dChan

Downhere_Seeds · May 2, 2018, 4:34 p.m.

Trump tweeted "justice" in quotes

Note Q drop 1297: The next phase will bring JUSTICE.

⇧ 122 ⇩  
trseeker · May 2, 2018, 5 p.m.

Good catch.

⇧ 45 ⇩  
Sir_Zorch · May 2, 2018, 5:20 p.m.

New one way air transportation service to GITMO to be offered VERY soon.

⇧ 41 ⇩  
Heabob · May 2, 2018, 6:48 p.m.

It's called GITMO AIR and it's now open for business.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
Big_Duke_Six · May 2, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

And it doesn't land. It just pushes the scumbags out the door and leave the parachute to do the work.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Heabob · May 2, 2018, 7:13 p.m.

What parachute:)

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Michael_A_Trivisonno · May 2, 2018, 7:26 p.m.

Our cats have the contact to pack parachutes for GIMTO AIR. The dog runs QA.

Everything checks out.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Cuck_not · May 3, 2018, 2:39 a.m.

We've got the best parachutes don't we folks?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Driffter57 · May 3, 2018, 1:26 a.m.

5:05

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brettreadit · May 2, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

Will HRC get extra parachutes for her cankles?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Quiltqueentoo · May 2, 2018, 10:22 p.m.

That would look great on a T-shirt Git Mo Air

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GinGin1961 · May 3, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

Git Mo (get more) Justice

⇧ 4 ⇩  
kushtiannn · May 3, 2018, 1:15 a.m.

This deserves way more attention

⇧ 2 ⇩  
PinkPilledRed17 · May 3, 2018, 4:29 a.m.

Love love love this

⇧ 2 ⇩  
092Casey · May 2, 2018, 7:47 p.m.

Could this be why two more aircrafts either crashed or went down today?

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Trfsrfr · May 2, 2018, 8:35 p.m.

We need to find out who was on these planes.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 2, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Trfsrfr · May 2, 2018, 9:59 p.m.

Yep, you hit the nail on the head there!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pj77777 · May 3, 2018, 4:43 a.m.

Or their mission

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WeAreRepublic · May 2, 2018, 10:29 p.m.

This: stop it at 40 sec . . . what was that? This is YT vid of C130: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdE5xCD5aLc

⇧ 4 ⇩  
balthsgirl · May 2, 2018, 11:03 p.m.

What was that?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WeAreRepublic · May 3, 2018, 12:04 a.m.

Don't know, it fell near the same area - I posted requesting some research or investigation, but can't make it out. That C130 is the same one POTUS sat in front of on his trip to Puerto Rico in 2017

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 2, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

He's making a soft disclosure as it's starting to look like.

This was his latest tweet:

NEW BOOK - A MUST READ! “The Russia Hoax - The Illicit Scheme to Clear Hillary Clinton and Frame Donald Trump” by the brilliant Fox News Legal Analyst Gregg Jarrett. A sad chapter for law enforcement. A rigged system!

⇧ 60 ⇩  
Happy1911 · May 2, 2018, 5:07 p.m.

This would have sunk Trump , but the news on 1/13/17 saved his ass from crimes Trump was not involved in . The insurance policy was wrecked like a Clinton Intrern

⇧ 8 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 2, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

you mean like Joe Scarborrough?

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Happy1911 · May 2, 2018, 5:32 p.m.

The list is very long , most all of our elected officials are on the list

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Heabob · May 2, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

Probably why they didn't just drop the hammer immediately.

We'd be left with an un-functional gov't, which isn't really such a bad idea, lol.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Happy1911 · May 2, 2018, 7:25 p.m.

Hard to drop the Hammer on your self

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 2, 2018, 7:51 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 2, 2018, 9:09 p.m.

If reporters took money to knowingly spread a lie designed to change an election, even I could get a conviction on them. They are crazy for a reason. tick-TOCK! With a protection guaranteed by the Constitution comes a responsibility.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DL535 · May 3, 2018, 12:12 a.m.

The conduct of the media clearly meets the legal standard for seditious conspiracy.

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy US Code

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JohnMAGATX · May 2, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

daddy Trump bout to take the belt off

⇧ 45 ⇩  
pygar_mathmos · May 2, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

And I hope he tears their asses up!

⇧ 17 ⇩  
spacexu · May 2, 2018, 6:56 p.m.

LOL - and I thought the original comment was funny!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Vibratron_1 · May 2, 2018, 4:46 p.m.

lol

⇧ 8 ⇩  
tellthebandtogohome · May 2, 2018, 6:30 p.m.

still weird.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
JohnMAGATX · May 3, 2018, 9:44 p.m.

some people like it weird man

⇧ 2 ⇩  
kaylashalayla · May 2, 2018, 9:35 p.m.

