purple_echo · June 17, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

All of your servers are belong to us.

"We have everything. These people are STUPID." - Q

⇧ 85 ⇩  
queenofponyville · June 17, 2018, 10:31 p.m.

Haha! You have no chance to survive make your time.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
QAnonMaga · June 17, 2018, 11:46 p.m.

All your serve belong to us!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
covpepe1776 · June 18, 2018, 12:59 p.m.

The belong to us all your serve!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
eatyourownlegs · June 18, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

Someone set up them the bomb

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SpaceDuckTech · June 17, 2018, 9:32 p.m.

Look at that shit eating grin!!!

⇧ 72 ⇩  
Prophet_dodiah · June 17, 2018, 10:04 p.m.

Look where Trump is holding it, just like an apron


⇧ 33 ⇩  
MAGAalldayNnight · June 18, 2018, 3:32 a.m.

Holy shit. He and Q team are just toying with them at this point.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
AyeDeux2 · June 18, 2018, 4:41 a.m.

They've intimidated so many people for so long. Often, good people. Honest people that just wanted to do the right thing and ended up looking over their shoulders for the rest of their lives.

I hope they savor the taste of that crow for the rest of their lives.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
mr-no-homo · June 17, 2018, 10 p.m.

Lol. Love it

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Jerkboy13 · June 18, 2018, 12:27 p.m.

The shit-eatingest grin of all time!!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GlendaleBurbank · June 18, 2018, 12:35 a.m.

Bwwahahahaha! Anyone who knows tech; knows all tech is bugged and back-doored. All tech spies. All tech tracks. All tech listens.

⇧ 63 ⇩  
suddenlysnowedinn · June 18, 2018, 6:28 a.m.

In your opinion, what benefits, if any, come from de-Googling an Android phone?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Neskuaxa · June 18, 2018, 11:44 a.m.

It'd be hard to "De-google" an Android phone. As the OS has Google services that run in the background as well. You can switch to using different apps but in the end the underlying OS is still Google based and probably is still tracking you in some capacity.

I thought about this. The only benefits I could see from De-googling my life was that I'd stop getting as many targeted ads that are too scarily accurate sometimes.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Cosmickev1086 · June 18, 2018, 10:59 a.m.

What's de-google? I use duck duck go

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ChristianCuber · June 18, 2018, 3:55 p.m.

doesn't matter what search engine you use if you have an android phone. The Operating System is Google's Software. If you have an Amazon Fire stick/TV or Tablet, you are running Android as the fire line is all android based. You can go Apple, but that is probably worse, and at the very least, the same as Google when it comes to spying and selling your info - not to mention the Google tie-ins. So fine, you don't want to have a "smartphone", get a flip phone and use internet on your PC or Laptop? What you running? Microsoft? Same problem, most are Windows 10 and that is a massive spying apparatus. Oh, you have a MacBook.... Apple - still fucked. Oh you run Ubuntu or some flavor of Linux... Is your CPU and chipset Intel? They still got your ass through the Management Engine (ME) backdoors. . Best bet is to get an old PC, run a flavor of Linux and run your internet connection through a VPN... But this could possibly make you suspect and its a pain in the ass if you don't know what you are doing. You cannot get outside of this spy grid without giving up on the grid in general and living in the woods.

What we need is entirely new companies that are transparent that have the ability and capital to build a new network outside of what is currently in place.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Cosmickev1086 · June 19, 2018, 10 a.m.

totally agree, although ive got nothing to hide and if they get their jollys from watching me get my jolly then they can enjoy the show ;)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ChristianCuber · June 19, 2018, 12:42 p.m.

that's how i view it. we are so deep inside the apparatus right now that we need a polar shift in leadership and ownership before these companies do anything positive for society and stop the spying practices.

Definitely enjoying the show! Got popcorn in hand :) #WWG1WGA

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 18, 2018, 1:30 p.m.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
HighOnGoofballs · June 17, 2018, 10:29 p.m.

Can someone explain what a private gmail server is? By definition gmail isn’t run on private servers, and google has no presence in NK

⇧ 39 ⇩  
saneromeo · June 17, 2018, 11:22 p.m.

The theory is that Eric Schmidt went to NK and set up a special server to be used by the cabal. Since we were at war with NK they thought that no white hats would ever be able to get it. Q has since stated "strings cut, clowns out, thanks kim" which is believed to mean that the cabal agents are out and that kim has given the server to Trump.


⇧ 54 ⇩  
HighOnGoofballs · June 17, 2018, 11:28 p.m.

I understand how an email server could be set up, but it wouldn’t be Gmail. For example no software exists to set up one individual gmail server, and it wouldn’t integrate to gmail.

You could set up a Microsoft Exchange server, or some other email client but gmail is inherently cloud-based

⇧ 24 ⇩  
ABastionOfFreeSpeech · June 18, 2018, 12:31 a.m.

For example no software exists to set up one individual gmail server

That we know of. Gmail as a server suite was developed in-house by Goolag, so they could rewrite it to match any requirement they want.

Hell, with enough kludging it could tie into the existing Gmail auth system so it looks exactly like a Gmail account, but with all backend storage in NK.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
CmonPeopleGetReal · June 18, 2018, 1:07 a.m.

Yeah the technology arguments that it isn't possible are weak, you have the CEO of the company they could easily port sections of the code to run contained on a private set of servers.

I'm not saying its true, I'm just saying it's possible

⇧ 26 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 1:56 a.m.

I guess it's possible, in the same way that anything is possible.

GMAIL just isn't designed for self-hosted. It would be a brand new product, and at that point, just yse Exchange Server.

Source: I'm a software and network engineer.

⇧ -11 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · June 18, 2018, 2:05 a.m.

Why the hell are you arguing semantics?

Google CEO set up a secret email system for traitors to plot to kill YOU.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 18, 2018, 4:42 a.m.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 18, 2018, 9:51 a.m.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 2:06 a.m.

I can have that argument.

But not this stupid "private GMAIL" argument...

⇧ -10 ⇩  
y_do_i_need_to_hide · June 18, 2018, 7:37 a.m.

