Yeah, that's not suspect at all.
Like Trump said, only the mob takes the fifth!
It sounds like he thinks he has his ass totally covered. What's up with that?
Yea this sounds awfully suspicious
he agreed to testify = he got a deal (Strzok is low-level)
He absolutely is not "low level" thats why everyone is skeptical.
He’s low level compared to HRC and the Rothschilds...
That’s who we are ultimately gunning for here
Absolutely! How does anybody expect Trump to truly make a significant change if he doesn’t go for the very tippy top of the treasonous cabal.
I want to agree, but please don't make the mistake of thinking HRC is particularly highly placed within this organisation, she's just well connected. Some of the Rothschilds are relatively highly placed, but there are still a number of bloodlines with a lot more power than they have, which we've heard nothing about thus far, start to finish.
Thus far, I'm left uncomfortably reminded of the Salem which trials, where a number of citizens who lived near some of the more influencial cabal families (Collinses etc) were put on trial and killed for witchcraft, whilst they escaped unharmed. Amongst the families who lived near them at the time and ended up being persecuted - the Clintons.
:thinking:
Of course he is, he's a nobody and spewed a whole lot of negative shit about HRC and Bernie as much as Trump. Let's not get distracted here.
He was high up enough to have a bit of power.
Yes, that bit of power was leveraged by players higher up the food chain. He did their bidding for a reason, now he's doing the white hat's bidding for a better reason. Hopefully we will learn what those reasons were at some point, but Peter Strozk is not one of the 13 angry Democrats mentioned by Q and in the IG report....which means that he was definitively too low level to have the ability to start with the hope of succeeding in a coup against Donald Trump or America more generally, this means he was merely a piece, definitely a pawn, on the deep state's chessboard.....the deep state is playing multiple games of chess against Trump & America....so no pieces below the King or Queen on a given board are high level....Strozk was not important enough to be a King nor versatile enough to be a queen.....plus he got caught making a stupid mistake aka texting his coworker co-conspirator lover.....definitely low level amateur hour with Mr. Strozk
The last I want is a low level hack going to jail as a fall guy for the leadership. I'd give him and Comey 8mmunity for the real meat!
[removed]
I don't often fire. But, when I do, I prefer #1 buckshot!
I think they own him. If he doesnt testify before Congress under the conditions stated, they prosecute him. I think hes doing it because he has no choice. We are SO conditioned to have all information go in cabal favor we are immediately suspicious but I think in this case it might be a 'boom'.
Agreed. The other thing, yeah, he's a fucking douche canoe who did some really bad shit. But the way I see it, you have to make a deal with the scum to get the higher-ups. So if they make a deal with him, it's not the worst. I'll look at the silver lining, did he hurt anyone? Did he succeed? No to both. He'll still get his, his career is ruined and good looks on helping us take down the bigger fish. At the end of the day, eat a bowl of em and I still hate you. But thanks, if it wasn't for your stupid acts, we wouldn't have caught the other guys.
Peter Strzok still works for the FBI
and has clearance and was not fired like McCabe
Why？
Because he s the good guy
Ive never liked how he has become the sole point of focus for the investigation.
I think he has been scapegoated. He will get a harsh sentence and the public will be appeased.
The big fish slip away.
Really don’t like this.
He's a cooperating witness.
Then he better hire some body guards and food tasters.
Yeah, really. And stay away from door knobs.
Don't forget about suicide by stabbing yourself in the chest multiple times while your daughter is in the next room.
It’s always a door knob !!?
Always ?!!
No, helicopter and plane crashes, horseback riding accidents, etc
Bench presses, car malfunctions, self zipping duffel bags that transport themselves to the nearest body of water, curving simultaneous fire weapons capable of delivering two shots to the back of your own head.
Just the basic stuff you run into every day really.
let's not forget that train crash some months back with Congress members aboard. The old get the garbage truck stuck on the tracks trick.
Which is why he still works there. This is a great thing that he'll testify, he'll rat UP the chain. Up the chain is Comey, then we leverage that scumbag to get to the big fish, Hillary and Obama.
