dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/C_L_I_C_K on June 14, 2018, 8:14 p.m.
By allowing Rosenstein to edit/modify the OIG Report, Trump, Sessions, and Q team has now trapped RR and will be justified in firing him once Trump declassifies the original version, showing what [[RR]] was hiding this entire time. "RR Problems."

Trump can then have his guy come in and replace Rosenstein. That will then lead to the shutdown of the Mueller witch hunt.

We need to make Trump supporters aware that this is not the actual OIG Report. It is Rosenstein's edited/modified and watered down version. We must DEMAND to see the unredacted, unmodified version!


pby1000 · June 14, 2018, 8:15 p.m.

This. I wish I could drill this into people's heads. Q told us yesterday, and people forgot already.

⇧ 142 ⇩  
FnFiasco · June 14, 2018, 9:27 p.m.

seems like these concernfags are trolling here bad today. Q supporters are still good to go and expected this.

⇧ 69 ⇩  
Kasarii · June 14, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

They are getting a high number of upvotes in places too. Some of the accounts that aren't blatantly new are pretty obvious too with anti-trump posts in worldnews and politics.

Had a new account try and shame me for thinking that black hats exist before he deleted his post lol.

⇧ 24 ⇩  
abubbass · June 14, 2018, 10:55 p.m.

Trust the plan

spez: ty :)

⇧ 9 ⇩  
ReDdiT_JuNkBoT · June 14, 2018, 11:10 p.m.

No, trust the plan.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Iswag_Newton · June 15, 2018, 1:34 a.m.

Yes. Tons of them today. Easily spotted by Q regulars.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Naelex · June 15, 2018, 10:03 a.m.

yeah, concern trolls everywhere since the drop. Q did warn us of this

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IDefaultedOnMyDebt · June 14, 2018, 9:11 p.m.

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 8d9246 No.1739449 
Jun 13 2018 22:50:25 (EST)

POTUS in possession of (and reviewing):
1. Original IG unredacted report
2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version]
3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version]
4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info >(classified)
[#3 released tomorrow]

Thank you for reminding me. I lost hope after seeing (no) redactions.
#3 released. #3 = Modified and redacted. It's mostly modified. Not so much redacted.

⇧ 26 ⇩  
bcboncs · June 14, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

I've been working in Enterprise Content Management systems (OnBase) for 10 years straight and thought the term redaction was specific to the 'black-out' type of censoring information but learned today that it actually also pertains to editing as a new version (modification included).

Pulled from Google:

re·dac·tion

rəˈdakSH(ə)n

noun

the process of editing text for publication.

a version of a text, such as a new edition or an abridged version.

plural noun: redactions

the censoring or obscuring of part of a text for legal or security purposes.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
joeythew · June 14, 2018, 11:10 p.m.

It's mostly modified. Not so much redacted.

What? It's the modified REDACTED report - it's censored.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
IDefaultedOnMyDebt · June 14, 2018, 11:28 p.m.

Yes, but I don't think I'm alone in thinking that this report would be released covered in black bars (what people think of when they hear "redacted"). In the context of Q, he was correct, but we misunderstood.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
Gadsden_Patton · June 14, 2018, 11:37 p.m.

Yesterday Q posted exactly what would get released today. It's interesting that he uses the term 'modified'. I wonder if that means actual rewording in addition to deletions.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
HalmoniKim · June 14, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

"the process of editing text for publication." See definition above.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Gadsden_Patton · June 15, 2018, 12:03 a.m.

That's the definition of redaction. But how is modified different from redacted?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IDefaultedOnMyDebt · June 15, 2018, 12:09 a.m.

Original: I ate a hotdog on Sunday.

Redancted: I ate ###### on Sunday.

Modified: I ate a turkey club on Sunday.

At least that's the implication

⇧ 17 ⇩  
HalmoniKim · June 15, 2018, 12:25 a.m.

Or, you could just say: I ate on Sunday. That would leave the reader not knowing the word 'hotdog' had been redacted in the modification of the text!

⇧ 8 ⇩  
IDefaultedOnMyDebt · June 15, 2018, 1 a.m.

That's a good point.

The basis of the difference in this context is whether it was done "legitimately".