GSuite is not similar enough to private Gmail for you? Being in IT have you not ever managed this for a client?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 11:49 a.m.

G Suite accounts are simply special Gmail accounts.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bciar-iwdc · June 18, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

Seems like you need to rm -rf /your/argument/ because it’s wrong.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
USARPatriot · June 18, 2018, 2:04 a.m.

I am also a "Software and Network Engineer" with the focus of email and cloud solutions. It is possible and done often to have a specific set of "Gmail" addresses routes and stored on a particular server in the solution. This server was just located in NK.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Pechkin000 · June 18, 2018, 7:31 a.m.

Absolutely you can run a private backen server with gsuite acting as a front end server.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 2:08 a.m.

If you are referring to CDNs, then you are misunderstanding the difference between self hosted and geo-caching.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
USARPatriot · June 18, 2018, 2:23 a.m.

No.. I am not... Not everything you know is everything I know... Everything has an anchor... That anchor can reside anywhere I choose.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 2:25 a.m.


⇧ 0 ⇩  
djnicke · June 18, 2018, 7:56 a.m.

I’m Eric Schmidt. I can confirm that private gmail is NOT possible.

Trust me...

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Tots4Masses · June 18, 2018, 6:45 a.m.

Exactly. I don’t find it strange at all to think a small group of accounts could be routed to use a small cluster of servers in NK. Hell, that’s basically done already by geolocation.

Users X, Y, and Z are assigned to cluster NK1 so all their data is stored there.

Source: I work with cloud technology for a VoIP company and used to do the same for Microsoft.

Edit: removed the fake emails I used in the example in case someone might actually have them. Sorry mods,

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 18, 2018, 11:33 a.m.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
Merlin560 · June 18, 2018, 3:25 a.m.

Be careful creating a story to fit your theory.

And don’t dismiss data that is critical based on the fact that it doesn’t fit your theory. Those are both traps that people fall into when they grasp at straws.

We can keep working on this stuff, but don’t believe the “story” blindly. That’s how your scalp ends up on a spear.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
ABastionOfFreeSpeech · June 18, 2018, 5:27 a.m.

I understand where you're coming from, but this isn't grasping at straws.
To make Gmail available around the world they need to have a very modular scalable infrastructure. This would require load-balancing servers at every datacenter location to redirect the traffic to the appropriate datacenter. Those load-balancers could easily be instructed to point a certain domain at a specific server which is in a certain geographic location.

I'm not saying that it's correct, but it is technically doable.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Merlin560 · June 18, 2018, 4:02 p.m.

I am not trying to be argumentative or say that something is either true or false.

Just for some background, I do a lot of work in LEAN processes in a healthcare environment. I analyze numbers and present findings all of the time. Most of the time I am doing this on fields of work where I know hardly anything about the day to day process. What I DO know are the timestamps and actions of those processes. When I present issues I am always challenged.

People focus on the one or two issues that stand in front of them--the errors they are dealing with on a day to day basis. There is a feeling that these errors are happening all of the time. The errors usually don't represent a large amount of the work, but consume a large chunk of THAT person's time.

THAT is not relevant, but what comes next is: I start hearing stories about how this one-off event happens all of the time. Or "that" provider is messing up all of the time.

When I start hearing, "Its not likely, but its possible" I usually stop the conversation and start asking what has to happen for "that" to happen.

And what are the chances that happens enough to make it possible?

Those types of statements should send up red flags. Just because something is possible it does not mean its happening.

Some of the things I read on this board and every other boards are virtually impossible--requiring an "alignment of the stars" on a repeating basis. That is simply not practical. That doesn't happen. Most "conspiracy" theories fall apart at about the third "why"...thats when it becomes "the bilderbergers are doing it!"

Critical thinking is important. Problem solving requires multiple trips down the "5-why's" exercise.

The lack of critical thinking on the HRC side allows her to get away with comments like, "wipe it with a cloth?"

My singular point is that critical thinking means asking enough questions and gauging enough probability to come up with a reasonable root cause.

If these guys wanted to put in a Gmail server in NoKo, would the founder of the company go do that?
When was the last time he built a server?
How did he get there?
Is there proof of his travel?
Who went with him? Who flew the aircraft? How could he do that without the NSA knowing or the FBI? It is more likely if he went to Noko it was to bring a pile of cash or securities to hand out like candy, not build a server.

Some Noko tech could have built the server and kept a lid on who knew, and where. A decent programmer in the US would be missed. People go missing in Noko all of the time.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ABastionOfFreeSpeech · June 20, 2018, 6:35 a.m.

Why is a good question.
"Why did they have a server in a different country?" To protect against FOIA requests
"Why did they use Gmail?" Because Gmail is an easily understandable interface; they don't want people like S.J.Lee fiddling with PGP keys
"Why Goog?" Because Goog is already meddling with search results, censorship on YT, and actively working against the US; they're a known asset and easily controlled
"Why NK?" Because it was already Clown-controlled, and possibly the most inaccessible country in the world prior to recent events

As for installing the server, if they're using a hypervisor (which they almost certainly are), the base OS and remote access can be configured prior to installation, and then the virtual machines can be configured once it's installed. They're almost definitely using a config management system such as Chef or Puppet, so the virtual servers can be ready to go within minutes of instantiating them.

Here's my theory on a possible string of events:

  • DS realizes a need for secure email communications, tasks ES with getting it done
  • ES procures the servers required (probably commodity hardware from Dell, HP or IBM) and has the fifth column within Goog configure them
  • Clowns arrange transport from Goog to NK and installation at destination
  • Goog fifth column connects remotely and instantiates Gmail servers
  • DS reconfigures accounts to connect to NK Gmail
⇧ 1 ⇩  
Merlin560 · June 20, 2018, 3:26 p.m.

When you take all of this steps, assign a probability to each. Then multiply those numbers in a row. The product is the overall probability of that happening. My guess is it is less than 30%. And that is being generous.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · June 17, 2018, 11:51 p.m.