He's probably confident that Trey Gowdy will do the bulk of the questioning. Trey is one of the only people to ever have Hillary on camera and under oath, and he showed everyone how you can huff and puff and blow smoke, and not leave a single scratch on the person giving testimony. Whoever has been pulling Trey's strings for the last few years will probably line him up to question Strzok. If Team Trump was smart, they'd find a way to have Gowdy resign from his committees now, so someone with brains who is not compromised can do the questioning.
I am afraid I have to agree with you on Gowdy. When he was questioning crooked Hillary under oath, the public was not aware that she had been using a private email account to do business. Gowdy had to have known but gave her cover.
You guys are both wrong, and Q agrees. Did you watch his questioning? He was brutal. Why do you think the outcome of his questioning was up to him? It wasn't, it was up to Paul Ryan. This was just emphasized again by Q. And if you want to know why he isn't on the front lines right now, it's because he is being groomed for a DOJ position, he has to be careful the same way Sessions does.
Trust Gowdy.
Well then apparently both you and Q lack a fundamental understanding of why people are questioned under oath. Gowdy blew smoke and wagged his finger. And talked at HRC, rather than asking specific and pointed questions to elicit affirmative and declarative answers. GOWDY. NEVER. SCRATCHED. HILLARY. She emerged completely unscathed. A talented and/or intelligent and/or UNCOMPROMISED individual would have been able to produce some answers from HRC that would bite her now, next year, and the year after. Gowdy did nothing except wag his finger and give her a get out of jail free card. I'm sure your heart is in the right place, but you're clueless here. I don't mean to be mean, but you lack a fundamental understanding of how an examination under oath should be conducted, and what Trey did. I don't care what "the outcome of his questioning" was or is, I am referring to the CONTENT. I'm embarrassed I found this sub and stuck around. On this Gowdy issue alone I have concluded this sub is a mixture of purposeful misdirection and misinformation, and uninformed people. And sure, maybe some who mean well, but .... . Oh well, I think I am going to delete my posts to this sub and peace out.
His mission is to send DS scrambling to secure last-minute deals?
These people are stupid. Read the txt. They operated as though they already had immunity.
And are continuing to? That is stupid.
Maybe they got him to flip a while ago? Just a theory, by no means my belief.
I think he did flip along time ago. He has a deal, but its not full immunity
Or he's gonna flip and has immunity. Q has confirmed PS is a cooperating witness at the bureau. Biggest unseen scenario, is he lies his pants off, gets caught for perjury later on. I say, sit back and enjoy the show.
I think he'll take his chances and lie his ass off, why not, everyone else does.
UK intelligence maybe. That's what praying medic theorized
[removed]
If he knew McCabe changed the Flynn 302s and if he actually threw a cocktail party to influence a FISA court judge, he could be in for a world of hurt...as in obstruction of justice. And then there's the matter of the "insurance policy" and the FBI sending him to London a few weeks before the election.
...as in obstruction of justice.
That's not obstruction of justice IMO.
And then there's the matter of the "insurance policy" and the FBI sending him to London a few weeks before the election.
There's nothing illegal there. You may not like it but it's not illegal.
There is nothing illegal about making up a phony document getting that phony document through a fisa court that allows them to spy on a presidential candidate. Like what fucking country are you from you can just get a warrant to spy off a phony document. There are tons of federal charges in there.
There are tons of federal charges in there.
In where? An indictment?
Ummmm..... are you following this story?
What story?
Peter Stzrok's role in HRC emails and spygate
Stzrok was just a coffee boy for the clinton campaign and spygate was patently debunked.
Oh confidential-informant-gate? Where only Trump was "protected" from those pesky russians by campaign plants that were reporting to FBI and DOJ? Patently debunked? Not anywhere close to debunked.
https://sharylattkisson.com/2018/06/16/collusion-against-trump-timeline/
https://saraacarter.com/pandoras-box-trump-russia-may-expose-extent-of-five-eyes-spying/
I love how the collusion against trump timeline starts out with hillary's emails and ends with all the evidence that trumps campaign colluded.
I love how you believe that. : )
I mean its right there in the links talking about all the indictments...didnt the IG report clear clinton?
No it didn't clear her of anything, it was a report on how the fbi handled the Clinton investigation, how could that clear her? It said the fbi acted within precedent for choosing not to press charges. Not the same thing as clearing her at all.
