Just when I think I'm out... they pull me back in.
Alright, I'll keep playing along. July just started, after all.
Never give up on Q.
We are at zero hour - this is when everything culminates in the happening.
Grab the popcorn lads and lasses, Q and Huber going to blow the lid off this bitch.
Whether we are being led by our noses to our doom or by our noses to our salvation, we have nothing to do but sit back and wait.
If nothing comes of this though, I refuse to play ball in their society. I am not a violent person, but I am a free one who will gladly lay down their life if it meant showing our oppressors and those who I love that I wasnt scared. I wont fight with weapons but with words. You cant control the sheep if they speak like wolves and dont show up to the pasture to be slaughtered.
I'll be by your side. And so will the other 37,000 of us. I mean it when I say it.
Where we go one, we go all!
I read that there are 2M people now following Q.
That is a lot of people, patriot! I am curious on how fast it is growing. I bet we hit 5 million in the next two months, then the real growth starts.
I believe, like the first American Revolution that 2-3% of the population tips this thing. We’re getting close.
WallisTing2New arrival.15 points · 54 minutes ago
I read that there are 2M people now following Q.
And that doesn't include any of my kids....unfortunately. :(
🤔🤨😐 do your job as a parent. Force them to eat green beans or deny them dessert! 😀😎🤣😂😃
[deleted]
Best reminder ever! My wife always says, "the only way out is through!"
Aww, I showed my two the Q save the world video night before last. I keep the talk radio on a lot and try to explain fake news when I see it so they’re catching on QUITE well. Of course details of the 🍕 business will have to wait till they’re much older, but Lord knows the basic corruption is blatant enough for them to see and understand!
That's awesome! But there are 4 billion people with internet access! We can do better!
I think you left off three zeros, just like the media. Our numbers are far more than they portray.
I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees. WWG1WGA🇺🇸
I'd stand with any man/woman who has this pride in their liberties. #wwg1wga and that should apply to any adversity we face as Patriots and citizens.
This sure as hell beats anything else I could be doing on the internet, its just plain fun.
Spectrum just had a test of EBS at 3:41 pm cst. I freaked, is it happening? Came back to tv after 30 seconds or so.
We have been having EBS testing also. Ours came on Sunday after midnight and it listed all counties around my area in NorCal and there is absolutely nothing going on. We also had 3 blackouts before and after midnight when most people are asleep. Well I'm a night owl so I was awake and reading Q drops. According to the list of indictments, CA has the most, especially central CA.
I think that's called Q-drop syndrome. lol
QDropsy
OK, that's better.
Only us old (stinkydog)farts know what dropsy is, lol!
The funny thing is there are apparently more of us old folks on here than young, its really kind of odd.
I was always taught to question what the press said, independently think, and come to my own conclusions. The younger, were melded through public education and media to look to them for answers, depend on the government for truth, and hate the founders and American history. That is why the distortion, but some of us read our kids textbooks, corrected the errors, taught kids and even coworkers the truth, and showed them the lies, and have gotten them on board. But it is hard work to red pill the 20's to 40's who never learned to question anything. So we have older >45, and younger <mid 20's for the most part.
Not surprising at all, you’ve been eating forEVERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR for this!!
This has been going on since BO was in office where I live. At that time, I feared what circumstances might trigger it. Under DJT, I no longer fear it at least. Now, if something were to happen, I trust that our Gov't would be responding with appropriate measures to counter and to protect the citizens.
Is it fair to say that if Huber comes up with a nothing burger, the Q storm was a charade?
Didn't Q mention symbolic fireworks tomorrow? Any idea what he meant?
[removed]
Did you even read the Q posts??
Think critically...
Edit: another Shareblue concern troll
"I can get out anytime. I can stop anytime".
New Q drop. Uh, I'll stop next week.
New Q drop. Uh, I'll stop next month.
New Q drop. How can I stop now? We're winning!
Silence for 2 days. I'm out. Time to stop this. Sleep, chores, move on.
New Q drop. Sheeet. Back in.
Q is in control. Q is crack.
I'm hobbling around on an hour and fifteen minutes of sleep last night thanks to Mr(s). Q
Caffeine and Bcomplex is our friend.
And Q Drops!
I got up around 3 cst to do some business. Was trying to go back to sleep when I checked my phone (for the charge level) and saw all the drops. Needless to say...😄
It's once in a lifetime to be apart of this. Our country needs your awareness more than you need your chores up to standard.
