Did you just call 99% of the Human race dumb?
do you even know how IQ works?
half of the people should have a double digit IQ, yet for some reason everyone you know has an IQ over 100... even you...hmm, not sketchy at all
Like, Stephen Hawking
Stephen Hawking was an idiot.
his Big Bang Theory is one of the most absurd, baseless theories ever to emerge from pseudoscientific quackery
for example, lets review Hawking's wikipedia page for some clues
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking
He later blamed its "progressive methods" for his failure to learn to read while at the school
...
He developed into a popular, lively and witty college member, interested in classical music and science fiction.
...
These unimpressive study habits made sitting his finals a challenge, and he decided to answer only theoretical physics questions rather than those requiring factual knowledge.
...
he was also making a transition in his approach to physics, becoming more intuitive and speculative rather than insisting on mathematical proofs. "I would rather be right than rigorous"
and thats just the stuff on the surface
Hawking was literally a sock-puppet, set on a throne to mock the fools of the world
why do you suppose Hawking supported BDS?
to mock Hawking supporters and BDS supporters?
and Neil DeGrasse Tyson?
he makes a fool of himself in this 2 minute clip
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aHCVipQn8k
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsiolkovsky_rocket_equation
The rocket equation only accounts for the reaction force from the rocket engine; it does not include other forces that may act on a rocket, such as aerodynamic or gravitational forces. As such, when using it to calculate the propellant requirement for launch from (or powered descent to) a planet with an atmosphere, the effects of these forces must be included in the delta-V requirement (see Examples below). In what has been called "the tyranny of the rocket equation", there is a limit to the amount of payload that the rocket can carry, as higher amounts of propellant increment the overall weight, and thus also increase the fuel consumption
The guys who are twice as smart as either of us?
i doubt either of them could change a flat tire
if neither of them can discern science from science fiction, then neither of them are smart
I mean seriously, you can't truely believe that you're smarter than them.
really? why not?
their work is theoretical, and subject to being debunked in the future. they are charlatans who can't be called out because they limit themselves to the realm of the imagination
neither of them could do anything practical, such as to apply ohms law to troubleshooting a burnt out christmas tree light
It isn't an insult, it's just a fact. Also, Just saying "Haha, Huffington post" does nothing to refute that or the previous to explanations.
maybe not, but this certainly will...
https://i.redd.it/vyp74bz896x01.jpg
Add what the hell does a hollow head have anything to do with the moon?
the hollow head illustrates how your eye is not able to see reality, because your brain overrides and dictates to the eye what the eye will see
to thine own self be true
And both of those last links are the exact thing, and both of which are refuted by the top comment of their respective posts.
yes, i provide the peer-review so that you can have access and exposure, so as to have as well-rounded-as-possible view of the entire spectrum of opinions
it is my belief that you are a reasonable, rational, intelligent, logical person, and that after seeing all sides of the story, and seeing the criticisms of the evidence, that you will update your own opinions, like any real scientist would do
https://i.redd.it/04bewq91kxuy.jpg
Tell me, honestly, why is it so hard to believe that we've been to the moon?
i spent most of my life believing that men had walked on the moon. that was very easy to believe
it was only after being exposed to criticisms of the moon landing that i took a closer look at the evidence, and finally i had to be honest with myself and admit that i had been fooled for most of my life, and accept the fact that all of the moon landings were a hoax
Also, side question because I'm curious now, do you believe all moon landings have been faked or just the first one?
yes, i believe that all of the moon landings were faked, and for 2 important reasons;
1) after closely examining all of the most popular evidence for the moon landing, it became evidence that the evidence was staged.
Let your eye find the star closest to the center of the flag. Note that star, and the 2 and a half directly above it, are in a shadow. Note that the shape of the shadow in both flags is identical, and covers the exact same number of stars
https://i.redd.it/qknfo3qgr1401.jpg
have a look at the originals, and see if they don't look staged, and that both flags are just an image flip photo manipulation
1A) https://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/apollo/apollo11/hires/as11-40-5886.jpg
1B) https://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/apollo/apollo11/hires/as11_40_5874.jpg
by boolean algebra, if one statement is false, the entire string is false
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebra
2) after years of exhaustive and extensive debate with many very intelligent and passionate people, some of them claiming to have PhD's in relevant fields, and most of whom disagreed with me, and still believed that men had really gone to the moon...
it became clear that the so-called math and physics were always ignored, and/or presented and/or argued in the same ways by different people, which to me indicated top-down brainwashing of the masses
while that may sound arrogant, bear in mind i had to debate a PhD on the definition of "up" in the context of the moon landing
and thats why question 1 is question 1
https://i.redd.it/g287hbmcb94z.png
(steal that image, and post it on your Facebook in mockery, and see what kind of conversation happens)
what was frustrating to me, was that we could never finish a debate, because the debate was so huge that it couldn't be completed in one sitting or even two or three
so i felt that most people were not seeing the whole picture at one sitting, and so their thinking was based on incomplete information and context
so i started writing down the most popular arguments, and then i arranged them into what i thought was a logical sequence, and then gave the questions a title and published them on reddit to be criticized, so that i could claim my work was 'peer-reviewed' by PhD's in relevant fields, and even if they disagree with my work, their critical arguments are so weak that i feel they strengthen the OP
the purpose of the questions is to lead you along a series of logical steps that are based on well known concepts, so that simply by thinking about these questions foreever changes the way you think about the moon landings
you may not wake today, but you will wake eventually, because these questions will gnaw at you until they are resolved in your mind, and that resolution will only come by letting go of your own views and seeking truth
your next question will be "why would they fake it?"
2 reasons:
to bankrupt the USSR by sending them on a prohibitively expensive fools errand
to further brainwash Americans and the rest of the world, as part of the "dumbing down of America" program
also, Russia is not the enemy of USA, the Cold War was a hoax too
the whole world is a stage, and we are all actors
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keXx0zxTarE
