LIVE Baking Seminar

10/08/2020

We in here

Welcome To LIVE Baking Classes in the Q Research Utility Kitchen

We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

We are the bakers who provide the breads for those anons who post Qresearch's open-sourced information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of baking ideas and baking ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.

=VINCIT OMNIA VERITAS=

=SEMPER FIDELIS=

=WWG1WGA=

INTRO TO BAKING

Qresearch is a 24/7 beehive of activity where anons post their diggs, memes and prayers.

For this to happen requires ''bakers''–which is why they have been called "the core of this board."

Bakers perform several key functions:

* Set the tone for each bread via their choice of bread title and /comms/ with posters.

* Post notables for each bread.

* Bake breads (transition the board from one thread to the next).

* Knead the dough (keeping the resource pages clean, tidy, and up-to-date).

When all goes well, baking is a fun & exciting opportunity to serve. When things get wonky and shills attack–bakers carry on anyway.

Shadilay, fellow bakers!

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

General Announcements

* Baking Class in /comms/ every Thursday @7pm ET: practice baking, Q&A, all are welcome

* Baking class plan (so any baker can teach) >>11969, https://pastebin.com/gqfunWCR

* How to bake a baking seminar dough >>14289

* Too many threads problem - bakers be(a)ware >>15895

* Q-bin links qanonbin.com (vanwa), www2qanonbin.com (bitmitigate)

Past Class links & archives

Links: >>6125 #1, >>6368 #2, >>6885 #3, >>7185 #4 , >>7568 #5, >>8274 #6, >>8872 #7, >>9320 #8, >>9787 #9, >>10510 #10, >>11086 #11, #12 >>11733, #13 >>13041, #14 >>13590, #15 >>14290, #16 >>14873, #17 >>15341, #18 >>15918, #19 >>16885, #20 >>17719, #21 >>18289, #22 >>18935, #23 >>19692, #24 >>20544, #25 >>21322, #26 >>21883, #27 >>22537, #28 >>23071, #29 >>23470, #30 >>24025, #31 >>24695, #32 >>25718, #33 >>27149

Archives: Classes #1 - #20: >>18934, #21 http://archive.vn/wip/NH1Ss, #22 http://archive.vn/olnuG, #23 http://archive.vn/enwhP, #24 https://8kun.top/comms/res/20544.html, #25 http://archive.vn/wip/AWhVb, #26 http://archive.vn/wip/3oSig, #27 https://archive.vn/wip/X39j1, #28 https://archive.vn/fBJjQ, #29 https://archive.vn/wip/kwjiX, #30 https://archive.vn/wip/rwdjs, #31 https://archive.vn/wip/NrROI, #32 https://archive.vn/wip/v9PuU

Step-by-Step Baking Instructions

>>17783 STEP 0 - Preparation

>>17797 STEP 1 - Find the Current Dough

>>17803 STEP 2 - Copy the Current Dough

>>17807 STEP 3 - Paste The Dough Into Text Editor ( >>17810 dough in Q-bin)

>>17815 STEP 3a - Trim The Notables Section

>>17822 STEP 3b - Make space for your New Notables

>>17831 STEP 4 - Create A New Thread

>>17837 STEP 5 - Enter Thread Info And Post Thread

>>17845 STEP 6 - Enter the Rest of the Dough

>>17863 STEP 7 - Make A New Pastebin & Make The Dough Post ( >>17868, >>17871, >>17875 Q-bin updates)

>>17876 STEP 8 - Post Your New Thread Link

Baking Overview & Extras

>>17777 Overview

>>17884 Linking between Boards

>>17894 Timing

>>14523 Baker's Tools Lite

>>26068 How to Baker When Q Posts UPDATE >>26089, >>26110, >>26124, >>26146, >>26165, >>2617o

>>23326 Baking from the Index NEW

E-BAKE Instructions

>>9252, >>10776

New Baker Checklist

>>31574 Eight step plus a summary

Updated Notables Module

>>24091 Updated notables module (intro)

>>24147 Notables overview/baker's considerations

>>24165 Notables overview/baker's considerations

>>24287 Types of possible notables

>>24301 What makes a perfect notable?