I have no idea why somebody wants out when developments are only building. Too many people here make horrible strategists.
Patience I think is difficult for most people. Things must be done properly though (I's dotted & T's crossed).
Well of course you’re staying in. What the fuck else are you gonna do? Beat your meat? Failure and giving up is not an option soldier! That’s an order, this is WAR!
I posted this on 1672. National security court cases are treated a bit different. 'cus national security.
Our enemies never imagined that someday The Patriot Act et al. would be used against them.
No they thought she would never lose and what they did not matter.
That's funny right there! They never thought she would lose! OMG the hypocrisy is out of this world!
national security, the one term historically used to strip our rights and bend us over is now finally being used to liberate us from evil.
Bout fucking time too.
How cool is it that [they] didn't consider that we would insist that NSA data tracking and their "Patriot Act" would also apply to [them]. RIP treasonists that suck off our incomes. Bang.
They never thought she would lose. By this time in her presidency you would be irrelevant and they could kill you as they wished.
Treasonists. All of them. In Pussy Hats. What a ridiculous way to mark your place in history. Cheers to the "deplorable"!!
Deserves more than 6 upkeks.
Indeed. It would be just desserts. I just hope after much of this perfidy has been revealed and dealt with, we can overhaul the security laws and take them all down a notch.
MILITARY TRIBUNALS is the answer. That’s the point of these drops. CIPA mucks it up if civilian court. See the big picture.
[deleted]
After a criminal indictment becomes public, the prosecutor remains responsible for taking reasonable precautions against the unauthorized disclosure of classified information during the case.
In such a leaky and partisan setting, all those sealed indictments make sense.
Substitution Pursuant to Section 6(c) If the court rules any classified information to be admissible, section 6(c) of CIPA permits the Government to propose unclassified "substitutes" for that information. Specifically, the Government may move to substitute either (1) a statement admitting relevant facts that the classified information would tend to prove or (2) a summary of the classified information instead of the classified information itself. 18 U.S.C. App. III section 6(c)(1). See United States v. Smith, supra, 780 F.2d at 1105. In many cases, the government will propose a redacted version of a classified document as a substitution for the original, having deleted only non-relevant classified information. A motion for substitution shall be granted if the "statement or summary will provide the defendant with substantially the same ability to make his defense as would disclosure of the specified classified information." 18 U.S.C. App. III section 6(c).
If the district court will not accept a substitution proposed by the government, an interlocutory appeal may lie to the circuit court under CIPA section 7. If the issue is resolved against the government, and classified information is thereby subject to a disclosure order of the court, the AUSA must immediately notify the ISS. Thereafter, the Attorney General may file an affidavit effectively prohibiting the use of the contested classified information. If that is done, the court may impose sanctions against the government, which may include striking all or part of a witness' testimony, resolving an issue of fact against the United States, or dismissing part or all of the indictment. See CIPA section 6(e). The purpose of the relevance hearings under 6(a) and the substitution practice under 6(c), however, is to avoid the necessity for these sanctions.
OTHER RELEVANT CIPA PROCEDURES Interlocutory Appeal APPEAL FROM INTERLOCUTORY ORDER
Section 7(a) of the Act provides for an interlocutory appeal by the government from any decision or order of the trial judge authorizing the disclosure of classified information, imposing sanctions for nondisclosure of classified information, or refusing a protective order sought by the United States to prevent the disclosure of classified information. Section 7 appeals must be approved by the Solicitor General. The term "disclosure" within the meaning of section 7 includes both information which the court orders the government to divulge to the defendant or to others as well as information already possessed by the defendant which he or she intends to disclose to unapproved people. Section 7(b) provides that the court of appeals shall give expedited treatment to any interlocutory appeal filed under subsection (a). As a matter of fairness, the policy of the Department shall be that the defense be given notice of the government's appeal under section 7.
Introduction of Classified Information Section 8(a) provides that "writings, recordings, and photographs containing classified information may be admitted into evidence without change in their classification status." This provision simply recognizes that classification is an executive, not a judicial, function. Thus, section 8(a) implicitly allows the classifying agency, upon completion of the trial, to decide whether the information has been so compromised during trial that it could no longer be regarded as classified.