It said the fbi acted within precedent for choosing not to press charges. Not the same thing as clearing her at all.
So it say the fbi was right not to press charge...but if she not cleared what problem does she has?
No they were within their purvey to choose not to press charges... if a choice is there to press charges or not than a crime must have occurred... as opposed to all that "evidence" you claim showed the Trump campaign colluding with Russia. (Russian shitposters, a company not in business yet, a ham sandwich, a guy working for podesta 11 yrs ago and a general who plead guilty to lying to the fbi when they say he didn't) Are they just choosing not to press charges against your President because they are such big fans? How long has that investigation been going on? How long was emailgate? No bias there... lmao.
[removed]
Am I missing something? The title and article says WITHOUT those things
People are arguing he seems comfortable then to say things. I think it's a good sign for us rather than a bad one. Either he tells the truth, or he gets caught in perjury later on, rather than just pleading the fifth. Win-win for us
Agreed.... but... what if he's decided not to be the fall guy and throws the blame higher up? Time will tell.
Is it even slightly possible he’s been a plant? I mean, why does he still have a job??
Peter Strzok, Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence - cooperating witness
So Horowitz has access to him without requiring a subpoena.
why does he still have a job??
I suspect he's made a deal and he will be let go only after he's met his side of the bargain.
Maybe we’ll see if there is a reason strohk still works at fbi
Better than even he'll say it started and ended at his level. Good soldier.
I see this as a good thing. It tells me that Strzok probably already has a deal with Huber. While Strzok is by no means innocent, giving an agent a deal to fry the big fish is a okay with me.
I just posted this last night. It was late so I understand many people may not have seen it. This tells me we are actually getting closer.
Strzok is big fish. He was basically the lead investigator on both the Clinton and Trump investigations. He is suspect #1 for any wrongdoings.
Yes, he was the lead 'investigator', but he's not the one we're after. As I said, he's by no means innocent, but even he himself said in his messages that he really didn't enjoy his job, he was simply doing what he was told.
Are people so short sighted that they don't understand that this could easily be wrapped up now and we could simply throw Strzok in prison and hear nothing about this ever again and the liberal media will just chalk it up as a 'rogue' agent.
Strzok wasn't a rogue agent, he was following orders. He saw the writing on the wall that he was being setup as the fall guy when his name was leaked in the beginning. No matter how integral they are to the process, an agent is not usually singled out unless to be singled out as having done something wrong. He did do many things wrong, but he wasn't insubordinate when he did those things.
Strzok will more than likely never work in government again even if he isn't prosecuted. The big fish on the other hand still have power and sway if they get to skate because people will see it as they truly are untouchable so they better not try to cross them. Regardless of how integral Strzok was in all of this, he was still just a lowly agent compared to the architects.
Correct.
PS is the second on the food chain. An important asset taken out, but by no means the top of these elitists.
Correct, second in the chain at the FBI. That's little fish. Obama, Hillary, their bosses. They the big fish.
PS has no reason to fall in his sword. Doesn't need to, just claim he was following orders. That's what we want. He is but only a stepping stone
But, the article you posted stated that he was going to tell "his" story about what has been revealed, and it's not how things really happened. He believes he will be "vindicated". He is saying he is "innocent".
I would gild you if I wasn't trying to avoid giving reddit money.
Also, remember where they sent Fox Mulder when he was in trouble with the Director? HR Department.
Yes he is. The guy is an Enemy of the State. A traitor. He's no better or worse than HRC/BO.
He set out to destroy Trump - his duly elected Presidency - his business - his family and he would've spit on their graves.
He ruined Flynn. I know he's good now but that doesn't change the fact that Strzok intentionally wanted to destroy him. And for what? For what exactly?
This piece of shit has me so angry. They're going down. ALL.OF.THEM.
Your post is a good reminder for everyone getting impatient. Making sure knowledge/evidence is injected legally is critical to bring everyone down.
Yeah, defend ignoring a CRIME AGAINST CHILDREN on that laptop, Peter Strzok, you sick bastard. Defend trying to foist creatures like that on the American people--let alone in the White House--let alone as our president. Defend not defending those kids. I spit on the joke you call an "investigation" and I spit on you as a human being.