>>24314 How to log notables in your dough

>>24319 When to post notables updates in-thread

>>24394 Recap & question time

Da Dough WorkshopNEW

>>25914 DA Dough

>>25920 Role that Bakers Play

>>25928 New Bakers & Da Dough

>>25972 Summing UP Da Dough

Handoffs workshopNEW

>>28909 Four steps in a handoff and how to pickup a ghost bake

BAKING RESOURCES

Baker's grab bag

* Baker's Tools app (Version 0.7.2) Baker Tools v0.7.2: >>9584, >>9597, >>9601 https://pastebin.com/L1p6iRzZ

* Baker's Tools Lite (stripped down, good for baking) >>14523, https://pastebin.com/pUVCTeCG

* NEW Updated Baker's Tools Lite (q.js) >>21036, https://github.com/learnedtocode/qjs

* Try Atom as a text editor for Macs >>6925, >>6934, >>7055, >>7070

* Meme-making app kek.gg >>8771

* Crazy Bakes: wonky board, lags, baking from Index, "flood detected", dup breads >>9960

* How's your mouse for baking? >>10617

* Font used for baking school slides >>10642, https://www.dafontfree.net/find.php?q=impact

* Quik Pic bake instructions >>7549

* Original baking video >>7076 (shows how to make room for new notables)

* Overcoming paywalls >>10844

* Pastebin.com problems & alternatives >>11645, >>11609, >>11619, >>11620, >>11627, >>11640

* How to Control-F on androids & IOS devices >>13566, >>13567

* How to do a keyword search when /qresearch/ is down >>13696

* Past bread archive for /qresearch/: https://qanon.news/Archives

Dealing with notables

* Note-taking roles: baker, note collector, helper anon, posters >>14921

* Ten Baker Tips for Notables >>8177

* Bakers on what they look for in notables >>8351, >>8315, >>8698

* Muh Collector "how to" on notables >>9006, >>9009

* Anon tips for better notables >>>/qrb/41937, https://pastebin.com/yq7wQyvn

* Long notables; Asking anons to state main point >>13633, >>8237

* Asking anons to state the main point

* Advanced Google searching protocols https://pastebin.com/raw/JuK0xUDb

• 5 kinds of sauce (evidence) that make a notable noteworthy >>9655

Free image/video screenshots, download, production tools

* Image screenshots PrtSc/snipping tool + MS-Paint https://youtu.be/KvXxCE1gxOE

* 8kun video limits (~16mg) >>8760

* Bandicam Screen Recorder >>8759, >>8762 (also: OBS, Kdenlive, Audacity)

* YouTube & Twitter (downloads plus cutting scenes from YT) >>14306

* Video downloaders: >>14237, https://www.downloadhelper.net/ ; Firefox/Opera: - https://technologyto.com/extractor.html

* VLC Player >>8714, >>8715, >>8766

* Windows Movie Maker for Win 10 >>8712

* NVidia cards (can screen-capture vids) >>8785

* Forensically (forensics magnifier) https://29a.ch/photo-forensics/#forensic-magnifier

* ShotCut NLE (open source cross platform video editor) https://shotcut.org/

* MFFmpeg (decodes & plays any format) https://ffmpeg.org/

* Natron (cross-platform video compositor) https://natrongithub.github.io/

* Handbrake (good for transcoding) https://handbrake.fr/

* GIMP & GMIC (image editing) http://gmic.eu/gimp.shtml

* Invidio (copies YT vids, restricted or not, no ads or signup) >>8792

* Avidemux.org, VideoSmaller.Com (apps for making large files smaller) >>18286

* Free Convert ((reduces file size w/good quality) https://www.freeconvert.com/video-compressor/download

