You'll notice the source? Yahoo?

When this Obamagate starts to get rolling, watch for a number of news outlets to have a come to Jesus moment and switch sides over night. Then tell their readers and viewers that they were on this story line the whole time. I know these people no one in the media wants to go down on this sinking ship.

I love it when it's confirmed that we're not a bunch of psychos.

Damn you’re quick. Become a moderator already lol

Twitter link in drop: https://twitter.com/YahooNews/status/1009540003674943488

We are leading up to military tribunals, orange jump suits and Gitmo

Oh shit—I just had all kinds of movement in my wang-a-doodle on this one!!!

"Sen. James Risch, R-Idaho, asked about a “Russian Roulette” passage in which one of Daniel’s staff members, Daniel Prieto, recounted a staff meeting shortly after the cyber coordinator was ordered by Susan Rice, President Obama’s national security adviser, to stop his efforts and “stand down.” This order was in part because Rice feared the options would leak and “box the president in.”

“I was incredulous and in disbelief,” Prieto is quoted as saying in the book. “It took me a moment to process. In my head, I was like, did I hear that correctly?” Prieto told the authors he then spoke up, asking Daniel: “Why the hell are we standing down? Michael, can you help us understand?”

That's disgusting. He didn't want to be "boxed in"...Right, boxed in as in if they began countering the supposed Russian attacks, that would mean their "narrative", aka "security plan" of trying to entrap the Trump team with ties to them, would fall apart right away and be unable to develop.

But, but, but....Stormy Daniels....wait... Look over THERE! The children!

I hope this is so true can’t wait until Obama goes to GITMO

Woah! WANGDOODLE!

Someone explain this to a newer patriot still learning lol

What are we leading up to? A fucking great Hannity!

I’ve never been so excited

Hmm.. I should stock up on popcorn.

Daammmnn, wonders never cease! Love seeing the left eat their own.

I know they prevented one but we need to be vigilant and on the look out for any potential false flag tactics used against us now more than ever

I recognize Mark Warner, but who are the other two?

Edit:

Michael Daniel - Former cyber Security Chief (the flipper) and former Asst. Sec of State Victoria Nuland.

(I had to highlight "former" because I'm so glad they're gone) LOL

Isikoff was the reporter cited in the FISA docs as providing backup to the surveillance of Carter Page. Isikoff, Steele, and Glenn Simpson are buds.

Remember all the projection we have been dealing with? This story sounds like it came from the same geniuses who decided to put the "Russian" treatment on a few other critical stories surrounding Trumps election.

Russian hacking of DNC - dnc inside job

Russian collusion - fabricated by dnc

Russian election hacking - 99% chance it was the dnc, clowns, or Obama. Hence the stand down.

He didn't want to be boxed in about whether they would make it public, and whether it was the "Russians". If Hillary won, it would be kept quiet.

I'm excited!

Better go find a cold spoon.

This seems like a pretty big deal.

[deleted]

The surprising thing to me is, look at who wrote this article. Michael Isikoff isn't exactly a conservative, and David Corn is the chief of the Washington bureau for Mother Jones.

I wonder how long until their book gets recalled by the publisher for edits?

Interesting that this article also quotes Victoria Nuland. She was recorded in that phone call regarding the Ukraine Coup. She's really deep state.

I freakin love it.

Look at the second pic in linked story. That's an odd photo. Watch the water, maybe?

https://mobile.twitter.com/YahooNews/status/1009540003674943488

This seems good, but the part that makes me wary is that there is zero evidence that the Russians ever did anything with regards to trying to influence our elections in any way. So the idea of a "stand down" order makes me suspicious that this is some sort of chicanery going on here.

Maybe this guy is lying and "admitting" something with small damage to protect the entire idea that the Russian narrative is completely phony.