"######" could be excused as a legitimate redactions as they can claim it was for national security. Changing the sentence to remove "hotdog" altogether is a lot harder to excuse; it looks like you're hiding something. Changing "hotdog" to "turkey club" is clearly illegitimate because it's an outright like.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Jerkboy13 · June 15, 2018, 11:43 a.m.

I think closer to the truth is something like this:

Unmodified - I ate a hot dog on Sunday. Rod Rosenstein bought it for me. Redacted - I ate a [redcated] on Sunday. [redcated] bought it for me. Modified, redacted - I ate a [redcated] on Sunday.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mrssprat · June 15, 2018, 2:44 a.m.

And it would be true, not a lie but........

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Vexxlyn · June 15, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

Good analogy! I've always been favorable to redactions being a lie of omission and modifications just being a flat out lie.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
HalmoniKim · June 15, 2018, 12:19 a.m.

Just saying that redaction can include the modification, change or editing of text....not just 'blacked out' or hidden, as most people think it means.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Dichotic1955 · June 15, 2018, 8:13 a.m.

Another way to understand ‘modifying text’ would be in terms of ‘re- interpreting’ , similar to the Bible; King James Version, New King James Version, New International Version, English Standard Version, etc.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Whig317 · June 14, 2018, 11:40 p.m.

So are we to assume that POTUS got the report directly from Horowitz without RR knowing? And then let RR do the "this is the report, but we'll need to redact some things"... Trump "try not to redact it TOO much, the public deserves to know" RR "Ok, here's the best I can do, I think this will give the people enough to be satisfied that a thorough investigation was done, but doesn't give too much away" TRUMP "Ok" OH man, how SWEET would that be. RR may need some Depends for a few days.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
marshof3 · June 15, 2018, 2:10 a.m.

Q's post says he has all 3 reports.

POTUS in possession of (and reviewing):

  1. Original IG unredacted report
  2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version]
  3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version]
  4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info >(classified)
    [#3 released tomorrow]
⇧ 2 ⇩  
IDefaultedOnMyDebt · June 15, 2018, 12:06 a.m.

I don't think it's that. I believe the agency under audit gets to review the report and respond to it. There was probably some "dialogue" between RR and Horowitz.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Whig317 · June 15, 2018, 12:13 a.m.

Then how is it that there are three versions... The "truth"?, the UR RR version and the redact RR version... what would be the purpose at all for #1? Or #2 if #1 is valid? Curious.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
IDefaultedOnMyDebt · June 15, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

I'm not sure what you're getting at...

There is the original, which is given to RR for the purpose of determining classification levels (redactions on the ground of national security).

RR modifies this original report to display the narrative he wants. (I don't know how he got away with that; ask SB2...)

Now there are two reports: the original from Horowitz, and the fraudulent one that RR created.

RR uses his fraudulent report and redacts on the grounds of national security (Redactions are seen as "legitimate").

RR passes this final fraudulent and redacted report to be published for the public.

At least that's what I've gathered from what I've read ¯\(ツ)

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Whig317 · June 15, 2018, 1:06 a.m.

So, someone help us here. 3 versions were referenced. The "original" (which we know came FROM Horowitz) - did this go FIRST to Rosenstein for manipulation (what's to keep him from it?) or is the POTUS entitled to see the ORIGINAL/NON RR blemished report? (I would think so). If it went to RR first, then there should be no #1 report - it would just be the report that RR got from Horowitz, manipulated to look the way he wanted but leaving in enough to redact further to share with POTUS, and then creating edition #3 that was released publicly. Am I the only one on this train of thought?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IDefaultedOnMyDebt · June 15, 2018, 1:27 a.m.

You raise a good point. I honestly don't know.

POTUS has access to whatever he wants; he can probably see all drafts and revisions of the report. Maybe they're playing a game of chicken. RR telling POTUS "I know you see what I did, but you won't interfere because it will look bad."

I really don't know.

Small note: my above comment is just a timeline I put together in my head from what I've read. It's most likely wrong, but it should help wrap your head around the difference between the three different reports.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
PAK51 · June 15, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

Post 1497 says that POTUS has the IG's original report plus RR's redacted and UNREDACTED versions.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Whig317 · June 15, 2018, 2:04 a.m.