• NEW: FFmpeg (record, convert and stream audio/video): https://ffmpeg.org/

Baker tips IRL

>>8829 Baker's Tips - Read me first

>>6331 #01 - Ghosting a bred

>>6331 #02 - Baker changes

>>6378 #03 - TOR baking

>>6651 #04 - Defeating shills with facts & humor

>>7339 #05 - Announce you're baking (#11 too)

>>6892 #06 - Baking/note-taking protocols

>>7181 #07 - Use RED TEXT and BOLD in handoffs

>>7363 #08 - Try to notice when a cat is baking

>>13038 #09 - Respecting other bakers' notables

>>8174 #10 - Make sure to copypasta the whole page

>>8803 #11 - Announce you're taking responsibility

>>8822 #12 - Embed baker changes to provide more info

>>8824 #13 - Watch out for unknown bakers bearing gifts

>>8825 #14 - Use named pastebins to defeat shill complaints

>>8826 #15 - Responding to shills trying to suck up baker's time

>>8827 #16 - Be aware of muh joos bakers

>>8828 #17 - All bakers screw up

>>10445 #18 - Just do it--bake!

>>9590 #19 - Don't be afraid to bake

>>10789 #20 - Post notes early so changes can be made

>>10791 #21 - No /comms/ creates misunderstandings

>>10792 #22 - Defeat shills with humor

>>14835 #23 - Keep notables [from different bakers] separate

>>14836 #24 - Make sure to ask for Handoff Confirmed

>>14801 #25 - Don't fuck with the wrong baker [take a look - funny]

>>15894 #26 - Ignore end-of-bread antics

Baker stories, discussions & workshops

>>10114 How shills attack bakers - example

>>10787 Picking up a mid-bread bake - LIVE example

>>10710 Why do you bake? >>10729, >>10731, >>10732, >>10744

>>14837 Forensic baking (Mini-study: who's been messing with the dough??)

>>14114 Editing PB notables, ok or not? Baker discussion >>14227, >>14248, >>14265

>>14943 What notables draw your interest and why, baker? >>14947, >>14968, >>14975, >>14983

>>15908 HOW-TO notables (Class #16) w/baker comments >>15032

>>17219, >>17235, >>17241, >>17242, >>17245 Bakers on ghosting

>>17353, >>17362 How to update dough on a phone (<< first two posts, dialog continues….)

>>19732 Ten common "tells" that out new bakers

>>22600 Bakers on SHILLS >>22601, >>22612, >>22613, >>22617, >>22653, >>22643, >>22646, >>22855

>>22537 Funny SHILL memes in Bread #27….scroll thru to enjoy & steal.

>>24230 Use Baker's Tools or Baker's Tools Lite? NEW

>>24958 Top Three Baking Tips NEW >>24970, >>24971, >>24975, >>24984

>>25450, >>25452, >>25453 Baker on handoffs NEW

>>23070 Baker verification mini-seminar, class #23

Baking FAQs

>>20547 Generally

>>22535 The Dough

>>22535 Practice Baking

>>22535 Qanonbin.com NEW

>>20549 Notables

>>20549 Timing Issues

>>20550 Handoffs & baker comms

>>20551 Making Reports, Global Reports

>>20551 Baking

>>20551 Baking Error Messages

>>20552 Common Mistakes

>>20552 Q Bakes, Other Fast Bake

>>20552 Dealing with Shills

dough

https://qanonbin.com/paste/2LUfEa07C

Baking Seminar #35 - Anon Townhall

Welcome everyone.

Usually we meet here to teaching new bakers how to bake and give feedback of practice bakers.

If they are any anons here who came for that purpose, stick around. Because we always have time to help with baking at the end. Or you can sneak in a q if you have one before then.

Tonite, we'll start with something a little different and less technique focused:

Talking about the tradition of baking on Q Research and how baking has changed since Q Research first started.

Because understanding where we have come from helps us understand where we are right now and how we got here.

One or more of us will give brief presentations, but anons can ask q's or make comments anytime. This is pretty open forum, has been since we started late Feb. There are usually several conversations going at once, but we manage.