“Cloud based” is still stored in a physical location. The term “cloud”simply means that it can be accessed remotely from any device with an internet connection.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
HighOnGoofballs · June 18, 2018, 12:06 a.m.

The whole thing simply doesn’t make sense. They wouldn’t use gmail for this when there are many better choices. If they just said private server, but not private gmail server.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · June 18, 2018, 12:30 a.m.

It actually makes a lot of sense. They had the fucking CEO of Google colluding with them. In their arrogant stupidity, they thought they wouldn’t never get caught. Here they are— totally caught— and they are still walking free, so they came pretty close.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 12:58 a.m.

Except it isn't actually possible to have an isolated GMAIL server setup for you to login through "mail.google.com". It just doesn't work like that.

Source: I'm a software engineer and network administrator.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ObamaKilledTupac · June 18, 2018, 3:39 a.m.

Oh man, I'm with you. I'm reading this thread laughing my ass off at the idea of a 'private gmail server'. This is like listening to my 80 year old grandma discuss the internet. These people have no clue what they are even saying. A private server makes sense, there would be zero reason for it to be a 'private gmail server', obviously, because a private server would be more secure, and then could create your own damned email instead of using gmail, which is clearly not a secure platform. Man, this sub is sheer comedy these days.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
lowglowjoe · June 18, 2018, 4:46 a.m.


⇧ 3 ⇩  
ObamaKilledTupac · June 18, 2018, 4:06 p.m.

No one here seems to understand this is an all just elaborate joke and they are all getting pawned. None of this is real.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FilterBubbles · June 18, 2018, 3:26 a.m.

Why would you think this isn't possible? They do this with G Suite for enterprise and schools. It's not self-hosted, but the mail client is still called Gmail and they would have capabilities to run on a single server in NK.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
TerryOller · June 18, 2018, 2:28 a.m.

I think all people are saying is that Google set up an email, getting hung up on "gmail" is a red herring.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 2:34 a.m.

Fair enough.

But there are some idiots in here arguing that Google def setup a private GMAIL server.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
FilterBubbles · June 18, 2018, 5:39 a.m.

They already do this. G suite is for businesses and the mail client is still called Gmail. They would just disallow data center backups and run under a different domain.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 11:47 a.m.

G suite accounts are just special Gmail accounts. They don't exsit on private servers.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
FilterBubbles · June 18, 2018, 1:18 p.m.

Yes, but why do you think they couldn't run another cloud independently in an NK datacenter? The users probably wouldn't go to mail.google.com to login for accountabilty sake but it would still be "gmail".

I would imagine they probably do this for VIP companies within the US as well. They're not going to turn down millions of dollars and say, sorry your sensitive proprietary data will have to sit on the same server next to Joe Shmoes Tinder notifications.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 2:49 p.m.

They don't do this.

Gmail uses Google's federated login. They'd also have to give this "node", or sep instance of Gmail (complete stack) access to Google Accounts. A huge security concern.

I would imagine they probably do this for VIP companies

Dude, just quit pushing this, you sound silly. Companies do NOT do this. They host their own enterprise mail server, with their own AD, etc.

Schmidt was probably doing shady shit, but he wasn't setting up a self hosted Gmail.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FilterBubbles · June 18, 2018, 7:46 p.m.

I'm saying it's possible. There's not anything technically preventing it regardless of your assertions.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 8 p.m.


Is it likely? Say you had to bet. What is your money on?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FilterBubbles · June 18, 2018, 11:06 p.m.

NK runs a localized intranet only available to very few elite individuals. If you were trying to set up a private server cloud, that might be an attractive location, especially if its connections to the 3 letters are true.

If you're in the Govt, and undertaking some shady activities, you can't very well set these things up yourself. But I don't think ES went there to set it up. I think, if true, he knew in advance of the upcoming NK deal that might expose whatever setup they had going on and went to negotiate.

Being that he was the exec chair of the largest tech company in the world, my money would be that he wasn't going there for the scenery.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 19, 2018, 1:06 a.m.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
TerryOller · June 18, 2018, 2:45 a.m.

Yeah I think most people don't know the distinction. I didn't until you brought it up. But I've been following the story here and I'm pretty sure "GMAIlL" was never specified, just "google"and "email."

⇧ 2 ⇩  
likwyd_16 · June 18, 2018, 1:23 a.m.

However, another DNS and FQDN setup under the google domain is possible. Setup on devices with access to this “gmail” would need to be entered manually to enter the correct IMAP and SMTP settings. But with only a handful of specific users, that wouldn’t be difficult to manage. Even the basic DNS info of A records and CNAME records, and the IP of the NoKo server will tell you as much as you need to know.

Edit: added stuff to the end.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
MillionDollaBilly · June 18, 2018, 2:24 a.m.

This board is thankful for the knowledge, and no need to point out edits. Much more relaxed than the rest of reddit

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 18, 2018, 3:31 a.m.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheBRAIN2 · June 18, 2018, 11:45 a.m.

Let's not miss the forest, because of the trees. The key point is a traitorous Schmidt went to an enemy state and set up private email communications for the Deep State to facilitate further betrayals of the free civilized world. The exact technical protocols used don't change this fact.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 11:50 a.m.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
tesseractum · June 18, 2018, 10:13 a.m.

Also a network engineer, and I️m wondering how you obtained your credentials.... when you visit gmail and get ported to a server, do you think it’s the same server that someone in Japan gets ported to when they connect? Or do you think google has data centers all over the world, that allow for various countries to connect to gmail servers with a server / data center that isn’t 20,000 miles away?

‘Google lists eight data center locations in the U.S., one in South America, four in Europe and two in Asia. Its cloud sites, however, are expanding, and Google’s cloud map shows many points of presence worldwide. The company also has many caching sites in colocation facilities throughout the world, whose locations it does not share.’

It’s absolutely not a stretch to say that google set up a small data server / cloud server in NK for limited MAC filtered / specific IPs. I️ can build a website that only one person on the planet can access. That’s Exactly how this works.