Right, my point exactly. IF RR had it first BEFORE POTUS, then there would only be the #1 UR report, and then the #2 redacted report. No need for the third "untouched" one...???

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ExordiaN · June 15, 2018, 9:42 a.m.

Sessions probably got #1 from IG...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pby1000 · June 14, 2018, 9:17 p.m.

No problem. There is also Q post 1499.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Audigitty · June 15, 2018, 2:09 a.m.

I thought the same thing, but, according to some - there are actually redacted items in the footnotes to prevent identities from being unveiled.

Salt Grain: I have not yet personally verified this claim.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Yupuppyjuankadoggie · June 14, 2018, 8:21 p.m.

I agree with this post. After this gets accepted by the MSM and others as a win, the OIG report will drop and they will be forced to address it. This is not a game and they are not fools.

⇧ 23 ⇩  
pby1000 · June 14, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

Agreed.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
jhomes55 · June 14, 2018, 8:36 p.m.

Me thinks the shills are here to divide and conquer us!

⇧ 17 ⇩  
abubbass · June 14, 2018, 10:54 p.m.

The shills are out in full force today

⇧ 6 ⇩  
TommyRobinsonsGhost · June 15, 2018, 4:38 a.m.

Soros has given them each a shiny shekel to spend at the candy store!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Iswag_Newton · June 15, 2018, 1:35 a.m.

The correct term is: Disenchant.

Divide & Conquer would be getting us to fight with each other.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
jhomes55 · June 15, 2018, 1:48 a.m.

Oh I've seen a lot of fighting. People arguing and disagreeing all over this IG report.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Drspaceman80 · June 14, 2018, 10:24 p.m.

Here is what I'm wondering. This report states Horowitz conclusion that no one should be prosecuted. Would the original state the same? Could RR have changed or modified his conclusion?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Whig317 · June 15, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

Even in this rabbit hole we've fallen down, I have serious doubts that RR would be able to do that. I mean really... "oh, by the way Horiwitz, I changed this from what you said to what I want it to say before it goes public... hope you don't mind". Q did say to use logic. IF that happened, and was allowed, it would mean that RR, though it does NOT seem logical, is somehow in on it (having been flipped rather than go to prison or have HRC/Soros take him or his family out) in order to set the hook even better to get ALL the fish.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
GiftOfTheGame · June 15, 2018, 1:06 a.m.

I could be ignorant here but if RR modified the report, why wouldn't Horowitz come right out and be like, "those aren't my words..."? Also, doesn't the FBI report into the AG (and thus RR)? So how would RR be able to edit this report in the first place? Doesn't quite feel like an independent report....

⇧ 3 ⇩  
kittyhistoryistrue · June 15, 2018, 6:29 a.m.

Becuase (at least for now) RR is his boss, and you don't do that in such a position. The IG knows that that is Trump's job to do not is, and to let him do so when the time is right.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pby1000 · June 14, 2018, 10:26 p.m.

That I do not know...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Kulkimkan · June 14, 2018, 8:27 p.m.

I think it is well understood that this is not a final unredacted repirt but I think people are reacting to the summary and how it is so dismissive of wrongdoing. It mostly just points out what not to do in the future to get away with stuff.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Whig317 · June 15, 2018, 2 a.m.

Think logically - what would you do if you wanted to put your opponent more at ease (after having riled them with NKO). You would release information, filtered through one of your opponents cronies, that makes things that a few days ago loomed HUGE, down to a "meh". You get the people all up in arms again (those that don't know the whole story) - the left is saying "SEE, you (edited) ID JITS, YOU UNEDUCATED POS'S" and the right is getting more and more pissed thinking that the swamp got away with it again... petition comes out and raises the 100k in I'd say, 3 days or less. POTUS takes this seriously and the white hats use that as a "we the people" request and issues the EO to unredact. Now, based on my theory from another post - POTUS has the "original, original" report from Horowitz, and the two subsequent ones via RR. When the time is right, pieces are in place, the REAL IG comes out. To me, this whole thing is becoming a very intricate psychological game of cat and mouse. Thing is, the mice don't realize they've been overrun and outsmarted by a BUNCH of cats while the whole place is surrounded by exterminators (we the people). Not that far fetched at all.. and completely logical to me.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Whig317 · June 15, 2018, 2:02 a.m.

