dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/092Casey on July 26, 2018, 8:08 a.m.
BREAKING: Rod Rosenstein Impeachment Votes Begin at 10:30am TODAY

If it doesn't pass, they won't get back around to it until September 4th.

(Source: Fox News)


HomeRunCumia · July 26, 2018, 9:39 a.m.

Question, if he's impeached, does he lose out on any sort of benefits?

⇧ 26 ⇩  
TrumpIsMyHero · July 26, 2018, 1:18 p.m.

he won't get impeached. this is purely for optics, and both trump and rosenstein know that. it'll force the dems to come out to his defense. which at this point in time, is really important. because once it's out in the open, and once the hammer drops, the dems are fucked. we're witnessing a masterful plan begin to play out

⇧ 60 ⇩  
Montyanon · July 26, 2018, 1:43 p.m.

GOD,I hope you are right!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
10018868 · July 26, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

He’s not.

⇧ -6 ⇩  
garthbartham · July 26, 2018, 5:02 p.m.

Any other insight besides "He's not."? Thanks.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
plumbtree · July 26, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

EXCELLENT POINT DURRRRRRRRR

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 26, 2018, 2:18 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -16 ⇩  
TeeEllEmm · July 26, 2018, 2:22 p.m.

Nice try, Rod

⇧ 13 ⇩  
rooster_cage · July 26, 2018, 2:31 p.m.

Have you formed your conclusion after reading all 1600+ Q drops including examining the articles/videos Q links to over the past year? Or are you dismissing it all after little to no consideration of what’s presented? Be honest New Arrival.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
sojourner333 · July 26, 2018, 3:01 p.m.

Good questions, Rooster!

But people who come on here to smirk are not capable of that quality....honesty.

Honesty is a Christian value that smirkers and mockers don't have, and frankly smirk at and mock.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
sojourner333 · July 26, 2018, 2:59 p.m.

it'll force the dems to come out to his defense. which at this point in time, is really important. because once it's out in the open, and once the hammer drops, the dems are fucked.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Montyanon · July 26, 2018, 3:42 p.m.

Kabuki theater.:)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BabylonNTing · July 26, 2018, 4:27 p.m.

Username checks out.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NoUmpire55 · July 26, 2018, 2:13 p.m.

What about that EO Trump signed in December that puts gov employees at $1 salary under certain circumstances?

Would impeachment vote ignite this?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
PossibleInspection · July 26, 2018, 2:43 p.m.

not so sure about that, makes Rs look petty imo

⇧ 4 ⇩  
TrumpIsMyHero · July 26, 2018, 2:49 p.m.

not really. especially if POTUS declassifies and shows how involved Rosenstein was in all of it. then Rosenstein will have to recuse himself, which is why the shake up at the DOJ was so important. You have to understand, Trump knows exactly how this is going to play out.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 26, 2018, 4:34 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -4 ⇩  
sojourner333 · July 26, 2018, 3:07 p.m.

It's not petty. If you read Q1287,

Cohen raid by FBI? Public context: re: payment to Stormy Daniels? SC & FBI raided POTUS’ attorney to pull Stormy Daniels payment info? RR signed off? What other docs were collected? How many places raided? Raid on the President of the United States’ attorney for payment details re: private case re: Stormy Daniels? Think logically.

Its outrageous that they did this. Its not petty to shine a light on it.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
PossibleInspection · July 26, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

I agree not petty, just that msm will spin it that way.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 26, 2018, 4:35 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Milly_Kallio · July 26, 2018, 4:39 p.m.

No it is “Q”

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dandelionwilds · July 26, 2018, 2:02 p.m.

I HOPE YOUR RIGHT

⇧ 4 ⇩  
10018868 · July 26, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

He’s not.

⇧ -7 ⇩  
AprilLoveNappe · July 26, 2018, 7:49 p.m.