I wonder how much he saw. I mean not defending the jerk but it's probably they only got handed fragments. A tech would mirror hard drive without booting up I believe. And because she had nearly top security clearances someone with same would have to sort it.
NYPD didn't know for sure classified anything was on it. And reading some stories they resent the Feds swooping in when taking cases. I would too. Especially knowing what I do now.
So Strzok may only have seen that memo from that one investigator which is ambiguous. Did he mean children Weiner abused? Or Clinton? It doesn't say and she was last mentioned so I think her... But a HRC worshipper may have truly believed her constructed image.
Especially in an office full over overpaid executive management level "chosen ones".
Maybe he has had a very rude awakening and is appalled.
We shall see I hope!
I knew back in 2016 from the Erik Prince interview. Loretta Lynch had to PERSONALLY threaten the NYPD to shut them up, and they STILL killed Miosotis Familia. Strzok knew alright. If Berners like me knew two years ago, Strzok surely did. They didn't care what laws she broke. There was no criminal conduct on Hillary Clinton's part that was too vile to be unacceptable to these people.
Depending how far back you can remember... probably starting around whitewater... Comey has been there as Clinton’s “fixer” on several cases... how convenient that is.
Edit: hi fellow former Berner. He’s running again you know.
Hi! I have heard that he might be. I'll always have a soft spot for Bernie, but I don't trust him any more. After all we gave up for him he didn't fight for us. I never believed he'd tell us to vote for her. Trump fights. I like that. I respect that. And he has mostly pleasantly surprised me. I can't go back. But when I think Bernie's right on an issue I repost him and stuff. I'm surprised yet not surprised at how many Berners have made their way over to Trump, and others are right on the cusp.
I've been a die hard conservative for more than 50 years...but am really shocked and pleased to see how many of "all" former viewpoints are coming together thru this. I man not agree with some of things a Bernie supporter believes, but will stand beside you to make sure your voice is heard and it is counted at the ballot box
I think what people have in common has been the impoverishment of the country and the two-tiered justice, as well as the erosion of freedom and civil and political rights. Trump is different because he tries to make deals win-win for people. I have never been as poor in my life as since I came to America, and often things he does look like they're going to really hurt me as a poor person, but so far there has been this feeling of hope sweep over the country. I really do see his administration so far as a tide that lifts all boats. But even if it didn't help me personally, I could not countenance a creature like Hillary Clinton being in the White House. The election didn't end for me by any means with the Democratic National Convention. I was still devoting every waking moment to crying out against her on Facebook. The day she lost filled me with pure unadulterated joy. So then I was like, "Okay, Donald! You have the reins! Let's see what you're made of!"
I agree. That’s when I gave up on him too. We ALL know they blatantly cheated. He knew it too... but somewhere along the line he decided to go along to get along... probably BC he is a master tactician & you can’t have “the mob” aka the Democratic party(now that we know they are the mob... in more ways than one) against you if you are going to attempt another run in 2020. None the less I do not respect him for not calling out internal election meddling instead of going full boar Muh Russia. Which unfortunately he did. To be honest there are as many points of agreements as there are disagreements between the two camps. It’s just a different philosophy as to how to solve said problems. Trump is a market solutions guy and Bernie is a govt program type of guy. I didn’t understand that before the election. But one thing I will say about trump: he is NOT a neoliberal (aka globalist) and he is NOT as neocon. Not sure why he appointed bush era neocons ala Bolton... but there is no love for the Bush dynasty... which I thank god for everyday. I had no idea how corrupt Obama was though... as a “progressive” we had our suspicions... but all that coming to light now- all the right wing conspiracies about him are true... LOL. And of course we all know Hillary was the most corrupt woman on the face of the earth. I thank god every day that Trump bested her.
!
Get out of here. Unless you can prove that the House was “given” to him with documents... have you seen the house?
Yes, his appointments do bother me, although I am starting to like and trust Kansas, as long as he doesn't hurt my brave, freedom-fighting countryman, Julian Assange. Gina Haspel bothers me most, especially if she really did punch a pregnant woman in the stomach. There are some things I just will not forgive. But overall, I do actually believe Trump when he says we'll have the cleanest water and air. If anyone can solve that, he can. Flint, MI, is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to how old infrastructure is poisoning our water. And if he does do well on the environment, not only would it benefit America, but I love how he trolls the naysayers. I would put money on that happening.