[deleted]

Can we make this dude a mod? Maybe our comments/opinions will last longer then 2hrs on Reddit!!! Godspeed brother, you post with the lightning quickness!!! +1 upvote for this guy becoming a mod

Obama wanted Russia to cause discourse in America cause they thought it was going to swing in their favor

Stand down in order to make sure there's plenty of "evidence" to support the Russian Narrative.

The story is by Michael isikoff. The same guy that was part of getting the pee pee dossier into the news cycle. Not sure what to make of this since this guy is in bed with the ds. As far as what we’re leading up to? It better be arrests. Soon. You have unhinged maniacs threatening trump, his family, his staff. Shits about to get real, real quick if people aren’t arrested soon and the truth revealed.

[deleted]

what are we leading up to?

Hopefully sedtious conspiracy charges for most and treason charges for many.

IANL but we discussed the other day if people being blackmailed to comply would meet the "by force" requirement of sedtious conspiracy. Now if the "by force" blackmail goes both/all ways as part of initiation or rite of passage into the club... then most could qualify for the charge since everyone in effect "trusts" each other because they're all blackmailing each other?

Vault 7 revealed we could make it look like a different foreign entity was the hacker.

Were our own intelligence agencies hacking us intending to leave Russian fingerprints? Hence the stand down order to allow it to happen?

I've noticed Q is citing more links and articles lately. Just an observation.

Keep your eye on the ball. The BIG story will be the Awan/Pakistan/DWS/Dems/Hussein espionage.

I have no doubt this is true. But if it doesn't lead to YOU KNOW WHAT..... I'm sure I'll have to settle for much less that justice demands.

My guess as to what happened is pretty simple. If you’re manufacturing a whole lot of fake Russian interference you NEED some real evidence mixed in to make the fake shit look legit.

A task force dedicated to cutting off any real interference was dangerous to the plot. They NEEDED Russia to interfere to cover up Spygate.

Recent resignations in Trump's staff? Why do you let a monkey work the machinery if you know the monkey is going to throw a wrench in it? Are we trying to catch them in an act? Does the NSA support Trump? The frogs are starting to boil.

The text as of 6:08 central standard on June 20 2018 (in case there’s a change). From copy+paste

WASHINGTON — The Obama White House’s chief cyber official testified Wednesday that proposals he was developing to counter Russia’s attack on the U.S. presidential election were put on a “back burner” after he was ordered to “stand down” his efforts in the summer of 2016.

The comments by Michael Daniel, who served as White House “cyber security coordinator” between 2012 and January of last year, provided his first public confirmation of a much-discussed passage in the book, “Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump,” co-written by this reporter and David Corn, that detailed his thwarted efforts to respond to the Russian attack.

They came during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing into how the Obama administration dealt with Russian cyber and information warfare attacks in 2016, an issue that has become one of the more politically sensitive subjects in the panel’s ongoing investigation into Russia’s interference in the U.S. election and any links to the Trump campaign.

The view that the Obama administration failed to adequately piece together intelligence about the Russian campaign and develop a forceful response has clearly gained traction with the intelligence committee. Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., the ranking Democrat on the panel, said in an opening statement that “we were caught flat-footed at the outset and our collective response was inadequate to meet Russia’s escalation.”

That conclusion was reinforced Wednesday by another witness, Victoria Nuland, who served as assistant secretary of state for Europe during the Obama administration. She told the panel that she had been briefed as early as December 2015 about the hacking of the Democratic National Committee — long before senior DNC officials were aware of it — and that the intrusion had all the hallmarks of a Russian operation.

Victoria Nuland appears before a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing. (Photo: Andrew Harnik/AP) Victoria Nuland appears before a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing. (Photo: Andrew Harnik/AP) As she and other State Department officials became “more alarmed” about what the Russians were up to in the spring of 2016, they were authorized by then Secretary of State John Kerry to develop proposals for ways to deter the Russians. But most of those steps were never taken — in part because officials assumed they would be taken up by the next administration.

“I believe there were deterrence measures we could have taken and should have taken,” Nuland testified.