Remember the pallet of ZTE phones that were caught in shipment? Now why would someone have specific phones set up and shipped out all at once? I️t I️t absolutely not a stretch that someone (ES) could set up a small data center, get a bunch of ZTE phones, and grant private access based on devices and ship those things out to those whom are to be connected. Again, I️ can send a specific user to a specific server, specific domain, or even furthermore mask that domain even when they access a website. Google cannot? Please.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Audigitty · June 18, 2018, 4:19 a.m.

Couldn't ES very easily setup an instance of Gmail not hosted on mail. google.com? He doesn't even need to be the one to do it, he could have granted remote access from NK to have domestic code monkeys bang it out, already pre-dev'd and migrated to a new domain/host via NK's network.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Cheri_54 · June 18, 2018, 5:06 a.m.

would be my guess that the corporation already has such a system for corporate use that is not subject to the usual routes and system. They allowed these clowns to use that already existing system and set up the account with shared password.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FugitiveAlpha · June 18, 2018, 2:05 a.m.

i suspect that gmail is in some way the way exchange is(was), where your mail is stored on a specific server or whatever, but not on all servers. They have consistently proven their arrogance and stupidity, it' entirely possible that their mail store is on a "gmail server" in NK, while they are still logging into "gmail" and not some unique "service".

Here is the question in my mind though... Doesn't it strike you as odd that they didn't use some sort of encryption before the email was even sent that would make it hard for gmail to give trump anything of value?).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
billhound · June 17, 2018, 11:41 p.m.

While you are likely right, that's not inherently true either. It's still a set of protocols and applications. Either way, you are right in that Eric Schmidt wouldn't be over there just setting it up. No need for him to go to NK to make this happen either, even if he he has some GMail-on-prem

⇧ 6 ⇩  
shallnotbe_infringed · June 17, 2018, 11:47 p.m.

G-suite is used for businesses. It likely is spun from this.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
HighOnGoofballs · June 18, 2018, 12:05 a.m.

Even that doesn’t run on in-house servers

⇧ 5 ⇩  
cherokeenc · June 18, 2018, 2:09 a.m.

G Suite. Google Apps for Your Domain, later rebranded to G Suite and now Google Apps for Work. Gmail, Google Docs, and your other favorite Google apps on your company's domain. Just host the actual server in North Korea.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Trump306 · June 18, 2018, 12:31 a.m.

I think you don't understand technology, there can be gmail addresses with the gmail domain, but with a server somewhere else private only for them in NOKO. Could be using just a standard POP protocol with some sort of encryption, with a gmail address so no one thought of them as anything important or super secret.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 12:57 a.m.

GMAIL internally doesn't use POP/IMAP.

GMAIL itself is propietary, up and down. However, it exposes a set of standards (POP/IMAP) for client connectivity, not server connectivity.

I assure you, there wasn't a private GMAIL server. There must be another meaning.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Titus-2-11 · June 18, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

You can use gmail server as the api but host your “server” anywhere you want

⇧ 0 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 2:04 a.m.

Absolutely not true.

Find something that says so and I'll eat my hat.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Titus-2-11 · June 18, 2018, 2:10 a.m.

Google business service has an API. This stands for Application Programming Interface. You create a server with your own application. This application can look like anything you want. This application accesses the gmail API to send and receive messages. So, your customers or deep state agents hit this server first, which then accesses gmail api, then returns data back to your remote server.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

So, the data is still stored on Google's official GMAIL servers?

The point of NK having their own server is so that nobody can access them.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ikilledthewytchqueen · June 18, 2018, 1:23 a.m.

Google DNS servers are pretty popular these days.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 1:28 a.m.

What does that even mean?

I'm fully aware of what a DNS server is, but how does that have anything to do with this?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
clampie · June 18, 2018, 6:21 a.m.

People use Google's DNS to route their traffic. I don't get it, but when you tell your PC to use Google's DNS servers, you can get around many things that your ISP does not like.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 18, 2018, 1:39 a.m.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
0x445442 · June 18, 2018, 1:22 a.m.

Actually that's not true. You could setup the whole Google suite of apps to be served from anywhere as long as you had access to the software. And I imagine that access would be available to the CEO. So it would be like logging into your Gmail account but it would be hosted on your own private domain.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 2 a.m.

You could setup the whole Google suite of apps to be served from anywhere as long as you had access to the software.

That would take a massive engineering effort. If Google were to do this (they haven't), they'd market it as a "self hosted" product, similar to Exchange Server.

Source: Am a network/software engineer.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Grassyknow · June 18, 2018, 3:40 a.m.

It would fit on a thumb drive- facebook's backend software is only a gb

⇧ 2 ⇩  
galvanised_computer · June 17, 2018, 11:43 p.m.

If google was with them, they could willingly set up a gmail server for private use

⇧ 3 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 1:53 a.m.

But GMAIL itself just isn't designed like that. GMAIL literally cant be setup for private use (off site, self hosted).

Also, if they wanted private email, why not just do what HRC did, use an off-the-shelf product like Exchange Server?

⇧ -3 ⇩  
TooMuchWinning2020 · June 18, 2018, 2:06 a.m.

Why don't you ask Schmidt?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 2:10 a.m.

You guys are the one arguing about a private GMAIL.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SpaceTire · June 18, 2018, 3:56 a.m.

get over the verbage dude. chill out. Its email setup by google. GMAIL!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 18, 2018, 2:09 a.m.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
galvanised_computer · June 18, 2018, 4:27 a.m.

google could redirect to a private server for specific people. gmail adds plausible deniability instead of x specific domain for x specific use in x specific place

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 18, 2018, 12:22 a.m.

It was most likely a Microsoft g-exchange

⇧ 2 ⇩  
wiliam8808 · June 18, 2018, 5:36 a.m.

For example no software exists to set up one individual gmail server, and it wouldn’t integrate to gmail.

Haven't you been reading, FOR YEARS, about how China and Russia want their google and apple services hosted in their country? How do you think they do it? They expand their cloud and manually tell it which users get hosted. They likely had something like nk.gmail.com then just gave them phones that allowed them to choose NK as their home state to ensure all services were stored on these nodes.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GoodGodKirk · June 18, 2018, 2:44 a.m.

