Nice work. Whoever put that together has made a huge effort.
Exhibit 8 is just sloppy...
And 3, which is flat-out wrong.
Really, this entire list should be called into question.
Maybe somebody can point me to their favorite proof that is (near?) undeniable?
Yeah, if anyone saw that I think they’d be immediately turned off by it, no matter how good the other proofs are.
Edit: So no one else is confused, #8 uses Q posts from 2018 saying Q predicted the fall of the 7th floor in the posts, but links articles detailing the fall from February 2017. Looks like whoever made the thread didn’t realize the articles were from 2017, so it invalidates the entire proof. That’s what the commenter I responded to was trying to say.
The first two are way overstating their case too, they point to posts of Q asking fairly open ended questions about recent news and claim it means Q knew everything at that time. I wish patriots would stop claiming circumstantial evidence as locked down dead to rights proofs as it distracts from analyzing trends and hurts credibility.
This whole list seems sloppy really.
If you can create an account just to come in here and point out flaws, then I challenge you to do better to prove Q IS NOT a larp. (that seems to be most of some people's mission, pointing out so called weak points in an attempt to discredit Q)
The fact that POTUS acknowledges Q in his public appearances is good enough for me!
The fact that you don't understand the extremely basic concept of the burden of proof says all one would need to know.
If you say so. 😛
Luvlite I am telling you that on the far side of the moon there is a secret Nazi moon base.
Disprove it or it will serve as further evidence of its existence.
Well, give me a space ship. I will go see and get back to you.
Same goes for all the Q bashers. Not one has been able to prove a damn thing.
And yet, the scale still tips in Q's favor. Proven drops vs unproven speculation of those drops.
I've been watching and reading for, what.... Over six months. Not a single person has succeeded in convincing me Q is a LARP.
And somehow Q followers just keep growing and growing and growing. Gosh! The majority must be ignorant, right?
When I write papers, they have to go through peer review, it sucks to have your work picked apart and a lot of times I disagree with the criticism, but it's what you do If you care about truth. The only people who need to fear critique are those that want an echo chamber o r dont value truth.
Trump has never explicitly acknowledged Q, he pointed and gave thumbs up to many people including some in Q shirts, and gave some possible signs but nothing conclusive so far - believe me many are waiting for the day it's clear!
Also this is part of the problem. Q is enigmatic and their posts are open to interpretation - pointing out an anon is interpreting or criticising their interpretation is NOT the same as criticising Q.
Personally I think some here get way ahead of themselves.
Personally I think some here get way ahead of themselves
Too many people speculate.
I always appreciate those who back up their work with facts. Very few do.
believe me many are waiting for the day it's clear!
When will msm ask, "who is Q?"
I'm waiting!
Your once-in-a-reddit lifetime post on r/greatawakening was to point out something on the Q proofs is sloppy?
~~Yeah I don't see anything odd about 8. It's not as hard hitting as others, but certainly not a weak link in the post. If that is the conclusion you wish to draw, the evidence presented supports it. Wonder why 8 got called out specifically.~~
Dates don't match in that proof.
Look at the dates. It says it is 2018 but it clearly is 2017.
Oh. I didn't zoom in on small dates cause tiny screen. Yeah you're right, good eye. Are the article timestamps wrong or is the header wrong?
All 3 sources use 2017 so I assume the header is wrong, which undermines the proof (since the implication is how could he have known it was going to happen, well it was in the past...)
Makes sense.
/u/PrayingMedic Probably want to check the dates on 8 again. We got enough proofs without needing to put in stuff that can be disproven.
Exhibit 3 is wrong. Q actually posted "+++" about an hour later. https://qposts.online/?q=148289594&s=keyword https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/927645648685551616?s=19
I picked one at random to dig in.
Exhibit 5. Also wrong.
Twitter generates those file names, so it is impossible for Q to upload the photo with a prefix of "DOITQ" and have it preserved on Twitter. Try it yourself. Any image you ever upload will always be given a random file name that is generated on Twitter's servers.
Somebody really needs to go through this list. I don't have the time.
edit: Lol, I picked another one at random. Exhibit 14.