Just so you know, the tradition in this class that anyone who wants to can namefag. it's kind of essential for presenters but optional for anybody else. Just makes discussion easier.

Will post more info if i have it before class. Look forward to meeting new friends and finding ways to facilitate better comms among all anons, including bakers.

Welcome bakers and non-bakers

Glad you could come.

We meet every week to talk about baking and baking-related stuff like the dough and note-taking.

It's usually pretty fun and relaxing.

Hope today will be the same.

We like it comfy here.

So a few ground rules:'''

1. no spamming

2. no shilling

3. no personal attacks

Stuff like that will earn you a warning

(or an instant ban for blitzkreig style attack)

bans are just around end of class

Today we'll focus on baking in a pretty general way rather than teaching hands-on skills

because it's a TOWN HALL

where the aim is to let bakers and non-bakers

talk together

in hope of figuring out how to bake the best breads we can

for Q, Q+ & the team

Like it says on the dough post, bakers often use names here

makes the discussion easier to follow

you're welcome to 'namefag' or 'anon'

your choice

We usually hang out for a little bit at the start, to let stragglers wander in for a bit.

But often serve some refreshments.

Please enjoy.

I'll unlock the thread is just a couple minutes.

Feel free to bring your own, we also like recipes, ha-ha.

>>32981

uh……

>>32988

It's a great q, LM.

I kinda been asking bakers to be thinking about that.

We can chat about that for a few, and also later.

NB and I so have a few things to present, but as usual, it's good to hang out a little beforehand because people tend to drift in slowly…..

think i'll post this again on new bread also, should be up by now

be right back folks….

here, forgot to namefag

>>32993

Kind of long to read, anon.

But tx for your contribution.

o7

>>32999

AMA?

hope ya did catch the rona

>>33003

That would be great.

But can i do a little bit on the history stuff first?

It's not long.

I was just waiting to see if we had some more visitors.

But of course, not all of them speak up!

anybody here for the first time? (and wanna admit it haha)?

>>33006

good to see you, gb

hope you're doing well

plz get some refreshments

got any to share??

>>33008

welcome, prayer anon.

For me, prayers are the most powerful thing we do.

We're going start with a little background

but if you want practical techniques, can share them later.

You can also ask specific q's about baking as we go along.

>>32998

Teach, you think we should get started yet or wait a few?

>>33013

wow.

hate to dox, but where do you live?

>>33012

listen friend

as long as you stay "frenly"

you can remain

them's the rules

got it?

>>33016

TY.

Hope many anons are lurking and watching.

Whoever is here now is here

But anons can also come here later

to see what was said

and why

Comments welcome after class as well

>>33019

Completely up to you.

>>33021

ok then, let's start.

I'm gonna start with a very brief presentation about changes i've seen in baking over the last coupla years'''

nb our usual class teacher will then talk about why he started the baking class

after that, we can address other questions & concerns

but you can jump in any time w/ questions or comments

[doesn't not apply to shills, sorry]

i know a lot of anons are concerned about what's happening

right now on the board

and we can talk about that too

just wanna start by providing some historical context

for that discussion

8chan bakers vs qresearch bakers

when i first came, a lot of bakers were "8chan' bakers

• gruff

• terse

• just-the-facts-ma'm

• "baker does it all" (note-taker GFTOutta the kitch)

• my-way-or-the-hwy guy

i was told by someone when i first baked that i should aim to have fewer than 10 posts per bake

gradually baking changed bc Q focus on unity, etc."

• mild/calm

• playful'

• frenly

• "baker fam/Q fam" idea

• cooperative

• communicative8chan bakers vs qresearch bakers

when i first came, a lot of bakers were "8chan' bakers

• gruff

• terse

• just-the-facts-ma'm

• "baker does it all" (note-taker GFTOutta the kitch)

• my-way-or-the-hwy guy

i was told by someone when i first baked that i should aim to have fewer than 10 posts per bake

but anons didn't always like that style

maybe good for /pol/

but /qr/ is different

because of Q

and what he represents

>>33026

Sounds like you are something of a skeptic, baker.

