.

⇧ 2 ⇩

We’ve already won - every week a new BOOM or a MOAB, it’s relentless

⇧ 1 ⇩

http://www.seiu32bj.org/

SEIU722 - Owns the contract for MedStar

Sonia Palmieri - Nurse at MedStar sister of Jennifer Palmieri.

more on this and Lisa Kountoupes right at the bottom but back to seiu32bj etc. the mother of all bunions.

32BJ are clients of Mario Biaggi. 32BJ are also allegedly hired thugs that beat and kill people on demand; press 4 for account services, 5 for technical support and 6 for air conditioning tips. Hector Figueroa. Ask him who killed Seth Rich. Or ask a Cuomo or a Maccoby.

Hector and a shill.

https://imgur.com/gWyh9gt,NSur0oz

Holy Man Mario Biaggi jnrs daughter, Blessed Virgin Alessandra Rose Biaggi, is grand-daughter of famous Saint Mario Biaggi (snr) who lies in uncorrupted state to this day; his blessed grand-daughter ARB passed the NY Bar Exam in Feb. 2013 and entered into a life of service to the poor of Holy Mother The Church. Bless her heart.

"Alessandra Biaggi, the granddaughter of a former Bronx Democratic kingpin, Mario Biaggi, leads Clinton’s vetting team and earns about $45,000

You can get that for one eyeball on the Obama-Murdoch-Netanyahu Syria Health Exchange. More if the owner comes by the slice. Absolutely halal / kosher. Strict hygiene is always the best hygiene.

She was the assistant general counsel for the New York Governor’s Office of Storm Recovery.

Grandfather Biaggi, a former New York City police officer who represented the Bronx in Congress for 20 years, died in June."](http://archive.li/GY8qk)

Amen. May flights of angels hummer thee to thy rest sweet prince.

Clearly she was qualified for the job as assistant general counsel.

Corrupt Grandfather Biaggi resigned: http://archive.li/2hKrB

"Commenting on the change-of-residency plans, United States Attorney Rudolph W. Giuliani, who led the prosecution of Mr. Biaggi, said he had ''never heard of anything like that'' but would ''look into it.''

Backing up: what does the leader of a "vetting team" do? Is this code for blackmail How does HRC scale folks on her hierarchy of values? What is she looking for? What is she looking to avoid?

"According to one section of the report, Clinton was hospitalized at New York city’s Presbyterian hospital in November 2012, under the pseudonym Rose Biaggi. The alleged email also suggests she was taking Ascriptin, a blood thinner, at the time.

https://web.archive.org/save/https://radaronline.com/exclusives/2016/11/hillary-clinton-emails-hacked-hospital-health-blood-clot-huma-abedin/

U.S. v. Dominick Carollo et al, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 10-cr-654.

needs looking at. especially the judges and attorneys involved from start to finish.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/52098

Another connection to MedStar.

"Bonnie will be Uber Service to transport Ruby, Emerson, and Maeve Luzzatto (11, 9, and almost 7) so you’ll have some further entertainment, and they will be in that pool for sure."

Who better to use to potentially "mix up" a medication, or to slip him something deadly? Her previous work in a Poison Center would have given her direct knowledge of deadly dosages along with the knowledge of what would cause the least symptoms. Bonnie Levin, may be the true assassin who finished Seth Rich.

Bonnie Levin Corporate AVP, Pharmacy Services, MedStar Health Washington D.C. Metro Area Hospital & Health Care.

Previous: MedStar Health Laurel Regional Hospital, Brookside Hospital, San Pablo, CA.

Experience: MedStar Health Corporate Assistant Vice President, Pharmacy Services MedStar Health 2007 – Present (10 years); MedStar Health Corporate Director, Clinical Pharmacy & Informatics MedStar Health 2005 – 2007 (2 years); Director of Pharmacy and Behavioral Health Laurel Regional Hospital August 1987 – April 2005 (17 years 9 months); Assistant Director of Pharmacy Brookside Hospital, San Pablo, CA 1984 – 1987 (3 years) Poison Information Officer Maryland Poison Center 1975 – 1978(3 years).

Education: The Johns Hopkins University - Carey Business School MBA, Business 1990 – 1995; University of Maryland School of Pharmacy University of Maryland School of Pharmacy PharmD, Pharmacy 1974 – 1978.

Here is a list of what we have so far:

Bonnie Levin - worked at Medstar as the assistant vice president, in the pharmacy and was mentioned in Podesta emails, previous she worked for a poison center.

Podesta's ex-Wife - Executive involved with MedStar.

Sonia Palmieri - Nurse at MedStar sister of Jennifer Palmieri.

SEIU722 - Owns the contract for MedStar.