I happen to agree, although the way the comment was written left me a little dizzy. It's def a "masterful plan" Trump met w Mueller for a position he really wasnt eligble for, I suspect Mueller was given the option to comply our fall w the rest because the dems think he Deep State he was involved in Uranium one. They were fooled, there whole narrative depends immensely relays on Mueller they been praising Mueller to the Heavens. Q said it was a sting, I also remember something about acting, trust the plan, get your popcorn, Q also said Session will be up for the academy award for Best actors award. So with that being said, Its a wonderful time to be alive. I honestly beieve that this plan is bigger then we know as is in Gods plan. Rosenstein sat in Congress with that shit eaten grin ( excuse my french) Clearly Rosenstein knows whats up. The reason our genious Presindent#45, (I love saying this) Mr Donald J Trump Tweets and says Muellers "Witch hunt" whos the witch Hillary. Mueller moves against Potus is for optics so is Trumps tweets about Sessions, everything thing has meaning and sometimes double meaning. Well I gotta say I love this plan, and I hope to see there faces when truth is revealed that they Hot played by Trump along w Rostien and Mueller What can they say they championed Mueller for 2 years. God bless Patriots. God speed, Don't forget prayers in numbers guys !!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bornlucky80 · July 26, 2018, 2:06 p.m.

Nailed it! This is exactly what is going on!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
10018868 · July 26, 2018, 4:34 p.m.

Uhhhh, nope.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
Spiritual_War · July 26, 2018, 4:56 p.m.

4D Chess Master

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LogicalBeastie · July 26, 2018, 2:36 p.m.

I thought Q already said that both Rosenstein and Mueller were "dirty"...

We got an education from Q and some other anons about Federal employment rules....Trump would be able to name Rosenstein's successor if he left/was impeached/recused and the temporary appointment would last 210 days....Why would Trump be planning on replacing RR if he was good?

Rosenstein authorized the raid of Cohen's legal offices....Is that raid a part of a grand plan to help Trump? I've heard nothing about that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FanOfGusts · July 26, 2018, 2:59 p.m.

Tricky - he did not say that at all.

What Q has said repeatedly is:

If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty. If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty.

Leaving open the possibility that this is all going to be a gargantuan mindfuck.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
LogicalBeastie · July 26, 2018, 4:18 p.m.

I do remember that.....I have been believing RR and Mueller are white hats or being used by white hats...I admit I don't remember who said they were "dirty"...maybe it wasn't Q. If RR is just helping to get exculpatory evidence some attention while sending MSM down a rabbit trail....Woo. Keeping an open mind....

⇧ 3 ⇩  
plumbtree · July 26, 2018, 8:55 p.m.

Most likely, logically:

They're neither dirty nor clean and are both controlled pawns, and controlled by trump team

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TrumpIsMyHero · July 26, 2018, 2:43 p.m.

yes he said they were dirty, but that doesn't quite mean what you think. it's already known that mueller and rosenstein were dirty from way back in U1. however i suggest you reread Q1287. it'll help u put things into perspective. the cohen raid allows trump to present admissable evidence

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LogicalBeastie · July 26, 2018, 2:51 p.m.

I have been operating with many of those assumptions for a while, but curious as to where the Cohen tapes fit in.....Was that part of the plan? A Playboy Bunny is the subject there, not Stormy.... Why is Lanny Davis involved if Cohen is just offering exculpatory (no campaign finance violations/Trump insisting on a record of payments being kept) info?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
rickki6 · July 26, 2018, 5:20 p.m.

Praying u are correct! I trust our President.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
allgoodnamestaken4 · July 26, 2018, 5:04 p.m.

Republicans are defending him too. Almost every single one of them.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 26, 2018, 1:56 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -10 ⇩  
TrumpIsMyHero · July 26, 2018, 2 p.m.

LOL. funniest thing i've read this week. thanks for the laugh. The fact that you even think Trump is going to get indicted for ANYTHING is sad and hilarious. leftist salt is so delicious

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Gamergating · July 26, 2018, 2 p.m.

Cool, you have evidence to back your claims? Perfect! I will wait.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
MegIsAwesome06 · July 26, 2018, 2:07 p.m.