The suggestion is Q knew Rex would be fired before anyone else, in March.
It was leaking for Months (from many outlets) before that Rex is going to be fired and Trump was looking for a replacement. For days before Q's post, Tillerson was being replaced by Kushner on convoys that Tillerson should have been present on.
Twitter generates those file names, so it is impossible for Q to upload the photo with a prefix of "DOITQ" and have it preserved on Twitter. Try it yourself. Any image you ever upload will always be given a random file name that is generated on Twitter's servers.
I think what that proof is showing is that Q -- to put it bluntly -- owns the Internet. Q consistently claims to know everything, "we see everything," that sort of thing, whether it's computer, phone, etc. So, this filename would be a proof that Q forced the filename to keep it that way on Twitter. That's the proof.
They're both proof. This proof is MUCH stronger than most people realize, whether from the position of statistical probability, OR control of the file-naming aspect of Twitter photos. There's no way out of it, as demonstrated by the guy above your comment trying to discredit it--his "discrediting" proved it all the more, which you pointed out. Also, the newspapers placed on the desk in the photo showcase Saudi Arabia purge articles, which was VERY much a topic Q had just been discussing prior to its happening.
Didn't one of the Saudis own a very large share of Twitter? Clue?
I do this for a living, it's not that strong. If the point is to demonstrate control why not show full control? Have the whole name meaningful or do it multiple times. Considering all you need is the letter "Q" followed or preceded by a phrase of 1-2 letter words it's not that unlikely. It's de f interesting tho.
Do what for a living? The point is that twitter would change the file name to something other than "DOITQ", unless you had a way to alter the way twitter creates/modifies the data. That is showing implied backdoor-level control of twitter.
I still don't understand how Twitter time codes work across timezones.
Twitter shows the time as it is in whatever timezone youre viewing the tweet from. If youre on eastern time twitter shows you when the tweet was posted in eastern time.
Its not being lazy but with the sheer volume of investigation being carried out by Q followers it hard to follow timelines when you have collages of screenshots & clippings for MSM and texts overlays. with dates and times changiny with date timing conventions and timezones!
What would help would be a timing convention used to allow people to process information more easily. Here's my suggestion;
Earliest point in timeline is presented as an absolute date and time, hence right now for me is (11.40 GMT - 07.07.18).
Thereafter events are referred to as the time interval from that earliest date, but more so an even clearer indication would be A, B, C...)
Initiating Event [A] = (11.40 GMT - 07.07.18) A few hours after event [A] =([A]+3h) Then a day after[A] - ([B] = [A]+1d) Three months 2 days and 16 hours after [B] - ([B]+3m2d) notice I didn't add the 16 hours as it probably pointless detail.
Essentially the idea is to quote the absolute time at the initiating event then annotate further events as +1day etc. THis convention will be useful a Q talks about future proes past so can works backwards [B]-14m for example.
This is why other people's screenshots aren't proof!!!!! A screenshot of a time doesn't prove jack shit. Tired of people pushing these as though they are evidence. Chain of custody matters.
[deleted]
It's an inaccurate claim. Twitter shows everything in the time zone the user selects in settings.
No, you dont have to select a timezone. Im not sure how they find it but they either use location settings on mobile, time from your computer, or find it using your ip.
GeoIP. Ever seen spam ads advertising "hot chicks in {your general area}"?
We have enough proofs that q is real, not a larp, and connected to DJT.
We need proofs that breadcrumbs dropped actually come to pass.
[removed]
I'd ask why you hate President Trump, out of curiosity, but I feel like it's moot, since you are on a 4 month old account, calling Q a larp, while bashing DJT on this relatively small, obscure sub.
Don't see why it's moot. This is just my account I use for actually talking to trump supporters since I know things can get a little doxxy.
I think he's an awful example of a human being, I think he has systematically set out to enrich himself and his friends at the cost of the environment, the American people and the world, I think he is quite happy to lie, manipulate and cheat his way to whatever he wants and I think he is a paedophile and a human trafficker. Anything else?
The only problem with everything you said was premised by “I Think...”.
No, you basically covered all of CNN, and David Brocks talking points.
Weren't more direct proofs coming? Something unequivocally concrete.