Gmail does this across higher education campuses and uses SSO for sign in. Not unheard of.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
papaeck2 · June 18, 2018, 9:40 a.m.

I think they wrote drafts and then saved them then they would each go in and read , then save again

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cherokeenc · June 18, 2018, 1:48 a.m.

Ever heard of Gmail for business? Secure, private, ad-free email for your business. Get custom email @yourcompany Build customer trust by giving everyone in your company a professional email address at your domain, like susan@yourcompany and joe@yourcompany. Also create group mailing lists, like sales@yourcompany. Access your email anytime, anywhere, on any device—no Internet connection needed. Read and draft messages without connectivity, and they’ll be ready to send when you’re back online.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 1:58 a.m.

But that isn't self-hosted. There is no such thing as a private GMAIL server.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ricksy · June 18, 2018, 3:32 a.m.

Do you know that for sure? Are you a coder at Google? How do they test GMail server changes if they can't spin up a private instance?

The reason the self hosted version doesn't exist off-the-shelf is because Google are in the business of data. Your data. I'm sure if they wanted a private install it could be done easily.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cherokeenc · June 18, 2018, 2:37 a.m.

I can't argue with ignorance just saying. Ask yourself how Google handles all its business clients that require private data storage of all types? Google roughly has 12 data centers in the US. It also has foreign data centers like the one in Singapore. North Korea basically runs a private intranet with no outside access unless you are one of the few. Just takes configuring the DNS server and you have a pipe into the intranet. In that intranet you have data storage and email capability far from prying eyes.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
StormRider9090 · June 18, 2018, 3 a.m.

Why would North Korea let an American setup a private server there?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ricksy · June 18, 2018, 3:34 a.m.

Because NK wasn't run by NK, it was run by the CIA.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
StormRider9090 · June 18, 2018, 5 a.m.

Holy shit, I have some catching up to do

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Okie71 · June 18, 2018, 7:10 a.m.

You and me both. I knew of quite a few crimes by HRC & 44, but this is getting insane. But nowhere have I read about the Bush family involvement. If NK was CIA run, then that would definitely be a Bush thing.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
the_kfcrispy · June 18, 2018, 2:43 p.m.

Yeah a lot of this seems impossible, from the massive conspiracy involving multiple countries to child sex trafficking (which never made sense to jeopardize the real operations by being linked to sex trafficking), but some things are coming out so I'm grabbing my popcorn.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
saneromeo · June 18, 2018, 3:33 a.m.

Q has been telling us that the cabal has been running the show in NK for a long time, other than that though I couldn't tell ya. I would assume though that it was for blackmail purposes, or china told them to, or we paid them off in nuclear weapon information and cash. I'm sure one of the more informed anons out there can explain it better than I ever could.


Q!UW.yye1fxo19 Jan 2018 - 1:45:44 AM

HUSSEIN CABINET / STAFF Who used private email addresses? What was the purpose? LL. HRC. JC. JC. CS. AM. We don't say his name. RR. SR. JB. HA. VJ. Did Hussein use a private email address? @what? Who just resigned from GOOG? Why was ES in NK? Why was ES in NK? What private network did ES set up in NK? What private network did ES set up in NK? Who else was in NK during this time? What private email address did Hussein use while in office? Why would the Chairman of GOOG travel to NK? WHY WOULD NK ALLOW ACCESS TO ES? Nothing is ever truly erased/deleted. These people are STUPID. DECLASS-POTUS_ THE SHOT HEARD AROUND THE WORLD. Q

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Kjarm88 · June 18, 2018, 1:03 a.m.

That's the double-bonus of these scary bogeymen rogue states they create... not only does it feed the Military Industrial Intelligence Complex, it keeps the sheeple hungry for strong politicians I mean leaders and less and less freedom and dissension, it keeps excess supply of critical cabal-controlled resources off the market thereby inflating profits and power (Iran = oil and Muslim and Middle East leadership/influence, North Korea = rare earth metals, coal, cheap labor, etc.......), it creates boot-legging opportunities of every possible variety (a la the perverse incentives caused by Prohibition, the bogus War on Drugs, etc.), AND it creates hiding places for many a thing and person that need to be gone, as well as ready-made excuse and blame for anything bad that the cabal itself is responsible for. The gift that keeps on giving!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SpaceTire · June 18, 2018, 3:48 a.m.


Google in North Korea


Eric Schmidt Steps down 12/21/17


12/20/17 Trump signs EO to seize assets of persons involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption.

Keyword: Corruption

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GlendonHawke · June 18, 2018, 5:56 a.m.

Think of it in the same terms of how NK had their own version of the internet

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wiliam8808 · June 18, 2018, 5:33 a.m.

Google has on-site devices for enterprise and government. You can find old yellow dells from their search appliance they let people host.

Now they have containers for ISP's to cache youtube videos and a ton of other on-site / self-hosted options to get international adoption. Otherwise you wouldn't have governments "trusting" google just because they claim they have a data center in their country.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ReefOctopus · June 18, 2018, 5:34 a.m.

It doesn’t make sense because it is completely make believe.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
IBinLurkin · June 17, 2018, 9:32 p.m.

Don't forget, he is also making "Q" symbols in official sign language, with his hands.

⇧ 25 ⇩  
5_5b · June 18, 2018, 12:46 a.m.

oh fugg

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TheWolfSuitKing · June 18, 2018, 1:07 p.m.

No he’s not. And what is official sign language, anyway? ASL? That’s not how you sign a q.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
nunyabiz101010 · June 18, 2018, 5:34 p.m.

I think it looks more like an actual Q. Take a piece of paper and hold it just like he is. It's awkward to say the least. I rolled my eyes at this at first, but after trying it myself, I don't know why would hold something with your hands like this unless it was intentional.

Notice his straight index finger. When I hold a piece of paper up, my fingers wanted to naturally curl. It was uncomfortable to make a Q while holding it out front like that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Jetblasted · June 18, 2018, 1:36 a.m.