That's ok, as long as you're willing listen with an open mind.

We can agree to disagree.

But we're here to talk not to fight.

There are obviously other places for that.

No problem.

>>33028

sorry somehow screwed that up a little

let me repost:

8chan bakers vs qresearch bakers

when i first came, a lot of bakers were "8chan' bakers

• gruff

• terse

• just-the-facts-ma'm

• "baker does it all" (note-taker GFTOutta the kitch)

• my-way-or-the-hwy guy

i was told by someone when i first baked that i should aim to have fewer than 10 posts per bake

but anons didn't always like that style

maybe good for /pol/

but /qr/ is different

because of Q

and what he represents

gradually baking changed bc Q focus on unity, etc."

• mild/calm

• playful'

• frenly

• "baker fam/Q fam" idea

• cooperative

• communicative

now generally, most bakers:

• talk more to anons

• are less "do-it-all" (they work w/note-takers)

• try to answer q's

• often ask anons to 'check notables'

• often ask "in or out" on dicey notables

doesn't mean we're perfect, but we do try

When NB mentioned the possibility of starting a new LIVE baking class, he said he thought mebbe it was a crazy idea.

But why not give it a try?

I didn't know but said I would try to help. So I mostly maintain the dough, act as greeter, and teach the classes when he's not available.

i really enjoy it.

to me, they not only support new bakers

but also help 'old' bakers get back into the swing of things

and the thread serves as a place that new bakes canask q's and get bakes checked between classes

NB, r u ready to rock?

>>33034

this is spam

yep, it'll be removed and the poster banned for the duration of class

sorry.

if you ip hop, i'll do it again.

this ain't the Portland riots, we don't take a knee here.

>>33043

>>33043

You're asking whether this is spam?

One is ok.

But stuff like this needs to be part of a discussion- where you say something and then use a cap to support it.

i banned the other stuff because he has spammed it many times over along - along with all kinds of other stuff.

It's almost certainly OSS

and unfortunately, he is not a friend of this board.

>>33046

This is not ok.

I'm gonna remove both of em.

You can stay if you can resist posting this stuff further.

>>33059

This session is optional.

You don't have to stay.

>>33049

Yes, not a cake walk. But manageable with practice. There are also bu bakers to help on most shifts. Nowadays we even see them on graveyard (sometimes, kek).

>>33041

the bakers who left after I started baking left, i think, because of fj. nobody liked per post capchas and the anti "bakers's union" campaign gradually took its toll. It wasn't much fun to bake at that point.

>>33044

that's really interesting, tx.

i've often heard oldfag anons lament that we no longer have intriguing puzzles to solve like at the start

seems like it was kind of demoralizing to some for a while

in winter (mostly feb) 2019, Q posted "we are the news" at least 20x. Kind of a hint that something was changing.

>>33051

see my remarks on wearethenews here:

>>33076

It's coz Q wanted it for this board. Needed it, i think. I was collecting the MSM articles on Q, and it was obvious that virtually every traditional news outlet was comp'd. Something needed to take its place, at least in the short run. That "something" was apparently /qresearch/.

>>33026

You do raise an interesting question - one i never thought of before.

What exactly IS a bakers' union?

When FJ was claiming "bakers union", it was obviously be he hated bakers and used the term pejoratively. like it was something really bad, like the teamsters under hoffa, kek.

But the way you're using it, sounds more like a group thats' a definite group, as opposed to individuals doing the same thing. If so, that could be a good thing or a bad thing. Just depends why the group is a group - and whether it open or closed to more "members."

If you want to call the traditional bakers a group, that seems fine. But if so, we're a very open group. The only two real qualifications for membership are the abilities to

a. bake

b. getting along with other bakers

And the second qualification can be very liberally interpreted.

KEK.

>>33065

Your "point" has been made - and spammed - over and over again on qr.

And it not part of the current discussion.