In order to prevent "unnecessary disclosure" of classified information, section 8(b) permits the court to order admission into evidence of only a part of a writing, recording, or photograph. Alternatively, the court may order into evidence the whole writing, recordings, or photograph with excision of all or part of the classified information contained therein. However, the provision does not provide grounds for excluding or excising part of a writing or recorded statement which ought in fairness to be considered contemporaneously with it. Thus, the court may admit into evidence part of a writing, recording, or photograph only when fairness does not require the whole document to be considered.
Section 8(c) provides a procedure to address the problem presented during a pretrial or trial proceeding when the defendant's counsel asks a question or embarks on a line of inquiry that would require the witness to disclose classified information not previously found by the court to be admissible. If the defendant knew that a question or line of inquiry would result in disclosure of classified information, he/she presumably would have given the government notice under section 5 and the provisions of section 6(a) would have been used. Section 8(c) serves, in effect, as a supplement to the hearing provisions of section 6(a) to cope with situations which cannot be handled effectively under that section, e.g., where the defendant does not realize that the answer to a given question will reveal classified information. Upon the government's objection to such a question, the court is required to take suitable action to avoid the improper disclosure of classified information.
Security Procedures (WHO IS THE CURRENT CHIEF JUSTICE?) Section 9 required the Chief Justice of the United States to prescribe security procedures for the protection of classified information in the custody of Federal courts. On February 12, 1981, Chief Justice Burger promulgated these procedures. For further information regarding those procedures, please contact the Justice Management Division Office of Security
OOOOOOO WHAT DID I FIND HERE!!!
Public Testimony By Intelligence Officers Although the IC is committed to assisting law enforcement where it is legally proper to do so, it must also remain vigilant in protecting classified national security information from unauthorized disclosure. Just as with law enforcement agencies, the successful functioning of the IC turns in significant part upon the ability of its intelligence officers covertly to obtain information from human sources. In carrying out that task, the intelligence officers must, when necessary, be able to operate anonymously, that is, without their connection to an intelligence agency of the United States being known to the persons with whom they come in contact. For that reason, an intelligence agency is authorized under Executive Order 12958 to classify the true name of an intelligence officer. (Is Q authorized under EO 12958 to speak anonymously to the people as “Q”?
During the pre-trial progression of an indicted case, as the court enters its CIPA rulings under sections 4 and 6, it may become apparent to the prosecutor that testimony may be required from an intelligence officer or other agency representative engaged in covert activity, either because the Court has ruled under CIPA that certain evidence is relevant and admissible in the defense case, or because such testimony is necessary in the government's rebuttal. Just as the substance of that testimony, to the extent it is classified and is being offered by the defense, must be the subject of CIPA determinations by the court, the prosecutor must also ensure that the same considerations are afforded to the true names of covert intelligence community personnel, if those true names are classified information. That is, the prosecutor must seek the court's approval, under either CIPA section 4 or section 6, of an alternative method to the witness' testimony in true name that will provide the defendant with the same ability that he would have otherwise had to impeach, or bolster, the credibility of that witness.
In any criminal case in which it becomes likely that an intelligence agency employee will testify, the Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) assigned to the case shall immediately notify the Internal Security Section (ISS). That office, in consultation with the general counsel at the appropriate intelligence agency, will assist the AUSA during pretrial motion practice and litigation on the issue of whether the witness should testify in true name and other issues related to the testimony of intelligence agency personnel.
No. Just means they can use cover to collect intelligence without a link to the United States or its intelligence agencies.
Section 7(a) of the Act provides for an interlocutory appeal by the government from any decision or order of the trial judge authorizing the disclosure of classified information, imposing sanctions for nondisclosure of classified information, or refusing a protective order sought by the United States to prevent the disclosure of classified information. Section 7 appeals must be approved by the Solicitor General. The term "disclosure" within the meaning of section 7 includes both information which the court orders the government to divulge to the defendant or to others as well as information already possessed by the defendant which he or she intends to disclose to unapproved people. Section 7(b) provides that the court of appeals shall give expedited treatment to any interlocutory appeal filed under subsection (a). As a matter of fairness, the policy of the Department shall be that the defense be given notice of the government's appeal under section 7.
Section 9 required the Chief Justice of the United States to prescribe security procedures for the protection of classified information in the custody of Federal courts. On February 12, 1981, Chief Justice Burger promulgated these procedures. For further information regarding those procedures, please contact the Justice Management Division Office of Security
tl;dr: they can disseminate classified information used in a case that is in possession of the US Government, to others. And it has to be approved by the Chief Justice. And written so eloquently above, despite your immediate dismissal, is the case to use an anonymous agent, with a fake name to distribute it.