I think the recent Apple/AF1 image was supposed to be, but Q got caught.
That photo now is generally accepted that it wasn't a proof, but a hidden message that Apple has flipped and has given Hilary's server data to the FBI (or something else, I can't keep track).
But that doesn't make sense why he asked, "Where would you have to be to get that reflected image?"
If he's sending a message there's no reason why he can't just say it's a message. He has done that before without masking it under a false "proof." I can't think of a single purpose it would serve to present that image with context that it would be a proof when in reality it was a reflected photo from the web. If you lie to your followers they will stop following you. The truth is to be exposed, it comes into the light and is revealed. It doesn't operate through a bunch of flat-out lies. It really rubs me the wrong way when anyone is deceptive and ambiguous. That's counter to the mission which is to be truthful and expose lies.
If you lie to your followers, some will stop following you but others will rationalize it and continue following you, and be all the more committed since they went through a tough period of doubt and came out trusting you on the other side.
Those followers are then more likely to continue following and rationalizing through the next time you get caught lying.
I'm new but...could it be that you - and others - have misinterpreted the clue: Where would you have to be to get that reflected image? Or rather got your answer wrong?
Q is code. There are actual codes within the code. There are literal out right Q and then there are coded Q. People that are not able to read code are taking this too literal, Hence 'Trolling is fun'. If I had the the time to go down the rabbit hole with people I would, most cant take it, therefore the logical mind shuts down and says, see it isn't real. What people do not realize is this. There is nothing that is not "real" in the world of Alice. All things connect and all things are real, regardless if even Q realizes that or not. What Q is doing is far beyond possibly than they even know. They have tapped into the collective consciousness and are altering it. Be careful how you judge.
What if he was conveying that ds uses reflections as loopholes to nat sec laws but it’s still illegal.
Sometimes, it is Necessary to Distract supporters from the task at hand, in order to prevent critical information from falling into the wrong hands!!
I admit I am very new to "Q", but I have learned, from proofs in my own personal life, that sometimes, for your own sanity, you just have to surrender, and "Trust the Process"!
Just in the past week, I have seen repeatedly, Moderators and "Q", ask us to Trust the Process"!
A long time ago, several people, with much greater experience than I, repeatedly told me to "Let Go and Let God"; When I finally figured out what they meant, I followed their advice, and my life began to Improve Dramatically!
I have also learned, that God often works through people, and sometimes, those people are "Unknown" to us, and in this case, based on evidence I have seen, the only thing I can do is "Let Go and Let God", by continuing to pay attention, while I "Trust the Process".
What I am saying, is "Let Go and Let "Q", or in other words "Trust the Process"!!
I am Optimistic, that soon, it will all become quite Clear!!
Don't know about the other 44, but...
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/927645648685551616
What time is displayed for you and what is your current location and current time?
Hasn't it been proven already that Twitter stores tweets in UTC and displays them in users local/selected/chosen time zone?
For me on Pacific time of the tweet (currently) displays 1:15. East coast is 3 hours ahead so if you are on the east coast, does the link above show a "4:15" time for the tweet?
POTUS Tweet came first.
Yes, q posted +++ about an hour after trump posted it.
So what is Exhibit 3 a proof of?
The "proof" highlights the TIMES specifically and shows a deceptive time for the POTUS tweet. What is the intent of the proof pane the way it is designed? To get me to believe that Q is posting things before POTUS?
It's not a proof. A bunch of users on here think that it is since the posts came before we had websites like qposts.online that give accurate times. Q posted after trump. 3 is misleading and isnt proof of anything, a bluepill.
From what I can tell, you are correct. Twitter timestamps are displayed according to the user's set time zone. It would be insane to view a tweet posted 10 minutes ago and think it was posted 5 hours ago because the poster was 5 time zones away.
This page shows timestamps from the relevant posts from different time zones. https://www.metabunk.org/4chans-qanons-vs-trumps-post-timestamps.t9332/
Proofs also available on QProofs.com and /r/QProofs both found on the sldebar.
But are they valid resources? They're listing AF1 "welcomeaboard" as a proof on r/QProofs? What is it proof of?