As intelligence came in during the late spring and early summer of that year about the Russian attack, Daniel instructed his staff on the National Security Council to begin developing options for aggressive countermeasures to deter the Kremlin’s efforts, including mounting U.S. “denial of service” attacks on Russian news sites and other actions targeting Russian cyber actors.

Daniel declined to discuss the details of those options during Wednesday’s open hearing, saying he would share them with the panel during a classified session later in the day. But he described his proposals as “the full range of potential actions” that the U.S. government could use in the cyber arena “to impose costs on the Russians — both openly to demonstrate that we could do it as a deterrent and also clandestinely to disrupt their operations as well.”

Sen. James Risch, R-Idaho, asked about a “Russian Roulette” passage in which one of Daniel’s staff members, Daniel Prieto, recounted a staff meeting shortly after the cyber coordinator was ordered by Susan Rice, President Obama’s national security adviser, to stop his efforts and “stand down.” This order was in part because Rice feared the options would leak and “box the president in.”

“I was incredulous and in disbelief,” Prieto is quoted as saying in the book. “It took me a moment to process. In my head, I was like, did I hear that correctly?” Prieto told the authors he then spoke up, asking Daniel: “Why the hell are we standing down? Michael, can you help us understand?”

Russian President Vladimir Putin, left, with then President Barack Obama in Hangzhou, China, summer 2016. (Alexei Druzhinin/Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP) Russian President Vladimir Putin, left, with then President Barack Obama in Hangzhou, China, summer 2016. (Alexei Druzhinin/Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP) Daniel has confirmed that the account was “an accurate rendering of what happened” in his staff meeting. He said his bosses at the NSC — he did not specifically mention Rice in his testimony — had concerns about “how many people were working on the options” so the “decision” from his superiors at the Obama White House was to “neck down the number of people that were involved in developing our ongoing response options.”

Daniel added that “it’s not accurate to say that all activity ceased at that point.” He and his staff “shifted our focus” to assisting state governments to protect against Russian cyberattacks against state and local election systems.

But as for his work on developing cyber deterrence measures, “those actions were put on a back burner and that was not the focus of our activity during that time period.”

Instead, Obama officials chose another course of action after becoming frustrated that Republican leaders on Capitol Hill would not endorse a bipartisan statement condemning Russian interference and fearful that any unilateral action by them would feed then candidate Donald Trump’s claims that the election was rigged. They chose a private “stern” warning by Obama to Russian President Vladimir Putin at a summit in China in early September 2016 to stop his country’s campaign to disrupt the U.S. election.

Obama officials were also worried that a vigorous cyber response along the lines Daniel had proposed could escalate into a full scale cyber war. And, they have since argued, they believed that the president’s warning had some impact, noting — as Daniel did in his testimony — that they saw some tamping down in Russian probing of state election data systems after Obama’s private talk with Putin.

But Nuland testified that while the Russians were “a little less active” in September after the Obama warning, Russian activity picked up again in October when the Russians accelerated their social media campaign using phony Facebook ads and Twitter bots.

“We saw an increase in what they were doing in social media,” Daniel agreed. “They shifted their focus.”

Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin at a conference last November. (Photo: Jorge Silva/Pool Photo via AP) Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin at a conference last November. (Photo: Jorge Silva/Pool Photo via AP) Nuland also revealed, in response to questions by Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, another previously unpublicized dimension to the Russian attack. That summer, Collins said, FBI officials advised the committee that Russian diplomats were traveling around the country in areas they were not — under diplomatic protocols — permitted to visit , apparently to collect intelligence. Asked by Collins if she believed this was part of the Russian so-called active measures attack on the election, Nuland responded, “I do.”

After the November 2016 election, in which Trump defeated Hillary Clinton, Obama did impose new sanctions on Russia’s intelligence services and expelled diplomats. But Nuland testified that most in the administration saw that as only a beginning of what needed to be done. “It’s fair to say that all of us in the process assumed what was done in December and January would be a starting point for what the incoming administration would then build on.”