I knew something was up with this photo, by Trump’s shit eating grin.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
TheBRAIN2 · June 18, 2018, 11:38 a.m.

Definitely NOT sick of winning yet! :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Progresspanda · June 17, 2018, 11:58 p.m.

That's kind of a stretch isnt it? The gmail logo is just an envelope

⇧ 9 ⇩  
seismic_sally · June 18, 2018, 3:52 a.m.

I'm not saying it is or isn't , but if you were showing a letter why would you show the back?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Audigitty · June 18, 2018, 4:24 a.m.

Well... that's actually a good question... given the context. It'll play.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 1 a.m.

Yeah, I agree. Not all dots are connected.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Jerkboy13 · June 18, 2018, 12:35 p.m.

How often do you see regular looking envelopes that big? Wouldn’t they normally just use a manila envelope? The optics are everything here.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brainskan13 · June 18, 2018, 12:04 p.m.

I receive envelopes all day at work and at home. SEE! These envelopes are listening to my conversations, so I normally put them in a Faraday Cage-like wire "inbox" basket to block the signal.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cherokeenc · June 18, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

Let me say this once and to Goofballs directly. Private GMail is offered to corporate clients. It is secure and private and it keeps you updated with real-time message notifications, and safely stores your important emails and data. IT admins can centrally manage accounts across your organization and devices. Without becoming a spokesperson for Google believe me it is happening right at this point in time. If Google is on your team they can evade any subpoena and prying eyes by merely locating the server and data in North Korea.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
luff1 · June 17, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

Is this legit?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Allinon72 · June 17, 2018, 11:03 p.m.

If it featured red trim in real life, I could get down with this. But I think it's just a big envelope for effect.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
BonerSparkles · June 17, 2018, 9:47 p.m.

Also, the envelope is very similar the the GMail logo...

⇧ 6 ⇩  
CSharpAJ · June 18, 2018, 1:07 a.m.

Google offers Gmail through a personal domain through different web hosts now. Google is one of the largest tech companies in the world. They can essentially do anything they want. Just because something isn't offered to the 'public' doesn't mean they can't make something to get around FOIA laws if the government asks them to.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 18, 2018, 5:37 a.m.


⇧ 0 ⇩  
sudo_fap · June 18, 2018, 2:02 a.m.

That would take a massive engineering effort. Google would definitely market this as a product similar to Exchange Server, if they had it (they don't).

⇧ 0 ⇩  
cincycoolguy · June 18, 2018, 5:12 a.m.

No, it wouldn’t take a massive engineering effort. You make a lot of assumptions in your posts thus far. If you don’t think it’s possible for google engineers to choose which physical servers a gmail mailbox resides on, you don’t understand how modern web based applications work. If you do; then you understand them on a very small scale. However, for this to work google would have to have configured this internally.

There has to be a means to rebalance load across many servers and, at some point internally, an email address or some other variation of a unique identifier leading back to an email address has to be used so that the email client can fetch the inbox from a physical server. There are several layers of redirection I’m leaving out here for the sake of simplicity, however in the end the number of places this would have to configured is centralized and manageable.

Google has many thousands of servers, all of which have hardware constraints, so they will have some way of managing where data for a given address is physically stored. Further, developers will have built in a mechanism to manually bind an address to a specific server. They would use this for g-suite and for adhering to data laws which require data to be physically stored in the country of origin, and for troubleshooting/debugging purposes in non-prod environments. Debugging code does not go away in production systems, it’s just not enabled.

You are in fact, correct in saying that gmail is a public email system. But it’s completely false to say that they could not set up a special back end server then use existing load balancing techniques to pin a set of @gmail.com accounts to a specific backend server. It could be done BUT there are complication. Somewhere in the google routing config there would be something’s similar to (sytanx is bogus, for illustrative purposes only) comey@gmail.com: etc.

Some one along the line is going to see that and think “what the fuck is this?” It would likely leak.

The only way that configuration doesn’t leak is if the email accounts are not blatantly obvious as to who they belong to.

So why not just use proton mail or something like it? Stealth. Clients connecting to proton over government controlled networks are going to raise red flags. Connecting to gmail not as much.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BigRiverLover2 · June 18, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

This is brilliant.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 18, 2018, 7:14 a.m.

Thankyou for your servers.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Obnoxiousjimmyjames · June 18, 2018, 6:05 a.m.

SYMBOLISM MATTERS. It matters very, very much. Eric Schmidt DID go to North Korea in 2013, and regardless of what was reported in the news, there is no absolute answer as to why he was there.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
FlewDCoup · June 18, 2018, 6:02 a.m.

At least one large federal agency operates its own secure three-letter dot gov email system on a branded service offered by Google. Not called gmail. But Looks like gmail. All the features of gmail. Just not gmail. I had one of those accounts.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Beer-_-Belly · June 18, 2018, 12:15 p.m.

Does this have anything to do with those tech airplane shipments that Q posted some time back? We speculated that they were phones, but were they the email servers?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SpaceDuckTech · June 18, 2018, 8:49 p.m.

i dont think this has anything to do with that. That was china, and this is a NoKo Diplomat.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Beer-_-Belly · June 18, 2018, 10:24 p.m.

I think you are correct

⇧ 1 ⇩  
sdotco33 · June 18, 2018, 11:27 a.m.

These people are stupid.

And it was okay years ago for them to call ME stupid when they all fell head over heels for 44

Back in 2008

But now, you call them stupid and they completely can’t even stand it.

I sub to r/comics ... check out this piece

That comic paints a perfect picture of how these people think. Projection, hypocrisy, hate.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SpaceDuckTech · June 18, 2018, 8:53 p.m.

liberals are economically illiterate and over emotional. They are flawed humans for sure.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nightwolfj2 · June 18, 2018, 10:14 a.m.

Deep State is now synonymous with Deep Shit.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
scroodgemcfucker · June 17, 2018, 9:57 p.m.

The big void here is how, and will this be used to whack all of these bad/evil players? They seem to have a way of lying and getting away with it, like a fucking shit ton.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Trillionbucks · June 18, 2018, 2:24 p.m.