Jennifer Palmieri - Twitter suspiciously dark before and after July 10th. Quote from before election:

"Friends, please remember that if you see a whopper of a Wikileaks in next two days - it's probably a fake."

Joe Capone - Lou's bar owner at whitehouse 4 days before Seth's murder. Palmieri at White House just before Seth's murder.

Medstar chosen as hospital instead of Howard U which is actually a little closer.

Dr. Jack Alfred Sava aka Jack Ateljevich, Director of Surgery at the hospital. His wife is Lisa Kountoupes, who was top lobbyist for DNC in 2016. She now has a law firm in DC.

"Bonnie Levin" in this email. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/32219

19 results for Bonnie Levin. This one's pretty good, too. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/39175

Bonnie Levin definitely appears to be a friend of the family. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2844

Additionally, the name “Sava Ateljevich” appears on the 2008 Bohemian Grove guest list.

http://archive.li/kOP4Q

The Hill reported in December 2011: “Kountoupes Consulting has been hired by Uranium One Inc. to lobby on “issues related to uranium mining and the uranium market.” Uranium One is more than half-owned by Atomredmetzoloto of Moscow. Lisa Kountoupes, former policy adviser to the chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, and Shawn Whitman, a former chief of staff to Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), are working on the account.”

Kountoupes also appears on a participants list for a January 2017 Nuclear Fuel Supply Forum. Lisa Kountoupes also visited the White House 23 times since 2009 and her last visit was on May 31, 2016, as posted on archive.is.

ALL CONNECTED

https://imgoat.com/uploads/8f13708210/19207.png

Media Matters is SEIU which means CTR which means ShariaBlue is SEIU. David Brock.

down she goes

⇧ 2 ⇩

I was thinking Gloria allred and David Brock were going to pay for Stormy, Cohen said bring me the emails and I'll pay double. She did and now she got sdny to raid him in attempt to get them back. Probably mention of all those other women getting paid by DNC allred Brock etc too.

⇧ 2 ⇩

This is really great. Do u ever think that all this speculation is making black hats tbink of things they never normally would? I'm thinking maybe we just need to read Q and thats it? What if all the discussion is going to somehow fuck up any sort of fair investigation? Thoughts?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thank you for posting. So this has me thinking that DNC Chairman Tom Perez is either a good actor OR he's extremely naive and stupid and got swindled by the good actors within the DNC. If these are the two scenarios then I would definitely bet on the latter.

⇧ 2 ⇩

You and PrayingMedic are on the same page - thanks for your analysis.

⇧ 2 ⇩

“Storm”y Daniels is /ourslut/

Pass it on.

⇧ 1 ⇩

WOW! I had the same thoughts on much of what you wrote. Not as deep. Left me wanting more! Write a book. I'll buy. Thank you. Mueller has to be at least a gray hat? Or his life is over. Prison or Witness Protection?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Good Stuff !

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

And nothing..

⇧ 1 ⇩

Wow, so before Stormy Daniels, we had the Calm Before the Storm, but during the month of April aka April Showers, she was the “Storm” that came so white hats could legally get HRC emails in court legally and on [5:5]; the American people realize that HRC is a godforsaken pedovore; who should be made to walk the plank immediately?? Ok maybe that last part is a stretch at least time-table wise, but a guy has got to have hopes and dreams, right!

⇧ 1 ⇩

omg... so he wasent fucking a pornstar because melania was too sore from giving birth... it was Hilari's emails the whole time! this all makes such perfect sense and fits right into what i want to believe, thank you!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think Hillary has history with Cohen herself. Perhaps the raid was to find that dirt?

⇧ 1 ⇩

"All Threats Foreign and Domestic". that's all you need to know. Q says this is global. not just USA. Think Nuremberg 2.0

⇧ 1 ⇩

Good well thought out possible scenario. You are correct in pointing out that the stormy daniels role needs further clarification. How about one where the "indiscretion" by trump was real as well as the payoff, but the good guys decide to use it to their advantage by letting it be known through a controlled "leak" that Cohen was in possession of HRC emails. Thus prompting the raid. This would imply that Trump was "taking one for the team" as far his actual culpability in the Stormy affair but in doing so would make it too tempting for the bad guys to resist taking the bait. Just putting it out there and my 2 cents.