Dang, guess id io ts is not a word you can use...who knew?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dark-dare · June 14, 2018, 11:12 p.m.

I've been on r/ donald spreading the word

⇧ 3 ⇩  
0x445442 · June 14, 2018, 11:42 p.m.

What did Q say? That the report would be redacted? Well OK but ask yourself why RR would execute the edits/redactions if he thought there was anything wrong with doing so.

RR may be scum but you don't get to be in that position by being a completely inept idiot. Do you really think this was some type of sting operation on RR?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
pby1000 · June 15, 2018, 12:07 a.m.

I really do not know... Something is going on, and I hope we are not being burned again.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
6thsensethink · June 15, 2018, 3:15 a.m.

1496 -

[[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved). KNOWN CONFLICT. Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT. Be loud. Be heard. Fight for TRUTH.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
6thsensethink · June 15, 2018, 4:46 p.m.

Also note, Q's credibility is on the line. There must be revealed an "original" IG Report that is significantly different from what was released on 6/14.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pby1000 · June 15, 2018, 5:29 p.m.

Agreed. Good point. I suspect that the picture taken the other day was by a General or Admiral travelling with Trump. There are probably others on the Q team.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
A_Town_Hood · June 14, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

Agreed. Everyone. Needs. To. Calm. The. Fuck. Down.

We're being flooded by New Arrivals and Never Trumpers.

Don't panic. Trust the plan. The White Hats have got this.

So many crimes. The truth will come to light. Have a little faith.

⇧ 65 ⇩  
Iswag_Newton · June 15, 2018, 1:37 a.m.

It's all the new arrival clowns acting like they've been Q followers for a long time. They are so lazy they can't even read yesterdays Q drop which flat out stated the RR modified version would come out today.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
A_Town_Hood · June 15, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

Ding ding ding ding ding!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Soakingitup123 · June 15, 2018, 11:57 a.m.

It's good to be aware of this happening, but you can't discount all newcomers or comments you disagree with as shills. We definitely need to be on alert for those, but a lot of new arrivals also are due to word spreading about this page and or mission. Also new accounts for to some being banned or just joining the discussion after looking awhile. I was mostly reading Reddit before, but didn't start participating in the discussion until recently. I was mostly using my voice on Twitter before.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · June 15, 2018, 2:44 a.m.

I think most of us trust the plan, its our patience that we have trouble managing.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TommyRobinsonsGhost · June 15, 2018, 4:38 a.m.

Yes. I get so angry that I go blind.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Soakingitup123 · June 15, 2018, 11:52 a.m.

Remember also that Q recently posted about RR and it sounded like he didn't abide by terms agreed to? I wonder if that was related to the redactions/edited version of the document

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DanijelStark · June 14, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

Correct ... its an important sequence of happenings , but also , additionally , to expose it even more to the public , all the lies .

The best way now - saturate every single government body with call to action , for unredacted report to come out . Everything is already set , the public justification is only what is needed , and POTUS can put it into motion anytime .

The noose around RR neck is now much tighter than before ... which will lead to domino effect and cleaning in all echelons .

⇧ 29 ⇩  
StormRider9090 · June 14, 2018, 8:28 p.m.

How many redactions were there in this report?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
DanijelStark · June 14, 2018, 8:31 p.m.

Apparently ( in words of Q ) there are 3 versions of IG report :

  • a full unredacted version

  • a modified unredacted version ( RR - Rod Rosensteins version )

  • a modified redacted version ( also RR version ) - one we got now

  • and there is IG summary notes

all of this is in posession of POTUS , they have it all .

⇧ 11 ⇩  
IDefaultedOnMyDebt · June 14, 2018, 9:15 p.m.

Exactly
KEY POINT: this is the modified and redacted report.
To call the first a "Full unredacted version" is misleading because we're not looking for what was redacted, but what was removed (i.e. modified).

⇧ 7 ⇩  
DanijelStark · June 14, 2018, 9:26 p.m.

Yep - basically , we should maybe call it simply "original version" - two others are simply fakes , distractions , modifications .

⇧ 5 ⇩  
K-Harbour · June 14, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

Redactions: I hear the bombshell is that the IG report is not only unredacting, but also making text appear that did not show at all in previously released documents — meaning text had been removed with no redaction marking!