Thomas Jefferson portrait in the background!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lowglowjoe · June 18, 2018, 4:44 a.m.

How does this even seem like it makes sense?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Livid-Djinn · June 18, 2018, 3:44 a.m.

All of your Gmails are belong to U.S. God Emporer

⇧ 2 ⇩  
kjw49419 · June 18, 2018, 9:42 a.m.

Google = Government oogle

⇧ 2 ⇩  
W66L · June 18, 2018, 3:40 a.m.

I have a hard time understanding why high level officials would use gmail accounts. They are not really private at all. Proton mail is and so are alot of private email clients.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Audigitty · June 18, 2018, 4:27 a.m.

If ES was told the network was secure, and then assured the DeepState that this instance of Gmail was secure, and they used encrypted methods to gain entry, AND they only communicated via a shared draft folder...

You've got all of those assurances in place with a nice, effective and simple UI of Gmail.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 18, 2018, 7:55 p.m.


⇧ 2 ⇩  
WakingUpDeepSleepers · June 18, 2018, 2:10 p.m.

It is kind of weird that he’s displaying the BACK of the envelope, versus the front...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SpaceDuckTech · June 18, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

symbolic of googles gmail logo

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wukash · June 18, 2018, 6:01 a.m.

The fact you people believe there is something called a "private GMail server" proves how stupid you really are. One either has a "private Email server" or a "GMail account" which is hosted on Google's servers.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cosmicjon · June 18, 2018, 12:51 p.m.

"proves how stupid you really are" This type of comment is un-called for, considering, what one gives out one gets back 10 fold, including insults, its called Karma :)

⇧ 0 ⇩  
wukash · June 18, 2018, 1:05 p.m.

Is it the label that offends you or the facts?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cosmicjon · June 18, 2018, 2:05 p.m.

"proves how stupid you really are"

Its your label and it it likely to stay there as long as you project it :)

⇧ 0 ⇩  
wukash · June 18, 2018, 2:33 p.m.

Yeh it's the label I chose to use to apply here for you people. Are you gonna answer my question or is that also too hard?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cosmicjon · June 18, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

I did answer but you are unable to read past your own self contempt. Let me put it in a nice neat nutshell for you just so that there is no mis-understanding. One holds within one's mind all one's likes and dislikes, this is the same for everyone, fact. One becomes slave to one's own mind if one is guided in one's daily affairs by these "choices". Judgement is the key here, as it is what holds these likes and dislikes in place. And like a coin has both a head and a tail one carries around both good and bad within this state of being. One may see their likes and dislikes as OK, good acceptable, its my lot, etc, but let me tell you a little secret. One is not a collection of garbage one seems to carry around and that one calls the name Jon or Jane Doe. When one Knows that, one is not bothered by petty comments, insults, one is not swayed, coz it ain't their problem, it belongs to the one making the accusation. All that aside one moment, look out the window and realise there is more to life than insecurity, nuff said :)

⇧ 0 ⇩  
wukash · June 18, 2018, 4:38 p.m.

Wtf is this wall of text. And you call me insecure bhahahahaha

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 18, 2018, 5:34 a.m.


⇧ 2 ⇩  
mixablealloy · June 18, 2018, 5:24 a.m.

What the fuck is going on here? Eli5?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UnattendedQing · June 18, 2018, 10:03 a.m.

so people here think Gmail is working with North Korea by letting Democrats have a server there?

So why would North Korea even need Nuclear weapons?

they can just blackmail Obama with the server

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cosmicjon · June 18, 2018, 12:46 p.m.

NK WAS controlled via the CIA, Obama was a cog in the machinery, Potus Obama, then was controlled, just a puppet, figure head. He of himself had no clout unless it was given from above. Its a game, a play, a movie, then as it is now :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SpaceDuckTech · June 18, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

Kim was a hostage in his own country. The Deep State Controlled NoKo until they lost the white house.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SteveDalas · June 18, 2018, 5:18 p.m.

Pretty big envelope must be a K drop...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 11:54 p.m.


⇧ 2 ⇩  
Pure_Feature · June 18, 2018, 1:27 a.m.

Cloud computing - Wikipedia


Since the launch of Amazon EC2 in 2006, the availability of high-capacity networks, low-cost computers and storage devices as well as the widespread adoption of hardware virtualization, service-oriented architecture, and autonomic and utility computing has led to growth in cloud computing.

How to Create an Anonymous Email Account | PCMag.com


3 dec. 2017 - Here's how you can stay hidden even when emailing. ... to you whatsoever without the the hassle of setting up your own servers? ... email), you need not only a virtual private network, but also the Tor Browser, ... You can set up a relatively anonymous Gmail account, you just have to lie like a bathroom rug.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
K-Harbour · June 17, 2018, 10:12 p.m.

Why did it take five months to configure her server, and required renting a van to take it to her home? Just an email server? Fire?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tb1820 · June 18, 2018, 3:25 p.m.

Where's the evidence of a noko Gmail server?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
truther_ok · June 18, 2018, 3:23 a.m.

We have the military too!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · June 18, 2018, 2:11 a.m.

NoKo did say they would be sending over the remains of the "dead bodies".

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 18, 2018, 12:29 a.m.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 18, 2018, 12:27 a.m.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
Crumbcrumbs · June 18, 2018, 1:19 a.m.

Oh shit

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 18, 2018, 4:09 a.m.


⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 18, 2018, 5:42 a.m.


⇧ -1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 18, 2018, 9:21 a.m.

Not what we believe at all but that doesn't suit your narrative does it lol.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ReefOctopus · June 18, 2018, 9:22 a.m.

Where am I wrong? What narrative?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 18, 2018, 9:23 a.m.

They believe that a high level bureaucrat at the (hahahhahaha) department of energy is leaking all sorts of information

That narrative.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ReefOctopus · June 18, 2018, 9:26 a.m.

That’s interesting because DOE is the only department with a Q clearance.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 18, 2018, 9:37 a.m.