I said at the start that we'd talk about the current state of the board later, but you couldn't wait. And now you just wanna name call bakers. Not what we do in a thread like this. Take it to /bakers meta/ next door or back to /qr/. Doesn't belong here.

>>33070

Yes.

That's why it's important for new bakers to look carefully at how things are done, espec. on page 2 of the dough. I've probably talked about the needs of aggregators like 50x, but somehow it's hard to get that point across.

Might be worth putting in as a GLOBAL NOTABLE for a while, so new bakers would see it over and over again.

>>33077

>>33088

If you guys are gonna argue about this, please go to /bakers meta/. You'll feel right at home there.

You are not being singled out. We ALWAYS ASK FOR THIS from all bakers.

If you're gonna stay here, stay cause you want to focus on baking and how to bake America Great Again.

>>33087

gb, plz leave it.

and tell us why you note-take.

we lov ya, man, and are here for ya always.

>>33089

>basically double-dog dared me to bake

think if we double-dog dare anons to bake, they'll go forit?

;-}

>>33092

one of the difficulties right now is the idea that "anons chose OSS"

it's more like

"shills and bots (any BO) chose OSS"

So he can take a "vote" and win

because shills jump in

Now, anything that has noted been voted on (which is 99% of what's in the dough) is seen as invalid. Can't get this class thread updated for example - when i asked for that, some shill asked whether its presence in the dough had been voted on.

>>33095

OSS is running this board using pretty hefty Tavistock-type psyops, including these:

creating mutual distrust among target group members (internal dissension)

• pitting one against one another (anons against bakers)

• portraying targets as members of a hostile group (bakers union, mossad, aflb, payseur, paytriots)

• taking innocent remarks out of context (see above)

• making targets feel that they are being watched 24/7(posting all convos on /qr/)

• using ridicule, name-calling and ugly memes to portary the targets as less than human

I now see his baker name OSS as a 'tell', like the jewelry worn by DS agents. From an article i recently posted:

"The entire OSS program, as well as the CIA has always worked on guidelines set up by the Tavistock Institute.

https://freudianassociation.org/en/tavistock-the-best-kept-secret-in-america/

>>33096

>Didn't truly understand until I baked, how difficult it is to catch everything.

Boy, ain't that the truth!

>>33098

Good to see you, bro.

Good discussion going, plz jump in.

>>33101

Triple lattes, you say?

>>33112

well, in a thread like this, it's often a good idea to take a look at the first few posts, coz they reveal 'sup. Apologies if i jumped too hard. But this thread - as you can see - is for real discussion and a teaching and problem-solving focus. Once two bakers got into a tangle, so Rusty created bakers meta for stuff not class-related, espec. back and forth disputes.

>>33113

Seems like getting misjudged and maligned is a badge of honor these days. Kek.

>>33117

Right - you're a real troublemaker, Euro. Always causing a ruckus every time you bake.

>>33118

100% agree.

>>33054

sorry, didn't know you went by Qn (although that makes sense!) and as you can see, it's pretty shilly in here. Good to see you. But sorry about the situation with the notables here and wearethene.ws. That you're here is really great, you're a great problem solver.

>>33081

Gosh doc, look like regular guise to me!!

;[}

>>33083

freebaker never deleted anything until recently. it's because OSS crew is now deliberately harrassing bakers by posting crap in /bakers meta/ and then posting our conversations on /qr/. And baking innocent remarks out of context, and then acting like bakers are plotting letter bomb threats. Also posting crap like this - and worse.

Again, just to psychologically destroy us individually and collectively.

So i will not apologize for removing posts either in this thread or /bakers meta/. I may screw up from time to time, because i'm pretty inexperienced, but i'm learning fast.

>>33084

my crew is hundreds

wow, nice quote. good to steal for future reference. Where'd OSS get a crew of hundreds, anyway? Must be anons grateful for the "change in policy."

>>33084

The other quote is pretty revealing too:

"I am Become Death, the destroyer of comms faggotry."