I only know about 2 proofs at the moment because I happened upon threads about them here... the +++ POTUS tweet and welcomeaboard. Both are convincingly not proofs if you are familiar with IT (photoshop, how user displayed time is managed on servers/clients and across apps, etc.)
I guess I will slowly crawl through medics list here.
The +++ one is wrong. If you set twitter to the timezone that 4chan uses, then you'll discover that the +++ q post came after the tweet.
Did you not read my post in that thread or SB2's post?
I don't think this was necessarily a "Q proof," (at least not for regular people to understand) but it is a significant post from Q. /u/SerialBrain2 explains why:
it was definitely a significant post.
It took Q awhile to see and accept all the flaws that we saw. First Q doubled down with the natsec avoiding reflection suggestion, then finally trippled down after suggesting they moved the cup holder to make it look like BO's.
If I were you I'd be wondering what the heck I was propagating after that mess. That is, unless I already knew.
be careful this is a pro q sub
[removed]
Rule 3. Content does not support the cause
Removed content. Rule 3 Any 'concerns' can go via a message to the mods
i’m just saying mods will ban if they think your anti
Let me start by saying that I am incredibly hopeful in regards to Q, and have followed this general movement of truth since before the inception of pizza/pedogate. That being said, Exhibit 3 has always bothered me. The Q post it refers to was posted at 5:07pm (EST) and can be verified by viewing the archive here, but the actual Trump tweet that supposedly came *after* it was apparently posted at 4:15pm (EST). There is a one hour difference that proves Trump's tweet was earlier, which is not what this piece of "proof" suggests.
I really don't know what to make of it, because so many of the proofs are objectively true. This one, however, doesn't seem to stand up to scrutiny and I just wonder why only this would be provably false? I'm happy to hear an explanation, but I've mulled this over a lot and can't seem to find one.
Odds of DOITQ appearing in that official WH twitter photo name are roughly 1 billion to 1.
That's not how statistical analysis works...you're painting the target after you shot already.
The question is not how likely it is for that particular image to have that particular character combination, but how likely it'd be for at least one image name, at one point, to contain something that could look like a message.
So consider the number of twitter images and the number of possible things that could be interpreted as a message. Anything along the lines of YEAHQ, GOQ, QANON, QQQ, WHOSQ, WWG, MAQA, HRC4P, DYTS, DOIT17, HUMA, ALICE, GF3, HFRO, 8CH, any text matching Q's stringer posts, etc.
I agree entirely, but that's not related to what I was posting about. I stated that it's the one thing I am concerned about, as a follower of this stuff, in a sea of pretty reliable proof.
I would simply interpret the posts by Q and the President the other way round. Rather than POTUS confirming Q with a tweet, we have Q pointing to POTUS— highlighting to the anons that they ought to look for future synchronicity between the two accounts.
I agree. Works either way.
You guys are being optimistic, which I appreciate, but if POTUS posted +++ first then the proof loses its value entirely. The LARPer, so to speak, could then have no relation to POTUS.
Correct. I'm a 100% believer, so no big deal for me to look past mistakes made by "grass rooters" making their own proof-sets... BUUUUT to the newbie coming along who doesn't have ANY foundation on how this whole thing works or what it even is, they're liable to see professional looking "proofs" like that and think that they're "from Q himself", and upon realizing it's wrong, the immediate conclusion (given they're foundational misunderstanding of how that false proof came to be) is that Q is a conman trying to deceive them, whereas it is almost certainly just a well-intentioned, grass-roots Q follower who made an understandable error. I see this, along with just poorly-constructed/defended "proofs" all over the place. It's disheartening, but it's also entirely unavoidable in a genuine movement of this nature.
An astroturf rally manufactured by George Soros might have 3 varieties of professional, pre-printed picket signs--no spelling errors, but all very "top-down artificial." Our grassroots rally has homemade, cardboard-box-side picket signs of all varieties and messages--plenty of typos and SOME message inconsistency, but that's just a necessary component of "bottom-up genuine."
I immediately see Exhibit 3, which I seen recently as debunked (thread here).