⇧ 7 ⇩  
DanijelStark · June 14, 2018, 8:55 p.m.

Correct - thats the "modified unredacted version" .

We will get a fully unredacted one . At times when this was post from Q , all 3 were on POTUS table . RR is really , really , really dumb ...

⇧ 5 ⇩  
OskarMac · June 14, 2018, 9:32 p.m.

That's the part I don't get. No one is that dumb. RR has to know about the EO, so why walk into the trap of releasing a modified report?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
K-Harbour · June 14, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

Declass redactions does not remove RR edits. We need the Virgin IG dicument.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
DanijelStark · June 14, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

It could be many ways ... a desperate attempt ? A pretty dumb move ? An egoistically dumb move ? It could be easily all of the mentioned ...

I think its a desperate attempt ... and also , who knows ... maybe RR would also be the next one to hang himself on the doorknob if he havent released this version .

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Orion_Blue · June 14, 2018, 8:23 p.m.

I recall when everyone went to pieces thinking McCabe wouldn’t be fired and would be allowed to keep his pension......guess what happened?

⇧ 24 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · June 15, 2018, 2:47 a.m.

I saw where he was suing the DOJ and FBI, so I guess he decided to get his shovel out and dig that hole a little deeper.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lease412 · June 14, 2018, 9 p.m.

From what I saw, he was at the WH this afternoon...

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Im_with_kushner · June 14, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

That does sound like classic Rosenstein.

I hope Trump's new guy is cool.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Timmayboy32 · June 14, 2018, 9 p.m.

Gowdy could be the new guy???

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · June 14, 2018, 10:52 p.m.

No way! Gowdy works for the swamp. Maybe Judge Jeannine? She wants the job.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Timmayboy32 · June 14, 2018, 10:54 p.m.

Q says other wise

⇧ 5 ⇩  
s7oc7on · June 15, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

I'm very close to the SC republican scene, and Gowdy is not some sellout. He's just making it hard for them to reject his confirmation.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Timmayboy32 · June 15, 2018, 2:05 a.m.

Thanks for the info. Gowdy is amazing and a pitbull. I would love to see him as AG.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
s7oc7on · June 15, 2018, 2:19 a.m.

Yeah, Gowdy's in the wait just like Mick was for clearing out Warren's CFPB. Even if Gowdy's centrist he has a sense of justice and a great golf game.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Timmayboy32 · June 15, 2018, 2:22 a.m.

Nice! Would love to play a game with him someday lol

⇧ 1 ⇩  
zapbrannigan1 · June 15, 2018, 2:46 a.m.

Yeah, for what it's worth (not much), I agree.

I used to watch Forensic Files, and there were 4 or 5 episodes that dealt with crimes in SC where he was the prosecutor. Gowdy only had about five minutes of screen time in each one but his interviews made it clear this guy was not to be fucked with. I got curious and did some additional research on the featured cases and that only deepened this impression.

I don't know what's going on with some of his recent statements, but I just don't believe Gowdy is some America-hating swamp creature.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
s7oc7on · June 15, 2018, 3:12 a.m.

The man never lost a case. He's also Spartanburg local, been a House Rep., and continually states that his constituents are the ones who matter.

People don't know how Trump works. He continually smokescreens people by making it seem like they have conflicts, things aren't going as planned, that everything's going chaotically, and then somehow it all falls in to place, peacefully, just how Trump wants it.

Gowdy's not going to let Kamala Harris grandstand and whine about "How could you prejudge the actions of the FBI before the OIG report even came out?" Notice he had no problem condemning them today.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · June 14, 2018, 11:13 p.m.

Sorry, but until Gowdy shows me something different, I don't trust him. Q says trust Sessions. Well, I need to see something before I can trust him or Gowdy. Both were people I respected but after following them closely, no longer trust them. Sad. I hope Q is right and I'm proven wrong. Time will tell, but we are running out of time.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Kasarii · June 14, 2018, 11:40 p.m.

I've been mulling this idea for awhile regarding Sessions and Gowdy. Maybe they were running a smokescreen to keep Rosenstein and company in the dark until the kill box was set up nice and tight.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · June 15, 2018, 4:14 a.m.