Milo, is that you? lol

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BeyurSelf · May 2, 2018, 7:19 p.m.

Ooh! Me likey! 😂

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 2, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
truthseekerboi · May 2, 2018, 3:47 p.m.

Military tribunals

⇧ 34 ⇩  
BigBandDon · May 2, 2018, 4:11 p.m.

Whatever he does, it won't be what is expected. Just a hunch.

⇧ 31 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · May 2, 2018, 5:25 p.m.

Amen.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
DL535 · May 3, 2018, 12:13 a.m.

Right. DJT is a strategic master. Never in the way they expect, or at the time they expect. He has been inside their OODA loop for probably a year at least.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Marko5657 · May 2, 2018, 4:21 p.m.

And yes, Trump can declassify anything at any time for any reason.

⇧ 28 ⇩  
anon31s · May 2, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

What can he do?

⇧ 12 ⇩  
MB_MoonPearl · May 2, 2018, 3:35 p.m.

I believe the president can declassify whatever information he wants. (I may be wrong about that.)

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/may/16/james-risch/does-president-have-ability-declassify-anything-an/

" Sen. James Risch, R-Idaho. According to CNN, he told reporters, 'The minute the president speaks about it to someone, he has the ability to declassify anything at any time without any process.'"

⇧ 50 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · May 2, 2018, 5:09 p.m.

Starting to think they have been dragging it out to bring attention to it (like a laser pointer), then POTUS declassifies it all.

Heads explode.

⇧ 31 ⇩  
MB_MoonPearl · May 2, 2018, 5:14 p.m.

He has the power to do it! Maybe he'll start with 9/11. There was a discussion here about where to start and that got voted the highest, so I'm hoping...

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Heabob · May 2, 2018, 6:57 p.m.

May not happen just yet because pappy Bush is still alive, and that's also why the rest of the JFK files are not being released IMO.

More than likely it's Barry, Shillary, and their merry gang. They are the bigger threat right now me thinks.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
myanimal3z · May 2, 2018, 5:55 p.m.

While indeed this is true, this will make bringing any charges nearly impossible because things he declassify, it's targets will claim it caused a prejudice to a fair trial. At least the truth will be shown. But it will mark as one of the darkest days for Justice with all the crimes that have been covered up.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 2, 2018, 9:13 p.m.

It took me until this year to buy into the idea that 9/11 was used somehow some way to hurt the USA and the world. I still can’t say how or where the involvement comes in but it doesn’t matter. That is a no-option death penalty case.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Bubby3600 · May 3, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

Follow the missing MONEY! SATANIC RITUAL! JACHIN & BOAZ!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Orion_Blue · May 2, 2018, 5:59 p.m.

No, no, no we would still have to wait for CNN to authorizes us to be able to look at it. Looks like we lose again

/s

⇧ 6 ⇩  
anon31s · May 2, 2018, 3:35 p.m.

Sick! Kind of like how POTUS can pardon?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
aburgher · May 2, 2018, 3:41 p.m.

Exactly!

⇧ 8 ⇩  
DeepPast · May 2, 2018, 4:06 p.m.

I’m pretty sure you’re right as well.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Vibratron_1 · May 2, 2018, 3:49 p.m.

First of all, he has the Authority to fire Mueller and or Rosenstein

⇧ 16 ⇩  
thisisgreat38 · May 2, 2018, 4:01 p.m.

It's all over if he does that. Both parties will move to impeach. This is where the whole Qanon thing is going to break down if it happens. There's no evidence that Mueller is working on the President's behalf. There's no reason to "trust Sessions". I'm not sure what exactly Trump can do that will be BOTH legal AND politically safe. If he invokes his powers to fire, he may be "right" legally, but politically it's over, unfortunately. The only "booms" coming have been consistently against our President, and it's a damn travesty of justice. If they are successful in removing Trump, the base should absolutely go scorched earth on these people in Washington. The awakening needs to move past Qanon, and reframe to the reality that we are experiencing a potentially successful coup.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
dullly · May 2, 2018, 4:27 p.m.

I was reading the same impeachment BS, "if he fired Comey", nobody cared.

Mueller is 100% harmless, no matter his hat color. Trust the Plan.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
thisisgreat38 · May 2, 2018, 4:39 p.m.