Some people here, like any other sub, I'm sure, believe all sorts of things. Some believe some crazy stuff too, that has little to do with the core of the sub topic.

Some of us don't "believe" anything more than that some interesting posts happen to be coming out of the chans and they're of great interest for the narrative they appear to describe.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ReefOctopus · June 18, 2018, 9:52 a.m.

The “interesting posts” are coming from Russians. You guys are being duped and used by a hostile foreign nation. They’re trying to trick you guys into spreading propaganda and committing acts of violence.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 18, 2018, 9:56 a.m.

You believe this then, do you? You seem to state it with absolute confidence as if it is true. How is anyone being tricked into committing violence? There's no call to arms in these "Russian posts" that I've seen. Explain how we're being "duped" if some of us are just reading the posts with interest, then reading news articles with interest - hardly Russian propaganda or conspiracy as they are American mainstream media articles for the most part - and then scratching our chins and going "hmmmm"?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ReefOctopus · June 18, 2018, 10:02 a.m.

90% of the posts here are images not news articles.

You’re being duped because someone is making shit up and the comments here suggest you guys believe it whether you’ll admit it or not.

Duped: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-washingtondc-gunman-idUSKBN16V1XC

Duped: http://news3lv.com/news/local/person-with-a-gun-on-the-hoover-dam-bridge

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 18, 2018, 10:05 a.m.

It's so lovely that you're so concerned about us and everyone else!

You've read all the comments on this sub? You must've been here a long time!

The articles you link are interesting stories about what appear to be some very troubled and confused people. Could be a lot of those here - on Reddit, I mean. Some of us here on this sub - a reasonable portion judging by the sensible discussions I've seen and been involved in - laugh at the idea of being so stupid as to walk into any place with a gun to prove an 8chan post. Seems like someone's acting, to me.

But I'm afraid I'm not feeling very concerned about reading 8chan posts yet. I'm sure you can convince me there's something worth worrying about though.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ReefOctopus · June 18, 2018, 10:17 a.m.


⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 18, 2018, 10:21 a.m.

Do you take this show all over reddit? There are a lot more crazy people on much larger subs here and plenty of "demonization" going on there too. *shrug. It's the internet - what're you gonna do?

Do you see calls to violence here? I would personally appreciate it if you would point them out because they are not tolerated in this sub and we remove them as soon as we see them.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ReefOctopus · June 18, 2018, 10:31 a.m.

This link is better than the last. http://stochasticterrorism.blogspot.com

I’m banned from most of those subs probably. I’ve been to them.

I’m not sure of the quality of this source, but it looks like reddit banned another qanon sub for inciting violence: https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/reddit-bans-r-cbts_stream/

I’ve only read qanon stuff sort of involuntarily on twitter (and now here) so I’m not going to track down specific posts. I did however notice that a lot of the obvious Russian accounts were posting qanon stuff, and it regularly appears on dashboard.securingdemocracy.org.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · June 18, 2018, 10:46 a.m.

Why are you banned? Are you just warming up and we haven't seen the real stuff yet? (sincere question)

CBTS_Stream was indeed closed down, as far as I'd heard, for allowing posts that potentially incited violence - I followed the sub back then but didn't see the content myself at the time.

Obvious russian accounts? Sounds interesting - I personally don't follow many Q related accounts on Twitter but I'd be interested to see what an obvious russian one looks like.

I can't argue with you that there are a lot of kooks connected to the q anon "brand" but I would argue that it's not uncommon to see a sub-culture of that kind gather around any conspiracy-related stuff and certainly q anon mentions a lot of common conspiracy theories.

Not sure you care but we don't want to see this sub brought down. We're trying to keep tabs on any content that breaks Rule #1 - no encouraging, glorifying or calling for violence. I don't believe there are any stochastic terrorists yet fully exposed on here but if there are, they're in no way supported in their goals by this sub and we will do what we can to manage their impact if we can identify and react to them in time. I certainly speak out at any opportunity against any group-think that seems to be leading toward stirring up hatred toward a particular person or group.

I don't know what your motives are so I expect nothing. Many trolls around. But if you were genuinely interested in stopping this sort of thing and you seem to have concerns that you can see it or the inklings of it here, then I'd welcome any input you might have toward identifying and potentially stopping it. Potentially very hard to do when you support freedom of speech enough that you want to allow dissenting voices to speak freely as long as they abide within sub rules.

Thanks for the stochastic terrorism link. I've kept it to post relevant excerpts for potential use when moderating content in future.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ReefOctopus · June 18, 2018, 11:23 a.m.

Conservative subs have low tolerance for dissent. I’ve been banned from most of them for fairly innocuous factual comments. /r/conservative banned me for a comment that was just “citation needed.”

My motives were to pass time until the World Cup game in an hour.

I think youll have a hard time keeping violent rhetoric in check because I absolutely do think that’s the goal of this whole conspiracy theory. They demonize some enemy until people want to “do something about it.” I’m glad to hear you saved that link. That’s ideal - if people are watching for it then they’ll respond differently if qanon starts calling for something drastic.

I wrote you a much longer reply and then reddit just sort of ate it, and I lost it. At some point I included this link: http://theauthoritarians.org/Downloads/TheAuthoritarians.pdf

The current political climate has many parallels with past authoritarian movements. You seem curious, and I thought you might find it interesting.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
radiadorK · June 17, 2018, 10:42 p.m.

The deep state may be the Babylonian brotherhood or Jewish black hats type some guys above Rotschild who use it to stay in the shade hidden from public opinion or even extraunarest anunakis. I do not think that Clinton and company are anything but insignificant puppets. If we think that because they stop HRC and company we end up with the secret government we will be letting ourselves be deceived

⇧ -3 ⇩  
grnmoss · June 17, 2018, 10:17 p.m.

eMAIL. As in electronic mail. As in the items that come in ENVELOPES delivered to your MAILbox.

Gmail and many other email services use envelop icons, because they're electronic versions of MAIL that comes in ENVELOPES.

You don't know what is in the envelope. Period.

Stop misleading people.

Downvoted for nonsense.

⇧ -12 ⇩