>>33123

nope. who wants to bake such moldy breads? OSS took out both the new threads from comms (on anti-Q articles and Oregon/Washingon riots) - coz they are from /comms/ i assume. Good thing the boatfags and planefags are over on /qrb/ although i warned them they could be next.

>>33132

thanks, bro. You're a fighter, man. Kudos.

>>33133

>Over time, the loaves would reflect many different anons' "editorial" posture.

Which they already do. Or did, kek.

;-}

>>33138

Yeah, one of the things hard to hear was when bakers asked a complete newbie who wanted to bake on a busy shift to do some practice bakes, and some shill jumped in shat on /comms/ saying no one should have to practice bake before baking LIVE.

Rusty created this place to help bakers. It sure helped me, espec when all i had was nb's notes to go by. They were great - still are - but it was the ability to practice bake here on comms (espec shadow baking) that gave me the confidence to do it LIVE. i never would have baked without this practice board. And now to see people calling dedicated bakers comms bakers - like it's something disgusting…..breaks my heart.

>>33143

What gaslighting are you referring to?

Seems to me more like you're providing an excellent example of the same kind of techniques that are in the list. Think they call this one glittering generalisties.

Someone makes a specific point and a shill responds with a non-specific but insulting answer.

That about right?

>>33166

Yeah, important for us to keep our spirits up and also our thinking caps on. Which is one reason we're getting surveilled and shilled over here. And why /comms/ itself is under attack. OSS trying both to turn anons against bakers and to stress us out so we'll quit.

>>33167

Seems like most anons with half a brain will have seen thru this ruse by OSS.

But if he's being helped or even sponsored by FJ - then we need a way to even up the odds. Last time, Q intervened. What can we do this time around?

>>33171

CALL OUT THE BS

Yeah, that's what i did when i dropped the last advert before class today. Earlier, i posted a refutation of the BS complaint that bakers were trying talk privately by pointing out that OSS and FJ are certainly talking privately.

Wonder what they're talking about???

>>33263

oh, forgot the main point - that my refutation was NOMMED TWICE for global notable. Turned down by OSS because "no sauce" - even tho i included caps of the convo beween him and BO. Plus OSS has already admitted he first approach FJ by using Report - in other words, going behind our backs. Not just bakers' but anons'.

>>33207

guess i get to practice more deleting. Gonna be real pro soon what with all the shit that's getting posted on this board.

>>33262

yep. i won't bake.

really having fun with the shitposting these days tho.

>>33272

Ok - depends on the narratives they are trying to spin.

Some things need to be called out, others - not so much.

WhenI originally called out OSS on trying to sneak stuck in and out of the dough, I felt it was important to document what he did and call him out on it. Would do it again.

Same with documenting why that FUKKEN Global Notable about Doc, me, and GB being involved in a mail bomb post is a TOTAL LIE.

And last, the crap about bakers conspiring together and trying to find a place to talk: not gonna let that BS go unchallenged.

But some of the stuff they do just irritates anons like the repetitive spamming. So I guess it depends on the effect of letting a lie go unchallenged. Sometimes when they really ridiculous, better just to let em run with it.

>>33294

*sneak stuff

>>33230

tanks much.

anybody baking now?

>>33230

wow - is Q saying they were definitely expected POTUS to be very sick or dying at this point?

"recovery unexpected"?

assassination attempt then?

Best what he's getting was not really remdesivir….

>>33218

yes, i know. but this time, you really stepped up.

>>33214

we cannot. have to let it go for now.

>>33213

we you the baker that baked this one? my favorite bread title

>>33234

You'll just put a target on /qrb/ as well.

>>33234

Purpose of the OSS op is to shut down QR as an effective news generator.

HOWEVER, when FJ screwed over /qr/ so bad, 8bit created /qrb/ as an alternative and anons took it from there.

If anons get sufficiently fed up with /qr/ fuckery, they can always move to /qrb/ as before.

Has a good BO and baker who keeps the bread current. It's a great board, espec for DIGGERS.

why not?

>>33249

I just proposed moving to /qrb/ for a while. Still there, still ready. Are anons fed up enough, do you think?

