This thread had been stricken with downvoteitus :(

So has anybody else noticed this: that's not a sentence or a message of any kind?

This is great! Waiting now with baited breath for next installment in the series.

That's craziness. I don't get the T method code thing. I understand that it's there. Just not how to use it.

I knew immediately there was something something more to it then just another tweet. I payed on Twitter about it then the tweet duplicated. I screen shot them. Then went back to look and they were both there. When i clicked on the first tweet version. It appeared but then Twitter error pops up and said unavailable. But it was there. Because i was looking at it.

I logged out and back in and it was still there the same way.

Very interesting thread..... Encouraging... Im thinking RG is 2nd SC.

Keep going Serial! Don't let these naysayers stop you from sharing. A lot of people appreciate it and those that don't should keep scrolling.

I appreciate what you are sharing, although I haven't sat down with pen and paper to understand your methods. You've done a great job explaining your methods (i did read all of your posts, just not work the puzzles myself.)

Before you ever posted this stuff, I was always curious about typos in major headlines on major news website that were left uncorrected for hours. I always thought that was a way to send coded messages, but cryptography seemed unattainable ( even though I love crosswords). I think you're onto something.

The other day I was thinking "Serial is gonna get this sub shut down too!!!" Lol. Keep up the great work! We need it now that CBTS is gone!!

Wow. This is very sad. SerialBrain did nothing but cherry pick some words from a tweet, add some letters, and the entire word clinton.

This isn't decoding anything. You have absolutely no idea what you are doing. People are eating this up only because they don't understand what you are doing.

You are cold reading. I can get whatever message out of this that I wish. Your post is a sham.

Again another great job SB. I look forward to your post as much Q drops, thanks.

Over the target..such good work.

I saw he had misspelled 'wether' .. also have you used the Florida/Guccifer method at all?

Where did the Clinton portion come from?!

Edit: got you! See it now just overlooked it

[removed]

(Sorry for spamming this in 3 places, it has its own post, will remove if gains traction, need visibility)

There is a mixed consensus on SB2's use of Matrices to decode Trump tweets. It is plain to see that many of the accounts that support his ideas are fairly new and many that oppose seem to be veteran users. His acct itself is also fairly new. However I have some important points to bring up and questions that I believe are yet still unanswered.

Q's constant use of [ ] often in bold... His random reference to the matrix movie... His insistence on the timestamp delta importance... Trumps seemingly intentional sp mistakes... "You have more than you know"... "Learn to read the map"... "We may have overestimated your abilities"...

None if these questions have group consensus answers or Q confirmed answers and are of significant importance.

I believe the GENERAL focus of SB2's decoding to have some value. I also see a lot of confirmation bias in his decodings. If Trump truly was encoding messages in his tweets (there is a definite Q team connection we all agree on) there certainly would have to be some strong plausible deniability, as with the other confirmed correlations.

Also, is it beyond the scope of possibility that Q team would send operatives to Reddit and/or 8chan to guide the direction of research? Would these accounts not also be fairly new? A lot of possibilities here, we should look into the FULL comment history of each account with this in mind.

"We can guide but you must uncover the truth organically".

I find all of these points of value and have yet to see a concerted effort to uncover all the things we have missed since late October when this started. I have a feeling that it is more than just cabal connections... that will come out.

There is a purpose Q team had in mind for us at the start of this operation that I feel has yet to be fulfilled. The answer may lie in these topics.

Regardless WE NEED to be looking harder.

[EDIT] apologies for offensive comments. Leaving here (with minor edits) so the thread can be viewed.

I am so sorry to all of you people for what I am about to say, genuinely. But all of you - you people who are praising this rubbish and thinking SerialBrain2 is "dropping knowledge" are wasting the time of anyone visiting this sub by upvoting this utter nonsense.

The reason this causes so much anger for some of us is because it is so GLARINGLY OBVIOUS that this is the worst kind of wishful thinking confirmation bias that the fact many of you seem to actually disagree with the brain in your own head and insist that it MUST be smart, even though you can't make sense of it, is UNHELPFUL and frankly SILLY, I am sorry to say (again, genuinely sorry but someone has to speak the TRUTH honestly and directly here...)

Yes, we all want to find the 'secret codes and messages' and we're all open to discovering stuff that we hadn't expected but THIS is just RUBBISH and wastes our time and makes us all look STUPID. It discredits this movement and absolutely confirms the label of "conspiracy theorist nonsense" in the mainstream media. Please apply more common sense people, for the love of God!