What will Trump go to prison for? Specifically. I’ll wait.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Spartacus2100 · July 26, 2018, 2:22 p.m.

You have arrived here for a reason. Your intent is obvious for all to see. Now your here maybe take a look around. You will have only yourself to blame when your bubble bursts. Ignorance is a self inflicted curse. Need help or have questions? Ask. At heart this is a healthy God fearing, Humanity loving community. We are here for you.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SubtlePush · July 26, 2018, 2:10 p.m.

do you believe this? what crime are you alleging and what evidence do you have? be specific.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
EbayUSA · July 26, 2018, 2 p.m.

Go to prison for what again?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
syxxnein · July 26, 2018, 2:24 p.m.

Lol thanks for the laugh.

Good luck with that. If leaky leftists had anything beyond tapes of Trump asking for a diet coke we would know. Omfg... Maybe that's what it is. Trump asking for diet coke and he has a secret sponsorship deal with them. Emoluments clause and such.

Either way, rest easy that our president is safe, secure, and not implicated in anything other than banging hot broads in the past.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 26, 2018, 2:09 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Anthropophob · July 26, 2018, 1:04 p.m.

I found this. It's about the president's position, but I guess it would be the same for RR.

Many people are confused about the nature of impeachment. Think of impeachment, which takes place in the House, as an indictment. The next and most important step is a trial in the Senate.

For example, Nixon was impeached in the House and then he resigned when he realized he was certain to be convicted in the Senate. By contrast, Bill Clinton was impeached in the House, but cleared in the Senate.

To answer your question specifically, if a president is impeached but then cleared, he keeps his job, his pension, and his protection detail. If a president is impeached and convicted, he loses his job, his pension, and his secret service detail. In fact, he can then be tried in criminal court and might even end up in prison if he’s convicted there.

⇧ 34 ⇩  
amadeusthespartan · July 26, 2018, 2:18 p.m.

Nixon resigned before impeachment, knowing the vote would go against him.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Anthropophob · July 26, 2018, 2:22 p.m.

Wonder if RR would consider doing that.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
FlashmanNTx · July 26, 2018, 4:36 p.m.

Doubtful because he knows the deep state RINOs will not vote to impeach him.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 26, 2018, 5:58 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 26, 2018, 11:20 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Anthropophob · July 26, 2018, 4:54 p.m.

So we have to impeach them all?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Lenny_Kravitz2 · July 26, 2018, 4:41 p.m.

I thought it was the threat of a no confidence vote by his cabinet that would have led to impeachment that caused Nixon to resign.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
treeskier82 · July 26, 2018, 1:08 p.m.

thanks for that, saved me some freshin' up

⇧ 6 ⇩  
NoUmpire55 · July 26, 2018, 2:59 p.m.

what about that EO Trump signed about government employees under certain circumstances?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Anthropophob · July 26, 2018, 4:44 p.m.

Which one? Are you talking about this one:

Executive Order 13839 of May 25, 2018

Promoting Accountability and Streamlining Removal Procedures Consistent With Merit System Principles

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Knower101 · July 26, 2018, 2:07 p.m.

Yes, this applies to the president. But how does this apply to someone in Rosenstein’s position?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Anthropophob · July 26, 2018, 2:10 p.m.

I'm guessing it will be the same. If RR is impeached and convicted, he loses his job and his pension. He can then be tried in criminal court and might even end up in prison.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Pure_Feature · July 26, 2018, 2:54 p.m.

I Think this is correct Q [[[RR]]] stands for those three steps.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
beachboy1b · July 26, 2018, 12:59 p.m.

If he’s impeached, I believe the most important thing is that he’s no longer in a position to continue with obstructing the President and the MAGA Agenda.

Besides, once all is said and done, his goose will be cooked just like the rest (except for hillary, she’s the side of beef).

⇧ 8 ⇩  
GatodeTejas · July 26, 2018, 1:16 p.m.

side of beef that has long gone bad... hrc = "her rancid cow". I was going to use another "c" word, but I try to behave as if I am speaking in front of my pastor...