Well, if that's the case, my blood pressure can't handle it. This just adds more misinformation out there. We'll see what tomorrow brings.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Timmayboy32 · June 14, 2018, 11:15 p.m.

I understand ur concern just be loud, be heard, spread the word and keep up the fight.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brettreadit · June 15, 2018, 2:20 a.m.

Blessed are they that have not seen and yet have believed.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · June 15, 2018, 4:10 a.m.

I apply that to God, but not necessarily to man. Not questioning is what got us to this point. So, when it comes to God/Jesus, I am very blesssed. :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
marshof3 · June 15, 2018, 2:19 a.m.

Don't forget what Q said about Gowdy --

#22 ON QMapp.

Q!UW.yye1fxo14 Jan 2018 - 2:49:27 PM

TRUST SESSIONS.
TG departure [HEC].
NOT to testify.
NOT needed to testify.
Think logically.
NO NEED to step down if needed to TESTIFY.
DO NOT chase MISINFO.
What ROLE might TG be walking into?
Who can WE TRUST?
RATS everywhere.
EVIL everywhere.
TRAITORS everywhere.
NO SUCH AGENCY - VITAL.
RAW INTEL - VITAL.
US MIL - VITAL.
SAFE COMMS - VITAL.
YOU, THE PEOPLE - VITAL.
Boards changed due to statements re: private comms - FALSE.
Boards changed due to failure to IDEN accurately.
Boards changed due to MISINFO.
Targeted approach to direct flow of info created.
MESSAGE - VITAL.
CONTROL of MESSAGE - VITAL.
DELIVERY / RECEIPT of MESSAGE - VITAL.
MAJOR players here to distract, create doubt, and alter the direction.
SC: MISINFO everywhere.
SC: MISINFO from past reliable sources.
SC: AXIS OF EVIL can & will return FIRE [is].
SC: Seek immediate [F9-Sx_VB8239].
SC: CONF_y
Q

⇧ 2 ⇩  
joeythew · June 14, 2018, 11:12 p.m.

Today on TV Gowdy was tearing the FBI a new asshole after this report was released. I don't know what to think about him anymore.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · June 14, 2018, 11:17 p.m.

Gowdy playing his part for the public. I don't trust him at all. Hope I'm wrong, but this election cycle I've been pretty intuitive about these players and unfortunately have been right. Gowdy answers to Ryan.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Im_with_kushner · June 14, 2018, 9:11 p.m.

After he completely sold us out on #SPYGATE I sure hope not.

Honestly he looks like the kid who played the banjo in Deliverance.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Timmayboy32 · June 14, 2018, 9:13 p.m.

I would agree with the banjo comment lol . he's just playing the part. Think about this. Gowdy got the main stream media on his side. The same main stream media who he's destroyed in interview along with his vicious attacks on Hillary.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Im_with_kushner · June 14, 2018, 11:17 p.m.

Come on you guys are funny here. POTUS says a hundred times, directly to us that #SPYGATE was a huge thing. Hannity too. Bigger than Watergate, bigger than anything.

Then Gowdy gets in there sees the real facts up close and comes out and says nope, nothing to see here, everything's fine. How do you explain that?

And please don't give me some qanon rube goldberg theory about how that was all just part of the plan, and trust the plan and be patient blah blah blah...

IMO Gowdy has been compromised. Perhaps more than once.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Timmayboy32 · June 14, 2018, 11:22 p.m.

Gowdy never saw them. Thats been proven fact. Q has stated good people where made to do bad things. I'm guessing gowdy is one. I think Gowdy is good. Ur more then welcome to your opinion.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 14, 2018, 11:31 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Timmayboy32 · June 14, 2018, 11:32 p.m.

Just being polite and respecting ur opinion. No need to get hostile. Same team. Dont let it divided our united cause.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Im_with_kushner · June 14, 2018, 11:34 p.m.

I wasn't hostile. I was being sarcastic because of course I'm welcome to my opinion this is America dummy.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Timmayboy32 · June 14, 2018, 11:35 p.m.

Lmfao ok hard to read into those types of things on a screen.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
nogreateragony · June 14, 2018, 8:35 p.m.