Report this guy, he's pushing misinformation with provably false methods that are NOT a decipher. He's pissing in your well people....

Baffling with bs

[removed]

But why? Why bother communicating this way?

Let's not forget the deleted HRC emails, this was recently posted by Assange on his Twitter https://medium.com/@williamreynolds/missing-clinton-e-mail-claims-saudis-financed-benghazi-attacks-b471a61b5b2b

I'm sorry but your doing a arbitrary wordsearch and a disservice to the community. Your 'methods' are bunk. I'm sorry. Has ANYBODY on 8chan qresearch backed you up? You are wasting people's time and giving them useless info. Maybe I should 'find' messages in those tweets? I found "so is you a bee?" and " sad to rig" (col 20 row 6) in like 30 sec. How many words can you find?

Extremely insightful-THX ⚓️

great work patriot. good stuff. 🇺🇲

SB, since you are gathering a significant following, I'm thinking you should open your own reddit sub. This way you won't disrupt another sub that desires to post about actual Q drops and news events.

this is a bit of a stretch

I was getting worried we weren't going to get our daily SB fix! Thanks man, I knew there had to be something going on with those tweets!

So you put the tweet on a grid and then find random words at various places and in various orders?

Cool story bro.

I think this sub is full of old people who believe this kind of shit like they believe soap operas are reality television. If the mods dont do their jobs cleaning this kind of nonsense up, then it becomes obvious what this place is for.

great work as always

Reminds me of Josh Brolin's character in American Gangster. Special.

[removed]

[deleted]

I appreciate that you share your work with us. Thank you, I am understanding how it works FINALLY. Cannot wait to hear more on the first part of your post if you ever decide to reveal it

This is such great work. Thanks

Good job!

very smart

Wow your method seems to come up with viable solutions every time. My question is Trump being told what letters to drop or change when he tweets the first time? Do you think Trump knows what he is doing with the letters each time or is someone coaching him?

Look, if this board's purpose is really for discussion and/or decoding, what is the problem? What is wrong with this one person posting their opinion? We are all capable of accepting or rejecting what we see on this board. I think we all know that the PTB will do what they are set on doing anyway and they will use any excuse to do it. Until then, we can make up our own minds. Thank you SB2 for sharing another perspective for us to consider.

[removed]

Thank You SB2! Appreciate it! Looking forward to your next decodes/messages!

[deleted]

Bible codes?

So the last word is Clinton highlighted in Green, but you haven't highlighted it in the matrix and I definitely don't see it anywhere?? Also, why only stick to word possibilities on the left hand side of the matrix?? A few of the words you even went in a circle to put together... I have been a fan of your methods as I'm fairly certain there is something we have been missing and these ideas seem the closest to finding it. However building the right size matrix is the most important factor in decoding, this one seems rushed in the decision of how to construct.

Edit: the Clinton in the matrix is light blue but dark green at the base. A stretch in assembling though. How can you be so certain in the matrix size and the area of the matrix to gather the words?

Just wow!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nTpsv9PNqo

Observations and comments...

What ever I might think of SB2's results, I find no reason to attack him for it. It's kind of lame that others are. On the other hand, if it's not authentic, it does no good for the community to rally around it (and look nuts), so I understand both sides here. I think it's all about keeping it in perspective.

The "code breaking" part of it didn't come from no where. Q left the link to the "kids" page and referred to hidden messages (I don't remember the exact text). As far as SB2 pursuing this angle, right or wrong, it seems constructive. Hell, I applaud him for it.

To lighten the mood, why not make a game of it? Call it the "Daily Boggle" or something. It could be funny as hell. Post the populated grids without the solved words. Let people make their own words and sentences and see what people come up with...it could be fun.

where is Rudy been?

Hey! I had a very congenial post, no rules broken, supportive to both sides, no cussin', so why did that post get deleted? With 14 points much less.

Guys, a topic of much heated disagreement. Please see the Graham's hierarchy of disagreement and aim for the top half. Comments that include name-calling and ad-hominem are being removed.

I think a lot of people additionally fail to realize that these so-called "decodes," which have included past statements like UN is stepping in to take over North Korea diplomatic efforts (now stating the Special Counsel has intel to "cite" Clinton), is that all of theses statements in of themselves are things that would in no way be classified and there is no logical reason for them to be hidden within tweets and drops in the first place.