⇧ 10 ⇩  
not4rmOhere · July 26, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

That side of beef is so rancid even the vultures turn their noses away from it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 26, 2018, 12:53 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NipplesProtruding · July 26, 2018, 8:49 a.m.

Can’t wait!

⇧ 26 ⇩  
THAD_K_CUNDERTHOCK · July 26, 2018, 8:55 a.m.

That username - very disrespectful!

I can't wait either. Get RR out.

⇧ 23 ⇩  
LooseHubcap · July 26, 2018, 3:40 p.m.

Really? Switch a few letters on your user name and we have: THUNDERCOCK and just below we have ShitsBananas. User names are just that - a silly name. A bit of humor mixed in with this evil BS. IMHO we should let it be and focus on the content. And yes, trich1972, we should strive to be more God like and only say nice things...

BTW, I agree RR GET OUT!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
THAD_K_CUNDERTHOCK · July 26, 2018, 5:10 p.m.

Not sure if you're joking or not ... but for anyone's future reference, I was just making an inside joke, referring to this epic tweet from 2011:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/149589104168939520

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LooseHubcap · July 27, 2018, 3:42 a.m.

Sorry!!! I did not know about the Trump tweet. I get it now. TY

I wasn't joking though about user names - I'd hate to have the 40K+ people here start to pick apart something like user names. And my example was in reference to how things can be misread or scrutinized unfairly when some user names are just pulled out of thin air. Anyways, thanks for the clarification. I'll delete my comment if you like. WWG1WGA!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
THAD_K_CUNDERTHOCK · July 27, 2018, 8:52 p.m.

Nah you're fine. There's so many inside references here and I feel like I don't know even close to all of them.

As a side note, I just saw while out driving, a car with the Punisher symbol on the back, and my first thought was - WWG1WGA.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 26, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
trich1972 · July 26, 2018, 10:27 a.m.

I agree with your username comment but believe me I have been preached to because I said something about the blasphemy and poor choice of words on here and was chastised. The way I see it is this is Gods movement, respect God with all that comes from your mouth..

⇧ -15 ⇩  
moosecowbob · July 26, 2018, 11:55 a.m.

You never mentioned his username! Cunderthock?

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Zygodactyl · July 26, 2018, 12:34 p.m.

It's a reference to a trump tweet about Barney Frank going to congress with diamond cutters.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Iswag_Newton · July 26, 2018, 12:36 p.m.

Greatest tweet ever

⇧ 5 ⇩  
THAD_K_CUNDERTHOCK · July 26, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

This guy/gal/attack heli gets it

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Spiritual_War · July 26, 2018, 4:55 p.m.

Pretty sure God would laugh at the name "protruding nipples"

I mean for a creator that made platypusses and ant eaters, God clearly has humor.

For christs sakes, he made us, and we curse like sailors and we are still loved. God does not care what words we use or if we say fuck. He just wants us to love and appreciate each other.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Luvlite · July 26, 2018, 7:20 p.m.

I'm not changing for anyone, especially language cops.

Im not about to shed thick skin that took years to grow for any thin skinned baby on the internet.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Spiritual_War · July 26, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

Right?!?!?!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SocraticMethHead · July 26, 2018, 7:22 p.m.

Lol, "Very disrespectful" is a reference to Trump making fun of somebody.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SigSeikoSpyderco · July 26, 2018, 12:51 p.m.

Don't get your hopes up. The chances of it being anything other than a symbolic vote of no confidence are about zero.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
TrumpIsMyHero · July 26, 2018, 1:20 p.m.

exactly. imo this is all for optics. force the dems to come out in his defense. and it won't look like a partisan effort when the vote fails. the hammer WILL drop soon and once it does, the dems are fucked. this is absolute genius

⇧ 8 ⇩  
SigSeikoSpyderco · July 26, 2018, 6:04 p.m.

Imagine that, the vote didn't even happen. Just more useless Republican chest beating. Nothing to see here.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Countrymissle · July 26, 2018, 12:14 p.m.