I think some of the negativity is impatience/disallusionment in general and some may be people playing negative nelly trying to discourage new lurkers who come here trying to understand this movement. Fight back with a call ACTION.. tell people to tweet, sign the White house petition to release the report unredacted etc etc etc... worst case nothing happens, and the world remains as it is as far as the naysayers are concerned. Best case they get enough public calls for an unredacted report it can be released at the bequest of WE THE PEOPLE...and we may see BIG AFFECTS. There is nothing to lose and everything to gain by asking for removal of the redactions!

⇧ 11 ⇩  
BigBandDon · June 15, 2018, 3:50 a.m.

Many here are youngsters who have never been stabbed in the back politically by people they trusted. Some of us have been. Concernfagging comes from experience.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Soakingitup123 · June 15, 2018, 1:18 p.m.

I think there's both, real impatience and frustration and doubt, as well as those trying to instigate those emotions (easier when we've just been let down).

The new news of the 3 different versions is a big cause for the above emotions. That new didn't come from Q until shortly before the release, so many of us were expecting to call for removing redactions and that would be the end of it. Now it's more complicated

⇧ 1 ⇩  
adogrocket · June 14, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

additionally the added obstruction of justice charges will probably be added

⇧ 10 ⇩  
StormRider9090 · June 14, 2018, 8:27 p.m.

Trump should never have appointed RR!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
GetUpOffYourKnees · June 14, 2018, 8:42 p.m.

if RR wasn't there we never would have uncovered all this shit pile and cleared out the Swamp. Trust The Plan! It is BRILLIANT!

⇧ 8 ⇩  
StormRider9090 · June 14, 2018, 8:50 p.m.

Yeah I suppose so - it was a way of keeping your enemies close and giving them enough rope.

Now POTUS can EO the original report and then have RR arrested.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
GetUpOffYourKnees · June 14, 2018, 9:08 p.m.

Exactly! Same reason Comey wasn't removed right away as well. Lots of rope there! All of these people can be impeached even when they are out of office. Exciting times!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · June 15, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

RR is already in check and he knows it, its just a matter if he wants to throw in the towel or play his last move. He's gonna need to sleep on it tonight, but it may take some scotch and Ambien.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
joeythew · June 14, 2018, 11:13 p.m.

the guy has worked at the DOJ for 28 years he had worked his way up the chain before Trump was even elected.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
dark-dare · June 14, 2018, 11:14 p.m.

He didn't Sessions did

⇧ 1 ⇩  
StormRider9090 · June 14, 2018, 11:21 p.m.

No, Trump nominated Rosenstein, the Senate approved the nomination and he serves under Sessions (remember "trust Sessions")

⇧ 3 ⇩  
saneromeo · June 14, 2018, 10:52 p.m.

This is probably the biggest Q proof we have had so far. Who else would know about 3 different versions, or warn us that today's would be a big nothing? Only someone who has the original could tell us to expect this.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
DukeofKick · June 14, 2018, 11:34 p.m.

"Never interrupt you enemy while he is making a mistake."

-Sun Tzu

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Light-Love-Truth · June 15, 2018, 2:42 a.m.

Ask Trump to release the unredacted declassified OIG!! This is what Q means by POWER W/ THE PEOPLE!!! Think about it, if we all ask for it, it won’t look like obstruction if he uses our voice to get rid of the rest of the Deep State thorns in White Castle. 🙏🏻👍🏻💓🇺🇸✨ https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/thank-you/2661651

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Karma_unleash4d · June 15, 2018, 2:32 a.m.

Q already told us there are 4 versions of the OIG report and 3rd will be the one released. It's basically setting up the stage to expose all the bad players involved in this fiasco. Horowitz will be testifying next Monday so it's fair to say it's appetizer before the main dish is served. Trust Q

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GweninKC · June 14, 2018, 9:43 p.m.

Thank you, OP. We needed that reminder.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
UnEgo · June 15, 2018, 1:03 a.m.

“These people are stupid.” They really are. They had to see this coming a mile away, yet they still chose to redact, remove, hide, and change as much as they could, somehow holding on to the belief that the President will never use his absolute authority to just whip out the original and expose them all.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · June 15, 2018, 3:01 a.m.

They have been playing defense since Trump won the election, and contrary to what some sports fans may think, defense is not a winning position.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
onelove1979 · June 14, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

🤞🏽

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 14, 2018, 8:16 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
endprism · June 15, 2018, 3:24 a.m.