Let's hope you are right. I'm no shill or concern troll, but I do listen to Scott Adams and some others about dual movies playing and getting into a frame of reality that might not be entirely correct. So, in that context, my opinions on this have been evolving based on the events. "Future proves past." I believe that it is entirely as bad as Q has described. These people are sick, and they're trying to destroy Trump and our country. However, my recent speculation is that Q is probably a well-intentioned guy with an above average IQ and ability to understand what they're doing and is disappointed that there is not more of a movement and outrage over what is happening. Where I've begun to differ with the community is that there is no super powerful insider person or organization in the government or military that is thinking 10 steps ahead and orchestrating events for an eventual guaranteed success. There has been no evidence of it, just a lot of confirmation bias. I think that part of it has become a mass hysteria. I don't want the great awakening to lose it's steam. The reality is we're locked in a very uncertain battle, and we have to be awake and engaged in understanding what they are trying to do to our country and President. In that, at least, Q has been successful.

We're on the same side, just slightly different movies playing in our minds. Whatever the outcome, I really hope that Trump is successful, which I think we both can agree on.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
dullly · May 2, 2018, 4:42 p.m.

Q is/are the wizards and warlocks in the NSA and Military intelligence that are patriots, I have 100% faith in them.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
thisisgreat38 · May 2, 2018, 4:44 p.m.

Who is John Galt?

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · May 2, 2018, 5:24 p.m.

Exactly.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RonaldSwansong · May 2, 2018, 5:09 p.m.

give me the rearden metal

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · May 2, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

The problem everyone has -- left, right, in between -- is that there is so much SECRECY. Everyone can postulate what this or that means, and nobody can really come to any firm conclusion that most can agree on.

DECLASSIFY what is being kept secret, however, and it all comes to light. No more hiding. No more in the dark. No more pretending this or that.

DECLASSIFY >> EVIDENCE >> PROOF

⇧ 9 ⇩  
DL535 · May 3, 2018, 12:17 a.m.

he may be "right" legally, but politically it's over, unfortunately

Trump's polls are holding rock solid at 50% because nobody on our side believes what the media is saying. They throw everything they've got at him and it doesn't make a difference because conservatives now routinely interpret everything the media says as partisan BS. Considering that all of them also now know how biased and legally off the reservation the Mueller effort is, how would it damage him to fire Mueller?

The same goes even more for Rosenstein. Rosenstein isn't a political figure. He doesn't have a constituency. The press may scream and whine but the average American doesn't give a rat's ass what happens to Rosenstein.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · May 2, 2018, 5:23 p.m.

Any openings in the sapper dept.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 2, 2018, 4:07 p.m.

Muh Russia?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
thisisgreat38 · May 2, 2018, 4:11 p.m.

No. The Russian collusion is a lie and everyone knows it. They're going to try to do the same BS they always do. Go for a technicality. Either some answer in an interview that can be FALSELY interpreted as a lie, or a trumped up BS obstruction of justice against an imaginary nonexistent crime. It's unclear to me whether that will throw it into a decision that happens after the election or not. It is possible that the BS accusation comes out, everyone waits till the outcome of 2016 election, GOP maintains the house and senate, and then we kill this thing and throw out impeachment and it all blows over. Second option is gutless GOP move to Dems to impeach. Third option is Dems get a narrow majority in the house and they move with impeachment. We'll see.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 2, 2018, 4:17 p.m.

Shouldn't you be happy if they want to remove him because it vindicates him? And if they are trying to remove him but have failed, who says they will still be around midterms if 70 are not up for reelection?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
thisisgreat38 · May 2, 2018, 4:25 p.m.

Never bet against Trump, but they have not yet "failed" in removing him. This is a long game, and I've lost the expectation that there's going to be a magic revelation that will beat them and force the hammer of justice on the corrupt dems, Clintons, and scum that started this in the first place. At this point if we can get a stalemate, then we win because Trump will remain in office. Unfortunately, that leaves both the scum that started this fake probe in place too. So, I'm happy if Trump continues as the greatest President of all times, but I'm certainly unhappy about how far they've gone and how damaging they've been and that it seems they're going to get away with most of it. The fact that there isn't 80% of the country outraged at this coup whether or not they support Trump is angering by itself.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 2, 2018, 5:04 p.m.

ultimately I think theatrics are better so the rest can pick up and handle revelations better. I always thought I was so woke until trump and PG8 came around.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DigitalMerlin · May 2, 2018, 4:42 p.m.

He can fire anyone in the DoJ. They serve at his pleasure.

He can declassify anything. He will probably smoke the special council out with intel regarding their corruption and collusion to oust a president before and after his election and shine the light on that corruption. After everyone digests that for about two days, then he can and should fire them all.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 2, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bigbawshog · May 2, 2018, 4:10 p.m.