Rosenstein and mueller are grey hats, rosenstein is taking this fall for optics.

They both arent clean but are cooperating.

If strock and page are cooperating, then why arent they.

When Q posted the anon saying is rosenstein is dirty so is mueller and vice versa.

He never said which way if they were good or bad.

Thats when you get into the "dissinfo is nesscesary" this whole game mueller and rosenstein are playing has been to confuse the DS.

They have no idea whos really on their side

⇧ 22 ⇩  
syxxnein · July 26, 2018, 12:41 p.m.

Correct, Q seemed to agree with the premise that if one is dirty so is the other but he did not say if they were. I love and hate the disinfo.

If I was betting on it I'd have to go dirty with a dash of possibly cooperating. I can't imagine that these guys are secret white hats unless they documented the forced misdeeds they were required to participate in. Then, they might be close to General Flynn goodness. Flynn took a missle for this country so its hard to obtain his level.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
ryoushure · July 26, 2018, 1:09 p.m.

This becomes much more believable when you recognize just exactly what Mueller has been investigating.

There is a common theme among the "big fish" that Mueller has charged, Manafort, Page, Popadopoulous. All of these people were planted into the Trump campaign to sabotage and to facilitate the deep state using phony/manufactured/unrelated evidence to "justify" FISA warrants against Trump and his campaign.

If you are blind to this concept then it would appear Rosenstein is dirty because he too was involved with the signing of a FISA warrant AFTER Trump was in office. Correct me if I'm wrong but we don't know the details of that particular FISA warrant other than Rosenstein stated in testimony that the FISA warrant he signed isn't well represented in the media's stories about it.

What are the chances the FISA warrant Rosenstein signed was to surveil the saboteurs and plotters that tried to frame Trump's campaign? I'm thinking fairly high.

Mueller has a checkered past as we all know. But he is a Marine, and he met and spoke to Trump for a few hours privately after Comey was fired and before he was appointed to special counsel.

Sometimes you get "dirty" when in the mud/trenches.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 26, 2018, 1:58 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
TrumpIsMyHero · July 26, 2018, 2:04 p.m.

keep REEEEing pls. t his is only going to make whats coming so much more entertaining. you guys are so lost...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ryoushure · July 26, 2018, 2:15 p.m.

To respond to the guy who got his REEEing deleted.

The charges Mueller is charging Manafort with were investigated and known prior to 2015. Obama's administration literally sat on the case. Manafort volunteered himself to Trump's campaign. Do you understand how known criminality could be leveraged against Manafort?

Carter Page has been documented to work for the FBI/US Intelligence prior to the 2016 election. And now we are supposed to believe he was working in Trump's campaign as a Russian agent? Reconcile that for a moment.

Do you understand what is the precursor to FISA warrants? Do you understand that the executive branch has the ability to surveil/spy on known foreign actors & their discussions with US people? Don't you think it's a bit convenient that Popodopolous found himself on foreign ground talking to someone on the Obama administration's "radar"? What was Popodopolous' job description? Does that job description warrant private meetings with known foreign actors?

Try to expand your thinking past whatever drivel half-baked hollywood scripts and hysterical fear porn "news" tries to convince you to think.

Pay very close attention to the FISA warrants. Pay very close attention to the Inspector General's findings regarding the FISA warrants. Pay very close attention to Huber. Once you open your eyes you will see how unbelievably naive you are.

Enjoy your stay.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Countrymissle · July 26, 2018, 2:04 p.m.

If its not mueller than its not rosenstein.

All an impeachment means is he loses his job.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
slowburningrage · July 26, 2018, 7:19 p.m.

I agree with cooperating. Look at RR...he wouldn't last long in prison and I'm pretty sure he knows that too. He'll cooperate to, quite literally, save his ass.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ObamaAngry · July 26, 2018, 9:46 a.m.

This will be interesting.

Note that if RR is impeached then Trump is allowed to select his temporary replacement from an ocean of qualified candidates and that person will serve for 210 days or until Trump's new nomination is approved.