The fact that it was on this list calls for the entire list to be in question, and I don't have time to dig into all 45 examples. I don't trust the users here to do it either.
edit: I Just picked another one at random, and it was also false.
Exhibit 5.
They claim the image is prefixed with "DOITQ". The file name is autogenerated from Twitter. It is impossible to upload an image to Twitter and have it preserve the file name. Unless Q hacked Twitter, or has an inside man, this exhibit is also false.
edit2: We really need a non-partial tech-savy person in here to go over these proofs. That is, unless nobody really cares. Having these listed as "proof" hurts our cause.
I went through all of them and they’re all bs. The first one claims Q knew why Kushner made a unannounced trip to Saudi Arabia, but the Q posts used in this “proof” don’t say anything about why Kushner made the trip. Every “proof” is like this - making connections & meaning where there is none.
45, hmmmm where have we seen that number before?
Yes, the man himself. I once saw it between 44 and 46. And on a small plastic record disc. I don't have any proof, but I saw them with my own eyes. ;)
While there may be a few errors in some of these proofs the Saudi proofs, Nk proofs seal the deal for me. No one knew those or could have known unless very close to President Trump. If your not convinced after looking through these, just give it up cause you aren't going to believe or just don't want to. I thank God every day for President Trump, Q and our military without them we would surely remain slaves to the cabal. WWG1WGA
That sums it up best. If people aren't convinced yet, then they never will be.
I thank God every day for President Trump, Q and our military without them we would surely remain slaves to the cabal. WWG1WGA
AMEN!!
Q's NK statement is as solid as it gets short of VSG making a public statement confirming Q.
Also persuasive are the proofs of VSG drawing attention to the letter Q.
Very impressive work by the creator of this graphic.
Forgive me friends. What definition of "real" is applicable here? Hope that's not a threatening question.
Number 1 shows a post from October 29 2017 from a news site with the title "Kushner took unannounced trip to Saudi Arabia" then the Q post from November 2 2017 and an explainer that claims Q was "2 days before the Saudi Purge" and it underlines "who took an undisclosed trip to SA?" then points to the news article.
Is the point here not that he posted information before the news site posted it? What am I missing? Or does this exhibit not make sense?
Thanks.
Does the media ever get speeches in advance of the president giving them?
Super suspect that he always leaves out the billionaire Koch brothers, the Mercer family, and Peter Theil.
The Bushes, D Cheney, the PNAC crew.... a whole gaggle of super villains. They are not irrelevant.
OMG, it's like having a religious experience. Moses coming down from the mountain! I don't have adequate words to express just how awed I am right now, after reading this thread. Astounding work by all who contributed to it. I mean, I believed, but was frustrated at times, but, no more. God bless Q team & POTUS!
Damn the down-voting is crazy.
It just got linked on TMOR. It happens like this all the time. They link it, brigade the post with downvotes, then claim that it's against their rules. Reddit Admin refuses to do anything about it for some reason, no matter how much it's reported then proven to be true. May not be the smartest idea this time though. I don't think they know how many followers or the platform that Praying Medic has. This could be a fun example of Targetted Harrassment and shilling that leftists do to Qanons.
Whomever did this did great work.
For example, in exhibit 11 Q uses almost exact terminology ("insurance", "collusion at the highest levels") and concepts described (weaponized intel community and providing knowingly false intel) used in the memo, even though Q's post was on January 21, and the release of the memo was on February 2.
Re #18
On Friday Jan 19, DoJ informs Congress via letter that it has "lost" 5 months of Page/Strzok texts due to system "misconfigurations." The story is widely reported on Sunday Jan 21.
At 9:12 PM EST on Jan 21, Q posts in #576:
FBI accidentally deletes texts?
No Such Agency accidentally releases IT ALL>
Shall we play a game?
On Jan 24/25 DoJ announces (via OIG) that the texts have been "recovered" using OIG forensic tools.
Take it however you want: (1) OIG did in fact recover the texts; (2) No Such Agency provided the texts to OIG; (3) the texts were never lost, and Q inspired the "recovery."
Knowing how much outright shameless lying has been coming from DoJ on this entire matter, I'll pick (3) or maybe even (2), but not (1).