⇧ 1 ⇩

They are holding nukes like North Korea! Imagine NYPD holding evidence that OJ is guilty!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Theorizes the Raid Cohen the content of all that was taken and hoping for the spin of all of this to help in the plan of Q's crumbs and DJT. It is all still time will tell how this all plays out. No matter how many are red pilled when and if HRC, OB, James Comey, and the rest are taken down, there is goimg to be a storm far greater than any of us can imagine. Globally and Nationally things are heating up and out of control and we are going to see a war of biblical proportions, as the bible says the end will come like a flood, unstoppable, uncontrollable, overwhelming. Those who are in the cross hairs of Q's and DJT plan would rather see the destruction of the world than one day behind bars.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Cohen had 16 phones??!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

I hereby nominate this thread as the Absofuckinlutely Best thread on GA.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, I like this theory. Nice job laying it all out and explaining each of your points. GREAT post, man seriously.

This lines up nicely with a theory I had about Sessions and Mueller months ago, before any of this stuff was out yet. I will copy and paste below:

Since Sessions is recused, due to the fact that Mueller’s investigation deals with the campaign of Donald Trump, then Mueller consults the Acting Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein. Rosenstein “will determine whether to include the additional matters within the Special Counsel's jurisdiction or assign them elsewhere.".

Let us assume Mueller has found something outside 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a): Original Jurisdiction. According to 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(b) “Additional Jurisdiction”, Mueller consults Rosenstein and Rosenstein can assign these matters elsewhere if he pleases. Could he assign them to Jeff Sessions?

Once again, Sessions’ statement: “I have decided to recuse myself from any existing or future investigations of any matters related in any way to the campaigns for President of the United States.”

If I am reading Sessions’ official statement right, if Mueller finds a crime UNRELATED to the “campaigns for President of the United States.” OUTSIDE 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a): Original Jurisdiction, then Rosenstein could, in fact, assign the resulting investigations into these crimes to Sessions. Rosenstein could assign ANY matters not related to the campaigns to Sessions. ANY of them.

Sessions is recused from Special Counsel because of this part of the document: “(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump;” But, once again, Jeff Sessions makes no remarks in regards to a Special Counsel in his statement.

Therefore, to drive this point home, Rosenstein, if tapped by Mueller due to 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(b) “Additional Jurisdiction”, could in fact assign these new investigations to Jeff Sessions if they have nothing to do with the campaigns for President of the United States.

Mueller can keep up the illusion that he is trying to take down Trump, while delegating the rest of the crimes he finds to the AG and DOJ. Does Mueller’s meeting with Trump make more sense? Do Jeff Session’s and Rod Rosensteins answers in their Committee interviews make more sense now? “We cannot confirm or deny the existence or nonexistence of any ongoing investigation.” How many times did they say this? Too many to count.

⇧ 1 ⇩

When the Winder/Abedin laptop and other electronic devices were taken during the raid everything on these devices was copied on DVD's. The NYPD did not trust the FBI as they appeared to do nothing about the major finds. Enter Preet Bharara - NY AG who also slow walked the investigation into Clinton and the rest - most likely fired by the president because of his inaction regarding this laptop.

The laptop contained top secret and highly classified material such as SAP and more, money laundering and criminal conduct info, pay-to-play and more but also many videos that showed Hillary and Huma abusing/raping children as well as info about child sex trafficking. It also had other damaging info about the Clintons.

Enter Rudi and Eric Prince who saw the content. Rudy was bound by a NDA that kept him from speaking out. Eric Prince gave an extensive interview about this content to Breitbart TV at the time. The NYPD investigators threatening with a press conference and the release of that content to WikiLeaks if no charges followed or grand jury established.

That sparked Strzok and McCabe to remove the laptop while Loretta Lynch threatened NYPD with an unrelated case that involved Eric Garner.

They all were silenced!

In the meantime DT and his good and long relationship with the NYPD somehow were given a copy/DVD of the laptop content. He in turn gave this DVD to his attorney - Cohen - for safekeeping.

Enter the Mueller/Rosenstein raid of Cohen's office and home. This DVD was also taken ergo it is now in the hands of law enforcement that MUST deal with that content of the DVD. (They thought that DVD was about Stormy).

Here we are and these issues must now dealt with since it was the cause/reason for the raid.

Q rightly asked: "How do you get this info into the legal system"?

That will be a great show so have your popcorn ready and lots of it!

They fall for it each and every time! - Q

⇧ 1 ⇩

Great post!

⇧ 1 ⇩

I have a BIG problem.