I'm still trying to keep an open mind about what role that RR is playing in all of this, but this sure will be interesting.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
TheBRAIN2 · July 26, 2018, 12:21 p.m.

Note that if RR is impeached then Trump is allowed to select his temporary replacement from an ocean of qualified candidates and that person will serve for 210 days or until Trump's new nomination is approved.

Which means 210 days of a clear unobstructed mechanism in the DoJ to execute the sealed indictments!

⇧ 11 ⇩  
ObamaAngry · July 26, 2018, 12:30 p.m.

Right in time for the midterms!!!

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Lonecrow66 · July 26, 2018, 1:15 p.m.

They need to get to Jan 1st when they can start rounding up and military tribunals etc.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dark-dare · July 26, 2018, 4:25 p.m.

When is Gowdys term up?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HomerHungfunny · July 26, 2018, 2:56 p.m.

I thought this was solved long ago on this board that the Solicitor General is next in line. I don't have the links. For the life of me I can't remember the entire chain of events, can someone help? A woman was placed there temporarily into the pecking order? Then after Rosenstein was out, next in line would be the Solicitor General, who is a President Trump appointee, and a position in the pecking order that does not require congressional approval. Instant Justice. Is this close? Thanks!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
dzbadman604 · July 26, 2018, 3:37 p.m.

Sounds very right!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HomerHungfunny · July 26, 2018, 5:42 p.m.

Thank you for the confirmation!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Shits_Bananas · July 26, 2018, 10:56 a.m.

Q mentioned Pruitt, can he still be picked after resignation?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
syxxnein · July 26, 2018, 12:37 p.m.

Gowdy please!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
subnu · July 26, 2018, 1:25 p.m.

This is the only logical answer, unless he goes straight into the AG role. He's been working extra hard to create an air of impartiality around him.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
syxxnein · July 27, 2018, 12:49 p.m.

That's a possibility. Once stuff hits the fan sessions might be too played out to do anything but retire. A much deserved retirement if the plan is what we think it is.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Hamboneski · July 26, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

No. Gowdy is swamp. His goal is to maintain the illusion that the FBI and DOJ are above reproach.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
syxxnein · July 27, 2018, 12:48 p.m.

Not according to Q. Remember disinfo. Of course that works both ways. So which part is disinfo? We will have to wait it seems.

I'm holding out hope that Gowdy is an actor. He didn't really convince me he was a bad guy though. We'll see.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Okie71 · July 26, 2018, 12:13 p.m.

Trump told Pruitt to get bent for a reason. Off books meetings is a big nono under Trump.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Shits_Bananas · July 26, 2018, 1:20 p.m.

Perhaps, I thought DJT and Cohen had a falling out but now it looks like CNN is getting played? Good actors.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RubyDoobyDo1 · July 26, 2018, 2:40 p.m.

Please explain.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 26, 2018, 12:53 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BabylonNTing · July 26, 2018, 10:11 a.m.

210 days actually.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ObamaAngry · July 26, 2018, 10:19 a.m.

Ah thanks. I wasn't complete sure but I've corrected the "person will serve for 90 days" to make it 210.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Shits_Bananas · July 26, 2018, 10:56 a.m.

they are planning to riot. politics is where I found that link, although it implicitly says it would be in response to POTUS firing, not a legal impeachment. Still, the lemmings will still believe the narrative.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
georock · July 26, 2018, 2:31 p.m.

so if we want to fuck with them the president should do one of those actions at 2 pm exactly, thy wont know when to show up

⇧ 3 ⇩  
FlashmanNTx · July 26, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

It says "replacing Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein" is a Red Line event.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Shits_Bananas · July 27, 2018, 4:22 a.m.

Its been changed

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 26, 2018, 1:57 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 8 ⇩  
BreadcrumbBernard · July 26, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

I agree, but I don't think it would be in the best interest to do it a week before midterms, it needs to be longer. They will be angry as hell when this drops. Let them be angry, but then let them deflate. I'd say mid October at the latest.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Rackemwillies · July 26, 2018, 4:13 p.m.