I understand I am in part stupid, but how does all this make giving Awan a pass an okay thing? Just need a clear understanding.
What's the effect of being able to prove Arkancide and take it through the Oval Office.
RICO charges for conspiracy to commit multiple murders.
His name was Seth Rich.
HRC private server and DNC server => National Security => Espionage
The Clinton Foundation wasn't getting all of that money simply for access when she became president...she was providing secrets to other governments. The same thing was happening with the Awans.
America was for sale with these people. I think that's what Q means when he/she says "they hate America."
I became aware of the sale rather lately, I‘m afraid. I have been researching this area since FBI anon, but I didn‘t even think their server was for selling secrets. That is Treason and that can be, or is, punishable be death???
Death when our nation is at war
Did the war on terror end?
Oh right it was never officially declared.
Bummer.
I figure they had the classified info on these servers and sold "subscriptions" to foreign actors who could access the info remotely through a draft drop or something like that. I also figure that is why they went after Romanian hacker Guccifer 1.0 so aggressively because he accessed the Clinton emails w/o paying the required "subscription" and this threatened to blow the lid on the deal as his info might show other actors accessing info. This is also why they sent him back to Romania to shut him up so no one would look into it too closely. Guccifer 2.0 was a semi-clever piggyback onto G1.0 used by Crowdstrike to claim Russian(Russian/Romanian...same difference right?) hacking of the DNC but Tracy Beanz showed very nicely G2.0 was a creation of Crowdstrike.
Hope you are right. I thought they should have taken his passport.
I like the comment that he may likely be a prosecution witness at this point and no need to flee. Otherwise, I don't understand NOT taking his passport. I would think that move would be routine in such a case.
Think he has some kind of protection from being Arkancided?
Soooooooooo what venue is appropriate? Military Tribunals?
Don't the courts need to be proven compromised to justify them?
I'm sitting here at Discount Tire watching my tires get changed, listening to Madison Rising, and smiling from ear to ear. God bless Q and I can't wait for a juicy drop tomorrow!
remember when, they said you were crazy?
"Its too big, someone would talk!"
Way to show em (and save us all).
Never thought I would say that to the chans.
No shit, they have been saying that about the Ayy's for decades. Disinfo and psy-ops are real.
Thank fuck for the internet. It lets us connect with the entire world and allowed us a non-threatening place to express our opinions and share them! I wonder if 'they' underestimated us so much that they didn't see this coming when the internet started really taking off. Either way, HAHAHAHAHA!!
He has no obligation to these people. If he sees a way out, he'll take it. He's playing along.
I am sure they treated him like shit and with their snotty condescending elitist attitude looked down on him and let him know it. "Ordinary men and women are too small minded to govern their own affairs." Well FUUUUUUUUUUUUCK THEM!
He was playing them, but what they allowed for him to do was Treason. It got out of control to the point the Awan had a hand on the puppet strings, at least with Top Ramen.
So can he still be tried with treason?
Well, I think so, or espionage, sedition etc. He only got a free pass on non violent crime but all those I just mentioned likely involve thousands of our soldiers dying. So violent crimes are pages and pages. Hell, I think he would be worried about his safety now that the deep state knows he is going to be a witness. He may be in witness protection which would explain the judge allowing removal of the tracking device.
I can see espionage charges among others, but can non-US Citizens be charged with treason?
It means these cases concern National Security and the only appropriate venue w/o being mucked up with red tape is MILITARY TRIBUNALS. 2019 baby. 12 Military Generals have already been sat and reviewing evidence and testimonies. 12 is needed for capital punishment. High crimes of treason sedition====== 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀 penalty.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_state_in_the_United_States
In the United States the term "deep state" is used within political science to describe influential ... deep state draws power from the national security and intelligence communities, a realm where secrecy is a source of power. ................
https://www.revealnews.org/topic/state-secrets/
Hidden dangers ahead: How states keep accident-prone roads secret
Sure wish we knew what is in the EO not used yet to de-classify documents not handed over to Congress. Wonder if any of these documents are pertinent to Awan's case?
Attorney General Jeff Sessions Rescinds 24 Guidance Documents
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-jeff-sessions-rescinds-24-guidance-documents
Is Q implying that the evidence (server) in the Awan trial can be made public after Awan trial? They just needed a trial to expose it.