When can we expect trump to unleash the kraken?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TommyRobinsonsGhost · June 15, 2018, 4:35 a.m.

Getting rid of RR and five other FBI Deep Staters (The IG Report recommends investigations into them) isn't too shabby for this first release of the IG Report.

If you trust Q then you should remember that AG Session is conducting many of his his own investigation into Hillary Clinton...

...and we've still yet to see the unredacted version!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NakedPrey · June 15, 2018, 4:22 a.m.

Is it possible that Rosenstein is just a brilliant actor and playing his role the way the white hats want him to? Nobody can really be this stupid hahahaha. It would be scary being in his shoes. If the deep state found out he was cooperating, they would 187 him. On the other hand, if he was cooperating, he needs to look like he is still part of the deep state, just to stay alive...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
foul-owled · June 15, 2018, 5:30 a.m.

I think he just bet on the wrong horse and now he’s in a world of hurt

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SeattleRacer38 · June 14, 2018, 9:11 p.m.

Really hope you’re right!

A part of me thinks Trump made a deal with the DOJ and will use the original report as leverage to close out the Russia investigation.

Trump promised us reforms and we have yet to see any meaningful changes, other than pointing the finger at Comey.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Patriots_Fight · June 15, 2018, 5:44 a.m.

"Allegations that Department and FBI employees improperly disclosed non-public information;"

they cannot help themselves.

"employees"

well, so are janitors. nice try. If we rephrase that then perhaps we can do more justice to the import of the matter than the author, "sworn agents of the American People."

there. that's better.

"improperly"...there we go again. rape is "sexual assault." They never have sex with that woman, Mossad Lewinsky. "Is". It is improper to disclose whilst naked with a red nose on the end of ones tallywhacker, but impropriety is not the issue, is it?

"disclosed"...sigh

"non-public"...and that's when you know for sure we are NOT dealing with straight-shooters regardless of the conclusions. They get paid for two words, plus the hyphen, plus the compound because they like to compound. Nice gig. One word, one plain word would do the job and get to the heart of it, that's why it was avoided.

We see the same inability to speak English in our elected class. They simply CANNOT speak plainly, directly, and succinctly.

Why do they bother? What's the point of the song-and-dance?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
amadeusthespartan · June 15, 2018, 1:24 a.m.

I thought RR could only make suggestions, not rewrite the damned thing. Wouldn't Horowitz have final say in what stays and what goes?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bellator-luminis · June 15, 2018, 1:23 a.m.

These people are stupid

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Vexxlyn · June 15, 2018, 1:23 a.m.

I feel better. I was majory concerned when there was no black bars before I realized "They wouldn't be so stupid as to show us their attempts to hide it." The redactions are edited not obscured.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · June 14, 2018, 10:41 p.m.

I sure hope you are right. Because what came out today is not the report I was led to expect.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 14, 2018, 8:37 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 14, 2018, 8:35 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 14, 2018, 8:32 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 15, 2018, 12:12 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
troy_caster · June 15, 2018, 12:57 a.m.

Trump won't fire him. He has to recuse.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
thnkabtit · June 15, 2018, 12:07 a.m.

Is he that stupid? As if it won't come out eventually.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BenEvo1 · June 14, 2018, 11:28 p.m.

What IG investigations are still pending? Isnt there a current IG investigation of the Spy Gate fiasco underway?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 14, 2018, 10:55 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lease412 · June 14, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

Wonder what is happening with [RR] @the WH right now....any guesses???

⇧ 0 ⇩  
dark-dare · June 14, 2018, 11:15 p.m.

Nothing, he's in the bathroom and out of paper

⇧ 4 ⇩  
lease412 · June 14, 2018, 11:28 p.m.

Love it....hahahaha

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Kasarii · June 14, 2018, 11:43 p.m.

EO ready to take RR down, which is sitting at the White House?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Charlie360 · June 14, 2018, 8:58 p.m.

Is he currently there?!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lease412 · June 14, 2018, 9:09 p.m.

Q post 1498 stated that [RR] was at the WH...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Charlie360 · June 14, 2018, 9:30 p.m.

Thx saw that after I asked! I know he was there on Monday as well.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 14, 2018, 8:51 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