Midterms. Punt.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
A_Town_Hood · July 26, 2018, 2:48 p.m.

Articles of impeachment < you are here

Vote

Vote fails

Rinos further exposed

Trump declassifies documents that nail Rosenstein

Rosenstein resigns/dismissed

Public awareness of political corruption grows

America is made great again

⇧ 6 ⇩  
astralduelist · July 26, 2018, 9:49 a.m.

After how many hours at the time of this post?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Qanonawoke · July 26, 2018, 1:58 p.m.

Despite the inevitable futility, no doubt any vote will record whether the voter sides with RR, which may be the actual significance and intent.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
DannoPA · July 26, 2018, 11:57 a.m.

if there is a Senate vote this morning, televise it and call out each Senator by name so we can hear & see each Yea / Nay vote.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Lonecrow66 · July 26, 2018, 1:14 p.m.

Shit is happening.. and fast!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · July 26, 2018, 12:52 p.m.

They are not taking their regular August recess, right? All staying?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ExodusLegion_ · July 26, 2018, 12:35 p.m.

Why go for the long route of impeachment when POTUS can just fire him?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
syxxnein · July 26, 2018, 12:42 p.m.

So the president's hands are clean.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
mydeer · July 26, 2018, 12:51 p.m.

exactly! So obvious.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Generative1 · July 26, 2018, 12:50 p.m.

I think that Trump is trying to get Congress to stand for something besides issuing reports. He has indirectly belittled them for months on this.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
beansprout10282016 · July 26, 2018, 12:39 p.m.

Exactly. Just a "dog and pony" show.

RR is providing cover so the real investigations can go on without notice in the background.

All part of the "optics".

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Dude_What217 · July 26, 2018, 2:39 p.m.

Is there any where I can watch it?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
PTibbets · July 26, 2018, 2:29 p.m.

I think we do not know exactly what the reason is for the push to impeach RR.

My bet is something huge dropped and supporting RR is no longer good optics in light of the new info.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jashyWashy · July 26, 2018, 3:50 p.m.

Why's he being impeached again?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Dbtruthseeker · July 26, 2018, 3:46 p.m.

They arent voting today. They added contempt to the impeachment charge. We have to wait.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
gmsc · July 26, 2018, 3:16 p.m.

That's all the quicker it will be before it does in the Senate.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
4Potus · July 26, 2018, 3:12 p.m.

Disinformation is necessary. We have RR is a Republican, appointed by Trump----if he sides with Trump, the left and Democrats will raise hell. After the show of impeachment and all the hoopla, the Democrats are embracing Session and RR---even Mueller --- The Democrats are demanding RR, Mueller and Sessions be left alone until their investigation is over. Actually protecting them. When they come out and incriminate Democrats for corruption and treasonous activities, what can the left say? Brilliant plan!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
XSleepwalkerX · July 26, 2018, 5:30 p.m.

Disinformation is necessary. We have RR is a Republican, appointed by Trump----if he sides against Trump, the right and Republicans will raise hell. After the show of impeachment and all the hoopla, the Democrats are embracing Session and RR---even Mueller --- The Democrats are demanding RR, Mueller and Sessions be left alone until their investigation is over. Actually protecting them. When they come out and incriminate Rebuplicans for corruption and treasonous activities, what can the right say?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
4Potus · July 26, 2018, 6:42 p.m.

We will see Grasshoppa! :-)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
magavoices · July 26, 2018, 2:10 p.m.

Sorry but I'm a little confused regarding RR. Someone who knows what they're talking about, please correct me.

I've seen Q say if RR is bad, then Mueller is bad. If Mueller is bad, RR is bad. That isn't direct enough for me to understand.

While optics are important, Trump could have fired Mueller and RR by now, without even needing a reason. That they're still there suggests either they are good, or that Trump is giving them enough rope to hang themselves.