Q said he would always post on /qresearch/ but he never said we had to!!

>>33289

OSS is surveilling everything we say and letting us know he's doing it And then taking innocent remarks and making them into letter bomb plans etc. Who wants a PSYCHOPATH following your every move.

Nobody should have to put up with deliberate efforts to bully, stress out, and intimidate for purposes of destroying both us and the board.

NO THANKS.

>>33202

then yer the guy who always beats me out when i'm trying to practice collecting q caps???

i can almost never get there as quick as a couple anons do

>>33296

Rusty was baking one day and got booted out for no reason by aflb in the middle of the bake. made this board instead - best revenge ever.

>>33298

problem is that breads rise to the top when accessed so it's pretty easy to tell if there's activity happening - if you're surveilling closely enough. which they are.

nobody likes to be watched constantly. the idea that it's not a problem if you've got nothing to hide - that's just bs. it's a form of psychic attack, plain and simple.

>>33301

well that's one piece of good news: more note-takers in the future.

(of course, i'm wondering just what kind of notes they're taking: ">>3847395 Q posted"

>>33311

oh fuck off faggot

this is the one thread where we never have to deal with faggoty shills like you

who always start their sentences with

"funny that you were the one who……."

maybe we leave this one in for its entertainment value?

>>33329

awwww

i always kek (with empathy) every time i see that bread

glad to know it's u

>>33350

Don't worry, i don't plan to defect. But I've always done some digging on /qrb/, espec the kind of diggs that don't get notabled on /qr/ because they're not today's news.

When /qrb/ was in operation, anons just went back and forth, often checking out digs on same topics on /qr/. Or checking out q posts. It was never a case of "deserting" qr like the shills said. /qrb/ used to have a link the way /comms/ does if i recall - anons wanted to keep it and FJ wouldn't do it.

>>33352

Isn't it great?

Now that i know it's euro's, i'll enjoy it even more.

>>33373

Don't think he ruined it, coz he doesn't have control of this board or this thread.

tanks fo coming.

>notables

yes they matter a lot

too bad they're so jacked

but might be it will compel anons to step up

to become more aware of 'sup

and not complacent

>>33374

tanks so much for coming

little bit late

but i'm here those hours too, my time

g'nite baker-with-the-best-bred-title-ever

o7

>>33368

you ready to wrap up, nb?

i'm about ready to call it a night

>>33398

yw, g'nite.

>>33395

hope yer not gonna wait her all night newsb….

;-}

but if you do, please enjoy the snacks at least

>>32976

>>33402

>>33402

g'nite….i'll see if i can at least find a meme if not the real thing, ck back later.

>>33402

>>33402

how dat?

>>33419

yes -

consonants

w3e

F88

w3e then started following him - like a child who runs to the abusive parent…..

>>33095

i saw what you have at the top of wearethene.ws

makes it sound like bakers are having a spat

we are not

we are working together

have been working together

all night sometimes

doing all we know how to do

that message

please change it

you have no idea

o7

>>33826

Here's the question:

should bakers be baking for Q or not?

Should bakers stand down - period?

If it's anon's board and anon's do not support bakers, isn't it their responsibility to bake for Q?

>>34284

KB, doubt much that BO checks much to see who's baking or who has the better claim - just deletes less "developed" bread. Likely to be completely impersonal.

>>34290

Understand. Well aware of FJ's history, certainly easy to believe he would throw in w/someone attacking the bakery. But i saw at least one example where BO/BV shut down OSS/OSS ally bred. I am the last person who would let FJ the hook, was a major target of his wrath last year. And after reversion, publicly told him an apology should be given. But it never was.

SEE CAP - you can go here for more:

https://8kun.top/qrb/res/19142.html#19846

So where does he stand now? Looks like with the guy trying to disrupt the kitch. Not 100% sure but it would be consistent with his history.

Blessings, KB. WRWY.

>>34525

More explanatory version of "FJ Hasn't Changed" cap.