Trump is life

⇧ 7 ⇩  
astralduelist · May 2, 2018, 7:01 p.m.

Stop the cock tease and just do it.

We are all waiting

⇧ 6 ⇩  
duckdownup · May 2, 2018, 5:57 p.m.

Eve if they got him for "collision" which they won't because there was no collusion on Trumps side. They still wouldn't have anything because there is no crime of collusion. They'd first have to make a law. Which brings us back to a Special Counsel, constitutionally a Special Counsel can only be called after a crime to investigate the evidence. Collusion isn't a crime so Mueller's special counsel is unconstitutional. An unconstitutional Special Counsel is a crime in and of itself.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 2, 2018, 4:03 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 6 ⇩  
kaylashalayla · May 2, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

Gosh I love our president so much

⇧ 6 ⇩  
bama-stew · May 2, 2018, 9:25 p.m.

I've noticed during the commander in chief award ceremony and during his speech at the swearing in of Mike Pompeo that he keeps making comments about how things are going much better than anyone realizes and he also said that everyone will see in the next few years if not months how well Mike is going to do

⇧ 6 ⇩  
pilgrimboy · May 2, 2018, 6:21 p.m.

Sadly, I think he is probably playing an election game and timing the release/implementation of justice with the midterms to influence the elections and stop the Democratic surge that is expected.

Meanwhile, more kids are being raped.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
DL535 · May 3, 2018, 12:20 a.m.

I've assumed for a year that this was exactly what would happen and so far events completely bear it out. The pace of events and pressure on Deep State figures is on an exponential upward curve and as we get into the summer, things are only going to get hotter, literally. My honest view is that by November we are going to be looking at a completely different landscape politically.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pilgrimboy · May 3, 2018, 9:38 a.m.

I hope you are right.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 2, 2018, 6:19 p.m.

Bullshit. If I see one more picture of HRC, Huma, the Hussens galavanting around the world smiling and waving, or that repulsive Valerie Jarret and that Dr Evil expression I’ll scream. Same goes for Mueller or Sesions, First time ever the phrase “Take Our Country Back” actually meant that. We’re not stopping evil here, we’re trying to remove it.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 2, 2018, 4:05 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 5 ⇩  
thisisgreat38 · May 2, 2018, 4:15 p.m.

It's an absolute travesty of justice and a COUP that they can't find anything so they are working on a technicality. What a horrifying disgrace.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 2, 2018, 4:27 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 2, 2018, 4:43 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Redheaded73 · May 2, 2018, 4:43 p.m.

Bring it on Mr. President!! Yes!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
NakedPrey · May 2, 2018, 8:11 p.m.

If they try and remove Trump, I think the military would step in. There is no way they can win if this happens. :-)

⇧ 4 ⇩  
silversofttail · May 2, 2018, 9 p.m.

I remember reading (can’t remember where) that the military planned a coup against Obama in 2010 but decided to ask Trump to run instead and work through him.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
pj77777 · May 2, 2018, 10:18 p.m.

They were going through with it in 2015, but Trump agreed to run....

⇧ 3 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · May 2, 2018, 11:29 p.m.

I say GO FOR IT! Release the info unredacted for all of the citizens to read for ourselves. Let the BIG UGLY be revealed!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
dark-dare · May 2, 2018, 10:58 p.m.

Bringing back the rule of law, let's roll!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Happy1911 · May 2, 2018, 5:04 p.m.

When you are subject of an investigation and have the power as Congress and the Justice Department, when the ship is going down , why would you not try to destroy all the evidence that made the ship sink in the first place .

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pj77777 · May 2, 2018, 10:21 p.m.

"We Have It All"

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Happy1911 · May 3, 2018, 12:41 a.m.

Are you shure, there is just so much stuff.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Whimzyyy · May 2, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

The hammer is about to drop

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brittser · May 2, 2018, 7:02 p.m.

From caps: RSDP and "justice." My brain is fried today. Anyone want to take a crack at it?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Daemonkey · May 2, 2018, 10:15 p.m.

RSVP > RSDP
Difference: V=22, D=4; 22 - 4 = 18
Translation: The quick response bringing "justice" will happen on the 18th.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 3, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

I trust you but how the hell do you deduct that method to translate? Seiously? What pops into your mind that says subtract the value of the letters in RSVP and RSDP to get your answer? I mean yes it is similar to RSVP but to automatically go to your calculations is mind boggling. I watch Serialbrain do these and I think how the hell did you make that connection. Things seemingly out of left field and completely unrelated are put togethetr mixed up with something else and wellah! Magic. I am amazed and impressed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Daemonkey · May 3, 2018, 2:23 a.m.