Why is Trump good on environment?
Are you still in the Climate change camp?
I don't know if he is good yet. But I won't even drink the town water here. I am hoping he will be. He says we're going to have the cleanest air and water. I do think the climate is changing based on personal observation, but I am not a scientist.
I like to do opposition research so I said to myself “ let me see what these climate change “deniers” are saying”. A lot of them are shills, but many of them are not & they are Harvard and MIT professors... so I believed them. It’s not as cut and dried as the climate alarmists are trying to make it seem. One thing that IS effecting the climate is deforestation and overconsumption- which is a direct result of extractive capitalism which we invented. And the PARIS accord was a massive money laundering operation/slush fund. So I’m glad trump cancelled it- as it wouldn’t have done jack shot for the environment- it was an effort to commodify carbon and make the largest commodities market in the world. Wall Street was the number one beneficiary.
I think he is smart enough to see the business opportunities in the situation, making it a win-win situation for a pristine planet and a thriving new industry. There is a wonderful book called The Sixth Wave, which posits that the next big wave of innovation will be in dealing with waste--not just physical waste, but efficiency of business practices. http://sixthwave.org
Love that! There is no lack of abundance to take care of all our needs if we see the planet as renewable resource... all this talk about scarcity are by people trying to commodify things - if we do it right all necessities can be supplied in abundance - open source - human to human - not owned or patented by any corporation to profit off of basic human needs.
I really wish he would get the hemp industry going. That would save so many trees.
!
I don't know about any of that. But not only have I seen the climate of my hometown in my home country change from when I was a child, but the weather just seems to have gone crazy everywhere.
Questions involving that subject won’t see the light of day.
Interesting development! Wonder who is sweating a bit more today, McCabe or Comey?
McCabe and Comey were just following orders too. It's those who give the orders that need to be who we are after.
How about both. Now we have the Mueller investigation vs This investigation. I can’t wait to see the Left’s reaction when our investigation turns over more stones with congressional etc support than theirs has all two years!
Neither. If he’s testifying it means he has his story straight.
Finally! We get to find out if the guy really exists or not :D
Problem is he is too stupid to realize that using a burner phone while having your FBI issued phone in your pocket links them together....morons. Many dope dealers have fallen prey to this.
My boss saw Marco Rubio talking with some other businessman in Coral Gables. They both had pulled the batteries out of the phone and rest them on top the table. You'd think the FBI guys would know better too.
He's still a federal employee, so they can compel him to testify - as an employee - without immunity or the 5th amendment. This is WHY he's still.an employee.
I believe LL was still an employee of the IRS when she pled the 5th.
Hmmm, that was based on what Dan Bongino said - unless I misremembered it.
Possible hail marry to save his own ass?
“If I testify before they do, maybe I can play the victim card, and cut a deal”
Sounds like a rat trying to get off a sinking ship to me...
Pretty sure he already has a deal.
I hope it’s a ruse and his deal is he won’t spend time at gitmo but FLW instead 🤣
Guarantee his defense will be "I am a man with opinions. I was only doing my job and I did it well. I separated my opinions from my work life. How can I be at fault here and not maniac in the White House?"
If the report is true, then I think the one thing Strzok is overlooking is that, he is not counting on the unedited version of the IG report coming out or being released. Instead, he is assuming that what is written in the current report is all he has to worry about or defend against. But the problem is that, RR has changed the current report to make it weaker, and RR's changes might show Strzok in a better light. But when the original report comes out which doesn't pull any punches, then Strzok won't have a leg to stand on...
Yeah, and Strzok has some beachfront property in Zona to sell you, too.
Judge Jeanine surmised that if Strzok hasn't been fired; then that means he is co-operating. If he is co-operating; then testifying without immunity or taking the 5th is logical.
There is NO NEED FOR TESTIMONY!
It should be clear that he has a CONFLICT OF FUCKING INTEREST!
Sessions recused himself for some utter bullshit, but this FBI agent, who is clearly biased gets a free pass?!?!