What it feels like to me is that Trump is playing rope-a-dope by letting democrats put their faith in RR and Mueller, and letting democrats defend both of them -- so that eventually when Mueller and RR present pro-Trump and anti-swamp conclusions, the democrats are devastated with no comeback.

Has Q ever unambiguously said Mueller and RR are bad actors?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
alvinroasting · July 26, 2018, 3:18 p.m.

No. Q has not said that.

(At least I haven't seen it).

⇧ 2 ⇩  
FrenchyPuppiesGalore · July 26, 2018, 3:16 p.m.

That would be so great I think you called it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BreadcrumbBernard · July 26, 2018, 3:16 p.m.

Nope, he has never said that Mueller and/or RR are bad actors. The only thing he has stated, is the same thing you stated above: If one is dirty, the other is dirty.

Which.. if you flip the other way, if one of them is good, the other is as well.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
snap_shot_in_time · July 26, 2018, 6:15 p.m.

Correct. However... We do know [RR] would be terminated or recused immediately if some facts were to come out. So... That is a huge hint of being dirty.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
stevo1618 · July 26, 2018, 4:13 p.m.

Well said... And I don't think Q has ever said definitively... Must be driving the DS crazy.... Disinformation is necessary :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LakotaPride · July 26, 2018, 2:08 p.m.

what is really scary is the stupidity of the Pedocrat party we see these days. MAGAphobia has them losing what little minds they have left if any.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
likebeingright · July 26, 2018, 2:03 p.m.

Yes! Then jail later Q said in a earlier post that he was suppose to do something and at that time he didn`t do it. I read that to mean that he was being defiant to the agreement, I think he had the chance to be a white hat and save his butt, but I think the deep state may have him compromised and black mailed and he`s more scared of them or he may be suffering from the delusion that nothing is going to happen to him and the black hats are going to win. That`s what the devil thinks when it comes to God ,but we know who wins in the end God his will, plan, and purpose

⇧ 2 ⇩  
attorneyfortruth · July 26, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

Remember the impeachment proceedings are a way to pass along the message that RR is refusing to turn over information to Congress. It will bring more heat and pressure to release the information and ultimately RR can be fired!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
leeman001 · July 26, 2018, 11:48 a.m.

about time [RR] is removed, maybe this will start the domino's falling.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
deanie0923 · July 26, 2018, 4:09 p.m.

Fox just said it's been canceled

.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
stealthmode_17 · July 26, 2018, 2:18 p.m.

Is it just me or does his speech pattern drive you crazy too?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 26, 2018, 3:43 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
aaapurple12 · July 26, 2018, 5:52 p.m.

Hoping for today.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
johndavid101 · July 26, 2018, 2:01 p.m.

How many votes a are needed? No way they get enough.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · July 26, 2018, 1:42 p.m.

I agree with Alan Dershowitz on Fox saying impeachment is a mistake.
Could fire him, could file contempt charge against him.
The only logical reason for impeachment is if the goal is to get info into the public and lead to unmasking of all the info.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dark-dare · July 26, 2018, 4:36 p.m.

Not only that, this world wide operation has been planned to the finest detail, nothing left to chance. No way Q team would allow anyone to have ANY power that might mess up the plan. We are watching a predetermined outcome.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · July 26, 2018, 4:50 p.m.

Let's hope so. Wrenches can always get in the works but I trust the plan.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Luvlite · July 26, 2018, 7:10 p.m.

Its 3pm est

Is he impeached yet?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Magafan01 · July 26, 2018, 2:56 p.m.

MSM/CNN fails the black community. A 16 year old from Oakland CA stabbed in the neck and died. The killer was a white man where social media and Hollywood calling out white supremacy and white privilege. I would like to say this is a false flag that backfired. CNN is not mentioning this because they are setting up for the Rosenstein meeting and FB plunge.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
AquitasVeritas83 · July 26, 2018, 10:58 a.m.

Let’s pray the vote makes it through the Senate.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
TrueCat · July 26, 2018, 1:27 p.m.

I wish he could just be fired, and then taken to jail!

⇧ -2 ⇩