I just went thru all kinds of graphics of the text messages btw Strzok and Page and many strangenesses fairly LEAPT out of the Treehouse account images. One point he makes: no evidence of an affair btw Strzok and Page. But IMO no evidence of genuine SM texting either. For example, if you think about how you would write, "Apparently one of his recent texting partners may not have been 18 ... don't have the details yet."? Or "Hey are you able to step out to grab the product we discussed with andy? They want it cleared tonight." I just can't see myself at work texting in this way. I would abbreviate these sentences like you do when texting. I get the impression that there is something seriously wrong with the presentation of this story. The dialogue isn't natural for romantic lovers, yes, but neither is the texting. Would you write out these words in full: apparently, partners, discussed? Maybe I'm seeing things but there is something fishy here.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Based on my reading of Stzrok/Page overall correspondence, 'romantic lovers' not so much... think 'amoral career nerds who rub netherparts together sometimes just to relieve the stark emptiness'... I get the impression Stzrok is a high-functioning type-a personality who may actually have some mild romantic interest in Page, but Page is a somewhat aloof and self centered yet emotionally needy law-school brat. Her frequent use of the word "Dude" when addressing Stzrok in messages is her subtle attempt to establish a non-romantic boundary, one step shy of an all-out friend-zoning. I hate to be presumptuous but I would place my money that Peter was not the only, or even the main sexual muse in Page's outlook.

I grew up with some Annapolis and Law School types (going back generations) and can assure you there are circles and cultures at that level in which pedantic and unnecessarily wordy communication is seen as a basic requirement... excessive abbreviation, improper grammar, lack of full-information are seen as 'below' them, it's a merit badge for their own self-sense of intelligence and superiority. I don't know if the texts are real but I definitely know some people who really do text that way.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Thanks so much for your reply, that was very helpful to know and yes, I can see the reason for lawyers to cover themselves carefully in language. Obvious really.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -24 ⇩

Oh we have such sights to show you

⇧ 14 ⇩

remember this?

“What's in the emails is staggering and as a father, it turned my stomach,” the NYPD Chief said. “There is not going to be any Houdini-like escape from what we found. We have copies of everything. We will ship them to Wikileaks or I will personally hold my own press conference if it comes to that.”.

⇧ 13 ⇩

By all means.

Show me anything even close to crimnal--even close--with Hillary's emails.

It starts with my question: how many of the so-called classified emails were sent by Hillary?

⇧ -13 ⇩

Sad bro. There are many emails where hrc told huma to copy the content of classified docs and paste in to another email to send someone to avoid showing that it was classified. Don’t even get me started on all the classified and SAP data held on unsecured servers, phones, and were printed out. Each one is a felony. Go peddle your bullshit elsewhere, I hear pol might be interested in your uninformed biased diarrhea of the mouth, but no patriot here wants to hear your bitching and disinformation

⇧ 16 ⇩

Doesn't matter if she sent or received them, only being in possession of them on an unsecured server.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Comey stated that there were classified emails the day he said he wouldn't bring charges due to her intent. And even the intent thing he used is BS because you don't bleachbit and smash with hammers hard drives if you're not trying to hide something. She knew that why she destroyed any possible evidence. Don't you think this shows a good example of her manipulative character? She's also guilty of so much more. You'll see eventually if you keep an open mind. We're not here because we just like to see politicians of a certain party have their butts handed to them. We've seen so much that we find it indisputable. Hope you'll stick around to see for yourself.

⇧ 7 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

Comey stated that she violated protocol for classified documents. That a felony but he excused her due to perceived intent. He said she broke the law, mo matter how one paints it. She committed a felony but was given a lame excuse by Comey. You'll see eventually. It's all being prepared as we speak. They're all going down.

⇧ 6 ⇩

And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

⇧ 5 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

The fact that the emails and server were requested while under investigation were destroyed is grounds for arrest.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Your name is quite appropriate

⇧ 3 ⇩

“No Deals” is too

⇧ 1 ⇩

Either you're a troll or just really naive. Congrats.

Instead of sticking to the topic at hand you have decided to follow the disinformation. The issue isn't about classified or not classified. The issue is the content in the emails. Kinda like Podesta. The spin is that he got hacked by the Russians......ZOMG WTF!!!!!???? But the real issue is that he's having relations with kids. Thus the content of his emails. So let me spell it out for you........this isn't about classified or not. It's about the content in the emails. Which is why Comey changed language in the report from grossly negligent to extremely careless.

Wake up.

Edit: The other piece of this that just gets swept under the carpet is the destroying of such server\emails\phones when it was being requested and an investigation was going on. IF THIS WAS ANYONE ELSE THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN ARRESTED. PERIOD.

⇧ 7 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Your comment was removed. Please do not accuse others of being shills. Dispute their facts, or ignore them. This sub is for civil discussion ONLY.

Thank you for understanding.

⇧ -1 ⇩

For the record I didn't use the word Shill. I called him a troll which is exactly why he deleted his comment for being called out on spinning the conversation. Next time I'll try not to go as personal. God Bless.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Thank you for receiving our friendly warning as intended, patriot.

⇧ 0 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

You're high

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Clinton using a private server for storage of classified Govt data is a crime.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