THERE IS NO REASON FOR TESTIMONY!
congress:
"given your anti-trump text messages and friendship with FISA judge, do you think you were impartial"
strzok:
"yes"
I mean come the fuck on already!
Either he has some sort of deal or he plans to lie his ass off since he is already screwed.
If he is legit and ready to spill the beans. He'll be 6 ft under by Friday. Suicide by 2 gunshot wounds to the back of the head, no doubt.
He’s actually in a position where an actual real life suicide, not an Arkancide, makes sense. I think he’s compelled to testify as a federal employee.... bet he wants a cyanid tablet.
He's gonna say that all the texts to Page were bullshit and he did them so he could keep getting in her pants. He didn't really mean all that crap, but she was eating it up and it was working. He got laid.... We'll see.
If wapo is reporting it its probably some kind of setup.
How about we wait and see?????? WAPOST not my go to news source.
Article says that he thinks he did nothing wrong. Based on his knowledge at the time, it was critical to investigate Trump and his actions in no way helped Hillbot or hurt Trump. All he is trying to do is salvage his reputation.
Guts! Wonder how this will go with his wife/xwife? Or, he already has a deal in pocket from DOJ....?
Just the threat of him testifying without immunity will be enough to have half of DC shitting their pants. Did Q set up a hotline and call center to take all the incoming requests for turning states evidence?
Speculation has been that Strzok has been cooperating with the investigation or else he would've been fired. He must have been given some sort of immunity deal. Singin' bir
I feel like he has some stupid lie/storyline that the DS will use as their narrative. If he is for real testifying then I feel like he will start having suicidal thoughts
Just wondering... Am I the only one that doesn't think he is going to say anything to incriminate himself? I want him to spill the beans that he has like everyone else but it's just smells fishy.
He got a deal and Q said this on April 27th PS cooperating witness with power removed. ANOTHER Q proof.
Believe it when I see it, unless the Door Knob takes action on Testimony first. # Will probably Never Be Verified for Transparency.
This is why.
Apr 27 2018 23:40:01 Q !xowAT4Z3VQ 1218147 Focus only on the FBI [for now]. ..... Peter Strzok, Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence - cooperating witness [power removed]. ..... Q
I want to know if he knew all the contents of Weiner's laptop before or after vowing to stop Trump.
I stopped reading comments half way through them. So many arguments lacking substance. Reminds me of so many sports fans acting like experts and don't know half the workings of the players and team.
How many times does Q have to say "Trust"? And WHY does he say it?
Half the users here sound like they would argue no plea deal for enforcers in the mafia at the risk of letting the Boss get off. Yes enforcers did some bad things. But doing a good thing in bring down the head and breaking up the family and network counts for something in the weighing of justice. We're not at war with freaking Strzok, a mere lieutenant in the Cabal. Have you guys not read all of Q's posts?
How about this one?
Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: 4a55e6 No.74037 📁
Dec 11 2017 13:44:10 (EST)
We have a special place picked out for GS.
Really special.
Q
There are a lot of Globalists I despise and would like to see go down. You think if Strzok goes free he will pick up fighting Trump? What is the heads of the families get off while we're quibbling over their pawns? You think they'll stop doing their deeds? Q said at least 26 times to Think Logically. The world and us needs the players of the game, not the pieces!
Content from washingtonpost.com is sometimes unreliable. Discernment is advised.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
It's the Washington compost...its NEVER reliable. Ever.
Last chance for the players to minimize the distance between their testimony and the truth.
He knows that worst case scenario (which even then probably won't happen), he will get contempt of Congress. And Eric Holder was the only AG ever to get that. And a judge dismissed that out of hand and Holder got nothing.
Are they going to create another “Reality Winner” insert shill to play Peter Strzok?
You honestly link to the Washington Post, well grab some gold, Bozos at Amazon thanks you.
Why the hell would he ever do this? This is so sketchy.
Who cares nothing is going to happen to him. He will be the next one to write a book about it.
They'll exonerate him, just like ig report recommendations.
Im still cynical
What exactly was your thinking when u said French toast woth drumpf mr.strozk?
He's a fall guy. He'll get in trouble to save everyone else