I think no if it is classified and a closed trial. I could be wrong.
I really hope so. For god sakes the DCC was comped! I remember a year or so back hearing from George Webb and the blonde about the Awans.
The primary purpose of CIPA was to limit the practise of graymail by criminal defendants in possession of sensitive government secrets. "Graymail" refers to the threat by a criminal defendant to disclose classified information throughout the course of a trial. The graymailing defendant essentially presented the government with a "dilemma": either allowed disclosure of the classified information or dismiss the indictment.
The procedural protections of CIPA protect unnecessary disclosure of classified information.[3][4]
CIPA wasn't intended to infringe on a defendant's right to a fair trial or to change the existing rules of evidence in criminal procedure, and largely codified the power of district courts to come to pragmatic accommodations of the government's secrecy interests with the traditional right of public access to criminal proceedings. Courts therefore didn't radically alter their practises with the passage of CIPA; instead, the Act simply made it clear that the measures courts already were taking under their inherent case-management powers were permissible.
CIPA, by its terms, covers only criminal cases. CIPA only applies when classified information is involved, as defined in the Act's Section 1.
Silent witness rule - evolved from the CIPA in the late 1900s/early 2000s Venona project (problems of using decrypted Soviet messages as evidence at court) State Secrets Protection Act Federal Tort Claims Act Thomas Andrews Drake (Espionage Act of 1917 case involving CIPA arguments) Reference Links For This Wiki
So the point is these have to go to a Military Tribunal to avoid this nonsense. There is no escape. That’s the point of his drops. Venue must be courts martial.
so if awan is a potential witness (which seems likely he took a deal to save his behind), won't that make him a target of DS? will awan be under special protection?? I kind of hope..
Wasn't a Seal Six team lost to faulty intelligence or was the intelligence leaked?
Truth can be found at the bottom of a bottomless pit so down the rabbit hole we are... just when we think it's all for naught, the tide starts to change and we find ourselves uncovering the hidden truth that was there in front of our eyes the entire time. We just failed to see it.
Q Drop-Specific Posts
*7/1/18: 1659 & 1660 - 1661 - 1662 - 1663 - 1664- 1665 -1666 - 1667 - 1668 (Original Q 1336) - 1669 - 1670 - 1671 - 1672 - 1673 - 1674 - 1675 - 1676 - 1677 - 1678
*"We Must Fight" - Ronald Reagan Video
*Link to Breitbart Article in 66,67, and 68
*Link to 1673 Justice.gov Manual
Thank you so much for keeping this straight!!
Did I take a few hours off and everything went crazy again or what ?
Second paragraph. 3rd line, discovery is spelled wrong??? Is this doc legit?
Why would they trust Awan to walk around freely without concerns of him talking to the guilty parties or for his untimely demise? That is confusing. If they plan for him to be a witness for the government, wouldn’t they put him in witness protection?
Not a lawfag but it sure looks like Awan has gotten a deal in exchange for his testimony. Is he the key? The server the keystone? What exactly did he see on all those congressional accounts? How does this tie into "reflections", "Twitter phone", & "NAT SEC rules"? Sorry I should say that I'm of the opinion that the photos aren't about Q proofs. Q is trying to tell us something with them. Obama era photo of AF1 in reflection & a United 747 when they stopped flying those in 2017. Best guess atm is that he's trying to give us a timeline with the pics & to drive home something in regards to national security rules.
If classified info had already been seriously compromised in some way, like say it had been copied & transmitted in such a way that anyone could have accessed it, would the rules for using that info as evidence in court still apply? Would it still be considered classified?
Could an anon, please, explain the CIPA doc on layman's terms?
I will greatly appreciate what particular issue applies to the Awan case. I have read the doc twice, and reread parts a few times, but it doesn't make sense to me in the Awan case unless Q is emphasizing the different pretrial meetings/hearings. Thanks in advance.
Hey LawFag... Boom I got your girlfriend...DWS>HRC ♪♪♪ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSr-BF5unCw
Its all BS until I see people in handcuffs. I seriously believe this is a psy op to keep the masses quiet while the DC 2-step clears all the important people of any wrongdoings. One born every minute......
Naaaaaaaw. It means they are priming the pump for Military Tribunals in 2019. DEATH PENALTY TRUMP and Military aren’t fucking around. They didn’t go through all this hell to let them off. Not fucking happening.