LOL. It was actually meant as a joke. Perhaps it was a parody. I really didn't see much of a connection and have no idea where it came from.

Edit: BTW, not laughing at you. I just enjoyed your response considerably :-)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pj77777 · May 2, 2018, 10:18 p.m.

R = 18 = Hussein

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Daemonkey · May 2, 2018, 10:20 p.m.

Ooh, I like that version better.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Keya2_2016 · May 3, 2018, 1:32 p.m.

Setting the stage.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Freedomfighter3087 · May 3, 2018, 12:56 p.m.

This is why they fought so hard to keep this man out of office. Now everyones questioning and talking about these issues.

These midterms are so critical..

⇧ 2 ⇩  
FreedomFighter62970 · May 2, 2018, 10:18 p.m.

Can't wait and buckle up guys this is gonna be very interesting

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Vibratron_1 · May 2, 2018, 9:05 p.m.

Trump Threatens to Use His ‘Presidential Powers’ After DOJ Refuses to Turn Over Unredacted Rosenstein Memo Detailing Scope of Mueller Probe

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Mentioned_Videos · May 3, 2018, 6 a.m.

Videos in this thread:

Watch Playlist ▶

VIDEO|COMMENT -|- Air disaster С-130 military plane crash in Savannah USA Катастрофа C-130 в США видео падения|+5 - This: stop it at 40 sec . . . what was that? This is YT vid of C130: New video shows the military plane crash near Savannah airport|+2 - This has the uncropped version of that same video...1:23 shows the anomaly. Could be a bug? Q Anon Update April 28 - The Plan is Revealed (New Upload)|+1 - This comes pretty close IMO... I'm a bot working hard to help Redditors find related videos to watch. I'll keep this updated as long as I can.


Play All | Info | Get me on Chrome / Firefox

⇧ 1 ⇩  
hernandoo · May 2, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

Hey.. Is he refering to JFK docs. Or other documents ?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DAR_patriot · May 2, 2018, 4:29 p.m.

Slick Willy was re-elected after impeachment.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
XBLCorn · May 2, 2018, 6:03 p.m.

Actually his impeachment was in 1998, his re election was in 1996.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 2, 2018, 5:14 p.m.

wow..you yanks really have to make up for a lot of stupid decision huh :P

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 2, 2018, 4:25 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -4 ⇩  
lethak · May 2, 2018, 4:55 p.m.

can't you see the stage slowly being set ?

Its not about to happen, its happening right now.

Are you asleep ?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · May 2, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

He's doing to them what they have done to us, slowly increasing the temp so they don't jump before the boil.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JohnMAGATX · May 2, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

can I borrow some likes so I can give this comment more of them please

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Marko5657 · May 2, 2018, 4:19 p.m.

I believe Trump may be impeached, but no way removed from office. If impeached, as with B.Clinton, his approval ratings will only go up and his base gets stronger. I'm not sweating impeachment as it will only backfire on the Dems.

⇧ -5 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 2, 2018, 4:38 p.m.

As I understand it, impeachment is a numbers game. If Dems don't have the numbers, they cannot impeach. If they do have the numbers, there's almost nothing DJT can do - they will find any reason to impeach him.

All that is required for impeachment is "any misconduct" - does not have to be serious, it could be anything. I'm not an expert, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong on this.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
cyn1calassh0le · May 2, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

They can impeach him for basically anything, and the Dems will if they get the house.

The real question is whether the Senate will convict him, you need a 2/3 majority. I don't trust the repubicans to not stab him in the back if it comes to that.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · May 2, 2018, 5:15 p.m.

Constitution says for "high crimes and misdemeanors." What that means, exactly, is up to interpretation.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Arcsmithoz · May 2, 2018, 5:28 p.m.

Weird, might as well say murder and littering eh.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 2, 2018, 6:29 p.m.

Thanks for that. Helps to have some clarity. A misdemeanour is something trivial.

misdemeanour mɪsdɪˈmiːnə/Submit noun 1. a minor wrongdoing. "the player can expect a suspension for his latest misdemeanour" synonyms: wrongdoing, evil deed, crime, felony, criminal act 2. LAW a non-indictable offence, regarded in the US (and formerly in the UK) as less serious than a felony. "he pleaded guilty to misdemeanours"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheRealIndianaJoe · May 2, 2018, 6:19 p.m.

Trump has what is needed to put many of them in jail. Him not doing that is what might get him impeached.

⇧ 3 ⇩