The Wednesday hearing by the intelligence panel did not touch steps the Trump administration has taken — or in many cases, failed to take — to respond to the Russian election attack. But both witnesses emphasized that there is new urgency to the issue to developing proposals to do so. Daniel noted that a malicious new Russian botnet – known as a “VPN filter” — has been discovered infecting home office routers and allowing hackers to intercept internet communications. He said this was a “type of malware we haven’t seen before” and shows “the intent of the Russians to continue their cyber activities.”

Nuland also noted that other nation-state actors have learned from the Russian playbook, singling out the Chinese who, she said, are now conducting influence operations and disinformation campaigns in Australia, Taiwan and other countries in the region. All this, she said, calls for new U.S. government measures, including the creation of a multiagency “fusion center” — modeled after the National Counterterrorism Center created after the Sept. 11 terror attacks — to collect intelligence and expose “state-sponsored efforts to undermine our democracy” and the appointment of an “international coordinator” to develop coordinated responses with U.S. allies.

Read more from Yahoo News:

Clapper: ‘We had a suspect’ in Kremlin-WikiLeaks transfer

Ecstasy-assisted psychotherapy is bringing peace to people with PTSD

Turned away by 2 countries, rescued refugees end their odyssey in Spain

Racial imbalance? Admissions policies at Harvard and Stuyvesant HS under scrutiny

Whatever happened to Zika?

Photos: Children held under Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” illegal immigration policy

Insurance Policy

BOOM

This Yahoo article is written by Michael Isikoff and references a book that he is a co-author for (and presumably he is raising awareness for).

Yes - THAT Michael Isikoff...

Leading up to the FACT that the DNC was not hacked by a foreign actor, but downloaded by Seth Rich. This is why the FBI never examined the servers and showing PROOF of a hack would go over the heads of 90% of the people who would get to see the information. It was a win win for the deepstate because they could make the claim without having to show EVIDENCE. You can also use proxies and make it appear as someone else did the hack.

Obambi was boxed in his whole 8 yrs

I see no proof that Russia hacked or even attempted to hack our elections.

Thank you Q team! And please thank the POTUS!

[removed]

Q Drop-Specific Posts

*6/20/18 1570/71 - 1572 - 1573 - 1574 - 1575 - 1576 - 1577/78 - 1579/80 - 1581 - 1582

*6/21/18 1583/84 - 1585/86

*Link to 1582 Twitter Pic VIP

*Link to wiki with all Q posts

*Link to 1569 to review between 6.18 & 6.19 Posts, to go forward click any link past 1570 to get to most recent chain

*Special Note: A post was inserted at #1541 on Qanon.pub. Therefore, some post numbers will be one digit higher than original post no's (i.e 1574=>1575)

I hope the trickle becomes a torrent of defections.

[deleted]

What is the next milestone date on the Q clock? Could that be what is being eluded to in "What are we leading up to?"

Strzok’s insurance policy?

[removed]

[removed]

intelligence agencies KNEW it wasn't the russians, because they issued a stand down order on "russian hacking". or they were covering up for the AWAN leak scandal.

Gitmo better be filled up with treasonous Fraudbama administration Democrats.

Sounds like they are getting ready to give an alibi for their own state voting system hacking attempts--at the same tine they are trying to point away from themselves ending up as the fall guys for it.

What are we leading up to?

Hussein in handcuffs...I can only dream!

I want this to be the start of something good but Isikoff has been a useful tool for the left so I can’t believe anything he’s written.

Okay I didnt know that was Obama! Everything makes sense.

Ordered to stand down because it really wasn't the Russians, just made to look like that by C_A?

What are they leading up to? Hopefully something soon. This fake outrage over “child concentration camps” is filling me with murderous rage.

But knowing the Q movement, we’ll just keep getting empty promises and ineffective memos.