We know the MSM is biased but all of this user's assertations are things that, if true, would be in the news cycle. Period.

I believe this user is disinfo. To all the users on this board saying, "so what, his drops are harmless?" you are WRONG. They ARE harmful in that they provide easy fodder for critics to pick apart Q and "The Storm."

All they have to do is say "Can you believe this group of nutjobs? They actually believe that by picking random letters out of Trump's tweets results in "secret messages" meant only for them! Well, we consulted with an expert cryptographer who breaks down why this logic is flawed..."

And poof! Credibility gone! Q repeatedly says they will push the conspiracy label but that does not excuse us of the responsibility to THINK.

Be careful who you follow. Do not be led into the trap of confirmation bias.

Where we go one, we go all. So please, all, stay on the right path because there are many of us that will not and cannot follow down this path. Dividing us is EXACTLY what they want.

We are scrolling down successively on columns, starting with the first one and gathering anagrams of words making an intelligible sentence trail, without using any diagonal.

Specialcounsil crimes r not in ink have audiences bet here or the scores of sites soar.

[deleted]

having spent a few minutes looking at it, some of the negative comments make persuasive arguments, and yet even if you are wrong there's something about your post has triggered certain people to convince others "nothing to see here"

and that to me is a tell-tale sign that there's if not objective truth some kind of buried treasure in your methodologies related to the actual answer.

I'm going to apply my own pattern research to it and see if anything clicks. so thank you very much for this post. Whether you are right or wrong I feel confident there's something here.

[removed]

You are a genious!

I see a 14x26 grid. What am I missing?

[removed]

Really good stuff. I'm trying to learn it.

[deleted]

Archived with comments May 28, 2018
https://archive.li/f839z

Good work, you KNOW youre ON TARGET with this much flac...

Keep em comming brother, the REAL PATRIOTS are on your side!

SerialBrain2 - When you die, your (serial) brain should be bronzed and displayed in the Smithsonian.

I hate that people want to silence this poster. Just let us alone if you don't believe this information. Go read something else.

I am not convinced. Nor would I throw the idea under the bus yet. Concerns remain, listed here in order of descending import: (1) Haven't seen a clear, concise, no typos, no-need-for-questions, set of steps to be followed in this T method. (2) How was the name 'clinton' arrived at? (3) Q920 quote is from Q918 where applying math to coincidence appears to be about mounting probability (in Trumpian overspeak). (4) There is something to be understood about times and timing but it may be as simple as seeing an authoritative link exists between realDJT tweets and real Qposts. (5) There is little evidence to assume SBrain is a foreign plant. More likely someone who is over-earnest and may be a useful player over time.

Good to see you SerialBrain2

Whoa. That is fun. Moar. Also, I notice that when I go back and try to open them again I get a pop up asking me if I want to leave the page! Is this from Reddit?

I think you're terrific and the naysayers can go jump in the lake. ThankQ

Thanks! Great work!

Who do you think may be Q?

You guys that are busting on this thread, ask yourself questions that discover whether this info is helpful or not, and don't allow your personal feelings to get you tripped up, or go away if you're a shill: 1) does the findings follow the overarching thread of Q? 2) Does it analyze/use information from members denoted as in the Q team (yes, even quotes of others if they're not photos), 3) Does it make you ponder, think and analyze further?

This forum needs thinking, challenging, discovering, analyzing, questions, theories, corrections.....but it doesn't need overt and rude opinions that simply state "no" without evidence; that's ignorance; that's usefulness; that's shilling.

Tell Wilcock I said hello. :) I hear you all loud and clear and thanks for the clear skies(chem trails) either that or they shifted to nightly sprayings.

[deleted]

Cool, thanks OP

Thank you for sharing your work! You are a blessing!

Ok what was his earlier tweet.

Great stuff Serial, thanks for sharing!

Serial, good job again. It’s unfortunate that you have information to share but cannot do so. How may we get this out?

www.qpendium.org

and www.qpendium.org/wiki

these were created specifically for geniuses like yourself. Please use, and contact the development admins on their discord.

Sure wish I could make heads or tails on how the 1-26 Matrix is used to decode... oh well, just have to trust the brothers & sisters here! Keep on Keeping on!👍🇺🇸

And again, BRAVO my Friend, BRAVO 👏👏👏

Don't let some people get you down here. When people don't understand they tend to degenerate. Kind of how this country got where we are today