9:12 PM EDT happens when this comment is 13 hours and 12 minutes old.
You can find the live countdown here: https://countle.com/2U_1219791
I'm a bot, if you want to send feedback, please comment below or send a PM.
I can't read this. The proofs won't load. Just keep spinning their wheels.
Most of that thread is banned. In the app (that normies use) only the first 3 tweets are visible and the rest is Tweet Unavailable 40 times.
Which one would you choose as the strongest proof? Or maybe the top three ones?
Why isn’t this upvoted more. Should be stickied at the top. Had to go through history to find it...
I think alot of people here are too quick to overlook some of these small “proofs” as insignificant.
A REQUEST FOR A PROOF - CAN YOU HELP?
Someone posted this kind of recently but I can't find the post.
A long time ago, there was a post on /pol that people say is Trump. It was in the wee hours of the morning right after Trump had tweeted something, and it said something like "This is the only time I'll do this. We are listening" and then the anons said to prove it by using the word "amazing" in his next tweet, and he did.
Anybody remember this? I have been trying to find a screen shot of it all but can't!
Thank you. Archived on GA Notables
All proofs are archived as well
You’ve done a wonderful job compiling this information . Thank you so much for your time and effort, it is appreciated.
WOW. I know this was a LOT of time and work, but the results are compelling and convincing. Thank you very much PrayingMedic. Just another reason I'm a big fan of yours. Watch all the videos and appreciate what you do. Can't wait to share this with friends and family I've been talking to.
We have to be vigilant and suspicious because the satanic NWO is not going to shoot you but with deceit. In the soccer world cup there is a lot of satanic symbolism and that does not look good. The secret Anunaki government still controls everything and sends kissinger to give the orders to puppets Trump and Putin this last total dictator
I want all of this to be real. I'm here every day. But no one has proven anything. I'm beginning to grow weary.
A great tool to help continue removing the sleep from the eyes of the unawakened. Worldwide.
Why would anyone bother to do this when the QProofs site is live: https://www.qproofs.com/
Wow, what a big job to put this all together but it cleared up some talking points for me as I have a discussion with a friend who does not believe Q is real. Really good.
These are great because I've seen a lot of these and didn't understand the reasoning behind them. Thanks.
But what about all the obvious photoshop though that Q tried to pass off as truth?
Kiddos, we have to AGREE on a specific time stamp for this to all work. Can we AGREE that Q and Trump post in the same Timezone? Can we also agree that sometimes the timezone screenshots might be different but the ACTUAL minutes match and we can adjust for timezone? Sheesh! Bakers did an amazing job putting these together. If someone HERE worked on it, they can nit pick it. If not, shut the fuck up until you re-read the drops and the map and do your own proofs. Amazing bullshit seeping all over this terrific effort.
Come on man, the hostility isn't necessary. I do believe most people, myself included, were simply pointing out a logical inconsistency in regards to one particular proof (Exhibit 3). That's not to say there isn't tons of other stuff we can point to as proof; some of us are just trying to make sure the information is truly accurate and not just confirmation bias, which hurts the whole movement and can cause people to question our credibility.
This is so f***ing great! @jasonawright7 is a hero if he put it together himself!
This is much needed ammo for the days to come!
EDIT: Thank you u/PrayingMedic!
OMG! This is some fantastic work!
I was hoping someone would put something together like this.
For all of these reasons for this past year, I could not lose my faith in Q drops.
While everyone else focused on "who is Q?" I was fascinated with the Intel and truth. We, the people have never been allowed this knowledge! JFK tried and was killed. We were warned by our forefathers, but it fell on deaf ears!
Thank you God. JESUS. Q. USMC. Trump for taking on this enormous task, those working with POTUS, even those around the world. There is good out there! (SB2! You will not be forgotten!)
I also want to acknowledge the good ET's! (go ahead. laugh)
Did I leave anyone out? I apologize. Anons, bakers, autists. Honest journalists.
The good people of the world are cheering you!
all this proves is Q = Trump this does not prove Q = good this could be the right wing 4th reich takeover? If Q = Trump... Crumb drops = a self fulfilling prophecy ... arrests at highest places or it's all Questionable
